1
|
Schultz JD, Yuly JL, Arsenault EA, Parker K, Chowdhury SN, Dani R, Kundu S, Nuomin H, Zhang Z, Valdiviezo J, Zhang P, Orcutt K, Jang SJ, Fleming GR, Makri N, Ogilvie JP, Therien MJ, Wasielewski MR, Beratan DN. Coherence in Chemistry: Foundations and Frontiers. Chem Rev 2024; 124:11641-11766. [PMID: 39441172 DOI: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.3c00643] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/25/2024]
Abstract
Coherence refers to correlations in waves. Because matter has a wave-particle nature, it is unsurprising that coherence has deep connections with the most contemporary issues in chemistry research (e.g., energy harvesting, femtosecond spectroscopy, molecular qubits and more). But what does the word "coherence" really mean in the context of molecules and other quantum systems? We provide a review of key concepts, definitions, and methodologies, surrounding coherence phenomena in chemistry, and we describe how the terms "coherence" and "quantum coherence" refer to many different phenomena in chemistry. Moreover, we show how these notions are related to the concept of an interference pattern. Coherence phenomena are indeed complex, and ambiguous definitions may spawn confusion. By describing the many definitions and contexts for coherence in the molecular sciences, we aim to enhance understanding and communication in this broad and active area of chemistry.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jonathan D Schultz
- Department of Chemistry, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27708, United States
- Department of Chemistry, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois 60208, United States
| | - Jonathon L Yuly
- Lewis-Sigler Institute for Integrative Genomics, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey 08540, United States
- Department of Physics, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27708, United States
| | - Eric A Arsenault
- Department of Chemistry, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, California 94720, United States
- Department of Chemistry, Columbia University, New York, New York 10027, United States
| | - Kelsey Parker
- Department of Chemistry, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27708, United States
| | - Sutirtha N Chowdhury
- Department of Chemistry, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27708, United States
| | - Reshmi Dani
- Department of Chemistry, University of Illinois, Urbana, Illinois 61801, United States
| | - Sohang Kundu
- Department of Chemistry, University of Illinois, Urbana, Illinois 61801, United States
| | - Hanggai Nuomin
- Department of Chemistry, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27708, United States
| | - Zhendian Zhang
- Department of Chemistry, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27708, United States
| | - Jesús Valdiviezo
- Department of Chemistry, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27708, United States
- Department of Biological Chemistry and Molecular Pharmacology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, United States
- Department of Cancer Biology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts 02215, United States
- Sección Química, Departamento de Ciencias, Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú, San Miguel, Lima 15088, Peru
| | - Peng Zhang
- Department of Chemistry, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27708, United States
| | - Kaydren Orcutt
- Department of Chemistry, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, California 94720, United States
- Molecular Biophysics and Integrated Bioimaging Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California 94720, United States
- Bioproducts Research Unit, Western Regional Research Center, Agricultural Research Service, United States Department of Agriculture, 800 Buchanan Street, Albany, California 94710, United States
| | - Seogjoo J Jang
- Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Queens College, City University of New York, Queens, New York 11367, United States
- Chemistry and Physics PhD programs, Graduate Center, City University of New York, New York, New York 10016, United States
| | - Graham R Fleming
- Department of Chemistry, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, California 94720, United States
| | - Nancy Makri
- Department of Chemistry, University of Illinois, Urbana, Illinois 61801, United States
- Department of Physics, University of Illinois, Urbana, Illinois 61801, United States
- Illinois Quantum Information Science and Technology Center, University of Illinois, Urbana, Illinois 61801, United States
| | - Jennifer P Ogilvie
- Department of Physics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109, United States
| | - Michael J Therien
- Department of Chemistry, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27708, United States
| | - Michael R Wasielewski
- Department of Chemistry, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois 60208, United States
| | - David N Beratan
- Department of Chemistry, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27708, United States
- Department of Physics, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27708, United States
- Department of Biochemistry, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27710, United States
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Sayer T, Montoya-Castillo A. Efficient formulation of multitime generalized quantum master equations: Taming the cost of simulating 2D spectra. J Chem Phys 2024; 160:044108. [PMID: 38270238 DOI: 10.1063/5.0185578] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/31/2023] [Accepted: 12/26/2023] [Indexed: 01/26/2024] Open
Abstract
Modern 4-wave mixing spectroscopies are expensive to obtain experimentally and computationally. In certain cases, the unfavorable scaling of quantum dynamics problems can be improved using a generalized quantum master equation (GQME) approach. However, the inclusion of multiple (light-matter) interactions complicates the equation of motion and leads to seemingly unavoidable cubic scaling in time. In this paper, we present a formulation that greatly simplifies and reduces the computational cost of previous work that extended the GQME framework to treat arbitrary numbers of quantum measurements. Specifically, we remove the time derivatives of quantum correlation functions from the modified Mori-Nakajima-Zwanzig framework by switching to a discrete-convolution implementation inspired by the transfer tensor approach. We then demonstrate the method's capabilities by simulating 2D electronic spectra for the excitation-energy-transfer dimer model. In our method, the resolution of data can be arbitrarily coarsened, especially along the t2 axis, which mirrors how the data are obtained experimentally. Even in a modest case, this demands O(103) fewer data points. We are further able to decompose the spectra into one-, two-, and three-time correlations, showing how and when the system enters a Markovian regime where further measurements are unnecessary to predict future spectra and the scaling becomes quadratic. This offers the ability to generate long-time spectra using only short-time data, enabling access to timescales previously beyond the reach of standard methodologies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas Sayer
- Department of Chemistry, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, Colorado 80309, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Gelin MF, Chen L, Domcke W. Equation-of-Motion Methods for the Calculation of Femtosecond Time-Resolved 4-Wave-Mixing and N-Wave-Mixing Signals. Chem Rev 2022; 122:17339-17396. [PMID: 36278801 DOI: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.2c00329] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
Femtosecond nonlinear spectroscopy is the main tool for the time-resolved detection of photophysical and photochemical processes. Since most systems of chemical interest are rather complex, theoretical support is indispensable for the extraction of the intrinsic system dynamics from the detected spectroscopic responses. There exist two alternative theoretical formalisms for the calculation of spectroscopic signals, the nonlinear response-function (NRF) approach and the spectroscopic equation-of-motion (EOM) approach. In the NRF formalism, the system-field interaction is assumed to be sufficiently weak and is treated in lowest-order perturbation theory for each laser pulse interacting with the sample. The conceptual alternative to the NRF method is the extraction of the spectroscopic signals from the solutions of quantum mechanical, semiclassical, or quasiclassical EOMs which govern the time evolution of the material system interacting with the radiation field of the laser pulses. The NRF formalism and its applications to a broad range of material systems and spectroscopic signals have been comprehensively reviewed in the literature. This article provides a detailed review of the suite of EOM methods, including applications to 4-wave-mixing and N-wave-mixing signals detected with weak or strong fields. Under certain circumstances, the spectroscopic EOM methods may be more efficient than the NRF method for the computation of various nonlinear spectroscopic signals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maxim F Gelin
- School of Science, Hangzhou Dianzi University, Hangzhou 310018, China
| | - Lipeng Chen
- Max-Planck-Institut für Physik komplexer Systeme, Nöthnitzer Strasse 38, D-01187 Dresden, Germany
| | - Wolfgang Domcke
- Department of Chemistry, Technical University of Munich, D-85747 Garching,Germany
| |
Collapse
|