Stapled transanal rectal resection for obstructed defaecation and evidence-based practice

Endoscopic incision of rectal diverticulum: A case report

A 70-year-old woman with a rectal diverticulum presented with anal pendant expansion and difficulty in defecation for more than 1 year. The patient was diagnosed with a rectal diverticulum by pelvic enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), computerized tomography (CT), rectal angiography, and colonoscopy. The endoscopic diverticulum incision procedure (EDIP) was implemented with this patient. At the 4-month follow-up, anal pendant expansion and difficulty in defecation were significantly relieved. Furthermore, colonoscopy proved that there were no vestigial feces in the diverticulum.

Laparoscopic Ventral Rectopexy Versus Stapled Transanal Rectal Resection for Treatment of Obstructed Defecation in the Elderly: Long-term Results of a Prospective Randomized Study

BACKGROUND

Obstructed defecation is a common complaint in coloproctology. Many anal, abdominal, and laparoscopic procedures are adopted to correct the underlying condition.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to compare long-term functional outcome, recurrence rate, and quality of life between laparoscopic ventral rectopexy and stapled transanal rectal resection in the treatment of obstructed defecation.

DESIGN

This was a prospective randomized study.

SETTING

This study was performed at academic medical centers.

PATIENTS

Patients were included if they had obstructed defecation attributed to pelvic structural abnormalities that did not to respond to conservative measures. Exclusion criteria included nonrelaxing puborectalis, previous abdominal surgery, other anal pathology, and pudendal neuropathy.

INTERVENTION

Patients were randomly allocated to either laparoscopic ventral rectopexy (group 1) or stapled transanal rectal resection (group 2).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary outcome measures were improvement of modified obstructed defecation score and recurrences after ≥3 years of follow-up. Secondary outcomes were postoperative complications, continence status using Wexner incontinence score, and quality of life using Patient Assessment of Constipation-Quality of Life Questionnaire.

RESULTS

The study included 112 patients (56 in each arm). ASA score II was reported in 32 patients (18 in group 1 and 14 in group 2; p = 0.12), whereas 3 patients in each group had ASA score III. Minor postoperative complications were seen in 11 patients (20%) of group 1 and 14 patients of group 2 (25%; p = 0.65). During follow-up, 3 patients had fecal urgency after stapled transanal rectal resection but no sexual dysfunction in either procedure. After 6 months, modified obstructed defecation score improvement >50% was reported in 73% versus 82% in groups 1 and 2 (p = 0.36). After a mean follow-up of 41 months, recurrences of symptoms were reported in 7% in group 1 versus 24% in group 2 (p = 0.04). Six months postoperation, perineal descent improved >50% in defecogram in 80% of group 1 versus no improvement in group 2. Quality of life significantly improved in both groups after 6 months; however a significant long-term drop (>36 months) was seen only in group 2.

LIMITATIONS

Possible limitations of this study are the presence of a single operator and the absence of blindness of the technique for both patient and assessor.

CONCLUSIONS

In elderly patients even with comorbidities, both laparoscopic ventral rectopexy and stapled transanal rectal resection are safe and can improve function of the anorectum in patients with obstructed defecation attributed to structural abnormalities. Laparoscopic ventral rectopexy has better long-term functional outcome, less complications, and less recurrences compared with stapled transanal rectal resection. Perineal descent only improves after laparoscopic ventral rectopexy. Stapled transanal rectal resection was shown not to be the first choice in elderly patients with obstructed defecation unless they had a medical contraindication to laparoscopic procedures. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/A788.

STARR with Contour Transtar for Obstructed Defecation Syndrome: Long-Term Results

INTRODUCTION

Obstructed defecation syndrome (ODS) is a widespread and disabling syndrome. With this study, we want to evaluate the long-term results of stapled transanal rectal resection (STARR) performed with Contour Transtar device in the treatment for ODS. A re-evaluation of 113 patients subjected to STARR from June 2007 to January 2010 was conducted.

METHODS

All the patients treated for symptomatic ODS with STARR with Contour Transtar were included in the study. We re-evaluate all patients treated in the study period with clinical examination and specific questionnaire to verify the stability of the functional results and the satisfaction at 5 years from surgery. Constipation was graded using the Agachan-Wexner constipation score; eventual use of aids to defecate and patient satisfaction were assessed preoperatively, 6 months and 5 years after surgery. Long-term complications were also investigated.

RESULTS

Constipation intensity decreased from the preoperative value of 15.8 (±4.9) to 5.2 (±3.9) (p < 0.0001) at 6 months and remained stable after 5 years (7.4 ± 4.1; p < 0.01). Patients who use laxatives and enema decrease from 74 (77%) and 27 (28%) to only 16 (17%; p < 0.001) and 5 (5%; p < 0.001), respectively, at 5-year follow-up. None continue to help themselves with digitations after surgery. Also the satisfaction rate remained stable (3.64 vs 3.81) during the 5 years of the study.

CONCLUSION

The long-term results have demonstrated the efficacy of the STARR with Contour Transtar in treating ODS and the stability over time of the defecatory improvements.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

Clinicaltrials.gov NCT02971332.

Treatment of obstructed defecation syndrome due to rectocele and rectal intussusception with a high volume stapler (TST STARR-plus)

BACKGROUND

In recent years, stapled transanal resection (STARR) has been adopted worldwide with convincing short-term results. However, due to the high recurrence rate and some major complications after STARR, there is still controversy about when the procedure is indicated. The aim of this study was to assess the safety, efficacy and feasibility of STARR performed with a new dedicated device for tailored transanal stapled surgery.

METHODS

All the consecutive patients affected by obstructed defecation syndrome (ODS) due to rectocele or/and rectal intussusception, who underwent STARR with the TST STARR-Plus stapler, were included in a prospective study. Pain, Cleveland Clinic Score for Constipation (CCCS) and incontinence, patient satisfaction, number of hemostatic stitches, operative time, hospital stay and perioperative complications were recorded. Postoperative complications and recurrence were also reported.

RESULTS

Forty-five consecutive patients (median age 50; range 24-79) were included in the study. Median resected volume was 15 cm³ (range 12-19 cm³) with a median height of surgical specimen of 5.6 cm (range 4.5-10 cm). The mean CCCS decreased from 17.26 (± 3.77) to 5.42 (± 2.78) postoperatively (p < 0.001). Patient satisfaction grade was excellent in 14 patients (31.1%), good in 25 (55.5%), sufficient in three (6.7%) and poor in three patients (6.7%). No major complications occurred. Five patients (11%) reported urgency after 30 days and two patients (4%) after 12 months. The Cleveland Clinic Incontinence score did not significantly change. At a median follow-up of 23 months (range 12-30 months), only three patients (6.7%) reported recurrent symptoms of obstructed defecation comparable to those reported at baseline.

CONCLUSIONS

TST STARR-Plus seems to be safe and effective for the treatment of ODS due to rectocele and rectal intussusception, and technical improvement could reduce the risk of some complications. However, careful patient selection is still the best means of preventing complications.

Management of obstructed defecation

The management of obstructed defecation syndrome (ODS) is mainly conservative and mainly consists of fiber diet, bulking laxatives, rectal irrigation or hydrocolontherapy, biofeedback, transanal electrostimulation, yoga and psychotherapy. According to our experience, nearly 20% of the patients need surgical treatment. If we consider ODS an “iceberg syndrome”, with “emerging rocks”, rectocele and rectal internal mucosal prolapse, that may benefit from surgery, at least two out of ten patients also has “underwater rocks” or occult disorders, such as anismus, rectal hyposensation and anxiety/depression, which mostly require conservative treatment. Rectal prolapse excision or obliterative suture, rectocele and/or enterocele repair, retrograde Malone’s enema and partial myotomy of the puborectalis muscle are effective in selected cases. Laparoscopic ventral sacral colporectopexy may be an effective surgical option. Stapled transanal rectal resection may lead to severe complications. The Transtar procedure seems to be safer, when dealing with recto-rectal intussusception. A multidisciplinary approach to ODS provides the best results.

STARR with CONTOUR® TRANSTAR™ device for obstructed defecation syndrome: one-year real-world outcomes of the European TRANSTAR registry

PURPOSE

Stapled transanal rectal resection (STARR) in patients with obstructive defecation syndrome (ODS) is limited by the capacity of the circular stapler used. This prospective cohort study was conducted to assess real-world clinical outcomes of STARR with the new CONTOUR® TRANSTAR™ device, shortly named TRANSTAR, at 12 months postoperatively.

METHODS

From January 2009 to January 2011, consecutive patients who underwent TRANSTAR in 22 European colorectal centers were enrolled in the study. Functional outcomes and quality of life were assessed by the changes in a number of scoring systems (Knowles-Eccersley-Scott-Symptom (KESS) score, ODS score, St. Mark's score, Euro Quality of Life-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) score, and Patient Assessment of Constipation-Quality of Life (PAC-QoL) score), at 12 months as compared to baseline. All complications were recorded and analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 100 patients (98% female), mean age 60 years, were entered in the study. Statistically significant improvements were seen in the KESS (median 18 vs. 6; p < 0.01), ODS (median 15 vs. 4; p < 0.01), and PAC-Qol scores (median 2.10 vs. 0.86; p < 0.01). St. Mark's and EQ-5D scores improved nonsignificantly. Complications were reported in 11 % of patients, including bleeding (5%), staple line complications (3%), urinary retention (2%), and persistent pain (1%). No major complications or mortality occurred.

CONCLUSION

TRANSTAR facilitated a tailored, real circumferential full-thickness rectal resection, leading to improved patient functional and quality of life outcomes at 12 months postoperatively. It represents a safe and effective treatment for ODS in local clinical practice, although the sustainability of real-world results needs to be proven in the long-term follow-up.

STARR with CONTOUR® TRANSTAR™ device for obstructed defecation syndrome: one-year real-world outcomes of the European TRANSTAR registry

PURPOSE

Stapled transanal rectal resection (STARR) in patients with obstructive defecation syndrome (ODS) is limited by the capacity of the circular stapler used. This prospective cohort study was conducted to assess real-world clinical outcomes of STARR with the new CONTOUR® TRANSTAR™ device, shortly named TRANSTAR, at 12 months postoperatively.

METHODS

From January 2009 to January 2011, consecutive patients who underwent TRANSTAR in 22 European colorectal centers were enrolled in the study. Functional outcomes and quality of life were assessed by the changes in a number of scoring systems (Knowles-Eccersley-Scott-Symptom (KESS) score, ODS score, St. Mark's score, Euro Quality of Life-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) score, and Patient Assessment of Constipation-Quality of Life (PAC-QoL) score), at 12 months as compared to baseline. All complications were recorded and analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 100 patients (98% female), mean age 60 years, were entered in the study. Statistically significant improvements were seen in the KESS (median 18 vs. 6; p < 0.01), ODS (median 15 vs. 4; p < 0.01), and PAC-Qol scores (median 2.10 vs. 0.86; p < 0.01). St. Mark's and EQ-5D scores improved nonsignificantly. Complications were reported in 11 % of patients, including bleeding (5%), staple line complications (3%), urinary retention (2%), and persistent pain (1%). No major complications or mortality occurred.

CONCLUSION

TRANSTAR facilitated a tailored, real circumferential full-thickness rectal resection, leading to improved patient functional and quality of life outcomes at 12 months postoperatively. It represents a safe and effective treatment for ODS in local clinical practice, although the sustainability of real-world results needs to be proven in the long-term follow-up.

In patients with rectoceles and obstructed defecation syndrome, surgery should be the option of last resort

BACKGROUND

The indications for operation in patients with obstructed defecation syndrome (ODS) with rectocele are not well defined.

METHODS

A total of 90 female patients with ODS and rectocele were prospectively evaluated and treated with fiber supplements and biofeedback training. Univariate and multivariate regression was used to determine factors predictive of failing medical management.

RESULTS

Obstructive symptoms were the most prevalent presenting complaint (82.2%). Ultimately, 71.1% of patients responded to medical management and biofeedback. Multivariate regression analysis suggested that the presence of internal intussusception was associated with a lower chance of undergoing surgery to address ODS symptoms [odds ratio 0.18; P = .05], whereas inability to expel balloon, contrast retention on defecography, and splinting were not (P ≥ .15).

CONCLUSION

Rectoceles with concomitant intussusception in patients with ODS appear to portend a favorable response to biofeedback and medical management. We argue that all patients considered for surgery for rectoceles because of ODS should first undergo appropriate bowel retraining.

Stapled transanal rectal resection with contour transtar for obstructed defecation syndrome: lessons learned after more than 3 years of single-center activity

BACKGROUND

Obstructed defecation syndrome is a widespread and disabling disease.

OBJECTIVE

We aim to evaluate the safety and efficacy of stapled transanal rectal resection performed with a new dedicated curved device in the treatment of obstructed defecation syndrome.

DESIGN

A retrospective review of 187 stapled transanal rectal resections performed from June 2007 to February 2011 was conducted.

SETTINGS

The entire study was conducted at a university hospital.

PATIENTS

: All the patients with symptomatic obstructed defecation syndrome and the presence of a rectocele and/or a rectorectal or rectoanal intussusception, in the absence of sphincter contractile deficiency, were included in the treatment protocol.

INTERVENTIONS

All procedures were performed with the use of the Contour Transtar device. We analyzed the functional results of this technique, the incidence and features of the surgical and functional complications, and ways to prevent or treat them.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Constipation was graded by using the Agachan-Wexner constipation score; use of aids to defecate and patient satisfaction were assessed preoperatively and 6 months after surgery. Intraoperative and postoperative complications were also investigated.

RESULTS

The constipation intensity was statistically reduced from the preoperative mean value of 15.8 (± 4.9) to 5.2 (± 3.9) at 6 months after surgery (p < 0.0001). Of the 151 (80.3%) patients who took laxatives and the 49 (26.2%) who used enemas before treatment, only 25 (13.2%; p < 0.0001) and 7 (3.7%; p < 0.0001) continued to do so after surgery. None of the 17 (9.1%) patients who had previously helped themselves with digitations needed to continue this practice. Almost all patients showed a good satisfaction rate (3.87/5) after the procedure.

LIMITATIONS

Limitations are the short follow-up of 1 year and the design of the study that may introduce potential selection bias.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this study show that stapled transanal rectal resection performed with the use of the Contour Transtar is a safe and effective procedure to treat obstructed defecation syndrome.

Results in the long-term course after stapled transanal rectal resection (STARR)

PURPOSE

Stapled transanal rectal resection (STARR) has recently been recommended for patients with obstructed defecation caused by rectocele and rectal wall intussusception. Our study investigates the long-term results and predictive factors for outcome.

METHODS

Between November 2002 and February 2007, 80 patients (69 females) were operated on using the STARR procedure and included in the following study. Symptoms were defined according to the ROME II criteria. Preoperative assessment included clinical examination, colonoscopy, video defecography, and dynamic MRI. Preoperatively and during follow-up visits, we evaluated the Cleveland Constipation Score (CCS) to rate the severity of outlet obstruction and the Wexner Incontinence Score to rate anal incontinence. Patients were asked to judge the outcome of the operation as improved or poor/dissatisfied. We performed a univariate analysis for 11 patient- and disease-related factors to detect an association with outcome.

RESULTS

The median follow-up was 39 months (range 20-78). Major postoperative complications (one staple line insufficiency, one urosepsis, one prolonged urinary dysfunction with indwelling catheter) were found in 3.8%. The result after STARR procedure was a success in the long-term follow-up in 62 patients (77.5%), although the improvement did not persist in 15 patients (18.7%). The mean value of the CCS decreased significantly from 9.3 before surgery to 4.6 after 2 years and increased again slightly to 6.5 after 4-6 years. The Median Wexner Incontinence Score was 3.3 at baseline, but rose significantly to 6.0. However, a third of patients who reported deteriorated continence developed the symptoms 1-4 years after surgery. Of the factors investigated for the prediction of outcome, we could only identify the number of pelvic floor changes in defecography or dynamic MRI as being associated with the success of the operation.

CONCLUSION

Our study indicates that STARR is a safe procedure. A significant improvement of symptoms is to be expected, but this improvement may deteriorate with time. Patients' satisfaction is also associated with the occurrence of urge to defecate or incontinence. It remains difficult to predict outcome.

Comparative outcome of stapled trans-anal rectal resection and macrogol in the treatment of defecation disorders

AIM: To prospectively assess the efficacy and safety of stapled trans-anal rectal resection (STARR) compared to standard conservative treatment, and whether preoperative symptoms and findings at defecography and anorectal manometry can predict the outcome of STARR.

METHODS: Thirty patients (Female, 28; age: 51 ± 9 years) with rectocele or rectal intussusception, a defecation disorder, and functional constipation were submitted for STARR. Thirty comparable patients (Female, 30; age 53 ± 13 years), who presented with symptoms of rectocele or rectal intussusception and were treated with macrogol, were assessed. Patients were interviewed with a standardized questionnaire at study enrollment and 38 ± 18 mo after the STARR procedure or during macrogol treatment. A responder was defined as an absence of the Rome III diagnostic criteria for functional constipation. Defecography and rectoanal manometry were performed before and after the STARR procedure in 16 and 12 patients, respectively.

RESULTS: After STARR, 53% of patients were responders; during conservative treatment, 75% were responders. After STARR, 30% of the patients reported the use of laxatives, 17% had intermittent anal pain, 13% had anal leakage, 13% required digital facilitation, 6% experienced defecatory urgency, 6% experienced fecal incontinence, and 6% required re-intervention. During macrogol therapy, 23% of the patients complained of abdominal bloating and 13% of borborygmi, and 3% required digital facilitation.No preoperative symptom, defecographic, or manometric finding predicted the outcome of STARR. Post-operative defecography showed a statistically significant reduction (P < 0.05) of the rectal diameter and rectocele. The post-operative anorectal manometry showed that anal pressure and rectal sensitivity were not significantly modified, and that rectal compliance was reduced (P = 0.01).

CONCLUSION: STARR is not better and is less safe than macrogol in the treatment of defecation disorders. It could be considered as an alternative therapy in patients unresponsive to macrogol.

Conversion in transanal stapling techniques for haemorrhoids and anorectal prolapse

AIM

It was the aim of this single-surgeon series to assess the role of conversion in transanal stapling to techniques and to identify potential factors predictive of conversion.

METHOD

The details of all consecutive patients who were planned for a stapled approach were prospectively recorded in a PC database. Stapling techniques (PPH03, PPH01 and ContourTranstar) were indicated for haemorrhoidal disease and internal rectal prolapse. 'Conversion' from a stapled approach was defined as an unplanned change of the surgical method to a nonstapled, traditional technique, related to indication, anatomy and technical factors. The primary outcomes were whether the procedure was performed using a stapling device only, or whether the procedure was converted. Logistic regression analysis was performed to evaluate multiple variables as potential risk factors for conversion.

RESULTS

In a 2-year period (May 2006-May 2008), 258 patients met the inclusion criteria and underwent transanal surgery scheduled as a stapled approach. In these 258 patients, 246 procedures were completed as a stapled procedure [that stapled haemorrhoidopexy, n = 148; stapled mucosectomy, n = 52; stapled transanal rectal resection (STARR) with PPH01, n = 38; and STARR with ContourTranstar, n = 8], giving a completion rate of 95.4%. However, 12 procedures were converted to conventional surgery (including traditional haemorrhoidectomy and the Delorme procedure), giving a conversion rate of 4.6%. The reasons for conversion were related to anatomy and to clinical findings (nonreducible haemorrhoidal prolapse), to new clinical findings not detected preoperatively (proctitis, anal fistula) and to a technical inability to insert the circular anal dilatator because of a deep anal canal. Neither univariate nor multivariate analysis identified any factor to be specifically associated with the risk of conversion.

CONCLUSION

In the era of transanal stapling procedures for haemorrhoids and anorectal prolapse, the majority of procedures can be performed using stapled techniques if strict criteria of indication and patient selection are respected. However, the current study identified a 4.6% conversion rate to traditional treatment, which has an impact on informed consent and requires the surgeon to be familiar with conventional anorectal procedures.

Surgery for obstructed defaecation: does the use of the Contour device (Trans-STARR) improve results?

AIM

The objective of the study was to assess safety, efficacy and outcomes of stapled transanal rectal resection (STARR) procedure for obstructed defaecation syndrome (ODS) with two stapling devices, PPH01 and Trans-STARR.

METHOD

Data were collected on all patients undergoing PPH01 or Trans-STARR over a 2 year period. Initially, all were treated using the PPH01 device and during the last 8 months using the Trans-STARR.

RESULTS

During the analysis period, 25 consecutive patients were treated with PPH01 and 27 patients were treated with Trans-STARR. The median follow up was 12 months (range 3-12 months) for the PPH01 group and 6 months (range 3-12 months) for the Trans-STARR group. Although the resected specimen was larger in the Trans-STARR group (P < 0.001), there was no difference in early adverse events, time to discharge or late complications between the groups. In both groups, postoperative urgency was common (occurring more than occasionally in up to 40% at last review) but the incidence was high preoperatively. ODS and symptom severity scores improved with surgery (P < 0.001). However, the degree of improvement was similar with complete resolution of symptoms occurring in 64% of the PPH01 group and 67% of the Trans-STARR group.

CONCLUSION

Our study shows that both procedures are safe and effective in the surgical treatment of obstructed defaecation but despite a larger resection the Trans-STARR procedure does not offer any additional benefit. A policy of individualizing techniques tailored to the extent of prolapse may be appropriate, but requires further evaluation.

Quo vadis STARR? A prospective long-term follow-up of stapled transanal rectal resection for obstructed defecation syndrome

INTRODUCTION

Functional and clinical long-term outcome after stapled transanal rectal resection (STARR) in patients with an isolated symptomatic rectocele are investigated. Short-term results after 1 year are comparable with the functional outcome even after 5 years. Eighty per cent of the patients were still satisfied. STARR is an alternative procedure to the conventional surgical approaches for patients with an obstructed defecation syndrome and rectocele. Several studies have reported short-term outcome after STARR, but long-term results are still missing. The objective of this study was to evaluate long-term clinical outcome after STARR with a follow-up of 5 years.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Twenty patients with only an isolated symptomatic rectocele due to obstructed defecation syndrome were subjected to STARR. Functional and clinical outcome was assessed by Outlet Obstruction Syndrome score (OOS score), Wexner score (WS), and Symptom Severity score (SSS score). Data were prospectively collected over 7 years.

RESULTS

The perioperative morbidity after STARR accounted for 20% (n = 4). One patient was subjected to reoperation due to perforation, two postoperative bleedings occurred, and one patient developed an increasing local granulomatous reaction at the stapler line. The median follow-up accounted for 66 months (range 60-84). Sixteen patients (80%) were satisfied with the functional outcome. The median OOS, SSS and WS score improved significantly already after 1 year in these patients and remained stable at 5-year follow-up. In contrast, four patients were classified as treatment failures since the OOS score and the SSS score showed no improvement. At 5-year follow-up, these patients remained symptomatic without improvement in OOS and SSS scores.

CONCLUSIONS

The STARR procedure is an effective operation in isolated symptomatic rectoceles with regard to relief of the obstructed defecation syndrome. The short-term improvement after STARR predicts long-term outcome in obstructed defecation syndrome caused by a rectocele.

Assessing the safety, effectiveness, and quality of life after the STARR procedure for obstructed defecation: results of the German STARR registry

BACKGROUND

Internal rectal prolapse and rectocele are frequent clinical findings in patients with obstructed defecation syndrome (ODS). However, there is still no evidence whether stapled transanal rectal resection (STARR) provides a safe and effective surgical option. Therefore, the German STARR registry was initiated to assess safety, effectiveness, and quality of life.

METHODS

The German STARR registry was designed as an interventional, prospective, multicenter audit. Primary outcomes include safety (morbidity and adverse events), effectiveness (ODS, symptom severity, and incontinence scores), and quality of life (PAC-QoL and EQ-5D) documented at baseline and at 6 and 12 months. Statistical evaluation was performed by an independent research organization of clinical epidemiology.

RESULTS

Complete data of 379 patients (78% females, mean age 57.8 years) were entered into the registry database. Mean operative time was 40 min, mean hospitalization was 5.5 days. A total of 103 complications and adverse events were reported in 80 patients (21.1%) including staple line complications (minor bleeding, infection, or partial dehiscence; 7.1%), major bleeding (2.9%), and postsurgical stenosis (2.1%). Comparisons of ODS and symptom severity scores (SSS) demonstrated a significant reduction in ODS score between baseline (mean 11.14) and 6 months (mean 6.43), which was maintained at 12 months (mean 6.45), and SSS at preoperative and at 6- and 12-month follow-up (13.02 vs. 7.34 vs. 6.59; paired t test, p < 0.001). Significant reduction in ODS symptoms was matched by an improvement in quality of life as judged by symptom-specific PAC-QoL and generic ED-5Q (utility and visual analog scale) scores and was not associated with an impairment of incontinence score following STARR (p > 0.05). However, 11 patients (2.9%) showed de novo incontinence, and new-onset symptoms of fecal urgency were observed in 25.3% of patients.

CONCLUSION

These data indicate that STARR is a safe and effective procedure. However, conclusions are limited due to the selection and reporting bias of a registry. The problem of fecal urgency needs cautious reassessment.

Laparoscopic correction of enterocele associated to stapled transanal rectal resection for obstructed defecation syndrome

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

We report our experience of concomitant laparoscopic treatment for enterocele and stapled transanal rectal resection (STARR) for rectocele and/or rectal prolapse in patients with complex obstructed defecation syndrome (ODS).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

From June 2005 to June 2007, we submitted 20 patients with ODS due to rectal prolapse and/or rectocele, combined with stable enterocele, to STARR and laparoscopic correction of the enterocele. Preoperative assessment included symptom evaluation with standardized questionnaires, clinical examination, colonoscopy, proctoscopy, anal sphincter ultrasonography, video-defecography with synchronous opacification of the ileal loops in all patients and colpography in female patients, and anorectal manometry. Follow-up was performed in the first, third, sixth, 12th, and 24th month after surgery.

RESULTS

Eighteen (90%) patients were submitted to both procedures, simultaneously. One patient, previously submitted to STARR, underwent laparoscopic treatment of the enterocele. Postoperative complications occurred in two (10%) patients: one case of postoperative rectal bleeding and one case of retropneumoperitoneum. Median (range) preoperative and postoperative Altomare's obstructed defecation score was ten (6-14) and two (0-14), respectively (p<0.001). Median (range) preoperative and postoperative quality of life score was 79 (39-109) and 109 (50-126), respectively (p<0.001). No symptom related to ODS was detected at 6-month follow-up (19 patients) and at 24-month follow-up (19 patients).

CONCLUSION

The combination of STARR and laparoscopy provides a safe and effective method to treat ODS caused by rectal internal prolapse and/or rectocele combined with enterocele.

Surgical management of constipation

This review addresses the range of operations suggested to be of contemporary value in the treatment of constipation with critical evaluation of efficacy data, complications, patient selection, controversies and areas for future research.

STARR with Contour Transtar: prospective multicentre European study

OBJECTIVE

The stapled transanal rectal resection (STARR) in patients with defecation disorders is limited by the shape and capacity of the circular stapler. A new device has been recently developed, the Contour Transtar stapler, in order to improve the safety and effectiveness of the STARR technique. The study has been designed to confirm this declaration.

METHOD

From January to June 2007 a prospective European multicentre study of consecutive patients with defecation disorder caused by internal rectal prolapse underwent the new STARR technique. The assessment of perioperative morbidity and functional outcome after 6 weeks, 3 and 12 months was documented by different scores.

RESULTS

In all 75 patients, median age 64, the Transtar procedure was performed with 9% intraoperative difficulties, 7% postoperative complications and no mortality. The mean reduction of the ODS score was -15.6 (95%-CI: -17.3 to -13.8, P < 0.0001), mean reduction of SSS was -12.6 (95%-CI: -14.2 to -11.2; P < 0.0001). 41% stated improvement of their continence status by CCF score, only 4 patients (5%) had deterioration.

CONCLUSION

The Transtar procedure is technically demanding, with good functional results similar to the conventional STARR.

Stapled transanal rectal resection for obstructed defecation syndrome: one-year results of the European STARR Registry

PURPOSE

Stapled transanal rectal resection is advocated for the treatment of obstructed defecation syndrome. Supporting evidence for its safety and effectiveness has been lacking. To address this, the European Stapled Transanal Rectal Resection Registry was initiated in January 2006. This study was designed to analyze 12-month postoperative outcomes of this procedure using data collected in the registry.

METHODS

On May 17, 2008, data were downloaded from the Stapled Transanal Resection Registry to perform an analysis of 12-month outcomes. Data had been collected prospectively on effectiveness (symptom severity and obstructed defecation scores), quality of life, incontinence, and safety profile at baseline, 6 weeks, 6 months, and 12 months.

RESULTS

A total of 2,838 patients were entered into the registry, of whom 2,224 had reached 12 months of follow-up. Mean age was 54.7 years. A total of 2,363 patients (83.3%) were female. A significant improvement was seen in obstructive defecation and symptom severity scores and quality of life between baseline and 12 months (obstructed defecation score: 15.8 vs. 5.8, respectively, P < 0.001; symptom severity score: 15.1 vs. 3.6, respectively, P < 0.001). Complications were reported in 36.0% and included defecatory urgency (20.0%), bleeding (5.0%), septic events (4.4%), staple line complications (3.5%), and incontinence (1.8%). One case of rectal necrosis and one case of rectovaginal fistula were reported.

CONCLUSION

Stapled transanal rectal resection produces improved function and better quality of life for patients with obstructed defecation that is maintained at 12 months of follow-up. Further investigation is required to optimize patient selection and reduce the potential complications of postoperative defecatory urgency and pain.

Retroperitoneal sepsis with mediastinal and subcutaneous emphysema complicating stapled transanal rectal resection (STARR)

The STARR procedure was introduced a few years ago for the treatment of obstructed defaecation syndrome secondary to internal rectal intussusception and rectocele. We present a case of severe retroperitoneal sepsis with mediastinal and subcutaneous emphysema complicating STARR, treated by transperineal pelvic drainage and a loop sigmoid colostomy.

Long-term follow-up of simultaneous abdominoperineal repair of enterorectocele and internal mucosal prolapse

BACKGROUND

Enterorectocele with recto-rectal intussusception and internal mucosal prolapse (ER-RI-MP) may require surgery for obstructed defecation, but symptoms tend to recur if only one lesion is corrected. This prospective study was designed to investigate the results of an abdominoperineal procedure aimed at treating all these lesions in one stage.

METHODS

Thirteen women with constipation (median age, 58 years) and ER-RI-MP underwent Douglas pouch suture, mesh obliteration of the pelvic inlet with or without rectopexy, and omentoplasty plus rectocele and prolapse obliteration. Constipation was scored on a scale from 0 to 20. Proctoscopy, enterocolpodefecography, manometry, anal-vaginal-perineal ultrasound, and psychological evaluation were performed before and after surgery.

RESULTS

Bleeding requiring transfusion, pelvic hygroma, and ureteric stricture requiring adhesiolysis occurred in three patients. Constipation score significantly decreased from a mean (+/- standard error of the mean) of 16 +/- 0.6 before to 7 +/- 0.9 after surgery (P < 0.0001). Seven patients were considered cured, five improved, and one remained unchanged at a median follow-up of 42 months. Anorectal physiology and imaging returned to normal in seven patients. Four patients had successful rehabilitation and psychotherapy for anismus, rectal hyposensation, and depression.

CONCLUSIONS

Simultaneous abdominoperineal ER-RI-MP repair integrated with conservative treatment of associated dysfunctions achieved a satisfactory long-term outcome. The results need to be confirmed in larger series.

Reinterventions after complicated or failed STARR procedure

BACKGROUND/AIMS

The stapled transanal rectal resection (STARR) procedure has been suggested as a simple surgical option for patients presenting with evacuatory difficulty in the clinical presence of a rectocele. Most of these patients have a multiplicity of pelvic floor pathology unaddressed by the performance of one procedure. The aim of the study was to assess an unselected group of patients referred to a tertiary coloproctological unit following performance of the STARR procedure for obstructed defecation (OD) where the procedure was complicated or had failed.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Anorectal, urogynecological, and psychological examination with objective constipation/incontinence scoring, anal-vaginal-perineal ultrasound, manometry, and defecography were selectively performed utilizing the Iceberg Diagram to detect occult pelvic floor pathology.

RESULTS

Twenty patients were referred with 13 cases (female, 10; median age, 65 years; range, 40-72) operated upon. Post-STARR surgery was performed for three complications and ten failures including recurrent OD, severe proctalgia, and fecal incontinence. Overall, 11 patients underwent biofeedback therapy and psychotherapy. Of the operated group, 11 patients had a median of four associated disorders. Seven patients had a significant psychological overlay with severe depression or anxiety and four heterogeneous anal sphincter defects. Operative procedures were tailored to the clinical findings using enterocele repair, staple removal, fistulectomy, rectosigmoid resection, and levatorplasty where appropriate. Twelve patients were evaluated after a median follow-up of 18 months. Of these, six (all with psychoneurosis) remained unchanged. Three patients with no psychological overlay were asymptomatic with a further two improved.

CONCLUSION

The STARR procedure, when complicated or failed, has a poor outcome following surgical reintervention. It requires careful patient selection to determine the associated pelvic floor pathology and pre-existent psychopathology.

Outcomes of stapled transanal rectal resection vs. biofeedback for the treatment of outlet obstruction associated with rectal intussusception and rectocele: a multicenter, randomized, controlled trial

PURPOSE

This study was designed to assess the safety and outcomes achieved with stapled transanal rectal resection vs. biofeedback training in obstructed defecation patients.

METHODS

A total of 119 women patients who suffered from obstructed defecation with associated rectocele and rectal intussusception were randomized to stapled transanal rectal resection or biofeedback training. Stapled transanal rectal resection was performed by using two circular staplers to produce transanal full-thickness rectal resection. Primary outcome was symptoms of obstructed defecation resolution at 12 months; secondary outcomes included safety, change in quality of life score, and anatomic correction of rectocele and rectal intussusception.

RESULTS

Fourteen percent (8/59) stapled transanal rectal resection and 50 percent (30/60) biofeedback training patients withdrew early. Eight (15 percent) patients treated with stapled transanal rectal resection and 1 (2 percent) biofeedback patient experienced adverse events. One serious adverse event (bleeding) occurred after stapled transanal rectal resection. Scores of obstructed defecation improved significantly in both groups as did quality of life (both P < 0.0001). Successful treatment was observed in 44 (81.5 percent) stapled transanal rectal resection vs. 13 (33.3 percent) evaluable biofeedback training patients (P < 0.0001). Functional benefit was observed early and remained stable during the study.

CONCLUSIONS

In this controlled trial, stapled transanal rectal resection was well tolerated, was more effective than biofeedback training for the resolution of obstructed defecation symptoms, and improved quality of life, with minimal risk of impaired continence. Thus, stapled transanal rectal resection offers a new treatment alternative for obstructed defecation after failure of conservative measures including biofeedback training, a noninvasive approach.

Postoperative complications after procedure for prolapsed hemorrhoids (PPH) and stapled transanal rectal resection (STARR) procedures

Procedure for prolapsing hemorrhoids (PPH) and stapled transanal rectal resection for obstructed defecation (STARR) carry low postoperative pain, but may be followed by unusual and severe postoperative complications. This review deals with the pathogenesis, prevention and treatment of adverse events that may occasionally be life threatening. PPH and STARR carry the expected morbidity following anorectal surgery, such as bleeding, strictures and fecal incontinence. Complications that are particular to these stapled procedures are rectovaginal fistula, chronic proctalgia, total rectal obliteration, rectal wall hematoma and perforation with pelvic sepsis often requiring a diverting stoma. A higher complication rate and worse results are expected after PPH for fourth-degree piles. Enterocele and anismus are contraindications to PPH and STARR and both operations should be used with caution in patients with weak sphincters. In conclusion, complications after PPH and STARR are not infrequent and may be difficult to manage. However, if performed in selected cases by skilled specialists aware of the risks and associated diseases, some complications may be prevented.

Postoperative complications after procedure for prolapsed hemorrhoids (PPH) and stapled transanal rectal resection (STARR) procedures

Procedure for prolapsing hemorrhoids (PPH) and stapled transanal rectal resection for obstructed defecation (STARR) carry low postoperative pain, but may be followed by unusual and severe postoperative complications. This review deals with the pathogenesis, prevention and treatment of adverse events that may occasionally be life threatening. PPH and STARR carry the expected morbidity following anorectal surgery, such as bleeding, strictures and fecal incontinence. Complications that are particular to these stapled procedures are rectovaginal fistula, chronic proctalgia, total rectal obliteration, rectal wall hematoma and perforation with pelvic sepsis often requiring a diverting stoma. A higher complication rate and worse results are expected after PPH for fourth-degree piles. Enterocele and anismus are contraindications to PPH and STARR and both operations should be used with caution in patients with weak sphincters. In conclusion, complications after PPH and STARR are not infrequent and may be difficult to manage. However, if performed in selected cases by skilled specialists aware of the risks and associated diseases, some complications may be prevented.

Rectal diverticulum: a new complication of STARR procedure for obstructed defecation

We report a case of rectal diverticulum developed after stapled transanal rectal resection (STARR) procedure for obstructed defecation. A 21-year-old woman with chronic constipation was diagnosed with a rectocele at defecography. The patient underwent STARR procedure. Six months later, she presented with severe constipation requiring enemas and a worse condition than that preoperatively. Defecography and rectoscopy revealed a rectal wall diverticulum cavity with incomplete elimination of barium enema. The patient underwent transanal diverticulectomy and direct rectal wall repair. STARR procedure can produce new and difficult-to-treat complications and should be reserved for expert colorectal surgeons with proved familiarity in transanal surgery.

Procedure for Prolapsed Hemorrhoids for Treatment of Rectal Mucosa Prolapse following Anorectoplasty for Imperforate Anus

Surgical management of imperforate anus and rectal mucosal prolapse has evolved significantly over the last two decades. The procedure for prolapsed hemorrhoids (PPH) is now widely used primarily for rectal mucosal prolapse and internal hemorrhoids. We describe the use of PPH in the management of symptomatic rectal mucosal prolapse in a 39-year-old man with a history of a high imperforate anus and pelvic floor reconstruction. At 4-year follow up, the prolapse has not recurred and the preoperative symptoms have resolved. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report on the use of a PPH in the management of rectal mucosal prolapse in a patient with these characteristics.

Decision-making algorithm for the STARR procedure in obstructed defecation syndrome: position statement of the group of STARR Pioneers

Internal rectal prolapse (rectal intussusception) and rectocele are frequent clinical findings in patients suffering from refractory constipation that may be best characterized as obstructive defecation syndrome. However, there is still no clear evidence whether the stapled transanal rectal resection (STARR) procedure provides a safe and effective surgical option for symptom resolution in patients with obstructive defecation syndrome, as evidence-based guidelines and functional long-term results are still missing. On the basis of the need for objective evaluation, a European group of experts was founded (Stapled Transanal Rectal Resection Pioneers). Derived from 2 meetings (October 26-28, 2006, Gouvieux, France and November 28-29, 2007, St Gallen, Switzerland) a concept for treatment options in patients suffering from obstructive defecation syndrome was developed, including a clear decision-making algorithm specifically focusing on the role of the stapled transanal rectal resection procedure based on clinical symptoms and dynamic imaging and inclusion and exclusion criteria for the stapled transanal rectal resection procedure.

Postoperative complications after procedure for prolapsed hemorrhoids (PPH) and stapled transanal rectal resection (STARR) procedures

Procedure for prolapsing hemorrhoids (PPH) and stapled transanal rectal resection for obstructed defecation (STARR) carry low postoperative pain, but may be followed by unusual and severe postoperative complications. This review deals with the pathogenesis, prevention and treatment of adverse events that may occasionally be life threatening. PPH and STARR carry the expected morbidity following anorectal surgery, such as bleeding, strictures and fecal incontinence. Complications that are particular to these stapled procedures are rectovaginal fistula, chronic proctalgia, total rectal obliteration, rectal wall hematoma and perforation with pelvic sepsis often requiring a diverting stoma. A higher complication rate and worse results are expected after PPH for fourth-degree piles. Enterocele and anismus are contraindications to PPH and STARR and both operations should be used with caution in patients with weak sphincters. In conclusion, complications after PPH and STARR are not infrequent and may be difficult to manage. However, if performed in selected cases by skilled specialists aware of the risks and associated diseases, some complications may be prevented.

Results, outcome predictors, and complications after stapled transanal rectal resection for obstructed defecation

PURPOSE

Obstructed defecation may be treated by stapled transanal rectal resection, but different complications and recurrence rates have been reported. The present study was designed to evaluate stapled transanal rectal resection results, outcome predictive factors, and nature of complications.

METHODS

Clinical and functional data of 123 patients were retrospectively analyzed. All patients had symptoms of obstructed defecation before surgery and had rectocele and/or intussusception. Of them, 85 were operated on by the authors and 38 were referred after stapled transanal rectal resection had been performed elsewhere.

RESULTS

At a median follow-up of 17 (range, 3-44) months, 65 percent of the patients operated on by the authors had subjective improvement. Recurrent rectocele was present in 29 percent and recurrent intussusception was present in 28 percent of patients. At univariate analysis, results were worse in those with preoperative digitation (P<0.01), puborectalis dyssynergia (P<0.05), enterocele (P<0.05), larger size rectocele (P<0.05), lower bowel frequency (P<0.05), and sense of incomplete evacuation (P<0.05). Bleeding was the most common perioperative complication occurring in 12 percent of cases. Reoperations were needed in 16 patients (19 percent): 9 for recurrent disease. In the 38 patients referred after stapled transanal rectal resection, the most common problems were perineal pain (53 percent), constipation with recurrent rectocele and/or intussusception (50 percent), and incontinence (28 percent). Of these patients, 14 (37 percent) underwent reoperations: 7 for recurrence. Three patients presented with a rectovaginal fistula. One other patient died for necrotizing pelvic fasciitis.

CONCLUSIONS

Stapled transanal rectal resection achieved acceptable results at the cost of a high reoperation rate. Patients with puborectalis dyssynergia and lower bowel frequency may do worse because surgery does not address the causes of their constipation. Patients with large rectoceles, enteroceles, digitation, and a sense of incomplete evacuation may have more advanced pelvic floor disease for which stapled transanal rectal resection, which simply removes redundant tissue, may not be adequate. This, together with the complications observed in patients referred after stapled transanal rectal resection, suggests that this procedure should be performed by colorectal surgeons and in carefully selected patients.

[Rare complication after STARR operation]

Longo's STARR operation is a new surgical technique for the management of obstructive defecation syndrome. A major advantage is the repair of rectocele and intussusception in a single transanal approach. Complications such as bleeding, infection, anal stenosis, and fistulas are known. In the described patient we detected a cavity in the spatium rectovaginale which was lined by rectum mucosa and connected to the rectum as a result of an incomplete resection of rectum wall and dilatation of the stapler suture. Recurrent stool incrustration in the cavity led to preformation of coproliths. We performed a modified Rehn-Delorme operation to resect the cavity. The STARR operation is a technique which should be used carefully and performed only by surgeons with experience and full knowledge of the potential complications.

A prospective evaluation of occult disorders in obstructed defecation using the 'iceberg diagram'

OBJECTIVE

Surgical treatment of constipation and obstructed defecation (OD) carries frequent recurrences, as OD is an 'iceberg syndrome' characterized by 'underwater rocks' or occult diseases which may affect the outcome of surgery. The aim of this study was to evaluate occult disorders, in order to alert the clinician of these and minimize failures.

METHOD

One hundred consecutive constipated patients with OD symptoms, 81 women, median age 52 years, underwent perineal examination, proctoscopy, anorectal manometry and anal/vaginal ultrasound (US). Anorectal physiology and imaging tests were also carried out when indicated, as well as psychological and urogynaecological consultations. Symptoms were graded using a modified 1-20 constipation score. Both evident (e.g. rectocele) and occult (e.g. anismus) diseases were prospectively evaluated using a novel 'iceberg diagram'. The type of treatment, whether conservative or surgical, was also recorded.

RESULTS

Fifty-four (54%) patients had both mucosal prolapse and rectocele. All patients had at least two occult OD-related diseases, 66 patients had at least three of them: anxiety-depression, anismus and rectal hyposensation were the most frequent (66%, 44% and 33%, respectively). The median constipation score was 11 (range 2-20), the median number of 'occult disorders' was 5 (range 2-8). Conservative treatment was carried out in most cases. Surgery was carried out in 14 (14%) patients.

CONCLUSION

The novel 'iceberg diagram' allowed the adequate evaluation of OD-related occult diseases and better selection of patients for treatment. Most were managed conservatively, and only a minority were treated by surgery.

A prospective evaluation of occult disorders in obstructed defecation using the 'iceberg diagram'

OBJECTIVE

Surgical treatment of constipation and obstructed defecation (OD) carries frequent recurrences, as OD is an 'iceberg syndrome' characterized by 'underwater rocks' or occult diseases which may affect the outcome of surgery. The aim of this study was to evaluate occult disorders in order to alert the clinician of these and minimize failures.

METHOD

One hundred consecutive constipated patients with OD symptoms, 81 female patients, median age 52 years, underwent perineal examination, proctoscopy, anorectal manometry, and anal/vaginal ultrasound. Anorectal physiology and imaging tests were also carried out when indicated, as well as psychological and urogynaecological consultation. Symptoms were graded using a modified 1-20 constipation score. Both evident (e.g. rectocele) and occult (e.g. anismus) diseases were prospectively evaluated using a novel 'iceberg diagram'. The type of treatment, whether conservative or surgical, was also recorded.

RESULTS

Fifty-four (54%) patients had both mucosal prolapse and rectocele. All patients had at least two occult OD-related diseases, 66 patients had at least three: anxiety-depression, anismus and rectal hyposensation were the most frequent (66%, 44% and 33% respectively). The median constipation score was 11 (range 2-20), the median number of 'occult disorders' was 5 (range 2-8). Conservative treatment was carried out in most patients. Surgery was carried out in 14 (14%) patients.

CONCLUSION

The novel 'iceberg diagram' allowed the adequate evaluation of OD-related occult diseases and better selection of patients for treatment. Most were managed conservatively, and only a minority were treated by surgery.

Consensus conference on the stapled transanal rectal resection (STARR) for disordered defaecation

An international working party was convened in Rome, Italy on 16-17 June, 2005, with the purpose of developing a consensus on the application of the circular stapling instrument to the treatment of certain rectal conditions, the so-called Stapled Transanal Rectal Resection (STARR). Since the procedure has been submitted to only limited objective analysis it was felt prudent to hold a meeting of interested individuals for the purpose of evaluating the current status and to make conclusions and recommendations concerning the applicability of this new approach.