Are there hemodynamic implications related to an axillary arch?

Ultrasound Detection of the Axillary Arch as a Cause of Thoracic Outlet Syndrome: A Prospective Dissection-Controlled Cadaver Study

Ultrasound as a diagnostic tool in thoracic outlet syndrome (TOS) is becoming increasingly important. The aim of this study was to investigate the diagnostic value of ultrasound in detecting the axillary arch, an ancillary muscle potentially causing TOS. Two hundred upper limbs of 100 fresh, non-frozen, non-embalmed body donors were screened for axillary arches. Sonographic findings were validated by anatomic dissection. Twelve axillary arches were found in 200 upper extremities, corresponding to a prevalence of 8.0% per individual and 6.0% per upper extremity investigated. Ultrasound had low diagnostic performance in identifying axillary arches, with a sensitivity of 66.7% and specificity of 95.7%. There was a tendency to identify more easily arches consisting of purely muscle tissue. Axillary arch thickness, its cross-sectional area and the predominant tissue type were associated with compression of the neurovascular bundle during shoulder elevation. Ultrasound seems to have limited potential to identify axillary arches. However, arches consisting predominantly of muscle tissue may be identified more easily and were associated with compression of neurovascular structures, thus potentially causing symptoms. Further clinical trials are needed to clarify the true value of ultrasound in patients with symptoms of TOS.

Prevalence and anatomy of the axillary arch and its implications in surgical practice: A meta-analysis

PURPOSE

The following research aimed to investigate the prevalence and anatomical features of the axillary arch (AA) - a muscular, tendinous or musculotendinous slip arising from the latissimus dorsi and that terminates in various structures around the shoulder girdle. The AA may complicate axillary lymph node biopsy or breast reconstruction surgery and may cause thoracic outlet syndrome.

METHODS

Major electronic databases were thoroughly searched for studies on the AA and its variations. Data regarding the prevalence, morphology, laterality, origin, insertion and innervation of the AA was extracted and included in this meta-analysis. The AQUA tool was used in order to assess potential risk of bias within the included studies.

RESULTS

The AA was reported in 29 studies (10,222 axillas), and its pooled prevalence estimate in this meta-analysis was found to be 5.3% of the axillas: unilaterally (61.6%) and bilaterally (38.4%). It was predominantly muscular (55.1% of the patients with the AA), originated from the latissimus dorsi muscle or tendon (87.3% of the patients with the AA), inserted into the pectoralis major muscle or fascia (35.2% of the patients with the AA), and was most commonly innervated by the thoracodorsal nerve (39.9% of the patients with the AA).

CONCLUSION

The AA is a relatively common variant, hence it should not be neglected. Oncologists and surgeons should consider this variant while diagnosing an unknown palpable mass in the axilla, as the arch might mimic a neoplasm or enlarged lymph nodes.

Axillary arch may affect axillary lymphadenectomy

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to identify the axillopectoral muscle anomaly commonly known as Langer's axillary arch, and to understand its importance in surgical procedures of the axilla.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between 2009 and 2011, 758 patients underwent sentinel lymph node biopsy, axillary dissection, or both. Patients with Langer's axillary arch were identified and assessed retrospectively. The decision to cut or preserve the axillary arch was made based on clinical judgment, and patients were followed-up accordingly to monitor for adverse outcomes.

RESULTS

Of the 758 patients who underwent axillary procedures, 9 (1.2%) were found to have a Langer's axillary arch. In 2 patients the arch was cut, and in 7 patients it was preserved. No adverse outcomes were identified in any of the patients upon follow-up.

CONCLUSION

Langer's axillary arch is a unique anatomic anomaly of the axillary region that may be problematic due to the potential risks of lymphedema and vascular or nerve compression. It is important for surgeons and radiologists alike to be aware of this anatomic variation in order to properly identify it and respond appropriately based on clinical judgment, and to complete close follow-up of the patient due to the potentially increased risk of adverse outcomes.

The innervation of the axillary arch determined by surface stimulodetection electromyography

The axillary arch (AA) is a muscular anatomical variation in the fossa axillaris that has been extensively studied in cadaveric specimens. Within these dissections, different innervations of the AA have been proposed, but this has never been explored in vivo. Knowledge of the innervation of the AA is required in order to better understand its function (e.g. predisposition for certain sports and/or activities, understanding shoulder injuries in overhead sports). Here, we report on the use of surface stimulodetection electromyography (SSEMG) to resolve the innervation of the AA in 20 subjects (12 women, eight men - mean age of 21.3 ± 2.7 years) with a uni- or bilateral AA. SSEMG of each muscle [M. latissimus dorsi (MLD) and M. pectoralis major] was performed with a four-channel electrostimulation measuring system in order to determine the innervation of the AA. The results showed co-contraction of the MLD in 85% of the subjects after AA stimulation. In the remaining subjects, no specific localized response was observed due to non-specific nerve stimulation, inherent to the proximity of the brachial plexus in these individuals. Our findings demonstrate that SSEMG exploration offers a practical and reliable tool for investigating anatomical aspects of muscle innervation in vivo. Using this approach, we conclude that the AA receives the same innervation as the MLD (the N. thoracodorsalis), and may be considered a muscular extension of the latter.