A phase I study of talazoparib (BMN 673) combined with carboplatin and paclitaxel in patients with advanced solid tumors (NCI9782)

An 19F NMR fragment-based approach for the discovery and development of BRCA2-RAD51 inhibitors to pursuit synthetic lethality in combination with PARP inhibition in pancreatic cancer

The BRCA2-RAD51 interaction remains an intriguing target for cancer drug discovery due to its vital role in DNA damage repair mechanisms, which cancer cells become particularly reliant on. Moreover, RAD51 has many synthetically lethal partners, including PARP1-2, which can be exploited to induce synthetic lethality in cancer. In this study, we established a 19F-NMR-fragment based approach to identify RAD51 binders, leading to two initial hits. A subsequent SAR program identified 46 as a low micromolar inhibitor of the BRCA2-RAD51 interaction. 46 was tested in different pancreatic cancer cell lines, to evaluate its ability to inhibit the homologous recombination DNA repair pathway, mediated by BRCA2-RAD51 and trigger synthetic lethality in combination with the PARP inhibitor talazoparib, through the induction of apoptosis. Moreover, we further analyzed the 46/talazoparib combination in 3D pancreatic cancer models. Overall, 46 showed its potential as a tool to evaluate the RAD51/PARP1-2 synthetic lethality mechanism, along with providing a prospect for further inhibitors development.

Discovery of novel 2,3,4,5-tetrahydrospiro[benzo[c]azepine-1,1'-cyclohexan]-5-ol derivatives as PARP-1 inhibitors

As an essential marker of cancer treatment, PARP-1 inhibitors could effectively kill tumor cells through a mechanism known as synthetic lethality and are used to treat a variety of cancers. In order to explore novel PARP-1 inhibitors, a series of 22 novel erythrina derivatives were reported and preliminarily explored their mechanism of action. The antitumor activities against four human cancer cell lines including A549, OVCAR-3, HCT-116, and MCF-7 were evaluated, and the preliminary SARs were summarized. Among them, compound 11b exhibited better anti-proliferative effects against A549 cells (IC50 = 1.95 µM). The SI results showed that compound 11b had low toxicity. Moreover, compound 11b displayed excellent PARP-1 inhibitory activities with IC50 values of 19.24 nM. In addition, molecular docking studies provided the rational binding modes of compound 11b in complexes with PARP-1. The flow cytometry assays revealed that compound 11b could induce apoptosis of A549 cells (P < 0.001). Simultaneously, compound 11b could effectively reduce the formation of PAR (P < 0.001). The ADMET prediction results indicated compound 11b had similar properties to rucaparib. Collectively, compound 11b has potential research value for further investigation.

DNA repair biomarkers to guide usage of combined PARP inhibitors and chemotherapy: A meta-analysis and systematic review

PURPOSE

The addition of PARP inhibitors to chemotherapy has been assessed in > 80 clinical trials across multiple malignancies, on the premise that PARP inhibitors will increase chemotherapy effectiveness regardless of whether cancers have underlying disruption of DNA repair pathways. Consequently, the majority of combination therapy trials have been performed on patients without biomarker selection, despite the use of homologous recombination deficiency to dictate use of PARP inhibitors in the maintenance setting. An unresolved question is whether biomarkers are needed to identify patients who respond to combination PARP inhibitors and chemotherapy.

METHODS

A systematic literature review identified studies using PARP inhibitors in combination with chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone, where the study included a biomarker of DNA repair function (BRCA1, BRCA2, homologous recombination deficiency test, ATM, ERCC1, SLFN11). Hazard ratios (HR) were pooled in a meta-analysis using generic inverse-variance, and fixed or random effects modelling. Subgroup analyses were conducted on biomarker selection and type of malignancy.

RESULTS

Nine studies comprising 2547 patients met the inclusion criteria. Progression-free survival (PFS) was significantly better in patients with a DNA repair biomarker (HR: 0.57, 95% CI: 0.48-0.68, p < 0.00001), but there was no benefit in patients who lacked a biomarker (HR: 0.94, 95% CI: 0.82-1.08, p = 0.38). Subgroup analysis showed that BRCA status and SLFN11 biomarkers could predict benefit, and biomarker-driven benefit occurred in ovarian, breast and small cell lung cancers. The addition of PARP inhibitors to chemotherapy was associated with increased grade 3/4 side effects, and particularly neutropenia.

CONCLUSIONS

Combination therapy only improves PFS in patients with identifiable DNA repair biomarkers. This indicates that PARP inhibitors do not sensitise patients to chemotherapy treatment, except where their cancer has a homologous recombination defect, or an alternative biomarker of altered DNA repair. While effective in patients with DNA repair biomarkers, there is a risk of high-grade haematological side-effects with the use of combination therapy. Thus, the benefit in PFS from combination therapy must be weighed against potential adverse effects, as individual arms of treatment can also confer benefit.

Identification and evaluation of a novel PARP1 inhibitor for the treatment of triple-negative breast cancer

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is a particularly invasive subtype of breast cancer and usually has a poor prognosis due to the lack of effective therapeutic targets. Approximately 25% of TNBC patients carry a breast cancer susceptibility gene1/2 (BRCA1/2) mutation. Clinically, PARP1 inhibitors have been approved for the treatment of patients with BRCA1/2-mutated breast cancer through the mechanism of synthetic lethality. In this study, we identified compound 6 {systematic name: 2-[2-(4-Hydroxy-phenyl)-vinyl]-3H-quinazolin-4-one} as a novel PARP1 inhibitor from established virtual screening methods. Compound 6 exerted stronger PARP1 inhibitory activity and anti-cancer activity as compared to olaparib in BRCA1-mutated TNBC cells and TNBC patient-derived organoids. Unexpectedly, we found that compound 6 also significantly inhibited cell viability, proliferation, and induced cell apoptosis in BRCA wild-type TNBC cells. To further elucidate the underlying molecular mechanism, we found that tankyrase (TNKS), a vital promoter of homologous-recombination repair, was a potential target of compound 6 by cheminformatics analysis. Compound 6 not only decreased the expression of PAR, but also down-regulated the expression of TNKS, thus resulting in significant DNA single-strand and double-strand breaks in BRCA wild-type TNBC cells. In addition, we demonstrated that compound 6 enhanced the sensitivity of BRCA1-mutated and wild-type TNBC cells to chemotherapy including paclitaxel and cisplatin. Collectively, our study identified a novel PARP1 inhibitor, providing a therapeutic candidate for the treatment of TNBC.

A phase 1 study of veliparib (ABT-888) plus weekly carboplatin and paclitaxel in advanced solid malignancies, with an expansion cohort in triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) (ETCTN 8620)

BACKGROUND

Veliparib is a poly-ADP-ribose polymerase (PARP) inhibitor, and it has clinical activity with every 3 weeks carboplatin and paclitaxel. In breast cancer, weekly paclitaxel is associated with improved overall survival. We aimed to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) of veliparib with weekly carboplatin and paclitaxel as well as safety, pharmacokinetics, and preliminary clinical activity in triple negative breast cancer (TNBC).

METHODS

Patients with locally advanced/metastatic solid tumors and adequate organ function were eligible. A standard 3 + 3 dose-escalation design was followed by a TNBC expansion cohort. Veliparib doses ranging from 50 to 200 mg orally bid were tested with carboplatin (AUC 2) and paclitaxel (80 mg/m2) given weekly in a 21-day cycle. Adverse events (AE) were evaluated by CTCAE v4.0, and objective response rate (ORR) was determined by RECIST 1.1.

RESULTS

Thirty patients were enrolled, of whom 22 had TNBC. Two dose-limiting toxicities were observed. The RP2D was determined to be 150 mg PO bid veliparib with weekly carboplatin and paclitaxel 2 weeks on, 1 week off, based on hematologic toxicity requiring dose reduction in the first 5 cycles of treatment. The most common grade 3/4 AEs included neutropenia, anemia, and thrombocytopenia. PK parameters of veliparib were comparable to single-agent veliparib. In 23 patients with evaluable disease, the ORR was 65%. In 19 patients with TNBC with evaluable disease, the ORR was 63%.

CONCLUSION

Veliparib can be safely combined with weekly paclitaxel and carboplatin, and this triplet combination has promising clinical activity.

Potential role for protein kinase D inhibitors in prostate cancer

Protein kinase D (PrKD), a novel serine-threonine kinase, belongs to a family of calcium calmodulin kinases that consists of three isoforms: PrKD1, PrKD2, and PrKD3. The PrKD isoforms play a major role in pathologic processes such as cardiac hypertrophy and cancer progression. The charter member of the family, PrKD1, is the most extensively studied isoform. PrKD play a dual role as both a proto-oncogene and a tumor suppressor depending on the cellular context. The duplicity of PrKD can be highlighted in advanced prostate cancer (PCa) where expression of PrKD1 is suppressed whereas the expressions of PrKD2 and PrKD3 are upregulated to aid in cancer progression. As understanding of the PrKD signaling pathways has been better elucidated, interest has been garnered in the development of PrKD inhibitors. The broad-spectrum kinase inhibitor staurosporine acts as a potent PrKD inhibitor and is the most well-known; however, several other novel and more specific PrKD inhibitors have been developed over the last two decades. While there is tremendous potential for PrKD inhibitors to be used in a clinical setting, none has progressed beyond preclinical trials due to a variety of challenges. In this review, we focus on PrKD signaling in PCa and the potential role of PrKD inhibitors therein, and explore the possible clinical outcomes based on known function and expression of PrKD isoforms at different stages of PCa.