Effects of CDX2 on prognosis and chemotherapy responsiveness in mismatch repair-deficient colorectal cancer

Mitochondrial DNA Copy Number as a Biomarker for Guiding Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Stages II and III Colorectal Cancer Patients with Mismatch Repair Deficiency: Seeking Benefits and Avoiding Harms

BACKGROUND

Colorectal cancer (CRC) patients with mismatch repair-deficient/microsatellite instability-high (dMMR/MSI-H) status are conventionally perceived as unresponsive to adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT). The mitochondrial transcription factor A (TFAM) is required for mitochondrial DNA copy number (mtDNA-CN) expression. In light of previous findings indicating that the frequent truncating-mutation of TFAM affects the chemotherapy resistance of MSI CRC cells, this study aimed to explore the potential of mtDNA-CN as a predictive biomarker for ACT efficacy in dMMR CRC patients.

METHODS

Levels of MtDNA-CN were assessed using quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) in a cohort of 308 CRC patients with dMMR comprising 180 stage II and 128 stage III patients. Clinicopathologic and therapeutic data were collected. The study examined the association between mtDNA-CN levels and prognosis, as well as the impact of ACT benefit on dMMR CRC patients. Subgroup analyses were performed based mainly on tumor stage and mtDNA-CN level. Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression models were used to evaluate the effect of mtDNA-CN on disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

A substantial reduction in mtDNA-CN expression was observed in tumor tissue, and higher mtDNA-CN levels were correlated with improved DFS (73.4% vs 85.7%; P = 0.0055) and OS (82.5% vs 90.3%; P = 0.0366) in dMMR CRC patients. Cox regression analysis identified high mtDNA-CN as an independent protective factor for DFS (hazard ratio [HR] 0.547; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.321-0.934; P = 0.0270) and OS (HR 0.520; 95% CI 0.272-0.998; P = 0.0492). Notably, for dMMR CRC patients with elevated mtDNA-CN, ACT significantly improved DFS (74.6% vs 93.4%; P = 0.0015) and OS (81.0% vs 96.7%; P = 0.0017), including those with stage II or III disease.

CONCLUSIONS

The mtDNA-CN levels exhibited a correlation with the prognosis of stage II or III CRC patients with dMMR. Elevated mtDNA-CN emerges as a robust prognostic factor, indicating improved ACT outcomes for stages II and III CRC patients with dMMR. These findings suggest the potential utility of mtDNA-CN as a biomarker for guiding personalized ACT treatment in this population.

Potential predictors for CDX2 expression loss and mismatch repair deficiency in colorectal cancer

CDX2 expression loss is commonly associated with mismatch repair deficiency (dMMR) in colorectal cancer (CRC). However, there are only a few studies that have attempted to correlate CDX2 expression loss with specific MMR genes (MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, PMS2). This is a retrospective study of 327 patients who underwent surgery due to CRC. Nine patients (2.9%) had two synchronous CRCs, making the total sample 336 CRC. Histopathological data such as tumor type, tumor grade, perineural, lymphatic, and vascular invasion, pT stage, pN stage, peritumoral and intratumoral lymphocytic infiltration were collected and recorded in the database. After immunohistochemical analysis, CDX2 expression, MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, and PMS2 deficiency were also recorded. CDX2 expression loss was detected in 19 out of 336 CRCs (5.9%) and was associated with ascending colon CRC, partially mucinous adenocarcinoma, poorly differentiated carcinoma, and dMMR. Forty-four (13.1%) of CRCs were dMMR. We found a statistically significant association between CDX2 expression loss and MLH1 and PMS2 deficiency. Considering that most expression phenotypes include pairs of MMR genes, we analyzed MLH1/PMS2 and MSH2/MSH6 as heterodimers. Analysis of heterodimers showed a similar result, namely, that MLH1/PMS2 heterodimer deficiency was significantly associated with CDX2 expression loss. We also constructed a regression model for CDX2 expression loss and for dMMR. Poor tumor differentiation and MLH1/PMS2 heterodimer deficiency have been identified as potential predictors for CDX2 expression loss. CRC in the ascending colon and CDX2 expression loss have been identified as positive potential predictors of dMMR with rectal cancer as negative potential predictor of dMMR. Our study showed a significant association between CDX2 expression loss and MLH1 and PMS2 deficiency in CRC. We also managed to produce a regression model for CDX2 expression and showed that poor tumor differentiation and MLH1/PMS2 heterodimer deficiency are independent factors for CDX2 expression loss. We were the first to include CDX2 expression in a regression model for dMMR and showed that CDX2 expression loss can be used as a predictive factor for dMMR, which should be confirmed by further studies.

Pattern of Expression of CDX2 in Colorectal Cancer and its Role in Prognosis: An Ambispective Observational Study

Introduction Caudal-type homeobox 2 (CDX2), a nuclear protein, is essential for the proliferation and development of intestinal epithelial cells and is frequently downregulated during tumorigenesis. CDX2 inhibits cell growth as well as stimulates differentiation by activating intestinal specific genes, thus lack of CDX2 favors tumor growth and aggressiveness.

Objectives We aimed to evaluate the pattern of CDX2 expression in all stages of colorectal cancer (CRC) and study its association with baseline characteristics and prognosis.

Materials and Methods Study was conducted as an ambispective observational study, enrolling cases of CRC retrospectively from January 2014 to July 2016 (30 months), and prospectively during next 18-month period till January 2018. We performed CDX2 staining by immunohistochemistry on the available biopsy blocks of CRC patients during the study period. Total 286 patients were registered during the study period, of which only 110 biopsy blocks were available for staining. CDX2 scoring was done by a semiquantitative method on whole tissue section for the intensity and percentage of the cells showing positivity. Correlation of CDX2 expression was done with baseline clinical and histopathologic characteristics, and survival.

Results Of 110 patients, 77 (70%) constituted colon cancer and 33 (30%) were rectal cancer. The median age was 54.2 years, 62 (56.4%) being male and 48 (43.6%) female with male-to-female ratio 1.3:1. In the study cohort, 33 (30%) patients had stage II disease, 30 (27.3%) stage III, and 47 (42.7%) were stage IV. Seventy-three (66.4%) were positive for CDX2 and 37 (33.4%) were negative. Loss of CDX2 expression was significantly associated with advanced stage, rectal site, poor grade of differentiation, and presence of lymphovascular invasion (LVSI). With median follow-up of 16 months, progression-free survival (PFS) at 2 years was 30% for CDX2 negative patients compared with 67% for CDX2 positive (p = 0.009), while overall survival (OS) at 2 years was 46% for CDX2 negative versus 77% for positive patients (p = 0.01).

Conclusion Loss of CDX2 expression is associated with advanced stage, higher tumor grade, presence of LVSI, and worse PFS and OS and thereby functions as a poor prognostic factor in CRC.

Loss of CDX2 in colorectal cancer is associated with histopathologic subtypes and microsatellite instability but is prognostically inferior to hematoxylin-eosin-based morphologic parameters from the WHO classification

BACKGROUND

Immunohistochemical loss of CDX2 has been proposed as a biomarker of dismal survival in colorectal carcinoma (CRC), especially in UICC Stage II/III. However, it remains unclear, how CDX2 expression is related to central hematoxylin-eosin (HE)-based morphologic parameters defined by 2019 WHO classification and how its prognostic relevance is compared to these parameters.

METHODS

We evaluated CDX2 expression in 1003 CRCs and explored its prognostic relevance compared to CRC subtypes, tumour budding and WHO grade in the overall cohort and in specific subgroups.

RESULTS

CDX2-low/absent CRCs were enriched in specific morphologic subtypes, right-sided and microsatellite-instable (MSI-H) CRCs (P < 0.001) and showed worse survival characteristics in the overall cohort/UICC Stage II/III (e.g. DFS: P = 0.005) and in microsatellite stable and left-sided CRCs, but not in MSI-H or right-sided CRCs. Compared with CDX2, all HE-based markers showed a significantly better prognostic discrimination in all scenarios. In multivariate analyses including all morphologic parameters, CDX2 was not an independent prognostic factor.

CONCLUSION

CDX2 loss has some prognostic impact in univariate analyses, but its prognostic relevance is considerably lower compared to central HE-based morphologic parameters defined by the WHO classification and vanishes in multivariate analyses incorporating these factors.

Loss of CDX-2 expression is an independent poor prognostic biomarker in patients with early-stage deficient mismatch repair colorectal cancer

AIM

To investigate the clinicopathological factors, molecular features, and prognostic implications associated with loss of Caudal-related homeobox transcription factor 2 (CDX-2) expression in colorectal cancer (CRC) patients.

METHODS

Immunohistochemistry for CDX-2 expression was performed on formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded primary CRC tissue samples from 449 patients. Correlation between CDX-2 expression and clinicopathological and molecular characteristics was evaluated. Univariate and multivariate survival analyses were performed to determine the prognostic value of loss of CDX-2 expression.

RESULTS

Of 449 patients, 84% were stage I-III. CDX-2-negative expression was identified in 18 of 441 (4.1%) patients. Loss of CDX-2 expression was more commonly found in patients with right-sided tumors rather than left-sided tumors (odds ratio [OR] = 3.57; p = 0.009), deficient mismatch repair (dMMR) compared to proficient MMR (pMMR) (OR = 3.7; p = 0.012), and BRAF mutation compared to BRAF wild type (OR = 8.06; p = 0.002). Univariate analysis revealed that stage I-III CRC patients with loss of CDX-2 expression had significantly worse overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) than those with positive CDX-2 expression (5-year OS = 33.3% vs. 74.6%, respectively; p < 0.001, and 5-year DFS: 42.9% vs. 69.5%, respectively; p = 0.004). Loss of CDX-2 expression remained significantly associated with worse OS compared to positive CDX-2 expression in multivariate analysis (hazard ratio [HR] = 2.4; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.12-5.11; p = 0.023).

CONCLUSIONS

Loss of CDX-2 expression was found to be associated with right-sided tumor, dMMR status, and BRAF mutation. Moreover, loss of CDX-2 expression is a poor prognostic factor for OS in stage I-III, even among patients with dMMR tumors.

Assessment of mismatch repair deficiency, CDX2, beta-catenin and E-cadherin expression in colon cancer: molecular characteristics and impact on prognosis and survival - an immunohistochemical study

Microsatellite instability (MSI) or the deficiency of mismatch repair (MMR) proteins is one of the molecular pathways of colorectal tumorigenesis and may have important clinical implications in predicting the treatment response. We evaluated the relationship between clinicopathological features and MMR proteins [mutL homologue 1 (MLH1), mutS homologue 2 (MSH2), mutS homologue 6 (MSH6), postmeiotic segregation increased 2 (PMS2)], adhesion molecules (E-cadherin, beta-catenin) and caudal-type homeobox 2 (CDX2) in 31 patients with colon adenocarcinoma, using immunohistochemistry. We also aimed to assess the prognostic value of the studied proteins. MLH1 loss was correlated to PMS2 loss (p=0.006) and MSH2 loss (p=0.023); MSH2 loss was significantly associated to MSH6 loss (p=0.011). Tumors with MSH6 loss, together with tumors with PMS2 loss, covered all the patients with MSI status. We found a significant correlation between MSI tumors and mucinous histological type (p=0.03), but no significant associations with other clinicopathological features or with survival rate. There was a significant correlation between E-cadherin expression and differentiation degree (p=0.018) and between beta-catenin expression and lymph node invasion (p=0.046). No significant association between CDX2 loss and any clinical or pathological features was found (p>0.05). No significant differences were identified in overall survival according to E-cadherin, beta-catenin or CDX2 expression (p>0.05). In our study, PMS2 loss was significantly correlated with CDX2 loss (p=0.03). In conclusion, the molecular analysis of biological markers for colon cancer may be important for patient stratification, in order to select the optimal treatment algorithm. Our results suggest that probably the double panel (MSH6 and PMS2) is enough to detect the MSI status, instead of using the quadruple panel.

Prognostic significance of MUC2, CDX2 and SOX2 in stage II colorectal cancer patients

Background

Colorectal cancer (CRC) remains a serious health concern worldwide. Despite advances in diagnosis and treatment, about 15 to 30% of stage II CRC patients subjected to tumor resection with curative intent, develop disease relapse. Moreover, the therapeutic strategy adopted after surgery is not consensual for these patients. This supports the imperative need to find new prognostic and predictive biomarkers for stage II CRC.

Methods

For this purpose, we used a one-hospital series of 227 stage II CRC patient samples to assess the biomarker potential of the immunohistochemical expression of MUC2 mucin and CDX2 and SOX2 transcription factors. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to generate disease-free survival curves that were compared using the log-rank test, in order to determine prognosis of cases with different expression of these proteins, different mismatch repair (MMR) status and administration or not of adjuvant chemotherapy.

Results

In this stage II CRC series, none of the studied biomarkers showed prognostic value for patient outcome. However low expression of MUC2, in cases with high expression of CDX2, absence of SOX2 or MMR-proficiency, conferred a significantly worst prognosis. Moreover, cases with low expression of MUC2 showed a significantly clear benefit from treatment with adjuvant chemotherapy.

Conclusion

In conclusion, we observe that patients with stage II CRC with low expression of MUC2 in the tumor respond better when treated with adjuvant chemotherapy. This observation supports that MUC2 is involved in resistance to fluorouracil-based adjuvant chemotherapy and might be a promising future predictive biomarker in stage II CRC patients.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12885-021-08070-6.

Mismatch repair phenotype determines the implications of tumor grade and CDX2 expression in stage II-III colon cancer

Mismatch repair (MMR) deficiency is an indicator of good prognosis in localized colon cancer but also associated with lack of expression of caudal-type homeobox transcription factor 2 (CDX2) and high tumor grade; markers that in isolation indicate a poor prognosis. Our study aims to identify clinically relevant prognostic subgroups by combining information about tumor grade, MMR phenotype, and CDX2 expression. Immunohistochemistry for MMR proteins and CDX2 was performed in 544 patients with colon cancer stage II-III, including a cohort from a randomized trial. In patients with proficient MMR (pMMR) and CDX2 negativity, hazard ratio (HR) for cancer death was 2.93 (95% CI 1.23-6.99, p = 0.015). Cancer-specific survival for pMMR/CDX2-negative cases was 35.8 months (95% CI 23.4-48.3) versus 52.1-53.5 months (95% CI 45.6-58.6, p = 0.001) for the remaining cases (CDX2-positive tumors or deficient MMR (dMMR)/CDX2-negative tumors). In our randomized cohort, high tumor grade was predictive of response to adjuvant fluorouracil-levamisole in pMMR patients, with a significant interaction between tumor grade and treatment (p = 0.036). For pMMR patients, high tumor grade was a significant marker of poor prognosis in the surgery-only group (HR 4.60 (95% CI 1.68-12.61), p = 0.003) but not in the group receiving chemotherapy (HR 0.66 (95% CI 0.15-3.00), p = 0.587). To conclude, patients with pMMR and CDX2 negativity have a very poor prognosis. Patients with pMMR and high-graded tumors have a poor prognosis but respond well to adjuvant chemotherapy. CDX2 expression and tumor grade did not impact prognosis in patients with dMMR.

CDX2 Loss With Microsatellite Stable Phenotype Predicts Poor Clinical Outcome in Stage II Colorectal Carcinoma

Current risk factors in stage II colorectal carcinoma are insufficient to guide treatment decisions. Loss of CDX2 has been shown to associate with poor clinical outcome and predict benefit for adjuvant chemotherapy in stage II and III colorectal carcinoma. The prognostic relevance of CDX2 in stage II disease has not been sufficiently validated, especially in relation to clinical risk factors, such as microsatellite instability (MSI) status, BRAF mutation status, and tumor budding. In this study, we evaluated the protein expression of CDX2 in tumor center and front areas in a tissue microarrays material of stage II colorectal carcinoma patients (n=232). CDX2 expression showed a partial or total loss in respective areas in 8.6% and 10.9% of patient cases. Patients with loss of CDX2 had shorter disease-specific survival when scored independently either in tumor center or tumor front areas (log rank P=0.012; P=0.012). Loss of CDX2 predicted survival independently of other stage II risk factors, such as MSI status and BRAF mutation status, pT class, and tumor budding (hazard ratio=5.96, 95% confidence interval=1.55-22.95; hazard ratio=3.70, 95% confidence interval=1.30-10.56). Importantly, CDX2 loss predicted inferior survival only in patients with microsatellite stable, but not with MSI-high phenotype. Interestingly, CDX2 loss associated with low E-cadherin expression, tight junction disruption, and high expression of ezrin protein. The work demonstrates that loss of CDX2 is an independent risk factor of poor disease-specific survival in stage II colorectal carcinoma. Furthermore, the study suggests that CDX2 loss is linked with epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition independently of tumor budding.

The Impact of Extramural Venous Invasion in Colorectal Cancer: A Detailed Analysis Based on Tumor Location and Evaluation Methods

This study aimed to elucidate the prognostic implications of extramural venous invasion (EMVI) in colorectal cancer (CRC) through a meta-analysis. Eighteen eligible studies were included in this meta-analysis. Data on the prevalence of EMVI and the correlation between EMVI and survival were collected from these studies. In addition, a subgroup analysis was conducted based on tumor location and evaluation methods. The estimated prevalence of EMVI was 28.3% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 23.1% to 34.0%) in patients with CRC. The estimated prevalence of EMVI in patients with colon cancer and rectal cancer was 23.0% (95% CI = 17.6% to 29.6%) and 35.7% (95% CI = 22.3% to 51.6%), respectively. Based on the evaluation method, the estimated prevalence of EMVI were 28.3% (95% CI = 23.2% to 34.1%) and 27.3% (95% CI = 8.4% to 60.6%) in pathologic and radiologic examinations, respectively. The correlation of EMVI with worse overall and disease-free survival rates was significant (hazard ratio = 1.773, 95% CI = 1.483-2.120, and hazard ratio = 2.059, 95% CI = 1.683-2.520, respectively). However, in the subgroup analysis with radiologic examination, there was no significant difference in survival rates between patients with and without EMVI. Our study showed that EMVI was frequently detected in 28.3% of patients with CRC and was correlated to worse survival. The detection of EMVI can be useful for predicting the prognosis of patients with CRC.