1
|
Karthaus M. [Chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting]. HNO 2023:10.1007/s00106-023-01315-9. [PMID: 37268826 DOI: 10.1007/s00106-023-01315-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/04/2023]
Abstract
Chemotherapy-induced nausea and the subsequent vomiting (CINV) are adverse effects of cancer treatment associated with considerable burden for the patient. CINV has a significant negative impact on quality of life. The consequent loss of fluids and electrolytes can lead to impaired renal function or weight loss, which may lead to hospitalization. If CINV later results in anticipatory vomiting, this complicates both CINV prophylaxis and further chemotherapy, which can endanger the continuation of cancer treatment. The introduction of high-dose dexamethasone as well as 5‑HT3 and NK1 receptor antagonists has led to a significant improvement of CINV prophylaxis since the 1990s. Recommendations on CINV prophylaxis are in available in guidelines. Adherence to these guidelines results in better outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Meinolf Karthaus
- Med. Klinik IV, Hämatologie-Onkologie/Palliativmedizin, Klinikum Neuperlach, Oskar-Maria-Graf-Ring 51, 81737, München, Deutschland.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Aapro M, Jordan K, Scotté F, Celio L, Karthaus M, Roeland E. Netupitant-palonosetron (NEPA) for Preventing Chemotherapy-induced Nausea and Vomiting: From Clinical Trials to Daily Practice. Curr Cancer Drug Targets 2022; 22:806-824. [PMID: 35570542 PMCID: PMC9720881 DOI: 10.2174/1568009622666220513094352] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/31/2021] [Revised: 01/13/2022] [Accepted: 02/25/2022] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
Chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) is a common adverse event associated with many anticancer therapies and can negatively impact patients' quality of life and potentially limit the effectiveness of chemotherapy. Currently, CINV can be prevented in most patients with guideline-recommended antiemetic regimens. However, clinicians do not always follow guidelines, and patients often face difficulties adhering to their prescribed treatments. Therefore, approaches to increase guideline adherence need to be implemented. NEPA is the first and only fixed combination antiemetic, composed of netupitant (oral)/fosnetupitant (intravenous) and palonosetron, which, together with dexamethasone, constitute a triple antiemetic combination recommended for the prevention of CINV for patients receiving highly emetogenic chemotherapy and for certain patients receiving moderately emetogenic chemotherapy. Thus, NEPA offers a convenient and straightforward antiemetic treatment that could improve adherence to guidelines. This review provides an overview of CINV, evaluates the accumulated evidence of NEPA's antiemetic activity and safety from clinical trials and real-world practice, and examines the preliminary evidence of antiemetic control with NEPA in daily clinical settings beyond those described in pivotal trials. Moreover, we review the utility of NEPA in controlling nausea and preserving patients' quality of life during chemotherapy, two major concerns in managing patients with cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matti Aapro
- Address correspondence to this author at the Genolier Cancer Centre, Clinique de Genolier, Genolier, Switzerland; Tel: +41 22-366-9136; Fax: +41 22-366-9207; E-mail:
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Md Yusof M, Abdullah MM, Yap BK, Ng SC, Low JSH, Lam KS, Ahmad Badruddin RBA, Lai CNB, Lau KL, Chong KJ, Nonis JG, Ahmad Annuar MA, Abdul Rahman MHFB. Real-world multicenter study of the safety and efficacy of netupitant plus palonosetron fixed-dose combination to prevent chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting among Malaysian patients receiving moderately or highly emetogenic chemotherapy. Asia Pac J Clin Oncol 2021; 18:419-427. [PMID: 34811924 DOI: 10.1111/ajco.13667] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/16/2021] [Accepted: 08/17/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
AIM A large proportion of cancer patients are at high risk for chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV), but the choice of anti-emetics for CINV in Malaysia is limited. METHODS This was a real-world study of a fixed-dose combination of netupitant and palonosetron (NEPA) to inhibit CINV in adult patients receiving moderately (MEC) or highly emetogenic chemotherapy (HEC) for solid/hematological malignancies at eight Malaysian centers. Each HEC/MEC cycle received one dose of NEPA + dexamethasone for CINV prevention. Complete response (no emesis, no rescue medication) (CR), no more than mild nausea (severity score ≤ 2.5), and complete control (CR) (no more than mild nausea) during the acute (0-24 h), delayed (25-120 h), and overall (0-120 h) phases post-chemotherapy were measured. Treatment-related adverse events (AEs) were recorded. RESULTS During March 2016-April 2018 (NMRR-17-3286-38282), NEPA + dexamethasone was administered to 54 patients (77.8% solid, 22.2% hematological malignancies). Note that 59.3% received HEC, while 40.7% received MEC regimen. During the overall phase of the first cycle, the majority had CR (77.8%), no more than mild nausea (74.1%), and complete control (61.1%). Seventeen patients received two consecutive cycles at any point of chemotherapy cycles. During the overall phases across two consecutive cycles, all patients achieved CR, and the majority reported no more than mild nausea and complete control. No grades 3-4 AEs were reported. CONCLUSIONS NEPA had sustained efficacy and tolerability at first administration and across two cycles of MEC/HEC for CINV prevention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Soo Chin Ng
- Subang Jaya Medical Centre, Subang Jaya, Selangor, Malaysia
| | | | - Kai Seng Lam
- Pantai Hospital Kuala Lumpur, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
| | | | | | - Kah Liew Lau
- Borneo Medical Centre, Kuching, Sarawak, Malaysia
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Davis M, Hui D, Davies A, Ripamonti C, Capela A, DeFeo G, Del Fabbro E, Bruera E. MASCC antiemetics in advanced cancer updated guideline. Support Care Cancer 2021; 29:8097-8107. [PMID: 34398289 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-021-06437-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/11/2021] [Accepted: 07/12/2021] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Nausea and vomiting are a common clinical symptom in the advanced cancer patient. Pharmacologic management is important. Evidence for drug choices and guidelines are needed to help clinicians manage nausea and vomiting in this population METHODS: Evidence from a systematic review published in 2010, initial MASCC guidelines developed from a systematic review of literature to 2015, and a new systematic review of randomized trials published between 2015 and February 2, 2021, was combined to establish a new guideline. RESULTS A search of the literature between 2015 and February 2, 2021, revealed 257 abstracts of which there was one systematic review and 4 randomized trials which were used to modify the guideline. The new guideline is as follows: First Line: Metoclopramide (II) multiple small RCTs including a placebo-controlled trial, haloperidol (II) multiple non-placebo-controlled RCTs, high consensus. Second line: Methotrimeprazine (II) 1 well-powered non-placebo-controlled RCT, olanzapine (II) 1 placebo-controlled pilot RCT, high consensus. Third line: Tropisetron (II) large unblinded lower quality non-placebo-controlled RCT, levosulpiride (II) 1 blinded non-placebo-controlled pilot RCT, high consensus. DISCUSSION Haloperidol, metoclopramide, methotrimeprazine, olanzapine tropisetron, and levosulpiride have been antiemetics used in randomized trials with antiemetic activity demonstrated. There are only three placebo-controlled randomized trials we could find in our literature review. Placebo responses varied significantly between two randomized trials. More randomized placebo-controlled trials with either metoclopramide or haloperidol rescue are needed to clarify antiemetic choices in advanced cancer. CONCLUSION First-line antiemetics for nausea and vomiting in advanced cancer are metoclopramide and haloperidol, and second-line medications are methotrimeprazine and olanzapine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - David Hui
- Department of Palliative, Rehabilitation and Integrative Medicine, Division of Cancer Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Andrew Davies
- Trinity College Dublin, University College Dublin, and Our Lady's Hospice Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Carla Ripamonti
- Supportive Care in Cancer Unit, Fondazione IRCCS, Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Onco-Haematology, Milan, Italy
| | - Andreia Capela
- Associação de Investigação de Cuidados de Suporte em Oncologia (AICSO) and Centro Hospitalar Vila Nova de Gaia, Espinho, Portugal
| | - Giulia DeFeo
- Supportive Care in Cancer Unit, Fondazione IRCCS, Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Onco-Haematology, Milan, Italy
| | - Egidio Del Fabbro
- Palliative Care Endowed Chair Division of Hematology, Oncology & Palliative Care Virginia Commonwealth University Massey Cancer Center, Richmond, VA, USA
| | - Eduardo Bruera
- Department of Palliative, Rehabilitation and Integrative Medicine, Division of Cancer Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Shirley M. Netupitant/Palonosetron: A Review in Chemotherapy-Induced Nausea and Vomiting. Drugs 2021; 81:1331-1342. [PMID: 34292534 PMCID: PMC8463343 DOI: 10.1007/s40265-021-01558-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/15/2021] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
Abstract
Netupitant/palonosetron (NEPA; Akynzeo®), available in oral and intravenous (IV) formulations, is a fixed-dose combination of the neurokinin 1 (NK1) receptor antagonist netupitant (or the prodrug, fosnetupitant, in the IV formulation) and the second-generation serotonin 3 (5-HT3) receptor antagonist palonosetron. Administered as a single dose, (fos)netupitant/palonosetron (in combination with dexamethasone) is indicated for the prevention of acute and delayed chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) in adults. In clinical trials, (fos)netupitant/palonosetron plus dexamethasone was associated with high complete response rates (no emesis and no rescue medication) in the acute, delayed and overall phases in patients receiving highly or moderately emetogenic chemotherapy, with efficacy maintained over multiple cycles. Further, oral netupitant/palonosetron was found to be superior to palonosetron and non-inferior to aprepitant plus granisetron in preventing CINV in individual trials. Both the oral and IV formulations of the drug combination are well tolerated. The fixed-dose combination is concordant with guideline recommendations and provides a simple and convenient option for prophylaxis against acute and delayed CINV in patients receiving highly or moderately emetogenic chemotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matt Shirley
- Springer Nature, Private Bag 65901, Mairangi Bay, Auckland, 0754, New Zealand.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Mukhopadhyay S, Dutta P, Banerjee S, Bhattacharya B, Biswas S, M Navari R. Low-dose olanzapine, sedation and chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting: a prospective randomized controlled study. Future Oncol 2021; 17:2041-2056. [PMID: 33792376 DOI: 10.2217/fon-2020-0834] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Aims: Comparison of efficacy, safety and sedation between two doses of olanzapine in the control of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV). Patients & methods: A prospective, randomized, double-blind, controlled study was conducted, enrolling 68 patients receiving a single-day cycle of high and moderately emetogenic chemotherapy. Patients received either of olanzapine 5 mg or 10 mg from day 1 through 3 in addition to ondansetron and dexamethasone. Control of CINV, nausea, sedation, quality of life (QoL) and adverse events were compared. Results: Nausea, emesis control and improvement of QoL were similar in both groups. Sedation severity was 133% higher with 10 mg olanzapine. Conclusions: Lower dose olanzapine is effective to control CINV with significantly reduced sedation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Premnath Dutta
- Radiation Oncology, Burdwan Medical College, Burdwan, 713104, India
| | - Sanatan Banerjee
- Radiation Oncology, Burdwan Medical College, Burdwan, 713104, India
| | | | - Supreeti Biswas
- Pharmacology, Nil Ratan Sircar Medical College, Kolkata, 700014, India
| | - Rudolf M Navari
- Cancer Care Program, Central & South America, World Health Organization, Simon Williamson Clinic, Birmingham, AL 35211, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Karthaus M, Voisin D, Rizzi G, Ciuleanu T. Phase 3 Study of Palonosetron IV Infusion Vs. IV Bolus for Chemotherapy-Induced Nausea and Vomiting Prophylaxis After Highly Emetogenic Chemotherapy. J Pain Symptom Manage 2020; 60:568-576. [PMID: 32276098 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2020.03.034] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/13/2020] [Revised: 03/24/2020] [Accepted: 03/27/2020] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
Abstract
CONTEXT Palonosetron (PALO) is one of the two active components of NEPA, the fixed-combination antiemetic comprising netupitant (oral)/fosnetupitant (IV) and PALO. To increase the convenience of NEPA administration, especially for patients with swallowing difficulties, an IV NEPA formulation has been developed, where PALO is administered as a 30-minute infusion instead of the approved 30-second bolus. OBJECTIVES To determine the efficacy and safety of the PALO component used in IV NEPA. METHODS Noninferiority, double-blind, and randomized Phase 3 trial in chemotherapy-naive adult patients with cancer requiring highly emetogenic chemotherapy. Patients were randomized to receive a single dose of PALO 0.25 mg administered IV either as a 30-minute infusion or as a 30-second bolus before highly emetogenic chemotherapy. The primary objective was to demonstrate noninferiority of the 30-minute infusion vs. 30-second bolus in terms of complete response (CR; no emesis and no rescue medication) in the acute phase. Secondary efficacy endpoints were CR in the delayed and overall phases and no emesis and no rescue medication in all phases. Safety was a secondary endpoint. RESULTS Overall, 440 patients received study treatment. In the infusion group, 186 (82.7%) patients reported CR in the acute phase vs. 186 (86.5%) patients in the bolus group, demonstrating the noninferiority of PALO infusion vs. bolus (P < 0.001). Secondary endpoints showed similar results between the two treatment groups. CONCLUSION PALO 0.25-mg 30-minute IV infusion was noninferior to 30-second IV bolus in terms of CR rate in the acute phase. These results support the use of PALO 0.25 mg as a component of IV NEPA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Meinolf Karthaus
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Klinikum Neuperlach/Klinikum Harlaching, Munich, Germany.
| | | | - Giada Rizzi
- Helsinn Healthcare SA, Lugano, Switzerland; Chiesi Farmaceutici SpA, Parma, Italy
| | - Tudor Ciuleanu
- Institute of Oncology Prof. Dr. Ion Chiricuţã and UMF Iuliu Haţieganu, Cluj-Napoca, Romania
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Lorusso V, Russo A, Giotta F, Codega P. Management of Chemotherapy-Induced Nausea and Vomiting (CINV): A Short Review on the Role of Netupitant-Palonosetron (NEPA). CORE EVIDENCE 2020; 15:21-29. [PMID: 32802009 PMCID: PMC7394513 DOI: 10.2147/ce.s203634] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/21/2020] [Accepted: 05/18/2020] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
Introduction Antineoplastic drugs may induce several side effects, including chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV). Two neurotransmitters play a central role in mediating the emetic response: serotonin acting on the 5HT3 receptor and the substance P targeting the NK1 receptor. Indeed, a combination of a 5HT3 receptor antagonist (5HT3-RA) and a NK1 receptor antagonist (NK1-RA) together with dexamethasone has been shown to be very effective. In fact, this combination is actually widely used and recommended for CINV prophylaxis for highly emetogenic cisplatin-based adriamycin/cyclophosphamide (AC) and carboplatin-based regimens. NEPA (netupitant/palonosetron) is the only fixed combination antiemetic available and it is composed by the long-lasting second-generation 5HT3-RA palonosetron and the highly selective NK1-RA netupitant. Aim The aims of this short review were to analyze the role of NEPA in CINV prophylaxis and management taking in account the risk factors related to the patient and to the antineoplastic treatment. Evidence Review CINV development is not only correlated to the emetogenic potential of the antineoplastic drugs but is also very influenced by the patient characteristics and history, such as gender, age, alcohol intake, nausea during pregnancy and motion sickness. In pivotal and post-registration studies, NEPA has demonstrated to be effective and safe in both highly and moderately emetogenic chemotherapy. Conclusion A proper assessment of both chemotherapy- and patient-related risk factors is paramount to properly evaluate an appropriate prophylaxis of CINV and NEPA by simplifying the therapy, guarantees fully adherence to antiemetic guidelines, and consequently improves the control of CINV, especially in high risk patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vito Lorusso
- Medical Oncology Unit, IRCCS Istituto Tumori "Giovanni Paolo II", Bari, Italy
| | - Anna Russo
- Medical Oncology Unit, IRCCS Istituto Tumori "Giovanni Paolo II", Bari, Italy
| | - Francesco Giotta
- Medical Oncology Unit, IRCCS Istituto Tumori "Giovanni Paolo II", Bari, Italy
| | - Paolo Codega
- Medical Affairs Department, Italfarmaco SpA, Cinisello Balsamo, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Karthaus M, Schiel X, Ruhlmann CH, Celio L. Neurokinin-1 receptor antagonists: review of their role for the prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting in adults. Expert Rev Clin Pharmacol 2019; 12:661-680. [PMID: 31194593 DOI: 10.1080/17512433.2019.1621162] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
Abstract
Introduction: The addition of neurokinin-1 receptor antagonists (NK1RAs) to standard prophylaxis of 5-hydroxytryptamine-3 RA (5-HT3RA) plus dexamethasone more effectively prevents chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) associated with highly and moderately emetogenic chemotherapy. Areas covered: This review presents the evidence base for the use of oral and intravenous (IV) NK1RAs, focusing on the pharmacologic and clinical properties as a class, and highlighting differences between agents. A PubMed literature search was conducted from 2000 to 2018. Expert opinion: Adherence to international antiemetic guidelines remains a clinical challenge. Strategies to simplify antiemetic regimens and facilitate their administration may improve compliance and treatment outcomes. The use of fixed-combination antiemetics offers clinical utility, in combining an NK1RA with a 5-HT3RA in a single oral dose. The use of long-lasting NK1RAs and administering CINV prophylaxis closer to the time of chemotherapy may also assist with guideline and treatment compliance, diminishing the need for home-based administration, and potentially reducing resource utilization. The availability of IV and oral formulations of NK1RAs and NK1RA-5-HT3RA fixed combinations offers further utility, particularly for those patients unsuited for oral administration. However, safety considerations with respect to injection site toxicity and hypersensitivity reactions of the new NK1RA IV formulations deserve close attention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Meinolf Karthaus
- a Department of Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Care , Klinikum Neuperlach , Munich , Germany.,b Department of Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Care , Klinikum Harlaching , Munich , Germany
| | - Xaver Schiel
- b Department of Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Care , Klinikum Harlaching , Munich , Germany
| | | | - Luigi Celio
- d Department of Medical Oncology and Hematology , Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori , Milan , Italy
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Schwartzberg L, Karthaus M, Rossi G, Rizzi G, Borroni ME, Rugo HS, Jordan K, Hansen V. Fixed combination of oral NEPA (netupitant-palonosetron) for the prevention of acute and delayed chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting in patients receiving multiple cycles of chemotherapy: Efficacy data from 2 randomized, double-blind phase III studies. Cancer Med 2019; 8:2064-2073. [PMID: 30968588 PMCID: PMC6536946 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.2091] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/15/2018] [Accepted: 01/15/2019] [Indexed: 01/29/2023] Open
Abstract
AIM To assess the efficacy of oral NEPA (netupitant-palonosetron 300/0.50 mg) over multiple chemotherapy cycles. METHODS Two randomized phase III studies evaluated a single dose of oral NEPA given on day 1 in chemotherapy-naive patients receiving anthracycline-cyclophosphamide (AC)-based (Study 1) or highly (HEC)/moderately (MEC) emetogenic chemotherapy (safety Study 2). Oral NEPA was compared with oral palonosetron 0.50 mg (Study 1) or oral aprepitant 125 mg day 1, 80 mg days 2-3/palonosetron 0.50 mg (Study 2; no formal statistical comparisons). Oral dexamethasone was administered in all treatment groups. Complete response (CR; no emesis/no rescue medication), no emesis, and no significant nausea (NSN) rates during acute (0-24 h) and delayed (>24-120 h) phases of chemotherapy cycles 1-4 in each study were evaluated. RESULTS In Study 1, 1450 patients received 5969 chemotherapy cycles; in Study 2, 412 patients received 1961 chemotherapy cycles. In each study, ≥75% of patients completed 4 or more cycles. In Study 1, oral NEPA was superior to palonosetron in preventing chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) in the acute and delayed phases of cycle 1, with higher rates of CR (all P < 0.05), no emesis (all P < 0.05), and NSN (delayed phase P < 0.05 cycles 1, 2, and 4) reported across 4 cycles. In Study 2, oral NEPA had numerically higher CR and NSN rates in the acute and delayed phases than aprepitant-palonosetron in MEC/HEC patients. CONCLUSION Oral NEPA was highly effective in preventing both acute and delayed CINV over multiple chemotherapy cycles of HEC, AC, and MEC regimens. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBERS Study 1, NCT01339260; Study 2, NCT01376297.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | - Hope S. Rugo
- University of California San Francisco Comprehensive Cancer CenterSan FranciscoCalifornia
| | - Karin Jordan
- Department of Medicine V, Hematology, Oncology and RheumatologyUniversity of HeidelbergGermany
| | | |
Collapse
|