Application of biologics for ridge preservation/reconstruction after implant removal

Treatment strategies for dental implant removal: A literature review

Dental implants have been widely used with success, but long-term usage sometimes leads to implant loss. The purpose of this review was to summarize the etiology of early and late failure requiring dental implant removal and the treatment strategies for the removal of failed implants and reimplantation. Early failures are often caused by patient-related factors, such as smoking, diabetes, radiotherapy, bone quality, and periodontitis of the remaining natural teeth. The most common cause of late failure is peri-implantitis, followed by implant fracture and implant malpositioning. Implants should be removed if they are mobile or if their superstructure cannot be maintained (e.g., implant fracture). For peri-implantitis, implant removal should be determined based on the patient's age and esthetic needs, the implant site, and the severity of bone loss. Many reports have been published on implant removal techniques. The reverse torque technique should always be the first choice because of its low invasiveness. The weighted survival rate for the replacement of failed implants is 86.3%, with a much lower survival rate after the second or subsequent implantations. Therefore, patient-specific problems, such as smoking habits and bruxism, should be checked before reimplantation and controlled to the greatest extent possible.

Multidisciplinary management of implant failure: A case report

Key Clinical Message

This case report presents the interest of multidisciplinary management of extreme peri-implantitis requiring removal of implant emphasizing the different surgical and showing that the ovate pontic of conventional bridge is an optimal alternative for rehabilitation of the premolar sector, despite the fact that its main diffusion has been in the anterior sector due to the high demand aesthetic.

Abstract

Peri-implantitis leads to gradual peri-implant bone loss. Severe and extreme cases lead to complete implant failure and imply lost implants have to be removed. Residual ridge deformity management after implant removal is one of the factors contributing to improved aesthetic and functional results. Various grafting procedures have been developed to achieve this goal. This report describes a case of implant removal from the upper right first premolar due to advanced peri-implantitis in a 51-year-old female patient. Guided bone regeneration with a alloplastic bone graft and resorbable collagen membrane combined with roll pedicle connective tissue graftt was used for both socket and soft-tissue augmentation. This was combined with ovate design conventional provisional bridge. After a 6-month of healing phase, a perfect adaptation of the marginal gingiva around the provisional restoration was obtained. Cone beam computed tomography revealed significant bone fill and buccolingual dimensional stability. A conventional all-ceramic bridge with an oval pontic design was chosen as a definitive prosthetic solution to compensate for edentulism and maintain the good aesthetic results. According to the encouraging result obtained in this clinical case, the conventional prosthetic restoration associated with surgical reconstruction of failing tissues can be considered as a successful treatment in the case of advanced peri-implantitis requiring implant removal.

A Case Report of Atraumatic Tooth Extraction Followed by Ridge Preservation for Implant-Supported Prosthetic Rehabilitation Using an Alloplastic Bone Graft

Exodontia is a painful treatment that frequently causes the alveolar bone and surrounding soft tissues to be immediately destroyed and lost. With regard to the amount of resorption taking place after extraction, various treatment protocols aimed at preventing or decreasing alveolar ridge collapse have been presented over the past three decades. Ridge preservation is a clinical technique used to prevent the socket walls' bone resorption after tooth extraction. A 43‑year‑old female patient with a non-significant medical history visited the Department of Periodontology and Implantology with a chief complaint of a decayed tooth in the upper left back region (26) for three years and wants to get it replaced. The treatment option that was given to the patient was atraumatic extraction, followed by ridge preservation. A cautious and conservative treatment strategy is necessary to preserve the oral structures as they currently exist and are intact for a successful outcome; careful case selection and thorough treatment planning are crucial. Atraumatic tooth extraction is a procedure used to delicately remove a tooth while upholding the fundamental principles of preserving the surrounding bone and gingival structure. This will ultimately maximize the success of implant placement in terms of appearance and functionality.