1
|
Bohan RP, Riner AN, Herremans KM, George TJ, Hughes SJ, Solberg LB. Ethical Considerations of Biopsies in Early-Stage Pancreatic Cancer. JCO Oncol Pract 2023; 19:882-887. [PMID: 37647578 PMCID: PMC10615436 DOI: 10.1200/op.23.00044] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/24/2023] [Revised: 06/15/2023] [Accepted: 07/11/2023] [Indexed: 09/01/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The standard of care in resectable and borderline resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) has evolved to include neoadjuvant treatment before surgical resection. Current guidelines call for obtaining histologic tissue diagnosis via endoscopic ultrasound fine-needle aspiration before administration of neoadjuvant therapy, which differ from guidelines discouraging delay in surgical resection for a biopsy. MATERIALS AND METHODS Whether to proceed with treatment before a biopsy confirms that malignancy is a nuanced decision and includes considerations of physical and psychological risks entailed in both pursuing and forgoing a biopsy. RESULTS Accuracy of imaging and biopsy results, the presence of contributing clinical signs/symptoms, and the existing precedents of considering biopsies as waivable such as in scenarios with high clinical suspicion and primary surgical resection. CONCLUSION When considering the aspects of ethical medical practice including beneficence (doing good), nonmaleficence (avoiding harm), autonomy (allowing patients to make decisions about their care), and utilitarianism (doing the most good for the most people), analysis of whether guidelines guiding biopsies should continue to differ between resection and neoadjuvant treatments in PDAC is prudent.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Riley P. Bohan
- University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, FL
| | - Andrea N. Riner
- Department of Surgery, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, FL
| | - Kelly M. Herremans
- Department of Surgery, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, FL
| | - Thomas J. George
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, FL
| | - Steven J. Hughes
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, FL
| | - Lauren B. Solberg
- Program in Bioethics, Law and Medical Professionalism, Department of Community Health and Family Medicine, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, FL
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Singhal R, Rogers SC, Lee JH, Ramnaraign B, Sahin I, Fabregas JC, Thomas RM, Hughes SJ, Nassour I, Hitchcock K, Russell K, Kayaleh O, Turk A, Zlotecki R, DeRemer DL, George TJ. A phase II study of neoadjuvant liposomal irinotecan with 5-FU and oxaliplatin (NALIRIFOX) in pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Future Oncol 2023; 19:1841-1851. [PMID: 37753702 PMCID: PMC10594143 DOI: 10.2217/fon-2023-0256] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/28/2023] [Accepted: 08/01/2023] [Indexed: 09/28/2023] Open
Abstract
For patients with localized pancreatic cancer with minimal vascular involvement, optimal survivability requires a multidisciplinary approach of surgical resection and systemic chemotherapy. FOLFIRINOX is a combination chemotherapy regimen that offers promising results in the perioperative and metastatic settings; however, it can cause significant adverse effects. Such toxicity can negatively impact some patients, resulting in chemotherapy discontinuation or surgical unsuitability. In an effort to reduce toxicities and optimize outcomes, this investigation explores the safety and feasibility of substituting liposomal irinotecan (nal-IRI) for nonliposomal irinotecan to improve tumor drug delivery and potentially reduce toxicity. This regimen, NALIRIFOX, has the potential to be both safer and more effective when administered in the preoperative setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ruchi Singhal
- Department of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - Sherise C Rogers
- Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology & Oncology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - Ji-Hyun Lee
- Department of Biostatistics, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - Brian Ramnaraign
- Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology & Oncology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - Ilyas Sahin
- Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology & Oncology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - Jesus C Fabregas
- Memorial Cancer Institute, Florida Atlantic University, Hollywood, FL, USA
| | - Ryan M. Thomas
- Department of Surgery, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - Steven J Hughes
- Department of Surgery, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - Ibrahim Nassour
- Department of Surgery, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | | | | | - Omar Kayaleh
- Orlando Health Cancer Institute, Orlando, FL, USA
| | - Anita Turk
- Indiana University Simon Comprehensive Cancer Center, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Robert Zlotecki
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - David L DeRemer
- College of Pharmacy, University of Florida, Department of Pharmacotherapy & Translational Research, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - Thomas J George
- Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology & Oncology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Schreiber L, Zeh R, Monsour C, Ejaz A, Tsung A, Pawlik TM, Miller E, Noonan A, Krishna SG, Santry H, Cloyd JM. Multi-specialty physician perspectives on barriers and facilitators to the use of neoadjuvant therapy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. HPB (Oxford) 2022; 24:833-840. [PMID: 34764009 PMCID: PMC9035472 DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2021.10.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2021] [Revised: 10/15/2021] [Accepted: 10/19/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Neoadjuvant therapy (NT) is increasingly utilized for patients with localized pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). Given the importance of completing multimodality therapy, the purpose of this qualitative study was to characterize physician perspectives on barriers and facilitators to delivering NT. METHODS A purposive sample of surgical, medical, and radiation oncologists participated in semi-structured interviews. Interviews were transcribed and coded by 3 independent researchers, iteratively identifying themes until saturation was achieved. RESULTS Participants (n = 27) were heterogeneous in specialty, years of experience, practice setting, gender, and geography. The most commonly cited advantage of NT was the ability to downstage patients. The most commonly cited barriers included lack of access and limited evidence. Patient preference for immediate surgery was frequently cited as a barrier, but most participants felt that patients eventually understood the treatment recommendation after informed discussion. Recommendations to enhance the delivery of NT included improved patient education, communication, and better evidence. CONCLUSION In this qualitative study, indications for, barriers to, and opportunities to improve the delivery of NT for localized PDAC were identified. These results highlight the need for better evidence and protocol standardization for NT as well as methods of improving care coordination, communication, and education to improve patient-centered outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lena Schreiber
- Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, 410 W 10th Ave, Columbus, OH, 43210, USA
| | - Ryan Zeh
- Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, 410 W 10th Ave, Columbus, OH, 43210, USA
| | - Christina Monsour
- Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, 410 W 10th Ave, Columbus, OH, 43210, USA
| | - Aslam Ejaz
- Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, 410 W 10th Ave, Columbus, OH, 43210, USA
| | - Allan Tsung
- Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, 410 W 10th Ave, Columbus, OH, 43210, USA
| | - Timothy M Pawlik
- Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, 410 W 10th Ave, Columbus, OH, 43210, USA
| | - Eric Miller
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, 410 W 10th Ave, Columbus, OH, 43210, USA
| | - Anne Noonan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, 410 W 10th Ave, Columbus, OH, 43210, USA
| | - Somashekar G Krishna
- Department of Internal Medicine, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, 410 W 10th Ave, Columbus, OH, 43210, USA
| | - Heena Santry
- Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, 410 W 10th Ave, Columbus, OH, 43210, USA
| | - Jordan M Cloyd
- Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, 410 W 10th Ave, Columbus, OH, 43210, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Lee K, Oh HJ, Kang MS, Kim S, Ahn S, Kim MJ, Kim SW, Chang S. Metagenomic analysis of gut microbiome reveals a dynamic change in Alistipes onderdonkii in the preclinical model of pancreatic cancer, suppressing its proliferation. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 2021; 105:8343-8358. [PMID: 34648062 DOI: 10.1007/s00253-021-11617-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/20/2021] [Revised: 09/12/2021] [Accepted: 09/20/2021] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Pancreatic cancer is a lethal cancer with aggressive and invasive characteristics. By the time it is diagnosed, patients already have tumors extended to other organs and show extremely low survival rates. The gut microbiome is known to be associated with many diseases and its imbalance affects the pathogenesis of pancreatic cancer. In this study, we established an orthotopic, patient-derived xenograft model to identify how the gut microbiome is linked to pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). Using the 16S rDNA metagenomic sequencing, we revealed that the levels of Alistipes onderdonkii and Roseburia hominis decreased in the gut microbiome of the PDAC model. To explore the crosstalk between the two bacteria and PDAC cells, we collected the supernatant of the bacteria or cancer cell culture medium and treated it in a cross manner. While the cancer cell medium did not affect bacterial growth, we observed that the A. onderdonkii medium suppressed the growth of the pancreatic primary cancer cells. Using the bromodeoxyuridine/7-amino-actinomycin D (BrdU/7-AAD) staining assay, we confirmed that the A. onderdonkii medium inhibited the proliferation of the pancreatic primary cancer cells. Furthermore, RNA-seq analysis revealed that the A. onderdonkii medium induced unique transcriptomic alterations in the PDAC cells, compared to the normal pancreatic cells. Altogether, our data suggest that the reduction in the A. onderdonkii in the gut microbiome provides a proliferation advantage to the pancreatic cancer cells. KEY POINTS: • Metagenome analysis of pancreatic cancer model reveals A. onderdonkii downregulation. • A. onderdonkii culture supernatant suppressed the proliferation of pancreatic cancer cells. • RNA seq data reveals typical gene expression changes induced by A. onderdonkii.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kihak Lee
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, 05505, Republic of Korea
| | - Hyo Jae Oh
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, 05505, Republic of Korea
| | - Min-Su Kang
- Division of Applied Life Science (BK21 Four), PMBBRC, Gyeongsang National University, Jinju, Republic of Korea
| | - Sinae Kim
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, 05505, Republic of Korea
| | - Sehee Ahn
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, 05505, Republic of Korea
| | - Myung Ji Kim
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, 05505, Republic of Korea
| | - Seon-Won Kim
- Division of Applied Life Science (BK21 Four), PMBBRC, Gyeongsang National University, Jinju, Republic of Korea.
| | - Suhwan Chang
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, 05505, Republic of Korea.
- Department of Physiology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, 05505, Republic of Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Surgery for Recurrent Pancreatic Cancer: Is It Effective? Cancers (Basel) 2019; 11:cancers11070991. [PMID: 31315222 PMCID: PMC6679234 DOI: 10.3390/cancers11070991] [Citation(s) in RCA: 42] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/26/2019] [Revised: 07/10/2019] [Accepted: 07/12/2019] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Despite improvements to surgical procedures and novel combinations of drugs for adjuvant and neoadjuvant therapies for pancreatic adenocarcinoma, the recurrence rate after radical surgery is still high. Little is known about the role of surgery in the treatment of isolated recurrences of pancreatic cancer. The aim of this study was to review the current literature dealing with surgery for recurrent pancreatic cancer in order to examine its feasibility and effectiveness. An extensive literature review was conducted according to the 2009 Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines and 14 articles dealing with re-resections for recurrent pancreatic adenocarcinoma were analyzed, focusing on the characteristics of the primary neoplasm and its recurrence, the surgical procedures used, and patient outcomes. Data were retrieved on a total of 301 patients. The interval between surgery for primary pancreatic cancer and the detection of a recurrence ranged from 2 to 120 months. The recurrence was local or regional in 230 patients, and distant in 71. The median overall survival was 68.9 months (range 3–152) after resection of the primary tumor, and 26.0 months (range 0–112) after surgery for recurrent disease. The disease-free interval after the resection of recurrences was 14.2 months (range 4–29). Although data analysis was performed on a heterogeneous and limited number of patients, some of these may benefit from surgery for isolated recurrence of pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Further studies are needed to identify these cases.
Collapse
|
6
|
Borazanci E, Sckolnik S, Amini A. Neo-adjuvant therapy for pancreatic cancer: hope for the future. Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 2019; 13:579-589. [PMID: 30979348 DOI: 10.1080/17474124.2019.1607294] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/28/2023]
Abstract
In 2018, pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) was the 3rd highest cause cancer related death in the United States. Worldwide estimates in 2018 indicate 458,918 cases diagnosed with 432,242 deaths. Standard therapy for decades for localized PDAC has been to pursue surgical resection for localized disease. For the individuals who are diagnosed with localized PDAC and undergo surgical resection, historical survival has been reported to be around 24 months. While recent advancements in the use of multiagent systemic therapy has allowed for greater survival benefit, adjuvant therapy does have limitations. Recently, neo-adjuvant therapy for PDAC has become more accepted in practice. Areas covered: In this review, we will discuss the current guidelines for treatment of localized PDAC, the pros and cons of neo-adjuvant versus adjuvant therapy for PDAC, the utilization of available biomarkers for the management of PDAC, and future possibilities for clinical trials. Expert commentary: Neo-adjuvant therapy for localized PDAC has tremendous promise in leading to greater survival by treating for micro-metastatic disease along with selecting for patients for better outcomes. Further work based upon molecular insights will lead to better biomarkers for treatment assessment along with improvements in treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Albert Amini
- c Arizona Premier Surgery , Scottsdale , AZ , USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Nurmi A, Mustonen H, Parviainen H, Peltola K, Haglund C, Seppänen H. Neoadjuvant therapy offers longer survival than upfront surgery for poorly differentiated and higher stage pancreatic cancer. Acta Oncol 2018; 57:799-806. [PMID: 29241394 DOI: 10.1080/0284186x.2017.1415458] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Neoadjuvant therapy for pancreatic cancer remains controversial. Our aim was to assess differences in survival, disease recurrence and histopathological tumor characteristics between patients treated with neoadjuvant therapy followed by subsequent surgery and patients undergoing upfront surgery. MATERIAL AND METHODS Out of 399 consecutive pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) patients operated at Helsinki University Hospital in 2000-2015, 75 borderline resectable patients were treated with neoadjuvant therapy. Resectable propensity scored patients (n = 150) underwent upfront surgery. Neoadjuvant therapy consisted of folfirinox, single gemcitabine or combined with cisplatin, nab-paclitaxel or capecitabine with or without radiation. Survival was calculated with Kaplan-Meier and compared with the Breslow test. Survival was determined from the start of treatment, being the first day of treatment for patients treated with neoadjuvant therapy and the date of surgery for others. RESULTS Between 2000 and 2015 median disease-specific survival (DSS) [34 vs. 26 months, p = .016] and disease-free survival (DFS) [22 vs. 13 months, p = .001] were longer in patients treated with neoadjuvant therapy than in those undergoing upfront surgery. Survival differences were not significant in the 2000s but were, in turn, among patients treated in the 2010s with better survival for patients treated with neoadjuvant therapy [DSS 35 vs. 26 months, p = .008 and DFS 25 vs. 13 months, p = .001]. Especially patients with poorly differentiated G3 tumors [DSS 30 vs. 11 months, p = .004 and DFS 21 vs. 7 months, p = .001] and higher stage IIB-III [DSS 34 vs. 20 months, p = .006 and DFS 21 vs. 10 months, p = .001] had longer survival when treated with neoadjuvant therapy. CONCLUSIONS PDAC patients treated with neoadjuvant therapy had longer DSS and DFS than those undergoing upfront surgery. Neoadjuvant therapy benefits especially borderline resectable patients with higher stage and poorly differentiated tumors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna Nurmi
- Department of Surgery, Helsinki University Hospital, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Harri Mustonen
- Department of Surgery, Helsinki University Hospital, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Helka Parviainen
- HUS Medical Imaging Centre, Radiology, Helsinki University Hospital, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Katriina Peltola
- Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Helsinki University Hospital, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Caj Haglund
- Department of Surgery, Helsinki University Hospital, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
- Research Programs Unit, Translational Cancer Biology, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Hanna Seppänen
- Department of Surgery, Helsinki University Hospital, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Abstract
OPINION STATEMENT Pancreatic cancer surgery is a continuously evolving field. Despite tremendous advances in perioperative outcomes, pancreatic resection is still associated with substantial morbidity, and mortality is not nil. Institutional caseload is a well-established determinant of patient outcomes, and centralization to experienced centers is essential to the safety and oncological appropriateness of the resection. Minimally invasive approaches are increasingly applied for pancreatic resection, even in cancer patients. Nevertheless, the level of evidence in this field remains low. Minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy appears potentially beneficial towards some perioperative outcomes, although its oncological results remain incompletely studied. Data regarding perioperative and oncologic outcomes for minimally invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy (Whipple's resection) is even less mature, but suggest that similar results as the open approach can be achieved in selected, high-volume centers. Conversely, its indiscriminate adoption by inexperienced surgeons and institutions has potential deleterious effects given its steep learning curve. Newer neoadjuvant treatment protocols display enhanced ability to downstage advanced tumors, increasing candidates for potentially curative surgery. Conversely, putative benefits of neoadjuvant treatment in patients with technically resectable tumors have not been reliably demonstrated and its optimal indications remain highly controversial.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura Maggino
- Department of Surgery, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Spruce Street, Philadelphia, PA, USA.,Unit of General and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery and Oncology-The Pancreas Institute, University of Verona Hospital Trust, Verona, Italy
| | - Charles M Vollmer
- Department of Surgery, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Spruce Street, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Itchins M, Arena J, Nahm CB, Rabindran J, Kim S, Gibbs E, Bergamin S, Chua TC, Gill AJ, Maher R, Diakos C, Wong M, Mittal A, Hruby G, Kneebone A, Pavlakis N, Samra J, Clarke S. Retrospective cohort analysis of neoadjuvant treatment and survival in resectable and borderline resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma in a high volume referral centre. Eur J Surg Oncol 2017; 43:1711-1717. [PMID: 28688722 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2017.06.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/04/2017] [Revised: 05/28/2017] [Accepted: 06/09/2017] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is a deadly disease. Neoadjuvant therapy (NA) with chemotherapy (NAC) and radiotherapy (RT) prior to surgery provides promise. In the absence of prospective data, well annotated clinical data from high-volume units may provide pilot data for randomised trials. METHODS Medical records from a tertiary hospital in Sydney, Australia, were analysed to identify all patients with resectable or borderline resectable PDAC. Data regarding treatment, toxicity and survival were collected. RESULTS Between January 1 2010 and April 1 2016, 220 sequential patients were treated: 87 with NA and 133 with upfront operation (UO). Forty-three NA patients (52%) and 5 UO patients (4%) were borderline resectable at diagnosis. Twenty-four borderline patients received NA RT, 22 sequential to NAC. The median overall survival (OS) in the NA group was 25.9 months (mo); 95% CI (21.1-43.0 mo) compared to 26.9 mo (19.7, 32.7) in the UO; HR 0.89; log-ranked p-value = 0.58. Sixty-nine NA patients (79%) were resected, mOS was 29.2 mo (22.27, not reached (NR)). Twenty-two NA (31%) versus 22 UO (17%) were node negative at operation (N0). In those managed with NAC/RT the mOS was 29.0 mo (17.3, NR). There were no post-operative deaths with NA within 90-days and three in the UO arm. DISCUSSION This is a hypothesis generating retrospective review of a selected real-world population in a high-throughput unit. Treatment with NA was well tolerated. The long observed survival in this group may be explained by lymph node sterilisation by NA, and the achievement of R0 resection in a greater proportion of patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Itchins
- Department of Oncology, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Sydney Medical School (Northern), The University of Sydney, Australia.
| | - J Arena
- Department of Oncology, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - C B Nahm
- Upper GI Surgical Unit, Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Sydney Medical School (Northern), The University of Sydney, Australia
| | - J Rabindran
- Upper GI Surgical Unit, Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Sydney Medical School (Northern), The University of Sydney, Australia
| | - S Kim
- Upper GI Surgical Unit, Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - E Gibbs
- National Health and Medical Research Council Clinical Trial Centre (NHMRC CTC), The University of Sydney, Australia
| | - S Bergamin
- Department of Oncology, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - T C Chua
- Upper GI Surgical Unit, Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - A J Gill
- Sydney Medical School (Northern), The University of Sydney, Australia; Cancer Diagnosis and Pathology, Kolling Institute, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, Australia
| | - R Maher
- Department of Radiology, Royal North Shore Hospital, Australia
| | - C Diakos
- Department of Oncology, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Sydney Medical School (Northern), The University of Sydney, Australia; Northern Cancer Institute, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - M Wong
- Department of Medical Oncology, Gosford Hospital, New South Wales, Australia
| | - A Mittal
- Upper GI Surgical Unit, Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Sydney Medical School (Northern), The University of Sydney, Australia
| | - G Hruby
- Department of Oncology, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Sydney Medical School (Northern), The University of Sydney, Australia
| | - A Kneebone
- Department of Oncology, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Sydney Medical School (Northern), The University of Sydney, Australia
| | - N Pavlakis
- Department of Oncology, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Sydney Medical School (Northern), The University of Sydney, Australia; Northern Cancer Institute, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - J Samra
- Upper GI Surgical Unit, Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Sydney Medical School (Northern), The University of Sydney, Australia
| | - S Clarke
- Department of Oncology, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Sydney Medical School (Northern), The University of Sydney, Australia; Northern Cancer Institute, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Schorn S, Demir IE, Reyes CM, Saricaoglu C, Samm N, Schirren R, Tieftrunk E, Hartmann D, Friess H, Ceyhan GO. The impact of neoadjuvant therapy on the histopathological features of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma - A systematic review and meta-analysis. Cancer Treat Rev 2017; 55:96-106. [PMID: 28342938 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2017.03.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 71] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/03/2017] [Revised: 03/04/2017] [Accepted: 03/06/2017] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Due to increased rates of curative tumor resections exceeding 60% after FOLFIRINOX-treatment, neoadjuvant therapy/NTx is increasingly recognized as an effective therapy option for downstaging borderline or locally advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma/PDAC. Yet, the effects of NTx on the common histopathological features of PDAC have not been systematically analysed. Therefore, the aim of the current study was to assess the impact of NTx on relevant histopathological features of PDAC. PATIENTS AND METHODS Biomedical databases were systematically screened for predefined searching terms related to NTx and PDAC. The Preferred-Reporting-Items-for-Systematic-review-and-Meta-Analysis/PRISMA-guidelines were used to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis. Articles meeting the predefined criteria were analysed on relevance, and a meta-analysis was performed. RESULTS A total of 9031 studies could be identified that analysed the effect of NTx on PDAC. Only 35 studies presented comparative data on the histological features of neoadjuvantly treated vs. upfront resected PDAC patients. In meta-analyses, the beneficial effect of NTx was reflected by reduced tumor size (T1/2: RR 2.87, 95%-CI: 1.52-5.42, P=0.001, T3/4: RR 0.78, 95%-CI: 0.69-0.89, P=0.0002), lower N-Stage (N0: RR 2.14, 95%-CI: 1.85-2.46, P<0.00001, N1: RR 0.59, 95%-CI: 0.53-0.65, P<0.00001), higher R0-rates (R0: RR 1.13, 95%-CI: 1.08-1.18, P<0.00001, R1: RR 0.66, 95%-CI: 0.58-0.76, P<0.00001), less perineural invasion (Pn1: RR 0.78, 95%-CI: 0.73-0.83, P<0.00001), less lymphatic vessel invasion (RR: 0.50, 95%-CI: 0.36-0.70, P<0.0001) and fewer G3-tumors (RR 0.82, 95%-CI: 0.71-0.94, P=0.005). CONCLUSIONS NTx in PDAC seems to exert its beneficial effect in borderline or locally advanced PDAC over genuine tumor downstaging. Thus, although at least 40% of all NTx treated patients remain unresectable even with modern NTx regimes, neoadjuvantly treated PDAC showed not only increasing resectability rates especially after FOLFIRINOX, but even reach a lower tumor stage than primarily resected PDAC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephan Schorn
- Department of Surgery, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany
| | - Ihsan Ekin Demir
- Department of Surgery, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany
| | - Carmen Mota Reyes
- Department of Surgery, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany
| | - Cemil Saricaoglu
- Department of Surgery, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany
| | - Nicole Samm
- Department of Surgery, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany
| | - Rebekka Schirren
- Department of Surgery, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany
| | - Elke Tieftrunk
- Department of Surgery, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany
| | - Daniel Hartmann
- Department of Surgery, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany
| | - Helmut Friess
- Department of Surgery, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany
| | - Güralp Onur Ceyhan
- Department of Surgery, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Lutfi W, Talamonti MS, Kantor O, Wang CH, Stocker SJ, Bentrem DJ, Roggin KK, Winchester DJ, Marsh R, Prinz RA, Baker MS. Neoadjuvant external beam radiation is associated with No benefit in overall survival for early stage pancreatic cancer. Am J Surg 2017; 213:521-525. [DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2016.11.039] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/27/2016] [Revised: 11/22/2016] [Accepted: 11/25/2016] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
|
12
|
de Geus SWL, Eskander MF, Bliss LA, Kasumova GG, Ng SC, Callery MP, Tseng JF. Neoadjuvant therapy versus upfront surgery for resected pancreatic adenocarcinoma: A nationwide propensity score matched analysis. Surgery 2016; 161:592-601. [PMID: 28341441 DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2016.08.040] [Citation(s) in RCA: 46] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/17/2016] [Revised: 08/23/2016] [Accepted: 08/30/2016] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Neoadjuvant therapy is an emerging paradigm in pancreatic cancer care; however, its role for resectable disease remains controversial in the absence of conclusive randomized controlled trials. The purpose of the present study is to assess the impact of neoadjuvant therapy on survival in resected pancreatic cancer patients by clinical stage. METHODS A retrospective cohort study using the National Cancer Data Base from 2004 to 2012 including nonmetastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma patients who underwent pancreatectomy and initiated chemotherapy. Propensity score matching within each stage was used to account for potential selection bias between patients undergoing neoadjuvant therapy and upfront surgery. Overall survival was compared by the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS In the study, 1,541 and 7,159 patients received neoadjuvant therapy followed by surgery and upfront surgery succeeded by adjuvant therapy, respectively. In clinical stage III pancreatic cancer (n = 486), neoadjuvant therapy was associated with significant survival benefit after matching (median survival 22.9 vs 17.3 months; log-rank P < .0001) compared with conventional upfront surgery followed by adjuvant therapy; however, no survival difference was found between the 2 treatment sequences in patients with clinical stage I (n = 3,149; median survival, 26.2 vs 25.7 months; P = .4418) and II (n = 5,065; median survival, 23.5 vs 23.0 months; P = .7751) disease after matching. CONCLUSION The survival impact of neoadjuvant therapy is stage-dependent. Neoadjuvant therapy does not disadvantage survival compared with conventional upfront surgery followed by adjuvant therapy in any stage, and is associated with a significant survival advantage in stage III pancreatic cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Susanna W L de Geus
- Surgical Outcomes Analysis & Research, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Mariam F Eskander
- Surgical Outcomes Analysis & Research, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Lindsay A Bliss
- Surgical Outcomes Analysis & Research, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Gyulnara G Kasumova
- Surgical Outcomes Analysis & Research, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Sing Chau Ng
- Surgical Outcomes Analysis & Research, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Mark P Callery
- Surgical Outcomes Analysis & Research, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Jennifer F Tseng
- Surgical Outcomes Analysis & Research, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Steen W, Blom R, Busch O, Gerhards M, Besselink M, Dijk F, Festen S. Prognostic value of occult tumor cells obtained by peritoneal lavage in patients with resectable pancreatic cancer and no ascites: A systematic review. J Surg Oncol 2016; 114:743-751. [PMID: 27642007 DOI: 10.1002/jso.24402] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/12/2016] [Accepted: 07/29/2016] [Indexed: 01/12/2023]
Abstract
The poor survival of patients with resectable pancreatic cancer might be related to the presence of occult peritoneal tumor cells (OPTC). This systematic review studies the prognostic value of cytology and carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) by real-time polymerase chain reaction in peritoneal fluid. The results suggest that presence of OPTC is related to a worse survival in patients with resectable pancreatic cancer. Future studies should investigate its possible role in selecting patients for specific treatment strategies. J. Surg. Oncol. 2016;114:743-751. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Willemijn Steen
- Department of Surgery, Onze Lieve Vrouwe Gasthuis, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Rachel Blom
- Department of Surgery, Onze Lieve Vrouwe Gasthuis, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Olivier Busch
- Department of Surgery, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Michael Gerhards
- Department of Surgery, Onze Lieve Vrouwe Gasthuis, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Marc Besselink
- Department of Surgery, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Frederike Dijk
- Department of Pathology, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Sebastiaan Festen
- Department of Surgery, Onze Lieve Vrouwe Gasthuis, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Perioperative chemotherapy is associated with a survival advantage in early stage adenocarcinoma of the pancreatic head. Surgery 2016; 160:714-24. [PMID: 27422328 DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2016.05.029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 39] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/16/2016] [Revised: 04/28/2016] [Accepted: 05/24/2016] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The value of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in the treatment of early stage pancreatic cancer is not yet clear. METHODS We evaluated patients from the National Cancer Data Base who underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy for clinical stage I and II pancreatic adenocarcinoma between 2006 and 2012. RESULTS In total, 7,881 patients were identified. Of these, 27.5% received no chemotherapy, 57.4% received adjuvant chemotherapy, 10.2% received neoadjuvant chemotherapy alone, and 4.9% received perioperative chemotherapy, both preoperative and postoperative chemotherapy. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy use (neoadjuvant chemotherapy alone and perioperative chemotherapy) increased from 12.0% in 2006 to 20.2% in 2012. Patients who received chemotherapy prior to the operation (neoadjuvant chemotherapy alone and perioperative chemotherapy) had greater rates of margin negative (80.2% vs 73.0%, P < .001) and node negative (58.2% vs 28.7%, P < .001) resections and shorter mean durations of stay (12.0 vs 11.1 days, P = .012) than those receiving either adjuvant chemotherapy or no chemotherapy at all. There were no differences in 30-day unplanned readmissions (P = .074) and 90-day mortality (P = .227). On Cox survival analysis, adjusted for clinical variables including age and comorbid disease, patients undergoing perioperative chemotherapy, adjuvant chemotherapy, and neoadjuvant chemotherapy alone demonstrated significantly improved overall survival relative to that of patients undergoing resection alone (all P < .001). Patients receiving perioperative chemotherapy demonstrated a significant overall survival advantage compared with those receiving adjuvant chemotherapy (hazard ratio 0.75; 95% confidence interval, 0.65-0.85). Neoadjuvant chemotherapy alone had a marginal overall survival benefit compared with adjuvant chemotherapy (hazard ratio 0.89; 95% confidence interval, 0.81-0.98). CONCLUSION Early stage pancreatic cancer patients who receive perioperative chemotherapy have better overall survival than those receiving no chemotherapy, adjuvant chemotherapy, or neoadjuvant chemotherapy alone. Patterns of postoperative morbidity are similar regardless of the sequence of therapy. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy should be considered for patients presenting with early stage pancreatic cancer.
Collapse
|
15
|
Silvestris N, Longo V, Cellini F, Reni M, Bittoni A, Cataldo I, Partelli S, Falconi M, Scarpa A, Brunetti O, Lorusso V, Santini D, Morganti A, Valentini V, Cascinu S. Neoadjuvant multimodal treatment of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2015; 98:309-24. [PMID: 26653573 DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2015.11.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/14/2015] [Revised: 09/14/2015] [Accepted: 11/19/2015] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Treatment of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is increasingly multidisciplinary, with neoadjuvant strategies (chemotherapy, radiation, and surgery) administered in patients with resectable, borderline resectable, or locally advanced disease. The rational supporting this management is the achievement of both higher margin-negative resections and conversion rates into potentially resectable disease and in vivo assessment of novel therapeutics. International guidelines suggest an initial staging of the disease followed by a multidisciplinary approach, even considering the lack of a treatment approach to be considered as standard in this setting. This review will focus on both literature data supporting these guidelines and on new opportunities related to current more active chemotherapy regimens. An analysis of the pathological assessment of response to therapy and the potential role of target therapies and translational biomarkers and ongoing clinical trials of significance will be discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicola Silvestris
- Medical Oncology Unit, National Cancer Research Centre "Giovanni Paolo II", Bari, Italy.
| | - Vito Longo
- Medical Oncology Unit, 'Mons R Dimiccoli' Hospital, Barletta, Italy
| | - Francesco Cellini
- Radiation Oncology Department, Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, Rome, Italy
| | - Michele Reni
- Medical Oncology Department, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milano, Italy
| | - Alessandro Bittoni
- Medical Oncology Clinic, AOU Ospedali Riuniti, Polytechnic University of the Marche Region, Ancona, Italy
| | - Ivana Cataldo
- ARC-NET Research Centre, University of Verona, Italy
| | - Stefano Partelli
- Pancreatic Unit, Department of Surgery, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Massimo Falconi
- Pancreatic Unit, Department of Surgery, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Aldo Scarpa
- ARC-NET Research Centre, University of Verona, Italy
| | - Oronzo Brunetti
- Medical Oncology Unit, National Cancer Research Centre "Giovanni Paolo II", Bari, Italy
| | - Vito Lorusso
- Medical Oncology Unit, National Cancer Research Centre "Giovanni Paolo II", Bari, Italy
| | - Daniele Santini
- Medical Oncology Unit, University Campus Biomedico, Roma, Italy
| | - Alessio Morganti
- Radiation Oncology Center, Dept. of Experimental, Diagnostic and Specialty Medicine - DIMES, University of Bologna, Italy
| | - Vincenzo Valentini
- Radiation Oncology Department, Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, Rome, Italy
| | - Stefano Cascinu
- Medical Oncology Clinic, AOU Ospedali Riuniti, Polytechnic University of the Marche Region, Ancona, Italy
| |
Collapse
|