Improved National Results With Simultaneous Liver-Kidney Transplantation Using Donation After Circulatory Death Donors

Previous large registry studies have demonstrated inferior outcomes for simultaneous liver-kidney transplantation (SLKT) recipients of grafts from donation after circulatory death (DCD) donors compared with those from donation after brain death (DBD) donors in the era from 2000 to 2010. Given the improving national results in liver transplantation alone using grafts from DCD donors, the present study aimed to investigate if results with DCD-SLKT have improved in the modern era. Patients undergoing SLKT between 2000 and 2018 were obtained from the United Network for Organ Sharing Standard Analysis and Research file and divided into 2 eras based on the date of SLKT: era 1 (2000-2010) and era 2 (2011-2018). Improvement in DCD-SLKT patient, liver graft, and kidney graft survival rates was seen between era 1 and era 2 (P < 0.001). Concurrently, there was a decrease in the proportion of critically ill (P = 0.02) and retransplant (P = 0.006) candidates undergoing DCD-SLKT. When DCD-SLKT in era 2 was compared with a propensity-matched cohort of DBD-SLKT in era 2, no differences in patient (P = 0.99), liver graft (P = 0.19), or kidney graft (P = 0.90) survival were observed. In addition, both bilirubin (0.5 versus 0.5 mg/dL; P = 0.86) and creatinine (1.2 versus 1.2 mg/dL; P = 0.68) at last follow-up were not different between the DCD-SLKT and DBD-SLKT patients in era 2. In conclusion, in the most recent era, patients undergoing DCD-SLKT were able to achieve similar outcomes compared with matched patients undergoing DBD-SLKT. DCD-SLKT represents a viable option for appropriately selected recipients.

Enhanced immunosuppression improves early allograft function in a porcine kidney transplant model of donation after circulatory death

It remains controversial whether renal allografts from donation after circulatory death (DCD) have a higher risk of acute rejection (AR). In the porcine large animal kidney transplant model, we investigated the AR and function of DCD renal allografts compared to the non-DCD renal allografts and the effects of increased immunosuppression. We found that the AR was significantly increased along with elevated MHC-I expression in the DCD transplants receiving low-dose immunosuppression; however, AR and renal function were significantly improved when given high-dose immunosuppressive therapy postoperatively. Also, high-dose immunosuppression remarkably decreased the mRNA levels of ifn-g, il-6, tgf-b, il-4, and tnf-a in the allograft at day 5 and decreased serum cytokines levels of IFN-g and IL-17 at day 4 and day 5 after operation. Furthermore, Western blot analysis showed that higher immunosuppression decreased phosphorylation of signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 and nuclear factor kappa-light-chain-enhancer of activated B cells-p65, increased phosphorylation of extracellular-signal-regulated kinase, and reduced the expression of Bcl-2-associated X protein and caspase-3 in the renal allografts. These results suggest that the DCD renal allograft seems to be more vulnerable to AR; enhanced immunosuppression reduces DCD-associated AR and improves early allograft function in a preclinical large animal model.

Hydrogen sulfide prevents renal ischemia-reperfusion injury in CLAWN miniature swine

BACKGROUND

Hydrogen sulfide (H₂S) has recently been reported to demonstrate both antiinflammatory and cytoprotective effects; however, its efficacy has not been well documented in large animal models. In this study, we examined whether the administration of H₂S offers cytoprotective effects on renal ischemia-reperfusion injury (IRI) in a preclinical miniature swine model.

METHODS

Major histocompatibility complex-inbred, CLAWN miniature swine (n = 9) underwent a right nephrectomy, followed by induction of a 120-min period of warm ischemia via placement of clamps on the left renal artery and vein. Group 1 (n = 3) underwent renal ischemia without H₂S administration. Groups 2 (n = 3) and 3 (n = 3) received Na₂S (prodrug of H₂S) 10 min before reperfusion of the ischemic kidneys followed by a 30-min of Na₂S postreperfusion intravenously (group 2) or selective administration of Na₂S via the left renal artery (group 3). IRI was assessed by kidney biopsies, levels of inflammatory cytokines in sera and kidney tissue.

RESULTS

Animals in group 1 had significantly higher serum creatinine levels compared with animals in groups 2 and 3 (P < 0.01). Histology showed severe tubular damage with TUNEL-positive cells in group 1 on postoperative day 2 compared with mild damage in group 2 and minimal damage in group 3. Furthermore, levels of inflammatory cytokines in both serum (interleukin-6 [IL-6], tumor necrosis factor-α, and high-mobility group box 1) and renal tissue (IL-1 and IL-6) in group 3 were markedly lower than in group 2, suggesting beneficial effects of selective Na₂S administration.

CONCLUSIONS

Na₂S administration, especially via an organ selective approach, appears to potentially offer cytoprotective and antiinflammatory effects following renal IRI.

The viability of transplanting organs from donors who underwent cardiopulmonary resuscitation: A systematic review

AIMS

To identify reports of patients who underwent cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) prior to solid organ donation and compare recipient and organ function outcomes to those that did not undergo CPR. Donation after restoration of circulation then progressing to death and those donating with on-going CPR who would have otherwise have termination of efforts were both included.

METHODS

Systematic review. Clinical studies comparing the outcome of patients and organs retrieved from donors who underwent CPR with those that did not require CPR. Full-text articles were searched on EmBASE, MEDLINE, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews and the Cochrane Register of Controlled Trials.

RESULTS

Twenty-two observational studies were included. There were 12,206 adult and 2552 paediatric organ transplantation identified. Comparing donation after restoration of circulation there was no difference in immediate, one year, and five-year graft function. Donation with on-going CPR was associated with reduced immediate graft function for both renal and hepatic transplantation, however long term function was not different.

CONCLUSIONS

CPR does not appear to adversely affect graft function. Patients who have restored circulation after resuscitation and subsequently progress to death should be evaluated for organ donation. Those with on-going CPR should be considered for hepatic and renal transplantation but there may be worse initial graft function.

Successful transplantation of kidneys from elderly circulatory death donors by using microscopic and macroscopic characteristics to guide single or dual implantation

Most kidneys from potential elderly circulatory death (DCD) donors are declined. We report single center outcomes for kidneys transplanted from DCD donors over 70 years old, using preimplantation biopsy Remuzzi grading to inform implantation as single or dual transplants. Between 2009 and 2012, 43 single transplants and 12 dual transplants were performed from elderly DCD donors. Remuzzi scores were higher for dual than single implants (4.4 vs. 3.4, p < 0.001), indicating more severe baseline injury. Donor and recipient characteristics for both groups were otherwise similar. Early graft loss from renal vein thrombosis occurred in two singly implanted kidneys, and in one dual-implanted kidney; its pair continued to function satisfactorily. Death-censored graft survival at 3 years was comparable for the two groups (single 94%; dual 100%), as was 1 year eGFR. Delayed graft function occurred less frequently in the dual-implant group (25% vs. 65%, p = 0.010). Using this approach, we performed proportionally more kidney transplants from elderly DCD donors (23.4%) than the rest of the United Kingdom (7.3%, p < 0.001), with graft outcomes comparable to those achieved nationally for all deceased-donor kidney transplants. Preimplantation biopsy analysis is associated with acceptable transplant outcomes for elderly DCD kidneys and may increase transplant numbers from an underutilized donor pool.

Recommendations for donation after circulatory death kidney transplantation in Europe

Donation after circulatory death (DCD) donors provides an invaluable source for kidneys for transplantation. Over the last decade, we have observed a substantial increase in the number of DCD kidneys, particularly within Europe. We provide an overview of risk factors associated with DCD kidney function and survival and formulate recommendations from the sixth international conference on organ donation in Paris, for best-practice guidelines. A systematic review of the literature was performed using Ovid Medline, Embase and Cochrane databases. Topics are discussed, including donor selection, organ procurement, organ preservation, recipient selection and transplant management.

[Renal transplantation using a Maastricht category III non-heartbeating donor: First French experience and review of the literature]

In 2015, Annecy Hospital was the first French hospital to perform non-heartbeating organ donation from a Maastricht category III donor (patient awaiting cardiac arrest after withdrawal of treatment). Non-heartbeating organ donation (NHBD), performed in France since 2006, had initially excluded this category, due to ethical questions concerning end of life and treatment withdrawal, as well as technical specificities linked to this procedure. Grenoble University Hospital and Edouard-Herriot Hospital in Lyon then performed the first kidney transplants, with satisfactory outcomes in both recipients. This article presents the details and results of this new experience, challenging both on a deontological and organizational level. Functional outcomes of kidney grafts from NHBD are now well known in the literature and confirm their benefit for patients, with similar results to those from heartbeating donors (HBD). International experiences concerning specifically Maastricht category III NHBD are encouraging and promising.

Early graft loss after kidney transplantation: risk factors and consequences

Early graft loss (EGL) after kidney transplantation is a catastrophic outcome that is assumed to be more likely after the use of kidneys from suboptimal donors. We therefore examined its incidence, risk factors and consequences in our center in relation to different donor types. Of 801 recipients who received a kidney-only transplant from deceased donors, 50 (6.2%) suffered EGL within 30 days of transplantation. Significant risks factors for EGL were donation after circulatory death (DCD) (odds ratio [OR] 2.88; p = 0.006), expanded criteria donor (ECD) transplantation (OR 4.22; p = 0.010), donor age (OR 1.03; p = 0.044) and recipient past history of thrombosis (OR 4.91; p = 0.001). Recipients with EGL had 12.28 times increased risk of death within the first year, but long-term survival was worse for patients remaining on the waiting list. In comparison with patients on the waiting list but not transplanted, and with all patients on the waiting list, the risk of death after EGL decreased to baseline 4 and 23 months after transplantation, respectively. Our findings suggest that DCD and ECD transplantation are significant risk factors for EGL, which is a major risk factor for recipient death. However, long-term mortality is even greater for those remaining on the waiting list.

Baseline donor chronic renal injury confers the same transplant survival disadvantage for DCD and DBD kidneys

Histological assessment of baseline chronic kidney injury may discriminate kidneys that are suitable for transplantation, but has not been validated for appraisal of donation after circulatory death (DCD) kidneys. 'Time-zero' biopsies for 371 consecutive, solitary, deceased-donor kidneys transplanted at our center between 2006 and 2010 (65.5% DCD, 34.5% donation after brain death [DBD]) were reviewed and baseline chronic degenerative injury scored using Remuzzi's classification. High scores correlated with donor age and extended criteria donors (42% of donors), but the spectrum of scores was similar for DCD and DBD kidneys. Transplant outcomes for kidneys scoring from 0 to 4 were comparable (1 and 3 year graft survival 95% and 92%), but were much poorer for kidneys scoring ≥5, with 1 year graft survival only 73%, and 12.5% suffering primary nonfunction. Critically, high Remuzzi scores conferred the same survival disadvantage for DCD and DBD kidneys. On multi-variable regression analysis, time-zero biopsy score was the only independent predictor for graft survival, whereas one-year graft estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) correlated with donor age and biopsy score. In conclusion, the relationship between severity of chronic kidney injury and transplant outcome is similar for DCD and DBD kidneys. Kidneys with Remuzzi scores of ≤4 can be implanted singly with acceptable results.

More donors or more delayed graft function? A cost-effectiveness analysis of DCD kidney transplantation

Expansion of the donor pool with expanded criteria donors and donation after cardiac death (DCD) donors is essential. DCD grafts result in increased rates of primary non-function (PNF) and delayed graft function (DGF). However, long-term patient and graft survival is similar between donation after brain death (DBD) donors and DCD donors. The aim of this study was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of the use of DCD donors. A Markov-based decision analytic model was created to simulate outcomes for two wait list strategies: (i) wait list composed of only DBD organs and (ii) wait list combining DBD and DCD organs. Baseline values and ranges were determined from the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients (SRTR) database and literature review. Sensitivity analyses were conducted to test model strength and parameter variability. The wait list strategy consisting of DBD donors only provided recipients 5.4 Quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) at $65 000/QALY, whereas a wait list strategy combining DBD + DCD donors provided recipients 6.0 QALYs at a cost of $56 000/QALY. Wait lists with DCD donors provide adequate long-term survival despite more DGF. This equates to an improvement in quality of life and decreased cost when compared to remaining on dialysis for any period of time.

Immunotherapy for acute kidney injury

Acute renal failure, now referred to as acute kidney injury, is a common and clinically important problem. Acute kidney injury frequently occurs as a result of acute tubular necrosis (ATN), which is often caused by a reduction in systemic blood pressure or renal blood flow (e.g., as observed in severe sepsis or during renal transplantation). The disease course in ATN is variable, including prolonged dialysis-dependence and chronic renal dysfunction, but there is currently no specific therapy for ATN. There is increasing evidence that the inflammatory response in ATN significantly contributes to disease severity and outcome. In this review, we summarize recent developments in the understanding of how the immune system responds to dying cells, and the relevance of these discoveries to ATN. In particular, NLRP3 inflammasome activation and IL-1β-mediated neutrophil recruitment are likely to play a key role and may provide novel therapeutic targets for immunotherapy in ATN.

Kidney damage during organ recovery in donation after circulatory death donors: data from UK National Transplant Database

During the last 10 years, kidneys recovered/transplanted from donors after circulatory death (DCD) have significantly increased. To optimize their use, there has been an urgent need to minimize both warm and cold ischemia, which often necessitates more rapid removal. To compare the rates of kidney injury during procurement from DCD and donors after brain death (DBD) organ donors. A total of 13 260 kidney procurements were performed in the United Kingdom over a 10-year period (2000-2010). Injuries occurred in 903 procedures (7.1%). Twelve thousand three hundred seventy-two (93.3%) kidneys were recovered from DBD donors and 888 (6.7%) from DCD donors. The rates of kidney injury were significantly higher when recovered from DCD donors (11.4% vs. 6.8%, p < 0.001). Capsular, ureteric and vascular injuries were all significantly more frequent (p = 0.002, p < 0.001 and p = 0.017, respectively). Discard because of injury was more common after DCD donation (p = 0.002). Multivariate analysis demonstrated procurement injuries were significantly associated with DCD donors (p = 0.035) and increased donor age (<0.001) and donor body mass index (BMI; 0.001), donor male gender (p = 0.001) and no liver donation (0.009). We conclude that procurement from DCD donors leads to higher rates of injury to the kidney and are more likely to be discarded.

Outcomes of simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation from brain-dead and controlled circulatory death donors

BACKGROUND

Organ scarcity has prompted increased use of organs from donation after circulatory death (DCD) donors. An early single-centre experience of simultaneous pancreas-kidney (SPK) transplantation from controlled DCD donors is described here.

METHODS

Outcomes of SPK transplants from DCD and donation after brain death (DBD) donors between August 2008 and January 2011 were reviewed retrospectively.

RESULTS

SPK transplants from 20 DCD and 40 DBD donors were carried out. Donor and recipient characteristics were similar for both groups, although pancreas cold ischaemia times were shorter in DCD recipients: median (range) 8·2 (5·9-10·5) versus 9·5 (3·8-12·5) h respectively (P = 0·004). Median time from treatment withdrawal to cold perfusion was 24 (range 16-110) min for DCD donors. There were no episodes of delayed pancreatic graft function in either group; the graft thrombosis rates were both 5 per cent. Similarly, there were no differences in haemoglobin A1c level at 12 months: median (range) 5·4 (4·9-7·7) per cent in DCD group versus 5·4 (4·1-6·2) per cent in DBD group (P = 0·910). Pancreas graft survival rates were not significantly different, with Kaplan-Meier 1-year survival estimates of 84 and 95 per cent respectively (P = 0·181).

CONCLUSION

DCD SPK grafts had comparable short-term outcomes to DBD grafts, even when procured from selected donors with a prolonged agonal phase.

Expansion of the kidney donor pool by using cardiac death donors with prolonged time to cardiorespiratory arrest

Donation after Cardiac Death (DCD) is an increasingly important source of kidney transplants, but because of concerns of ischemic injury during the agonal phase, many centers abandon donation if cardiorespiratory arrest has not occurred within 1 h of controlled withdrawal of life-supporting treatment (WLST). We report the impact on donor numbers and transplant function using instead a minimum 'cut-off' time of 4 h. The agonal phase of 173 potential DCD donors was characterized according to the presence or absence of: acidemia; lactic acidosis; prolonged (>30 min) hypotension, hypoxia or oliguria, and the impact of these characteristics on 3- and 12-month transplant outcome evaluated by multivariable regression analysis. Of the 117 referrals who became donors, 27 (23.1%) arrested more than 1 h after WLST. Longer agonal-phase times were associated with greater donor instability, but surprisingly neither agonal-phase instability nor its duration influenced transplant outcome. In contrast, 3- and 12-month eGFR in the 190 transplanted kidneys was influenced independently by donor age, and 3-month eGFR by cold ischemic time. DCD kidney numbers are increased by 30%, without compromising transplant outcome, by lengthening the minimum waiting time after WLST from 1 to 4 h.

Impact of age matching of donors to recipients on renal transplant outcomes following donation after cardiac death

Organ donation after cardiac death (DCD) provides a valuable supply of grafts for renal transplantation. Age matching of donors to recipients is often used. We sought to determine the impact of age matching on the outcomes among our cohort of DCD renal transplant recipients. Using our institutional database, we gathered information on all DCD renal transplants performed between April 2002 and December 2009. We divided the cohort into two groups based upon the donor:recipient age ratio: age-matched (between 25th and 75th percentiles, n = 99) and non-age-matched (<25th percentile and >75th centile, n = 100). We failed to demonstrate any significant difference between the two groups in terms of early complications or long-term outcome or function. Age matching did not appear to affect graft outcomes, particularly for young donors, but may have a role in older donors.

Contribution of donors after cardiac death to the deceased donor pool: 2002 to 2009 University of Liege experience

OBJECTIVE

In this study, we have evaluated the organ procurement and transplantation activity from donors after cardiac death (DCD) at our institution over an 8-year period. Our aim was to determine whether this program influenced transplantation programs, or donation after brain death (DBD) activity.

METHODS

We prospectively collected our procurement and transplantation statistics in a database for retrospective review.

RESULTS

We observed an increasing trend in potential and actual DCD number. The mean conversion rate turning potential into effective donors was 58.1%. DCD accounted for 16.6% of the deceased donor (DD) pool over 8 years. The mean age for effective DCD donors was 53.9 years (range, 3-79). Among the effective donors, 63.3% (n = 31) came from the transplant center and 36.7% (n = 18) were referred from collaborative hospitals. All donors were Maastricht III category. The number of kidney and liver transplants using DCD sources tended to increase. DCD kidney transplants represented 10.8% of the DD kidney pool and DCD liver transplants made up 13.9% of the DD liver pool over 8 years. The DBD program activity increased in the same time period. In 2009, 17 DCD and 33 DBD procurements were performed in a region with a little >1 million inhabitants.

CONCLUSION

The establishment of a DCD program in our institution enlarged the donor pool and did not compromise the development of the DBD program. In our experience, DCD are a valuable source for abdominal organ transplantation.

Comparable outcomes in donation after cardiac death and donation after brainstem death: a matched analysis of renal transplants

Donation after cardiac death (DCD) donors provide a valuable source of grafts for renal transplantation. They are exposed to an initial warm ischemic insult, which can affect early function. We sought to compare our initial DCD experience in renal transplantation with a case-matched donation after brain death (DBD) cohort from the same period. We included all DCD transplantations in the first 5 years of the program. A control DBD group was matched with a variety of donor and recipient factors. We demonstrated a significantly increased early dysfunction (DGF and primary nonfunction). DCD graft function was poorer than the DBD equivalent at 1- and 3-years. However, medium-term recipient and graft outcomes were comparable. DCD grafts continue to play a vital role in renal transplantation despite evidence of early graft dysfunction.

Predicting donor asystole following withdrawal of treatment in donation after cardiac death

Donation after cardiac death donation allows donor pool expansion. The period between withdrawal of treatment and donor a systole is extremely variable; its prolongation often results in unsuccessful organ procurement. We sought to assess a variety of donor variables to determine whether they predicted successful organ retrieval. We included all Donation after Cardiac Death (DCD) retrievals between 2002 and 2009, which were grouped as successful (n = 104) versus unsuccessful (n = 42). Factors that predicted unsuccessful organ procurement included older donor age, donor history of hypertension, higher at withdrawal, and absence of inotropic support. On multivariate analysis, mean arterial pressure retained its significance. Prediction of withdrawal-to-asystole time is complex, but our analysis suggested that donor blood pressure at withdrawal is an important predictor of whether retrieval would be successful.

Analysis of factors that affect outcome after transplantation of kidneys donated after cardiac death in the UK: a cohort study

BACKGROUND

A third of all kidneys from deceased donors in the UK are donated after cardiac death, but concerns have been raised about the long-term outcome of such transplants. We aimed to establish these outcomes for kidneys donated after controlled cardiac death versus brain death, and to identify the factors that affect graft survival and function.

METHODS

We used data from the UK transplant registry to select a cohort of deceased kidney donors and the corresponding transplant recipients (aged ≥18 years) for transplantations done between Jan 1, 2000, and Dec 31, 2007. Kaplan-Meier estimates were used to assess graft survival, and multivariate analyses were used to identify factors associated with graft survival and with long-term renal function, which was measured from estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR).

FINDINGS

9134 kidney transplants were done in 23 centres; 8289 kidneys were donated after brain death and 845 after controlled cardiac death. First-time recipients of kidneys from cardiac-death donors (n=739) or brain-death donors (n=6759) showed no difference in graft survival up to 5 years (hazard ratio 1·01, 95% CI 0·83 to 1·19, p=0·97), or in eGFR at 1-5 years after transplantation (at 12 months -0·36 mL/min per 1·73 m(2), 95% CI -2·00 to 1·27, p=0·66). For recipients of kidneys from cardiac-death donors, increasing age of donor and recipient, repeat transplantation, and cold ischaemic time of more than 12 h were associated with worse graft survival; grafts from cardiac-death donors that were poorly matched for HLA had an association with inferior outcome that was not significant, and delayed graft function and warm ischaemic time had no effect on outcome.

INTERPRETATION

Kidneys from controlled cardiac-death donors provide good graft survival and function up to 5 years in first-time recipients, and are equivalent to kidneys from brain-death donors. Allocation policy for kidneys from cardiac-death donors should reduce cold ischaemic time, avoid large age mismatches between donors and recipients, and restrict use of kidneys poorly matched for HLA in young recipients.

FUNDING

UK National Health Service Blood and Transplant, and Cambridge National Institute for Health Research Biomedical Research Centre.

Cold machine perfusion versus static cold storage of kidneys donated after cardiac death: a UK multicenter randomized controlled trial

One third of deceased donor kidneys for transplantation in the UK are donated following cardiac death (DCD). Such kidneys have a high rate of delayed graft function (DGF) following transplantation. We conducted a multicenter, randomized controlled trial to determine whether kidney preservation using cold, pulsatile machine perfusion (MP) was superior to simple cold storage (CS) for DCD kidneys. One kidney from each DCD donor was randomly allocated to CS, the other to MP. A sequential trial design was used with the primary endpoint being DGF, defined as the necessity for dialysis within the first 7 days following transplant. The trial was stopped when data were available for 45 pairs of kidneys. There was no difference in the incidence of DGF between kidneys assigned to MP or CS (58% vs. 56%, respectively), in the context of an asystolic period of 15 min and median cold ischemic times of 13.9 h for MP and 14.3 h for CS kidneys. Renal function at 3 and 12 months was similar between groups, as was graft and patient survival. For kidneys from controlled DCD donors (with mean cold ischemic times around 14 h), MP offers no advantage over CS, which is cheaper and more straightforward.