What issues bring primary school children to counselling? A service evaluation of presenting issues across 291 schools working with Place2Be

One-to-one counselling and school attendance in the UK: a single group pre-post study

OBJECTIVE

Absence rates remain high in UK schools, with negative implications for attainment, life chances and inequality. Reasons for non-attendance are complex but include psychosocial factors. Few UK-based studies have evaluated psychosocial interventions for school attendance outcomes or its moderators. This pre-post evaluation examined the potential influence of school-based one-to-one counselling on school attendance and possible moderators.

DESIGN AND SETTING

Secondary analysis of routine data, collected by a national mental health provider in primary and secondary schools.

PARTICIPANTS

7405 pupils aged 4-19 years, with complete school attendance records at Time1 (pre-counselling term) and Time2 (the term when counselling ended).

INTERVENTION

All participants received school-based one-to-one counselling with a trained counsellor between August 2016 and December 2019.

OUTCOMES

Percentage of school sessions attended (continuous) and persistent absence (binary; attending ≤90% of sessions) in a term. Potential moderators included sociodemographics, mental health and school engagement/enjoyment.

RESULTS

Median Time1 attendance was 96%. 23.6% of participants were persistently absent. The intervention was not associated with improved percentage attendance (0.028%, 95% CI -0.160-0.216%) but was associated with 18.5% reduced odds of persistent absence (OR=0.815, 95% CI 0.729-0.911). We identified five moderators of change in attendance (interaction terms p<0.05): age group (improvements for 4-9 s; worsening for 15-19 s), improvement for some ethnicities and lower parent/carer education. Mental health and school engagement/enjoyment co-varied with attendance in expected directions.

CONCLUSIONS

One-to-one counselling may improve school attendance among persistently absent pupils, particularly at younger ages. Improving mental health and pupil engagement/enjoyment are potential intervention targets. Our hypotheses require confirmation with controlled designs.

From a child who IS a problem to a child who HAS a problem: fixed period school exclusions and mental health outcomes from routine outcome monitoring among children and young people attending school counselling

BACKGROUND

Exclusion from school is a disciplinary tool with an increasingly recognised relationship to poor mental health among children and young people. We explored the relationship between mental health and school exclusion for a cohort of children and young people receiving one to one counselling.

METHOD

We analysed routinely collected data from a diverse UK sample of children and young people aged between four and 16 years old and receiving school-based counselling (n = 6712 students from 308 primary and 61 secondary schools). Fixed period school exclusion rates (number of sessions) were compared between the academic year before and the academic year in which the child attended counselling. Mental health (Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire) was compared at baseline and at the end of the intervention (after between 16-22 counselling sessions depending on the phase of education).

RESULTS

Despite more complex and severe initial difficulties, and facing greater adversity, children and young people who experienced school exclusion prior to counselling demonstrated a significant reduction in subsequent sessions of school exclusion in the academic year that the counselling took place (from two full school weeks to half a school week). Moreover, over 74% of the students had fewer reported exclusions and more than half (56.14%) did not have any further subsequent exclusions. They also had better mental health measured by the teacher reported SDQ (pre-intervention M = 18.94, SD = 6.83 vs. postintervention M = 15.67, SD = 7.56, t(310) = 8.23, p < .001) or by the parents (pre-intervention M = 18.09, SD = 6.42 vs. postintervention M = 14.0, SD = 6.99, t(171) = 7.71, p < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

School-based mental health interventions may positively influence educational engagement as well as mental health. Providers should, therefore, monitor both to explore the impact of their interventions. The identification of poor mental health may alter staff perceptions and management of challenging pupils, which future studies should explore.

Impact of counselling provision in primary schools on child and adolescent mental health service referral rates: a longitudinal observational cohort study

BACKGROUND

In the United Kingdom, schools play an increasingly important role in supporting young peoples' mental health. While there is a growing evidence base to support the effectiveness of school-based interventions, less is known about how these provisions impact on local Child and Adolescent Mental Health Service (CAMHS) referral rates. There is a concern that an increase in school-based provision might lead to an increase in CAMHS referrals and overwhelm services. We aimed to examine the longitudinal association between Place2Be counselling provision in primary schools on CAMHS referral rates in South London.

METHOD

This was a retrospective cohort study using linked data from the National Pupil Database (NPD) and CAMHS referrals to the South London and Maudsley's NHS Foundation Trust (SLaM) identified through the Clinical Record Interactive Search (CRIS) tool. The cohort included a total of 285 state-maintained primary schools in four London boroughs for the academic years of 2007-2012. During the study period, 23 of these schools received school-based mental health provision from Place2Be. The primary outcome was the incident rate ratio (IRR) of school-level accepted CAMHS referrals in 2012/13 in schools with, or without, Place2Be provision.

RESULTS

There was no significant association between elevated rates of CAMHS referral and Place2Be provision, even after comprehensive adjustment for school-level and pupil characteristics (IRR 0.91 (0.67-1.23)). School-level characteristics, including higher proportion of white-British pupils (IRR 1.009 (1.002-1.02)), medical staff ratio (IRR 6.49 (2.05-20.6)) and poorer Ofsted school inspection ratings (e.g. IRR 1.58 (1.06-2.34) for 'Requires Improvement' vs. 'Outstanding') were associated with increased CAMHS referral rates.

CONCLUSIONS

Place2Be provision did not result in increased specialist mental health referrals; however, other school-level characteristics did. Future research should investigate pupils' Place2Be clinical outcomes, as well the outcomes of individuals referred to CAMHS to better understand which needs are being met by which services.