Lateral femoral cutaneous nerve transposition: Renaissance of an old concept in the light of new anatomy

Preoperative Ultrasound-Guided Localization of the Lateral Femoral Cutaneous Nerve: From Guide Wire to Novel Clip

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Lateral femoral cutaneous nerve (LFCN) decompression and transposition are surgical treatment options for meralgia paresthetica. Identifying the LFCN during surgery may be challenging, and preoperative localization is a valuable adjunct in this case. The objective of this study was to explore a new technique using preoperative ultrasound-guided clip localization (USCL) of the LFCN.

METHODS

After Institutional Review Board approval, data were collected on patients who underwent both preoperative ultrasound-guided wire localization (USWL) and USCL over the past 13 years. Skin-to-nerve time was calculated prospectively.

RESULTS

Fifty-six patients were identified, 51 had USWL and 5 had USCL; the skin-to-nerve median time was 7.5 and 6 minutes, respectively. Six wires were misplaced, and this was at the beginning of utilization of the USWL technique. There were no nerve injury, infection, or bleeding complications related to either wire or clip placement.

CONCLUSION

USWL or USCL is safe and time-efficient in LFCN surgeries.

Meralgia Paresthetica: Relevance, Diagnosis, and Treatment

BACKGROUND

Pain and sensory disturbance in the distribution of the lateral femoral cutaneous nerve in the ventrolateral portion of the thigh is called meralgia paresthetica (MP). The incidence of MP has risen along with the increasing prevalence of obesity and diabetes mellitus and was recently estimated at 32 new cases per 100 000 persons per year. In this review, we provide an overview of current standards and developments in the diagnosis and treatment of MP.

METHODS

This review is based on publications retrieved by a selective literature search, with special attention to meta-analyses, systematic reviews, randomized and controlled trials (RCTs), and prospective observational studies.

RESULTS

The diagnosis is mainly based on typical symptoms combined with a positive response to an infiltration procedure. In atypical cases, electrophysiological testing, neurosonography, and magnetic resonance imaging can be helpful in establishing the diagnosis. The literature search did not reveal any studies of high quality. Four prospective observational studies with small case numbers and partly inconsistent results are available. In a meta-analysis of 149 cases, pain relief was described after infiltration in 85% of cases and after surgery in 80%, with 1-38 months of follow-up. In another meta-analysis of 670 cases, there was pain relief after infiltration in 22% of cases, after surgical decompression in 63%, and after neurectomy in 85%. Hardly any data are available on more recent treatment options, such as radiofrequency therapy, spinal cord stimulation, or peripheral nerve stimulation.

CONCLUSION

The state of the evidence is limited in both quantity and quality, corresponding to evidence level 2a for surgical and non-surgical methods. Advances in imaging and neurophysiological testing have made the diagnosis easier to establish. When intervention is needed, good success rates have been achieved with surgery (decompression, neurectomy), and variable success rates with infiltration.

Lateral femoral cutaneous nerve transposition

Lateral femoral cutaneous neuropathy, also known as meralgia paresthetica, is a pathology commonly encountered by neurosurgeons. Symptoms include numbness, tingling, and burning pain over the anterolateral thigh due to impingement on the lateral femoral cutaneous nerve (LFCN). Surgical treatment has traditionally involved nerve release or neurectomy. LFCN transposition is a relatively new approach that can provide excellent symptomatic relief. In this video, the authors highlight key operative techniques to ensure easy identification, adequate decompression, and transposition of the nerve. Key steps include ultrasound-guided wire localization, superficial decompression, opening of the inguinal ligament, deep decompression, and medial transposition. The video can be found here: https://stream.cadmore.media/r10.3171/2022.10.FOCVID2289.

Meralgia Paresthetica

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review article summaries the epidemiology, etiology, clinical presentations, and latest treatment modalities of meralgia paresthetica, including the latest data about peripheral and spinal cord stimulation therapy. Meralgia paresthetica (MP) causes burning, stinging, or numbness in the anterolateral part of the thigh, usually due to compression of the lateral femoral cutaneous nerve (LFCN).

RECENT FINDINGS

There are emerging data regarding the benefit of interventional pain procedures, including steroid injection and radiofrequency ablation, and other interventions including spinal cord and peripheral nerve stimulation reserved for refractory cases. The strength of evidence for treatment choices in meralgia paraesthetica is weak. Some observational studies are comparing local injection of corticosteroid versus surgical interventions. However, more extensive studies are needed regarding the long-term benefit of peripheral and spinal cord stimulation therapy.

Medical and surgical treatment of meralgia paresthetica

Meralgia paresthetica (MP) is a painful mononeuropathy that causes paresthesia, tingling, stinging or a burning sensation in the thigh's anterolateral part due to the entrapment of the lateral femoral cutaneous nerve under the inguinal ligament. The treatment options for MP include conservative or interventional management and must follow an algorithm. The objective is to eliminate the underlying cause if known. In the present study, four patients with MP who were successfully treated with either conservative or interventional management are presented. The advantages and disadvantages of neurolysis (decompression and transposition) and neurectomy procedures for surgical treatments are discussed.

Fine architecture of the fascial planes around the lateral femoral cutaneous nerve at its pelvic exit: an epoxy sheet plastination and confocal microscopy study

OBJECTIVE

Meralgia paresthetica is commonly caused by mechanical entrapment of the lateral femoral cutaneous nerve (LFCN). The entrapment often occurs at the site where the nerve exits the pelvis. Its optimal surgical management remains to be established, partly because the fine architecture of the fascial planes around the LFCN has not been elucidated. The aim of this study was to define the fascial configuration around the LFCN at its pelvic exit.

METHODS

Thirty-six cadavers (18 female, 18 male; age range 38-97 years) were used for dissection (57 sides of 30 cadavers) and sheet plastination and confocal microscopy (2 transverse and 4 sagittal sets of slices from 6 cadavers). Thirty-four healthy volunteers (19 female, 15 male; age range 20-62 years) were examined with ultrasonography.

RESULTS

The LFCN exited the pelvis via a tendinous canal within the internal oblique-iliac fascia septum and then ran in an adipose compartment between the sartorius and iliolata ligaments inferior to the anterior superior iliac spine (ASIS). The iliolata ligaments newly defined and termed in this study were 2-3 curtain strip-like structures which attached to the ASIS superiorly, were interwoven with the fascia lata inferomedially, and continued laterally as skin ligaments anchoring to the skin. Between the sartorius and tensor fasciae latae, the LFCN ran in a longitudinal ligamental canal bordered by the iliolata ligaments.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrated that 1) the pelvic exit of the LFCN is within the internal oblique aponeurosis and 2) the iliolata ligaments form the part of the fascia lata over the LFCN and upper sartorius. These results indicate that the internal oblique-iliac fascia septum and iliolata ligaments may make the LFCN susceptible to mechanical entrapment near the ASIS. To surgically decompress the LFCN, it may be necessary to incise the oblique aponeurosis and iliac fascia medial to the LFCN tendinous canal and to free the iliolata ligaments from the ASIS.

Dynamic decompression of the lateral femoral cutaneous nerve to treat meralgia paresthetica: technique and results

OBJECTIVE

The results of lateral femoral cutaneous nerve (LFCN) decompression to treat idiopathic meralgia paresthetica (iMP) vary widely. Techniques to decompress the LFCN differ, which may affect outcome, but in MP it is unknown to what extent. The authors present a new technique using dynamic decompression and discuss the outcomes.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was performed in a consecutive series of 19 cases. The goal of decompression was pain relief and recovery of sensation. The plane ventral to the LFCN was decompressed by cutting the fascia lata and the inferior aspect of the inguinal ligament. The plane dorsal to the LFCN was decompressed by cutting the fascia of the sartorius muscle. Subsequently, the thigh was brought in full range of flexion and extension/abduction. The authors identified and additionally cut fibers that tightened and caused compression at various locations of the LFCN during movement in all patients, referring to this technique as dynamic decompression. Postoperatively, an independent neurologist scored pain and sensation on a 4-point scale: completely resolved, improved, not changed, or worsened. Patients scored their remaining pain or sensory deficit as a percentage of the preoperative level. Statistical assessment was done using ANOVA to assess the association between outcome and duration of preoperative symptoms, BMI, and length of follow-up.

RESULTS

In 17 of the 19 cases (89%), the pain and/or paresthesia completely resolved. Patients in the remaining 2 cases (11%) experienced 70% and 80% reduction in pain. Sensation completely recovered in 13 of the 19 cases (69%). In 5 of the 19 cases (26%) sensation improved, but an area of hypesthesia remained. Four of these 5 patients indicated a sensory improvement of more than 75%, and the remaining patient had 50% improvement. Sensation remained unchanged in 1 case (5%) with persisting hypesthesia and mild hyperesthesia. There was no significant impact of preoperative symptom duration, BMI, and length of follow-up on postoperative outcome.

CONCLUSIONS

Dynamic decompression of the LFCN is an effective technique for the treatment of iMP. Most patients become completely pain free and sensation recovers considerably.

Transposition of the lateral femoral cutaneous nerve

OBJECTIVE

Meralgia paresthetica causes pain, burning, and loss of sensation in the anterolateral thigh. Surgical treatment traditionally involves neurolysis or neurectomy of the lateral femoral cutaneous nerve (LFCN). After studying and publishing data on the anatomical feasibility of LFCN transposition, the author presents here the first case series of patients who underwent LFCN transposition.

METHODS

Nineteen patients with meralgia paresthetica were treated in the Department of Neurological Surgery at University of Wisconsin between 2011 and 2016; 4 patients underwent simple decompression, 5 deep decompression, and 10 medial transposition. Data were collected prospectively and analyzed retrospectively. No randomization was performed. The groups were compared in terms of pain scores (based on a numeric rating scale) and reoperation rates.

RESULTS

The numeric rating scale scores dropped significantly in the deep-decompression (p = 0.148) and transposition (p < 0.0001) groups at both the 3- and 12-month follow-up. The reoperation rates were significantly lower in the deep-decompression and transposition groups (p = 0.0454) than in the medial transposition group.

CONCLUSIONS

Both deep decompression and transposition of the LFCN provide better results than simple decompression. Medial transposition confers the advantage of mobilizing the nerve away from the anterior superior iliac spine, giving it a straighter and more relaxed course in a softer muscle bed.

Histopathologic changes inside the lateral femoral cutaneous nerve obtained from patients with persistent symptoms of meralgia paresthetica

BACKGROUND

In patients with persistent symptoms of meralgia paresthetica, a neurectomy of the lateral femoral cutaneous nerve (LFCN) can be performed to alleviate pain symptoms. The neurectomy procedure can be performed either as a primary procedure or after failure of a previously performed neurolysis or decompression of the LFNC (secondary neurectomy). The goal of the present study was to quantify the histopathologic changes inside the LFCN obtained from patients with persistent symptoms of meralgia paresthetica, and specifically to compare to what extend these changes are present after primary versus secondary neurectomy.

METHODS

A total of 39 consecutive cases were analyzed microscopically: in 29 cases, the neurectomy had been performed as primary procedure, in 10 cases, after failed neurolysis. Intraneural changes were quantified for the (1) thickening of perineurium, (2) deposition of mucoid, and (3) percentage of collagen. Analysis was performed at three levels: proximal to, at, and distal to the previous site of compression. In addition, correlations were investigated for the duration of symptoms and the body mass index (BMI) of the patient.

RESULTS

Intraneural changes were found consistently in all cases. There was no significant difference for the primary and secondary neurectomy groups. There was also no relation with the previous site of compression. There was a weak correlation between the occurrence of intraneural changes and the duration of symptoms, although this difference was not statistically significant.

CONCLUSIONS

Histopathological changes in this study were found in all patients with persistent symptoms of meralgia paresthetica regardless of a previously performed neurolysis procedure. This finding suggests that the intraneural changes that occur in persistent meralgia paresthetica are largely irreversible and support the surgical strategy of neurectomy as an alternative to neurolysis, also for primary surgical treatment and not only after failure of neurolysis.

Anatomic Variation in Patient with Lateral Femoral Cutaneous Nerve Entrapment Neuropathy

BACKGROUND

We report a surgical case of entrapment neuropathy of lateral femoral cutaneous nerve (LFCN) with anatomical variation.

CASE DESCRIPTION

This 53-year-old man had a 10-year history of paresthesia and pain in the right anterolateral thigh exacerbated by prolonged standing and walking. His symptoms improved completely but transiently by LFCN block. The diagnosis was LFCN entrapment. Because additional treatment with drugs and repeat LFCN block was ineffective, we performed surgical decompression under local anesthesia. A nerve stimulator located the LFCN 4.5 cm medial to the anterior superior iliac spine. It formed a sharp curve and was embedded in connective tissue. Proximal dissection showed it to run parallel to the femoral nerve at the level of the inguinal ligament. The inguinal ligament was partially released to complete dissection/release. Postoperatively, his symptoms improved and the numeric rating scale fell from 8 to 1.

CONCLUSION

We report a rare anatomical variation in the course of the LFCN.