Circumferential resection margin as a prognostic factor in rectal cancer

The mode of circumferential margin involvement in rectal cancer determines its impact on outcomes: A population-based study

BACKGROUND

The clinical value of different modes of CRM involvement in rectal cancer patients is unclear. This study aims to determine the clinical impact of different modes of circumferential resection margin (CRM) involvement in patients with a locally advanced rectal carcinoma.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A cohort of patients who were diagnosed with stage III rectal cancer between June 2014 and June 2020 was selected from the prospective Dutch nationwide pathology databank (PALGA). Histopathological and clinical data were analyzed according to the nature of CRM involvement (via primary tumor invasion, lymph node metastasis, tumor deposit, multiple factors) and analyses on recurrence and overall survival (OS) were performed.

RESULTS

3020 patients were included, of whom 12.4 % had a positive CRM. The majority of these patients (63.2 %) had CRM involvement by primary tumor invasion and in 9 % of patients multiple factors caused the positive CRM. The rates of local recurrence and distant metastasis were related to the nature of the CRM involvement, with lowest rate for lymph node metastasis and highest rate for multiple factors. On multivariate analysis, CRM involvement by primary tumor invasion, tumor deposits and multiple factors, but not by lymph node metastasis, were associated with poor OS.

CONCLUSION

This nationwide population based study highlights the clinical importance of reporting the nature of CRM involvement in rectal cancer patients. Lymph node metastasis involving the CRM does not bear the same risks for local recurrence, distant metastases and OS as CRM involvement by primary tumor invasion or CRM involvement by multiple factors.

The Association of Mismatch Repair Status with Microscopically Positive (R1) Margins in Stage III Colorectal Cancer: A Retrospective Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

There is mounting evidence that microscopically positive (R1) margins in patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) may represent a surrogate for aggressive cancer biology rather than technical failure during surgery. However, whether detectable biological differences exist between CRC with R0 and R1 margins is unknown. We sought to investigate whether mismatch repair (MMR) status differs between Stage III CRC with R0 or R1 margins.

METHODS

Patients treated for Stage III CRC from January 1, 2016 to December 31, 2019 were identified by using the Danish Colorectal Cancer Group database. Patients were stratified according to MMR status (proficient [pMMR] vs. deficient [dMMR]) and margin status. Outcomes of interest included the R1 rate according to MMR and overall survival.

RESULTS

A total of 3636 patients were included, of whom 473 (13.0%) had dMMR colorectal cancers. Patients with dMMR cancers were more likely to be elderly, female, and have right-sided cancers. R1 margins were significantly more common in patients with dMMR cancers (20.5% vs. 15.2%, p < 0.001), with the greatest difference seen in the rate of R1 margins related to the primary tumour (8.9% vs. 4.7%) rather than to lymph node metastases (11.6% vs. 10.5%). This association was seen in both right- and left-sided cancers. On multivariable analyses, R1 margins, but not MMR status, were associated with poorer survival, alongside age, pN stage, perineural invasion, and extramural venous invasion.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with Stage III CRC, dMMR status is associated with increased risks of R1 margins following potentially curative surgery, supporting the use of neoadjuvant immunotherapy in this patient group.

A comparison of whole-mount and conventional sections for pathological mesorectal extension and circumferential resection margin assessment after total mesorectal excision

INTRODUCTION

The objective of the study is to compare 2 techniques for histological handling of rectal cancer specimens, namely whole-mount in a large block vs conventional sampling using small blocks, for mesorectal pathological assessment of circumferential resection margin status and depth of tumor invasion into the mesorectal fat.

METHODS

This is a prospective study including 27 total mesorectal excision specimens of rectal cancer from patients treated for primary rectal carcinoma between 2020 and 2022 in a specialized multidisciplinary Colorectal Unit. For each total mesorectal excision specimen, 2 contiguous representative tumoral slices were selected and comparatively analyzed with whole-mount and small blocks macroscopic dissection techniques, enabling comparison between them in the same surgical specimen. The agreement between the 2 techniques to assess the distance of the tumor from the circumferential resection margin as well as the depth of tumor invasion was evaluated with the Student's t-test for paired samples, Pearson's correlation coefficient, and the Bland-Altman method comparison analysis.

RESULTS

Complete mesorectal excision was observed in 8% of cases. Circumferential resection margin involvement was observed in only one case (4 %). The whole-mount and small block techniques obtained similar results when we assessed the distance to the circumferential resection margin (t-test P = 0.8, r = 0.92) and the depth of mesorectal infiltration (t-test P = 0.6, r = 0.95).

CONCLUSIONS

Both gross dissection techniques (whole-mount vs multiple small cassettes) are equivalent and reliable to assess the distance to circumferential resection margin and the depth of mesorectal infiltration in the mesorectal fat in rectal cancer staging.

[Robotic rectal surgery]

Colorectal cancer is one of the most frequent cancerous diseases in industrial nations, whereby tumors of the rectum constitute approximately 30-40% of all colorectal cancers. In addition to the implementation and establishment of novel neoadjuvant concepts for the treatment of rectal cancer, there has been a continuous evolution of surgical techniques in recent years towards minimally invasive surgery. In this respect robot-assisted surgery has become more and more popular despite seemingly weak evidence regarding clinical benefits and the not to be ignored economic aspects; however, recently published high-quality studies provide new evidence showing advantages for a robotic resection in patients suffering from rectal cancer. Thus, the progressive implementation of robotic surgical systems is increasingly attaining a scientific foundation.

Short-term outcomes of robotic tumor-specific mesorectal resection of rectal cancer: surgical techniques in mesorectal division using rolling division of the mesorectum

BACKGROUND

This study aims to report our surgical techniques for robot-assisted laparoscopic anterior resection, specifically focusing on mesorectal division using rolling division of the mesorectum, and to elucidate short-term outcomes at a single institution. Tumor-specific mesorectal excision (TSME) is commonly performed for resection of a tumor located in the upper rectum. However, especially in a narrow pelvis, it is difficult to perform appropriate mesorectal division at an adequate distance from the tumor in robot-assisted laparoscopic anterior resection.

METHODS

Retrospective case series of patients with rectal cancer who underwent robot-assisted TSME using rolling division of mesorectum. Patient characteristics, perioperative clinical results, surgical and pathological details were recorded.

RESULTS

A total of 198 patients underwent robot-assisted TSME for rectal cancer using rolling division of mesorectum between May 2019 and December 2023.The tumor was located in the upper rectum in 45 patients, middle rectum in 115 patients and lower rectum in 38 patients. The types of resections were 40 high anterior resection and 158 low anterior resections. The median operation time was 175 (range 109-310) min, and median mesorectal division time was 24 (range 15-45) min. Median blood loss was 3 (range 0-20) ml; no patients required blood transfusion. The overall complication rate of Clavien-Dindo classification grades I-IV was 7.1%. Anastomotic leakage was observed in two patients (1.0%) with grade III. There was no surgical mortality in this series.

CONCLUSION

This robotic technique for anterior resection is a feasible and reliable procedure for achieving sufficient and safe TSME in this cohort.

Predicting survival in locally advanced rectal cancer with effective chemoradiotherapy response

BACKGROUND

Locally advanced rectal cancer patients often display favorable responses and favorable oncologic outcomes. Due to the low recurrence rate, there is scarcity of studies investigating the prognostic factors influencing their survival. Therefore, our study sought to assess the prognostic factors associated with survival in rectal cancer patients who achieved either a pathologic complete response or a pathologic stage I after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy combined with radical resection.

METHODS

In this retrospective study, we analyzed data from cohort of 1394 patients diagnosed with locally advanced rectal cancer who underwent neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy combined with total mesorectal excision from January 2008 to April 2017. Finally, we selected 474 (34.2 %) who exhibited either a pathologic complete response or attained pathologic stage I following the treatment. Subsequently, we analyzed the prognostic factors influencing disease-free and overall survival.

RESULTS

A total of 161 (34 %) achieved a pathologic complete response. Our analysis revealed that circumferential resection margin and the administration of adjuvant chemotherapy were prognostic factors for disease-free survival (p = 0.011, p = 0.022). Furthermore, factors influencing overall survival included the clinical N stage and administration of adjuvant chemotherapy (p = 0.035, p = 0.015).

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, the circumferential resection margin, clinical N stage, and administration of adjuvant chemotherapy were prognostic factors for survival in patients showing good response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced rectal cancer. For patients with a positive circumferential resection margin and clinical N (+) stage, intensive follow-up might be needed to achieve favorable oncologic outcomes. Also, we recommend considering adjuvant chemotherapy as a beneficial treatment approach for these patients.

Oncologic outcomes of intersphincteric resection versus abdominoperineal resection for lower rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The efficacy of intersphincteric resection (ISR) surgery for patients with lower rectal cancer remains unclear compared to abdominoperineal resection (APR). The aim of this study is to compare the oncologic outcomes for lower rectal cancer patients after ISR and APR through a systematic review and meta-analysis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A systematic electronic search of the Cochrane Library, PubMed, EMBASE, and MEDLINE was performed through January 12, 2022. The primary outcomes included 5-year disease-free survival (5y-DFS) and 5-year overall survival. Secondary outcomes included circumferential resection margin involvement, local recurrence, perioperative outcomes, and other long-term outcomes. The pooled odds ratios, mean difference, or hazard ratios (HRs) of each outcome measurement and their 95% CIs were calculated.

RESULTS

A total of 20 nonrandomized controlled studies were included in the qualitative analysis, with 1217 patients who underwent ISR and 1135 patients who underwent APR. There was no significant difference in 5y-DFS (HR: 0.84, 95% CI: 0.55-1.29; P =0.43) and 5-year overall survival (HR: 0.93, 95% CI: 0.60-1.46; P =0.76) between the two groups. Using the results of five studies that reported matched T stage and tumor distance, we performed another pooled analysis. Compared to APR, the ISR group had equal 5y-DFS (HR: 0.76, 95% CI: 0.45-1.30; P =0.31) and 5y-LRFS (local recurrence-free survival) (HR: 0.72, 95% CI: 0.29-1.78; P =0.48). Meanwhile, ISR had equivalent local control as well as perioperative outcomes while significantly reducing the operative time (mean difference: -24.89, 95% CI: -45.21 to -4.57; P =0.02) compared to APR.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results show that the long-term survival and safety of patients is not affected by ISR surgery, although this result needs to be carefully considered and requires further study due to the risk of bias and limited data.

Evaluating the Role of Methylated Circulating Tumor DNA in Combination With Pathological Prognostic Factors for Predicting Recurrence of Colorectal Cancer

Background

Colorectal cancer (CRC) has a high rate of recurrence, in particular for advanced disease, but prognosis based on staging and pathology at surgery can have limited efficacy. The presence of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) at diagnosis could be used to improve the prediction for disease recurrence.

Objectives

To assess the impact of detecting methylated BCAT1/IKZF1 ctDNA at diagnosis in combination with demographic, lifestyle, clinical factors and tumor pathology, to assess predictive value for recurrence.

Design

A retrospective cohort study.

Methods

The cohort included 180 patients (36 with recurrent CRC), who had undergone complete treatment and surveillance for a minimum of 3 years. Participant clinical details and ctDNA methylated BCAT1/IKZF1 results were compared between those with and without recurrence, and cox regression analysis assessed each factor on disease-free survival.

Results

Clinical factors independently associated with reduced disease-free survival included nodal involvement (HR = 3.83, 95% CI 1.56-9.43, P = .003), M1 stage (HR = 4.41, 95% CI 1.18-16.45, P = .027), a resection margin less than 2 mm (HR = 4.60, 95% CI 1.19-17.76, P = .027), perineural involvement (HR = 2.50, 95% CI 1.01-6.17, P = .047) and distal tumors (HR = 3.13, 95% CI 1.07-9.18, P = .037). Methylated BCAT1/IKZF1 was detected in 51.7% (93/180) of pre-treatment plasma samples. When a positive ctDNA finding was considered in combination with these clinical prognostic factors, there was improved predictive power of recurrence for patients with perineural involvement (HR = 4.44, 95% CI 1.92-10.26, P < .001), and it marginally improved the predictive factor for M1 stage (HR = 7.59, 95% CI 2.30-25.07, P = .001) and distal tumors (HR = 5.04, 95% CI 1.88-13.49, P = .001).

Conclusions

Nodal invasion, metastatic disease, distal tumor site, low resection margins and perineural invasion were associated with disease recurrence. Pre-treatment methylated ctDNA measurement can improve the predictive value for recurrence in a subset of patients, particularly those with perineural involvement.

Registration

Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry #12611000318987.

Adoption of Total Neoadjuvant Therapy in the Treatment of Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer

Local and metastatic recurrence are primary concerns following the treatment of locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). Chemoradiation (CRT) can reduce the local recurrence rates and has subsequently moved to the neoadjuvant setting from the adjuvant setting. Pathological complete response (pCR) rates have also been noted to be greater in patients treated with neoadjuvant CRT prior to surgery. The standard approach to treating LARC would often involve CRT followed by surgery and optional adjuvant chemotherapy and remained the treatment paradigm for almost two decades. However, patients were often unable to complete adjuvant chemotherapy due to a decreased tolerance of chemotherapy following surgery, which led to upfront treatment with both CRT and chemotherapy, and total neoadjuvant therapy, or TNT, was created. The efficacy outcomes of local recurrence, disease-free survival, and pCR have improved in patients receiving TNT compared to the standard approach. Additionally, more recent data suggest a possible improvement in overall survival as well. Patients with a complete clinical response following TNT have the opportunity for watch-and-wait surveillance, allowing some patients to undergo organ preservation. Here, we discuss the clinical trials and studies that led to the adoption of TNT as the standard of care for LARC, with the possibility of watch-and-wait surveillance for patients achieving complete responses. We also review the possibility of overtreating some patients with LARC.

MRI in rectal cancer: An institutional real life analysis of technical parameters

INTRODUCTION

MRI plays a key role in the preoperative staging of rectal cancers and choice of neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy. Yet, the acquisition and interpretation of rectum magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) turn out to be unequal, impacting patients'care. The present study aims at evaluating the quality of the acquisition of technical parameters of the rectal MRI performed by comparing them according to the various guidelines.

METHODS

The medical MRI reports of all consecutive patients with locally advanced rectal cancer treated in a curative intent, by preoperative RCT and completion surgery were retrospectively reviewed over two periods (January 2010-December 2014 and January 2018 and December 2020) according to international 2012 and 2016 ESGAR and 2017 SAR MRI recommendation reports.

RESULTS

During the first period (69 MRI performed), 58% of these MRI abided by the recommendations and 75% of essential criteria could be found in 25.5% of MRI reportings. During the second period (73 MRI performed), the protocol used by 6.8% of MR images abided by the 2016 Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology (ESGAR) recommendations and 39.7% abided by the Society of Abdominal Radiology (SAR) recommendations. 75% of essential criteria could be found in 52.3% of MRI reportings and 90% of essential criteria could be found in 6.2% of MRI reportings.

DISCUSSION

In an era of increasing individualized patient care and conservative treatment focused on tumour response and prognostic factors, the present study showed that compliance to MRI protocols and reporting guidelines needs improving to upgrade patient care.

A prospective case series assessing the Imperial College London intraoperative radiotherapy protocol for advanced rectal cancer: an IDEAL phase 2a study

AIM

Intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) decreases local recurrence rates for advanced rectal cancer. Nevertheless, utilization of IORT is limited due to the associated logistical and financial challenges. The aim of this study is to describe the development and delivery of a novel IORT protocol for advanced rectal cancer that overcomes these difficulties in the context of the early phase of an IDEAL 2a study. The primary outcome measure was the ability to deliver IORT using this novel protocol with IORT-related toxicity as the secondary outcome measure.

METHOD

Consecutive patients with advanced rectal cancer expected to have involved (R1) resection margins were enrolled. After resection, 12 Gy low-energy photon IORT was delivered using the Axxent device with a custom-designed elliptical spherical balloon applicator.

RESULTS

Six patients with a median age of 47 years (range 33-88 years; five women) were enrolled between 2018 and 2019. The indication was advanced cancer in four patients and atypical invasive pelvic side wall lymph nodes in two. IORT was successfully delivered in all cases. No toxicity was encountered. Three advanced cancer patients had R1 resection and one had complete resection (R0); resection margin status could not be established for the two lymph node cases. Five patients were alive at 3.4 (2.9-4.1) year follow-up. None of the R1 cases recurred.

CONCLUSION

This is the first study to describe a novel IORT protocol using low-energy photon IORT for advanced rectal cancer. IORT could be delivered in all cases and no IORT-related toxicity was encountered. Available oncological outcome data are encouraging, but further studies will be necessary to determine the oncological effectiveness of this protocol.

Prognostic Value of the Circumferential Resection Margin After Curative Surgery for Rectal Cancer: A Multicenter Propensity Score-Matched Analysis

BACKGROUND

Recently, positive circumferential resection margin has been found to be an indicator of advanced disease with a high risk of distant recurrence rather than local recurrence.

OBJECTIVE

The study aimed to analyze the prognostic impact of the circumferential resection margin on long-term oncological outcomes in patients with rectal cancer.

DESIGN

This was a multicenter, propensity score-matched (2:1) analysis comparing the positive and negative circumferential resection margins.

SETTINGS

The study was conducted at 5 high-volume centers in Spain.

PATIENTS

Patients who underwent total mesorectal excision with curative intent for middle-low rectal cancer between 2006 and 2014 were included.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The main outcomes were local recurrence, distant recurrence, overall survival, and disease-free survival.

RESULTS

The unmatched initial cohort consisted of 1599 patients, of whom 4.9% had a positive circumferential resection margin. After matching, 234 patients were included (156 with a negative circumferential margin and 78 with a positive circumferential margin). The median follow-up period was 52.5 (22.0-69.5) months. Local recurrence was significantly higher in patients with a positive circumferential margin (33.3% vs 11.5%; p < 0.001). Distant recurrence was similar in both groups (46.2% vs 42.3%; p = 0.651). There were no statistically significant differences in 5-year overall survival (48.6% vs 43.6%; p = 0.14). Disease-free survival was lower in patients with a positive circumferential margin (36.1% vs 52.3%; p = 0.026).

LIMITATIONS

This study was limited by its retrospective design. The different neoadjuvant treatment options were not included in the propensity score.

CONCLUSIONS

The positive circumferential resection margin was associated with a higher local recurrence rate and worse disease-free survival in comparison with the negative circumferential resection margin. However, the positive circumferential resection margin was not a prognostic indicator of distant recurrence and overall survival. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B950 .

VALOR PRONSTICO DEL MARGEN DE RESECCIN CIRCUNFERENCIAL DESPUS DE LA CIRUGA CURATIVA PARA EL CNCER DE RECTO UN ANLISIS MULTICNTRICO EMPAREJADO POR PUNTAJE DE PROPENSIN

ANTECEDENTES:En los últimos años, se ha encontrado que el margen de resección circunferencial positivo es un indicador de enfermedad avanzada con alto riesgo de recurrencia a distancia más que de recurrencia local.OBJETIVO:El objetivo fue analizar el impacto pronóstico del margen de resección circunferencial sobre la recidiva local, a distancia y las tasas de supervivencia en pacientes con cáncer de recto.DISEÑO:Este fue un análisis multicéntrico emparejado por puntaje de propensión 2: 1 que comparó el margen de resección circunferencial positivo y negativo.AJUSTES:El estudio se realizó en 5 centros Españoles de alto volumen.PACIENTES:Se incluyeron pacientes sometidos a escisión total de mesorrecto con intención curativa por cáncer de recto medio-bajo entre 2006-2014. Las características clínicas e histológicas se utilizaron para el emparejamiento.PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE RESULTADO:Los resultadoes principales fueron la recurrencia local, la recurrencia a distancia, la supervivencia global y libre de enfermedad.RESULTADOS:La cohorte inicial no emparejada consistió en 1599 pacientes; El 4,9% tuvo un margen de resección circunferencial positivo. Tras el emparejamiento se incluyeron 234 pacientes (156 con margen circunferencial negativo y 78 con margen circunferencial positivo). La mediana del período de seguimiento fue de 52,5 meses (22,0-69,5). La recurrencia local fue significativamente mayor en pacientes con margen circunferencial positivo, 33,3% vs 11,5% [HR 3,2; IC 95%: 1,83-5,43; p < 0,001]. La recidiva a distancia fue similar en ambos grupos (46,2 % frente a 42,3 %) [HR 1,09, IC 95 %: 0,78-1,90; p = 0,651]. No hubo diferencias significativas en la supervivencia global a 5 años (48,6 % frente a 43,6 %) [HR 1,09, IC 95 %: 0,92-1,78; p = 0,14]; La supervivencia libre de enfermedad fue menor en pacientes con margen circunferencial positivo, 36,1% vs 52,3% [HR 1,5; IC 95%: 1,05-2,06; p = 0,026].LIMITACIONES:Este estudio estuvo limitado por el diseño retrospectivo. Las diferentes opciones de tratamientos neoadyuvantes no se han incluido en la puntuación de propensión.CONCLUSIONES:El margen de resección circunferencial positivo se asocia con una mayor tasa de recurrencia local y peor supervivencia libre de enfermedad en comparación con el margen de resección circunferencial negativo. Sin embargo, el margen de resección circunferencial positivo no fue un indicador pronóstico de recidiva a distancia ni de supervivencia global. Consulte el Video del Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B950 . (Traducción- Dr. Yesenia Rojas-Khalil ).

Circumferential Resection Margin is Associated With Distant Metastasis After Rectal Cancer Surgery: A Nation-wide Population-based Study Cohort

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate circumferential resection margin (CRM) as a risk factor for distant metastasis (DM) in rectal cancer.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

The treatment of rectal cancer has evolved over the last decades. Surgical radicality is considered the most important factor in preventing recurrences including local and distant. CRM ≤1.0 mm is considered to increase recurrence risk. This study explores the risk of DM in relation to exact CRM.

METHODS

All patients treated with abdominal resection surgery for rectal cancer between 2005 and 2013 in Sweden were eligible for inclusion in this retrospective study. Primary endpoint was DM.

RESULTS

Twelve thousand one hundred forty-six cases were identified. Eight thousand five hundred ninety-three cases were analyzed after exclusion. Seven hundred seventeen (8.6%) patients had CRM ≤1.0mm and 7577 (91.4%) patients had CRM >1.0 mm. DM recurrence rate at 5 years was 42.1% (95% CI 32.5-50.3), 31.5% (95% CI 27.3-35.5), 25.8% (95% Confidence Interval (CI) 16.2-34.4), and 19.5% (95% CI 18.5-19.5) when CRM was 0.0 mm, 0.1 to 1.0 mm, 1.1 to 1.9 mm, and CRM ≥2mm, respectively. Multivariable analysis revealed higher DM risk in CRM 0.0-1.0 mm versus >1.0 mm (hazard ratio 1.30, 95% CI 1.05-1.60; P = 0.015). No significant difference in DM risk in CRM 1.1-1.9 mm versus ≥2.0 mm (hazard ratio 0.66, 95% CI 0.34-1.28; P = 0.224) could be detected.

CONCLUSIONS

The risk of DM decreases with increasing CRM. Moreover, CRM ≤1.0 mm is a significant risk factor for DM. Thus, CRM is a dominant factor when discussing risk of DM after rectal cancer surgery.

Development and validation of a prognostic nomogram for rectal cancer patients who underwent surgical resection

Objective: The purpose of this study was to develop and validate a nomogram model for the prediction of survival outcome in rectal cancer patients who underwent surgical resection. Methods: A total of 9,919 consecutive patients were retrospectively identified using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Significant prognostic factors were determined by the univariate and multivariate Cox analysis. The nomogram model for the prediction of cancer-specific survival (CSS) in rectal cancer patients were developed based on these prognostic variables, and its predictive power was assessed by the concordance index (C-index). Calibration curves were plotted to evaluate the associations between predicted probabilities and actual observations. The internal and external cohort were used to further validate the predictive performance of the prognostic nomogram. Results: All patients from the SEER database were randomly split into a training cohort (n = 6,944) and an internal validation cohort (n = 2,975). The baseline characteristics of two cohorts was comparable. Independent prognostic factors were identified as age, pT stage, lymph node metastasis, serum CEA level, tumor size, differentiation type, perineural invasion, circumferential resection margin involvement and inadequate lymph node yield. In the training cohort, the C-index of the nomogram was 0.719 (95% CI: 0.696-0.742), which was significantly higher than that of the TNM staging system (C-index: 0.606, 95% CI: 0.583-0.629). The nomogram had a C-index of 0.726 (95% CI: 0.691-0.761) for the internal validation cohort, indicating a good predictive power. In addition, an independent cohort composed of 202 rectal cancer patients from our institution were enrolled as the external validation. Compared with the TNM staging system (C-index: 0.573, 95% CI: 0.492-0.654), the prognostic nomogram still showed a better predictive performance, with the C-index of 0.704 (95% CI: 0.626-0.782). Calibration plots showed a good consistency between predicted probability and the actual observation in the training and two validation cohorts. Conclusion: The nomogram showed an excellent predictive ability for survival outcome of rectal cancer patients, and it might provide an accurate prognostic stratification and help clinicians determine individualized treatment strategies.

How We Treat Localized Rectal Cancer-An Institutional Paradigm for Total Neoadjuvant Therapy

Total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT)-the neoadjuvant employment of radiotherapy (RT) or chemoradiation (CRT) as well as chemotherapy (CHT) before surgery-may lead to increased pathological complete response (pCR) rates as well as a reduction in the risk of distant metastases in locally advanced rectal cancer. Furthermore, increased response rates may allow organ-sparing strategies in a growing number of patients with low rectal cancer and upfront immunotherapy has shown very promising early results in patients with microsatellite instability (MSI)-high/mismatch-repair-deficient (dMMR) tumors. Despite the lack of a generally accepted treatment standard, we strongly believe that existing data is sufficient to adopt the concept of TNT and immunotherapy in clinical practice. The treatment algorithm presented in the following is based on our interpretation of the current data and should serve as a practical guide for treating physicians-without any claim to general validity.

Active surveillance in long period of total neoadjuvant therapy in rectal cancer: Early prediction of poor regression response

Aim

To analyze locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) patients and tumor characteristics during the period of total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT) and explore the risk factors that may predict poor tumor regression in response to TNT.

Materials and methods

The data of 120 LARC patients who received TNT from December 2016 and September 2019 in our hospital were retrospectively analyzed. The clinicopathological characteristics of patients with different tumor regression responses were compared. Then we divided patients into two groups according to the carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) clearance pattern after chemoradiation to explore risk factors that might predict the tumor regression response.

Results

Of 120 LARC patients, 34 (28.3%) exhibited poor regression. Stratified analysis by tumor response showed that patients with poor response to TNT were more likely to obtain elevated CEA during the course of TNT (all P < 0.05). For those with elevated pretreatment CEA, fewer patients with poor response obtained normal CEA after chemoradiation (13.6% vs. 72.7%, P < 0.001). Besides, less patients’ CEA levels in the poor response group decreased by greater than 50% after chemoradiation when compared with that in the good response group (18.2% vs. 60.6%, P = 0.002). Stratified analysis by CEA clearance pattern after chemoradiation showed patients who obtained an elevated pretreatment CEA and decreased by less than 50% after chemoradiation were more likely to have poor response to TNT compared to others (76.2% vs. 18.2%, P < 0.001). Logistic multivariate analysis revealed that cN2 (95% CI 1.553-16.448), larger tumors (95% CI 2.250-21.428) and CEA clearance pattern after chemoradiation (95% CI 1.062-66.992) were independent risk factors for poor tumor regression response.

Conclusion

Approximately one-fourth of LARC patients with TNT achieved a poor regression response. Here, cN2, larger tumor size before treatment and elevated CEA levels were considered predictive features of a poor response. Active surveillance of CEA levels during the TNT course are potentially important, and CEA levels after chemoradiation might have important implications for the tumor response to TNT.

Incidence, predictors and prognostic implications of positive circumferential resection margin in colon cancer: A retrospective study in a Chinese high-volume cancer center

Positive circumferential resection margin (CRM) was associated with a higher recurrence rate and worse survival in rectal cancer. Predictors of CRM in rectal cancer have widely been investigated. Our study aims to determine the incidence, predictors and prognostic implications of positive CRM following colon cancer (CC) surgery in a Chinese high-volume cancer center. The clinicopathological features and oncological outcomes of CC patients undergoing surgery between January 2008 and December 2018 were identified from Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center database. Positive CRM was defined as resection margin ≤1 mm. A total of 5268 stage I-IV CC patients were identified in our study, 108 (2.05%) of whom had positive CRM. Multivariate logistic analysis found that advanced N stage, distant metastases and poorly differentiated tumor had increased risk of positive CRM. After propensity score matching, the 5-year overall survival rates of the patients with positive and negative CRM were 33.2% and 39.8% (P=0.005), respectively. Multivariable COX regression model showed that positive CRM was an independent prognostic factor for OS in CC patients. The overall rate of positive CRM in our center is lower than that in western population. Several adverse pathological parameters deserve more attention to identify CC patients at a high risk of positive CRM. Adoption of appropriate surgical techniques and multidisciplinary treatment planning are expected to improve oncological outcomes for high selected CC patients with “high-risk” CRM involvement.

Long-term outcomes of laparoscopic Extralevator Abdominoperineal excision with modified position change for low rectal Cancer treatment

Background

Extralevator abdominoperineal excision (ELAPE) has been recommended for treating low rectal cancer due to its potential advantages in improving surgical safety and oncologic outcomes as compared to conventional abdominoperineal excision (APE). In ELAPE, however, whether the benefits of intraoperative position change to a prone jackknife position outweighs the associated risks remains controversial. This study is to introduce a modified position change in laparoscopic ELAPE and evaluate its feasibility, safety and the long-term therapeutic outcomes.

Methods

Medical records of 56 consecutive patients with low rectal cancer underwent laparoscopic ELAPE from November 2013 to September 2016 were retrospectively studied. In the operation, a perineal dissection in prone jackknife position was firstly performed and the laparoscopic procedure was then conducted in supine position. Patient characteristics, intraoperative and postoperative outcomes, pathologic and 5-year oncologic outcomes were analyzed.

Results

The mean operation time was 213.5 ± 29.4 min and the mean intraoperative blood loss was 152.7 ± 125.2 ml. All the tumors were totally resected, without intraoperative perforation, conversion to open surgery, postoperative 30-day death, and perioperative complications. All the patients achieved pelvic peritoneum reconstruction without the usage of biological mesh. During the follow-up period, perineal hernia was observed in 1 patient, impaired sexual function in 1 patient, and parastomal hernias in 3 patients. The local recurrence rate was 1.9% and distant metastasis was noted in 12 patients. The 5-year overall survival rate was 76.4% and the 5-year disease-free survival rate was 70.9%.

Conclusions

Laparoscopic ELAPE with modified position change is a simplified, safe and feasible procedure with favorable outcomes. The pelvic peritoneum can be directly closed by the laparoscopic approach without the application of biological mesh.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12885-022-10019-2.

The impact of subdivisions of microscopically positive (R1) margins on patterns of relapse in stage III colorectal cancer - A retrospective cohort study

AIM

Microscopically positive (R1) margins are associated with poorer outcomes in patients with colorectal cancer. However, the impact of subdivisions of R1 margins, be they to the primary tumour (R1 tumour) or to lymph node metastases (R1LNM), on patterns of relapse is unknown.

METHODS

Patients treated for stage III colorectal cancer from 01 January 2016 to 31 December 2019 in four specialist centres were identified from the Danish national cancer registry. Patients were stratified into three groups according to margin status (R0 vs. R1 tumour vs. R1LNM). The primary outcomes were local recurrence-free survival (LRFS), distant metastases-free survival (DMFS) and disease-specific survival (DSS).

RESULTS

A total of 1,164 patients were included, with R1 margins found in 237 (20.4%). Irrespective of tumour location, R1 tumour and R1LNM margins were independent prognostic factors for systemic relapse (R1 tumour HR 1.84, CI: 1.17-2.88, p = 0.008; R1LNM HR 1.59, CI: 1.12-2.27, p = 0.009) and disease-related death (R1 tumour HR 2.08, CI: 1.12-3.85, p = 0.020; R1LNM HR 1.84, CI: 1.12-3.02, p = 0.016). Whereas R1 tumour margins were associated with poorer 3-year LRFS in both colon and rectum cancer, R1LNM margins only reduced LRFS in patients with rectal cancer. Patterns of relapse differed between R1 subdivisions, with R1 tumour margins more likely to affect multiple anatomical sites, with a predilection for extra-hepatic/pulmonary metastases.

CONCLUSION

Subdivisions of R1 margins have a distinct impact on the oncological outcomes and patterns of disease relapse in patients with stage III colorectal cancer.

Impact of total neoadjuvant therapy consisting of consolidation chemotherapy on locally advanced rectal cancer survival

PURPOSE

The objective was to compare disease-free survival (DFS) and distant metastasis in patients with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NCRT) and total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT) for locally advanced rectal cancer.

METHODS

Patients with cT3-4N0M0 or cTxN1-2M0 rectal cancer were included in this retrospective study. Patients who received NCRT (radiotherapy with concurrent capecitabine) or TNT (radiotherapy with two concurrent cycles of capecitabine and oxaliplatin (CAPOX) followed by another two cycles of CAPOX) during January 2011 and November 2016 at Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital Medical University were included. All patients had received radical surgery. Adverse events, pathological response and survival outcomes in the two groups were compared.

RESULTS

One hundred eighty-two patients were enrolled, 120 in the TNT and 62 in the NCRT groups. No significant between-group differences in neoadjuvant therapy-associated adverse events or surgical complications were found. TNT achieved a higher pathological complete response (pCR) rate (25.8%) compared with NCRT (12.9%, P = 0.044). Patients in the TNT group had a higher 3-year DFS rate (82.8% versus 75.7%, P = 0.041) and lower distant metastasis rate (19.2% versus 33.1%, P = 0.049) than those in the NCRT group. Multivariate analysis showed that NCRT was an independent risk factor for DFS (95%CI 2.023-13.415, P = 0.001) and distant metastasis (95% CI 2.149-20.082, P = 0.001).

CONCLUSION

With similar adverse events and a higher pCR rate when compared with NCRT, TNT might be considered as a safe and effective therapeutic strategy to improve prognosis in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer.

The significance of subdivisions of microscopically positive (R1) margins in colorectal cancer: A retrospective study of a national cancer registry

AIM

Microscopically positive (R1) margins are associated with poorer outcomes in patients with colorectal cancer. However, little is known of the differential impact of subdivisions of R1 margins, be they to the primary tumour (R1tumour) or to lymph node metastases/tumour deposits (R1LNM).

METHODS

Patients treated for Stage III colorectal cancer from 1 January 2016 to 31 December 2019 were identified from the Danish national cancer registry. Patients were stratified into three groups according to margin status (R0 vs. R1tumour vs. R1LNM). The primary outcome was overall survival.

RESULTS

In all, 4186 patients were included, comprising 3012 patients with colon cancer and 1174 patients with rectal cancer. The R1 resection rates were 16.5% and 18.2% in patients with colon and rectum cancer, respectively. In colon cancers, 3-year overall survival was reduced in patients with R1LNM (65.7%, 95% CI 62.8-68.6) or R1tumour margins (51.8%, 95% CI 47.3-56.3) compared with R0 resections (80.8%, 95% CI 79.9-81.6, P < 0.001). A similar impact on survival was seen in rectal cancers (R0, 84.2%, 95% CI 82.9-85.5; R1LNM, 72.2%, 95% CI 67.8-76.6; R1tumour, 56.6%, 95% CI 50.0-63.2, P < 0.001). Margin status was independently prognostic of survival in both colon (R1tumour, hazard ratio 2.08, 95% CI 1.50-2.89, P < 0.001; R1LNM, hazard ratio 1.48, 95% CI 1.11-1.97, P = 0.008) and rectal cancers (R1tumour, hazard ratio 2.35, 95% CI 1.42-3.90, P < 0.001; R1LNM, hazard ratio 1.54, 95% CI 0.95-2.48, P = 0.077).

CONCLUSION

R1 subdivisions have distinct impacts on survival in Stage III colorectal cancer. Further focused research in these patient subgroups is warranted.

Type of recurrence is associated with disease-free survival after salvage surgery for locally recurrent rectal cancer

PURPOSE

To compare the characteristics and outcomes of rectal cancer patients with local recurrence at a perianastomotic site (PA), a surgical field (SF) site, or in lateral lymph nodes (LLN).

METHODS

A total of 114 consecutive patients who underwent surgery for recurrent, non-metastatic rectal cancer at a single comprehensive cancer center between 1997 and 2012 were grouped on the basis of radiographic assessment of type of recurrence: PA, 76 (67%) patients; SF, 25 (22%) patients; LLN, 13 (11%) patients. Demographic, clinical, and pathological features were compared between the three groups, as were disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

Recurrence type was associated with positive circumferential margin in the primary resection (PA, 4 [6%]; SF, 4 [19%]; LLN, 3 [25%]; P = 0.027), prior neoadjuvant therapy for the primary tumor (PA, 57 [75%]; SF, 18 [72%]; LLN, 4 [31%]; P = 0.007), and location of the primary tumor in the upper rectum (PA, 33 [45%]; SF, 5 [23%]; LLN, 1 [8%]; P < 0.001). Patients with PA had longer median DFS (PA, 5.1 years; SF, 1.5 years; LLN, 1.2 years; P = 0.036). There was a non-significant trend toward longer OS and higher rates of R0 resection for PA.

CONCLUSION

Type of recurrence after salvage surgery for locally recurrent rectal cancer is associated with longer DFS in patients with PA recurrence.

Preoperative Short-Course Radiotherapy and Surgery versus Surgery Alone for Patients with Rectal Cancer: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis at 18-Year Follow-Up

A significant problem for long-term rectal cancer survivors may be the late toxicity of radiotherapy. It creates the possible risk of developing second primary malignancy and a theoretical decrease in overall survival. This study aimed to assess the influence of short-course preoperative radiotherapy in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer on overall survival, local recurrence rate, and second malignancy at 18-year follow-up. The rectal cancer trial was conducted in a single tertiary center between February 1992 and June 2006. A total of 389 patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (cT2-cT4, cN0/+, cM0) were included in the study. Preoperative radiotherapy was conducted in 148 patients and 241 patients underwent surgery alone. The propensity-matched group consisted of 105 patients operated on after radiotherapy and 105 controls. The number of local recurrences was 7 (6.7%) in the preoperative radiotherapy group and 22 (21%) in the surgery alone group (p = 0.016). The 18-year survival analysis showed no survival benefit in the preoperative radiotherapy group (38% versus 48%, p = 0.107) but improved recurrence-free survival (81% versus 58%, p = 0.001). The preoperative short-course radiotherapy significantly decreases the risk of local recurrence in locally advanced rectal cancer and may improve recurrence-free survival without an increased risk of second primary malignancy.

Prognostic importance of circumferential resection margin in the era of evolving surgical and multidisciplinary treatment of rectal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Circumferential resection margin is considered an important prognostic parameter after rectal cancer surgery, but its impact might have changed because of improved surgical quality and tailored multimodality treatment. The aim of this systematic review was to determine the prognostic importance of circumferential resection margin involvement based on the most recent literature.

METHODS

A systematic literature search of MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Library was performed for studies published between January 2006 and May 2019. Studies were included if 3- or 5-year oncological outcomes were reported depending on circumferential resection margin status. Outcome parameters were local recurrence, overall survival, disease-free survival, and distant metastasis rate. The Newcastle Ottawa Scale and Jadad score were used for quality assessment of the studies. Meta-analysis was performed using a random effects model and reported as a pooled odds ratio or hazard ratio with 95% confidence interval.

RESULTS

Seventy-five studies were included, comprising a total of 85,048 rectal cancer patients. Significant associations between circumferential resection margin involvement and all long-term outcome parameters were uniformly found, with varying odds ratios and hazard ratios depending on circumferential resection margin definition (<1 mm, ≤1 mm, otherwise), neoadjuvant treatment, study period, and geographical origin of the studies.

CONCLUSION

Circumferential resection margin involvement has remained an independent, poor prognostic factor for local recurrence and survival in most recent literature, indicating that circumferential resection margin status can still be used as a short-term surrogate endpoint.

[Evidence in minimally invasive oncological surgery of the colon and rectum]

An essential component of the treatment of colorectal cancer is a resection of the tumor-bearing segment of the bowels. After the development of minimally invasive procedures the feasibility and safety in oncological, colorectal surgery was questioned. The broad study situation for colon cancer over the last years showed predominantly consistent benefits during the perioperative phase and non-inferiority concerning long-term oncological outcomes. The implementation of laparoscopic rectal resection was more hesitant due to the complexity of the procedure and insufficient study data; however, overall the short-term benefits seem to be maintained and laparoscopic rectal resection is thought to be noninferior to open resection in the long run even though findings on the quality of the resected specimen are heterogeneous. Accordingly, most guidelines now include a recommendation of laparoscopic resection for colorectal cancer. The limitation with respect to an achievable oncological equivalency of resection takes account of the complexity and the requirements of the intervention only in the setting of rational selection of patients and sufficient experience of the surgeon.

Comparison of Survival between Single-Access and Conventional Laparoscopic Surgery in Rectal Cancer

Introduction

Innovative laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer can be classified into 2 types: firstly, new instruments such as robotic surgery and secondly, new technique such as single-access laparoscopic surgery (SALS) and transanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME). Most reports of SALS for rectal cancer have shown pathologic outcomes comparable to those of conventional laparoscopic surgery (CLS); however, SALS is considered to be superior to CLS in terms of lower levels of discomfort and faster recovery rates. This study aimed to compare the survival outcomes of the two approaches.

Methods

From 2011 to 2014, 84 cases of adenocarcinoma of the rectum and anal canal were enrolled. The operations were anterior, low anterior, intersphincteric, and abdominoperineal resections. Data collected included postoperative outcomes. The oncological outcomes recorded included 3-year and 5-year survival, local recurrence, and metastasis.

Results

SALS was performed on 41 patients, and CLS was utilized in 43 cases. The demographic data of the two groups were similar. Intraoperative volumes of blood loss and conversion rates were similar, but operative time was longer in the SALS group. There were no significant differences in postoperative complications or pathological outcomes. The oncologic results were similar in terms of 3-year survival (100% and 97.7%; p = 1.00), 5-year survival (78.0% and 86.0%; p = 0.401), local recurrence rates (19.5% vs 11.6%, p = 0.376), and metastasis rates (19.5% vs 11.6%; p = 0.376) for SALS and CLS, respectively.

Conclusion

SALS and CLS for rectal and anal cancer had comparable pathological and survival results, but SALS showed some superior benefits in the early postoperative period.

Prone Versus Supine Position in Abdominoperineal Resection: Outcomes in the Laparoscopic Era

Background: It is unclear whether the supine or prone approach for abdominoperineal resection (APR) influences outcomes. Methods: In a retrospective study of patients with rectal cancer who underwent curative laparoscopic APR from 2005 to 2018, we compared perioperative data, postoperative outcomes, oncological outcomes, and survival between the two approaches. Results: We recruited 123 patients (58 for the supine group and 65 for the prone group), with a median age of 72 (41-93) years. Mean follow-up was 67.4-45.7 months (28-169) in the supine group and 47.8-30.9 months (13-158) in the prone group (P = .026). Duration of surgery was longer in the prone group at 237 ± 52.3 minutes versus 210 ± 56.6 minutes in the supine group (P = .007). The incidence of tumor perforation during surgery was 9% in the supine group versus 3% in the prone group (P = .208). The incidence of perineal wound infection did not differ significantly between groups (supine 22% versus prone 20%, P = .93). The mesorectum was incomplete in 25% cases in the supine group and 14% cases in the prone group (P = .175). Circumferential resection margin positivity was 21% in the supine group and 14% in the prone group (P = .374). Local and distant recurrence was higher in patients with adenocarcinoma in the supine group at 10% and 31% versus 4% and 17% in the prone group (P = .177). Overall survival was higher in the prone group: 4% of patients died due to disease progression compared with 24% in the supine group (P = .034). Conclusions: Our results suggest that morbidity is similar with both laparoscopic techniques, but long-term outcomes seem better with the prone approach.

Oncological strategy following R1 sphincter-saving resection in low rectal cancer after chemoradiotherapy

AIM

Sphincter-saving resection (SSR) for low rectal cancer remains challenging due to the high risk of positive resection margin (R1). Long-term outcomes and the dedicated oncological strategy are not well established in this situation. The aim of this study was to define the more appropriate strategy according to the patterns of recurrence.

METHODS

Between 1994 and 2014, patients treated by SSR for low rectal cancer with preoperative chemoradiotherapy were included. Three types of recurrences were defined: local (LR), distant (DR) and mixed (MR). Recurrences and survival after R0 and R1 resection were analysed by Kaplan-Meier and compared with the log-rang test.

RESULTS

Among 394 patients receiving SSR, 42 (10.6%) had R1 resection. Independent factors of R1 resection were EMVI (OR2.24,95%IC1.10-4.53,p = 0.025) and no tumor downstaging (OR8.41,95%IC2.50-8.32,p = 0.001). Both 5-year disease free and overall survival, and 5-year distant and local recurrence, were significantly worse after R1 resection. The overall recurrence after R1 resection was 57% (24/42), 7% had LR, 36% DR and 14% MR. Time to DR was shorter than time to LR (11.1 vs. 34.3) months. In all cases of MR, DR occurred before LR (12.1 vs. 34.3) months, meaning that after R1 resection, the first concern was DR.

CONCLUSION

R1 resection after SSR for low rectal cancer reflects a more aggressive and systemic disease. Prognosis depends on DR in about 90% of cases, suggesting that pelvic control should not be the priority in the oncological strategy after R1. Adjuvant systemic chemotherapy ought to be preferred to salvage abdominoperineal resection.

Management of the positive pathologic circumferential resection margin in rectal cancer: A national cancer database (NCDB) study

BACKGROUND

The circumferential resection margin (CRM) is a primary predictor of local recurrence and survival in rectal cancer, and an important consideration in guiding treatment. CRM is usually predicted preoperatively, so optimal management of an unexpected pathologic positive CRM involvement is debatable. We aimed to investigate the postoperative management of T3N0 rectal cancers with a positive pathologic CRM, and the impact of each strategy on survival.

METHODS

The NCDB was reviewed for pathological T3N0 rectal cancer cases from 2010 to 2015, that received neoadjuvant chemotherapy, had surgical resection with pathological clear margins, but a positive pathologic CRM(disease≤2 mm from radial margin). The main outcomes were the incidence, treatment modalities used, and impact of each modality on survival. Univariate analysis evaluated the demographic and provider characteristics across treatment groups. Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analysis assessed survival and factors associated with overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

Of 1607 cases with a positive CRM, 65% (1045) received no adjuvant treatment and 35% (n = 562) received adjuvant chemotherapy (AC). After matching, the 1-, 3-, and 5-year OS rates were 98.5%, 88.6% and 76.6% for AC and 96.9%, 84.6% and 68.4% for with no treatment (p = .027). Factors independently associated with improved OS were treatment at an academic/research facility (p = .009), minimally invasive approach (p = .005), well and moderately differentiated tumor (p < .001), absence of perineural invasion (p = .015) and AC administration (p = .047).

CONCLUSION

In T3N0 rectal cancers resected with local clear margins but a positive pathologic CRM, AC improved OS. However, only a third received this option. Further study is needed to investigate the disparities in AC use in these patients with unexpected pathologic results.

Management of the adenocarcinoma of the upper rectum: a reappraisal

The present review attempts to assess whether upper rectal cancer (URC) should be treated either as colon cancer or as rectal one, namely to be managed with upfront surgery without neo-adjuvant treatment and partial mesorectal excision (PME), or with neo-adjuvant short course radiotherapy (SCRT) or chemoradiotherapy (CRT) as indicated, followed by surgery with total mesorectal excision. Reports from current evidence including studies, reviews and various guidelines are conflicting. Main reasons for inability to reach safe conclusions are (i) the various anatomical definitions of the rectum and its upper part, (ii) the inadequate preoperative local staging,(iii) the heterogeneity of selection criteria for the neo-adjuvant treatment,(iv) the different neo-adjuvant treatment regimens, and(v) the variety in the extent of surgical resection, among the studies. Although not adequately supported, locally advanced URC can be treated with neo-adjuvant CRT provided the lesion is within the radiation field of safety, and a PME if the lower border of the tumour is located above the anterior peritoneal reflection. There is evidence that adjuvant chemotherapy is of benefit in high-risk stage II and stage III lesions.

The quality of lymph node harvests in extralevator abdominoperineal excisions

Background

Lymph node (LN) harvest in colorectal cancer resections is a well-recognised prognostic factor for disease staging and determining survival, particularly for node-negative (N0) diseases. Extralevator abdominoperineal excisions (ELAPE) aim to prevent “waisting” that occurs during conventional abdominoperineal resections (APR) for low rectal cancers, and reducing circumferential resection margin (CRM) infiltration rate. Our study investigates whether ELAPE may also improve the quality of LN harvests, addressing gaps in the literature.

Methods

This retrospective observational study reviewed 2 sets of 30 consecutive APRs before and after the adoption of ELAPE in our unit. The primary outcomes are the total LN counts and rates of meeting the standard of 12-minimum, particularly for those with node-negative disease. The secondary outcomes are the CRM involvement rates. Baseline characteristics including age, sex, laparoscopic or open surgery and the use of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy were accounted for in our analyses.

Results

Median LN counts were slightly higher in the ELAPE group (16.5 vs. 15). Specimens failing the minimum 12-LN requirements were almost significantly fewer in the ELAPE group (OR 0.456, P = 0.085). Among node-negative rectal cancers, significantly fewer resections failed the 12-LN standard in the ELAPE group than APR group (OR 0.211, P = 0.044). ELAPE led to a near-significant decrease in CRM involvement (OR 0.365, P = 0.088). These improvements were persistently observed after taking into account baselines and potential confounders in regression analyses.

Conclusion

ELAPE provides higher quality of LN harvests that meet the 12-minimal requirements than conventional APR, particularly in node-negative rectal cancers. The superiority is independent of potential confounding factors, and may implicate better clinical outcomes.

A Comprehensive Review of Randomized Clinical Trials Shaping the Landscape of Rectal Cancer Therapy

Colorectal carcinoma is the second leading cause of cancer-related deaths in the United States, with rectal cancer accounting for approximately one third of newly diagnosed cases. Surgery remains the cornerstone of curative therapy, with total mesorectal excision being the standard of care. Although minimally invasive procedures might be appropriate for a subset of patients with early-stage, superficial tumors, the standard of care for medically operable patients with nonmetastatic rectal cancer includes a comprehensive multimodality approach of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy, surgery with total mesorectal excision, and systemic chemotherapy. However, the morbidity and mortality related to both local and distant organ relapse have remained challenging. In the present review, we have discussed the trial-level evidence that has shaped the current clinical practice patterns in the treatment of curable, nonmetastatic rectal cancer. In addition, we have discussed the anticipated results of ongoing clinical trials and outlined pragmatic opportunities for future investigation to optimize the current status quo and, hopefully, provide prospective validation of novel approaches in the treatment of rectal cancer.

Risk of local recurrence of rectal cancer and circumferential resection margin: population-based cohort study

Background

A circumferential resection margin (CRM) of 1·0 mm or less after rectal cancer surgery is thought to increase the risk of local recurrence (LR). This retrospective population-based study examined how CRM distance affects the LR risk.

Methods

Data from the Swedish Colorectal Cancer Registry were used in a retrospective analysis of rectal cancers resected between 2005 and 2013. The primary endpoint was LR.

Results

A total of 12 146 patients were identified, of whom 8392 were included in the analysis; 739 patients had a CRM of 1·0 mm or less and 7653 had a CRM larger than 1·0 mm. The mean follow-up time was 51 months. There were 66 LRs (8·9 per cent) in the group with a CRM of 1·0 mm or less, and 256 (3·3 per cent) among patients with a CRM larger than 1·0 mm. The LR rate was 17·0 per cent (27 of 159), 6·7 per cent (39 of 580), 1·9 per cent (2 of 103) and 3·4 per cent (254 of 7550) when the CRM was 0, 0·1–1·0, 1·1–1·9 and at least 2·0 mm respectively. The risk of LR among patients with a CRM of 0 mm was higher than that in all other subgroups with a larger CRM (P &lt; 0·050). There was no difference in LR between the subgroups with CRM 1·1–1·9 mm and at least 2·0 mm. LR was diagnosed earlier when the CRM was 1·0 mm or less.

Conclusion

LR risk is related to exact CRM, with the highest risk in patients with a CRM of 0 mm. Close monitoring of patients with no measurable clear margin may allow early detection of LR.

Low rate of local recurrence detection by rectoscopy in follow-up of rectal cancer

AIM

The main aim of this study was to examine the effectiveness of rectoscopy for detecting local recurrence of rectal cancer in patients following low anterior resection.

METHOD

This was a retrospective study of 201 patients, who underwent low anterior resection for rectal or rectosigmoid cancer between 2007 and 2009 and who were followed up with rigid rectoscopy and imaging. A total of 91 patients were excluded from the analysis for various reasons, leaving 110 patients eligible for analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 613 rectoscopies were performed, and 48 biopsies taken. Six local recurrences were detected in the 110 patients, three of which were first detected by rectoscopy and three by CT. Two of the local recurrences were detected outside the follow-up programme because of symptoms: one by rectoscopy and one by CT. Three of 613 (0.5%) rectoscopies led to detection of local recurrence. The sensitivity and specificity of rectoscopy to detect local recurrence was 0.50 and 0.93, respectively. Nineteen distant metastases were detected, and two patients had both local recurrence and distant metastasis. All local recurrences and distant metastases were detected within 48 months of surgery.

CONCLUSION

Rigid rectoscopy is poor at detecting local recurrence. Only 3 out of 613 rectoscopies (0.5%) detected local recurrence. Due to extramural growth of some recurrences, the sensitivity is also very low. Based on our results, routine rectoscopy in the surveillance of asymptomatic patients cannot be recommended.

Clinicopathologic Analysis of Lateral Margin Measured by Whole-mount Section in T3 Rectal Cancer

PURPOSE

Total mesorectal excision is a standard technique for rectal cancer. The whole-mount section can encompass the entire specimen, so it is a more appropriate for measuring circumferential margin than conventional section. We analyzed the clinical characteristics and prognosis based on lateral margins measured by whole-mount sections.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Medical records of patients who were operated on for T3 rectal cancer from 2005 to 2015 were reviewed retrospectively. A total of 154 patients were included. The slides of the whole-mount sections were re-reviewed by a single pathologist.

RESULTS

We divided the groups according to the length of the lateral margin (LM: 1mm, 1.5mm and 2mm). There was significantly frequent lymphovascular invasion and N state was higher when LM was short in all groups. There were more micrometastasis in group LM.

Transanal total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer has been suspended in Norway

Background

Transanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME) for rectal cancer has emerged as an alternative to the traditional abdominal approach. However, concerns have been raised about local recurrence. The aim of this study was to evaluate local recurrence after TaTME. Secondary aims included postoperative mortality, anastomotic leak and stoma rates.

Methods

Data on all patients who underwent TaTME were recorded and compared with those from national cohorts in the Norwegian Colorectal Cancer Registry (NCCR) and the Norwegian Registry for Gastrointestinal Surgery (NoRGast). Kaplan–Meier estimates were used to compare local recurrence.

Results

In Norway, 157 patients underwent TaTME for rectal cancer between October 2014 and October 2018. Three of seven hospitals abandoned TaTME after a total of five procedures. The local recurrence rate was 12 of 157 (7·6 per cent); eight local recurrences were multifocal or extensive. The estimated local recurrence rate at 2·4 years was 11·6 (95 per cent c.i. 6·6 to 19·9) per cent after TaTME compared with 2·4 (1·4 to 4·3) per cent in the NCCR (P &lt; 0·001). The adjusted hazard ratio was 6·71 (95 per cent c.i. 2·94 to 15·32). Anastomotic leaks resulting in reoperation occurred in 8·4 per cent of patients in the TaTME cohort compared with 4·5 per cent in NoRGast (P = 0·047). Fifty-six patients (35·7 per cent) had a stoma at latest follow-up; 39 (24·8 per cent) were permanent.

Conclusion

Anastomotic leak rates after TaTME were higher than national rates; local recurrence rates and growth patterns were unfavourable.

Detailed and applied anatomy for improved rectal cancer treatment

Rectal anatomy is one of the most challenging concepts of visceral anatomy, even though currently there are more than 23,000 papers indexed in PubMed regarding this topic. Nonetheless, even though there is a plethora of information meant to assist clinicians to achieve a better practice, there is no universal understanding of its complexity. This in turn increases the morbidity rates due to iatrogenic causes, as mistakes that could be avoided are repeated. For this reason, this review attempts to gather current knowledge regarding the detailed anatomy of the rectum and to organize and present it in a manner that focuses on its clinical implications, not only for the colorectal surgeon, but most importantly for all colorectal cancer-related specialties.

Oncologic Outcomes of Postoperative Chemoradiotherapy Versus Chemotherapy Alone in Stage II and III Upper Rectal Cancer

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to assess oncological outcomes of postoperative radiotherapy plus chemotherapy (CRT) versus chemotherapy alone (CTx) in stage II or III upper rectal cancer patients who underwent curative surgery.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 263 consecutive patients with pathologic stage II or III upper rectal cancer who underwent primary curative resection with postoperative CRT or CTx from January 2008 to December 2014 at Chonnam National University Hwasun Hospital. Multivariate and propensity score matching analyses were used to reduce selection bias.

RESULTS

Median follow-up was 48.1 months for the entire cohort and 53.5 months for the matched cohort. In subgroup analysis of the propensity score matched cohort, the 3-year local recurrence-free survival was 94.1% (95% confidence interval [CI], 87.8%-100%) in the CRT group and 90.1% (95% CI, 82.8%-97.9%) in the CTx group (P = 0.370). No significant difference in disease-free survival was observed according to treatment type. On multivariate analysis, circumferential resection margin involvement (hazard ratio [HR], 2.386; 95% CI, 1.190-7.599; P = 0.032), N stage (HR, 6.262; 95% CI, 1.843-21.278, P = 0.003), and T stage (HR, 5.896, 95% CI, 1.298-6.780, P = 0.021) were identified as independent risk factors for local recurrence of tumors of the upper rectum.

CONCLUSION

Omission of radiotherapy in an adjuvant treatment setting may not jeopardize oncologic outcomes in stages II and III upper rectal cancer.

State of the Art - Rectal Cancer Surgery

Background

In an aging society, the incidence and relevance of rectal cancer as one of the most frequent gastrointestinal cancers gains in importance. Excellent surgery and up-to-date multimodal treatments are essential for adequate oncological results and good quality of life.

Summary

In this review, we describe modern developments in rectal cancer surgery and its embedment in modern multimodal therapy concepts.

Key Message

Distinguished interdisciplinary cooperation combined with an outstanding surgical expertise is the basic requirement for an optimal treatment of rectal cancer. Thus, high standards of oncological outcome and patient's quality of life can be achieved.

Do Acellular Mucin Pools in Resection Margins for Rectal Cancer Influence Outcomes?

Positive resection margins predict poor prognosis in rectal cancer (RC). Literature on the impact of acellular mucin (ACM) in circumferential resection margin (CRM) or distal resection margin (DRM) of proctectomy specimens on RC recurrence and outcomes is lacking. The retrospective study was conducted to determine the oncological outcomes of the RC patients with ACM in or within 1 mm of margins of the rectal resection specimens. Histopathology reports of RC resection specimens dated from June 2013 till May 2016 were reviewed to identify cases with ACM in CRM (n = 10) and DRM (n = 2). Relevant details of these patients were gathered from the electronic medical record. Pattern of recurrence was studied. In cases with only ACM in CRM (n = 10), disease (primary tumor or nodes) was radiologically reaching the mesorectal fascia except two, who had extra mesorectal nodes. Median distance of tumor from anal verge was 2 cm. All patient received neoadjuvant therapy: four patients received chemoradiotherapy (NACTRT), one received short-course radiotherapy, and five received NACTRT followed by neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Abdominoperineal resection, intersphincteric resection and total pelvic exenteration were done for six, three, and one patient, respectively. In two additional cases of anterior resection with ACM in DRM, one underwent upfront resection while the other received NACTRT. Over a mean follow-up period of 43 months, four patients developed recurrences. Two of them had local recurrence and only one had isolated local recurrence. ACM in resection margins of RC resection specimens does not seem to increase likelihood of local recurrence.

What are the most important prognostic factors in patients with residual rectal cancer after preoperative chemoradiotherapy?

Background

We aimed to establish robust histoprognostic predictors on residual rectal cancer after preoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT).

Methods

Analyzing known histoprognostic factors in 146 patients with residual disease allows associations with patient outcome to be evaluated.

Results

The median follow-up time was 77.8 months, during which 59 patients (40.4%) experienced recurrence and 41 (28.1%) died of rectal cancer. On univariate analysis, residual tumor size, ypT category, ypN category, ypTNM stage, downstage, tumor regression grade, lymphatic invasion, perineural invasion, venous invasion, and circumferential resection margin (CRM) were significantly associated with recurrence free survival (RFS) or/and cancer-specific survival (CSS) (all p<0.005). On multivariate analysis, higher ypTNM stage and CRM positivity were identified as independent prognostic factors for RFS (ypTNM stage, p=0.024; CRM positivity, p<0.001) and CSS (p=0.022, p=0.017, respectively). Furthermore, CRM positivity was an independent predictor of reduced RFS and CSS, irrespective of subgrouping according to downstage (non-downstage, p<0.001 and p<0.001; downstage, p=0.002 and p=0.002) or lymph node metastasis (non-metastasis, p<0.001 and p=0.001; metastasis, p<0.001 and p<0.001).

Conclusion

CRM status may be as powerful as ypTNM stage as a prognostic indicator for patient outcome in patients with residual rectal cancer after preoperative CRT.

Transanal Total Mesorectal Excision: Is There a Real Advantage? The Baltic View

Background

The novel surgical procedure transanal total mesorectal excision (taTME) has rapidly become an interest of research in order to overcome the shortcomings of laparoscopic surgery in the treatment of middle and low rectal cancer. taTME is a new natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery modality combining three rectal surgery techniques.

Methods

A retrospective clinical study was conducted in a single centre for a period of 3 years, and herein we report on our first 25 taTME procedures in patients with middle and lower third rectal adenocarcinoma.

Results

The main demographics were evaluated. The mean age of patients was 64 ± 12 years. There were predominantly males (72%) and 7 female patients (28%) with an average body mass index of 29 ± 4.8 kg/m². High blood pressure, obesity, chronic heart insufficiency, chronic atrial fibrillation, and diabetes mellitus were commonly diagnosed in all patients. A circumferential resection margin >1 mm was achieved in 16% (n = 4), >2 mm in 40% (n = 10), and >3 mm in 44% (n = 11) of operated patients. The average CRM was 1.8 ± 0.9 cm. In 24% of cases, the distance of a tumour from the mesorectal fascia (MRF) was <1 mm; meanwhile, for 76% of patients, the tumour margin was >1 mm from the MRF. Recovery to flatus was 3 ± 1 days. The average length of hospital stay was 11 ± 3 days. The overall postoperative morbidity was 8%, i.e. one (4%) complication classified as Clavien-Dindo degree I and one (4%) major (IIIb) complication. Subsequently, all patients successfully recovered and were discharged from hospital. During the follow-up period no cancer recurrence was observed.

Conclusion

Our results nicely demonstrate that taTME can be safely performed with acceptable perioperative complications in patients with middle or lower third rectal cancer. In addition, the perioperative morbidity is also acceptable. However, taTME remains a technically highly demanding operation but is feasible and safe after the appropriate experience is gained. Nevertheless, larger multi-centre prospective randomised studies are ongoing to confirm the safety and to verify oncological results when compared to laparoscopic rectal surgery.

Rectal ultrasound with fine needle aspiration: an underutilized modality for delineating and diagnosing perirectal, presacral, and pelvic lesions

Background and study aims  The merits of rectal ultrasound for rectal cancer staging are well documented. Conventional approaches to accessing perirectal and presacral lesions entail computed tomography guidance via a transgluteal approach or frank surgical exploration. We report on the safety and efficacy of performing rectal ultrasound with fine-needle aspiration (RUS-FNA) for evaluating perirectal, presacral, and pelvic abnormalities. Patients and methods  Patients who underwent RUS-FNA of perirectal, presacral, or pelvic lesions between August 2005 and September 2016 were identified using an institutional database. Subjects were all individuals treated at Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center in Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States. Patient demographics and imaging characteristics were noted. Procedural details included lesion size, location, echo appearance, and technical information. Patients were given antibiotics prior to FNA attempt and for 3 days after. Diagnostic yield, clinical utility, and complications were noted. Results  Twenty-seven patients met criteria during the specified study time period. The cohort consisted of 12 males (44.4 %) and 15 females (55.5 %). RUS-FNA was diagnostic in 24 patients (88.8 %) and obviated the need for surgery in 14 patients (51.9 %). There were four complications (14.8 %): two perirectal and two presacral abscesses. Conclusion  While the diagnostic yield of RUS-FNA is high and the potential to affect clinical decision-making is substantial, risk of complication is not negligible. RUS-FNA should only be performed if the result will substantially alter clinical management, and the decision to perform RUS-FNA should be made with close consultation between the endosonographer, surgeon, and/or medical or radiation oncologist.