1
|
Li X, Meng M, Yang D, Zhang J, Zhang X, Zhao J, Yin Y, Pei X, Hao Y. "All about the value?" Decisional needs of breast reconstruction for breast cancer patients in the Chinese context: A mixed-methods study. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING 2024; 120:108102. [PMID: 38141445 DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2023.108102] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/24/2023] [Revised: 11/15/2023] [Accepted: 12/09/2023] [Indexed: 12/25/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To explore breast cancer (BC) patients' participation in breast reconstruction (BR) decision-making and specific decisional needs, especially the manifestations and causes of decisional conflicts, in China. METHODS A mixed-methods study was conducted using triangulation of data from interviews and a questionnaire survey with health care professionals (HCPs) and BC patients with BR decision-making experience at 5 Beijing centers. The Ottawa Decision Support Framework guided (ODSF) the qualitative and quantitative data analyses. RESULTS A total of 82.53% of Chinese BC patients would consider BR. Seven themes captured patients' BR decisional needs per the ODSF: inadequate support/resources (100%, 58.82%) and knowledge (75%, 52.94%) were most frequently cited. Health beliefs (unclear values) reflected Chinese characteristics. Patients had inadequate knowledge (M=19.99/50, SD=8.67) but positive BR attitudes (M=59.48/95, SD=10.45). CONCLUSIONS BR decisions for Chinese BC patients are complex and often accompanied by decisional conflicts. Inadequate knowledge and inadequate support and resources contribute to these conflicts, emphasizing the need for culturally tailored information and support to promote SDM. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS HCPs need specialized training in SDM to guide patients in decision-making. It is essential to provide relevant resources and support that are culturally and clinically appropriate for Chinese patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xuejing Li
- School of Nursing, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, People's Republic of China; Beijing University of Chinese Medicine Collaborating Center of Joanna Briggs Institute, Beijing, People's Republic of China; Beijing University of Chinese Medicine Best Practice Spotlight Organization, Beijing, People's Republic of China
| | - Meiqi Meng
- School of Nursing, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, People's Republic of China; Beijing University of Chinese Medicine Collaborating Center of Joanna Briggs Institute, Beijing, People's Republic of China; Beijing University of Chinese Medicine Best Practice Spotlight Organization, Beijing, People's Republic of China
| | - Dan Yang
- School of Nursing, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, People's Republic of China; Beijing University of Chinese Medicine Collaborating Center of Joanna Briggs Institute, Beijing, People's Republic of China; Beijing University of Chinese Medicine Best Practice Spotlight Organization, Beijing, People's Republic of China
| | - Jingyuan Zhang
- School of Nursing, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, People's Republic of China; Beijing University of Chinese Medicine Collaborating Center of Joanna Briggs Institute, Beijing, People's Republic of China; Beijing University of Chinese Medicine Best Practice Spotlight Organization, Beijing, People's Republic of China
| | - Xiaoyan Zhang
- School of Nursing, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, People's Republic of China; Beijing University of Chinese Medicine Collaborating Center of Joanna Briggs Institute, Beijing, People's Republic of China; Beijing University of Chinese Medicine Best Practice Spotlight Organization, Beijing, People's Republic of China
| | - Junqiang Zhao
- Waypoint Research Institute, Waypoint Centre for Mental Health Care, Penetanguishene, ON L9M 1G3, Canada
| | - Yiyi Yin
- School of Nursing, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, People's Republic of China; Beijing University of Chinese Medicine Collaborating Center of Joanna Briggs Institute, Beijing, People's Republic of China; Beijing University of Chinese Medicine Best Practice Spotlight Organization, Beijing, People's Republic of China
| | - Xue Pei
- School of Management, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
| | - Yufang Hao
- School of Nursing, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, People's Republic of China; Beijing University of Chinese Medicine Collaborating Center of Joanna Briggs Institute, Beijing, People's Republic of China; Beijing University of Chinese Medicine Best Practice Spotlight Organization, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Single Institution Evolution in Defining an Algorithm for Prevention and Management of Severe Complications in Direct-to-Implant Breast Reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2022; 150:48S-60S. [PMID: 35943963 DOI: 10.1097/prs.0000000000009490] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Complications including infection and wound dehiscence are major concerns for direct-to-implant (DTI) breast reconstruction. However, the risk factors associated with severe complications and implant salvage remain unclear. METHODS Retrospective study of all patients undergoing unilateral DTI breast reconstruction from 2014 through 2019. The risk factors associated with complications and prosthesis explantation were identified using multivariate logistic regression modeling and interaction analyses. RESULTS Among 1027 patients enrolled, 90 experienced severe complications, 41of which underwent prosthesis explantation, while 49 were successfully salvaged. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that patients with larger implant size (p=0.003), use of bovine mesh (p<0.001), adjuvant radiotherapy (p=0.047), low plasma albumin (p=0.013), and elevated blood glucose (p=0.006) were significantly more likely to suffer complications. Adjuvant radiation (OR: 7.44; 95%CI, 1.49-37.18; p = 0.014) and obesity (OR, 4.17; 95%CI, 1.17-14.88; p = 0.028) had significantly lower rates of implant salvage as well as surgical site infection (SSI) and wound dehiscence, while mastectomy skin flap necrosis was not associated with device explanation. There were no differences in complication and explantation rates between nipple-sparing and skin-sparing mastectomies. However, the combined impact of SSI and wound dehiscence added over fourteen-fold higher risk of prosthesis explantation (95%CI, 9.97-19.53). CONCLUSION Success in direct-to-implant breast reconstruction is multifactorial. Larger implant size, adjuvant radiation therapy, diabetes, and malnutrition demonstrate increased risk of complications in the DTI approach. Surgical site infections and wound dehiscence should be treated aggressively, but the combination of both complications portends poor salvage rates.
Collapse
|
3
|
Wang S, He S, Zhang X, Sun J, Huang Q, Liu J, Han C, Yin Z, Ding B, Yin J. Acellular bovine pericardium matrix in immediate breast reconstruction compared with conventional implant-based breast reconstruction. JPRAS Open 2021; 29:1-9. [PMID: 33937472 PMCID: PMC8079238 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpra.2021.03.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/24/2020] [Accepted: 03/09/2021] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Acellular Bovine Pericardium Matrix (ABPM) is a new material in implant-based breast reconstruction (IBBR). Few studies have reported on its outcome and complications worldwide and most studies were without a control group. Our aim was to compare its use in IBBR with the other two conventional implant-based reconstruction methods. Methods A retrospective review of patients undergoing IBBR from January to December 2018 was performed. Patients were assigned to the ABPM-assisted IBBR (group A), latissimus dorsi-assisted IBBR (group B) and two-stage IBBR (group C). Patients’ post-operative complications, cost-effectiveness and Quality of Life were compared. Results 100 patients with 100 breasts were included in the study. No complications occurred in group C (n = 11). No significant differences were noted between group A (n = 44) and group B (n = 45) in terms of overall complications (9.1% vs 11.1%, p = 0.973). Group B had the longest operative duration (310.8 ± 62.3 min, p<0.001). The cost of hospitalization forthe three groups was $8051.3 ± 849.2, $7566.0 ± 1172.7 and $7896.5 ± 1762.2, respectively (p = 0.128). The postoperative Breast-Q scores were similar across the three groups. Conclusions ABPM demonstrated acceptable complication rates, cost-effectiveness and quality of life outcomes when compared to LD-assisted IBBR and two-stage IBBR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Wang
- The Department of Breast Oncoplastic Surgery, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, Tianjin 300060, China.,National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin, China.,Key Laboratory of Breast Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin Medical University, Ministry of Education, Tianjin, China.,Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Treatment of Tianjin, Tianjin, China.,Tianjin Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin, China.,The Sino-Russian Joint Research Center for Oncoplastic Breast Surgery, Tianjin, China
| | - S He
- The Department of Breast Oncoplastic Surgery, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, Tianjin 300060, China.,National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin, China.,Key Laboratory of Breast Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin Medical University, Ministry of Education, Tianjin, China.,Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Treatment of Tianjin, Tianjin, China.,Tianjin Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin, China.,The Sino-Russian Joint Research Center for Oncoplastic Breast Surgery, Tianjin, China
| | - X Zhang
- The Department of Breast Oncoplastic Surgery, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, Tianjin 300060, China.,National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin, China.,Key Laboratory of Breast Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin Medical University, Ministry of Education, Tianjin, China.,Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Treatment of Tianjin, Tianjin, China.,Tianjin Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin, China.,The Sino-Russian Joint Research Center for Oncoplastic Breast Surgery, Tianjin, China
| | - J Sun
- The Department of Breast Oncoplastic Surgery, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, Tianjin 300060, China.,National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin, China.,Key Laboratory of Breast Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin Medical University, Ministry of Education, Tianjin, China.,Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Treatment of Tianjin, Tianjin, China.,Tianjin Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin, China.,The Sino-Russian Joint Research Center for Oncoplastic Breast Surgery, Tianjin, China
| | - Q Huang
- The Department of Breast Oncoplastic Surgery, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, Tianjin 300060, China.,National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin, China.,Key Laboratory of Breast Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin Medical University, Ministry of Education, Tianjin, China.,Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Treatment of Tianjin, Tianjin, China.,Tianjin Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin, China.,The Sino-Russian Joint Research Center for Oncoplastic Breast Surgery, Tianjin, China
| | - J Liu
- The Department of Breast Oncoplastic Surgery, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, Tianjin 300060, China.,National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin, China.,Key Laboratory of Breast Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin Medical University, Ministry of Education, Tianjin, China.,Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Treatment of Tianjin, Tianjin, China.,Tianjin Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin, China.,The Sino-Russian Joint Research Center for Oncoplastic Breast Surgery, Tianjin, China
| | - C Han
- The Department of Breast Oncoplastic Surgery, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, Tianjin 300060, China.,National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin, China.,Key Laboratory of Breast Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin Medical University, Ministry of Education, Tianjin, China.,Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Treatment of Tianjin, Tianjin, China.,Tianjin Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin, China.,The Sino-Russian Joint Research Center for Oncoplastic Breast Surgery, Tianjin, China
| | - Z Yin
- The Department of Breast Oncoplastic Surgery, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, Tianjin 300060, China.,National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin, China.,Key Laboratory of Breast Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin Medical University, Ministry of Education, Tianjin, China.,Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Treatment of Tianjin, Tianjin, China.,Tianjin Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin, China.,The Sino-Russian Joint Research Center for Oncoplastic Breast Surgery, Tianjin, China
| | - B Ding
- The Department of Breast Oncoplastic Surgery, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, Tianjin 300060, China.,National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin, China.,Key Laboratory of Breast Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin Medical University, Ministry of Education, Tianjin, China.,Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Treatment of Tianjin, Tianjin, China.,Tianjin Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin, China.,The Sino-Russian Joint Research Center for Oncoplastic Breast Surgery, Tianjin, China
| | - J Yin
- The Department of Breast Oncoplastic Surgery, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, Tianjin 300060, China.,National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin, China.,Key Laboratory of Breast Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin Medical University, Ministry of Education, Tianjin, China.,Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Treatment of Tianjin, Tianjin, China.,Tianjin Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin, China.,The Sino-Russian Joint Research Center for Oncoplastic Breast Surgery, Tianjin, China
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Yin Z, Wang Y, Sun J, Huang Q, Liu J, He S, Han C, Wang S, Ding B, Yin J. Association of sociodemographic and oncological features with decision on implant-based versus autologous immediate postmastectomy breast reconstruction in Chinese patients. Cancer Med 2019; 8:2223-2232. [PMID: 30950238 PMCID: PMC6536967 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.2133] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2019] [Revised: 02/13/2019] [Accepted: 03/08/2019] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Background and objectives Immediate postmastectomy breast reconstruction (IPBR) has gained wide popularity in China. We sought to clarify the prevalence and predictors of implant‐based vs autologous IPBR among Chinese patients. Methods A retrospective cohort study was performed using a prospectively maintained database. Women who underwent IPBR during 2001‐2017 were included. The modality‐specific trends were deciphered by curve fitting analysis. The association of sociodemographic and oncological features with the decision for implant‐based vs autologous IPBR was investigated using multivariate logistic regression and structural equation modeling. Results Among 905 patients included in the study, 479 underwent implant‐based IPBR and 426 underwent autologous procedures. The implant/autologous ratio has increased exponentially over time. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that unmarried patients with BMI ≤ 24 kg/m2, earlier clinical tumor stage, and preoperative pathological diagnosis of noninvasive lesion are more likely to choose implant‐based IPBR compared to autologous procedures. The indirect effects of age, mastectomy type, and neoadjuvant chemotherapy were further demonstrated by the structural equations. Conclusions The sociodemographic and oncological features are directly or indirectly associated with the decision on type of IPBR. The findings may facilitate both patients and physicians to make a high‐quality decision by holistic evaluation of the sociodemographic and oncological features.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhuming Yin
- Department of Breast Oncoplastic Surgery, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, Tianjin, China.,National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin, China.,Key Laboratory of Breast Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin Medical University, Ministry of Education, Tianjin, China.,Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin, China.,Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin, China.,Sino-Russian Joint Research Center for Oncoplastic Breast Surgery, Tianjin, China
| | - Yan Wang
- Department of Breast Oncoplastic Surgery, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, Tianjin, China.,National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin, China.,Key Laboratory of Breast Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin Medical University, Ministry of Education, Tianjin, China.,Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin, China.,Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin, China.,Sino-Russian Joint Research Center for Oncoplastic Breast Surgery, Tianjin, China
| | - Jingyan Sun
- Department of Breast Oncoplastic Surgery, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, Tianjin, China.,National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin, China.,Key Laboratory of Breast Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin Medical University, Ministry of Education, Tianjin, China.,Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin, China.,Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin, China.,Sino-Russian Joint Research Center for Oncoplastic Breast Surgery, Tianjin, China
| | - Qingfeng Huang
- Department of Breast Oncoplastic Surgery, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, Tianjin, China.,National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin, China.,Key Laboratory of Breast Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin Medical University, Ministry of Education, Tianjin, China.,Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin, China.,Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin, China.,Sino-Russian Joint Research Center for Oncoplastic Breast Surgery, Tianjin, China
| | - Jing Liu
- Department of Breast Oncoplastic Surgery, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, Tianjin, China.,National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin, China.,Key Laboratory of Breast Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin Medical University, Ministry of Education, Tianjin, China.,Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin, China.,Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin, China.,Sino-Russian Joint Research Center for Oncoplastic Breast Surgery, Tianjin, China
| | - Shanshan He
- Department of Breast Oncoplastic Surgery, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, Tianjin, China.,National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin, China.,Key Laboratory of Breast Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin Medical University, Ministry of Education, Tianjin, China.,Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin, China.,Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin, China.,Sino-Russian Joint Research Center for Oncoplastic Breast Surgery, Tianjin, China
| | - Chunyong Han
- Department of Breast Oncoplastic Surgery, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, Tianjin, China.,National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin, China.,Key Laboratory of Breast Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin Medical University, Ministry of Education, Tianjin, China.,Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin, China.,Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin, China.,Sino-Russian Joint Research Center for Oncoplastic Breast Surgery, Tianjin, China
| | - Shu Wang
- Department of Breast Oncoplastic Surgery, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, Tianjin, China.,National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin, China.,Key Laboratory of Breast Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin Medical University, Ministry of Education, Tianjin, China.,Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin, China.,Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin, China.,Sino-Russian Joint Research Center for Oncoplastic Breast Surgery, Tianjin, China
| | - Bowen Ding
- Department of Breast Oncoplastic Surgery, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, Tianjin, China.,National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin, China.,Key Laboratory of Breast Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin Medical University, Ministry of Education, Tianjin, China.,Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin, China.,Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin, China.,Sino-Russian Joint Research Center for Oncoplastic Breast Surgery, Tianjin, China
| | - Jian Yin
- Department of Breast Oncoplastic Surgery, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, Tianjin, China.,National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin, China.,Key Laboratory of Breast Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin Medical University, Ministry of Education, Tianjin, China.,Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin, China.,Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin, China.,Sino-Russian Joint Research Center for Oncoplastic Breast Surgery, Tianjin, China
| |
Collapse
|