Stereotactic body radiation therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma: Practice patterns, dose selection and factors impacting survival

Microinvasion in hepatocellular carcinoma: predictive factor and application for definition of clinical target volume for radiotherapy

BACKGROUND

To investigate the correlation between microinvasion and various features of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), and to clarify the microinvasion distance from visible HCC lesions to subclinical lesions, so as to provide clinical basis for the expandable boundary of clinical target volume (CTV) from gross tumor volume (GTV) in the radiotherapy of HCC.

METHODS

HCC patients underwent hepatectomy of liver cancer in our hospital between July 2019 and November 2021 were enrolled. Data on various features and tumor microinvasion distance were collected. The distribution characteristics of microinvasion distance were analyzed to investigate its potential correlation with various features. Tumor size compared between radiographic and pathologic samples was analyzed to clarify the application of pathologic microinvasion to identify subclinical lesions of radiographic imaging.

RESULTS

The average microinvasion distance was 0.6 mm, with 95% patients exhibiting microinvasion distance less than 3.0 mm, and the maximum microinvasion distance was 4.0 mm. A significant correlation was found between microinvasion and liver cirrhosis (P = 0.036), serum albumin level (P = 0.049). Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that HCC patients with cirrhosis had a significantly lower risk of microinvasion (OR = 0.09, 95%CI = 0.02 ~ 0.50, P = 0.006). Tumor size was overestimated by 1.6 mm (95%CI=-12.8 ~ 16.0 mm) on radiographic size compared to pathologic size, with a mean %Δsize of 2.96% (95%CI=-0.57%~6.50%). The %Δsize ranged from - 29.03% to 34.78%.

CONCLUSIONS

CTV expanding by 5.4 mm from radiographic GTV could include all pathologic microinvasive lesions in the radiotherapy of HCC. Liver cirrhosis was correlated with microinvasion and were independent predictive factor of microinvasion in HCC.

Clinical and Dosimetric Results of Proton or Photon Radiation Therapy for Large (>5 cm) Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Retrospective Analysis

PURPOSE

Our purpose was to report the clinical and dosimetric attributes of patients with large unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) undergoing proton or photon radiation therapy.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

We retrospectively analyzed the outcomes and dosimetric indices of 159 patients with >5 cm nonmetastatic HCC who underwent definitive radiation therapy using either protons (N = 105) or photons (N = 54) between 2014 and 2018. Additional photon plans were performed in the 105 proton-treated patients using the same dose prescription criteria for intragroup dosimetric comparison.

RESULTS

After a median follow-up of 47 months, patients with biologically effective dose (BED10) ≥ 75 Gy exhibited significantly better local control (LC; 2-year: 85.6% vs 20.5%; P < .001), progression-free survival (PFS; median, 7.4 vs 3.2 months; P < .001), and overall survival (OS; median, 18.1 vs 7.3 months; P < .001) compared with those with BED10 < 75 Gy. Notably, proton-treated patients had a significantly higher BED10 (96 vs 67 Gy; P < .001) and improved LC (2-year: 88.5% vs 33.8%; P < .001), PFS (median, 7.4 vs 3.3 months; P = .001), and OS (median, 18.9 vs 8.3 months; P < .001) than those undergoing photon radiation therapy. Furthermore, patients treated with protons had significantly lower V1 of the liver (P < .001), mean upper gastrointestinal tract dose (P < .001), and mean splenic dose (P < .001), with significantly decreased incidences of radiation-induced liver disease (P = .007), grade ≥3 upper gastrointestinal bleeding (P = .001), and grade ≥3 lymphopenia (P = .003). On multivariate analysis, proton radiation therapy consistently correlated with superior LC (P < .001), PFS (P < .001), and OS (P < .001). In intragroup dosimetric comparison, photon plans demonstrated significantly higher mean liver dose (P < .001) compared with actually delivered proton treatments, and 72 (69%) of them had mean liver dose exceeding 28 Gy, which necessitated target dose de-escalation.

CONCLUSIONS

In the context of large HCC radiation therapy, a higher target BED10 was associated with improved outcomes. Notably, proton therapy has demonstrated the capability to deliver ablative doses while also being accompanied by fewer instances of severe toxicity.

Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Meta-Analysis and International Stereotactic Radiosurgery Society Practice Guidelines

This systematic review and meta-analysis reports on outcomes and hepatic toxicity rates after stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for liver-confined hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and presents consensus guidelines regarding appropriate patient management. Using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systemic Review and Meta-Analyses guidelines, a systematic review was performed from articles reporting outcomes at ≥5 years published before October 2022 from the Embase, MEDLINE, Cochrane, and Scopus databases with the following search terms: ("stereotactic body radiotherapy" OR "SBRT" OR "SABR" OR "stereotactic ablative radiotherapy") AND ("hepatocellular carcinoma" OR "HCC"). An aggregated data meta-analysis was conducted to assess overall survival (OS) and local control (LC) using weighted random effects models. In addition, individual patient data analyses incorporating data from 6 institutions were conducted as their own subgroup analyses. Seventeen observational studies, comprising 1889 patients with HCC treated with ≤9 SBRT fractions, between 2003 and 2019, were included in the aggregated data meta-analysis. The 3- and 5-year OS rates after SBRT were 57% (95% confidence interval [CI], 47%-66%) and 40% (95% CI, 29%-51%), respectively. The 3- and 5-year LC rates after SBRT were 84% (95% CI, 77%-90%) and 82% (95% CI, 74%-88%), respectively. Tumor size was the only prognostic factor for LC. Tumor size and region were significantly associated with OS. Five-year LC and OS rates of 79% (95% CI, 0.74-0.84) and 25% (95% CI, 0.20-0.30), respectively, were observed in the individual patient data analyses. Factors prognostic for improved OS were tumor size <3 cm, Eastern region, Child-Pugh score ≤B7, and the Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer stage of 0 and A. The incidence of severe hepatic toxicity varied according to the criteria applied. SBRT is an effective treatment modality for patients with HCC with mature follow-up. Clinical practice guidelines were developed on behalf of the International Stereotactic Radiosurgery Society (ISRS).

Definitive Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy in Early-Stage Solitary Hepatocellular Carcinoma: An Australian Multi-Institutional Review of Outcomes

AIMS

Standard curative options for early-stage, solitary hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) are often unsuitable due to liver dysfunction, comorbidities and/or tumour location. Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) has shown high rates of local control in HCC; however, limited data exist in the treatment-naïve, curative-intent setting. We report the outcomes of patients with solitary early-stage HCC treated with SBRT as first-line curative-intent therapy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A multi-institutional retrospective study of treatment-naïve patients with Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer stage 0/A, solitary ≤5 cm HCC, Child-Pugh score (CPS) A liver function who underwent SBRT between 2010 and 2019 as definitive therapy. The primary end point was freedom from local progression. Secondary end points were progression-free survival, overall survival, rate of treatment-related clinical toxicities and change in CPS >1.

RESULTS

In total, 68 patients were evaluated, with a median follow-up of 20 months (range 3-58). The median age was 68 years (range 50-86); 54 (79%) were men, 62 (91%) had cirrhosis and 50 (74%) were Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group 0. The median HCC diameter was 2.5 cm (range 1.3-5) and the median prescription biologically effective dose with a tumour a/b ratio of 10 Gy (BED10) was 93 Gy (interquartile range 72-100 Gy). Two-year freedom from local progression, progression-free survival and overall survival were 94.3% (95% confidence interval 86.6-100%), 59.5% (95% confidence interval 46.3-76.4%) and 88% (95% confidence interval 79.2-97.6%), respectively. Nine patients (13.2%) experienced grade ≥2 treatment-related clinical toxicities. A rise >1 in CPS was observed in six cirrhotic patients (9.6%).

CONCLUSION

SBRT is an effective and well-tolerated option to consider in patients with solitary, early-stage HCC. Prospective, randomised comparative studies are warranted to further refine its role as a first-line curative-intent therapy.

Therapeutic Outcome of Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Small Hepatocellular Carcinoma Lesions - A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis

Surgical resection, stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) and radiofrequency ablation (RFA) have seldom been compared for small hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). We explored the treatment outcomes of SBRT for small HCC by conducting a network meta-analysis (NMA). We compared the efficacy and safety of surgical resection, RFA and SBRT for liver-confined small HCC (three or fewer lesions with a diameter ≤5 cm). The study endpoint included the odds ratios of the 1-, 3- and 5-year progression/recurrence/disease-free survival (disease progression-free survival; DPFS) and overall survival rates, as well as severe complications. Forty-five studies included 21 468 patients. In the NMA with comparable data, SBRT had comparable 1-, 3- and 5-year DPFS but significantly worse pooled long-term overall survival (3- and 5-year overall survival) than surgical resection (odds ratio 1.39, 95% confidential interval 1.3-1.89; odds ratio 1.33, 95% confidence interval 1.06-1.69, respectively). SBRT was associated with significantly better pooled 1-year DPFS compared with RFA (odds ratio 0.39, 95% confidence interval 0.15-0.97), with the remaining outcomes being comparable. SBRT had significantly less incidence of severe complications compared with surgical resection (odds ratio 0.62, 95% confidence interval 0.42-0.88) and RFA (odds ratio 0.2, 95% confidence interval 0.03-0.94). In conclusion, for small HCCs (≤5 cm) with one to three nodules, SBRT may be favourable to reduce the risks of severe complications. In terms of DPFS, SBRT may be recommended as an alternative first-line therapy for RFA and surgical resection. The results regarding overall survival should be interpreted with caution, considering the potentially uneliminated bias. There is a clear need for well-designed randomised trials to conclusively identify real differences in efficacy between these treatments, especially SBRT and surgical resection.

Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy versus Surgical Resection for Stage I/II Hepatocellular Carcinoma

SBRT is an emerging locoregional treatment modality for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Although local tumor control rates seem encouraging, large-scale survival data comparing SBRT to surgical resection are lacking. We identified patients with stage I/II HCC from the National Cancer Database amenable for potential surgical resection. Patients undergoing hepatectomy were matched by propensity score (1:2) with patients who underwent SBRT as primary treatment. A total of 3787 (91%) and 366 (9%) patients underwent surgical resection or SBRT between 2004 and 2015, respectively. After propensity matching, the 5-year overall survival was 24% (95% CI 19-30%) in the SBRT group versus 48% (95% CI 43-53%) in the surgery group (p < 0.001). The association of surgery with overall survival was consistent in all subgroups. In patients treated with SBRT, a biologic effective dose (BED) of ≥100 Gy (31%, 95% CI 22%-40%) compared with BED < 100 Gy (13%, 95% CI 8-22%) was associated with a higher 5-year overall survival rate (hazard ratio of mortality of 0.58, 95% CI 0.43-0.77; p < 0.001). Surgical resection may be associated with prolonged overall survival compared with SBRT in patients with stage I/II HCC.

Hepatic tumours and radiotherapy

We present the update of the recommendations of the French society of oncological radiotherapy on hepatic tumours. Recent technological progress led to develop the concept of focused liver radiation therapy. We must distinguish primary and secondary tumours, as the indications are restricted and must be discussed as an alternative to surgical or medical treatments. The tumour volume, its liver location close to the organs at risk determine the irradiation technique (repositioning method, total dose delivered, dose fractionation regimens). Tumour (and liver) breathing related motions should be taken into account. Strict dosimetric criteria must be observed with particular attention to the dose-volume histograms of non-tumoral liver as well as of the hollow organs, particularly in case of hypofractionated high dose radiotherapy "under stereotaxic conditions". Stereotactic body radiotherapy is being evaluated and is often preferred to radiofrequency for primary or secondary tumours (usually less than 5cm). An adaptation can be proposed, with a conformal fractionated irradiation protocol with or without intensity modulation, for hepatocellular carcinomas larger than 5cm.

Comparison of stereotactic body radiotherapy and radiofrequency ablation for hepatocellular carcinoma: Systematic review and meta-analysis of propensity score studies

AIM

Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is an emerging treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and has shown excellent local control (LC), as has radiofrequency ablation (RFA). As no randomized controlled trial has compared SBRT and RFA for HCC, data from a propensity score matched study (PSMS) are valuable. However, the results varied greatly and depended on composing factors of Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer staging (BCLC-factors) adjusted. Therefore, we undertook a systematic review and meta-analyses of the studies focusing on BCLC-factors matching.

METHODS

We systematically searched PubMed, the Cochrane database, EMBASE, and Web of Science to identify studies comparing RFA and SBRT using propensity scores. The hazard ratios (HRs) of overall survival (OS) and LC from BCLC-factor-matched and -unmatched PSMS were pooled. Heterogeneity between the data from these studies was assessed.

RESULTS

Three BCLC-factor-matched studies were identified. Stereotactic body radiotherapy led to comparable OS (HR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.74-1.08; p = 0.24; I²  = 0%; p for heterogeneity, 0.56) and significantly better LC (HR, 0.39; 95% CI, 0.30-0.51; p < 0.001; I²  = 0%; p for heterogeneity, 0.67). We also identified three additional BCLC-factor-unmatched studies (HR of OS, 1.41; 95% CI, 1.21-1.65; p < 0.0001; I²  = 0%; p for heterogeneity, 0.63). However, considerable heterogeneity was observed for HR of OS between BCLC-factor-matched and -unmatched studies (I²  = 92.6%; p for heterogeneity, 0.0002).

CONCLUSIONS

When BCLC-factors were properly adjusted, the results of the meta-analysis revealed equivalent OS and better LC for SBRT compared with RFA. Stereotactic body radiotherapy could be an alternative treatment option for HCC.

Stereotactic body radiotherapy in the management of hepatocellular carcinoma: An Australian multi-institutional patterns of practice review

INTRODUCTION

Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is an emerging, therapeutic option in the management of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). A multicentre Liver Ablative Stereotactic Radiation (LASR) database was established to provide a collaborative platform for Australian institutions to define the practice of liver SBRT for HCC. This study explores the patterns of SBRT practice amongst Australian institutions.

METHODS

This was a multi-institutional retrospective study of patients treated with SBRT for HCC at 10 institutions between January 2013 and December 2019. Patients' demographics, disease characteristics and SBRT details were evaluated.

RESULTS

Three hundred and seventeen patients were evaluated with a median age of 67 years (range, 32-90). Liver cirrhosis was present in 88.6%, baseline Child-Pugh score was A5/6 in 85.1% and B7/8 in 13.2%. Median size of HCC treated was 30 mm (range, 10-280). 63.1% had early-stage disease (Barcelona clinic liver cancer (BCLC) stage 0/A) and 36% had intermediate/advanced-stage disease (BCLC B/C). In 2013/2014, six courses of SBRT were delivered, increasing to 108 in 2019. SBRT was prescribed in five fractions for 71.3% of the cohort. The most common dose fractionation schedule was 40 Gy in five fractions (24.3%). Median biologically effective dose (BED₁₀ ) delivered was 85.5 Gy for early-stage and 60 Gy for intermediate/advanced disease, respectively. The most common prescription range was 100-120 Gy BED₁₀ (32.8%).

CONCLUSION

SBRT utilisation for HCC is increasing in Australia. There was wide variation in size of tumours and disease stages treated, and prescription patterns. Uniform reporting of clinical and dosimetric details are important in refining the role of liver SBRT.

Stereotactic body radiotherapy versus intensity-modulated radiotherapy for hepatocellular carcinoma with portal vein tumor thrombosis

BACKGROUND

It is unclear whether robotic stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is superior to intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). This study aimed to compare the long-term outcomes of SBRT with those of IMRT in HCCs with portal vein tumor thrombosis (PVTT).

METHODS

We retrospectively evaluated 287 HCC patients with PVTT who underwent radiotherapy between January 2000 and January 2017. Of them, 154 and 133 patients were treated with IMRT and SBRT, respectively. Overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), intrahepatic control (IC), and local control (LC) were evaluated in univariable and propensity-score matched analyses.

RESULTS

After matching, 102 well-paired patients were selected. There was no significant difference in the 6-, 12-, 24-, and 60-month cumulative OS (73.5, 42.9, 23.6, 7.6% vs. 72.4, 45.1, 29.8, 13.2%, p = 0.151), PFS (53.9, 29.3, 21.8, 7.5% vs. 54.5, 19.3, 12.0, 9.6%, p = 0.744), IC (61.4, 45.7, 39.0, 26.8% vs. 75.1, 45.8, 35.9, 28.7%, p = 0.144), and LC (85.2, 56.5, 52.1, 47.4% vs. 87.4, 65.2, 62.1, 62.1%, p = 0.191) between the IMRT and SBRT groups. A biologically effective dose assumed at an a/b ratio of 10 (BED₁₀) of ≥ 100 Gy was the optimal cutoff for predicting the OS, PFS, IC, and LC in the patients who received SBRT.

CONCLUSIONS

When high-precision tracking technology is available, SBRT appears to be a safe and more time-efficient treatment, achieving comparable OS, PFS, IC and LC to IMRT for local advanced HCC with PVTT. A BED₁₀ ≥ 100 Gy is recommended if tolerated by normal tissue.

Dose-Response Relationship in Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Pooled Analysis of an Asian Liver Radiation Therapy Group Study

PURPOSE

Despite the worldwide implementation of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), there is a lack of consensus guideline on prescription dose. Herein, this multinational study aimed to investigate the effects of the prescribed radiation dose on oncologic outcomes of SBRT for HCC.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

The multi-institutional retrospective cohort included 510 patients treated with SBRT between 2010 and 2016. All relevant clinical factors and factors related to SBRT were analyzed to evaluate freedom from local progression (FFLP) and overall survival (OS). Based on a biologically effective dose (BED) cutoff value of 100 Gy, 198 tumors were selected from each group in propensity score matching (PSM).

RESULTS

Baseline characteristics in the BED <100 Gy group were unfavorable (Child-Pugh class B, 19%; advanced stage, 72%; median tumor size was 4 cm) compared with the BED ≥100 Gy group. With a median follow-up of 22 (interquartile range, 9.8-37.6) months, the 2-year FFLP and OS rates were 77% and 73%, respectively. Patients treated with a BED ≥100 Gy showed better rates of 2-year FFLP and OS than patients treated with a BED <100 Gy (FFLP, 89% vs 69%; OS, 80% vs 67%; P < .001). In the multivariable analysis before and after PSM, BED ≥100 Gy was identified as the main prognostic factor for both FFLP and OS (P < .01). Additionally, a dose-response relationship was observed between FFLP and BED (odds ratio, 0.92 per 5 Gy, P = .048).

CONCLUSIONS

A BED ≥100 Gy was significantly associated with outcomes, and a dose-response relationship was observed between local tumor progression and BED. Given that SBRT is being increasingly used in HCC, detailed consensus guidelines regarding SBRT dose prescription should be established.

Effectiveness of stereotactic ablative radiotherapy in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma unsuitable for transarterial chemoembolization

Background:

Stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) can deliver tumoricidal doses and achieve long-term control in early hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, limited studies have investigated the safety and effectiveness of SABR in patients with advanced diseases that is unsuitable for transarterial chemoembolization (TACE).

Methods:

In this observational study, we reviewed the medical records of patients with Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) stage C disease treated with linear accelerator-based SABR between 2008 and 2016. Their tumors were either refractory to TACE or TACE was contraindicated. Overall survival (OS), in-field progression-free survival (IFPFS), and out-field progression-free survival were calculated using Kaplan–Meier analysis. The Cox regression model was used to examine the effects of variables. Treatment-related toxicities were scored according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (version 4.03) and whether patients developed radiation-induced liver disease (RILD) after SABR.

Results:

This study included 32 patients. The mean maximal tumor diameter and tumor volumes were 4.7 cm and 135.9 ml, respectively. Patients received linear accelerator-based SABR with a median prescribed dose of 48 Gy (30–60 Gy) in three to six fractions. Based on the assessment of treatment response by using the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (version 1.1), 19% of patients achieved a complete response and 53% achieved a partial response. After a median follow-up of 18.1 months (4.0–65.9 months), 10, 19, and 9 patients experienced in-field failure, out-field hepatic recurrence, and extrahepatic metastases, respectively. The estimated 2-year OS and IFPFS rates were 54.4% and 62.7%, respectively. In a multivariate analysis, a pretreatment Cancer of the Liver Italian Program (CLIP) score of ⩾2 (p = 0.01) was a prognostic factor for shorter OS, and a biologically effective dose (BED) of < 85 Gy₁₀ (p = 0.011) and a Child–Pugh score of ⩾6 (p = 0.014) were prognostic factors for inferior IFPFS. In this study five and eight patients developed classic and nonclassic RILD, respectively.

Conclusions:

SABR can serve as a salvage treatment for patients with HCC with BCLC stage C disease unsuitable for TACE, in particular, in those with a baseline CLIP score of ⩽1. A BED₁₀ of ⩾85 Gy is an appropriate prescribed dose for tumor control. Because out-field relapse is the major cause of treatment failure, SABR in combination with novel systemic modalities should be investigated in future studies.

Hepatocellular carcinoma in the noncirrhotic liver: a literature review

Development of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is usually preceded by chronic liver injury and ongoing liver diseases. Liver cirrhosis reflects the outcome of long-term liver injury and is associated with an increased risk of developing HCC. However, HCC also arises in individuals without cirrhosis and bears several characteristics distinct from HCC in the cirrhotic liver. The molecular characteristics, prognosis, and surveillance of noncirrhotic HCC have not been adequately studied. In this review, we update readers and researchers in the field with the latest understanding of the epidemiology, etiology, clinical features, diagnosis, treatment strategies, prognosis, and surveillance of noncirrhotic HCC.

Stereotactic body radiation therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma: Practice patterns, dose selection and factors impacting survival

Background

Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is an emerging option for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) without consensus regarding optimal dose schemas. This analysis identifies practice patterns and factors that influence dose selection and overall survival, with particular emphasis on dose and tumor size.

Materials/Methods

Query of the National Cancer Database (NCDB) identified patients with unresectable, nonmetastatic HCC who received SBRT from 2004 to 2013. Biological Effective Dose (BED) was calculated for each patient in order to uniformly analyze different fractionation regimens.

Results

A total of 456 patients met the inclusion criteria. The median BED was 100 Gy (22.5‐208.0), which corresponded to the most common dose fractionation (50 Gy in five fractions). Various factors influenced dose selection including tumor size (P < 0.001), tumor stage (P = 0.002), and facility case volume (<0.001). On multivariate analysis, low BED (<75 Gy, HR 2.537, P < 0.001; 75‐100 Gy, HR 1.986, P = 0.007), increasing tumor size (HR 1.067, P = 0.032), elevated AFP (HR 1.585, P = 0.019), stage 3 (HR 1.962, P < 0.001), low‐volume facilities (1‐5 cases HR 1.687, P = 0.006), and a longer time interval from diagnosis to SBRT (>2 to ≤4 months, HR 1.456, P = 0.048; >4 months, HR 2.192, P < 0.001) were associated with worse survival.

Conclusion

SBRT use is increasing for HCC, and multiple regimens are clinically employed. Although high BED was associated with improved outcomes, multiple factors contributed to the dose selection with favorable patients receiving higher doses. Continued efforts to enhance radiation planning and delivery may help improve utilization, safety, and efficacy.