Second primary acute lymphoblastic leukemia in adults: a SEER analysis of incidence and outcomes

A guide to large data sets for population-based cancer research: Strengths, limitations, and pitfalls

With the proliferation of cancer research based on large databases, misalignment of research questions and data set capabilities is inevitable. Nationally maintained databases are appealing to cancer researchers because of the ease of access to large amounts of patient data available for analysis and risk estimation. Data sets that are commonly used in cancer research include the National Cancer Database, the SEER (Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results) program of the National Cancer Institute, the SEER-Medicare database, the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program, and the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project databases, among others. Each data set has pros and cons with respect to variable availability and the ability to analyze cancer-specific outcomes. It is critical for researchers to understand the strengths and limitations of each database. Changing variable definitions, the length of postoperative data collection, and the availability of patient-reported outcomes or social determinants of health data are examples of factors that researchers must consider when selecting a data set for research purposes. For the current review, the authors summarized the advantages and disadvantages of various national data sets for cohort studies in cancer populations.

Management of ALL in adults: 2024 ELN recommendations from a European expert panel

ABSTRACT

Experts from the European Leukemia Net (ELN) working group for adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia have identified an unmet need for guidance regarding management of adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) from diagnosis to aftercare. The group has previously summarized their recommendations regarding diagnostic approaches, prognostic factors, and assessment of ALL. The current recommendation summarizes clinical management. It covers treatment approaches, including the use of new immunotherapies, application of minimal residual disease for treatment decisions, management of specific subgroups, and challenging treatment situations as well as late effects and supportive care. The recommendation provides guidance for physicians caring for adult patients with ALL which has to be complemented by regional expertise preferably provided by national academic study groups.

Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation is equally effective in secondary acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) compared to de-novo ALL-a report from the EBMT registry

Secondary acute lymphoblastic leukemia (s-ALL) comprises up to 10% of ALL patients. However, data regarding s-ALL outcomes is limited. To answer what is the role of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) in s-ALL, a matched-pair analysis in a 1:2 ratio was conducted to compare outcomes between s-ALL and de novo ALL (dn-ALL) patients reported between 2000-2021 to the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation registry. Among 9720 ALL patients, 351 (3.6%) were s-ALL, of which 80 were in first complete remission (CR1) with a known precedent primary diagnosis 58.8% solid tumor (ST), 41.2% hematological diseases (HD). The estimated 2-year relapse incidence (RI) was 19.1% (95%CI: 11-28.9), leukemia-free survival (LFS) 52.1% (95%CI: 39.6-63.2), non-relapse mortality (NRM) 28.8% (95%CI: 18.4-40), GvHD-free, relapse-free survival (GRFS) 39.4% (95%CI: 27.8-50.7), and overall survival (OS) 60.8% (95%CI: 47.9-71.4), and did not differ between ST and HD patients. In a matched-pair analysis, there was no difference in RI, GRFS, NRM, LFS, or OS between s-ALL and dn-ALL except for a higher incidence of chronic GvHD (51.9% vs. 31.4%) in s-ALL. To conclude, patients with s-ALL who received HCT in CR1 have comparable outcomes to patients with dn-ALL.

'Secondary' acute lymphoblastic/lymphocytic leukemia - done playing second fiddle?

Acute lymphoblastic/lymphocytic leukemia (ALL) occurring post-cancer diagnosis (secondary ALL - sALL) is increasingly recognized as a discrete entity, constituting up to as much as 5-10% of all new ALL diagnoses, and carrying its own biologic, prognostic and therapeutic significance. In this review, we will outline the history and current state of research into sALL. We will explore the evidence for differences underlining its existence as a distinct subgroup, as well as examining what might be driving such differences etiologically, including prior chemotherapy. We will examine these distinctions on population-, chromosomal-, and molecular-levels, and we will consider whether they translate to differences in clinical outcome, and whether they do - or should - warrant differences in treatment selection.

Primary blastic plasmacytoid dendritic cell neoplasm: a US population-based study

Background

Blastic plasmacytoid dendritic cell neoplasm (BPDCN) is a rare and poorly understood hematopoietic malignancy. This study aimed to investigate the clinical characteristics and prognostic factors in patients with primary BPDCN.

Methods

Patients diagnosed with primary BPDCN from 2001 to 2019 were extracted from the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database. Survival outcome was analysed with Kaplan-Meier method. Prognostic factors were evaluated based on the univariate and multivariate accelerated failure time (AFT) regression analysis.

Results

A total of 340 primary BPDCN patients were included in this study. The average age was 53.7 ± 19.4 years, with 71.5% being male. The mostly affected sites were lymph nodes (31.8%). Most patients (82.1%) received chemotherapy, while 14.7% received radiation therapy. For all the patients, the 1-year, 3-year, 5-year, and 10-year overall survival (OS) were 68.7%, 49.8%, 43.9%, and 39.2%, respectively, and the corresponding disease-specific survival (DSS) were 73.6%, 56.0%, 50.2%, and 48.1%, respectively. Univariate AFT analysis showed that older age, marital status of divorced, widowed and separated at diagnosis, primary BPDCN only, treatment delay for 3-6 months and without radiation therapy were significantly associated with poor prognosis of primary BPDCN patients. But multivariate AFT analysis indicated that older age was independently associated with worse survival, while second primary malignancies (SPMs) and radiation therapy were independently associated with extended survival.

Conclusions

Primary BPDCN is a rare disease with poor prognosis. Advanced age was linked independently to poorer survival, while SPMs and radiation therapy were linked independently to prolonged survival.

The feasibility of PETHEMA ALL-96 regimen on treatment of patients with acute lymphoid leukemia

Background

Asparaginase-based treatment regimen for acute lymphocytic leukemia (ALL) is considered as feasible, but there is still a lack of data. In this study, considering the results of other regimen that were not optimum in previous studies. Here, we aimed to investigate the feasibility of PETHEMA ALL-96 treatment regimen.

Materials and Methods

This is a retrospective feasibility study that was performed in 2019-2021 on 13 patients diagnosed with B-cell ALL. Patients were treated by PETHEMA ALL-96 regimen during induction, consolidation, reinduction, and maintenance phases. Patients were followed for 2 years after initiation of PETHEMA ALL-96 regimen for disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) of all patients were evaluated after 2 years.

Results

Data of 11 patients were analyzed. Within 28 days after treatments, all patients (100%) had no blasts in the bone marrow that was considered as complete remission (CR). The CR rate was 100% within 6 months and 12 months and 81.8% within 2 years after the treatments. Evaluation of OS, CR, and DFS regarding 6, 12, and 24 months showed 100% for all items after 6 and 12 months. After 24 months, the CR was 90.9%, the OS was 81.8% and the DFS was 90.9%. None of the patients died during the induction phase and during the 12 months study. No side effects were observed.

Conclusion

The PETHEMA ALL-96 had high feasibility and survival rates with no side effects during the study course. It is believed that PETHEMA ALL-96 regimen has beneficial outcomes in young patients with ALL.

Risk of second primary neoplasms of the central nervous system

Purpose

Second primary (SP) neoplasms of the central nervous system (CNS) among cancer survivors are devastating but poorly understood processes. The absolute risk, or true incidence, of developing an SP CNS tumor among cancer survivors is not well characterized.

Methods and Materials

Patients diagnosed with cancer between 1975 and 2016 were queried using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program. Cumulative incidence rates (CIRs) were estimated using competitive risk analysis. The effects of covariates were assessed using multivariate competitive risk regression.

Results

More than 3.8 million patient records were extracted. The absolute risk of developing an SP CNS neoplasm at 25 years was highest among long-term survivors of CNS cancers (CIR, 6.6%). Cranial radiation increased the incidence of SP tumors in pediatric patients (25-year CIR, 5.7% vs 1.1%; P = .0012) but not adults (25-year CIR, 5.8% vs 5.0%; P = .66). Multivariate cumulative risk regression identified radiation among pediatric patients as the greatest risk for an increased CIR (subdistribution hazard ratio, 2.50; 95% CI, 1.86-3.38; P = 2e-9). Meningiomas (42.9% vs 24.1%; P = 2e-7) and glioblastomas (20.5% vs 14.5%; P = .046) represented a greater proportion of the SP CNS tumors in those who received cranial irradiation. The median age of an SP diagnosis was decreased among those who received prior radiation (41 years [interquartile range (IQR), 30-65 years] vs 49 years [IQR, 30-65 years]; P = 7e-5).

Conclusions

The risk of developing a second primary CNS neoplasm is elevated in patients with a prior CNS cancer independent of treatment history. The association between cranial radiation therapy and risk for subsequent cancers may be limited to the pediatric population.

Comparative study of therapy-related and de novo adult b-cell acute lymphoblastic leukaemia

We report a comparative analysis of patients with therapy‐related acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (tr‐ALL) vs de novo ALL. We identified 331 patients with B‐ALL; 69 (21%) were classified as tr‐ALL. The most common prior malignancies were breast (23·2%) and plasma cell disorders (20·3%). Patients with tr‐ALL were older (median 63·2 vs. 46·2 years, P < 0.001), more often female (66·7% vs. 43·5%, P < 0·001), and more likely to have hypodiploid cytogenetics (18·8% vs. 5·0%, P < 0·001). In multivariable analysis, patients with tr‐ALL were less likely to achieve complete remission [odds ratio (OR) = 0·16, P < 0·001] and more likely to be minimal residual disease‐positive (OR = 4·86, P = 0·01) but had similar OS after diagnosis and allo‐haematopoietic cell transplantation.

Synchronous B-Cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia and Serous Ovarian Carcinoma: A Case Report

Adult patients with B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) have higher rates of antecedent and subsequent malignancies. However, synchronous identification of ALL and ovarian cancer is exceedingly rare. We report the unique case of a 65-year-old woman with synchronous B-cell ALL and low-grade serous ovarian carcinoma diagnosed after surgical intervention for a small bowel obstruction. Treatment with inotuzumab ozogamicin followed by adnexal mass resection and postoperative letrozole was successful in achieving complete remission for both her leukemia and ovarian cancer.

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation overcomes the poor prognosis in MLL-rearranged solid tumor therapy related-acute myeloid leukemia

MLL rearrangement is very common in solid tumor therapy-related acute myeloid leukemia (t-AML). To investigated the prognosis of solid tumor MLL t-AML, 157 patients were divided into 3 groups: non-MLL t-AML (n=41), MLL t-AML (n=18) and MLL de novo AML (n=98). Of the 150 patients underwent anti-leukemia therapy, the complete remission (CR) was similar in MLL t-AML, non-MLL t-AML and MLL de novo AML (P=0.251). 3-years overall survival (OS) was 37.5%, 21.5% and 20.4% (P=0.046), and leukemia-free survival (LFS) was 28.0%, 32.2% and 22.7% (P=0.031), and the incidence of relapse was 30.0%, 50.4% and 53.5% (P=0.382), respectively, in the three groups. Multivariate analysis revealed that MLL t-AML was a risk factor while allo-HSCT was a protective factor for OS, LFS, and relapse (P<0.001, P<0.001 and P=0.005) (P=0.002, P<0.001 and P<0.001, respectively). The 3-years OS was 0%, 17.9% and 2.3% (P=0.038), and LFS was 0%, 23.1% and 3.3% (P=0.017), and relapse was 100%, 53.1% and 74.4% (P=0.001), respectively, among three groups in patients undergoing chemotherapy alone, while OS was 64.3%, 52.7% and 40.7% (P=0.713), LFS was 60.0%, 48.8% and 37.0% (P=0.934), and relapse was 25.0%, 47.4% and 47.5% (P=0.872), respectively, among these groups in patients undergoing allo-HSCT. Intriguingly, MLL t-AML was no longer risk factor for relapse and LFS (P=0.882 and P=0.484, respectively), and it became a favorable factor for OS (P=0.011) in patients undergoing allo-HSCT. In conclusion, MLL t-AML had poor prognosis compared with non-MLL t-AML and MLL de novo AML, but allo-HSCT might overcome the poor prognosis of MLL t-AML.

Significant current epidemiological trend: Haematological malignancies as subsequent primary tumours in cancer patients

BACKGROUND

Numbers of patients who develop subsequent primary tumours have markedly increased recently. This study aimed to carry out a comprehensive analysis documenting the risk of incidence of subsequent haematological malignancies.

METHODS

The Czech National Cancer Registry was the main data source, containing records of 126,822 haematological malignancies diagnosed in the period 1977-2016. Subsequent haematological malignancies were identified according to IACR rules. Joinpoint regression was employed to assess the time trends. The risk of development of subsequent haematological malignancy was evaluated by the standardised incidence ratio. The Kaplan-Meier curves were used to assess the differences in survival.

RESULTS

Age-standardised incidence of subsequent haematological malignancies increased from 0.5 in 1977 to 9.1 in 2016. In 1992, there was a significant change in the trend: a sharp increase by 7.7 % annually was revealed thereafter. The risk of development of a haematological malignancy was approximately 1.5 times higher in persons with history of any cancer than in the general Czech population. Patients with haematological malignancies - mainly myelodysplastic syndromes, polycythaemia vera and non-Hodgkin lymphoma - were shown to be at the highest risk of developing a subsequent haematological malignancy. While the median survival following a first haematological malignancy was 2.3 years, it was only 1.1 years for subsequent haematological malignancies (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study identified the highest-risk diagnoses in terms of development of subsequent haematological malignancy. The results might be useful to set up correctly follow-up procedures from which cancer patients could benefit.

The impact of a prior malignancy on outcomes in gastric cancer patients

Background

The number of cancer survivors has increased rapidly, and there is a higher risk of developing a second cancer. Whether a prior malignancy could affect survival outcomes is unknown. We aimed to investigate the clinical characteristics and prognostic outcomes of prior malignancies in patients with gastric cancer.

Methods

Patient data were extracted from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. We used the Kaplan–Meier method, competing risk models, and Cox regression models to evaluate the impact of prior malignancy on survival outcomes.

Results

Among 71,809 patients with primary gastric cancer, 6667 (9.3%) patients had a pre‐existing cancer. Prostate (31.86%), breast (14.34%), and colon and rectum (10.32%) cancer were the most common types. A significant difference was observed in the overall survival rates between patients with and without prior cancer (log‐rank=139.73, p < 0.001). In the subgroup analysis, patients with prostate, uterine corpus, lung and bronchus, colon and rectum, esophagus, urinary bladder, leukemia, brain and other nervous system, oral cavity and pharynx, and breast cancer faced inferior survival than those without prior cancer.

Conclusions

A history of prior cancer was associated with worse overall survival in patients with gastric cancer, and the effects varied by different initial cancer types. The exclusion and inclusion of patients who had previous malignancies should be reconsidered according to the specific malignancy types.

Impact of Novel Targeted Therapies and Cytogenetic Risk Groups on Outcome After Allogeneic Transplantation for Adult ALL

Novel high-risk groups have recently been identified in adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), including Philadelphia-like, therapy-related, and measurable residual disease after induction therapy. Furthermore, modern targeted therapies have recently been incorporated into ALL management; rituximab for CD20-positive and blinatumomab for measurable residual disease after induction therapy or relapsed or refractory disease. Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) is recommended as consolidation therapy for high-risk ALL; however, its relative benefit for these high-risk groups and after novel therapies is unclear. We performed an analysis of posttransplantation outcomes in a cohort of 261 consecutive patients who underwent allo-HCT for ALL at the 3-site Mayo Clinic Cancer Center (January 1, 2008-December 31, 2018). With a median (range) follow-up of 22.4 months (0.5-135.0), the 100-day and 5-year cumulative incidences of nonrelapse mortality rates were 6.5% and 26.7%, respectively. The 5-year cumulative incidences of relapse and death were 22.6% and 46.2%, respectively. The 1-year estimate of the composite endpoint of graft-versus-host disease/relapse-free survival was 39.3%. We observed no associations of novel high-risk groups or modern targeted therapies with overall survival, nonrelapse mortality, or relapse in multivariable analysis. An increased risk of relapse was observed with T-ALL (hazard ratio, 2.16; 95% confidence interval, 1.14-4.09; P = .02) and hypodiploidy/near-triploidy (hazard ratio, 2.84; 95% confidence interval, 1.06-7.62; P = .04). Our analysis suggests that novel high-risk groups derive a similar benefit from allo-HCT as traditional high-risk adult ALL and that novel targeted therapies do not seem to independently predict for posttransplantation outcomes. It also calls for further exploration of maintenance strategies after Allo-HCT to prevent relapse in high-risk subgroups.

Comparison of Overall Survival Between De Novo and Secondary Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia Patients of Different Ages

PURPOSE

To compare the overall survival (OS) between de novo and secondary acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) patients in different age groups after chemotherapy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Data from 8305 ALL patients undergoing chemotherapy from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database during 1975 to 2015 were included in this study, of which 7454 (80.11%) were in the de novo ALL group, and 851 (19.89%) were in the secondary ALL (sALL) group. Propensity matching was used before comparison of OS between the two groups.

RESULTS

Female ALL patients had a lower risk of death than male (hazard ratio [HR], 0.93; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.88-0.98; P < .01). The mortality of black patients was higher than in white patients (HR, 1.29; 95% CI, 1.18-1.42; P < .001). Patients aged 45-75 years (HR, 1.82; 95% CI, 1.72-1.94; P < .001) and ≥ 75 years (HR, 3.85; 95% CI, 3.52-4.23; P < .001) had a higher risk of death. Separated/divorced (HR, 1.21; 95% CI, 1.10-1.34; P < .001) and widowed (HR, 1.35; 95% CI, 1.21-1.51; P < .001) patients had a higher risk of death than single patients. sALL patients had a higher risk of death than de novo ALL patients (HR, 1.21; 95% CI, 1.12-1.30; P < .001). The mean age of the de novo ALL group was lower than in the sALL group (51.05 vs. 60.25; P < .001) after the propensity score was matched, and the 1-, 2-, 3-, 4-, and 5-year OS of the de novo ALL group were higher than that of the sALL group aged 18-75 years (P < .001).

CONCLUSION

The survival rate of ALL decreased with increased age. Patients with sALL had poorer OS than de novo patients aged 18-75 years.

Outcomes of therapy-related acute lymphoblastic leukemia in adults after allogeneic stem cell transplantation

INTRODUCTION

Therapy-related acute lymphoblastic leukemia (t-ALL) is an increasingly recognized subset of therapy-related acute leukemia. There are limited data on the role of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) in t-ALL. Recent reports suggest comparable outcomes of t-ALL with de novo ALL after HSCT.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed all patients of t-ALL who underwent HSCT at our center. Patients were analyzed for prior malignancy, therapy, time to diagnosis of t-ALL, clinical, laboratory characteristics, transplant details, relapse-free survival (RFS), and overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

Eighteen patients (M:F ratio 1:1; Median age 44 years) underwent HSCT for t-ALL. Median latent period from primary malignancy to t-ALL was 44.8 months. 11q23 rearrangement and t(9;22) were present in 33.3% and 22.2% patients, respectively. Stem cell donors were matched related, matched unrelated, and haploidentical in 27.8% (n = 5), 55.6% (n = 10), and 16.7% (n = 3) patients, respectively. Five patients died before D+ 100 (27.8%). Estimated 2-year RFS and OS were 47.1% and 51.8%, respectively. We did not find any pretransplant and post-transplant risk factors that were predictive of improved OS or RFS after multivariate analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

Allogeneic HSCT outcomes in t-ALL were comparable to HSCT outcomes in de novo ALL. Multicenter studies with more patients and longer follow-up may provide factors affecting outcome and survival.

Therapy-related acute lymphoblastic leukemia is a distinct entity with adverse genetic features and clinical outcomes

Patients with therapy-related acute lymphoblastic leukemia (t-ALL) represent a small subset of acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) patients who received genotoxic therapy (ie, chemotherapy or radiation) for a prior malignancy. These patients should be distinguished from patients with de novo ALL (dn-ALL) and ALL patients who have a history of prior malignancy but have not received cytotoxic therapies in the past (acute lymphoblastic leukemia with prior malignancy [pm-ALL]). We report a retrospective multi-institutional study of patients with t-ALL (n = 116), dn-ALL (n = 100), and pm-ALL (n = 20) to investigate the impact of prior cytotoxic therapies on clinical outcomes. Compared with patients with pm-ALL, t-ALL patients had a significantly shorter interval between the first malignancy and ALL diagnosis and a higher frequency of poor-risk cytogenetic features, including KMT2A rearrangements and myelodysplastic syndrome-like abnormalities (eg, monosomal karyotype). We observed a variety of mutations among t-ALL patients, with the majority of patients exhibiting mutations that were more common with myeloid malignancies (eg, DNMT3A, RUNX1, ASXL1), whereas others had ALL-type mutations (eg, CDKN2A, IKZF1). Median overall survival was significantly shorter in the t-ALL cohort compared with patients with dn-ALL or pm-ALL. Patients who were eligible for hematopoietic cell transplantation had improved long-term survival. Collectively, our results support t-ALL as a distinct entity based on its biologic and clinical features.

Common B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukaemia in a 70-year-old woman presenting 2 years after carboplatin-taxane radiotherapy for endometrial cancer

Therapy-related acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (t-ALL) is a poorly defined entity and is not featured in the World Health Organization classification as a distinct clinical entity from acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL), thus differing from therapy-related acute myeloid leukaemia and myelodysplasia. We present a case of t-ALL occurring 18 months after treatment for metastatic endometrial cancer with a regimen of carboplatin, paclitaxel and radiotherapy. The patient presented with severe pancytopenia and diagnosed with common-B ALL, and the cytogenetic analysis showed a previously unreported deletion in chromosome 19 (q13.1) in 100% of the blast cells. The patient declined further therapy and died 1 month later. This rare but serious side effect of chemo-radiotherapy should be considered when deciding on treatment options for gynaecological cancers.

Trends in the risk of second primary malignancies among survivors of chronic lymphocytic leukemia

With improving survivorship in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), the risk of second primary malignancies (SPMs) has not been systematically addressed. Differences in risk for SPMs among CLL survivors from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database (1973–2015) were compared to risk of individual malignancies expected in the general population. In ~270,000 person-year follow-up, 6487 new SPMs were diagnosed with a standardized incidence ratio (SIR) of 1.2 (95% CI:1.17–1.23). The higher risk was for both solid (SIR 1.15; 95% CI:1.12–1.18) and hematological malignancies (SIR 1.61; 95% CI:1.5–1.73). The highest risk for SPMs was noted between 2 and 5 months after CLL diagnosis (SIR 1.57; 95% CI:1.41–1.74) and for CLL patients between 50- and 79-years-old. There was a significant increase in SPMs in years 2003–2015 (SIR 1.36; 95% CI:1.3–1.42) as compared to 1973–1982 (SIR 1.19; 95% CI:1.12–1.26). The risk of SPMs was higher in CLL patients who had received prior chemotherapy (SIR 1.38 95% CI:1.31–1.44) as compared to those untreated/treatment status unknown (SIR 1.16, 95% CI:1.13–1.19, p < 0.001). In a multivariate analysis, the hazard of developing SPMs was higher among men, post-chemotherapy, recent years of diagnosis, advanced age, and non-Whites. Active survivorship plans and long-term surveillance for SPMs is crucial for improved outcomes of patients with a history of CLL.

Elderly acute lymphoblastic leukemia: a Mayo Clinic study of 124 patients

Poor outcomes in elderly acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) are well recognized, but the contributors are ill-defined. We characterized 124 patients ≥60 years old at our institution. The majority (n = 102, 82%) were treated with intensive chemotherapy. Of these, 8/102 (8%) died within the first 100 days; 92/102 (90%) achieved complete remission (CR/CRi). Only 31/124 (25%) patients underwent allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. The median overall survival (OS) for the entire cohort was 19.8 months. In a multivariate analysis, ECOG performance status ≥2, high white blood cell count, and high lactate dehydrogenase (at time of diagnosis) negatively influenced OS (p<.01). In a subgroup analysis of the intensive treatment group, BCR-ABL1+ patients had markedly better OS (hazard ratio 0.3, 95% CI 0.1-0.7; p<.01). In summary, despite few early deaths and a high CR/CRi rate, elderly ALL continues to have a poor prognosis, underscoring the need for more effective therapies.

Secondary acute lymphoblastic leukemia, a retrospective analysis from Washington University and meta-analysis of published data

Secondary acute lymphoblastic leukemia (s-ALL) is rare and poorly defined and data regarding outcomes post-transplant are lacking. Here, we report a detailed analysis of s-ALL at our Institution. Among 211 eligible patients with ALL from 2006 to 2017, 30 (14%) were defined as s-ALL and the remaining as primary ALL (p-ALL). s-ALL patients were older and had higher incidence of adverse risk factors. Overall response (OR) after induction was not different between s-ALL and p-ALL (79% versus 90% respectively, p = 0.106). S-ALL group had a higher risk of relapse (RFS) and death (RFS HR = 1.93, 95% CI 1.2-3.12, p = 0.007. OS HR: =1.95, 95% CI 1.18-3.23, p = 0.01). In multivariate analysis, the adverse effect of s-ALL on RFS and OS was no longer significant, however a pooled meta-analysis of our and published data indicated that s-ALL is an independent risk factor for lower OS (HR: 1.30, 95% CI: 1.11-1.52, p < 0.01). Myeloablative allogeneic transplantation in s-ALL was associated with lower rates of relapse and higher transplant related mortality without improvement in OS. These data indicate that s-ALL status should be considered for risk- stratification of newly diagnosed ALL. The optimal conditioning regimen for s-ALL patients undergoing allogeneic stem cell transplantation needs to be evaluated in a larger study.

Reduced Intensity Conditioning Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation for Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia; Current Evidence, and Improving Outcomes Going Forward

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Outcomes for older adults with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) remain poor, and allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) remains a potentially curative modality. However, benefits are offset by high rates of non-relapse mortality (NRM) in patients undergoing myeloablative conditioning (MAC) regimens. Reduced intensity conditioning (RIC) regimens can extend this therapy to adults who are unfit for MAC, although at the cost of higher relapse rates. In this review, we discuss evidence to support the usage of RIC regimens, controversies, and potential strategies to improve transplant outcomes going forward.

RECENT FINDINGS

Several novel therapies have recently been approved for the treatment of relapsed ALL and may play an important role in bridging adults with residual disease to RIC transplant. Assessing response to initial therapy via minimal residual disease (MRD) monitoring may determine which patients will derive the most benefit from allogeneic HSCT. Reduced intensity allogeneic HSCT remains a potentially curative therapy that can be offered to older adults however challenges remain. Going forward, MRD testing and novel therapies may help better select which patients should proceed to transplant and assist in getting those patients to transplant with optimally controlled disease.

Therapy-related acute lymphoblastic leukemia has distinct clinical and cytogenetic features compared to de novo acute lymphoblastic leukemia, but outcomes are comparable in transplanted patients

Therapy-related acute lymphoblastic leukemia remains poorly defined due to a lack of large data sets recognizing the defining characteristics of this entity. We reviewed all consecutive cases of adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia treated at our institution between 2000 and 2017 and identified therapy-related cases - defined as acute lymphoblastic leukemia preceded by prior exposure to cytotoxic chemotherapy and/or radiation. Of 1022 patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia, 93 (9.1%) were classified as therapy-related. The median latency for therapy-related acute lymphoblastic leukemia onset was 6.8 years from original diagnosis, and this was shorter for patients carrying the MLL gene rearrangement compared to those with other cytogenetics. When compared to de novo acute lymphoblastic leukemia, therapy-related patients were older (P<0.01), more often female (P<0.01), and had more MLL gene rearrangement (P<0.0001) and chromosomes 5/7 aberrations (P=0.02). Although therapy-related acute lymphoblastic leukemia was associated with inferior 2-year overall survival compared to de novo cases (46.0% vs 68.1%, P=0.001), prior exposure to cytotoxic therapy (therapy-related) did not independently impact survival in multivariate analysis (HR=1.32; 95% CI: 0.97-1.80, P=0.08). There was no survival difference (2-year = 53.4% vs 58.9%, P=0.68) between the two groups in patients who received allogenic hematopoietic cell transplantation. In conclusion, therapy-related acute lymphoblastic leukemia represents a significant proportion of adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia diagnoses, and a subset of cases carry clinical and cytogenetic abnormalities similar to therapy-related myeloid neoplasms. Although survival of therapy-related acute lymphoblastic leukemia was inferior to de novo cases, allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation outcomes were comparable for the two entities.