1
|
An Update on the Clinical Efficacy and Safety of Collagen Injectables for Aesthetic and Regenerative Medicine Applications. Polymers (Basel) 2023; 15:polym15041020. [PMID: 36850304 PMCID: PMC9963981 DOI: 10.3390/polym15041020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/19/2022] [Revised: 01/19/2023] [Accepted: 02/13/2023] [Indexed: 02/22/2023] Open
Abstract
Soft tissues diseases significantly affect patients quality of life and usually require targeted, costly and sometimes constant interventions. With the average lifetime increase, a proportional increase of age-related soft tissues diseases has been witnessed. Due to this, the last two decades have seen a tremendous demand for minimally invasive one-step resolutive procedures. Intensive scientific and industrial research has led to the recognition of injectable formulations as a new advantageous approach in the management of complex diseases that are challenging to treat with conventional strategies. Among them, collagen-based products are revealed to be one of the most promising among bioactive biomaterials-based formulations. Collagen is the most abundant structural protein of vertebrate connective tissues and, because of its structural and non-structural role, is one of the most widely used multifunctional biomaterials in the health-related sectors, including medical care and cosmetics. Indeed, collagen-based formulations are historically considered as the "gold standard" and from 1981 have been paving the way for the development of a new generation of fillers. A huge number of collagen-based injectable products have been approved worldwide for clinical use and have routinely been introduced in many clinical settings for both aesthetic and regenerative surgery. In this context, this review article aims to be an update on the clinical outcomes of approved collagen-based injectables for both aesthetic and regenerative medicine of the last 20 years with an in-depth focus on their safety and effectiveness for the treatment of diseases of the integumental, gastrointestinal, musculoskeletal, and urogenital apparatus.
Collapse
|
2
|
Franklin H, Barrett AC, Wolf R. Identifying factors associated with clinical success in patients treated with NASHA(®)/Dx injection for fecal incontinence. Clin Exp Gastroenterol 2016; 9:41-7. [PMID: 27042136 PMCID: PMC4780737 DOI: 10.2147/ceg.s95238] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose Injection with the bulking agent consisting of non-animal stabilized hyaluronic acid/dextranomer (NASHA®/Dx) is well tolerated and efficacious for the treatment of fecal incontinence (FI); however, the patient population that may derive maximum benefit has not been established. This post hoc responder analysis assessed demographic and baseline characteristics predictive of responsiveness to NASHA/Dx treatment. Methods Adults with a Cleveland Clinic Florida fecal incontinence score (CCFIS) ≥10 were randomized to receive NASHA/Dx or sham treatment. The primary end point was response to treatment (ie, decrease from baseline of ≥50% in number of FI episodes) at 6 months; a prespecified secondary end point was change in fecal incontinence quality of life (FIQL) score at 6 months. Post hoc subgroup analyses were performed for baseline and demographic characteristics and prior FI treatments. Results Overall, response to treatment was significantly greater with NASHA/Dx versus sham injection (52.7% vs 32.1%; P=0.0089). All subgroups analyzed demonstrated evidence of improvement, favoring NASHA/Dx versus sham treatment for both response to treatment and change in the FIQL coping/behavior subscale score. For the primary end point, a significantly greater percentage of patients with CCFIS ≤15, FI symptoms ≤5 years’ duration, or obstetric causes of FI responded to NASHA/Dx treatment versus patients receiving sham treatment (51.1% vs 28.3%, P=0.0169; 55.4% vs 25.7%, P=0.0026; and 53.6% vs 23.1%, P=0.0191, respectively). The mean change in the FIQL coping/behavior score significantly favored NASHA/Dx versus sham treatment for patients with CCFIS ≤15 (P=0.0371), FI symptoms ≤5 years’ duration (P=0.0289), or obstetric causes of FI (P=0.0384). Patients without a history of specific FI treatments (eg, antidiarrheal medications, biofeedback, surgery) were more likely to respond to NASHA/Dx versus sham treatment for both end points. Conclusion Although all subgroups analyzed showed evidence of quantitative and qualitative benefit from NASHA/Dx therapy, patients with characteristics indicative of mild-to-moderate FI may exhibit the greatest benefit.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Howard Franklin
- Department of Medical Affairs, Salix, a Division of Valeant Pharmaceuticals North America LLC, Bridgewater, NJ, USA
| | - Andrew C Barrett
- Department of Medical Affairs, Salix, a Division of Valeant Pharmaceuticals North America LLC, Bridgewater, NJ, USA
| | - Ray Wolf
- Department of Medical Affairs, Valeant Pharmaceuticals North America LLC, Wilton Manors, FL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Montroni I, Wexner SD. Reoperative surgery for fecal incontinence. SEMINARS IN COLON AND RECTAL SURGERY 2015. [DOI: 10.1053/j.scrs.2015.09.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
|
4
|
Ratto C, Buntzen S, Aigner F, Altomare DF, Heydari A, Donisi L, Lundby L, Parello A. Multicentre observational study of the Gatekeeper for faecal incontinence. Br J Surg 2015; 103:290-9. [PMID: 26621029 PMCID: PMC5063193 DOI: 10.1002/bjs.10050] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2015] [Revised: 07/24/2015] [Accepted: 10/07/2015] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Background A variety of therapeutic approaches are available for faecal incontinence. Implantation of Gatekeeper™ prostheses is a new promising option. The primary endpoint of this prospective observational multicentre study was to assess the clinical efficacy of Gatekeeper™ implantation in patients with faecal incontinence. Secondary endpoints included the assessment of patients' quality of life, and the feasibility and safety of implantation. Methods Patients with faecal incontinence, with either intact sphincters or internal anal sphincter lesions extending for less than 60° of the anal circumference, were selected. Intersphincteric implantation of six prostheses was performed. At baseline, and 1, 3 and 12 months after implantation, the number of faecal incontinence episodes, Cleveland Clinic Faecal Incontinence, Vaizey and American Medical Systems, Faecal Incontinence Quality of Life Scale and Short Form 36 Health Survey scores were recorded. Endoanal ultrasonography was performed at baseline and follow‐up. Results Fifty‐four patients were implanted. After Gatekeeper™ implantation, incontinence to gas, liquid and solid stool improved significantly, soiling was reduced, and ability to defer defaecation enhanced. All faecal incontinence severity scores were significantly reduced, and patients' quality of life improved. At 12 months, 30 patients (56 per cent) showed at least 75 per cent improvement in all faecal incontinence parameters, and seven (13 per cent) became fully continent. In three patients a single prosthesis was extruded during surgery, but was replaced immediately. After implantation, prosthesis dislodgement occurred in three patients; no replacement was required. Conclusion Anal implantation of the Gatekeeper™ in patients with faecal incontinence was effective and safe. Clinical benefits were sustained at 1‐year follow‐up. GatekeeperTM effective
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C. Ratto
- Proctology Unit, Department of Surgical SciencesCatholic UniversityRomeItaly
| | - S. Buntzen
- Department of Surgery PAarhus University HospitalAarhusDenmark
| | - F. Aigner
- Department of Visceral, Transplant and Thoracic SurgeryInnsbruck Medical UniversityInnsbruckAustria
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant SurgeryCharité Universitätsmedizin BerlinCampus Virchow‐KlinikumBerlinGermany
| | - D. F. Altomare
- Department of Emergency and Organ Transplantation, General Surgery UnitUniversity of BariBariItaly
| | - A. Heydari
- Department of General SurgeryNuovo Ospedale Civile Sant'Agostino EstenseModenaItaly
| | - L. Donisi
- Proctology Unit, Department of Surgical SciencesCatholic UniversityRomeItaly
| | - L. Lundby
- Department of Surgery PAarhus University HospitalAarhusDenmark
| | - A. Parello
- Proctology Unit, Department of Surgical SciencesCatholic UniversityRomeItaly
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Meyer I, Richter HE. An Evidence-Based Approach to the Evaluation, Diagnostic Assessment and Treatment of Fecal Incontinence in Women. CURRENT OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY REPORTS 2014; 3:155-164. [PMID: 25505643 PMCID: PMC4258837 DOI: 10.1007/s13669-014-0085-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Fecal incontinence (FI) is a debilitating disorder which negatively impacts quality of life. The etiology is often multifactorial and although most women with FI are able to be treated, many remain untreated because a significant proportion of women do not report their symptoms and seek care. The evaluation and treatment of FI can be also hindered by a lack of understanding of the mechanisms and current options. This article provides a review on the evidence-based evaluation and management for FI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Isuzu Meyer
- Division of Urogynecology and Pelvic Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, 1700 6th Avenue South, Suite 10382, Birmingham, AL 35233, ,
| | - Holly E Richter
- Division of Urogynecology and Pelvic Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, 1700 6th Avenue South, Suite 10382, Birmingham, AL 35233, ,
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Olsson F, Berterö C. Living with faecal incontinence: trying to control the daily life that is out of control. J Clin Nurs 2014; 24:141-50. [PMID: 24894099 DOI: 10.1111/jocn.12617] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/24/2014] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
AIMS AND OBJECTIVES To identify and describe the lived experience of persons living with faecal incontinence and show how it affects daily life. BACKGROUND Faecal incontinence is a relatively common condition, with a prevalence ranging from 3-24%, not differing between men and women. There is an under-reporting due to patients' reluctance to talk about their symptoms and consult healthcare professionals about their problems, which means that problems related to faecal incontinence are often underestimated. Living with faecal incontinence affects the quality of life negatively and has a negative impact on family situations, social interaction, etc. DESIGN A qualitative interpretative study based on interviews. METHODS In-depth interviews were conducted with five informants, all women, living with faecal incontinence. The interviews were transcribed verbatim and analysed using interpretive phenomenological analysis. RESULTS The analysis identified four themes: self-affirmation, guilt and shame, limitations in life and personal approach. The themes differ from each other, but are related and have similarities. The results show different aspects of living with faecal incontinence and how they affected daily life. CONCLUSIONS Living with faecal incontinence is a complex problem affecting everyday life in a number of different ways. It is a highly distressing and socially incapacitating problem. Living with faecal incontinence is about trying to control the daily life which is out of control. Living with faecal incontinence cannot be generalised as individuals experience the situation in unique ways. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE By gaining insight into the experience of living with faecal incontinence, healthcare professionals can deepen their understanding of this complex problem and thereby better address it and provide more individually based care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Frida Olsson
- Department of Surgery, Uppsala University Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden
| | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Kaiser AM, Orangio GR, Zutshi M, Alva S, Hull TL, Marcello PW, Margolin DA, Rafferty JF, Buie WD, Wexner SD. Current status: new technologies for the treatment of patients with fecal incontinence. Surg Endosc 2014; 28:2277-301. [PMID: 24609699 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-014-3464-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/13/2013] [Accepted: 01/28/2014] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Fecal incontinence is a frequent and debilitating condition that may result from a multitude of different causes. Treatment is often challenging and needs to be individualized. During the last several years, new technologies have been developed, and others are emerging from clinical trials to commercialization. Although their specific roles in the management of fecal incontinence have not yet been completely defined, surgeons have access to them and patients may request them. The purpose of this project is to put into perspective, for both the patient and the practitioner, the relative positions of new and emerging technologies in order to propose a treatment algorithm.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andreas M Kaiser
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, 1441 Eastlake Avenue, Suite 7418, Los Angeles, CA, 90033, USA,
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Lightner DJ, Fox JA. Bulking agents for urinary incontinence: patient selection, counseling and technique. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2014. [DOI: 10.1586/eog.09.38] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
|
9
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND Fecal incontinence is a distressing condition that is difficult to treat. Injection of bulking agents has been used to treat passive fecal incontinence. However, no long-term results are available. OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to assess the long-term clinical effectiveness of intra-anal injection of collagen for passive fecal incontinence. DESIGN This research is a retrospective cohort study from a prospectively collected database SETTING This investigation took place in a high-volume tertiary colorectal department. PATIENTS All patients who underwent intra-anal injection of collagen for passive fecal incontinence with internal sphincter dysfunction between January 2006 and December 2009 were included in the study. Data including demographic details, preoperative anorectal physiology, and outcome measures were collected prospectively and maintained in a database MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES The primary outcomes measured were the Cleveland Clinic Florida incontinence score and the responses to a subjective patient satisfaction questionnaire before the procedure and at subsequent follow-up visits. Data were analyzed by using SPSS v19.0. RESULTS One hundred patients (70 female; mean age, 61 years (range, 36-82)) were followed up for a minimum duration of 36 months. Fifty-six patients (56%) had an improvement in fecal incontinence score from a mean of 14 (range, 9-18) to a mean of 8 (range, 5-14). A total of 68% reported subjective improvement in symptoms. Thirty-eight patients (38%) required a repeat injection of collagen, and a further 15 patients required a third injection. The median interval between the first and final injection was 12 months (range, 4-16 months). Age was the only independent predictor of successful outcome (p = 0.032). There was no morbidity. LIMITATIONS This study was limited by its nonrandomized retrospective design. CONCLUSIONS Injection of collagen into the internal anal sphincter is simple, safe, and effective in patients with passive fecal incontinence, although repeat injections are necessary in approximately half of the patients.
Collapse
|
10
|
Maeda Y, Laurberg S, Norton C. Perianal injectable bulking agents as treatment for faecal incontinence in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013:CD007959. [PMID: 23450581 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd007959.pub3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 55] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Faecal incontinence is a complex and distressing condition with significant medical and social implications. Injection of perianal bulking agents has been used to treat the symptoms of passive faecal incontinence. However, various agents have been used without a standardised technique and the supposed benefit of the treatment is largely anecdotal with a limited clinical research base. OBJECTIVES To determine the effectiveness of perianal injection of bulking agents for the treatment of faecal incontinence in adults. SEARCH METHODS We searched the Cochrane Incontinence Group Specialised Register of trials (25 May 2012), ZETOC (3 May 2012), clinical trials registries (3 May 2012) and the reference lists of relevant articles. SELECTION CRITERIA All randomised or quasi-randomised controlled trials comparing the use of injectable bulking agents for faecal incontinence with any alternative treatments or placebo were reviewed to evaluate the therapeutic effects. Case-control and cohort studies were also reviewed to assess risks and complications associated with the treatments. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Two review authors (YM and CN) assessed the methodological quality of eligible trials and independently extracted data from the included trials using a range of pre-specified outcome measures. MAIN RESULTS Five eligible randomised trials with a total of 382 patients were identified. Four of the trials were at an uncertain or high risk of bias.Most trials reported a short term benefit from injections regardless of the material used, including placebo saline injection. One study demonstrated dextranomer in stabilised hyaluronic acid (NASHA Dx) to be more effective than sham injection but with more adverse effects. Dextranomer in stabilised hyaluronic acid (NASHA Dx) was better than sham injections at six months (65/136, 48% versus 48/70, 69% participants not improved, defined as less than 50% reduction in incontinence episodes, RR 0.70, 95% CI 0.55 to 0.88; with more incontinence free days (3.1 days compared with 1.7 in the sham treatment group, MD 1.40 days, 95% CI 0.33 to 2.47). Another study comparing silicone material (PTQ™) to saline injections was too small to demonstrate a clinical benefit compared to the control injection of normal saline.A silicone biomaterial (PTQ™) was shown to provide some advantages and was safer in treating faecal incontinence than carbon-coated beads (Durasphere®) in the short term.Similarly, there were short term benefits from injections delivered under ultrasound guidance compared with digital guidance.No long term evidence on outcomes was available and further conclusions were not warranted from the available data. None of the studies reported patient evaluation of outcomes and thus it is difficult to gauge whether the improvement in incontinence scores matched practical symptom improvements that mattered to the patients. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS One large randomised controlled trial has shown that this form of treatment using dextranomer in stabilised hyaluronic acid (NASHA Dx) improves continence for a little over half of patients in the short term. However, the number of identified trials was limited and most had methodological weaknesses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yasuko Maeda
- Sir Alan Park’s Physiology Unit, St Mark’s Hospital, Harrow, UK.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Abstract
The aim of this review was to assess and evaluate reports of studies on the efficacy of anal bulking agents used in the treatment of faecal incontinence. A systematic review of the literature was carried out to identify studies that have reported on the use of anal bulking agents. A variety of biomaterials have been employed for anal bulking. These include autologous fat, bovine glutaraldehyde cross-linked collagen, carbon-coated zirconium oxide beads, dextranomer microspheres in a gel, hydrogel cross-linked with polyacrylamide, polydimethylsiloxane elastomer in a gel, porcine dermal collagen and synthetic calcium hydroxylapatitie ceramic microspheres. Although the ideal site of injection (submucosal or intramuscular) and the mechanism of action remain the subject of debate, most published studies report a significant improvement in continence in at least 50% of subjects with mild to moderate symptoms with little or no associated morbidity.We concluded that anal bulking agents may be used to alleviate symptoms of faecal seepage and soilage.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- N F S Watson
- The John Goligher Colorectal Unit, St James's University Hospital, Leeds, UK
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Hussain ZI, Lim M, Mussa H, Abbas K, Stojkovic S. The use of Permacol® injections for the treatment of faecal incontinence. Updates Surg 2012; 64:289-95. [PMID: 22948797 DOI: 10.1007/s13304-012-0176-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/12/2012] [Accepted: 07/30/2012] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
The aim of this study is to assess the safety and efficacy of Permacol(®) implant for the treatment of idiopathic faecal incontinence using a novel injection technique. Patients with idiopathic passive faecal incontinence were selected for trans-submucosal injection of Permacol(®) after assessment by anorectal physiology and endoanal ultrasonography. Clinical assessment and St. Mark's Incontinence Score were used to evaluate efficacy before and at two time points (1 and 2 years) after treatment. Rockwood Score were also used to determine quality of life before and after treatment. The Friedman and Chi-square tests were used to compare continuous and categorical data, respectively. A p value of <0.05 was deemed significant. Thirty-eight patients (24 female), median age 66 years, were recruited. At maximum clinical follow-up (median of 9 months), response to Permacol(®) injections was categorised as excellent, good, fair and poor in 12, 5, 4 and 17 patients, respectively. St. Mark's Score improved in 72 and 63 % of patients at 1 and 2 years, respectively. However, a smaller proportion of patients (39 and 27 %, respectively) achieved a 50 %, or more, improvement in Mark's Score. All four domains of Rockwood Quality of Life Score improved on first and second year follow-up, however, only two domains, coping and embarrassment, were statistically significant. Permacol(®) injection improved symptoms by >50 % in 39 and 27 % of patients on short and medium-term follow-ups, respectively. The trans-submucosal technique for injection of Permacol(®) in this study was safe with no significant adverse outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zeiad I Hussain
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, York Teaching Hospital, 1 Celtic Close, York, YO26 5QJ, UK.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Affiliation(s)
- Oliver Schwandner
- Department of Proctology, Clinic of General and Visceral Surgery, Brothers of Mercy Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Fecal incontinence is a common condition, which leads to impaired quality of life and huge financial cost at an individual and societal level. Recent studies have identified novel and potentially modifiable risk factors. Newer diagnostic modalities are giving more detailed information about underlying disorders, helping to implement targeted treatment. Many therapeutic options exist, and newer treatments are changing outcomes. This article will review recent developments in mechanisms, diagnosis, and treatment of fecal incontinence. RECENT FINDINGS Potentially modifiable risk factors have recently been identified, and should translate to changes in clinical practice and hopefully patient outcomes. These include diarrhea, smoking, and dietary fiber. Advances have been made in anatomical and physiological testing of the anorectum and this may assist in clarifying the diagnosis and guiding management. The long-term benefit of biofeedback has been questioned but patient selection may be key. Novel pharmacological therapies (e.g., clonidine) and minimally invasive surgical procedures are changing outcomes in well selected patients. The development of a magnetic anal sphincter may add a new management alternative in patients who are refractory to conservative management. SUMMARY Fecal incontinence remains a clinical challenge. Only a minority of persons with fecal incontinence seek treatment, but for those who do, improved understanding of risk factors coupled with diagnostic techniques and treatments are improving outcomes.
Collapse
|
15
|
Leung FW. Treatment of fecal incontinence - review of observational studies (OS) and randomized controlled trials (RCT) related to injection of bulking agent into peri-anal tissue. JOURNAL OF INTERVENTIONAL GASTROENTEROLOGY 2011; 1:202-206. [PMID: 22586538 DOI: 10.4161/jig.1.4.19952] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2010] [Accepted: 12/16/2011] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE: Novel treatments are needed to augment medical therapy for fecal incontinence. METHODS: Medline and Google search (fecal incontinence and injection treatment), English publications. RESULTS: Twenty-two observational studies and 4 randomized controlled trials were identified. OS mostly with limited sample sizes reported promising results. Repeated injection was necessary in some patients. Effect on anal sphincter pressures was highly variable. Significant improvements in the length of anal high-pressure zone, asymmetry index and maximum tolerable rectal volume were suggested. Four randomized controlled trials (n=176) revealed: 1. Short-term benefits from injection of Bioplastique under ultrasound guidance compared with digital guidance; 2. Silicone biomaterial (PTQ) provided some advantages and was safer than carbon-coated beads (Durasphere); 3. PTQ did not demonstrate clinical benefit compared to control injection of saline; 4. There was significant improvement at 6 weeks post injection, but no difference between Bulkamid and Permacol. A 2010 Cochrane review, however, noted that these data were inconclusive due to limited number and methodological weaknesses. CONCLUSION: Further studies are warranted to assess patient-centered outcomes (e.g. adequate relief) in addition to the attenuation of severity of incontinence symptoms in ambulatory patients. In nursing home residents, cost-effectiveness studies combining injection treatment and prompted voiding (to mitigate constraints of immobility and dementia) in preventing peri-anal skin complications deserves to be considered.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Felix W Leung
- Medical and Research Services, Sepulveda Ambulatory Care Center, Veterans Affairs Greater Los Angels Healthcare System and David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, North Hills, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Ratto C, Parello A, Donisi L, Litta F, De Simone V, Spazzafumo L, Giordano P. Novel bulking agent for faecal incontinence. Br J Surg 2011; 98:1644-52. [PMID: 21928378 PMCID: PMC3229845 DOI: 10.1002/bjs.7699] [Citation(s) in RCA: 42] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 08/04/2011] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Various injectable bulking agents have been used for the treatment of faecal incontinence (FI). However, encouraging early results are not maintained over time. This study aimed to assess short- and medium-term results of a new bulking agent for the treatment of FI. METHODS The Gatekeeper(™) prosthesis comprises a thin solid polyacrylonitrile cylinder that becomes thicker, shorter and softer within 24 h after implantation. Fourteen patients with FI underwent treatment with Gatekeeper(™) under local anaesthesia. Four prostheses were implanted in the intersphincteric space in each patient, under endoanal ultrasound guidance. Number of episodes of major FI, Cleveland Clinic FI score (CCFIS), Vaizey score, anorectal manometry, endoanal ultrasonography (EUS), health status and quality of life (Short Form 36 and Faecal Incontinence Quality of Life questionnaires) were assessed before and after treatment. RESULTS Mean(s.d.) follow-up was 33·5(12·4) months. There were no complications. There was a significant decrease in major FI episodes from 7·1(7·4) per week at baseline to 1·4(4·0), 1·0(3·2) and 0·4(0·6) per week respectively at 1-month, 3-month and last follow-up (P = 0·002). CCFIS improved significantly from 12·7(3·3) to 4·1(3·0), 3·9(2·6) and 5·1(3·0) respectively (P < 0·001), and Vaizey score from 15·4(3·3) to 7·1(3·9), 4·7(3·0) and 6·9(5·0) respectively (P = 0·010). Soiling and ability to postpone defaecation improved significantly, and patients reported significant improvement in health status and quality of life. At follow-up, manometric parameters had not changed and EUS did not demonstrate any prosthesis dislocation. CONCLUSION The Gatekeeper(™) anal implant seemed safe, reliable and effective. Initial clinical improvement was maintained over time, and follow-up data were encouraging.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C Ratto
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Catholic University, Rome, Italy.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
Hussain ZI, Lim M, Stojkovic SG. Systematic review of perianal implants in the treatment of faecal incontinence. Br J Surg 2011; 98:1526-36. [PMID: 21964680 DOI: 10.1002/bjs.7645] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/02/2011] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Injectable bulking agents have been used with varying success for the treatment of faecal incontinence. This systematic review aimed to investigate the various injectable agents and techniques used for the treatment of faecal incontinence, and to assess their safety and efficacy. METHODS Thirty-nine publications were identified and studied. The following variables were pooled for univariable analysis: type, location, route of bulking agents, and the use of ultrasound guidance, antibiotics, laxatives and anaesthetics. Predictors of the development of complications and successful outcomes were identified by multivariable logistic regression analysis. RESULTS A total of 1070 patients were included in the analysis. On multivariable analysis, the only significant predictor of the development of complications was the route of injection of bulking agents (odds ratio 3·40, 95 per cent confidence interval 1·62 to 7·12; P = 0·001). Two variables were significant predictors of a successful short-term outcome: the use of either PTQ(®) (OR 5·93, 2·21 to 16·12; P = 0·001) or Coaptite(®) (OR 10·74, 1·73 to 65·31; P = 0·001) was associated with a greater likelihood of success. Conversely, the use of local anaesthetic was associated with a lower likelihood of success (OR 0·18, 0·05 to 0·59; P = 0·005). Failure to use laxatives in the postoperative period resulted in a poorer medium- to longer-term outcome (OR 0·13, 0·06 to 0·25; P = 0·001). CONCLUSION This systematic review has identified variations in the practice of injection of bulking agents that appear to influence the likelihood of complications and affect the outcomes after treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Z I Hussain
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, York Teaching Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Wigginton Road, York YO26 5QJ, UK.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
18
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND Anal manometry is routinely used in the assessment of the anal sphincters in patients with fecal incontinence or suspected sphincter injury. Such physiological information is complementary to the anatomical assessment provided by anal endosonography. The evolution of 3-dimensional anal endosonography provides more diagnostically useful information in complex cases. Vector volume manometry has been developed to give a 3-dimensional view of the anal sphincters. OBJECTIVE We reviewed the published literature on this technique, with the intention of deriving a system of standardization based on the published literature and to summarize the derivation and physiological meaning of the parameters measurable by vector volume studies, as well. DATA SOURCES We undertook a MEDLINE search using the terms "vector volume" or "vector manometry" and "anal canal." We also reviewed further publications found from references cited in the original articles identified from the above search. STUDY SELECTION Only English language articles of studies performed on humans were reviewed. INTERVENTION Anal canal vector volume manometry was the intervention. RESULTS With the development of automated puller systems and associated software, parameters such as total vector volume, maximum pressure, mean pressure, anal canal symmetry, anal canal length, and the length of the high-pressure zone can be readily calculated. LIMITATIONS There are conflicting studies related to the clinical value of both anal manometry and vector volume manometry, in part, because of the lack of standardization of equipment and technique. CONCLUSIONS The vector volume parameters have been shown to correlate with both imaging results and incontinence scores with automated puller systems. The clinical utility of vector volume manometry would be improved further by the standardization of equipment and technique. The main clinical utility may lie in the treatment selection and preoperative assessment of patients awaiting surgery for anal pathology that has yet to be evaluated.
Collapse
|
19
|
An Open-Label, Noncomparative, Multicenter Study to Evaluate Efficacy and Safety of NASHA/Dx Gel as a Bulking Agent for the Treatment of Fecal Incontinence. Gastroenterol Res Pract 2010; 2010:467136. [PMID: 21234379 PMCID: PMC3017894 DOI: 10.1155/2010/467136] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/12/2010] [Revised: 10/01/2010] [Accepted: 11/04/2010] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Fecal incontinence (FI) is the involuntary loss of rectal contents through the anal canal. Reports of its prevalence vary from 1–21%. Studies, have demonstrated a positive effect on FI symptoms with injectable bulking agents. This study evaluated the safety and efficacy of NASHA/Dx gel in the treatment of FI. One hundred fifteen eligible patients suffering from FI received 4 injections of 1 mL NASHA/Dx gel. Primary efficacy was based on data from 86 patients that completed the study. This study demonstrated a ≥50% reduction from baseline in the number of FI episodes in 57.1% of patients at 6 months, and 64.0% at 12 months. Significant improvements (P < .001) were also noted in total number of both solid and loose FI episodes, FI free days, CCFIS, and FIQL scores in all 4 domains. The majority of the treatment related AEs (94.9%) were mild or moderate intensity, and (98.7%) of AEs resolved spontaneously, or following treatment, without sequelae. Results of this study indicate NASHA/Dx gel was efficacious in the treatment of FI. Treatment effect was significant both in reduction of number of FI episodes and disease specific quality of life at 6 months and lasted up to 12 months after treatment.
Collapse
|
20
|
Maeda Y, Laurberg S, Norton C. Perianal injectable bulking agents as treatment for faecal incontinence in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2010:CD007959. [PMID: 20464759 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd007959.pub2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 47] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Faecal incontinence is a complex and distressing condition with significant medical and social implications. Injection of perianal bulking agents has been used to treat the symptoms of passive faecal incontinence. However, various different agents have been used without a standardised technique and the supposed benefit of the treatment is largely pragmatic with a limited clinical research base. OBJECTIVES To determine the effectiveness of perianal injection of bulking agents for the treatment of faecal incontinence in adults. SEARCH STRATEGY We searched the Cochrane Incontinence Group Specialised Register of trials (searched 10 June 2009), ZETOC (searched 18 July 2009), clinical trials registries (searched 18 July 2009) and the reference lists of relevant articles. SELECTION CRITERIA All randomised or quasi-randomised controlled trials comparing use of injectable bulking agents for faecal incontinence with any alternative treatments or placebo were reviewed to evaluate the therapeutic effects. Case-control and cohort studies were also reviewed to assess risks and complications associated with the treatment. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Two reviewers assessed the methodological quality of eligible trials and independently extracted data from included trials using a range of pre-specified outcome measures. MAIN RESULTS Four eligible randomised trials were identified with a total of 176 patients. All trials but one were at an uncertain or high risk of bias. Most trials reported a short term benefit from injections regardless of the material used as outcome measures improved over time. A silicone biomaterial (PTQ), was shown to provide some advantages and was safer in treating faecal incontinence than carbon-coated beads (Durasphere(R)) in the short term. Similarly, there were short term benefits from injections delivered under ultrasound guidance compared with digital guidance. However, PTQ did not demonstrate obvious clinical benefit compared to control injection of normal saline. No long term evidence on outcomes was available and further conclusions were not warranted from the available data. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS A definitive conclusion cannot be drawn regarding the effectiveness of perianal injection of bulking agents for faecal incontinence due to the limited number of identified trials together with methodological weaknesses. Within the available data, however, we found no reliable evidence for effectiveness of one treatment over another in improving faecal incontinence. Larger well-designed trials with adequate numbers of subjects using reliable validated outcome measures are needed to allow definitive assessment of the treatment for both effectiveness and safety.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yasuko Maeda
- Surgical Research Unit, Aarhus University Hospital, Tage-Hansens Gade 2, Aarhus, Denmark, 8000
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
21
|
Luo C, Samaranayake CB, Plank LD, Bissett IP. Systematic review on the efficacy and safety of injectable bulking agents for passive faecal incontinence. Colorectal Dis 2010; 12:296-303. [PMID: 19320664 DOI: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2009.01828.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/20/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to systematically review all published evidence to determine the efficacy and safety of injectable bulking agents for passive faecal incontinence (FI) in adults. METHOD Electronic searches were performed for MEDLINE, EMBASE, ISI Web of Knowledge and other relevant databases. Hand searching of relevant conference proceedings was undertaken. Studies were considered if they met the predefined inclusion criteria of more than ten adult patients and receiving an injectable bulking agent for passive FI with a validated means of assessing preoperative and postoperative incontinence. RESULTS Thirteen case series studies and one randomized placebo-controlled trial (RCT) were included with a total of 420 patients. Two completed RCTs with placebo control were identified but results were unobtainable. Coaptite, Contigen, Durasphere, EVOH and PTQ injections were assessed with 24, 73, 83, 21 and 208 patients respectively. Most studies reported a statistically significant improvement in incontinence scores and quality of life. No statistically significant difference was found between the treatment and placebo arms in the RCT. No serious adverse events were reported. CONCLUSIONS Currently there is little evidence for the effectiveness of injectable bulking agents in managing passive FI. The inability to obtain results from two further RCTs concerned the reviewers and hindered their ability to make strong recommendations. The identified injectable bulking agents appear to be safe with only minor complications reported.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C Luo
- Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
22
|
Shawki S, Wexner SD. Newer Concepts in Fecal Incontinence: Injectables and Sacral Nerve Stimulation. SEMINARS IN COLON AND RECTAL SURGERY 2010. [DOI: 10.1053/j.scrs.2009.10.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
|
23
|
|
24
|
Thekkinkattil DK, Dunham RJ, O'Herlihy S, Finan PJ, Sagar PM, Burke DA. Measurement of anal cushions in idiopathic faecal incontinence. Br J Surg 2009; 96:680-4. [PMID: 19384910 DOI: 10.1002/bjs.6597] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Faecal incontinence affects a heterogeneous population and aetiology can be multifactorial. In a subset of patients the aetiology remains idiopathic despite standard investigations. Anal cushions are important in normal continence, but have rarely been studied. The aim of this study was to measure the size of the anal cushions and to evaluate their role in patients with idiopathic faecal incontinence. METHODS Women in whom idiopathic faecal incontinence was diagnosed after standard anorectal investigations underwent transvaginal ultrasonography. The area of the anal cushions was measured and a cushion : canal (C : C) ratio derived, which was compared with that in a control group of women without faecal incontinence. RESULTS Some 21 patients with incontinence (median age 60 years) and 102 asymptomatic controls (median age 41 years) underwent scanning. The median (interquartile range) C : C ratio in the symptomatic group was significantly lower than that for controls (0.57 (0.54-0.66) versus 0.68 (0.61-0.73) respectively; P = 0.001). C : C ratio was not influenced by age (r = 0.023, P = 0.821). CONCLUSION The C : C ratio was reduced in patients with idiopathic faecal incontinence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D K Thekkinkattil
- Leeds General Infirmary, Great George St, Leeds LS1 3EX, UK. [corrected]
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
25
|
Danielson J, Karlbom U, Sonesson AC, Wester T, Graf W. Submucosal injection of stabilized nonanimal hyaluronic acid with dextranomer: a new treatment option for fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 2009; 52:1101-6. [PMID: 19581853 DOI: 10.1007/dcr.0b013e31819f5cbf] [Citation(s) in RCA: 43] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/20/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE NASHA Dx gel has been used extensively for treatments in the field of urology. This study was performed to evaluate NASHA Dx gel as an injectable anal canal implant for the treatment of fecal incontinence. METHODS Thirty-four patients (5 males, 29 females; median age, 61 years; range, 34 to 80) were injected with 4 x 1 ml of NASHA Dx gel, just above the dentate line in the submucosal layer. The primary end point was change in the number of incontinence episodes and a treatment response was defined as a 50 percent reduction compared with pretreatment. All patients were followed up at 3, 6, and 12 months. RESULTS The median number of incontinence episodes during four weeks was 22 (range, 2 to 77) before treatment, at 6 months it was 9 (range, 0 to 46), and at 12 months it was 10 (range, 0 to 70, P = 0.004). Fifteen patients (44 percent) were responders at 6 months, compared with 19 (56 percent) at 12 months. No long-term side effects or serious adverse events were reported. CONCLUSIONS Submucosal injection of NASHA Dx gel is an effective treatment for fecal incontinence. The effect is sustained for at least 12 months. The treatment is associated with low morbidity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Johan Danielson
- Department of Surgery, Akademiska Sjukhuset, Uppsala, Sweden.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
26
|
Pinto RA, Sands DR. Surgery and sacral nerve stimulation for constipation and fecal incontinence. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am 2009; 19:83-116, vi-vii. [PMID: 19232283 DOI: 10.1016/j.giec.2008.12.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
Fecal continence is a complex bodily function, which requires the interplay of sensation, rectal capacity, and anal neuromuscular function. Fecal incontinence affects approximately 2% of the population and has a prevalence of 15% in elderly patients. Constipation is one of the most common gastrointestinal disorders. The variety of symptoms and risk factors suggest a multifactorial origin. Before any invasive intervention, the surgeon should have a thorough understanding of the etiology of these conditions. Appropriate medical management can improve symptoms in the majority of patients. Surgery is indicated when all medical possibilities are exhausted. This review discusses the most used surgical procedures emphasizing the latest experiences. Sacral nerve stimulation (SNS) is a promising option for patients with fecal incontinence and constipation. The procedure affords patients improved continence and quality of life. The mechanism of action is still poorly understood. This treatment has been used before in other more invasive surgical procedures or even after their failure to improve patients' symptoms and avoid a definitive stoma. Before any invasive intervention, the surgeon should have a thorough understanding of the etiology of these conditions. Appropriate medical management can improve symptoms in the majority of patients. Surgery is indicated when all medical possibilities are exhausted. This review discusses the most used surgical procedures emphasizing the latest experiences. Sacral nerve stimulation (SNS) is a promising option for patients with fecal incontinence and constipation. The procedure affords patients improved continence and quality of life. The mechanism of action is still poorly understood. This treatment has been used before in other more invasive surgical procedures or even after their failure to improve patients' symptoms and avoid a definitive stoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rodrigo A Pinto
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Florida, 2950 Cleveland Clinic Boulevard, Weston, FL 33331, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
27
|
Smart N, Mercer-Jones M. Response to Y. Maeda, C. J. Vaizey & M. A. Kamm. Pilot study of two new injectable bulking agents for the treatment of faecal incontinence. Colorectal Dis 2008; 10:628; author reply 628-9. [PMID: 18266883 DOI: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2008.01475.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
|
28
|
Ganio E, Marino F, Giani I, Luc AR, Clerico G, Novelli E, Trompetto M. Injectable synthetic calcium hydroxylapatite ceramic microspheres (Coaptite) for passive fecal incontinence. Tech Coloproctol 2008; 12:99-102. [DOI: 10.1007/s10151-008-0406-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/19/2007] [Accepted: 04/03/2008] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
|
29
|
Thekkinkattil DK, Lim M, Stojkovic SG, Finan PJ, Sagar PM, Burke D. A classification system for faecal incontinence based on anorectal investigations. Br J Surg 2007; 95:222-8. [DOI: 10.1002/bjs.5933] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Faecal incontinence is a socially disabling condition that affects a heterogeneous population of patients. There is no standardization of investigations, and treatment outcomes are variable. The major limitation for comparing the results from different studies is the lack of a pretreatment classification of incontinence. The aim of this study was to review the anorectal investigation findings and propose a simple, repeatable classification for faecal incontinence.
Methods
Patients who had anorectal investigations for defaecatory disorders from February 2000 to September 2006 were analysed retrospectively. All patients had anorectal manometry, anal mucosal electrosensitivity testing and endoanal ultrasonography.
Results
Of a total of 1294 patients, 135 were excluded, leaving 1159 (460 continent and 699 incontinent) for analysis. The patients were divided into four groups: traumatic incontinence, neuropathic faecal incontinence, combined faecal incontinence and idiopathic faecal incontinence. The manometric variables and demographics were distinct in these groups.
Conclusion
Patients with faecal incontinence can be classified into different groups with distinct pathophysiological variables. Such a classification system will enable comparison and interpretation of the outcomes of different studies and also help in the selection of patients for appropriate treatments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D K Thekkinkattil
- Division of Coloproctology, The General Infirmary at Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - M Lim
- Division of Coloproctology, The General Infirmary at Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - S G Stojkovic
- Division of Coloproctology, The General Infirmary at Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - P J Finan
- Division of Coloproctology, The General Infirmary at Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - P M Sagar
- Division of Coloproctology, The General Infirmary at Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - D Burke
- Division of Coloproctology, The General Infirmary at Leeds, Leeds, UK
| |
Collapse
|