Surgical management of gingival recessions in patients with refractory gingival pemphigus vulgaris: A multidisciplinary challenge

Regenerative potential of platelet concentrates in chronic oral mucosal lesions

Chronic oral mucosal diseases (COMDs) represent a significant challenge for clinicians and patients. They are commonly associated with chronic pain and negative effects on healing and patient's quality of life. Regenerative medicine including the use of biological autologous blood-derived substances (e.g., platelet concentrates [PCs]), has been reported to improve healing and reduce pain in orthopedic and maxillofacial surgeries as well as chronic oral mucosal diseases. In this review, we aim to describe the different types of PCs and their applications in the management of COMDs such as lichen planus, mucositis, pemphigus vulgaris, mucous membrane pemphigoid, and plasma cell mucositis, in terms of healing potential, pain control, and quality of life. Overall, PC applications seem to enhance healing and reduce pain in patients with COMDs. However, due to the small sample size and the lack of standardized clinical trials, further research is required to support these findings.

Topical applications of heterologous platelet rich plasma (PRP) for refractory gingival lesions in autoimmune blistering diseases

BACKGROUND

Recalcitrant gingival erosions, blisters and desquamative gingivitis are common features in oral autoimmune blistering diseases (AIBD). First line treatments include high-dosage corticosteroids and other immunosuppressive drugs, with several side effects and elevated number of recurrences. Autologous platelet-rich plasma (PRP) has been recently introduced as an alternative treatment and its use seems to be promising and safe.

METHODS

In this study we describe the use of topical application of heterologous PRP in nine patients affected by mucous membrane pemphigoid, with gingival lesions refractory to previous treatments. Topical applications of PRP were performed once a week for 2 months and the endpoint for clinical evaluation was set 3 months after the last session. Oral disease severity score (ODSS) and VAS scores for pain measurement were recorded before and after treatment.

RESULTS

The procedure was painless, well accepted, and free from adverse reactions. All patients (100%) reported a reduction in VAS whereas reduction in ODSS was observed in 89% of patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Within the limits of the study, topical heterologous PRP is a safe and promising procedure to be studied in future controlled randomized trials as adjuvant treatment for refractory gingival lesions in patients with AIBDs.