The prognostic significance of non-sentinel lymph node metastasis in cutaneous and acral melanoma patients-A multicenter retrospective study

Prognostic value of the number of biopsied sentinel lymph nodes for Chinese patients with melanoma: A single-center retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) helps to determine accurate pathological stages and facilitates strategies for regional disease control in melanoma. However, whether the number of biopsied sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) influences the patients' survival is rarely investigated.

METHODS

Acral or cutaneous melanoma patients with no history of nodal disease who received SLNB in Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center (FUSCC) from January 1, 2017, to December 31, 2021 were retrospectively enrolled. Clinicopathological variables including Breslow index, ulceration, number of positive SLNs, SLN/non-SLN status were analyzed. The pathologic nodal (pN) stage and pathological stage were defined.

RESULTS

A total of 381 eligible patients were enrolled in this study, of whom 132 (34.7%) patients were diagnosed with SLN-positive. The median number of biopsied SLNs was 2 (range: 1 to 20). Different numbers of biopsied SLNs did not influence the release-free survival (RFS) of the general patients. However, patients with >2 SLNs had a longer RFS than those with 1-2 SLNs in T4, N1a group and those who rejected complete lymph node dissection (CLND).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with T4 melanomas, N1a melanomas and those that did not undergo a CLND, the prognosis of those with three or more SLNs retrieved seemed to be improved.

Prediction of nonsentinel lymph node metastasis in acral melanoma with positive sentinel lymph nodes

BACKGROUND

Metastasis in a nonsentinel lymph node (non-SLN) is an unfavorable independent prognostic factor in cutaneous melanoma (CM). Recent data did suggest potential value of completion lymph node dissection (CLND) in CM patients with non-SLN metastasis. Prediction of non-SLN metastasis assists clinicians in deciding on adjuvant therapy without CLND. We analyzed risk factors and developed a prediction model for non-SLN status in acral melanoma (AM).

METHODS

This retrospective study enrolled 656 cases of melanoma who underwent sentinel lymph node biopsy at Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center from 2009 to 2017. We identified 81 SLN + AM patients who underwent CLND. Clinicopathologic data, including SLN tumor burden and non-SLN status were examined with Cox and Logistics regression models.

RESULTS

Ulceration, Clark level, number of deposits in the SLN (NumDep) and maximum size of deposits (MaxSize) are independent risk factors associated with non-SLN metastases. We developed a scoring system that combines ulceration, the cutoff values of Clark level V, MaxSize of 2 mm, and NumDep of 5 to predict non-SLN metastasis with an efficiency of 85.2% and 100% positive predictive value in the high-rank group (scores of 17-24).

CONCLUSIONS

A scoring system that included ulceration, Clark level, MaxSize, and NumDep is reliable and effective for predicting non-SLN metastasis in SLN-positive AM.

A real-world study of adjuvant anti-PD -1 immunotherapy on stage III melanoma with BRAF, NRAS, and KIT mutations

BACKGROUND

Melanoma frequently harbors BRAF, NRAS, or KIT mutations which influence both tumor development and treatment strategies. For example, it is still controversial whether adjuvant anti-PD-1 monotherapy or BRAF/MEK inhibitors may better improve the survival for resected BRAF-mutant melanoma. Furthermore, outcomes for melanoma with NRAS and KIT mutation receiving adjuvant immunotherapy remain unclear.

METHODS

One hundred seventy-four stage III melanoma patients who underwent radical surgery in Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center (FUSCC) during January 2017 to December 2021 were included in this real-world study. Patients were followed up until death or May 30th, 2022. Pearson's chi-squared test or Fisher's exact test was performed for univariable analysis of the different category groups. Log-rank analysis was used to identify the prognostic factors for disease-free survival (DFS).

RESULTS

There were 41 (23.6%) patients with BRAF mutation, 31 (17.8%) with NRAS mutation, 17 (9.8%) with KIT mutation, and 85 (48.9%) wild-type patients without either genomic alteration of those three genes. Most ( n  = 118, 67.8%) of them were acral melanoma, while 45 (25.9%) were cutaneous subtype, and 11 were (6.3%) primary unknown. Among them, 115 (66.1%) patients received pembrolizumab or toripalimab monotherapy as adjuvant therapy; 22 (12.6%) patients received high-dose interferon (IFN), and 37 (21.3%) patients were just for observation. There was no statistical difference in clinicopathologic factors between anti-PD-1 group and IFN/OBS group. Of all the enrolled patients, anti-PD-1 group had a better DFS than IFN/OBS group ( p  = 0.039). In anti-PD-1 group, patients with BRAF or NRAS mutations had poorer DFS than wild-type group. No survival difference was found among patients harboring different gene mutations in IFN/OBS group. In wild-type patients, anti-PD-1 group had a better DFS than IFN/OBS group ( p  = 0.003), while no survival benefits were found for patients with BRAF, NRAS, or KIT mutations.

CONCLUSION

Although anti-PD-1 adjuvant therapy provides a better DFS in the general population and in wild-type patients, patients with BRAF, KIT or, especially, NRAS mutation may not benefit further from immunotherapy than conventional IFN treatment or observation.

Prognostic Factors and Outcomes of Cutaneous Malignant Melanoma: A 174-Patient Cohort Study in a Tertiary Hospital in Thailand

BACKGROUND

Malignant melanoma is a common skin cancer among Asians. However, some features, such as tumor type and initial stages, are not comparable with those found in Western countries. We audited a large cohort of patients at a single tertiary referral hospital in Thailand to identify factors affecting the prognosis.

METHODS

A retrospective study was conducted of patients diagnosed with cutaneous malignant melanoma between 2005 and 2019. Details of demographic data, clinical characteristics, pathological reports, treatments, and outcomes were collected. Statistical analyses of overall survival and factors affecting survival were investigated.

RESULTS

The study enrolled 174 patients (79 men and 95 women) with pathologically confirmed cutaneous malignant melanoma. Their mean age was 63 years. The most common clinical presentation was a pigmented lesion (40.8%), with the plantar area being the most common site (25.9%). The mean duration of onset and hospitalization was 17.5 months. The 3 most common types of melanoma were acral lentiginous (50.7%), nodular (28.9%), and superficial spreading (9.9%). Eighty-eight cases (50.6%) had concomitant ulceration. Pathological stage III was the most common (42.1%). The 5-year overall survival was 43%, and the median survival time was 3.91 years. Multivariate analysis showed that clinically palpable lymph nodes, distant metastasis, a Breslow thickness ≥ 2 mm, and evidence of lymphovascular invasion were poor prognostic factors for overall survival.

CONCLUSIONS

In our study, most patients with cutaneous melanoma presented with a higher pathological stage. Independent factors affecting survival are palpable lymph nodes, distant metastases, Breslow thickness, and the presence of lymphovascular invasion. The overall 5-year survival rate was 43%.

Influencing factors associated with lymph node status in patients with cutaneous melanoma: An Asian population study

BACKGROUND

Sentinel lymph node (SLN) status is the predominant prognostic factor in patients diagnosed with clinically localized melanoma. The significance of completion lymph node dissection in patients with SLN metastasis is debatable. Not many studies have been conducted on acrallentiginous melanoma (ALM). This study aimed to characterize the prognostic factors of nodal positive ALM and confirm whether ALM patients can undergo the same treatment strategy as non-ALM patients in the Asian population.

METHODS

This is a retrospective review of patients who underwent surgery for cutaneous melanoma (CM) at Taipei Veterans General Hospital between January 1993 and December 2019. We investigated the risk factors for lymph node status. The association between clinicopathological factors and lymph node status of ALM and non-ALM patients was analyzed. Outcomes of completion lymph node dissection (CLND) performed following sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) in the CM and ALM groups were compared.

RESULTS

A total of 197 patients were included in this study. ALM was the most common histological subtype, accounting for 66.5% of all the cases. Patients in the CM and ALM subgroups with metastatic SLN ( p = 0.012) or lymph nodes ( p < 0.001 and p = 0.001) exhibited higher mortality rate. Multivariate analysis showed that patients with clinical presentation of T4 category tumor ( p = 0.012) and lymphovascular invasion ( p = 0.012) had a significantly higher risk of positive lymph nodes. The overall survival of patients with lymph nodes metastasis was not associated with the performance of CLND.

CONCLUSION

Patients in the CM or ALM subgroups with metastatic SLNs or lymph nodes exhibited significantly poorer overall survival. Advanced Breslow thickness and lymphovascular invasion were independent predictive factors for CM and ALM patients with positive lymph node status. There was no significant difference in survival between CM and ALM patients following SLNB, regardless of CLND being performed.

The prognostic significance of non-sentinel lymph node metastasis in cutaneous and acral melanoma patients-A multicenter retrospective study

Background

Whether non‐sentinel lymph node (SLN)‐positive melanoma patients can benefit from completion lymph node dissection (CLND) is still unclear. The current study was performed to identify the prognostic role of non‐SLN status in SLN‐positive melanoma and to investigate the predictive factors of non‐SLN metastasis in acral and cutaneous melanoma patients.

Methods

The records of 328 SLN‐positive melanoma patients who underwent radical surgery at four cancer centers from September 2009 to August 2017 were reviewed. Clinicopathological data including age, gender, Clark level, Breslow index, ulceration, the number of positive SLNs, non‐SLN status, and adjuvant therapy were included for survival analyses. Patients were followed up until death or June 30, 2019. Multivariable logistic regression modeling was performed to identify factors associated with non‐SLN positivity. Log‐rank analysis and Cox regression analysis were used to identify the prognostic factors for disease‐free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS).

Results

Among all enrolled patients, 220 (67.1%) had acral melanoma and 108 (32.9%) had cutaneous melanoma. The 5‐year DFS and OS rate of the entire cohort was 31.5% and 54.1%, respectively. More than 1 positive SLNs were found in 123 (37.5%) patients. Positive non‐SLNs were found in 99 (30.2%) patients. Patients with positive non‐SLNs had significantly worse DFS and OS (log‐rank P < 0.001). Non‐SLN status (P = 0.003), number of positive SLNs (P = 0.016), and adjuvant therapy (P = 0.025) were independent prognostic factors for DFS, while non‐SLN status (P = 0.002), the Breslow index (P = 0.027), Clark level (P = 0.006), ulceration (P = 0.004), number of positive SLNs (P = 0.001), and adjuvant therapy (P = 0.007) were independent prognostic factors for OS. The Breslow index (P = 0.020), Clark level (P = 0.012), and number of positive SLNs (P = 0.031) were independently related to positive non‐SLNs and could be used to develop more personalized surgical strategy.

Conclusions

Non‐SLN‐positive melanoma patients had worse DFS and OS even after immediate CLND than those with non‐SLN‐negative melanoma. The Breslow index, Clark level, and number of positive SLNs were independent predictive factors for non‐SLN status.