Studying the Effect of the Host Genetic Background of Juvenile Polyposis Development Using Collaborative Cross and Smad4 Knock-Out Mouse Models

Juvenile polyposis syndrome (JPS) is a rare autosomal dominant disorder characterized by multiple juvenile polyps in the gastrointestinal tract, often associated with mutations in genes such as Smad4 and BMPR1A. This study explores the impact of Smad4 knock-out on the development of intestinal polyps using collaborative cross (CC) mice, a genetically diverse model. Our results reveal a significant increase in intestinal polyps in Smad4 knock-out mice across the entire population, emphasizing the broad influence of Smad4 on polyposis. Sex-specific analyses demonstrate higher polyp counts in knock-out males and females compared to their WT counterparts, with distinct correlation patterns. Line-specific effects highlight the nuanced response to Smad4 knock-out, underscoring the importance of genetic variability. Multimorbidity heat maps offer insights into complex relationships between polyp counts, locations, and sizes. Heritability analysis reveals a significant genetic basis for polyp counts and sizes, while machine learning models, including k-nearest neighbors and linear regression, identify key predictors, enhancing our understanding of juvenile polyposis genetics. Overall, this study provides new information on understanding the intricate genetic interplay in the context of Smad4 knock-out, offering valuable insights that could inform the identification of potential therapeutic targets for juvenile polyposis and related diseases.

A Different Way to Think About Syndromes of Hereditary Colorectal Cancer

BACKGROUND

Hereditary colorectal cancer is an increasingly complex field in which the commoner syndromes are being augmented by rarer genetic presentations contributing to familial polyposis and colorectal cancer. Coming to grips with the complexity is difficult because of the phenotypic and genotypic overlap between syndromes.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to describe a new way of thinking about syndromes of hereditary colorectal cancer based on their embryonic tissue of origin.

DATA SOURCES

Articles were searched through PubMed and MEDLINE.

STUDY SELECTION

The terms "hereditary colorectal cancer," "syndromes of hereditary colorectal cancer," and "hereditary polyposis" were used to direct the search.

RESULTS

Primarily endoderm-derived syndromes were different from mesoderm-derived syndromes in their genetics, molecular biology, histology, and clinical course.

LIMITATIONS

There is considerable phenotypic and genotypic overlap between syndromes, even when considering embryonic tissue of origin.

CONCLUSIONS

Thinking about hereditary syndromes of colorectal cancer from the perspective of embryonic tissue of origin provides a fresh look at phenotype and genotype that opens new areas of exploration.

UNA FORMA DIFERENTE DE PENSAR SOBRE LOS SNDROMES DEL CNCER COLORRECTAL HEREDITARIO

ANTECEDENTES:El cáncer colorrectal hereditario es un campo cada vez más complejo donde los síndromes más comunes se ven aumentados por presentaciones genéticas más raras que contribuyen a la poliposis familiar y al cáncer colorrectal. Hacer frente a esta complejidad resulta difícil debido a la superposición fenotípica y genotípica entre los síndromes.OBJETIVO:En este artículo, describimos una nueva forma de pensar sobre los síndromes de cáncer colorrectal hereditario en función del origen de su tejido embrionario.FUENTES DE DATOS:Se realizaron búsquedas de artículos en Pubmed y Medline.SELECCIÓN DE ESTUDIOS:Se utilizaron los términos "cáncer colorrectal hereditario", "síndromes de cáncer colorrectal hereditario", "poliposis hereditaria" para dirigir la búsqueda.RESULTADOS:Principalmente los síndromes derivados del endodermo fueron diferentes a los síndromes derivados del mesodermo en su genética, biología molecular, histología y curso clínico.LIMITACIONES:Existe una superposición fenotípica y genotípica considerable entre los síndromes, incluso cuando se considera el tejido de origen embrionario.CONCLUSIÓN:Pensar en los síndromes hereditarios del cáncer colorrectal desde la perspectiva del tejido embrionario de origen proporciona una nueva mirada al fenotipo y al genotipo que abre nuevas áreas de exploración. (Traducción-Dr Osvaldo Gauto ).

Genotype-phenotype correlation of BMPR1a disease causing variants in juvenile polyposis syndrome

BACKGROUND

Juvenile Polyposis Syndrome (JPS) is an autosomal dominant condition with hamartomatous polyps in the gastrointestinal tract, associated with an increased risk of gastrointestinal malignancy. Disease causing variants (DCVs) in BMPR1a or SMAD4 account for 45-60% of JPS cases, with BMPR1a DCVs accounting for 17-38% of JPS cases. Within those with either a BMPR1a or SMAD4 DCV, there is phenotypic variability in location of polyps, risk of malignancy and extra-intestinal manifestations with limited published reports of gene-phenotype association or genotype-phenotype correlation. We aimed to identify any gene-phenotype association or genotype-phenotype correlation in BMPR1a to inform surveillance recommendations, and gene-specific modification to the ACMG classification of pathogenicity of DCVs.

METHODS

A literature search was performed through EMBASE, MEDLINE and PubMed. Studies that were included explored BMPR1a DCV-related JPS or contiguous deletion of PTEN and BMPR1a. Data was also drawn from the BMPR1a specific databases on LOVD and ClinVar.

RESULTS

There were 211 DCVs in BMPR1a identified, 82 from patients with JPS in the literature, and 17 from LOVD and 112 from ClinVar classified as pathogenic or likely pathogenic. These included missense, nonsense and frameshift variants and large deletions, occurring across all functional domains of the gene. Unlike in SMAD4 carriers, gastric polyposis and malignancy were not identified in our review in BMPR1a carriers, but colonic polyposis and malignancy occurred in carriers of either BMPR1a or SMAD4 DCVs. Those with contiguous deletion of PTEN and BMPR1a can present with JPS of infancy, with a severe phenotype of GI bleeding, diarrhoea, exudative enteropathy and rectal prolapse. No specific BMPR1a genotype-phenotype correlation could be ascertained including by variant type or functional domain.

CONCLUSION

Phenotypic characteristics cannot be used to inform variant location in BMPR1a. However, the phenotypic characteristics of BMPR1a DCV carriers, being almost exclusively related to the colon and rectum, can assist in pathogenicity assessment of BMPR1a variants. Given these findings, we propose that carriers of BMPR1a DCVs should only require surveillance for colorectal polyps and malignancy, and that surveillance for gastric polyps and malignancy may be unnecessary. However variant location within BMPR1a does not support differential surveillance recommendations.

Occurrence of gastric cancer in patients with juvenile polyposis syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

The true rate of gastric cancer (GC) in juvenile polyposis syndrome (JPS) is unknown because of its rarity and ascertainment bias in published literature. To better assess this, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis.

METHODS

MEDLINE, Embase, and Scopus databases were searched for the key words juvenile polyposis syndrome, juvenile polyps, stomach cancer, GC, SMAD4, BMPR1A, hamartomatous polyposis syndrome, hamartomas, and hereditary cancers for studies reporting upper GI manifestations in JPS. The primary outcome was the reported occurrence of GC in JPS. We then compared GC occurrence based on the presence or absence of pathogenic germline variants (PGVs) and in untested patients.

RESULTS

Eleven studies including 637 patients were included. The pooled occurrence of GC was 3.5% (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.8-5.2; I² = 12.3%) at a median age of 42.5 years (range, 15-57.6). The pooled occurrence of GC in patients with SMAD4 PGV was 10.1% (95% CI, 3.2-16.8%; I² = 54.7%). GC was reported in only 1 BMPR1A PGV carrier and was not reported in patients without an identifiable PGV. In patients with prior germline testing, the risk of GC was higher in SMAD4 PGV carriers (odds ratio, 11.6; 95% CI, 4.6-29.4; I² = 18.3%) compared with patients without SMAD4 PGV. In JPS patients with unknown status of germline testing, pooled occurrence of GC was 7.5% (95% CI, 0-15.5). There was an overall moderate risk of bias in the studies.

CONCLUSIONS

GC is highest in SMAD4-associated JPS and was not reported in patients without identifiable PGVs. The value of GC surveillance in BMPR1A PGV carriers and JPS patients without an identifiable PGV is questionable. Germline testing should be performed in all JPS patients to inform GC risk discussion and utility of surveillance.

Hamartomatous polyps: Diagnosis, surveillance, and management

Hereditary polyposis syndrome can be divided into three categories: Ade-nomatous, serrated, and hamartomatous polyps. Hamartomatous polyps, malformations of normal tissue presenting in a disorganized manner, are characterized by an autosomal dominant inheritance pattern. These syndromes exhibit hamartomatous gastrointestinal polyps in conjunction to extra-intestinal manifestations, which require conscientious and diligent monitoring. Peutz-Jeghers syndrome, Cowden syndrome, and juvenile polyposis syndrome are the most common displays of hamartomatous polyposis syndrome (HPS). Diagnosis can be pursued with molecular testing and endoscopic sampling. Early identification of these autosomal dominant pathologies allows to optimize malignancy sur-veillance, which helps reduce morbidity and mortality in both the affected patient population as well as at-risk family members. Endoscopic surveillance is an important pillar of prognosis and monitoring, with many patients eventually requiring surgical intervention. In this review, we discuss the diagnosis, surveillance, and management of HPS.

Clinical Spectrum and Science Behind the Hamartomatous Polyposis Syndromes

The hamartomatous polyposis syndromes are a set of clinically distinct disorders characterized by the occurrence of hamartomatous polyps in the gastrointestinal tract. These syndromes include juvenile polyposis syndrome, Peutz-Jeghers syndrome, and PTEN hamartoma tumor syndrome. Although each of the syndromes has distinct phenotypes, the hamartomatous polyps can be challenging to differentiate histologically. Additionally, each of these syndromes is associated with increased lifetime risks of gene-specific and organ-specific cancers, including those outside of the gastrointestinal tract. Germline pathogenic variants can be identified in a subset of individuals with these syndromes, which facilitates molecular diagnosis and subsequent gene-enabled management in the setting of genetic counseling. Although the malignant potential of hamartomatous polyps remains elusive, timely recognition of these syndromes is important and enables presymptomatic cancer surveillance and management before symptom exacerbation. Presently, there are no standard agents to prevent the development of polyps and cancers in the hamartomatous polyposis syndromes.

Genetic Predisposition to Colorectal Cancer: How Many and Which Genes to Test?

Colorectal cancer is one of the most common tumors, and genetic predisposition is one of the key risk factors in the development of this malignancy. Lynch syndrome and familial adenomatous polyposis are the best-known genetic diseases associated with hereditary colorectal cancer. However, some other genetic disorders confer an increased risk of colorectal cancer, such as Li-Fraumeni syndrome (TP53 gene), MUTYH-associated polyposis (MUTYH gene), Peutz-Jeghers syndrome (STK11 gene), Cowden syndrome (PTEN gene), and juvenile polyposis syndrome (BMPR1A and SMAD4 genes). Moreover, the recent advances in molecular techniques, in particular Next-Generation Sequencing, have led to the identification of many new genes involved in the predisposition to colorectal cancers, such as RPS20, POLE, POLD1, AXIN2, NTHL1, MSH3, RNF43 and GREM1. In this review, we summarized the past and more recent findings in the field of cancer predisposition genes, with insights into the role of the encoded proteins and into the associated genetic disorders. Furthermore, we discussed the possible clinical utility of genetic testing in terms of prevention protocols and therapeutic approaches.

A New SMAD4 Splice Site Variant in a Three-Generation Italian Family with Juvenile Polyposis Syndrome

Juvenile polyposis syndrome (JPS) is an autosomal dominant disorder characterized by hyperplastic polyps in the upper and lower gastrointestinal (GI) tract with a high risk of developing GI cancers. We have described a three-generation Italian family with all the spectrum of SMAD4 phenotype. A multigene panel test was performed on the genomic DNA of the proband by next-generation sequencing, including genes related to hereditary GI tumor syndromes. Molecular analysis revealed the presence of the c.1140-2A>G substitution in the SMAD4 gene, a novel splice variant that has never been described before. Our family is remarkable in that it illustrates the variable expressivity of the SMAD4 phenotype within the same family. The possibility of phenotype variability should also be considered within family members carrying the same mutation. In JPS, a timely genetic diagnosis allows clinicians to better manage patients and to provide early surveillance and intervention for their asymptomatic mutated relatives in the early decades of life.

Adenomatous Polyposis Phenotype in BMPR1A and SMAD4 Variant Carriers

INTRODUCTION

Variants in SMAD4 or BMPR1A cause juvenile polyposis syndrome, a rare autosomal dominant condition characterized by multiple gastrointestinal hamartomatous polyps. A phenotype of attenuated adenomatous polyposis without hamartomatous polyps is rare.

METHODS

We describe a retrospective cohort of individuals with SMAD4 or BMPR1A heterozygous germline variants, having ≥10 cumulative colorectal adenomas and/or colorectal cancer without hamartomatous polyps. All individuals had multigene panel and duplication/deletion analysis to exclude other genetic syndromes.

RESULTS

The study cohort included 8 individuals. The pathogenic potential of the variants was analyzed. Variants detected included 4 missense variants, 1 nonsense variant, 1 splice site variant, and 2 genomic deletions. Features of pathogenicity were present in most variants, and cosegregation of the variant with polyposis or colorectal cancer was obtained in 7 of the 8 families. Three of 8 individuals had colorectal cancer (age less than 50 years) in addition to the polyposis phenotype. Two individuals had extraintestinal neoplasms (pancreas and ampulla of Vater).

DISCUSSION

The clinical phenotype of SMAD4 and BMPR1A variants may infrequently extend beyond the classical juvenile polyposis syndrome phenotype. Applying multigene panel analysis of hereditary cancer-related genes in individuals with unexplained polyposis can provide syndrome-based clinical surveillance for carriers and their family members.

Diagnosis and Management of Cancer Risk in the Gastrointestinal Hamartomatous Polyposis Syndromes: Recommendations From the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer

The gastrointestinal hamartomatous polyposis syndromes are rare, autosomal dominant disorders associated with an increased risk of benign and malignant intestinal and extraintestinal tumors. They include Peutz-Jeghers syndrome, juvenile polyposis syndrome, the PTEN hamartoma tumor syndrome (including Cowden's syndrome and Bannayan-Riley-Ruvalcaba syndrome), and hereditary mixed polyposis syndrome. Diagnoses are based on clinical criteria and, in some cases, confirmed by demonstrating the presence of a germline pathogenic variant. The best understood hamartomatous polyposis syndrome is Peutz-Jeghers syndrome, caused by germline pathogenic variants in the STK11 gene. The management is focused on prevention of bleeding and mechanical obstruction of the small bowel by polyps and surveillance of organs at increased risk for cancer. Juvenile polyposis syndrome is caused by a germline pathogenic variant in either the SMAD4 or BMPR1A genes, with differing clinical courses. Patients with SMAD4 pathogenic variants may have massive gastric polyposis, which can result in gastrointestinal bleeding and/or protein-losing gastropathy. Patients with SMAD4 mutations usually have the simultaneous occurrence of hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia (juvenile polyposis syndrome-hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia overlap syndrome) that can result in epistaxis, gastrointestinal bleeding from mucocutaneous telangiectasias, and arteriovenous malformations. Germline pathogenic variants in the PTEN gene cause overlapping clinical phenotypes (known as the PTEN hamartoma tumor syndromes), including Cowden's syndrome and related disorders that are associated with an increased risk of gastrointestinal and colonic polyposis, colon cancer, and other extraintestinal manifestations and cancers. Due to the relative rarity of the hamartomatous polyposis syndromes, recommendations for management are based on few studies. This U.S Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer consensus statement summarizes the clinical features, assesses the current literature, and provides guidance for diagnosis, assessment, and management of patients with the hamartomatous polyposis syndromes, with a focus on endoscopic management.

Diagnosis and management of cancer risk in the gastrointestinal hamartomatous polyposis syndromes: recommendations from the U.S. Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer

The gastrointestinal hamartomatous polyposis syndromes are rare, autosomal dominant disorders associated with an increased risk of benign and malignant intestinal and extraintestinal tumors. They include Peutz-Jeghers syndrome, juvenile polyposis syndrome, the PTEN hamartoma tumor syndrome (including Cowden's syndrome and Bannayan-Riley-Ruvalcaba syndrome), and hereditary mixed polyposis syndrome. Diagnoses are based on clinical criteria and, in some cases, confirmed by demonstrating the presence of a germline pathogenic variant. The best understood hamartomatous polyposis syndrome is Peutz-Jeghers syndrome, caused by germline pathogenic variants in the STK11 gene. The management is focused on prevention of bleeding and mechanical obstruction of the small bowel by polyps and surveillance of organs at increased risk for cancer. Juvenile polyposis syndrome is caused by a germline pathogenic variant in either the SMAD4 or BMPR1A genes, with differing clinical courses. Patients with SMAD4 pathogenic variants may have massive gastric polyposis, which can result in gastrointestinal bleeding and/or protein-losing gastropathy. Patients with SMAD4 mutations usually have the simultaneous occurrence of hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia (juvenile polyposis syndrome-hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia overlap syndrome) that can result in epistaxis, gastrointestinal bleeding from mucocutaneous telangiectasias, and arteriovenous malformations. Germline pathogenic variants in the PTEN gene cause overlapping clinical phenotypes (known as the PTEN hamartoma tumor syndromes), including Cowden's syndrome and related disorders that are associated with an increased risk of gastrointestinal and colonic polyposis, colon cancer, and other extraintestinal manifestations and cancers. Due to the relative rarity of the hamartomatous polyposis syndromes, recommendations for management are based on few studies. This U.S. Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer consensus statement summarizes the clinical features, assesses the current literature, and provides guidance for diagnosis, assessment, and management of patients with the hamartomatous polyposis syndromes, with a focus on endoscopic management.

Diagnosis and Management of Cancer Risk in the Gastrointestinal Hamartomatous Polyposis Syndromes: Recommendations From the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer

The gastrointestinal hamartomatous polyposis syndromes are rare, autosomal dominant disorders associated with an increased risk of benign and malignant intestinal and extraintestinal tumors. They include Peutz-Jeghers syndrome, juvenile polyposis syndrome, the PTEN hamartoma tumor syndrome (including Cowden's syndrome and Bannayan-Riley-Ruvalcaba syndrome), and hereditary mixed polyposis syndrome. Diagnoses are based on clinical criteria and, in some cases, confirmed by demonstrating the presence of a germline pathogenic variant. The best understood hamartomatous polyposis syndrome is Peutz-Jeghers syndrome, caused by germline pathogenic variants in the STK11 gene. The management is focused on prevention of bleeding and mechanical obstruction of the small bowel by polyps and surveillance of organs at increased risk for cancer. Juvenile polyposis syndrome is caused by a germline pathogenic variant in either the SMAD4 or BMPR1A genes, with differing clinical courses. Patients with SMAD4 pathogenic variants may have massive gastric polyposis, which can result in gastrointestinal bleeding and/or protein-losing gastropathy. Patients with SMAD4 mutations usually have the simultaneous occurrence of hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia (juvenile polyposis syndrome-hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia overlap syndrome) that can result in epistaxis, gastrointestinal bleeding from mucocutaneous telangiectasias, and arteriovenous malformations. Germline pathogenic variants in the PTEN gene cause overlapping clinical phenotypes (known as the PTEN hamartoma tumor syndromes), including Cowden's syndrome and related disorders that are associated with an increased risk of gastrointestinal and colonic polyposis, colon cancer, and other extraintestinal manifestations and cancers. Due to the relative rarity of the hamartomatous polyposis syndromes, recommendations for management are based on few studies. This US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer consensus statement summarizes the clinical features, assesses the current literature, and provides guidance for diagnosis, assessment, and management of patients with the hamartomatous polyposis syndromes, with a focus on endoscopic management.

Nonmalignant Features Associated with Inherited Colorectal Cancer Syndromes-Clues for Diagnosis

Simple Summary

Familiarity with nonmalignant features and comorbidities of cancer predisposition syndromes may raise awareness and assist clinicians in the diagnosis and interpretation of molecular test results. Genetic predisposition to colorectal cancer (CRC) should be suspected mainly in young patients, in patients with significant family histories, multiple polyps, mismatch repair-deficient tumors, and in association with malignant or nonmalignant comorbidities. The aim of this review is to describe the main nonmalignant comorbidities associated with selected CRC predisposition syndromes that may serve as valuable diagnostic clues for clinicians and genetic professionals.

Abstract

Genetic diagnosis of affected individuals and predictive testing of their at-risk relatives, combined with intensive cancer surveillance, has an enormous cancer-preventive potential in these families. A lack of awareness may be part of the reason why the underlying germline cause remains unexplained in a large proportion of patients with CRC. Various extracolonic features, mainly dermatologic, ophthalmic, dental, endocrine, vascular, and reproductive manifestations occur in many of the cancer predisposition syndromes associated with CRC and polyposis. Some are mediated via the WNT, TGF-β, or mTOR pathways. However the pathogenesis of most features is still obscure. Here we review the extracolonic features of the main syndromes, the existing information regarding their prevalence, and the pathways involved in their pathogenesis. This knowledge could be useful for care managers from different professional disciplines, and used to raise awareness, enable diagnosis, and assist in the process of genetic testing and interpretation.

Phenotypic diversity among juvenile polyposis syndrome patients from different ethnic background

Abstract

Juvenile polyposis syndrome (JPS), has diverse phenotypes. Aim: To assess mutation rate, clinical features and genotype-phenotype correlation among Israeli JPS kindreds from different ethnicities.

Methods

Patients’ data were extracted retrospectively from 5 centers.

Results

Thirty five kindreds (49 patients) were included. Thirty one (89%) Jewish [10 (32%) Ashkenazi; 9 (29%) Sephardi; 11 (35%) non-Russia former Soviet-Union countries (NRFSU), one (3%) unknown]. 40/49 individuals from 27 families underwent genetic testing. Among them 34, from 21 families (85, 78%, respectively) had a pathogenic mutation: BMPR1A n = 15 (71%), SMAD4 n = 6 families (29%). While no SMAD4 mutation was described among Jewish families from NRFSU, 7 NRFSU families carried a founder mutation comprising a large genomic deletion of BMPR1A. GI involvement was reported in 42 patients (86%): colonic polyps (n = 40, 95%, > 50 polyps n = 14, 35%) and 12 underwent colonic resection. Fourteen patients (34%) had gastric or small bowel involvement (n = 5) and 4\14 underwent gastrectomy due to polyp burden. Families from NRFSU had more gastric involvement (66.7% vs. 22.2%- Sephardic and 20%- Ashkenazi Jews; p = 0.038), with more gastric polyps (p = 0.017).

Conclusions

We demonstrated a high rate of mutation detection in the heterogeneous population of Israel. Patients from NRFSU with BMPR1A mutation had high rate of gastric involvement.

Genetic Syndromes Associated with Gastric Cancer

Although environmental factors such as Helicobacter pylori, tobacco, and diet are major contributors to the development of gastric cancer (GC) worldwide, it is estimated that up to 5% to 10% of GC cases are due to an underlying hereditary susceptibility caused by germline pathogenic variants. Hereditary diffuse gastric cancer (HDGC) caused by germline pathogenic variants in the CDH1 gene is the principal familial GC syndrome. However, other well-established hereditary gastrointestinal syndromes have been associated with an increased risk of GC. In this review, we will discuss the latest insights and advances in our understanding of GC associated with Lynch syndrome (LS), familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP), gastric adenocarcinoma and proximal polyposis of the stomach (GAPPS), Li-Fraumeni syndrome (LFS), Peutz-Jeghers syndrome (PJS), and juvenile polyposis syndrome (JPS). We will also discuss the emergence of new associations of the homologous recombination pathway genes (BRCA1, BRCA2) with GC.

Hamartomatous polyposis syndrome associated malignancies: Risk, pathogenesis and endoscopic surveillance

Hamartomatous polyposis syndromes (HPS) are a heterogeneous spectrum of diseases that are characterized by diffuse hamartomatous polyps lining the gastrointestinal (GI) tract together with extra-GI manifestations. Classical HPS includes juvenile polyposis syndrome, Peutz-Jeghers syndrome, PTEN hamartoma tumor syndrome and hereditary mixed polyposis syndrome. Patients with HPS have a higher risk of GI and extra-GI malignancies than the general population, although the underlying mechanisms remain unclear and are obviously different from the carcinogenesis of classical adenocarcinoma and colitis-associated malignancy. In this review we aimed to clarify the risks, possible mechanism and endoscopic surveillance of HPS-associated GI malignancies.

Inherited Predisposition to Gastric Cancer

Approximately 10% of patients with gastric cancer show familial aggregation and up to 3% are related to an inherited cancer syndrome. There are multiple germline pathogenic variants and cancer syndromes associated with an increased risk of gastric cancer. Appropriate assessment of familial and genetic risk may allow a personalized approach to gastric cancer prevention through screening and risk-reducing surgeries. The ability to better identify carriers with pathogenic genetic variants associated with gastric cancer before a diagnosis of cancer requires effective genetic risk assessment and testing, followed by optimal screening and surveillance recommendations to further reduce the morbidity and mortality.

Case report of juvenile polyposis/hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia syndrome: first report in Korea with a novel mutation in the SMAD4 gene

Juvenile polyposis/hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia (JPS/HHT) syndrome is a rare, autosomal dominant disorder caused by mutations in the SMAD4 gene, presenting with features of both juvenile polyposis syndrome (JPS) and HHT. Reports and studies of JPS/HHT syndrome are mostly from Western countries, while there are scarce reports from East Asian countries. We report a case of a Korean boy who had been previously diagnosed with JPS at 7 years and had first visited to our center at 15 years of age. Genetic studies of the patient and parents revealed a novel variant in the SMAD4 gene, SMAD4 c.1146_1163del; p.His382_Val387del (NM_005359.5), which had developed de novo. Numerous pedunculated and sessile polyps were observed throughout the gastrointestinal (GI) tract. Mucocutaneous telangiectases were observed on the lips, tongue, and jejunum, and arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) were observed in both lungs. This is the first case report of JPS/HHT syndrome in Korea, with a novel deletion variant in the SMAD4 gene. Patients with JPS should undergo genetic evaluation of associated genes including SMAD4, and those with genetically confirmed SMAD4 variants should undergo further evaluation for coexisting asymptomatic AVMs in order to prevent life-threatening complications of thrombotic emboli and pulmonary hemorrhage.

Effect of systematic nursing intervention on rehabilitation after colorectal polyps of endoscopic removal in children: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Endoscopic removal is the main method for the treatment of colorectal polyps in children. Due to the small age of children, poor coordination, postoperative sensitive postoperative response, it is not good for postoperative recovery. Systematic nursing has an advantage in promoting the postoperative recovery of children with colorectal polyps of endoscopic removal, but it is lack of evidence-based basis. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effect of systematic nursing intervention on the rehabilitation of children after colorectal polyps of endoscopic removal.

METHODS

China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wanfang, China Science and Technology Journal Database and Chinese Biomedical Literature Database, PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library databases will be searched by computer. A randomized controlled study is searched on the application of systematic nursing intervention of children with colorectal polyps of endoscopic removal from the establishment of the database in February 2021. The language is limited to English and Chinese. The quality of the included study is independently extracted and the literature quality is evaluated by 2 researchers. The RevMan5.3 software is used to conduct meta-analysis of the included literature.

RESULTS

This study will evaluate the effect of systematic nursing intervention on the rehabilitation of children after colorectal polyps of endoscopic removal by the indexes of total effective rate, complication rate, and hospital stays.

CONCLUSION

This study will provide reliable evidence-based basis for establishing a reasonable and effective nursing intervention for endoscopic removal of colorectal polyps in childhood.

OSF REGISTRATION NUMBER

DOI 10.17605/OSF.IO/S57UX.

SMAD4 juvenile polyposis syndrome and hereditary haemorrhagic telangiectasia presenting in a middle-aged man as a large fungating gastric mass, polyposis in both upper and lower GI tract and iron deficiency anaemia, with no known family history

Juvenile polyposis syndrome (JPS) and hereditary haemorrhagic telangiectasia (HHT) are rare autosomal dominant diseases, where symptoms manifest at childhood. A 32-year-old man with no family history of JPS or HHT with SMAD4 gene mutation who developed signs and symptoms only at the age of 32, when he was an adult. In this article, we highlight the steps taken to diagnose this rare pathology, explain its pathophysiology and management.

Juvenile polyposis syndrome-hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia associated with a SMAD4 mutation in a girl

Juvenile polyposis syndrome (JPS) and hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia (HHT) are both relatively rare hereditary disorders. Some patients with the SMAD4 gene mutation develop both JPS and HHT, a condition termed JPS-HHT. We herein report a case of childhood-onset JPS-HHT. At nine years old, the patient underwent colonoscopy under suspicion of Crohn's disease, which revealed multiple polyps. A genetic analysis for familial adenomatous polyposis and Peutz-Jeghers syndrome found no mutations. After several years, extraintestinal manifestations, such as repeated epistaxis and several telangiectasias in the upper palate and stomach, were identified, which led to the performance of gene mutation analysis for SMAD4. As a result, a missense mutation in exon 8, codon 361 from arginine to cysteine (c.1081 C>T) was found. Based on this finding, the patient underwent cerebral magnetic resonance angiography, pulmonary perfusion scintigraphy and thoracoabdominal contrast computed tomography. The examination revealed that she had pulmonary arteriovenous fistulas and arteriovenous malformations in both the liver and right mammary gland. Thus, continuous surveillance for vascular lesions and gastrointestinal cancer is scheduled. Making a precise diagnosis of JPS-HHT can lead to the detection of asymptomatic complications and enable appropriate future disease management.

Juvenile polyposis syndrome might be misdiagnosed as familial adenomatous polyposis: a case report and literature review

BACKGROUND

Juvenile polyposis syndrome (JPS) is a rare disorder characterized by the presence of multiple juvenile polyps in the gastrointestinal tract, and germline mutations in SMAD4 or BMPR1A. Due to its rarity and complex clinical manifestation, misdiagnosis often occurs in clinical practice.

CASE PRESENTATION

A 42-year-old man with multiple pedunculated colorectal polyps and concomitant rectal adenocarcinoma was admitted to our hospital. His mother had died of colon cancer. He was diagnosed with familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) and underwent total proctocolectomy and ileal pouch anal anastomosis. Two polyps were selected for pathological examination. One polyp had cystically dilated glands with slight dysplasia. The other polyp displayed severe dysplasia and was diagnosed as adenoma. Three years later, his 21-year-old son underwent a colonoscopy that revealed more than 50 pedunculated colorectal juvenile polyps. Both patients harbored a germline pathogenic mutation in BMPR1A. Endoscopic resection of all polyps was attempted but failed. Finally, the son received endoscopic resection of polyps in the rectum and sigmoid colon, and laparoscopic subtotal colectomy. Ten polyps were selected for pathological examination. All were revealed to be typical juvenile polyps, with cystically dilated glands filled with mucus. Thus, the diagnosis of JPS was confirmed in the son. A review of the literatures revealed that patients with JPS can sometimes have adenomatous change. Most polyps in patients with JPS are benign hamartomatous polyps with no dysplasia. A review of 767 colorectal JPS polyps demonstrated that 8.5% of the polyps contained mild to moderate dysplasia, and only 0.3% had severe dysplasia or cancer. It is difficult to differentiate juvenile polyps with dysplasia from adenoma, which could explain why juvenile polyps have been reported to have adenomatous changes in patients with JPS. Therefore, patients with JPS, especially those with concomitant dysplasia and adenocarcinoma, might be easily diagnosed as FAP in clinical practice.

CONCLUSIONS

Juvenile polyp with dysplasia is often diagnosed as adenoma, which might lead to the misdiagnosis of JPS as FAP. The differential diagnosis of JPS versus FAP, should be based on comprehensive evaluation of clinical presentation, endoscopic appearance and genetic investigations; not on the presence or absence of adenoma.

Juvenile polyposis syndrome

Juvenile polyposis syndrome (JPS) patients can have a significantly high burden of polyposis. Patient who undergoes prophylactic colectomy for polyps not amenable to endoscopic treatments requires close clinical surveillance to negate risk of malignancy from interval polyposis.

Patients with 10q22.3q23.1 recurrent deletion syndrome are at risk for juvenile polyposis

Juvenile polyposis syndrome (JPS) is a rare autosomal dominant predisposition to hamartomatous polyps within the gastrointestinal tract, at high risk for malignant transformation. BMPR1A and SMAD4 loss-of-function variants account for 50% of the cases. More specifically, point mutations and structural abnormalities in BMPR1A lead to a highly penetrant yet variable phenotype of JPS. Intriguingly, in the developmental disorder caused by a recurrent 10q22.3q23.1 7 Mb deletion which includes BMPR1A, juvenile polyps have never been reported. We present the case of a young adult harboring this recurrent deletion, in a context of intellectual disability, ventricular septal defect and severe juvenile polyposis syndrome diagnosed at the age of 25 years, requiring a surgical preventive colectomy. She developed a gastric adenocarcinoma from which she died at the age of 32. We hypothesize that with the current available pangenomic CNV arrays, the diagnosis of 10q22.3q23.1 deletion is often made several years before the onset of the digestive phenotype, which could explain the absence of reports for juvenile polyps. This observation highlights the importance of an active digestive surveillance of patients with 10q22.3q23.1 deletion.

Multigene Panel Testing Increases the Number of Loci Associated with Gastric Cancer Predisposition

The main gene involved in gastric cancer (GC) predisposition is CDH1, the pathogenic variants of which are associated with diffuse-type gastric cancer (DGC) and lobular breast cancer (LBC). CDH1 only explains a fraction (10–50%) of patients suspected of DGC/LBC genetic predisposition. To identify novel susceptibility genes, thus improving the management of families at risk, we performed a multigene panel testing on selected patients. We searched for germline pathogenic variants in 94 cancer-related genes in 96 GC or LBC Italian patients with early-onset and/or family history of GC. We found CDH1 pathogenic variants in 10.4% of patients. In 11.5% of cases, we identified loss-of-function variants in BRCA1, BRCA2, PALB2, and ATM breast/ovarian cancer susceptibility genes, as well as in MSH2, PMS2, BMPR1A, PRF1, and BLM genes. In 78.1% of patients, we did not find any variants with clear-cut clinical significance; however, 37.3% of these cases harbored rare missense variants predicted to be damaging by bioinformatics tools. Multigene panel testing decreased the number of patients that would have otherwise remained genetically unexplained. Besides CDH1, our results demonstrated that GC pathogenic variants are distributed across a number of susceptibility genes and reinforced the emerging link between gastric and breast cancer predisposition.

Variable Features of Juvenile Polyposis Syndrome With Gastric Involvement Among Patients With a Large Genomic Deletion of BMPR1A

Loss-of-function mutations of BMPR1A cause juvenile polyposis syndrome (JPS), but large genomic deletions in BMPR1A are rare, reported in few families only, and data regarding the associated phenotype are limited.

Immunomodulatory Effects of TGF-β Family Signaling within Intestinal Epithelial Cells and Carcinomas

TGF-β superfamily signaling is responsible for many critical cellular functions including control of cell growth, cell proliferation, cell differentiation, and apoptosis. TGF-β appears to be critical in gastrulation, embryonic development, and morphogenesis, and it retains pleiotropic roles in many adult tissues and cell types in a highly context-dependent manner. While TGF-β signaling within leukocytes is known to have an immunosuppressive role, its immunomodulatory effects within epithelial cells and epithelial cancers is less well understood. Recent data has emerged that suggests TGF-β pathway signaling within epithelial cells may directly modulate pro-inflammatory chemokine/cytokine production and resultant leukocyte recruitment. This immunomodulation by epithelial TGF-β pathway signaling may directly impact tumorigenesis and tumor progression through modulation of the epithelial microenvironment, although causal pathways responsible for such an observation remain incompletely investigated. This review presents the published literature as it relates to the immunomodulatory effects of TGF-β family signaling within intestinal epithelial cells and carcinomas.

Management of Juvenile Polyposis Syndrome in Children and Adolescents: A Position Paper From the ESPGHAN Polyposis Working Group

The European Society for Paediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition (ESPGHAN) Polyposis Working Group developed recommendations to assist clinicians and health care providers with appropriate management of patients with juvenile polyposis. This is the first juvenile polyposis Position Paper published by ESPGHAN with invited experts. Many of the published studies were descriptive and/or retrospective in nature, consequently after incorporating a modified version of the GRADE system many of the recommendations are based on expert opinion. This ESPGHAN Position Paper provides a guide for diagnosis, assessment, and management of juvenile polyposis syndrome in children and adolescents, and will be helpful in the appropriate management and timing of procedures in children and adolescents. The formation of international collaboration and consortia is proposed to monitor patients prospectively to advance our understanding of juvenile polyposis conditions.

SMAD4 promotes TGF-β-independent NK cell homeostasis and maturation and antitumor immunity

SMAD4 is the only common SMAD in TGF-β signaling that usually impedes immune cell activation in the tumor microenvironment. However, we demonstrated here that selective deletion of Smad4 in NK cells actually led to dramatically reduced tumor cell rejection and augmented tumor cell metastases, reduced murine CMV clearance, as well as impeded NK cell homeostasis and maturation. This was associated with a downregulation of granzyme B (Gzmb), Kit, and Prdm1 in Smad4-deficient NK cells. We further unveiled the mechanism by which SMAD4 promotes Gzmb expression. Gzmb was identified as a direct target of a transcriptional complex formed by SMAD4 and JUNB. A JUNB binding site distinct from that for SMAD4 in the proximal Gzmb promoter was required for transcriptional activation by the SMAD4-JUNB complex. In a Tgfbr2 and Smad4 NK cell-specific double-conditional KO model, SMAD4-mediated events were found to be independent of canonical TGF-β signaling. Our study identifies and mechanistically characterizes unusual functions and pathways for SMAD4 in governing innate immune responses to cancer and viral infection, as well as NK cell development.

Clinicopathologic characterization of breast carcinomas in patients with non-BRCA germline mutations: results from a single institution's high-risk population

As multigene panel testing for hereditary cancer syndromes becomes commonplace, germline mutations in genes other than BRCA1/2 are increasingly identified in breast cancer patients. While histopathologic features of BRCA-mutated breast cancers have been well-characterized, less is known about non-BRCA-related hereditary cancers. We herein investigate the clinicopathologic characteristics of breast cancers in women with non-BRCA germline mutations. Out of 612 women who underwent germline testing, 16 (2.6%) women with 18 cancers had mutations in non-BRCA genes: ATM, CHEK2, PALB2, TP53, BMPR1A, BRIP1, MUTYH, and RAD50. An additional 2 cancers were identified in a woman with a diagnosis of Bloom syndrome (BLM mutation) who was not germline tested. Average age at diagnosis was 50 (range: 27-77), and 65% had no personal cancer history. The majority (79%) of tumors were grade 1 to 2; 35% were either lobular or ductal with lobular features. Stromal responses varied from absent to desmoplastic to sclerotic; 69% of cases had an in situ component. With the exception of a brisk lymphocytic response in BLM- and TP53-mutated cancers, lymphocytic infiltration was mild or absent. In summary, the majority of non-BRCA-related hereditary breast cancers represent the patient's sentinel malignancy. Lobular features were seen in a subset, and high-grade, immunogenic carcinomas were uncommon except in the setting of BLM and TP53 mutations. Overall, these findings demonstrate a range of involved genes in non-BRCA mutation carriers with breast cancer and histopathologic heterogeneity in the associated cancers, arguing against use of histomorphology to inform panel testing algorithms.

CNVs affecting cancer predisposing genes (CPGs) detected as incidental findings in routine germline diagnostic chromosomal microarray (CMA) testing

Background

Identification of CNVs through chromosomal microarray (CMA) testing is the first-line investigation in individuals with learning difficulties/congenital abnormalities. Although recognised that CMA testing may identify CNVs encompassing a cancer predisposition gene (CPG), limited information is available on the frequency and nature of such results.

Methods

We investigated CNV gains and losses affecting 39 CPGs in 3366 pilot index case individuals undergoing CMA testing, and then studied an extended cohort (n=10 454) for CNV losses at 105 CPGs and CNV gains at 9 proto-oncogenes implicated in inherited cancer susceptibility.

Results

In the pilot cohort, 31/3366 (0.92%) individuals had a CNV involving one or more of 16/39 CPGs. 30/31 CNVs involved a tumour suppressor gene (TSG), and 1/30 a proto-oncogene (gain of MET). BMPR1A, TSC2 and TMEM127 were affected in multiple cases. In the second stage analysis, 49/10 454 (0.47%) individuals in the extended cohort had 50 CNVs involving 24/105 CPGs. 43/50 CNVs involved a TSG and 7/50 a proto-oncogene (4 gains, 3 deletions). The most frequently involved genes, FLCN (n=10) and SDHA (n=7), map to the Smith-Magenis and cri-du-chat regions, respectively.

Conclusion

Incidental identification of a CNV involving a CPG is not rare and poses challenges for future cancer risk estimation. Prospective data collection from CPG-CNV cohorts ascertained incidentally and through syndromic presentations is required to determine the risks posed by specific CNVs. In particular, ascertainment and investigation of adults with CPG-CNVs and adults with learning disability and cancer, could provide important information to guide clinical management and surveillance.

Transforming Growth Factor β Superfamily Signaling in Development of Colorectal Cancer

Transforming growth factor (TGF)-β cytokines signal via a complex network of pathways to regulate proliferation, differentiation, adhesion, migration, and other functions in many cell types. A high percentage of colorectal tumors contain mutations that disrupt TGF-β family member signaling. We review how TGF-β family member signaling is altered during development of colorectal cancer, models of study, interaction of pathways, and potential therapeutic strategies.

Prophylactic total gastrectomy in the management of hereditary tumor syndromes

PURPOSE

Germline mutations in several genes confer a relevant lifetime risk of gastric cancer. In this context, an increasing involvement of a surgeon can be seen, mainly with the question of performing a prophylactic operation.

METHODS

Patients with hereditary tumor syndromes predisposing for gastric cancer who received care leading to prophylactic total gastrectomy in our Center for Hereditary Tumor Syndromes were analyzed. For each patient, the multidisciplinary decision-making process, the perioperative course, and the histopathologic findings were assessed. Short-term morbidity was evaluated based on the medical reports.

RESULTS

The analysis includes nine patients (six female, three male) with a median age of 41.6 (range 23-60) years. Indication for prophylactic total gastrectomy was based on family history and genetic analysis (eight patients with a germline mutation of the CDH1 gene and one patient with a SMAD4 mutation). Removal of the entire gastric mucosa was documented intraoperatively by fresh frozen section examination. Extended (DII) lymphadenectomy was performed in four patients. Histopathologic examination of gastrectomy specimens revealed six patients (6/9, 67 %) with multifocal signet ring cell carcinomas. In our series, prophylactic total gastrectomy was a safe procedure without mortality and low morbidity.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with hereditary syndromes predisposing for gastric cancer should be evaluated for this curative procedure in a specialized center. Further research is necessary, and the implementation of nationwide registers including patients with prophylactic gastrointestinal operations due to hereditary tumor syndrome is advisable.

Using Genetics to Identify Hereditary Colorectal Polyposis and Cancer Syndromes in Your Patient

The majority of patients with colorectal polyps and cancer do not have a Mendelian cause of the disease. Age, lifestyle, and environmental factors interact with complex genetic traits to contribute to the etiology. However, approximately 5-10 % of patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) and more than 40 % of patients meeting specific clinical features of the hereditary polyposis syndromes have a discoverable, actionable genetic cause which will significantly alter their medical management.