Dual MGMT inactivation by promoter hypermethylation and loss of the long arm of chromosome 10 in glioblastoma

Prognostic and predictive biomarkers in central nervous system tumours: the molecular state of play

Central nervous system (CNS) tumours were one of the first cancer types to adopt and integrate molecular profiling into routine clinical diagnosis in 2016. The vast majority of these biomarkers, used to discriminate between tumour types, also offered prognostic information. With the advent of The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and other large genomic datasets, further prognostic sub-stratification was possible within tumour types, leading to increased precision in CNS tumour grading. This review outlines the evolution of the molecular landscape of adult CNS tumours, through the prism of World Health Organization (WHO) Classifications. We begin our journey in the pre-molecular era, where high-grade gliomas were divided into 'primary' and 'secondary' glioblastomas. Molecular alterations explaining these clinicopathological observations were the first branching points of glioma diagnostics, with the discovery of IDH1/2 mutations and 1p/19q codeletion. Subsequently, the rigorous characterisation of paediatric gliomas led to the unearthing of histone H3 alterations as a key event in gliomagenesis, which also had implications for young adult patients. Simultaneously, studies investigating prognostic biomarkers within tumour types were undertaken. Certain genomic phenotypes were found to portend unfavourable outcomes, for example, MYCN amplification in spinal ependymoma. The arrival of methylation profiling, having revolutionised the diagnosis of CNS tumours, now promises to bring increased prognostic accuracy, as has been shown in meningiomas. While MGMT promoter hypermethylation has remained a reliable biomarker of response to cytotoxic chemotherapy, targeted therapy in CNS tumours has unfortunately not had the success of other cancers. Therefore, predictive biomarkers have lagged behind the identification of prognostic biomarkers in CNS tumours. Emerging research from new clinical trials is cause for guarded optimism and may shift our conceptualisation of predictive biomarker testing in CNS tumours.

Glioma: bridging the tumor microenvironment, patient immune profiles and novel personalized immunotherapy

Glioma is the most common primary brain tumor, characterized by a consistently high patient mortality rate and a dismal prognosis affecting both survival and quality of life. Substantial evidence underscores the vital role of the immune system in eradicating tumors effectively and preventing metastasis, underscoring the importance of cancer immunotherapy which could potentially address the challenges in glioma therapy. Although glioma immunotherapies have shown promise in preclinical and early-phase clinical trials, they face specific limitations and challenges that have hindered their success in further phase III trials. Resistance to therapy has been a major challenge across many experimental approaches, and as of now, no immunotherapies have been approved. In addition, there are several other limitations facing glioma immunotherapy in clinical trials, such as high intra- and inter-tumoral heterogeneity, an inherently immunosuppressive microenvironment, the unique tissue-specific interactions between the central nervous system and the peripheral immune system, the existence of the blood-brain barrier, which is a physical barrier to drug delivery, and the immunosuppressive effects of standard therapy. Therefore, in this review, we delve into several challenges that need to be addressed to achieve boosted immunotherapy against gliomas. First, we discuss the hurdles posed by the glioma microenvironment, particularly its primary cellular inhabitants, in particular tumor-associated microglia and macrophages (TAMs), and myeloid cells, which represent a significant barrier to effective immunotherapy. Here we emphasize the impact of inducing immunogenic cell death (ICD) on the migration of Th17 cells into the tumor microenvironment, converting it into an immunologically "hot" environment and enhancing the effectiveness of ongoing immunotherapy. Next, we address the challenge associated with the accurate identification and characterization of the primary immune profiles of gliomas, and their implications for patient prognosis, which can facilitate the selection of personalized treatment regimens and predict the patient's response to immunotherapy. Finally, we explore a prospective approach to developing highly personalized vaccination strategies against gliomas, based on the search for patient-specific neoantigens. All the pertinent challenges discussed in this review will serve as a compass for future developments in immunotherapeutic strategies against gliomas, paving the way for upcoming preclinical and clinical research endeavors.

Advancements in Glioma Care: Focus on Emerging Neurosurgical Techniques

BACKGROUND

Despite significant advances in understanding the molecular pathways of glioma, translating this knowledge into effective long-term solutions remains a challenge. Indeed, gliomas pose a significant challenge to neurosurgical oncology because of their diverse histopathological features, genetic heterogeneity, and clinical manifestations. Relevant sections: This study focuses on glioma complexity by reviewing recent advances in their management, also considering new classification systems and emerging neurosurgical techniques. To bridge the gap between new neurosurgical approaches and standards of care, the importance of molecular diagnosis and the use of techniques such as laser interstitial thermal therapy (LITT) and focused ultrasound (FUS) are emphasized, exploring how the integration of molecular knowledge with emerging neurosurgical approaches can personalize and improve the treatment of gliomas.

CONCLUSIONS

The choice between LITT and FUS should be tailored to each case, considering factors such as tumor characteristics and patient health. LITT is favored for larger, complex tumors, while FUS is standard for smaller, deep-seated ones. Both techniques are equally effective for small and superficial tumors. Our study provides clear guidance for treating pediatric low-grade gliomas and highlights the crucial roles of LITT and FUS in managing high-grade gliomas in adults. This research sets the stage for improved patient care and future developments in the field of neurosurgery.

Comprehensive clinical assays for molecular diagnostics of gliomas: the current state and future prospects

Glioma is one of the most intractable types of cancer, due to delayed diagnosis at advanced stages. The clinical symptoms of glioma are unclear and due to a variety of glioma subtypes, available low-invasive testing is not effective enough to be introduced into routine medical laboratory practice. Therefore, recent advances in the clinical diagnosis of glioma have focused on liquid biopsy approaches that utilize a wide range of techniques such as next-generation sequencing (NGS), droplet-digital polymerase chain reaction (ddPCR), and quantitative PCR (qPCR). Among all techniques, NGS is the most advantageous diagnostic method. Despite the rapid cheapening of NGS experiments, the cost of such diagnostics remains high. Moreover, high-throughput diagnostics are not appropriate for molecular profiling of gliomas since patients with gliomas exhibit only a few diagnostic markers. In this review, we highlighted all available assays for glioma diagnosing for main pathogenic glioma DNA sequence alterations. In the present study, we reviewed the possibility of integrating routine molecular methods into the diagnosis of gliomas. We state that the development of an affordable assay covering all glioma genetic aberrations could enable early detection and improve patient outcomes. Moreover, the development of such molecular diagnostic kits could potentially be a good alternative to expensive NGS-based approaches.

Molecular and Circulating Biomarkers in Patients with Glioblastoma

Glioblastoma is the most aggressive malignant tumor of the central nervous system with a low survival rate. The difficulty of obtaining this tumor material represents a major limitation, making the real-time monitoring of tumor progression difficult, especially in the events of recurrence or resistance to treatment. The identification of characteristic biomarkers is indispensable for an accurate diagnosis, the rigorous follow-up of patients, and the development of new personalized treatments. Liquid biopsy, as a minimally invasive procedure, holds promise in this regard. The purpose of this paper is to summarize the current literature regarding the identification of molecular and circulating glioblastoma biomarkers and the importance of their integration as a valuable tool to improve patient care.

Prognostic and Predictive Biomarkers in Gliomas

Gliomas are the most common central nervous system tumors. New technologies, including genetic research and advanced statistical methods, revolutionize the therapeutic approach to the patient and reveal new points of treatment options. Moreover, the 2021 World Health Organization Classification of Tumors of the Central Nervous System has fundamentally changed the classification of gliomas and incorporated many molecular biomarkers. Given the rapid progress in neuro-oncology, here we compile the latest research on prognostic and predictive biomarkers in gliomas. In adult patients, IDH mutations are positive prognostic markers and have the greatest prognostic significance. However, CDKN2A deletion, in IDH-mutant astrocytomas, is a marker of the highest malignancy grade. Moreover, the presence of TERT promoter mutations, EGFR alterations, or a combination of chromosome 7 gain and 10 loss upgrade IDH-wildtype astrocytoma to glioblastoma. In pediatric patients, H3F3A alterations are the most important markers which predict the worse outcome. MGMT promoter methylation has the greatest clinical significance in predicting responses to temozolomide (TMZ). Conversely, mismatch repair defects cause hypermutation phenotype predicting poor response to TMZ. Finally, we discussed liquid biopsies, which are promising diagnostic, prognostic, and predictive techniques, but further work is needed to implement these novel technologies in clinical practice.

Dual MGMT inactivation by promoter hypermethylation and loss of the long arm of chromosome 10 in glioblastoma

Background

Epigenetic inactivation of O6‐methylguanine‐methyltransferase (MGMT) gene by methylation of its promoter is predictive of Temozolomid (TMZ) response in glioblastoma (GBM). MGMT is located on chromosome 10q26 and the loss of chromosome 10q is observed in 70% of GBMs. In this study, we assessed the hypothesis that the dual inactivation of MGMT, by hypermethylation of MGMT promoter and by loss the long arm of chromosome 10 (10q), may confer greater sensitivity to TMZ.

Methods

A total of 149 tumor samples from patients diagnosed with GBM based on the WHO 2016 classification were included in this retrospective study between November 2016 and December 2018. Methylation status of MGMT promoter was evaluated by pyrosequencing and status of chromosome 10q was assessed by array comparative genomic hybridization.

Results

Glioblastoma patients with chromosome 10q loss associated with hypermethylation of MGMT promoter had significantly longer overall survival (OS) (P = .0024) and progression‐free survival (PFS) (P = .031). Indeed, median OS of patients with dual inactivation of MGMT was 21.5 months compared to 12 months and 8.1 months for groups with single MGMT inactivation by hypermethylation and by 10q loss, respectively. The group with no MGMT inactivation had 9.5 months OS. Moreover, all long‐term survivors with persistent response to TMZ treatment (OS ≥ 30 months) displayed dual inactivation of MGMT.

Conclusions

Our data suggest that the molecular subgroup characterized by the dual inactivation of MGMT receives greater benefit from TMZ treatment. The results of our study may be of immediate clinical interest since chromosome 10q status and methylation of MGMT promoter are commonly determined in routine practice.