Comparison of prognosis between patients undergoing radical nephrectomy versus partial nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma ≤7 cm T3aN0/xM0: Survival benefit is biased toward partial nephrectomy

Relevance of Positive Surgical Margins in Localized Renal Cell Carcinoma After Surgical Resection: Predictive Factors and Survival Implications

INTRODUCTION

The implications of positive surgical margins (PSM) after surgery for renal cell carcinoma (RCC) remain subject of discussion. This study aimed to identify risk factors for PSM, assess its effect on overall survival (OS), and determine predictors of OS.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Data from RCC surgeries at Mannheim University Medical Center between 2010 and 2023 was analyzed. Propensity score matching balanced PSM and control groups using age, surgical approach, tumor stage, histological subtype, and American Association of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score. Logistic and cox regression models predict PSM and OS, respectively. Kaplan-Meier analysis compared OS of PSM patients and controls.

RESULTS

A total of 1066 RCC patients were included. Propensity score matching yielded 32 PSM patients and 96 controls. Multivariable logistic regression identified tumor stage ≥ T3a (odds ratio [OR] = 2.74, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.0-6.8, P = .04) and chromophobe, compared to clear cell, RCC (OR = 3.19, 95% CI = 1.0-8.7, P = .03) as independent predictors of PSM. Multivariable cox regression found age > 65 years (hazard ratio [HR] = 2.65, 95% CI = 1.7-4.2, P < .01) and tumor stage ≥ T3a (HR = 2.25, 95% CI = 1.4-3.7, P < .01) to predict shorter OS. Partial vs. radical nephrectomy was associated with improved OS (HR = 0.49, 95% CI = 0.3-0.9, P = .02). Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed no OS difference between PSM patients and controls (P = .49) over a 45-month median follow-up.

CONCLUSION

PSM is not a primary determinant of inferior survival, while age and tumor stage play a more prominent role. A well-calibrated follow-up protocol for PSM patients, combining PSM with coinciding factors such as tumor stage, grade, size, or PSM extent, is crucial for adequate surveillance while preventing excessive interventions.

Gross Hematuria Does not Affect the Selection of Nephrectomy Types for Clinical Stage 1 Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Multicenter, Retrospective Cohort Study

PURPOSE

This study aimed to discuss the correlation between gross hematuria and postoperative upstaging (from T1 to T3a) in patients with cT1 clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) and to compare oncologic outcomes of partial nephrectomy (PN) and radical nephrectomy (RN) in patients with gross hematuria.

METHODS

A total of 2145 patients who met the criteria were enrolled in the study (including 363 patients with gross hematuria). The least absolute selection and shrinkage operator logistic regression was used to evaluate the risk factor of postoperative pathological upstaging. The propensity score matching (PSM) and stable inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) analysis were used to balance the confounding factors. The Kaplan-Meier analysis and multivariate Cox proportional risk regression model were used to assess the prognosis.

RESULTS

Gross hematuria was a risk factor of postoperative pathological upstaging (odds ratio [OR] = 3.96; 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.44-6.42; P < 0.001). After PSM and stable IPTW adjustment, the characteristics were similar in corresponding patients in the PN and RN groups. In the PSM cohort, PN did not have a statistically significant impact on recurrence-free survival (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.48; 95% CI 0.25-8.88; P = 0.67), metastasis-free survival (HR = 1.24; 95% CI 0.33-4.66; P = 0.75), and overall survival (HR = 1.46; 95% CI 0.31-6.73; P = 0.63) compared with RN. The results were confirmed in sensitivity analyses.

CONCLUSIONS

Although gross hematuria was associated with postoperative pathological upstaging in patients with cT1 ccRCC, PN should still be the preferred treatment for such patients.

Overcoming fear of developing country: A case report of retroperitoneal laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for T3A renal cell carcinoma

INTRODUCTION

Renal cell carcinoma poses significant challenges in kidney diseases, particularly in the context of the T3 stage, where treatment strategies remain controversial. The utilization of laparoscopic partial nephrectomy, particularly in developing countries, has been restricted for such patients, primarily due to limited infrastructure and concerns about recurrence risk and long-term pathologic outcomes.

PRESENTATION OF CASE

In this report, we present a case of a 64-year-old male diagnosed with T3aN0M0 renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Abdominal computed tomography revealed a 5.2 × 5.2 × 5.1 cm mass on the right upper part of the kidney with a possible thrombus in the superior renal polar vein. The patient underwent successful treatment with retroperitoneal laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (LPN), leading to the preservation of kidney function with <4 mL/min/1.73 m2 GFR reduced after one year postoperative (estimated GFR from 85 mL/min/1.73 m2 to 81.79 mL/min/1.73 m2). The patient was discharged after three days; no recurrence was observed during the follow-up.

DISCUSSION

For stage T3a RCC, studies show that LPN induces comparable long-term outcomes to radical nephrectomy, with advantages such as preserved kidney function, reduced operative time, blood loss, and shorter hospital stays. However, due to infrastructure constraints and limited access to robotic-assisted surgery in our country, coupled with concerns about tumor recurrence, laparoscopic radical nephrectomy is predominantly employed for similar patients. Our case represents one of the very first cases in which we successfully treated a patient diagnosed with T3a RCC using retroperitoneal laparoscopic partial nephrectomy.

CONCLUSION

Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy is a reliable choice for T3aN0M0 RCC with good long-term outcomes and preserved renal function, especially by the hands of an experienced laparoscopic surgeon.

Partial Nephrectomy Versus Radical Nephrectomy for Endophytic Renal Tumors: Comparison of Operative, Functional, and Oncological Outcomes by Propensity Score Matching Analysis

Purpose

The study aimed to compare operative, functional, and oncological outcomes between partial nephrectomy (PN) and radical nephrectomy (RN) for entophytic renal tumors (ERTs) by propensity score matching (PSM) analysis.

Methods

A total of 228 patients with ERTs who underwent PN or RN between August 2014 and December 2021 were assessed. A PSM in a 1:1 ratio was conducted to balance the differences between groups. Perioperative characteristics, renal functional, and oncological outcomes were compared between groups. Univariate and multivariate logistic and Cox proportional hazard regression analyses were used to determine the predictors of functional and survival outcomes.

Results

After PSM, 136 cases were matched to the PN group (n = 68) and the RN group (n = 68). Patients who underwent RN had shorter OT, less EBL, and lower high-grade complications (all p <0.05) relative to those who underwent PN. However, better perseveration of renal function was observed in the PN group, which was reflected in 48-h postoperative AKI (44.1% vs. 70.6%, p = 0.002), 1-year postoperative 90% eGFR preservation (45.6% vs. 22.1%, p = 0.004), and new-onset CKD Stage ≥III at last follow-up (2.9% vs. 29.4%, p <0.001). RN was the independent factor of short-term (OR, 2.812; 95% CI, 1.369–5.778; p = 0.005) and long-term renal function decline (OR, 10.242; 95% CI, 2.175–48.240; p = 0.003). Furthermore, PN resulted in a better OS and similar PFS and CSS as compared to RN (p = 0.042, 0.15, and 0.21, respectively). RN (OR, 7.361; 95% CI, 1.143–47.423; p = 0.036) and pT3 stage (OR, 4.241; 95% CI, 1.079–16.664; p = 0.039) were independent predictors of overall mortality.

Conclusion

Among patients with ERTs, although the PN group showed a higher incidence of high-grade complications than RN, when technically feasible and with experienced surgeons, PN is recommended for better preservation of renal function, longer OS, and similar oncological outcomes.

Association of Extrarenal Invasion Patterns and Tumor Size with the Differences in Survival Outcomes of T3a Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Proposal Modified T3a Stage System is Needed

Objective

T3a renal cell carcinoma (RCC) did not consider tumor size and different extrarenal invasion patterns in the current TNM staging system. Here, we want to investigate the association of survival outcomes with different extrarenal invasion patterns and tumor size of T3a RCC.

Methods

We identified T3a RCC patients from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database in 2004–2015. The extrarenal invasion patterns included renal vein invasion, renal sinus/peri-sinus fat invasion, or perinephric fat invasion. Cox proportional hazards models and Fine and Gray models were used to estimate overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS), and the hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated. C-index is used to evaluate the predictive ability of the model. Restricted cubic splines were used to estimate the HRs of tumor size on the risk of OS and CSS.

Results

In total, 4834 T3a RCC patients were included in the analysis. Of them, 1403 (29%) present isolated extrarenal invasion pattern, while 1403 (71%) were any combined invasion pattern, which was associated with a higher risk of lymph-node/distant metastasis and a worse OS and CSS compared with isolated extrarenal invasion pattern, but a comparable CSS and OS were observed between each isolated invasion pattern. In restricted cubic splines, a non-linear shape was observed for the association between the tumor size and OS and CSS, compared with the smallest tumor size group (≤4cm), the adjusted HR of the largest tumor size group (≥10cm) was 1.59 for all-cause mortality, and 2.27 for tumor-specific mortality, respectively. However, in a cohort of T3a RCC with a combined invasion pattern, tumor size is not an independent risk factor for prognosis. Finally, the model added two covariates of tumor size and invasion patterns that could improve the predictive ability of OS and CSS for T3a patients (c-index: +1.2%, +1.3%, respectively).

Conclusion

Tumor size and extrarenal invasion type are valid parameters of the OS and CSS for T3a RCC patients and need to be considered for the next generation of the T-stage system.