Associations between pathologic tumor features and preadjuvant therapy cognitive performance in women diagnosed with breast cancer

The Cancer Genomic Integration Model for Symptom Science (CGIMSS): A Biopsychosocial Framework

Current nursing research has characterized symptom clusters and trajectories in individuals with breast cancer. The existing literature describes the relationship between symptoms and biological variables and the potential moderating effects of individual and social factors. The genomic profiling of breast cancer has also been an area of much recent research. Emerging evidence indicates that incorporating cancer genomics into symptom science research can aid in the prognostication of symptoms and elucidate targets for symptom management interventions. The aim of this paper is to outline a model to integrate cancer genomics into symptom science research, illustrated using breast cancer and psychoneurological (PN) symptoms as an example. We present a review of the current literature surrounding breast cancer genomics (specifically cancer genomic instability) and the biological underpinnings of the PN symptom cluster. Advances in both of these areas indicate that inflammation may serve as the bridge between cancer genomics and the PN symptom cluster. We also outline how the integration of cancer genomics into symptom science research synergizes with current research of individual and social factors in relation to symptoms. This model aims to provide a framework to guide future biopsychosocial symptom science research that can elucidate new predictive methods and new targets for intervention.

Cognitive function and breast cancer molecular subtype before and after chemotherapy

Chemotherapy-related cognitive impairment has been reported in patients with breast cancer and received growing attention due to increased survival rate. However, cognitive outcome according to pathological tumor features, especially human epidermal growth factor receptor (HER2) status, has not been clearly elucidated. Despite its potential link with cognitive status through neuroinflammatory response, existing research is sparse and limited to cross-sectional studies. In this observational cohort study, 52 breast cancer patients received a series of neuropsychological examinations before and after chemotherapy. Patients' performances were compared with normative data, and analyzed with Reliable Change Indices and mixed-model analysis of covariance. Results showed that there was a higher percentage of HER2+ patients than HER2- patients who showed defective attention and processing speed before chemotherapy, and that there were more patients with HER2+ status showing cognitive decline on tests of attention and executive functions following chemotherapy. Group-wise analyses confirmed the foregoing pattern and further revealed that patients with HER2+ status also tended to deteriorate more in verbal memory after chemotherapy. These findings indicate that HER2 overexpression may serve as prognostic factors that help explain the heterogeneous cognitive outcome in breast cancer survivors. Further studies are needed to replicate this finding and delineate the underlying mechanisms.

COMT rs737865 mediates chemobrain in breast cancer patients with various levels of Ki-67

Previous findings have indicated that catechol-O-methyltransferase (COMT) may be a genetic risk factor for chemobrain. However, the mediation of chemobrain by COMT polymorphisms in breast cancer patients with various levels of Ki-67 remains unknown. The current research assessed the genetic risk across COMT genotypes for chemobrain in breast cancer patients with various levels of Ki-67. Breast cancer patients (65 with Ki-67<14%, 75 with Ki-67>14%) completed cognitive tests before and after adjuvant chemotherapy, and three single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) of COMT (rs165599, rs4680, rs737865) were genotyped from peripheral blood. Lower cognitive test results in breast cancer patients were displayed in those before chemotherapy. Furthermore, the event-based prospective memory (EBPM) scores of patients in the Ki-67>14% group were worse than those in the patients in the Ki-67<14% group after chemotherapy (z=-7.51, P<0.01), but the time-based prospective memory (TBPM) scores of the two groups were not significantly different. The COMT rs737865 A/G genotype was associated with memory protection (codominant model: adjusted odds ratio (OR)=0.135, 95% CI=0.026-0.706, P=0.018), and A/G genotype carriers exhibited better performance on the EBPM test than the A/A genotype. Levels of Ki-67 were likely to be associated with EBPM decline in breast cancer patients. Taken together, COMT rs737865 polymorphisms are a potential genetic risk factor for chemobrain in breast cancer patients with various levels of Ki-67.

Association of markers of tumor aggressivity and cognition in women with breast cancer before adjuvant treatment: The Thinking and Living with Cancer Study

PURPOSE

Tumor features associated with aggressive cancers may affect cognition prior to systemic therapy. We evaluated associations of cognition prior to adjuvant therapy and tumor aggressivity in older breast cancer patients.

METHODS

Women diagnosed with non-metastatic breast cancer (n = 705) ages 60-98 were enrolled from August 2010-March 2020. Cognition was measured post-surgery, pre-systemic therapy using self-reported (FACT-Cog Perceived Cognitive Impairment [PCI]) and objective tests of attention, processing speed, and executive function (APE domain) and learning and memory [LM domain]. Linear regression tested associations of pre-treatment tumor features and cognition, adjusting for age, race, and study site. HER2 positivity and higher stage (II/III vs. 0/I) were a priori predictors of cognition; in secondary analyses we explored associations of other tumor features and cognitive impairment (i.e., PCI score < 54 or having 2 tests < 1.5 SD or 1 test < 2 SD from the mean APE or LM domain score).

RESULTS

HER2 positivity and the hormone receptor negative/HER2 + molecular subtype were associated with lower adjusted mean self-reported cognition scores and higher impairment rates (p values < .05). Higher stage of disease was associated with lower objective performance in APE. Other tumor features were associated with cognition in unadjusted and adjusted models, including larger tumor size and lower PCI scores (p = 0.02). Tumor features were not related to LM.

CONCLUSIONS

Pre-adjuvant therapy cognition was associated with HER2 positivity and higher stage of disease and other features of aggressive tumors. Additional research is needed to confirm these results and assess potential mechanisms and clinical management strategies.

The COMT Genetic Factor Regulates Chemotherapy-Related Prospective Memory Impairment in Survivors With HER2-/+ Breast Cancer

Background

Previous findings indicated that polymorphism in gene catechol-O-methyltransferase (COMT) had been linked to chemotherapy-related cognitive impairment (CRCI). Nevertheless, the motivation of COMT polymorphisms in regulating cognitive impairment in breast cancer survivors with disparate status of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) was still vague.

Objective

The current research aimed to evaluate the regulation of the risk by COMT genotype on CRCI in breast cancer survivors with disparate status of HER2.

Methods

Breast cancer survivors (103 with HER2− and 118 with HER2+) underwent neuropsychological tests before and after chemotherapy, containing event- and time-based prospective memory (EBPM and TBPM). Three single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) were estimated by providing peripheral blood, containing COMT (rs165599, rs737865, and rs4680).

Results

The EBPM and TBPM performances was lower as compared with these before chemotherapy (z = −7.712, z = −2.403, respectively, p < 0.01). Furthermore, the EBPM and TBPM performances of HER2− group survivors were lower than those of HER2+ group survivors after chemotherapy (z = −7.181, p < 0.01; z = −2.205 p < 0.05, respectively). The survivors with COMT (rs165599) A/A genotype carriers had a meaningfully poorer chance of memory descend [dominant model: adjusted, OR = 2.21, CI (95%) = 1.156–4.225, p = 0.016] and showed better on TBPM test, relative to G/G genotype. Patients with the COMT (rs737865) A/G and G/G genotype showed protective function than the patients with the A/A and performed better on MMSE and TBPM tests.

Conclusion

The types of HER2 may be correlated to chemotherapy-related prospective memory impairments in breast cancer survivors. Furthermore, the COMT (rs165599, rs737865) polymorphisms were correlated to the risk of TBPM decline scores and possibly be a potential genetic identifying for increasing risk of CRCI in breast cancer patients with disparate status of HER2.

The many menopauses: searching the cognitive research literature for menopause types

Objective:

Recent evidence suggests that early or induced menopause increases the risk for cognitive impairment and dementia. Given the potential for different cognitive outcomes due to menopause types, it is important that present research on menopause and cognition distinguishes between types. The aim of this project was to determine to what extent research looking at cognition in postmenopausal women published in one year, 2016, accounted for menopausal type.

Methods:

We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, and PsychINFO using keywords and MeSH terms for menopause and cognition. We included any research paper reporting a cognitive outcome measure in a menopausal human population. Differentiation between the types of menopause was defined by four categories: undifferentiated, demographic differentiation (menopause type reported but not analyzed), partial differentiation (some but not all types analyzed), and full differentiation (menopause types factored into analysis, or recruitment of only one type).

Results:

Fifty research articles were found and analyzed. Differentiation was distributed as follows: undifferentiated, 38% (19 articles); demographic differentiation, 16% (8); partial differentiation, 28% (14); and full differentiation, 18% (9).

Conclusions:

This review revealed that although some clinical studies differentiated between the many menopauses, most did not. This may limit their relevance to clinical practice. We found that when menopause types are distinguished, the differing cognitive outcomes of each type are clarified, yielding the strongest evidence, which in turn will be able to inform best clinical practice for treating all women.

Cognitive function in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia: a cross-sectional study examining effects of disease and treatment

Cancer-related cognitive impairment (CRCI) has not been objectively assessed in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). It is currently unclear how much of CRCI is attributable to disease, treatment, or both. We used CLL as a novel model to study the differential roles of disease and treatment in CRCI. One hundred and fifty CLL patients (100 treatment-naïve and 50 chemotherapy-treated) including 84 patients with higher-risk of CLL progression completed objective neuropsychological tests. Sociodemographic-adjusted linear regression models examined cognitive outcomes in relation to risk and treatment. Higher-risk patients recalled two fewer words on a memory task (β = -1.8, 95%CI -3.3,-0.3) and took 15 s longer on an executive function task (β = 15.4, 95%CI 3.1, 27.6) than lower-risk patients, independent of treatment. Treated patients reported greater cognitive difficulties than treatment-naive patients (β = -6.1, 95%CI -10.1, -2.2) but did not perform worse on objective measures. Higher-risk patients experienced impairments in executive function and memory suggesting that disease biology contributes to CRCI independent of treatment.

Cognitive Effects of Cancer and Cancer Treatments

As the population of cancer survivors has grown into the millions, there has been increasing emphasis on understanding how the late effects of treatment affect survivors' ability to return to work/school, their capacity to function and live independently, and their overall quality of life. This review focuses on cognitive change associated with cancer and cancer treatments. Research in this area has progressed from a pharmacotoxicology perspective to a view of the cognitive change as a complex interaction of aspects of the treatment, vulnerability factors that increase risk for posttreatment cognitive decline, cancer biology, and the biology of aging. Methodological advances include the development of (a) measurement approaches that assess more fine-grained subcomponents of cognition based on cognitive neuroscience and (b) advanced statistical approaches. Conceptual issues that arise from this multidimensional perspective are described in relation to future directions, understanding of mechanisms, and development of innovative interventions.

MicroRNA-16-5p overexpression suppresses proliferation and invasion as well as triggers apoptosis by targeting VEGFA expression in breast carcinoma

MicroRNAs (miRNAs), a class of small noncoding RNA molecules, can manipulate the expressions of endogenous tumor-related genes, and are implicated in the development and progression of a wide type of tumors. In this study, the investigation from real-time quantitative PCR revealed that miRNA-16-5p was downregulated in breast carcinoma tissues and cells, coupled with the elevations of HIF-α and VEGFA protein expressions, compared with normal tissues. Lentiviral armed with miR-16-5p markedly increased the miR-16-5p levels in MCF-7 and MDA-MB-231 cells, compared to blank and NC groups, and miR-16-5p overexpression significantly inhibited the proliferation and colony formation in MCF-7 and MDA-MB-231 cells. Besides, miR-16-5p upregulation markedly induced apoptosis and reduced invasion ability in MCF-7 and MDA-MB-231 cells. Notably, VEGFA was direct target of miR-16-5p. Stepwise investigation from in vitro and in vivo experiments demonstrated that miR-16-5p overexpression suppressed tumor growth and reduced HIF-α and VEGFA expressions in breast carcinoma cells and nude mice tumor tissues. These findings provide novel insights into molecular mechanism involved in the roles of miR-16-5p in tumor development and progression of breast carcinoma, and thus manipulation of miR-16-5p may be a novel potential therapeutic target for future therapies of the patients with breast carcinoma.

Associations between pathologic tumor features and preadjuvant therapy cognitive performance in women diagnosed with breast cancer

Intertumor heterogeneity has been proposed as a potential mechanism to account for variability in cognitive performance in women diagnosed with breast cancer. The purpose of this study was to explore associations between variation in pathologic tumor features (PTFs) and variability in preadjuvant therapy cognitive performance in postmenopausal women newly diagnosed with early-stage breast cancer. Participants (N = 329) completed a comprehensive battery of neuropsychological tests to evaluate cognitive performance after primary surgery but prior to initiation of adjuvant anastrozole±chemotherapy. PTF data were abstracted from medical records. Robust multiple linear regression models were fit to estimate associations between individual PTFs and the cognitive function composite domain scores. All models controlled for age, estimated intelligence, and levels of depressive symptoms, anxiety, fatigue, and pain. Diagnosis of a HER2-positive tumor contributed to poorer verbal (b = -0.287, P = 0.018), visual (b = -0.270, P = 0.001), and visual working (b = -0.490, P < 0.001) memory performance compared to diagnosis of a HER2-negative tumor. Similarly, as HER2 immunohistochemistry classification score increased, verbal (b = -0.072, P = 0.093), visual (b = -0.081, P = 0.003), and visual working (b = -0.170, P < 0.001) memory performance score decreased. Associations with performance were also noted between location, focality/centricity, hormone receptor expression, cellular proliferation (i.e., Ki67), and Oncotype DX® Breast Cancer Assay Recurrence Score® .) Our results suggest that certain PTFs related to more aggressive tumor phenotypes or inferior breast cancer prognosis may be implicated in poorer preadjuvant therapy cognitive performance. Follow-up studies that include a cognitive assessment before primary surgery should be conducted to further delineate the role of intertumor heterogeneity on cognitive performance.