1
|
Peritoneal metastases in elderly patients with colorectal cancer. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY 2022; 48:2558-2564. [PMID: 35662530 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2022.05.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2022] [Revised: 04/15/2022] [Accepted: 05/16/2022] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND With the introduction of cytoreductive surgery with intraperitoneal chemotherapy and the development of new systemic anti-cancer agents, the treatment of colorectal cancer (CRC) patients with peritoneal metastases has changed. Real-world data on the treatment of elderly patients and their clinical outcomes is lacking. METHODS All CRC patients diagnosed with synchronous peritoneal metastases (SPM) during 2008-2019 (n = 7,748) were identified from the Netherlands Cancer Registry. Trends in treatment and postoperative mortality were described by age category (<70, 70-74, 75-79, ≥80 years) and period of diagnosis (2008-2013, 2014-2019). Kaplan-Meier curves were constructed, and log-rank tests were performed to evaluate differences in overall survival (OS). RESULTS With increasing age, less patients received multimodality treatment and systemic treatment. Of the patients aged <70 years, 38% underwent multimodality treatment and 35% palliative systemic therapy, declining to 4% and 12% in patients ≥80 years. A large and increasing proportion of elderly patients did not receive cancer-directed treatment, this increased from 32% in 2008-2013 to 41% in 2014-2019 in 75-79 years old patients and from 52% to 65% in ≥80 years old. Postoperative mortality decreased in all age categories over time, OS remained stable. The median OS of elderly patients ranged from 8 months in 70-74 years old to 3 months in patients aged ≥80 years. DISCUSSION Age strongly affects treatment of patients with SPM, with a large and increasing proportion of elderly patients not receiving cancer-directed treatment. Their prognosis remains very poor. There is a need for therapeutic options that are well tolerable for elderly patients.
Collapse
|
2
|
Elfrink AKE, Alberga AJ, van Berge Henegouwen MI, Scheurs WH, van der Geest LGM, Verhagen HJM, Dekker JWT, Grünhagen DJ, Wouters MWJM, Klaase JM. Outcomes After Major Surgical Procedures in Octogenarians: A Nationwide Cohort Study. World J Surg 2022; 46:2399-2408. [PMID: 35927369 PMCID: PMC9436861 DOI: 10.1007/s00268-022-06642-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/12/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
Introduction Aging of the worldwide population has been observed, and postoperative outcomes could be worse in elderly patients. This nationwide study assessed trends in number of surgical resections in octogenarians regarding various major surgical procedures and associated postoperative outcomes. Methods All patients who underwent surgery between 2014 and 2018 were included from Dutch nationwide quality registries regarding esophageal, stomach, pancreas, colorectal liver metastases, colorectal cancer, lung cancer and abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA). For each quality registry, the number of patients who were 80 years or older (octogenarians) was calculated per year. Postoperative outcomes were length of stay (LOS), 30 day major morbidity and 30 day mortality between octogenarians and younger patients. Results No increase in absolute number and proportion of octogenarians that underwent surgery was observed. Median LOS was higher in octogenarians who underwent surgery for colorectal cancer, colorectal liver metastases, lung cancer, pancreatic disease and esophageal cancer. 30 day major morbidity was higher in octogenarians who underwent surgery for colon cancer, esophageal cancer and elective AAA-repair. 30 day mortality was higher in octogenarians who underwent surgery for colorectal cancer, lung cancer, stomach cancer, pancreatic disease, esophageal cancer and elective AAA-repair. Median LOS decreased between 2014 and 2018 in octogenarians who underwent surgery for stomach cancer and colorectal cancer. 30 day major morbidity decreased between 2014 and 2018 in octogenarians who underwent surgery for colon cancer. No trends were observed in octogenarians regarding 30 day mortality between 2014 and 2018. Conclusion No increase over time in absolute number and proportion of octogenarians that underwent major surgery was observed in the Netherlands. Postoperative outcomes were worse in octogenarians. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00268-022-06642-6.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arthur K E Elfrink
- Scientific Bureau, Dutch Institute for Clinical Auditing, 2333 AA, Leiden, The Netherlands.
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Universitair Medisch Centrum Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
| | - Anna J Alberga
- Scientific Bureau, Dutch Institute for Clinical Auditing, 2333 AA, Leiden, The Netherlands
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Mark I van Berge Henegouwen
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, Locatie AMC, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Universiteit Van Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | | | | | | | - Dirk J Grünhagen
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Michel W J M Wouters
- Scientific Bureau, Dutch Institute for Clinical Auditing, 2333 AA, Leiden, The Netherlands
- Department of Surgery, Antoni Van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Joost M Klaase
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Universitair Medisch Centrum Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Giesen LJX, Olthof PB, Elferink MAG, van Westreenen HL, Beets GL, Verhoef C, Dekker JWT. Changes in rectal cancer treatment after the introduction of a national screening program; Increasing use of less invasive strategies within a national cohort. Eur J Surg Oncol 2021; 48:1117-1122. [PMID: 34872776 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2021.11.132] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/15/2021] [Revised: 11/18/2021] [Accepted: 11/26/2021] [Indexed: 10/19/2022] Open
Abstract
AIM Organ preserving treatment strategies and the introduction of a colorectal cancer-screening program have likely influenced the resection rates of rectal cancer. The aim of this study is to assess the influence of these developments on rectal cancer treatment and resection rates in the Netherlands. METHODS Patients diagnosed with non-metastatic rectal cancer between 2013 and 2018, were selected from the Netherlands Cancer Registry. The distribution of surgical and neo-adjuvant treatment and resection rates were analyzed and compared over time. RESULTS Between 2013 and 2018 22640 patients were diagnosed with non-metastatic rectal cancer. The incidence of early stage (cT1) disease increased from 141 (4%) in 2013 to 448 (12%) in 2018. The use of neoadjuvant radiotherapy and chemo-radiotherapy dropped from 39% to 21% and 34%-25%, respectively. A decrease in surgical resection rates (including TEM) was observed from 85% to 73%. The proportion of patients who underwent endoscopic resections increased from 3% to 10%. The decrease in surgical resection rates was larger in patients treated with neo-adjuvant chemo-radiotherapy. CONCLUSION An increase in stage I disease is noted after the introduction of the screening program. Surgical resection rates for rectal cancer have fallen over time. Endoscopic resections due to more early-stage disease probably accounts for a large part of this decline. Furthermore, a watch and wait approach after neo-adjuvant chemo-radiotherapy may play an important role as well.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L J X Giesen
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
| | - P B Olthof
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Surgery, Reinier de Graaf Gasthuis, Delft, the Netherlands
| | - M A G Elferink
- Department of Research and Development, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation IKNL, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | | | - G L Beets
- Department of Surgery, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - C Verhoef
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - J W T Dekker
- Department of Surgery, Reinier de Graaf Gasthuis, Delft, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Peltrini R, Imperatore N, Carannante F, Cuccurullo D, Capolupo GT, Bracale U, Caricato M, Corcione F. Age and comorbidities do not affect short-term outcomes after laparoscopic rectal cancer resection in elderly patients. A multi-institutional cohort study in 287 patients. Updates Surg 2021; 73:527-537. [PMID: 33586089 PMCID: PMC8005386 DOI: 10.1007/s13304-021-00990-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/26/2020] [Accepted: 01/28/2021] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Postoperative complications and mortality rates after rectal cancer surgery are higher in elderly than in non-elderly patients. The aim of this study is to evaluate whether, like in open surgery, age and comorbidities affect postoperative outcomes limiting the benefits of a laparoscopic approach. Between April 2011 and July 2020, data of 287 patients with rectal cancer submitted to laparoscopic rectal resection from different institutions were collected in an electronic database and were categorized into two groups: < 75 years and ≥ 75 years of age. Perioperative data and short-term outcomes were compared between these groups. Risk factors for postoperative complications were determined on multivariate analysis, including age groups and previous comorbidities as variables. Seventy-seven elderly patients had both higher ASA scores (p < 0.001) and cardiovascular disease rates (p = 0.02) compared with 210 non-elderly patients. There were no significative differences between groups in terms of overall postoperative complications (p = 0.3), number of patients with complications (p = 0.2), length of stay (p = 0.2) and death during hospitalization (p = 0.9). The only independent variables correlated with postoperative morbidity were male gender (OR 2.56; 95% CI 1.53-3.68, p < 0.01) and low-medium localization of the tumor (OR 2.12; 75% CI 1.43-4.21, p < 0.01). Although older people are more frail patients, short-term postoperative outcomes in patients ≥ 75 years of age were similar to those of younger patients after laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer. Elderly patients benefit from laparoscopic rectal resection as well as non-elderly patient, despite advanced age and comorbidities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roberto Peltrini
- Department of Public Health, School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Naples Federico II, Via Pansini 5, 80131, Naples, Italy.
| | - Nicola Imperatore
- Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy.,Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, AORN Antonio Cardarelli, Naples, Italy
| | - Filippo Carannante
- Colorectal Surgery Unit, Campus BioMedico University Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | | | | | - Umberto Bracale
- Department of Public Health, School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Naples Federico II, Via Pansini 5, 80131, Naples, Italy
| | - Marco Caricato
- Colorectal Surgery Unit, Campus BioMedico University Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Francesco Corcione
- Department of Public Health, School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Naples Federico II, Via Pansini 5, 80131, Naples, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Inter-hospital variation in resection rates of colon cancer in the Netherlands: A nationwide study. Eur J Surg Oncol 2019; 45:1882-1886. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2019.06.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/24/2019] [Revised: 06/03/2019] [Accepted: 06/07/2019] [Indexed: 01/06/2023] Open
|
6
|
Brouwer NPM, Heil TC, Olde Rikkert MGM, Lemmens VEPP, Rutten HJT, de Wilt JHW, van Erning FN. The gap in postoperative outcome between older and younger patients with stage I-III colorectal cancer has been bridged; results from the Netherlands cancer registry. Eur J Cancer 2019; 116:1-9. [PMID: 31163335 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2019.04.036] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/10/2019] [Revised: 04/22/2019] [Accepted: 04/27/2019] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
AIM OF THE STUDY Previous studies have shown that older patients benefited less than younger patients from surgical treatment for colorectal cancer (CRC). However, CRC care has advanced over time, and it is time to assess whether the difference in postoperative mortality between older and younger CRC patients is still present. METHODS Patients with primary stage I-III CRC diagnosed between 2005 and 2016 were selected from the Netherlands Cancer Registry (N = 111,778). Trends in postoperative mortality and 1-year postoperative relative survival (RS) were analysed, stratified according to age (<75 versus ≥75 years) and tumour location (colon versus rectum). One-year postoperative RS was analysed to correct for background mortality in the older population. RESULTS Between 2005 and 2016, 30-day postoperative mortality showed a stronger decrease for older patients (from 10.0% to 4.0% for colon cancer [p < 0.001] and from 8.3% to 2.7% for rectal cancer [p < 0.001]) compared with younger patients (from 2.0% to 0.9% for colon cancer [p < 0.001] and from 1.4% to 0.7% for rectal cancer [p = 0.01]). Between 2005 and 2016, also 1-year RS increased more for older patients (from 84.8% to 94.6% for colon cancer and from 86.1% to 97.2% for rectal cancer) compared with younger patients (from 94.0% to 97.8% for colon cancer and from 96.3% to 98.8% for rectal cancer). CONCLUSION Between 2005 and 2016, differences in postoperative mortality between older and younger CRC patients decreased. One-year postoperative RS was almost equal for older and younger patients in 2015-2016. This information is crucial for shared decision-making on surgical treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nelleke P M Brouwer
- Department of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Geert Grooteplein Zuid 10, 6525 GA, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
| | - Thea C Heil
- Department of Geriatrics, Radboud University Medical Center, Geert Grooteplein Zuid 10, 6525 GA, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
| | - Marcel G M Olde Rikkert
- Department of Geriatrics, Radboud University Medical Center, Geert Grooteplein Zuid 10, 6525 GA, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
| | - Valery E P P Lemmens
- Department of Research, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organization (IKNL), Godebaldkwartier 419, 3511 DT, Utrecht, the Netherlands; Department of Public Health, Erasmus University Medical Center, Doctor Molewaterplein 30, 3015 GD, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
| | - Harm J T Rutten
- Department of Surgery, Catharina Hospital, Michelangelolaan 2, 5623 EJ, Eindhoven, the Netherlands; Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, P. Debyelaan 25, 6229 HX, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
| | - Johannes H W de Wilt
- Department of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Geert Grooteplein Zuid 10, 6525 GA, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
| | - Felice N van Erning
- Department of Research, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organization (IKNL), Godebaldkwartier 419, 3511 DT, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Sheel ARG, Harrison S, Sarantitis I, Nicholson JA, Hanna T, Grocock C, Raraty M, Ramesh J, Farooq A, Costello E, Jackson R, Chapman M, Smith A, Carter R, Mckay C, Hamady Z, Aithal GP, Mountford R, Ghaneh P, Hammel P, Lerch MM, Halloran C, Pereira SP, Greenhalf W. Identification of Cystic Lesions by Secondary Screening of Familial Pancreatic Cancer (FPC) Kindreds Is Not Associated with the Stratified Risk of Cancer. Am J Gastroenterol 2019; 114:155-164. [PMID: 30353057 DOI: 10.1038/s41395-018-0395-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMNs) are associated with risk of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). It is unclear if an IPMN in individuals at high risk of PDAC should be considered as a positive screening result or as an incidental finding. Stratified familial pancreatic cancer (FPC) populations were used to determine if IPMN risk is linked to familial risk of PDAC. METHODS This is a cohort study of 321 individuals from 258 kindreds suspected of being FPC and undergoing secondary screening for PDAC through the European Registry of Hereditary Pancreatitis and Familial Pancreatic Cancer (EUROPAC). Computerised tomography, endoscopic ultrasound of the pancreas and magnetic resonance imaging were used. The risk of being a carrier of a dominant mutation predisposing to pancreatic cancer was stratified into three even categories (low, medium and high) based on: Mendelian probability, the number of PDAC cases and the number of people at risk in a kindred. RESULTS There was a median (interquartile range (IQR)) follow-up of 2 (0-5) years and a median (IQR) number of investigations per participant of 4 (2-6). One PDAC, two low-grade neuroendocrine tumours and 41 cystic lesions were identified, including 23 IPMN (22 branch-duct (BD)). The PDAC case occurred in the top 10% of risk, and the BD-IPMN cases were evenly distributed amongst risk categories: low (6/107), medium (10/107) and high (6/107) (P = 0.63). CONCLUSIONS The risk of finding BD-IPMN was independent of genetic predisposition and so they should be managed according to guidelines for incidental finding of IPMN.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A R G Sheel
- Department of Molecular and Clinical Cancer Medicine, Institute of Translational Medicine, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, L69 3GA, UK
| | - S Harrison
- Department of Molecular and Clinical Cancer Medicine, Institute of Translational Medicine, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, L69 3GA, UK
| | - I Sarantitis
- Department of Molecular and Clinical Cancer Medicine, Institute of Translational Medicine, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, L69 3GA, UK
| | - J A Nicholson
- Department of Molecular and Clinical Cancer Medicine, Institute of Translational Medicine, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, L69 3GA, UK
| | - T Hanna
- Department of Molecular and Clinical Cancer Medicine, Institute of Translational Medicine, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, L69 3GA, UK
| | - C Grocock
- Department of Molecular and Clinical Cancer Medicine, Institute of Translational Medicine, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, L69 3GA, UK
| | - M Raraty
- Department of Molecular and Clinical Cancer Medicine, Institute of Translational Medicine, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, L69 3GA, UK
| | - J Ramesh
- Department of Gastroenterology, The Royal Liverpool University Hospital, London, UK
| | - A Farooq
- Department of Radiology, The Royal Liverpool University Hospital, London, UK
| | - E Costello
- Department of Molecular and Clinical Cancer Medicine, Institute of Translational Medicine, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, L69 3GA, UK
| | - R Jackson
- Department of Molecular and Clinical Cancer Medicine, Institute of Translational Medicine, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, L69 3GA, UK
| | - M Chapman
- Institute for Liver & Digestive Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - A Smith
- Department of Pancreatico-Biliary Surgery, Leeds Teaching Hospital Trust, Leeds, UK
| | - R Carter
- West of Scotland Pancreatic unit, Glasgow Royal Infirmary, Glasgow, UK
| | - C Mckay
- West of Scotland Pancreatic unit, Glasgow Royal Infirmary, Glasgow, UK
| | - Z Hamady
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Diseases, University Hospital Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - G P Aithal
- NIHR Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust and University of Nottingham, Nottingham, NG7 2UH, UK
| | - R Mountford
- Mersey Regional Molecular Genetics Laboratory, Liverpool Women's Hospital, Liverpool, UK
| | - P Ghaneh
- Department of Molecular and Clinical Cancer Medicine, Institute of Translational Medicine, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, L69 3GA, UK
| | - P Hammel
- Service de Gastroentérologie-Pancréatologie, Pôle des Maladies de l'Appareil Digestif, Hôpital Beaujon, 92118, Clichy Cedex, France
| | - M M Lerch
- Department of Medicine A, University Medicine Greifswald, Sauerbruch-Strasse, 17475, Greifswald, Germany
| | - C Halloran
- Department of Molecular and Clinical Cancer Medicine, Institute of Translational Medicine, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, L69 3GA, UK
| | - S P Pereira
- Institute for Liver & Digestive Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - W Greenhalf
- Department of Molecular and Clinical Cancer Medicine, Institute of Translational Medicine, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, L69 3GA, UK
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Montroni I, Ugolini G, Saur NM, Spinelli A, Rostoft S, Millan M, Wolthuis A, Daniels IR, Hompes R, Penna M, Fürst A, Papamichael D, Desai AM, Cascinu S, Gèrard JP, Myint AS, Lemmens VE, Berho M, Lawler M, De Liguori Carino N, Potenti F, Nanni O, Altini M, Beets G, Rutten H, Winchester D, Wexner SD, Audisio RA. Personalized management of elderly patients with rectal cancer: Expert recommendations of the European Society of Surgical Oncology, European Society of Coloproctology, International Society of Geriatric Oncology, and American College of Surgeons Commission on Cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol 2018; 44:1685-1702. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2018.08.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 57] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/20/2018] [Revised: 07/22/2018] [Accepted: 08/03/2018] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
|
9
|
Claassen YHM, Dikken JL, Hartgrink HH, de Steur WO, Slingerland M, Verhoeven RHA, van Eycken E, de Schutter H, Johansson J, Rouvelas I, Johnson E, Hjortland GO, Jensen LS, Larsson HJ, Allum WH, Portielje JEA, Bastiaannet E, van de Velde CJH. North European comparison of treatment strategy and survival in older patients with resectable gastric cancer: A EURECCA upper gastrointestinal group analysis. Eur J Surg Oncol 2018; 44:1982-1989. [PMID: 30343998 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2018.09.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/10/2018] [Revised: 09/14/2018] [Accepted: 09/21/2018] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND As older gastric cancer patients are often excluded from randomized clinical trials, the most appropriate treatment strategy for these patients remains unclear. The current study aimed to gain more insight in treatment strategies and relative survival of older patients with resectable gastric cancer across Europe. METHODS Population-based cohorts from Belgium, Denmark, The Netherlands, Norway, and Sweden were combined. Patients ≥70 years with resectable gastric cancer (cT1-4a, cN0-2, cM0), diagnosed between 2004 and 2014 were included. Resection rates, administration of chemotherapy (irrespective of surgery), and relative survival within a country according to stage were determined. RESULTS Overall, 6698 patients were included. The percentage of operated patients was highest in Belgium and lowest in Sweden for both stage II (74% versus 56%) and stage III disease (57% versus 25%). For stage III, chemotherapy administration was highest in Belgium (44%) and lowest in Sweden (2%). Three year relative survival for stage I, II, and III disease in Belgium was 67.8% (95% CI:62.8-72.6), 41.2% (95% CI:37.3-45.2), 17.8% (95% CI:12.5-24.0), compared with 56.7% (95% CI:51.5-61.7), 31.3% (95% CI:27.6-35.2), 8.2% (95% CI:4.4-13.4) in Sweden. There were no significant differences in treatment strategies of patients with stage I disease. CONCLUSION Substantial treatment differences are observed across North European countries for patients with stages II and III resectable gastric cancer aged 70 years or older. In the present comparison, treatment strategies with a higher proportion of patients undergoing surgery seemed to be associated with higher survival rates for patients with stages II or III disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Y H M Claassen
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.
| | - J L Dikken
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - H H Hartgrink
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - W O de Steur
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - M Slingerland
- Department of Medical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - R H A Verhoeven
- Department of Research, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation (IKNL), the Netherlands
| | | | | | - J Johansson
- Department of Surgery, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - I Rouvelas
- Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology (CLINTEC), Division of Surgery, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden; Section of Esophagogastric Surgery, Centre for Digestive Diseases, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - E Johnson
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Norway; Department of Gastroenterological and Pediatric Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - G O Hjortland
- Department of Oncology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - L S Jensen
- Department of Surgery, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - H J Larsson
- The Danish National Registries, a National Quality Improvement Programme (RKKP), Aarhus, Denmark
| | - W H Allum
- Department of Surgery, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, Great Britain, UK
| | - J E A Portielje
- Department of Medical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - E Bastiaannet
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands; Department of Medical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - C J H van de Velde
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Nelen SD, van Putten M, Lemmens VEPP, Bosscha K, de Wilt JHW, Verhoeven RHA. Effect of age on rates of palliative surgery and chemotherapy use in patients with locally advanced or metastatic gastric cancer. Br J Surg 2017; 104:1837-1846. [PMID: 28791679 DOI: 10.1002/bjs.10621] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/18/2016] [Revised: 01/20/2017] [Accepted: 05/22/2017] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND This study assessed trends in the treatment and survival of palliatively treated patients with gastric cancer, with a focus on age-related differences. METHODS For this retrospective, population-based, nationwide cohort study, all patients diagnosed between 1989 and 2013 with non-cardia gastric cancer with metastasized disease or invasion into adjacent structures were selected from the Netherlands Cancer Registry. Trends in treatment and 2-year overall survival were analysed and compared between younger (age less than 70 years) and older (aged 70 years or more) patients. Analyses were done for five consecutive periods of 5 years, from 1989-1993 to 2009-2013. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to examine the probability of undergoing surgery. Multivariable Cox regression analysis was used to identify independent risk factors for death. RESULTS Palliative resection rates decreased significantly in both younger and older patients, from 24·5 and 26·2 per cent to 3·0 and 5·0 per cent respectively. Compared with patients who received chemotherapy alone, both younger (21·6 versus 6·3 per cent respectively; P < 0·001) and older (14·7 versus 4·6 per cent; P < 0·001) patients who underwent surgery had better 2-year overall survival rates. Multivariable analysis demonstrated that younger and older patients who received chemotherapy alone had worse overall survival than patients who had surgery only (younger: hazard ratio (HR) 1·22, 95 per cent c.i. 1·12 to 1·33; older: HR 1·12, 1·01 to 1·24). After 2003 there was no association between period of diagnosis and overall survival in younger or older patients. CONCLUSION Despite changes in the use of resection and chemotherapy as palliative treatment, overall survival rates of patients with advanced and metastatic gastric cancer did not improve.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S D Nelen
- Department of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - M van Putten
- Department of Research, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organization (IKNL), Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - V E P P Lemmens
- Department of Research, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organization (IKNL), Utrecht, The Netherlands.,Department of Public Health, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - K Bosscha
- Department of Surgery, Jeroen Bosch Hospital, 's -Hertogenbosch, The Netherlands
| | - J H W de Wilt
- Department of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - R H A Verhoeven
- Department of Research, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organization (IKNL), Utrecht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Challenging the dogma of colorectal peritoneal metastases as an untreatable condition: Results of a population-based study. Eur J Cancer 2016; 65:113-20. [PMID: 27497343 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2016.07.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/19/2016] [Revised: 06/28/2016] [Accepted: 07/02/2016] [Indexed: 01/26/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To determine the impact of the implementation of novel systemic regimens and locoregional treatment modalities on survival at population level in colorectal cancer (CRC) patients presenting with peritoneal metastases (PMs). METHODS All consecutive CRC patients with synchronous PM (<3 months) between 1995 and 2014 were extracted from the Eindhoven area of the Netherlands Cancer Registry. Trends in treatment and overall survival were assessed in four time periods. Multivariable regression analysis was used to analyse the impact of systemic and locoregional treatment modalities on survival. RESULTS A total of 37,036 patients were diagnosed with primary CRC between 1995 and 2014. Synchronous PM was diagnosed in 1,661 patients, of whom 55% had also metastases at other sites (n = 917) and 77% received anticancer therapy (n = 1,273). Treatment with systemic therapy increased from 23% in 1995-1999 to 56% in 2010-2014 (p < 0.0001). Cytoreductive surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS-HIPEC) was applied since 2005 and increased from 10% in 2005-2009 to 23% in 2010-2014. Surgery for lymphatic or haematogenous metastases increased from 2% to 10% in these periods. Median overall survival of the complete cohort improved from 6.0 months in 1995-2000 to 12.5 months in 2010-2014 (p < 0.0001), with a doubling of survival for both PM alone and PM with other involved sites. The influence of year of diagnosis on survival (hazard ratio, 2010-2014 versus 1995-1999; 0.5, 95% confidence interval: 0.43-0.62; p < 0.0001) disappeared after including systemic therapy and locoregional treatment modalities in subsequent multivariable models. CONCLUSION CRC patients presenting with PM are increasingly offered a multidisciplinary treatment approach, resulting in an increased overall survival for the entire cohort.
Collapse
|