Toxicologic analysis of 35 drugs in post mortem human blood samples with focus on antihypertensive and antiarrhythmic drugs

Antiarrhythmic and antihypertensive drugs are frequently encountered in post mortem analysis, and the question may arise as to whether they were administered in therapeutic doses, and if they were taken in accidental, intentional, or suicidal overdose scenarios. Therefore, a novel analytical method was developed and validated for the quantification of 35 drugs with toxicological relevance, including antihypertensive and antiarrhythmic drugs (ajmaline, amlodipine, amiodarone, atenolol, bisoprolol, carvedilol, clonidine, desethylamiodarone, diltiazem, donepezil, doxazosin, dronedarone, esmolol, flecainide, lercanidipine, lidocaine, metoprolol, nebivolol, nimodipine, pindolol, prajmaline, propafenone, propranolol, sotalol, urapidil, and verapamil), as well as other medications commonly found in combination (sildenafil, tadalafil, atorvastatin, clopidogrel, dapoxetine, memantine, pentoxifylline, rivastigmine, and ivabradine). The method enables simultaneous identification and quantification in blood samples using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS). Validation exhibited excellent linearity across the concentration range for all analytes. Precision and accuracy were within acceptable limits, with bias and relative standard deviation (RSD) values consistently below 9 % and 10 %, respectively. Selectivity and specificity assessments confirmed the absence of any interference from contaminants or co-extracted drugs. The method demonstrated very high sensitivity, with limits of detection (LOD) as low as 0.01 ng/ml and limits of quantification (LOQ) as low as 0.04 ng/ml. Extraction recovery exceeded 57.5 % for all analytes except atenolol, and matrix effects were <17 % for all analytes except pindolol. Processed sample stability evaluations revealed consistent results with acceptable deviations for all analytes. In addition, the method was specifically tested for the use in post mortem analysis. The applicability of our method was demonstrated by the analysis of two authentic human autopsy blood samples.

Postmortem redistribution of drugs: a literature review

Postmortem drug analysis is crucial in identifying the potential cause and manner of death. However, it is threatened by a significant phenomenon called postmortem redistribution (PMR), which refers to the alterations in drug levels occurring after death. This review aims to describe the PMR phenomenon, the mechanisms involved in the PMR of drugs, the various methods used to predict it, and various artifacts of postmortem drug concentrations. Several mechanisms, including passive diffusion from solid organs that act as drug reservoirs to the surrounding tissues, cadaveric changes after death (e.g., cell death, blood coagulation, hypostasis, and movements), and the putrefactive process, can result in artifacts of postmortem drug concentrations. The drug's chemical and pharmacokinetic properties (such as acidic/basic properties, lipophilicity, protein binding, high volume of distribution, and residual metabolic activity) are additional factors. Several markers, including cardiac blood-to-peripheral blood ratio (C/P), liver-to-peripheral blood ratio (L/P), amino acid markers such as methionine, quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) approach, and F factor, have been proposed for interpreting the liability of drugs to PMR. Several artifacts may affect the reliability of postmortem drug analysis. Peripheral blood is preferred for postmortem drug sample collection. Numerous laboratories evaluate the redistribution potential of drugs after death using the C/P concentration ratio. Nevertheless, the L/P concentration ratio is proposed to be a more reliable marker for PMR determination.

The Use of Intravenous Lidocaine in Perioperative Medicine: Anaesthetic, Analgesic and Immune-Modulatory Aspects

This narrative review provides an update on the applied pharmacology of lidocaine, its clinical scope in anaesthesia, novel concepts of analgesic and immune-modulatory effects as well as the current controversy around its use in perioperative opioid-sparing multi-modal strategies. Potential benefits of intravenous lidocaine in the context of cancer, inflammation and chronic pain are discussed against concerns of safety, toxicity and medico-legal constraints.

Measurement of lidocaine and 2,6-dimethylaniline in minipig plasma, skin, and dermal tapes using UHPLC with electrospray MS/MS

Sensitive LC-MS/MS methods were developed to measure lidocaine and its metabolite 2,6-dimethylaniline (2,6-DMA) with application to transdermal studies. The methods for lidocaine in minipig plasma, tissue biopsies, and dermal tapes utilized mixed mode/SCX solid phase extraction, with lower quantitation limits of 25 pg/mL in plasma, 15 ng/g tissue, and 5 ng/tape. 2,6-DMA was measured in plasma and skin tissue homogenates by ultrafiltration and (for tissue) by further derivatization with 4-methoxybenzoyl chloride to form the corresponding benzamide derivative, which extended the lower limit of quantitation to 200 pg/mL. The methods allowed local measurement of lidocaine in stratum corneum, punch biopsies, and plasma and of 2,6-DMA in plasma and biopsies obtained from minipigs dosed with experimental transdermal formulations. Quantitation limits were approximately 7-fold lower than previously reported for lidocaine and 3-fold lower for 2,6-DMA.