Comparison of gross target volumes based on four-dimensional CT, positron emission tomography-computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging in thoracic esophageal cancer

Automatic segmentation of the gross target volume in radiotherapy for lung cancer using transresSEUnet 2.5D Network

Objective

This paper intends to propose a method of using TransResSEUnet2.5D network for accurate automatic segmentation of the Gross Target Volume (GTV) in Radiotherapy for lung cancer.

Methods

A total of 11,370 computed tomograms (CT), deriving from 137 cases, of lung cancer patients under radiotherapy developed by radiotherapists were used as the training set; 1642 CT images in 20 cases were used as the validation set, and 1685 CT images in 20 cases were used as the test set. The proposed network was tuned and trained to obtain the best segmentation model and its performance was measured by the Dice Similarity Coefficient (DSC) and with 95% Hausdorff distance (HD95). Lastly, as to demonstrate the accuracy of the automatic segmentation of the network proposed in this study, all possible mirrors of the input images were put into Unet2D, Unet2.5D, Unet3D, ResSEUnet3D, ResSEUnet2.5D, and TransResUnet2.5D, and their respective segmentation performances were compared and assessed.

Results

The segmentation results of the test set showed that TransResSEUnet2.5D performed the best in the DSC (84.08 ± 0.04) %, HD95 (8.11 ± 3.43) mm and time (6.50 ± 1.31) s metrics compared to the other three networks.

Conclusions

The TransResSEUnet 2.5D proposed in this study can automatically segment the GTV of radiotherapy for lung cancer patients with more accuracy.

Geometrical Comparison and Quantitative Evaluation of 18F-FDG PET/CT- and DW-MRI-Based Target Delineation Before and During Radiotherapy for Esophageal Squamous Carcinoma

Background and Purpose

This study aimed to evaluate the geometrical differences in and metabolic parameters of ¹⁸F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography–computed tomography (¹⁸F-FDG PET-CT) and diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DW-MRI) performed before and during radiotherapy (RT) for patients with esophageal cancer based on the three-dimensional CT (3DCT) medium and explore whether the high signal area derived from DW-MRI can be used as a tool for an individualized definition of the volume in need of dose escalation for esophageal squamous cancer.

Materials and Methods

Thirty-two patients with esophageal squamous cancer sequentially underwent repeated 3DCT, ¹⁸F-FDG PET-CT, and enhanced MRI before the initiation of RT and after the 15th fraction. All images were fused with 3DCT images through deformable registration. The gross tumor volume (GTV) was delineated based on PET Edge on the first and second PET-CT images and defined as GTV_PETpre and GTV_PETdur, respectively. GTV_DWIpre and GTV_DWIdur were delineated on the first and second DWI and corresponding T₂-weighted MRI (T₂W-MRI)-fused images. The maximum, mean, and peak standardized uptake values (SUVs; SUV_max, SUV_mean, and SUV_peak, respectively); metabolic tumor volume (MTV); and total lesion glycolysis(TLG) and its relative changes were calculated automatically on PET. Similarly, the minimum and mean apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC; ADC_min and ADC_mean) and its relative changes were measured manually using ADC maps.

Results

The volume of GTV_CT exhibited a significant positive correlation with that of GTV_PET and GTV_DWI (both p < 0.001). Significant differences were observed in both ADCs and ¹⁸F-FDG PET metabolic parameters before and during RT (both p < 0.001). No significant correlation was observed between SUVs and ADCs before and during RT (p = 0.072–0.944) and between ∆ADCs and ∆SUVs (p = 0.238–0.854). The conformity index and degree of inclusion of GTV_PETpre to GTV_DWIpre were significantly higher than those of GTV_PETdur to GTV_DWIdur (both p < 0.001). The maximum diameter shrinkage rate (∆LD_DWI) (24%) and the tumor volume shrinkage rate (VRR_DWI) (60%) based on DW-MRI during RT were significantly greater than the corresponding PET-based ∆LD_PET (14%) and VRR_PET (41%) rates (p = 0.017 and 0.000, respectively).

Conclusion

Based on the medium of CT images, there are significant differences in spatial position, biometabolic characteristics, and the tumor shrinkage rate for GTVs derived from ¹⁸F-FDG PET-CT and DW-MRI before and during RT for esophageal squamous cancer. Further studies are needed to determine if DW-MRI will be used as tool for an individualized definition of the volume in need of dose escalation.

Comparison of gross target volumes based on four-dimensional CT, positron emission tomography-computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging in thoracic esophageal cancer

PURPOSE

The application value of ¹⁸ F-FDG PET-CT combined with MRI in the radiotherapy of esophageal carcinoma was discussed by comparing the differences in position, volume, and the length of GTVs delineated on the end-expiration (EE) phase of 4DCT, ¹⁸ F-FDG PET-CT, and T₂ W-MRI.

METHODS

A total of 26 patients with thoracic esophageal cancer sequentially performed 3DCT, 4DCT, ¹⁸ F-FDG PET-CT, and MRI simulation for thoracic localization. All images were fused with the 3DCT images by deformable registration. GTV_CT and GTV_50% were delineated on 3DCT and the EE phase of 4DCT images, respectively. The GTV based on PET-CT images was determined by thresholds of SUV ≥ 2.5 and designated as GTV_PET2.5 . The images of T₂ -weighted sequence and diffusion-weighted sequence were referred as GTV_MRI and GTV_DWI , respectively. The length of the abnormality seen on the 4DCT, PET-CT, and DWI was compared.

RESULTS

GTV_PET2.5 was significantly larger than GTV_50% and GTV_MRI (P = .000 and 0.008, respectively), and the volume of GTV_MRI was similar to that of GTV_50% (P = .439). Significant differences were observed between the CI of GTV_MRI to GTV_50% and GTV_PET2.5 to GTV_50% (P = .004). The CI of GTV_MRI to GTV_CT and GTV_PET2.5 to GTV_CT were statistically significant (P = .039). The CI of GTV_MRI to GTV_PET2.5 was significantly lower than that of GTV_MRI to GTV_50% , GTV_MRI to GTV_CT , GTV_PET2.5 to GTV_50% , and GTV_PET2.5 to GTV_CT (P = .000-0.021). Tumor length measurements by endoscopy were similar to the tumor length as measured by PET and DWI scan (P > .05), and there was no significant difference between the longitudinal length of GTV_PET2.5 and GTV_DWI (P = .072).

CONCLUSION

The volumes of GTV_MRI and GTV_50% were similar. However, GTV_MRI has different volumes and poor spatial matching compared with GTV_PET2.5 .The MRI imaging could not include entire respiration. It may be a good choice to guide target delineation and construction of esophageal carcinoma by combining 4DCT with MRI imaging. Utilization of DWI in treatment planning for esophageal cancer may provide further information to assist with target delineation. Further studies are needed to determine if this technology will translate into meaningful differences in clinical outcome.