1
|
Ozkaya M, Simsekoglu MF, Kalender G, Sahin KC, Gurses I. Clinical and histopathological parameters in transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsies associated with tumor upgrading after radical prostatectomy: A comparative analysis of risk groups. Prostate 2024; 84:1146-1156. [PMID: 38798171 DOI: 10.1002/pros.24751] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/28/2023] [Revised: 03/15/2024] [Accepted: 05/13/2024] [Indexed: 05/29/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Thanks to technological advances, prostate cancer (PCa) can be diagnosed at a younger age. It is known that most of these patients are in the low-intermediate risk group, and the histological grade of the tumor increases in half of those undergoing radical prostatectomy (Rp) compared to their diagnostic biopsies. This is especially important in terms of active surveillance (AS) and/or the timely evaluation of curative treatment options in patients diagnosed at an early age. Our aim was to investigate clinical and histopathological parameters that may be associated with an increase in the histological grade of the tumor in patients with acinar adenocarcinoma who were diagnosed by transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy (TRUS-Bx) and underwent Rp. METHODS A total of 205 patients with classical acinar adenocarcinoma diagnosed by TRUS-Bx without metastasis and who underwent Rp were grouped according to the D'Amico risk classification. Age at diagnosis, serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA), PSA density, prostate volume, Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) score, clinical stage, Gleason Grade Group (GGG), high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia in tumor-free cores (HGPIN) (single and ≥2 cores), perineural invasion (PNI), and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was obtained. Additionally, GGG, pathological stage, lymph node metastasis, surgical margin positivity, and tumor volume obtained from Rp were evaluated. Comparisons were made between the case groups in which the tumor grade increased and remained the same, in terms of age, serum PSA, PSA density, HGPIN in tumor-free cores (single and ≥2 cores), PNI, and LVI in all biopsies (with or without tumors), as well as risk groups. In addition, the relationships of HGPIN in tumor-free cores (single and ≥2 cores), PNI, and LVI on TRUS-Bx with age, serum PSA and PSA density, tumor volume, surgical margin positivity, pathological stage, lymph node metastasis, and risk groups were examined separately. RESULTS Of the patients, 72 (35.1%) were in the low-risk group, 95 (46.3%) in the intermediate-risk group, and 38 (18.5%) in the high-risk group. Most of the patients with an increased histological grade (n = 38, 48.1%) were in the low-risk group (p < 0.05) and had an advanced median age. HGPIN in single and ≥2 tumor-free cores and PNI were more common in these patients (p < 0.01, p < 0.001, and p < 0.05, respectively). According to the multivariable analysis, advanced age (odds ratio [OR]: 1.087, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.029-1.148, p < 0.05), high serum PSA (OR: 1.047, 95% CI: 1.006-1.090, p < 0.05), HGPIN in ≥2 tumor-free cores (OR: 6.346, 95% CI: 3.136-12.912, p < 0.001), and PNI (OR: 3.138, 95% CI: 1.179-8.356, p < 0.05) were independent risk factors for a tumor upgrade. Furthermore, being in the low-risk group was an independent risk factor when compared to the intermediate- and high-risk groups (OR: 0.187, 95% CI: 0.080-0.437, p < 0.001 and OR: 0.054, 95% CI: 0.013-0.230, p < 0.001, respectively). The HGPIN diagnosis was more common in the low- and intermediate-risk groups. Advanced age at diagnosis, high serum PSA and PSA density values were associated with PNI on TRUS-Bx. High serum PSA and PSA density values were associated with LVI on TRUS-Bx. Surgical margin positivity was higher in cases with PNI and LVI detected by TRUS-Bx. HGPIN in ≥2 tumor-free cores, PNI, and LVI on TRUS-Bx were associated with a higher rate of lymph node metastases. CONCLUSIONS In patients diagnosed with acinar adenocarcinoma, the presence of HGPIN even in a single tumor-free core on TRUS-Bx was found to be significant in terms of showing an increase in the histological tumor grade in Rp. The diagnosis of HGPIN in ≥2 tumor-free cores on TRUS-Bx was determined as an independent risk factor for an increased Gleason score after Rp. Furthermore, an advanced age, a high serum PSA value, being in the low-risk group, and the presence of PNI were associated with a tumor upgrade. HGPIN in ≥2 tumor-free cores, PNI, and LVI were also associated with lymph node metastasis. Therefore, the diagnosis of HGPIN should be signed out on pathological reports.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mustafa Ozkaya
- Department of Urology, Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa, Cerrahpasa School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Muhammed Fatih Simsekoglu
- Department of Urology, Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa, Cerrahpasa School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Goktug Kalender
- Department of Urology, Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa, Cerrahpasa School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Kadir Can Sahin
- Department of Urology, Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa, Cerrahpasa School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Iclal Gurses
- Department of Pathology, Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa, Cerrahpasa School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Wu S, Jiang Y, Liang Z, Chen S, Sun G, Ma S, Chen K, Liu R. Comprehensive analysis of predictive factors for upstaging in intraprostatic cancer after radical prostatectomy: Different patterns of spread exist in lesions at different locations. Cancer Med 2023; 12:17776-17787. [PMID: 37537798 PMCID: PMC10524000 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.6401] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/08/2023] [Revised: 07/14/2023] [Accepted: 07/22/2023] [Indexed: 08/05/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Accurate assessment of the clinical staging is crucial for determining the need for radical prostatectomy (RP) in prostate cancer (PCa). However, the current methods for PCa staging may yield incorrect results. This study aimed to comprehensively analyze independent predictors of postoperative upstaging of intraprostatic cancer. METHODS We conducted a retrospective analysis of data from intraprostatic cancer patients who underwent radical surgery between March 2019 and December 2022. Intraprostatic cancer was defined as a lesion confined to the prostate, excluding cases where multiparameter magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) showed the lesion in contact with the prostatic capsule. We assessed independent predictors of extraprostatic extension (EPE) and analyzed their association with positive surgical margin (PSM) status. In addition, based on the distance of the lesion from the capsule on mpMRI, we divided the patients into non-transition zone and transition zone groups for further analysis. RESULTS A total of 500 patients were included in our study. Logistic regression analysis revealed that biopsy Gleason grade group (GG) (odds ratio, OR: 1.370, 95% confidence interval, CI: 1.093-1.718) and perineural invasion (PNI) (OR: 2.746, 95% CI: 1.420-5.309) were predictive factors for postoperative EPE. Both biopsy GG and PNI were associated with lateral (GG: OR: 1.270, 95% CI: 1.074-1.501; PNI: OR: 2.733, 95% CI: 1.521-4.911) and basal (GG: OR: 1.491, 95% CI: 1.194-1.862; PNI: OR: 3.730, 95% CI: 1.929-7.214) PSM but not with apex PSM (GG: OR: 1.176, 95% CI: 0.989-1.399; PNI: OR: 1.204, 95% CI: 0.609-2.381) after RP. Finally, PNI was an independent predictor of EPE in the transition zone (OR: 11.235, 95% CI: 2.779-45.428) but not in the non-transition zone (OR: 1.942, 95% CI: 0.920-4.098). CONCLUSION PNI and higher GG may indicate upstaging of tumors in patients with intraprostatic carcinoma. These two factors are associated with PSM in locations other than the apex of the prostate. Importantly, cancer in the transition zone of the prostate is more likely to spread externally through nerve invasion than cancer in the non-transition zone.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shangrong Wu
- Department of UrologyThe Second Hospital of Tianjin Medical UniversityTianjinChina
- Tianjin Institute of UrologyTianjinChina
| | - Yuchen Jiang
- Department of UrologyThe Second Hospital of Tianjin Medical UniversityTianjinChina
- Tianjin Institute of UrologyTianjinChina
| | - Zhengxin Liang
- Department of UrologyThe Second Hospital of Tianjin Medical UniversityTianjinChina
- Tianjin Institute of UrologyTianjinChina
| | - Shuaiqi Chen
- Department of UrologyThe Second Hospital of Tianjin Medical UniversityTianjinChina
- Tianjin Institute of UrologyTianjinChina
| | - Guangyu Sun
- Department of UrologyThe Second Hospital of Tianjin Medical UniversityTianjinChina
- Tianjin Institute of UrologyTianjinChina
| | - Shenfei Ma
- Department of UrologyThe Second Hospital of Tianjin Medical UniversityTianjinChina
- Tianjin Institute of UrologyTianjinChina
| | - Kaifei Chen
- Department of UrologyThe Second Hospital of Tianjin Medical UniversityTianjinChina
- Tianjin Institute of UrologyTianjinChina
| | - Ranlu Liu
- Department of UrologyThe Second Hospital of Tianjin Medical UniversityTianjinChina
- Tianjin Institute of UrologyTianjinChina
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Wang J, Yang Z, Liu Y, Li H, Yang X, Gao W, Zhao Q, Yang X, Wei J. The GAL/GALR2 axis promotes the perineural invasion of salivary adenoid cystic carcinoma via epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition. Cancer Med 2023; 12:4496-4509. [PMID: 36039037 PMCID: PMC9972115 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.5181] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/04/2022] [Revised: 08/11/2022] [Accepted: 08/12/2022] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Perineural invasion (PNI) is a typical pathological characteristic of salivary adenoid cystic carcinoma (SACC) and other neurotrophic cancers. The mechanism of the neural microenvironment controlling tumor progression during the PNI process is unclear. In the present study, we investigated the role and molecular mechanisms of nerve-derived neuropeptide galanin (GAL) and its receptor (GALR2) in the regulation of PNI in SACC. METHODS Immunohistochemistry staining and clinical association studies were performed to analyze the expression of GAL and GALR2 in SACC tissues and their clinical value. Dorsal root ganglion or SH-SY5Y cells were co-cultured with SACC cells in vitro to simulate the interactions between the neural microenvironment and tumor cells, and a series of assays including transcriptome sequencing, Western blot, and Transwell were performed to investigate the role and molecular mechanism of GAL and GALR2 in the regulation of SACC cells. Moreover, both the in vitro and in vivo PNI models were established to assess the potential PNI-specific therapeutic effects by blocking the GAL/GALR2 axis. RESULTS GAL and GALR2 were highly expressed in SACC tissues, and were associated with PNI and poor prognosis in SACC patients (p < 0.05). Nerve-derived GAL activated GALR2 expression in SACC cells and induced epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT) in SACC cells. Adding human recombinant GAL to the co-culture system promoted the proliferation, migration, and invasion of SACC cells significantly, but inhibited the apoptosis of SACC cells. Adding M871, a specific antagonist of GALR2, significantly blocked the above effects (p < 0.05) and inhibited the PNI of SACC cells in vitro and in vivo (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS This study demonstrated that nerve-derived GAL activated GALR2 expression, and promoted EMT in SACC cells, thereby enhancing the PNI process. Interruption of the GAL/GALR2 axis might be a novel strategy for anti-PNI therapy for SACC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jun Wang
- State Key Laboratory of Military Stomatology and National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases, and Shaanxi Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Stomatology, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, China
| | - Zihui Yang
- State Key Laboratory of Military Stomatology and National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases, and Shaanxi Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Stomatology, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, China
| | - Yuanyang Liu
- Senior Department of Neurosurgery, First Medical Center, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Huan Li
- State Key Laboratory of Military Stomatology and National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases, and Shaanxi Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Stomatology, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, China
| | - Xiangming Yang
- State Key Laboratory of Military Stomatology and National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases, and Shaanxi Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Stomatology, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, China
| | - Wanpeng Gao
- State Key Laboratory of Military Stomatology and National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases, and Shaanxi Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Stomatology, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, China
| | - Qi Zhao
- State Key Laboratory of Military Stomatology and National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases, and Shaanxi Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Stomatology, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, China
| | - Xinjie Yang
- State Key Laboratory of Military Stomatology and National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases, and Shaanxi Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Stomatology, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, China
| | - Jianhua Wei
- State Key Laboratory of Military Stomatology and National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases, and Shaanxi Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Stomatology, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, China
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Egevad L, Delahunt B, Samaratunga H, Tsuzuki T, Olsson H, Ström P, Lindskog C, Häkkinen T, Kartasalo K, Eklund M, Ruusuvuori P. Interobserver reproducibility of perineural invasion of prostatic adenocarcinoma in needle biopsies. Virchows Arch 2021; 478:1109-1116. [PMID: 33534005 PMCID: PMC8203540 DOI: 10.1007/s00428-021-03039-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/08/2020] [Revised: 01/15/2021] [Accepted: 01/20/2021] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
Numerous studies have shown a correlation between perineural invasion (PNI) in prostate biopsies and outcome. The reporting of PNI varies widely in the literature. While the interobserver variability of prostate cancer grading has been studied extensively, less is known regarding the reproducibility of PNI. A total of 212 biopsy cores from a population-based screening trial were included in this study (106 with and 106 without PNI according to the original pathology reports). The glass slides were scanned and circulated among four pathologists with a special interest in urological pathology for assessment of PNI. Discordant cases were stained by immunohistochemistry for S-100 protein. PNI was diagnosed by all four observers in 34.0% of cases, while 41.5% were considered to be negative for PNI. In 24.5% of cases, there was a disagreement between the observers. The kappa for interobserver variability was 0.67–0.75 (mean 0.73). The observations from one participant were compared with data from the original reports, and a kappa for intraobserver variability of 0.87 was achieved. Based on immunohistochemical findings among discordant cases, 88.6% had PNI while 11.4% did not. The most common diagnostic pitfall was the presence of bundles of stroma or smooth muscle. It was noted in a few cases that collagenous micronodules could be mistaken for a nerve. The distance between cancer and nerve was another cause of disagreement. Although the results suggest that the reproducibility of PNI may be greater than that of prostate cancer grading, there is still a need for improvement and standardization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lars Egevad
- Department of Oncology and Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University Hospital, Radiumhemmet P1:02, 171 76, Stockholm, Sweden.
| | - Brett Delahunt
- Department of Pathology and Molecular Medicine, Wellington School of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Otago, Wellington, New Zealand
| | - Hemamali Samaratunga
- Aquesta Uropathology and University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Toyonori Tsuzuki
- Department of Surgical Pathology, Aichi Medical University, School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Henrik Olsson
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Peter Ström
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Cecilia Lindskog
- Department of Immunology, Genetics, and Pathology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Tomi Häkkinen
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland
- Tays Cancer Center, Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland
| | - Kimmo Kartasalo
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland
| | - Martin Eklund
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Pekka Ruusuvuori
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland
- Institute of Biomedicine, University of Turku, Turku, Finland
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Ramos N, Macedo A, Rosa J, Carvalho M. Perineural invasion in prostate needle biopsy: Prognostic value on radical prostatectomy and active surveillance. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2020; 92. [PMID: 33348961 DOI: 10.4081/aiua.2020.4.330] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/22/2020] [Accepted: 09/03/2020] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical impact of perineural invasion (PNI) in prostate biopsy in patients submitted to radical prostatectomy and on active surveillance (AS). MATERIALS AND METHODS We performed a single center, retrospective, cohort study on patients diagnosed with clinically localized prostate cancer and submitted to radical prostatectomy between January 2010 and December 2016. We evaluated clinical and anatomopathological characteristics from the biopsy and radical prostatectomy specimen and correlated with biochemical recurrence (BCR) using a survival analysis. We also evaluated the impact of PNI in patients with criteria for active surveillance. RESULTS The cohort analyzed consists of 107 patients, with a mean age of 63.1 years and a mean PSA prior to biopsy of 7.8 ng/ml. In prostate biopsy, 66.4% of the patients had a Gleason score of 6, 30.9% had a Gleason score of 7, and 2.7% had a Gleason score of 8 or higher, with PNI being detected in 57 (53.3%) of the patients. Regarding the anatomopathological characteristics of the surgical specimen, invasion of the seminal vesicles was observed in 6.5%, lymph nodes involvement in 9.3% and positive surgical margins in 27.1% of the cases. During follow-up, BCR was recorded in 24.3% of cases. Clinicopathological features were stratified according to the presence or absence of PNI, with statistical significance in relation to the Gleason Score (p = 0.001), pathologic T stage (p = 0.001), D'Amico risk (p = 0.002) and upstaging of the Gleason score (p = 0.045). The survival analysis revealed a relationship between PNI and BCR (hazard ratio = 2.98; 95% CI: 1.36-6.58; p = 0.007). Regarding the men potentially eligible for AS, the presence of PNI on the biopsy presented a significant relation with Gleason upgrade (p = 0.004) and extraprostatic extension (p = 0.017). CONCLUSIONS The presence of PNI in prostate biopsy is related to adverse anatomopathological factors, being a potential predictor of BCR and have a possible role in the selection of patients for AS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nuno Ramos
- Urology Department, Garcia de Orta Hospital, Almada.
| | | | - João Rosa
- Urology Department, Garcia de Orta Hospital, Almada.
| | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Barsky AR, Kraus RD, Carmona R, Santos PMG, Li C, Schwartz LE, Ballas LK, Vapiwala N. Investigating association of perineural invasion on prostate biopsy with Gleason score upgrading at prostatectomy: A multi-institutional analysis. Cancer Med 2020; 9:3383-3389. [PMID: 32187859 PMCID: PMC7221308 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.2920] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/03/2019] [Revised: 01/13/2020] [Accepted: 01/24/2020] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The significance of perineural invasion (PNI) in prostate cancer (PC) is unclear. A recent report of patients with pT2N0R0 PC found that PNI at prostatectomy was independently associated with higher Gleason score and more diffuse prostatic disease. We aimed to test our hypothesis that PNI on prostate biopsy in pT2N0R0 patients is associated with increased Gleason score upgrading at prostatectomy. Methods We identified 2892 patients status post prostatectomy with pT2N0R0 PC from three institutions, diagnosed between 1 January 2008 and 31 December 2014. Multivariable logistic regression (MVA) was used to evaluate the association between prostate biopsy PNI status and surgical Gleason upgrading, while controlling for potential confounders. Results Of the 2892 patients identified, 14% had PNI on biopsy, of whom 21% had surgical Gleason upgrading, while 28% without PNI on biopsy had such upgrading (P < .01). On MVA, the odds ratio (OR) of surgical Gleason upgrading for patients with biopsy PNI relative to patients without biopsy PNI was 0.69 (P < .01). The variables associated with surgical Gleason upgrading were age ≤60 years (OR 1.22, P = .02) and preoperative PSA >4 ng/mL (OR 1.26, P = .02). Conclusions In post‐prostatectomy patients with favorable‐risk PC, PNI on prostate biopsy was not associated with surgical Gleason score upgrading. This may be due to the association of PNI with more diffuse disease, leading to increased biopsy tumor yield and grading accuracy. These findings suggest that in this setting, biopsy PNI alone should not be a concern for more aggressive disease requiring pathologic confirmation or intervention. This may help guide treatment decision‐making for men debating active surveillance, radiation, and surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew R Barsky
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Perelman School of Medicine of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Ryan D Kraus
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Ruben Carmona
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Perelman School of Medicine of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Patricia M G Santos
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Carrie Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Perelman School of Medicine of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Lauren E Schwartz
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Leslie K Ballas
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Keck School of Medicine of University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Neha Vapiwala
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Perelman School of Medicine of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|