Comparison of efficacy, safety, and costs between neoadjuvant hypofractionated radiotherapy and conventionally fractionated radiotherapy for esophageal carcinoma

Comparison of the treatment outcomes of different neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy regimens for resectable locally advanced esophageal cancer

BACKGROUND

Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) followed by radical esophagectomy is the standard treatment for locally advanced esophageal squamous cell cancer (LA-ESCC). However, various nCRT regimens have been used and their comparative efficacy and safety remain unclear.

METHODS

Patients with histologically confirmed LA-ESCC who underwent nCRT followed by radical esophagectomy between January 2016 and February 2022 were enrolled in our study. Three different nCRT regimens were retrospectively compared: Conventional radiotherapy (RT) + cisplatin/5-fluorouracil (FP) (Conv-FP), hypofractionated RT + FP (Hypo-FP), and regimens from the CROSS trial (CROSS). The overall survival (OS), pathological complete response (pCR) rates, toxicities, and treatment compliance were analyzed.

RESULTS

Among the 600 patients, 225 received Conv-FP, 255 received Hypo-FP, and 120 received the CROSS regimen. OS at 1 year were 78.7%, 83.9%, and 88.1% in the Conv-FP, Hypo-FP, and CROSS groups, respectively (p < 0.001). The pCR rates were 30.6%, 33.9%, and 35.0%, respectively (p = 0.653). The overall incidence of grade 3 toxicities was 10.2%. Hematologic and non-hematologic toxicities of grade ≥ 3 were observed in 8.4% and 11.4%, 0% and 7.6%, 5.5% and 0.8% in Conv-FP, Hypo-FP, and CROSS, respectively (p = 0.002 and 0.030). Weight loss > 5% was observed in 44.0%, 51.4%, and 32.5%, respectively (p < 0.001). In the multivariate analysis, clinical T-stage (p = 0.004), N-stage (p = 0.012), the use of FP chemotherapy regimen (p = 0.013), surgical resection (p < 0.001), hematologic toxicity (p = 0.001), and weight loss (p = 0.004) were significantly associated with poor OS.

CONCLUSION

The choice of nCRT regimen did not significantly affect the pCR rates in patients with LA-ESCC. However, the CROSS regimen demonstrated better OS and lower toxicity, suggesting it may be the optimal treatment option among the groups.

SYNOPSIS

This study compared three different neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) regimens for locally advanced esophageal squamous cell cancer (LA-ESCC): Conventional radiotherapy (RT) + cisplatin/5-fluorouracil (FP), hypofractionated RT + FP, and regimens from the CROSS trial. The overall survival (OS), pathological complete response (pCR) rates, toxicities, and treatment compliance were analyzed. Results showed that the choice of nCRT regimen did not significantly affect pCR rates, but the CROSS regimen showed better OS and lower toxicity, suggesting it may be the optimal treatment option.

DATA AVAILABILITY

Data availability is limited due to institutional data protection law and confidentiality of patient data.

Electronic patient-reported outcome-based surveillance system to evaluate safety and efficacy of preoperative immunochemotherapy with or without short-term chemoradiation in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ePRO-PICCRT): protocol for a prospective, single-arm, phase II study

Background

Radiation-associated adverse events (ADEs) in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) remain a problem. Recent research has focused on reducing radiation-associated ADEs while maintaining efficacy, particularly through the combination of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) with chemotherapy. Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) have also emerged as reliable measures for monitoring treatment effectiveness and quality of life (QoL). This trial aims to investigate the feasibility of using patient-reported dysphagia relief to assess pathological response following neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy, as well as the safety and efficacy of neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy combined with short-course radiotherapy for patients with locally advanced ESCC.

Methods

This study is designed as a prospective, single-arm, phase II study. Eligible ESCC patients will be invited to participate in this study. All participants will receive paclitaxel (albumin-bound) (260 mg/m2, day 1), carboplatin [area under the curve (AUC) 5; 5 mg/mL/min, day 1] or cisplatin [60 mg/m2, intravenous drip (ivdrip), day 1], and tislelizumab (200 mg, day 1) in the first treatment cycle. Early remission of dysphagia is defined as relief greater than 70% according to the dysphagia symptom score in the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire esophagus-specific questionnaire (EORTC OES-18). The early remission group (Group A) will continue with the same regimen for two treatment cycles. The latent remission group will continue with one treatment cycle followed by neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy combined with short-course radiotherapy (radiotherapy 30 Gy/10 F). The primary objective is the pathological complete response (pCR) rate. Research data collection, storage, and management will be conducted in a web-based Real-World-Data Management Platform (RWDMP). Longitudinal data will be conducted by a linear mixed model with treatment effects, baseline factors influencing the endpoint as fixed effects, and the center as a random effect.

Discussion

This study will provide evidence for using patient-reported dysphagia relief to evaluate pathological response after neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy in early remission (Group A) and to evaluate the safety and efficacy of combining immunochemotherapy with short-course radiotherapy in latent remission (Group B) among patients with ESCC. Limitations include the single-arm study design, small sample size, and the need for further exploration of the specific mechanism and mediator of early dysphagia remission's effect on immunochemotherapy effectiveness.

Trial Registration

This study is registered at Clinicaltrials.gov (NCT05596890).

Systematic Review of Hypofractionated Radiation Therapy for the Treatment of Oesophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma and Oesophageal Adenocarcinoma

BACKGROUND AND AIM

There has been limited progress made in improving the suboptimal outcomes delivered by conventionally fractionated radiotherapy (RT) for oesophageal adenocarcinoma (OAC) and squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC). A greater biological effect may be achieved using hypofractionated RT (HFRT), though the toxicity, tolerability and efficacy of this approach in OAC and OSCC is uncertain.

METHODS

A systematic literature review was carried out in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews guidance. Medline, EMBASE, PubMed, Cochrane, CINAHL, Scopus and Web of Science databases were searched for terms relating to HFRT (>2.4Gy per fraction) for OAC or OSCC. All relevant clinical studies published between January 2000 and April 2023 were included. Study quality was assessed using predefined criteria.

RESULTS

Ninety-six studies were screened and 20 subsequently included, together incorporating 1208 patients. Fourteen studies focussed on neoadjuvant or definitive treatment. These were predominantly retrospective (n = 10, 71%) though two (n = 2, 14%) early phase trials were identified. Most focussed on OSCC (n = 7, 47%) or mixed OSCC/OAC (n = 6, 43%) populations. Four (28.6%) included a conventionally fractionated chemoradiotherapy (CRT) comparator, against which median overall (mOS) and progression free survival outcomes from HFRT did not differ. Reported mOS for HFRT ranged between 29-36 months at 2.5-3.125Gy per fraction (total dose 50-60Gy) for OAC and OSCC combined. Toxicity and tolerability with HFRT was comparable with conventionally fractionated CRT up to, but not exceeding, 5Gy. Three (50%) of the six palliative-intent studies were early phase trials and most (n = 4, 67%) focussed on OAC and OSCC. Response rates with HFRT in the palliative setting were 63.6-88.0%.

CONCLUSION

These data provide evidence in OAC/OSCC for promising efficacy and an acceptable toxicity profile for moderately HFRT, alone or with concurrent chemotherapy. These data should prompt prospective, randomised comparisons of HFRT and conventionally fractionated CRT and single-modality RT schedules.

REGISTRATION DETAILS

PROSPERO; CRD42023457791.

Validity of Using Pathological Response as a Surrogate for Overall Survival in Neoadjuvant Studies for Esophageal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Pathological response is a critical factor in predicting long-term survival of patients with esophageal cancer after preoperative therapy. However, the validity of using pathological response as a surrogate for overall survival (OS) for esophageal cancer has not yet been established. In this study, a literature-based meta-analysis was conducted to evaluate pathological response as a proxy endpoint for survival in esophageal cancer.

METHODS

Three databases were systematically searched to identify relevant studies investigating neoadjuvant treatment for esophageal cancer. The correlation between pathological complete response (pCR) and OS were assessed using a weighted multiple regression analysis at the trial level, and the coefficient of determination (R2) was calculated. The research design and histological subtypes were considered in the performance of subgroup analysis.

RESULTS

In this meta-analysis, a total of 40 trials, comprising 43 comparisons and 55,344 patients were qualified. The surrogacy between pCR and OS was moderate (R2 = 0.238 in direct comparison, R2 = 0.500 for pCR reciprocals, R2 = 0.541 in log settings). pCR could not serve as an ideal surrogate endpoint in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) (R2 = 0.511 in direct comparison, R2 = 0.460 for pCR reciprocals, R2 = 0.523 in log settings). A strong correlation was observed in studies comparing neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and neoadjuvant chemotherapy (R2 = 0.595 in direct comparison, R2 = 0.840 for pCR reciprocals, R2 = 0.800 in log settings).

CONCLUSIONS

A lack of surrogacy of pathological response for long-term survival at trial level is established in this study. Hence, caution should be exercised when using pCR as the primary endpoint in neoadjuvant studies for esophageal cancer.

Impact of outpatient radiotherapy on direct non-medical cost in patients in the Central Macro Region of Peru 2021

Background

Financial toxicity arises in cancer patients due to the objective financial burden of the disease or treatment, being associated with worse clinical outcomes. Direct non-medical spending on cancer patients undergoing radiotherapy in Peru under its publicly funded health system has not been described.

Objective

To know the expenses related to the transfer of the radiotherapy outpatient.

Methodology

For patients who started radiation therapy in 2021, treatment demographics and expenses related to transporting the patient from home to the radiation therapy center were prospectively collected. Association and connection tests were used, such as the Mann-Whitney/Kruskal-Wallis U-test and Spearman's Rho. A value of p < 0.05 is considered statistically significant.

Results

398 patients were collected, with average weekly expenses for transportation, lodging and food of $17.04, $6.69 and $45.91, respectively. Confirmation was positive between weekly spending and remoteness, likewise it was negative between effective teletherapy and remoteness, both analyses being statistically significant.

Conclusion

The expense associated with transfer for radiotherapy is high, exceeding the average monthly income of the patient, as a consequence they have a worse therapeutic result, and may cause financial toxicity in cancer patients.

Impact of radiotherapy on the immune landscape in oesophageal adenocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

In the contemporary era of cancer immunotherapy, an abundance of clinical and translational studies have reported radiotherapy (RT) and immunotherapies as a viable option for immunomodulation of many cancer subtypes, with many related clinical trials ongoing. In locally advanced disease, chemotherapy or chemoradiotherapy followed by surgical excision of the tumour remain the principal treatment strategy in oesophageal adenocarcinoma (OAC), however, the use of the host immune system to improve anti-tumour immunity is rapidly garnering increased support in the curative setting.

AIM

To immunophenotype OAC patients’ immune checkpoint (IC) expression with and without radiation and evaluate the effects of checkpoint blockade on cell viability.

METHODS

In the contemporary era of cancer immunotherapy, an abundance of studies have demonstrated that combination RT and IC inhibitors (ICIs) are effective in the immunomodulation of many cancer subtypes, with many related clinical trials ongoing. Although surgical excision and elimination of tumour cells by chemotherapy or chemoradiotherapy remains the gold standard approach in OAC, the propagation of anti-tumour immune responses is rapidly garnering increased support in the curative setting. The aim of this body of work was to immunophenotype OAC patients’ IC expression with and without radiation and to establish the impact of checkpoint blockade on cell viability. This study was a hybrid combination of in vitro and ex vivo models. Quantification of serum immune proteins was performed by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Flow cytometry staining was performed to evaluate IC expression for in vitro OAC cell lines and ex vivo OAC biopsies. Cell viability in the presence of radiation with and without IC blockade was assessed by a cell counting kit-8 assay.

RESULTS

We identified that conventional dosing and hypofractionated approaches resulted in increased IC expression (PD-1, PD-L1, TIM3, TIGIT) in vitro and ex vivo in OAC. There were two distinct subcohorts with one demonstrating significant upregulation of ICs and the contrary in the other cohort. Increasing IC expression post RT was associated with a more aggressive tumour phenotype and adverse features of tumour biology. The use of anti-PD-1 and anti-PD-L1 immunotherapies in combination with radiation resulted in a significant and synergistic reduction in viability of both radiosensitive and radioresistant OAC cells in vitro. Interleukin-21 (IL-21) and IL-31 significantly increased, with a concomitant reduction in IL-23 as a consequence of 4 Gray radiation. Similarly, radiation induced an anti-angiogenic tumour milieu with reduced expression of vascular endothelial growth factor-A, basic fibroblast growth factor, Flt-1 and placental growth factor.

CONCLUSION

The findings of the current study demonstrate synergistic potential for the use of ICIs and ionising radiation to potentiate established anti-tumour responses in the neoadjuvant setting and is of particular interest in those with advanced disease, adverse features of tumour biology and poor treatment responses to conventional therapies.

Outcomes and Tolerability of Definitive and Preoperative Chemoradiation in Elderly Patients With Esophageal Cancer: A Retrospective Institutional Review

Purpose

Our purpose was to report outcomes of elderly patients who underwent definitive treatment involving radiation therapy for esophageal cancer at our institution.

Methods and Materials

We performed a retrospective review of patients aged ≥75 years with esophageal cancer treated with definitive radiation therapy (≥45 Gy) at our institution from 1997 to 2019. Acute and late Radiation Therapy Oncology Group grade 3+ toxicities were recorded. Survival was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method.

Results

Of the 89 patients included, median age was 80 and 78% were male. Median adjusted Charlson Comorbidity Index and Karnofsky Performance Status were 5 (3-12) and 80 (50-100), respectively. The majority of cancers were adenocarcinoma (58%), distal (67%), and stage III (62%). Fifty-eight percent underwent definitive chemoradiotherapy, and one-third underwent preoperative intent chemoradiotherapy. Median prescribed dose was 50 Gy (45-66 Gy), and intensity modulated radiation therapy was used in 76%. Eighty-five percent completed the radiation therapy course. Among these, 20% had radiation therapy breaks. For those receiving concurrent chemotherapy, 37% had a dose reduction and 39.5% had a break/cycle reduction. Acute grade 3+ toxicity was 22%, with 2% grade 5 toxicity. Twenty-one of the 29 patients (72%) treated with preoperative intent underwent surgery. There were no deaths 90 days postoperatively. For patients who underwent surgery, 1- and 2-year overall survival were 95% and 84%. For those who did not undergo surgery, 1- and 2-year overall survival were 70% and 52%.

Conclusions

There is a role for aggressive radiation therapy in well-selected elderly patients with esophageal cancer. However, optimization of supportive care, chemotherapy regimens, radiation therapy dose/fractionation, and surgical indications are needed to reduce toxicity.

Comparison of efficacy, safety, and costs between neoadjuvant hypofractionated radiotherapy and conventionally fractionated radiotherapy for esophageal carcinoma

Background

We compared the efficacy, safety, and costs of hypofractionated radiotherapy (HFRT) and conventional fractionated radiotherapy (CFRT) for the neoadjuvant treatment of esophageal cancer.

Materials and Methods

Overall, 110 patients with esophageal cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy from October 2002 to July 2017 were retrospectively included and divided into a HFRT group (42 patients received 30 Gray [Gy]/10 fractions for 2 weeks) and a CFRT group [68 patients received 40 Gy/20 fractions for 4 weeks]. Concurrent chemotherapy comprised cisplatin combined with either 5‐FU or taxane. Surgery was performed 3‐8 weeks after radiotherapy. We compared the outcomes, adverse events, and costs between the two groups.

Results

Pathological downstaging was achieved in 78.6% of the HFRT group and 83.8% of the CFRT group (P = 0.612). Compared with the CFRT group, the HFRT group had similar pathological complete response (pCR) (33.3% vs 35.3%; P = 0.834), median overall survival (OS) (40.8 months vs 44.9 months; P = 0.772) and progression free survival (32.7 months vs 35.4 months; P = 0.785). The perioperative complication rates were also similar between the groups, but the treatment time and costs were significantly reduced in the HFRT group (P < 0.05). Finally, multivariate analysis identified cN0 stage, pathological downstaging and pCR as independent predictors of better OS.

Conclusion

Preoperative HFRT is effective and safe for esophageal cancer. Moreover, it is similar to CFRT in terms of overall survival and toxicity and is cost effective and less time consuming.