Epidemiology and survival of HPV-related tonsillar carcinoma

Mortality patterns of patients with tonsillar squamous cell carcinoma: a population-based study

Objective

Tonsillar squamous cell carcinoma (TSCC) and second primary malignancies (SPMs) are the most common causes of mortality in patients with primary TSCC. However, the competing data on TSCC-specific death (TSD) or SPM-related death in patients with TSCC have not been evaluated. This study aimed to analyze the mortality patterns and formulate prediction models of mortality risk caused by TSCC and SPMs.

Methods

Data on patients with a first diagnosis of TSCC were extracted as the training cohort from the 18 registries comprising the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. A competing risk approach of cumulation incidence function was used to estimate cumulative incidence curves. Fine and gray proportional sub-distributed hazard model analyses were performed to investigate the risk factors of TSD and SPMs. A nomogram was developed to predict the 5- and 10-year risk probabilities of death caused by TSCC and SPMs. Moreover, data from the 22 registries of the SEER database were also extracted to validate the nomograms.

Results

In the training cohort, we identified 14,530 patients with primary TSCC, with TSCC (46.84%) as the leading cause of death, followed by SPMs (26.86%) among all causes of death. In the proportion of SPMs, the lungs and bronchus (22.64%) were the most common sites for SPM-related deaths, followed by the larynx (9.99%), esophagus (8.46%), and Non-Melanoma skin (6.82%). Multivariate competing risk model showed that age, ethnicity, marital status, primary site, summary stage, radiotherapy, and surgery were independently associated with mortality caused by TSCC and SPMs. Such risk factors were selected to formulate prognostic nomograms. The nomograms showed preferable discrimination and calibration in both the training and validation cohorts.

Conclusion

Patients with primary TSCC have a high mortality risk of SPMs, and the competing risk nomogram has an ideal performance for predicting TSD and SPMs-related mortality. Routine follow-up care for TSCC survivors should be expanded to monitor SPMs.

Detection of HPV infection in head and neck cancers: Promise and pitfalls in the last ten years: A meta-analysis

The current controversial discussion on the disease-specific survival of patients with human papillomavirus (HPV)-positive (+) and -negative (-) squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of the head neck region was the motivation for the present meta-analysis. Different detection methods for HPV are available, though these often lack sensitivity. As a consequence, there may be false interpretation of HPV positivity. A bias concerning HPV status and therefore also survival rates is serving a non-durable relevance in the discussion of tailored therapies. A literature search was performed via the online database PubMed/NCBI, and data extraction and statistical analysis were conducted. A total of 139 studies published between 2004 and 2014 were evaluated in the present meta-analysis. The HPV detection methods, patient characteristics, tumor localizations and stages, as well as (neo-) adjuvant therapies and survival times were analyzed. The average incidence rates of HPV+ patients with oropharyngeal tumors were higher than those of patients with cancers of other regions of the head and neck. Upon evaluating the results of different detection methods no significant differences were identified. We have compared the HPV incidence rates of each detection method, when studies have used more than one. Regarding overall survival, the pooled adjusted hazard ratio (HR) for oropharyngeal SCC was 0.31 [95% confidence interval (CI)=0.27-0.36]. Unfortunately, only 3 equivalent studies were available on nonoropharyngeal tumors, for which the pooled adjusted HR was 1 (95% CI=0.73-1.36). Overall, the evaluation demonstrated that the survival rates reported in numerous studies were not evaluated multifactorially and important confounders were excluded from the statistics. The HPV detection methods used were often not sufficient in representing HPV positivity. In addition, oropharyngeal and oral SCCs were assessed together in the localization. The widely differing number of HPV+ patients in each of the various studies may be explained by insufficient detection methods and by a lack of localization distinction. The considerations of a tailored therapy according to HPV status should be rejected based on the present information. The previously published studies should be read critically and do not represent a basis for therapeutic decisions.

Presenting symptoms and clinical findings in HPV-positive and HPV-negative oropharyngeal cancer patients

OBJECTIVES

Oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) is divided in two different disease entities depending on HPV involvement. We investigated differences in presenting symptoms and clinical findings in patients with HPV-positive and -negative OPSCC tumors.

METHODS

Altogether 118 consecutive patients diagnosed with primary OPSCC between 2012 and 2014 at the Helsinki University Hospital were included. HPV-status of the tumors was assessed by PCR detection of HPV DNA and immunostaining with p16-INK4a antibody.

RESULTS

Fifty-one (47.7%) of the patients had HPV-positive and 56 (52.3%) HPV-negative tumors. Forty-nine (49/51, 96.1%) of the HPV+ tumors were also p16+ showing high concordance. The most common presenting symptom among HPV+/p16+ patients was a neck mass (53.1%), whereas any sort of pain in the head and neck area was more frequently related to the HPV-/p16- (60.0%) group. HPV+/p16+ tumors had a tendency to locate in the tonsillar complex and more likely had already spread into regional lymph nodes compared with HPV-/p16- tumors. Smoking and heavy alcohol consumption were significantly more common among HPV−/p16− patients but also rather common among HPV+/p16+ patients [corrected].

CONCLUSIONS

This analysis of symptoms and signs confirm that OPSCC can be dichotomized in two distinct disease entities as defined by HPV status.

Multimodality Treatment of Early-Stage Tonsil Cancer

Objective

Compare survival outcomes between unimodality and multimodality treatments for early-stage tonsil squamous cell carcinoma (SCC).

Study Design and Setting

Review of the National Cancer Database.

Subjects and Methods

Patients were selected if they were <70 years old with clinical stage I-II SCC of the tonsil, as documented in the National Cancer Database from 1998 to 2011. Palliative and nonstandard treatments were excluded. Propensity score matching was performed, controlling for tumor stage, age, race, comorbidity, insurance status, and year of diagnosis. Overall survival (OS) was compared with the Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test.

Results

We identified 3247 patients. Radiotherapy (RT) was delivered in 1295 patients (39.9%), surgery in 824 (25.4%), and surgery + RT in 1128 (34.7%). Patients treated with surgery + RT had the highest 5-year OS (81.1%), followed by surgery (67.4%) and RT (63.4%; P < .001). In a propensity score–matched subpopulation of 2378 patients, the 5-year OS was 78.8% for surgery + RT, 66.7% for surgery, and 64.5% for RT ( P < .001). Among patients who underwent surgical tonsillectomy plus elective neck dissection and/or adjuvant RT, the 5-year OS was equal ( P = .29), and all were superior to RT alone ( P < .001).

Conclusion

Multimodality treatment is associated with the greatest survival in early-stage tonsil cancer. The addition of tonsillectomy to RT confers a 20% increase in survival. The current guidelines might not offer the most effective treatment. An up-front surgical approach, followed by appropriately selected adjuvant therapy, may result in improved survival for early-stage tonsil SCC. These findings merit investigation in a prospective clinical trial.

Human Papillomavirus Associated Cancers of the Head and Neck: An Australian Perspective

Human papillomavirus (HPV) associated head and neck squamous cell carcinomas (HNSCCs), have become a serious global health problem. Despite decreases in HPV-negative HNSCCs, the prevalence of HPV-positive HNSCCs has significantly increased. HPV-positive cancers are associated with superior survival outcomes when compared to HPV-negative cancers, which appears likely to be associated with differences in the molecular pathogenesis of the two diseases. While therapies are still problematic, the current HPV vaccine programs hold a promise for the primary prevention of HPV-related HNSCCs and since Australia was the first to introduce a nationwide HPV vaccine program, it is in a unique position to observe the effects of the vaccine on HNSCCs. This review discusses the epidemiological trends associated with HPV in HNSCC, with reference to the differences between HPV-positive and HPV-negative HNSCCs and the prevention potential of HPV vaccines.

Association of periodontitis and human papillomavirus in oral rinse specimens: Results from the National Health and Nutrition Survey 2009-2012

BACKGROUND

Human papillomavirus (HPV)-positive oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinomas are increasing in incidence and are becoming significant public health concerns. Periodontitis is a chronic condition in which the affected tissue may facilitate oral HPV infection and persistence. The purpose of this study was to determine if an association of the presence of HPV in oral rinse specimens and periodontal disease exists.

METHODS

The authors combined the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) data for years 2009-2010 and 2011-2012. The authors included participants aged 30-69 years who had clinically assessed periodontal and HPV data (n = 6,004). The authors analyzed the data using the Rao-Scott χ(2) test and logistic regression.

RESULTS

There were 498 participants who had the presence of HPV in oral rinse specimens. The adjusted odds ratio for the presence of HPV in oral rinse specimens with relation to periodontal disease was 1.04 (95% confidence interval, 0.63-1.73), adjusting for sex, race and ethnicity, education, age, income-to-poverty ratio, smoking, alcohol use, and number of sex partners during their lifetime.

CONCLUSIONS

The authors failed to reject the hypothesis of no association of the presence of HPV in oral rinse specimens and periodontitis.

PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS

Although oral HPV infection is a serious concern, the authors found that periodontitis was not shown to be related to the presence of HPV in oral rinse specimens in adjusted analyses in this study.

Adverse effect of smoking on prognosis in human papillomavirus-associated oropharyngeal carcinoma

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this retrospective study was to identify prognostic factors in a cohort of patients with oropharyngeal carcinoma treated with intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT).

METHODS

Medical records of 142 patients treated with (chemo)radiotherapy between September 2005 and September 2011 were reviewed and the human papillomavirus (HPV) status was determined by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) analysis. Potential prognostic factors for 3-year locoregional control and overall survival (OS) were evaluated.

RESULTS

HPV-positive patients (n = 82) had locoregional control and OS of 78% and 79%, respectively. Significant prognostic factors on multivariate analysis were smoking (p = .03) for locoregional control and OS, and comorbidity (p = .04) for OS. Further stratification was done according to smoking behavior in HPV-positive patients. Locoregional control in current smokers was 67% compared to 86% in never smokers and former smokers, respectively (p = .02).

CONCLUSION

Smoking was the only modifiable prognostic factor in HPV-positive patients. Therefore, active stop-smoking programs must be integrated in the routine management of patients to maximize treatment results. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Head Neck 38: 1780-1787, 2016.

Is treatment de-escalation a reality in HPV related oropharyngeal cancer?

The incidence of HPV related oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) is rapidly increasing. It is now well recognised as a distinct clinical and biologic entity, compared to traditional OPSCC. The majority of these patients have an excellent prognosis due to the chemo-radiosensitive nature of these tumours. The de-escalation of current treatment regimens have therefore been proposed in an attempt to reduce the long term treatment related morbidity of this much younger patient cohort. Several of the more pertinent points regarding safe de-escalation strategies are considered within this manuscript.

Investigation of the presence of HPV related oropharyngeal and oral tongue squamous cell carcinoma in Mozambique

BACKGROUND

Cervical cancer caused by the human papillomavirus (HPV) is endemic in East Africa. Recent, dramatic, increases in the incidence of oropharyngeal cancer in the United States and Europe are linked to the same high risk HPV genotypes responsible for cervical cancer. Currently, there is extremely limited data regarding the role of HPV in head and neck cancers in Africa. Evidence of HPV as an etiologic agent in head and neck cancers in Africa would have important prevention and treatment implications.

METHODS

A retrospective single institution review of oral tongue and oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinomas diagnosed between 2005 and 2013 was performed. Individual case data for 51 patients with biopsy proven squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) from the oropharynx (n=22) and oral tongue (n=29) were identified. Formalin fixed, paraffin embedded biopsy samples were obtained and evaluated for p16 by immunohistochemistry and HPV genotype 16 specific oncogenes, E6 and E7, by PCR.

RESULTS

All of the positive controls, but none of the oropharyngeal samples stained positively for p16. Two of the oral tongue samples stained positive for p16. None of the oropharyngeal or oral tongue cases demonstrated PCR products for HPV-16 E6 or E7.

CONCLUSIONS

Though Mozambique has extremely high levels of HPV positive cervical cancer this study demonstrates an absence of HPV positive oropharyngeal or oral tongue squamous cell carcinoma within biopsy samples from a single referral hospital in Maputo, the capital of Mozambique.

Outcome and prognostic factors in T4a oropharyngeal carcinoma, including the role of HPV infection

Background. The prognosis of patients with advanced oropharyngeal carcinoma (OPSCC) is generally poor. The aim of this study is to investigate the different therapeutic approaches and identify prognostic factors associated with a worse outcome for patients treated for T4a OPSCC, in order to improve treatment selection for the individual. Methods. A retrospective study was conducted on 426 patients with T4a OPC treated between 1980 and 2010. Eleven prognostic factors including treatment modality, lymph node staging, and p16 status as a surrogate marker for human papillomavirus (HPV) infection were analyzed. Results. Univariate analysis showed a significant difference in DSS between N0 and N+ (57.1% versus 26.9%, P < 0.001), primary surgical and primary nonsurgical treatment (52.7% versus 31.4%, P < 0.001), and perinodal invasion (51.7% versus 19.9%, P = 0.011). P16-negative patients tended towards a worse DSS than p16-positive patients (40.2% versus 64.6%, P = 0.126) but responded better to primary surgery than to nonsurgical treatment (71.4% versus 34.0%, P = 0.113). Multivariate analysis identified the N category as an independent prognostic factor for survival. Conclusion. The survival of p16-negative patients was worse than p16-positive patients, although they seem to respond better to primary surgery. The strongest independent prognostic factor for T4a carcinomas proved to be the presence of lymph node metastases.

Early stage oropharyngeal carcinomas: comparing quality of life for different treatment modalities

OBJECTIVE

To compare long-term quality of life outcomes after treating early stage oropharyngeal carcinoma either with surgery, surgery combined with radiotherapy, or surgery combined with chemoradiotherapy.

METHODS

Questionnaire based method: 111 eligible patients agreed to fill out a quality of life questionnaire.

RESULTS

Of the 32 scales contained in the EORTC's combined QLQ-C30 and HN35, 11 scales show significantly better results for the surgery-only treatment group when compared to either surgery combined with radiotherapy or surgery combined with any type of adjuvant therapy. These eleven scales are role function (P = 0.019/0.008), social function (P = 0.01/0.034), nausea (P = 0.017/0.025), pain (P = 0.014/0.023), financial problems (P = 0.030/0.012), speech (P = 0.02/0.015), social eating (P = 0.003/<0.001), mouth opening (P = 0.033/0.016), sticky saliva (P = 0.001/<0.001), swallowing (P < 0.001/<0.001), and dry mouth (P < 0.001/0.001).

CONCLUSION

Treatment of early stage oropharyngeal carcinoma with surgery alone has definite advantages over treatments including any form of adjuvant therapy when considering quality of life. Advantages manifest themselves especially in functional aspects of the head and neck realm; however general health aspects as well as psychosocial aspects show improvements as well. This study does not show any indication of QOL-related drawbacks of surgery-only treatment approaches.