Real-world data on the efficacy and safety of immune-checkpoint inhibitors in elderly patients with non-small cell lung cancer

Immunotherapy and Radiotherapy for Older Patients with Locally Advanced Non-Metastatic Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Who Are Not Candidates for or Decline Surgery and Chemotherapy: A Practical Proposal by the International Geriatric Radiotherapy Group

The standard of care for locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is either surgery combined with chemotherapy pre- or postoperatively or concurrent chemotherapy and radiotherapy. However, older and frail patients may not be candidates for surgery and chemotherapy due to the high mortality risk and are frequently referred to radiotherapy alone, which is better tolerated but carries a high risk of disease recurrence. Recently, immunotherapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) may induce a high response rate among cancer patients with positive programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression. Immunotherapy is also well tolerated among older patients. Laboratory and clinical studies have reported synergy between radiotherapy and ICI. The combination of ICI and radiotherapy may improve local control and survival for NSCLC patients who are not candidates for surgery and chemotherapy or decline these two modalities. The International Geriatric Radiotherapy Group proposes a protocol combining radiotherapy and immunotherapy based on the presence or absence of PD-L1 to optimize the survival of those patients.

Effect of polypharmacy on the outcomes of older patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer treated with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors: A retrospective cohort study

INTRODUCTION

The effect of polypharmacy on older patients with cancer is unclear. This study aimed to explore the effect of polypharmacy on the outcomes of treatment in older patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the records of older patients (aged ≥65 years) with advanced NSCLC who received PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors with or without platinum-based chemotherapy as first-line treatment from March 2016 to December 2020. Patients with driver oncogenes or Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (PS) ≥2 were excluded. Polypharmacy was defined as receiving five or more oral or inhaled medications at baseline. We compared the progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and mean cumulative length of hospital stays between the polypharmacy and non-polypharmacy groups.

RESULTS

A total of 122 patients, with a median age of 72 years (range, 65-89 years), were included in the analysis. Of the patients, 34 (27.8%) had a PS of 0 and 68 (55.7%) had a PD-L1 tumor proportion score (TPS) of ≥50%. The median number of oral or inhaled medications was 4 (range, 0-12), and 60 (49.1%) patients were taking ≥5 medications (polypharmacy). Age and Charlson Comorbidity Index score were significantly higher in the polypharmacy group (P = 0.01 and P < 0.001, respectively). Compared with the non-polypharmacy group, the polypharmacy group had a similar median PFS (6.7 vs. 8.5 months, P = 0.94) and a shorter median OS (17.3 vs. 26.0 months, P = 0.04). In the polypharmacy group, the adjusted hazard ratio for OS (adjusted for age, PS, and PD-L1 TPS) was 1.65 (95% confidence interval, 1.04-2.86, P = 0.03). Patients in the polypharmacy group had longer hospital stays (46.3 ± 7.5 vs. 27.7 ± 4.1 days/person, P < 0.05) and more emergency hospitalizations (1.6 ± 0.3 vs. 0.8 ± 0.1 times/person, P < 0.05) during the first year.

DISCUSSION

Polypharmacy was associated with shorter survival time and longer hospitalization in older patients with advanced NSCLC receiving first-line immunotherapy with or without chemotherapy.

Optimization of treatment strategies for elderly patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer

Lung cancer stands as a malignant neoplasm bearing the highest burden of morbidity and mortality within the elderly population on a global scale. Among the lung cancer subtypes, non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) prevails as the most prevalent. As age advances, elderly patients often present with an increased prevalence of comorbidities, diminished organ reserve function, and alterations in drug pharmacokinetics, including absorption, distribution, metabolism, and clearance. These factors collectively contribute to a reduction in their capacity to tolerate therapeutic interventions. Regrettably, there exists a paucity of research data and evidence regarding the management of elderly patients afflicted by advanced lung cancer. This article endeavors to compile and elucidate strategies for the enhancement of treatment approaches, with the aim of aiding clinical decision-making. Prior to the selection of clinical treatment modalities for elderly patients with advanced NSCLC, a comprehensive assessment should be conducted, taking into account various facets, including tumor characteristics, patient age, physiological status, and the presence of comorbidities. The treatment strategy should be implemented in a tiered fashion, thereby affording the opportunity for the tailoring of individualized therapeutic approaches for elderly patients afflicted by advanced NSCLC. The demographic of elderly patients confronting advanced NSCLC presents a complex landscape marked by intricate underlying conditions, necessitating the imperative optimization of treatment strategies.

Real-World Efficacy and Safety of Durvalumab Administration Following Chemoradiotherapy in Elderly Patients With Unresectable Locally Advanced Nonsmall Cell Lung Cancer: A Multicenter, Retrospective Study

BACKGROUND

The PACIFIC trial established durvalumab administration after chemoradiotherapy as the standard of care for unresectable locally advanced nonsmall cell lung cancer (LA-NSCLC). However, the efficacy and safety of durvalumab in elderly patients aged 75 years or above remains unclear. This study aimed to investigate the real-world efficacy and safety of durvalumab for LA-NSCLC, with a specific focus on elderly patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We reviewed 214 patients who received durvalumab out of 278 patients with unresectable LA-NSCLC who underwent chemoradiotherapy at 7 institutions between July 2018 and March 2022. Propensity score matching (PSM) analysis was performed to evaluate the efficacy of durvalumab in elderly patients.

RESULTS

The 2-year progression-free survival (PFS) and 2-year overall survival (OS) rates were 42.2% (95% confidence interval [CI], 34.7%-49.5%) and 77.1% (95% CI, 70.1-82.7%), respectively. Grade ≥ 3 immune-related adverse events (irAEs) occurred in 8.2% of patients. PSM analysis revealed that OS was significantly shorter in elderly patients (≥ 75 years) than in younger patients (< 75 years) (hazard ratio [HR]; 95% CI, 1.39-8.99; P = .008), whereas PFS did not differ significantly between the 2 groups (HR: 1.50, 95% CI, 0.84-2.68, P = .169). The frequency of irAEs did not differ between these groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The real-world efficacy and safety of durvalumab administration following chemoradiotherapy for LA-NSCLC coincided with the PACIFIC trial's findings. Disease control achieved with this protocol did not differ significantly between elderly and younger patients but had acceptable tolerability, demonstrating its benefit even in elderly LA-NSCLC patients aged 75 years or above.

Real-World Prevalence and Tolerability of Immune-Related Adverse Events in Older Adults with Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Multi-Institutional Retrospective Study

With cancer diagnosis occurring at older ages, the use of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has extended to older adults. However, the safety of immune-related adverse events (irAEs) in this population remains unclear and relies on data extrapolated from younger adults. This multicenter retrospective study aimed to examine irAE prevalence and tolerability in older adults. We included 436 patients with non-small lung cancer undergoing ICI therapy and dichotomized them into two age groups (< or ≥75 years). Incidence of any irAE grade, grade ≥3 irAEs, and steroid usage after irAE occurrence was similar between younger (n = 332) and older groups (n = 104). While the younger patients with irAEs showed prolonged overall survival in the 12-month landmark Kaplan-Meier analysis (Hazard ratio (HR) 0.59, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.38-0.89, p = 0.013), the older cohort did not (HR 0.80, 95% CI 0.36-1.78, p = 0.588). Although no differences were observed with ICI continuation or re-challenge after irAE onset, the elderly cohort had double the irAE cases that required a transition to best supportive care (BSC) (11.3% vs. 22.4%, p = 0.026). In conclusion, although irAE prevalence remains consistent regardless of age, the increased conversion to BSC post-irAE onset in older adults suggests diminished tolerability and the potential absence of favorable prognosis associated with irAEs in this population.

Safety of flexible bronchoscopy and clinical course for elderly patients with suspected primary lung cancer

BACKGROUND

There have been several reports demonstrating the safety of flexible bronchoscopy (FB) in the elderly, but none have focused specifically on lung cancer, which is a frequent biopsy procedure.

METHODS

In this study, we retrospectively evaluated the safety of FB and subsequent treatment in elderly patients with suspected primary lung cancer. Elderly patients were defined as 75 years of age or older.

RESULTS

A total of 141 patients, 77 in the elderly group and 64 in the nonelderly group, were reviewed. The median age of the elderly group was 80 years. Transbronchial lung biopsy was performed in more than 80% of all patients. Primary lung cancer was diagnosed in 42 (54.4%) of the elderly group and 35 (54.7%) of the nonelderly group (p = 0.38). Approximately 70% of the elderly patients with a confirmed diagnosis were treated, while more than half of the undiagnosed elderly patients had best supportive care. Complications such as bleeding, pneumothorax, fever, and pneumonia were similar in the elderly and nonelderly groups.

CONCLUSIONS

This study suggests that flexible bronchoscopy can be performed as safely in the elderly as in the nonelderly. Furthermore, even elderly patients may have a greater chance of receiving treatment when a definitive diagnosis is achieved.

The landscape of immune therapy in vulnerable patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a narrative review

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

The clinical development of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has led to substantial advances in the treatment of lung cancer. In particular, the contribution of ICIs to the long-term survival of certain patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has been reported. With the accumulated experience in the use of ICIs, numerous studies have documented the efficacy and safety of ICIs in patients with diverse backgrounds, including those with problematic indications for drug therapy. In the current review, we summarize the most recent literature-based findings on ICI administration in vulnerable patients with NSCLC and provide an overview of the current status and prospects of ICIs.

METHODS

Herein, we defined vulnerable as the group of patients with NSCLC and performance status (PS) ≥2 (poor PS), advanced age (≥75 years), or cancer cachexia. We conducted a narrative review of the literature on the efficacy and safety of ICIs in vulnerable patients with advanced NSCLC.

KEY CONTENT AND FINDINGS

Among the vulnerable patient group, poor PS was a strong, poor prognostic factor, even in patients undergoing ICI therapy. ICI therapy in older patients can be effective, although adverse events (AEs) should be carefully monitored. The efficacy of ICI therapy in patients with cancer cachexia is poor, with further therapeutic development warranted.

CONCLUSIONS

Although prior studies have evaluated lung cancer pharmacotherapy in various vulnerable populations, clinical studies on the application of ICIs in patients with vulnerable NSCLC are lacking in both number and quality. Further development of these therapeutic agents, with the emergence of additional evidence regarding their appropriate use in this population, is expected.