Association between serum low-density neutrophils and acute-onset and recurrent Guillain-Barré syndrome

Efgartigimod in the treatment of Guillain-Barré syndrome

BACKGROUND

Guillain-Barré Syndrome (GBS) is caused by immunoglobulin G (IgG) autoantibodies. Efgartigimod, a human IgG antibody Fc fragment that acts as a natural ligand for the FcRn, can increase IgG degradation, which thus may be a promising therapeutic drug for GBS.

CASE PRESENTATION

The two patients presented with postinfectious and acute flaccid paralysis. On admission, they were bedridden. Nerve conduction studies indicated peripheral neuropathy. GBS was suspected and they are treated with two doses of efgartigimod (10 mg/kg) within 5 days. Their muscle strength improved gradually and 4 weeks after the initial dose, they could walk independently. Following the first dose, Patient 1 complaint of muscle soreness, which subsided the next morning. Patient 2 was intubated due to respiratory failure the day after the initial dose, and did not report other adverse effects.

DISCUSSION

In GBS patients, two doses of efgartigimod (10 mg/kg) were effective in rapidly improving muscle strength, with a satisfactory safety profile. The findings suggest a potential role for efgartigimod in modifying the disease process in GBS patients.

CONCLUSION

Efgartigimod seems effective and safe in the treatment of GBS. This study indicates the potential role of efgartigimod as a novel treatment option for GBS. Well-designed clinical trials should be conducted.

The analysis of serum lipids profile in Guillain-Barre syndrome

Background

Guillain-Barre syndrome (GBS) is an immune-mediated inflammatory peripheral neuropathy. This study aimed to conduct a systematic analysis of the serum lipids profile in GBS.

Methods

We measured the serum lipids profile in 85 GBS patients and compared it with that of 85 healthy controls matched for age and sex. Additionally, we analyzed the correlation between lipids and the severity, subtypes, precursor infections, clinical outcomes, clinical symptoms, immunotherapy, and other laboratory markers of GBS.

Results

Compared to the healthy controls, GBS exhibited significantly elevated levels of Apolipoprotein B (APOB), Apolipoprotein C2 (APOC2), Apolipoprotein C3 (APOC3), Apolipoprotein E (APOE), triglycerides (TG), and residual cholesterol (RC). Conversely, Apolipoprotein A1 (APOA1), Apolipoprotein A2 (APOA2), and high-density lipoprotein (HDL) were substantially lower in GBS. Severe GBS displayed noticeably higher levels of APOC3 and total cholesterol (TC) compared to those with mild disease. Regarding different clinical outcomes, readmitted GBS demonstrated higher RC expression than those who were not readmitted. Moreover, GBS who tested positive for neuro-virus antibody IGG in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) exhibited heightened expression of APOC3 in comparison to those who tested negative. GBS with cranial nerve damage showed significantly reduced expression of HDL and APOA1 than those without such damage. Additionally, GBS experiencing limb pain demonstrated markedly decreased HDL expression. Patients showed a significant reduction in TC after intravenous immunoglobulin therapy. We observed a significant positive correlation between lipids and inflammatory markers, including TNF-α, IL-1β, erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), white blood cells, monocytes, and neutrophils in GBS. Notably, APOA1 exhibited a negative correlation with ESR. Furthermore, our findings suggest a potential association between lipids and the immune status of GBS.

Conclusion

The research demonstrated a strong connection between lipids and the severity, subtypes, clinical outcomes, precursor infections, clinical symptoms, immunotherapy, inflammation, and immune status of GBS. This implies that a low-fat diet or the use of lipid-lowering medications may potentially serve as an approach for managing GBS, offering a fresh viewpoint for clinical treatment of this condition.

The clinical significance of systemic immune-inflammation index and platelet/neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio in Guillain-Barré syndrome

OBJECTIVE

Systemic immune-inflammation index (SII) and platelet/neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (P/NLR) are two novel hematological inflammatory indices, this study invested the role of SII and P/NLR in Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS).

METHODS

A total of 115 GBS patients and 120 healthy controls were enrolled in this retrospective study, SII and P/NLR were calculated from the value of complete blood counts. The Hughes Functional Grading Scale (HFGS) score on admission and at discharge was used to evaluate the severity and short-term outcome of GBS. The level of SII and P/NLR was compared between GBS patients and healthy controls, and the correlation between SII, P/NLR, and GBS's severity as well as poor short-term outcome was analyzed.

RESULTS

Increased SII (p < 0.001) and decreased P/NLR (p < 0.001) were observed in patients with GBS and the level of SII (p = 0.689) and P/NLR (p = 0.879) was not different between GBS subtypes. Patients with severe GBS and poor short-term outcomes had higher levels of SII and lower levels of P/NLR (p < 0.05), SII was positively correlated and P/NLR was negatively correlated with the HFGS score on admission and at discharge (p < 0.05). To predict severe GBS, the optimal cutoff value of SII was 620.87 (AUC0.633, sensitivity 60.8 % and specificity 60.9 %, p = 0.014), the optimal cutoff value of P/NLR was 53.11 (AUC0.635, sensitivity 45.1 %, specificity 82.8 %, p = 0.013). The SII level of 620.87 was found to be optimal predictive cutoff value for the poor short-term outcome of GBS (AUC 0.728, sensitivity of 82.6 %, specificity of 59.8 %, p = 0.001), the P/NLR level of 62.80 was found to be optimal predictive cutoff value for the poor short-term outcome of GBS (AUC 0.669, sensitivity 60.9 %, specificity 71.7 %, p = 0.012). Both SII>620.87 (p = 0.005) and P/NLR<53.11 (p = 0.002) were independent risk factors for severe GBS, and SII>620.87 (p = 0.035) was independently associated with the poor short-term outcome of GBS.

CONCLUSION

SII and P/NLR may be useful biomarkers to reflect GBS patients' severity and short-term outcome.

Emerging biomarkers to predict clinical outcomes in Guillain-Barré syndrome

INTRODUCTION

Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) is an immune-mediated poly(radiculo)neuropathy with a variable clinical outcome. Identifying patients who are at risk of suffering from long-term disabilities is a great challenge. Biomarkers are useful to confirm diagnosis, monitor disease progression, and predict outcome.

AREAS COVERED

The authors provide an overview of the diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers for GBS, which are useful for establishing early treatment strategies and follow-up care plans.

EXPERT OPINION

Detecting patients at risk of developing a severe outcome may improve management of disease progression and limit potential complications. Several clinical factors are associated with poor prognosis: higher age, presence of diarrhea within 4 weeks of symptom onset, rapid and severe weakness progression, dysautonomia, decreased vital capacity and facial, bulbar, and neck weakness. Biological, neurophysiological and imaging measures of unfavorable outcome include multiple anti-ganglioside antibodies elevation, increased serum and CSF neurofilaments light (NfL) and heavy chain, decreased NfL CSF/serum ratio, hypoalbuminemia, nerve conduction study with early signs of demyelination or axonal loss and enlargement of nerve cross-sectional area on ultrasound. Depicting prognostic biomarkers aims at predicting short-term mortality and need for cardio-pulmonary support, long-term patient functional outcome, guiding treatment decisions and monitoring therapeutic responses in future clinical trials.

The neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio as a prognostic biomarker in Guillain-Barre syndrome: a systematic review with meta-analysis

Background and objectives

Guillain-Barre syndrome (GBS) is an immune-mediated neuropathy. This has raised the possibility that the neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) may be a biomarker of its activity. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to summarize the evidence of NLR as a potential biomarker for GBS.

Methods

We systematically searched databases (PubMed, Ovid-Medline, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, SciELO Citation Index, LILACS, and Google Scholar) until October 2021 for studies evaluating pre-treatment NLR values in GBS patients. A meta-analysis using a random-effects model to estimate pooled effects was realized for each outcome and a narrative synthesis when this was not possible. Subgroup and sensitivity analysis were realized. GRADE criteria were used to identify the certainty of evidence for each result.

Results

Ten studies from 745 originally included were selected. Regarding GBS patients versus healthy controls, a meta-analysis of six studies (968 patients) demonstrated a significant increase in NLR values in GBS patients (MD: 1.76; 95% CI: 1.29, 2.24; I2 = 86%) with moderate certainty due to heterogeneity of GBS diagnosis criteria used. Regarding GBS prognosis, assessed by Hughes Score ≥ 3, NLR had a sensitivity between 67.3 and 81.5 and a specificity between 67.3 and 87.5 with low certainty due to imprecision, and heterogeneity. In relation to respiratory failure, NLR had a sensitivity of 86.5 and specificity of 68.2 with high and moderate certainty, respectively.

Discussion

With moderate certainty, mean NLR is higher in GBS patients compared to healthy controls. Furthermore, we found that NLR could be a prognostic factor for disability and respiratory failure with low and moderate certainty, respectively. These results may prove useful for NLR in GBS patients; however, further research is needed.

Systematic review registration

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/, identifier: CRD42021285212.