1
|
Meyrat R, Vivian E, Sridhar A, Gulden RH, Bruce S, Martinez A, Montgomery L, Reed DN, Rappa PJ, Makanbhai H, Raney K, Belisle J, Castellanos S, Cwikla J, Elzey K, Wilck K, Nicolosi F, Sabat ME, Shoup C, Graham RB, Katzen S, Mitchell B, Oh MC, Patel N. Development of multidisciplinary, evidenced-based protocol recommendations and implementation strategies for anterior lumbar interbody fusion surgery following a literature review. Medicine (Baltimore) 2023; 102:e36142. [PMID: 38013300 PMCID: PMC10681460 DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000036142] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/01/2023] [Accepted: 10/25/2023] [Indexed: 11/29/2023] Open
Abstract
The anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) procedure involves several surgical specialties, including general, vascular, and spinal surgery due to its unique approach and anatomy involved. It also carries its own set of complications that differentiate it from posterior lumbar fusion surgeries. The demonstrated benefits of treatment guidelines, such as Enhanced Recovery after Surgery in other surgical procedures, and the lack of current recommendations regarding the anterior approach, underscores the need to develop protocols that specifically address the complexities of ALIF. We aimed to create an evidence-based protocol for pre-, intra-, and postoperative care of ALIF patients and implementation strategies for our health system. A 12-member multidisciplinary workgroup convened to develop an evidence-based treatment protocol for ALIF using a Delphi consensus methodology and the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) system for rating the quality of evidence and strength of protocol recommendations. The quality of evidence, strength of the recommendation and specific implementation strategies for Methodist Health System for each recommendation were described. The literature search resulted in 295 articles that were included in the development of protocol recommendations. No disagreements remained once the authors reviewed the final GRADE assessment of the quality of evidence and strength of the recommendations. Ultimately, there were 39 protocol recommendations, with 16 appropriate preoperative protocol recommendations (out of 17 proposed), 9 appropriate intraoperative recommendations, and 14 appropriate postoperative recommendations. This novel set of evidence-based recommendations is designed to optimize the patient's ALIF experience from the preoperative to the postoperative period.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Richard Meyrat
- Methodist Moody Brain and Spine Institute, Methodist Health System, Dallas, TX
| | - Elaina Vivian
- Performance Improvement, Methodist Dallas Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| | - Archana Sridhar
- Methodist Moody Brain and Spine Institute, Methodist Health System, Dallas, TX
| | - R. Heath Gulden
- Anesthesia Consultants of Dallas Division, US Anesthesia Partners, Dallas, TX
| | - Sue Bruce
- Clinical Outcomes Management, Methodist Dallas Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| | - Amber Martinez
- Pre-Surgery Assessment, Methodist Dallas Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| | - Lisa Montgomery
- Methodist Moody Brain and Spine Institute, Methodist Health System, Dallas, TX
| | - Donald N. Reed
- Neurosurgery Division, Methodist Health System, Dallas, TX
| | | | | | | | | | - Stacey Castellanos
- Methodist Moody Brain and Spine Institute, Methodist Health System, Dallas, TX
| | - Judy Cwikla
- Neurocritical Care Unit, Methodist Dallas Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| | - Kristin Elzey
- Pharmacy, Methodist Dallas Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| | - Kristen Wilck
- Clinical Nutrition, Methodist Dallas Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| | - Fallon Nicolosi
- Methodist Community Pharmacy – Dallas, Methodist Dallas Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| | - Michael E. Sabat
- Surgery and Recovery, Methodist Dallas Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| | - Chris Shoup
- Executive Office, Methodist Health System, Dallas, TX
| | - Randall B. Graham
- Methodist Moody Brain and Spine Institute, Methodist Health System, Dallas, TX
| | - Stephen Katzen
- Methodist Moody Brain and Spine Institute, Methodist Health System, Dallas, TX
| | - Bartley Mitchell
- Methodist Moody Brain and Spine Institute, Methodist Health System, Dallas, TX
| | - Michael C. Oh
- Methodist Moody Brain and Spine Institute, Methodist Health System, Dallas, TX
| | - Nimesh Patel
- Methodist Moody Brain and Spine Institute, Methodist Health System, Dallas, TX
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Toh JWT, Collins GP, Pathma-Nathan N, El-Khoury T, Engel A, Smith S, Richardson A, Ctercteko G. Attitudes towards Enhanced Recovery after Surgery (ERAS) interventions in colorectal surgery: nationwide survey of Australia and New Zealand colorectal surgeons. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2022; 407:1637-1646. [PMID: 35275247 PMCID: PMC9283181 DOI: 10.1007/s00423-022-02488-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/27/2021] [Accepted: 03/03/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Whilst Enhanced Recovery after Surgery (ERAS) has been widely accepted in the international colorectal surgery community, there remains significant variations in ERAS programme implementations, compliance rates and best practice recommendations in international guidelines. METHODS A questionnaire was distributed to colorectal surgeons from Australia and New Zealand after ethics approval. It evaluated specialist attitudes towards the effectiveness of specific ERAS interventions in improving short term outcomes after colorectal surgery. The data were analysed using a rating scale and graded response model in item response theory (IRT) on Stata MP, version 15 (StataCorp LP, College Station, TX). RESULTS Of 300 colorectal surgeons, 95 (31.7%) participated in the survey. Of eighteen ERAS interventions, this study identified eight strategies as most effective in improving ERAS programmes alongside early oral feeding and mobilisation. These included pre-operative iron infusion for anaemic patients (IRT score = 7.82 [95% CI: 6.01-9.16]), minimally invasive surgery (IRT score = 7.77 [95% CI: 5.96-9.07]), early in-dwelling catheter removal (IRT score = 7.69 [95% CI: 5.83-9.01]), pre-operative smoking cessation (IRT score = 7.68 [95% CI: 5.49-9.18]), pre-operative counselling (IRT score = 7.44 [95% CI: 5.58-8.88]), avoiding drains in colon surgery (IRT score = 7.37 [95% CI: 5.17-8.95]), avoiding nasogastric tubes (IRT score = 7.29 [95% CI: 5.32-8.8]) and early drain removal in rectal surgery (IRT score = 5.64 [95% CI: 3.49-7.66]). CONCLUSIONS This survey has demonstrated the current attitudes of colorectal surgeons from Australia and New Zealand regarding ERAS interventions. Eight of the interventions assessed in this study including pre-operative iron infusion for anaemic patients, minimally invasive surgery, early in-dwelling catheter removal, pre-operative smoking cessation, pre-operative counselling, avoidance of drains in colon surgery, avoiding nasogastric tubes and early drain removal in rectal surgery should be considered an important part of colorectal ERAS programmes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James Wei Tatt Toh
- Discipline of Surgery, Sydney Medical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia. .,Colorectal Department, Division of Surgery and Anaesthetics, Westmead Hospital, Cnr Hawkesbury and Darcy Rd, Westmead, Sydney, NSW, 2145, Australia.
| | - Geoffrey Peter Collins
- Colorectal Department, Division of Surgery and Anaesthetics, Westmead Hospital, Cnr Hawkesbury and Darcy Rd, Westmead, Sydney, NSW, 2145, Australia.,The University of Notre Dame, Sydney, Australia
| | - Nimalan Pathma-Nathan
- Discipline of Surgery, Sydney Medical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.,Colorectal Department, Division of Surgery and Anaesthetics, Westmead Hospital, Cnr Hawkesbury and Darcy Rd, Westmead, Sydney, NSW, 2145, Australia
| | - Toufic El-Khoury
- Discipline of Surgery, Sydney Medical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.,Colorectal Department, Division of Surgery and Anaesthetics, Westmead Hospital, Cnr Hawkesbury and Darcy Rd, Westmead, Sydney, NSW, 2145, Australia.,The University of Notre Dame, Sydney, Australia
| | - Alexander Engel
- Discipline of Surgery, Sydney Medical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.,Colorectal Department, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, Australia
| | - Stephen Smith
- Colorectal Department, John Hunter Hospital, Newcastle, Australia
| | - Arthur Richardson
- Upper Gastrointestinal Department, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, Australia
| | - Grahame Ctercteko
- Discipline of Surgery, Sydney Medical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.,Colorectal Department, Division of Surgery and Anaesthetics, Westmead Hospital, Cnr Hawkesbury and Darcy Rd, Westmead, Sydney, NSW, 2145, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Dudi-Venkata NN, Kroon HM, Bedrikovetski S, Lewis M, Lawrence MJ, Hunter RA, Moore JW, Thomas ML, Sammour T. Impact of STIMUlant and osmotic LAXatives (STIMULAX trial) on gastrointestinal recovery after colorectal surgery: randomized clinical trial. Br J Surg 2021; 108:797-803. [PMID: 34136900 DOI: 10.1093/bjs/znab140] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/18/2020] [Accepted: 04/06/2021] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Recovery of gastrointestinal (GI) function is often delayed after colorectal surgery. Enhanced recovery protocols (ERPs) recommend routine laxative use, but evidence of benefit is unclear. This study aimed to investigate whether the addition of multimodal laxatives to an ERP improves return of GI function in patients undergoing colorectal surgery. METHODS This was a single-centre, parallel, open-label RCT. All adult patients undergoing elective colorectal resection or having stoma formation or reversal at the Royal Adelaide Hospital between August 2018 and May 2020 were recruited into the study. The STIMULAX group received oral Coloxyl® with senna and macrogol, with a sodium phosphate enema in addition for right-sided operations. The control group received standard ERP postoperative care. The primary outcome was GI-2, a validated composite measure defined as the interval from surgery until first passage of stool and tolerance of solid intake for 24 h in the absence of vomiting. Secondary outcomes were the incidence of prolonged postoperative ileus (POI), duration of hospital stay, and postoperative complications. The analysis was performed on an intention-to-treat basis. RESULTS Of a total of 170 participants, 85 were randomized to each group. Median GI-2 was 1 day shorter in the STIMULAX compared with the control group (median 2 (i.q.r. 1.5-4) versus 3 (2-5.5) days; 95 per cent c.i. -1 to 0 days; P = 0.029). The incidence of prolonged POI was lower in the STIMULAX group (22 versus 38 per cent; relative risk reduction 42 per cent; P = 0.030). There was no difference in duration of hospital day or 30-day postoperative complications (including anastomotic leak) between the STIMULAX and control groups. CONCLUSION Routine postoperative use of multimodal laxatives after elective colorectal surgery results in earlier recovery of gastrointestinal function and reduces the incidence of prolonged POI. Registration number: ACTRN12618001261202 (www.anzctr.org.au).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- N N Dudi-Venkata
- Colorectal Unit, Department of Surgery, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.,Discipline of Surgery, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - H M Kroon
- Colorectal Unit, Department of Surgery, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.,Discipline of Surgery, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - S Bedrikovetski
- Colorectal Unit, Department of Surgery, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.,Discipline of Surgery, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - M Lewis
- Colorectal Unit, Department of Surgery, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - M J Lawrence
- Colorectal Unit, Department of Surgery, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - R A Hunter
- Colorectal Unit, Department of Surgery, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - J W Moore
- Colorectal Unit, Department of Surgery, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.,Discipline of Surgery, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - M L Thomas
- Colorectal Unit, Department of Surgery, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.,Discipline of Surgery, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - T Sammour
- Colorectal Unit, Department of Surgery, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.,Discipline of Surgery, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| |
Collapse
|