A comparative study of diagnostic accuracy in 3026 pleural biopsies and matched pleural effusion cytology with clinical correlation

An Updated Contextual Approach to Mesothelial Proliferations in Pleural Effusion Cytology Leveraging Morphology, Ancillary Studies, and Novel Biomarkers

CONTEXT.—

Pleural effusions are common cytologic specimens that can be leveraged to make diagnoses of malignancy that drive appropriate patient management. However, the overlap in morphologic features of reactive mesothelial proliferations, mesotheliomas, and adenocarcinomas can create diagnostic pitfalls in the cytologic evaluation of pleural fluids.

OBJECTIVE.—

To review the morphologic spectrum of benign and malignant mesothelial proliferations in pleural effusions, as well as relevant clinicoradiologic contexts and ancillary tests.

DATA SOURCES.—

Existing scientific and clinical literature as of January 2023.

CONCLUSIONS.—

We can leverage the knowledge of several overlapping morphologic features, clinicoradiologic scenarios, and immunohistochemical studies to enhance the diagnostic accuracy of pleural effusion cytology to appropriately delineate cases of adenocarcinoma, reactive mesothelial proliferation, and mesothelioma. Earlier diagnosis through cytology, particularly in cases of mesothelioma, may positively impact patient treatment options and prognosis.

Liposarcoma Involving Serous Fluid Cavities-A Case Series Illustrating Clinical Implications and the Diagnostic Role of Exfoliative Cytology

Introduction: Cytological diagnosis of sarcomas requires detailed cytomorphological assessment and integration of immunocytochemistry and/or molecular testing. The role of exfoliative cytology, as compared to aspiration cytology, is less understood. This case series describes well-differentiated/dedifferentiated liposarcomas in effusions, with cytomorphological features, ancillary test results and clinical outcomes detailed. Methods: A computerized search of the department pathology archives was performed for sarcomatous effusions with histological diagnosis or clinical history of well-differentiated/dedifferentiated liposarcoma. Clinical progress, cytology slides, immunocytochemistry and molecular test results were reviewed. Results: Six patients were identified. In 5 patients with clinical follow up, 4 (80%) were deceased within 5 months of malignant effusion. One patient was alive with 12 years disease-free survival after radical resection with adjuvant radiotherapy. Three patients showed dedifferentiation on histology, and high-grade (dedifferentiated) tumor cells were present in effusion cytology of 2 patients. Two showed well-differentiated components only on biopsy, but high-grade (dedifferentiated) tumor cells were identified in cytology. The high-grade tumor cells displayed marked nuclear irregularity, enlargement, size variation, with macronucleoli and multinucleation. Well-differentiated lipomatous components were demonstrated in 4 patients (66.7%), comprising of multivacuolated lipoblasts and atypical lipocytes. CDK4 and MDM2 immunoreactivity in all 3 cases with cell blocks, and CDK4 and MDM2 amplification in one were successfully demonstrated. Conclusion: Lipomatous and dedifferentiated components can be sampled and cytomorphologically identified on effusion fluids of liposarcomas, with sufficient cellularity for immunocytochemistry and molecular testing. Although generally associated with poor prognosis, long disease-free survival with sarcomatous effusion is possible with radical surgery and adjuvant treatment.

A comparative study of diagnostic accuracy in 3026 pleural biopsies and matched pleural effusion cytology with clinical correlation: A methodological issue

AIM

After reading the article by Ivan K. Poon et al. Certain issues regarding the methodology must be addressed.

RESULT

First, it was not sufficient using only sensitivity and specificity. Second, we think the receiver operator characteristic curve (ROC) as well as the index of area under curve (AUC) could better be demonstrated in this, it was not sufficient using only sensitivity and specificity. Second, we think the receiver operator characteristic curve (ROC) as well as the index of area under curve (AUC) could better be demonstrated in this article for a more comprehensive understanding of this diagnostic test accuracy when comparing different tests.

CONCLUSION

With using more comprehensive indexes including Youden's index, LR and AUC, the conclusions of Ivan K. Poon and his colleagues would be sodified.

EGFR testing in paraffin-embedded cell block cytology material is reliable with increased detection for effusion fluid

INTRODUCTION

Cytology is integral to lung cancer diagnosis. Aspiration and exfoliative fluid specimens represent valuable tumor material for molecular testing. In this study, a large retrospective cohort of EGFR tests was reviewed to address the adequacy, detection and discrepancy rate in tests performed with cytology material.

METHODS

EGFR tests performed from 2013 to 2022 were reviewed and classified by the modality of obtaining tissue and by tissue type. EGFR tests for tissue specimens were performed on unstained sections of paraffin-embedded material on glass slides. Adequacy and types of mutation(s) detected were analysed. Cases where multiple EGFR testing was performed on the same patient were reviewed for discordance.

RESULTS

There were 5,504 tests retrieved, with 1,855, 3,607 and 42 performed on cytology, surgical and blood specimens. Lung and excision specimens were more often adequate (p < 0.001). Cytology material showed lower adequacy rates (p < 0.01). EGFR detection (positive) rate was higher in pleural fluid compared to biopsy (59.8 % vs 50.7 %, p = 0.022), but similar between lung and lymph node cytology and non-cytology specimens. Effusion fluid specimens had the highest adequacy (81.5 %) and detection rate (59.3 %) among cytology specimens (p < 0.001). Four (4.4 %) cases showed discordant results in cytology specimens. Two were false negatives in the non-cytology material. Only in one case was cytology material genuinely discrepant. The remaining discordance was attributed to the interval treatment effect.

CONCLUSION

The findings support that EGFR testing in cell block is reliable and complements tissue material. In addition, pleural fluid appears to be superior to pleural biopsies for molecular testing.

Comparison of GATA3, GCDFP15, Mammaglobin and SOX10 Immunocytochemistry in Aspirates of Metastatic Breast Cancer

Introduction: Metastatic cancers are frequently detected on fine-needle aspiration (FNA) cytology, and confirmation of metastatic breast cancer often requires immunocytochemistry. Tissue provisioning for FNA specimens is important. In this study, GATA3, gross cystic disease fluid protein-15 (GCDFP15), mammaglobin (MMG), and SOX10 were performed on cell block preparations from aspirates of histologically confirmed metastatic breast cancers. The diagnostic performance of single markers and combinations of these markers were investigated with the aim to construct a tissue-efficient immunopanel. Methodology: Aspirates of metastatic breast cancer with corresponding histology and biomarker (estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), HER2 and ki67) profile were retrieved. ER, GATA3, GCDFP15, MMG and SOX10 immunostains were performed on cell block sections and their expressions were assessed and compared. Results: Immunostaining was performed on a total of 115 aspirates. GATA3 showed the highest expression, followed by MMG, GCDFP15 and SOX10. Twenty-three, five and five cases expressed GATA3, MMG and SOX10 only. The five cases expressing SOX10 only were ER negative, and SOX10 expression was negatively associated with ER (p = 0.001), MMG (p = 0.001), GCDFP15 (p = 0.010) and GATA3 (p = 0.002), whereas GATA3 expression showed positive correlation with ER positivity (p < 0.001). MMG and GCDFP15 showed association with high Ki67 (p < 0.05), and no correlations were found with HER2 expression. Conclusion: In this cohort, GATA3 was the most sensitive single marker. The addition of MMG and SOX10 increases the sensitivity for detection of ER positive and ER negative breast cancers, respectively. These findings support the use of a combination of GATA3/MMG/SOX10 for confirmation of metastatic breast cancer.