Evaluation of the Society for Coronary Angiography and Interventions' lesion classification system in 14,133 patients with percutaneous coronary interventions in the current stent era

Predicting angiographic outcome in contemporary percutaneous coronary intervention: a lesion-specific logistic model

BACKGROUND

Previous angiographic lesion classification systems were derived from analysis of outcomes and lesion complexity in the early stent era. Advances in equipment design and techniques have altered the association between lesion and target vessel characteristics and procedural outcome in modern percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). We evaluated the precise relationship between lesion characteristics and technical outcome on a lesion by lesion basis in a large dataset. We developed a multivariate model to predict technical failure in PCI.

METHODS

Analysis of prospectively collected data on 10,800 lesions in 6,719 consecutive PCI cases between January 2000 and December 2004. Multivariate logistic regression was undertaken to identify predictors of angiographic outcome at each treated lesion (success/failure). Statistical model validation was carried out using data from a further 3,340 treated lesions in 1,940 consecutive cases.

RESULTS

Independent variables associated with an increased risk of technical failure included total occlusion, severe calcification, proximal vessel tortuosity >90 degrees, lesion in a degenerate vein graft, and lesion angulation > or =90 degrees. The receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve for the predicted probability of technical failure was 0.85. Failure occurred in 2.2% of treated lesions in the validation set (ROC curve 0.82, model predicted 2.5%).

CONCLUSIONS

We have re-evaluated the association between lesion characteristics and technical outcome in modern PCI. We have thereby developed a contemporary prediction model for angiographic outcome at each treated lesion.

Platelet responses and coagulation activation on polylactide and heparin-polycaprolactone-L-lactide-coated polylactide stent struts

Despite modern stent technology and effective antiplatelet therapy, metallic stents carry the risk of (sub)acute thrombosis. Our aim was to examine short-term differences in platelet deposition and coagulation activation between biodegradable polylactide (PLA), heparin-polycaprolactone-L-lactide-coated polylactide (hepa-P(CL95/L-LA5)-PLA), and stainless steel (SS) stent struts. Gel-filtered platelets (GFP) and platelet-rich plasma (PRP) were labeled with 10 nM (3)H-serotonin. Platelet deposition was measured after incubation of the stent struts in human serum albumin-coated wells at 37 degrees C in either GFP or PRP. Platelet morphology was studied by scanning electron microscopy (SEM). For coagulation activation, the stent struts were incubated in either PRP or platelet-poor plasma (PPP), anticoagulated with D-phenylalanyl-L-prolyl-L-arginine chloromethyl ketone (PPACK), followed by measurement of fibrinogen, thrombin time (TT), prothrombin fragment 1+2 (F1+2), and thrombin-antithrombin complex (TAT). SS showed adherence of larger amounts of GFPs than did PLA at a platelet density of 300 x 10(6)/mL (p < 0.05). Furthermore, representative SEM studies showed more platelet spreading on SS than on PLA stent struts. Between PLA and SS, coagulation activity did not differ at any assessment. Based on prolonged TT values in plasma, the heparin coating strongly inhibited coagulation (p < 0.05). The values of soluble TAT and F1+2 for PLA were similar to those of controls, i.e., to incubated suspensions without a stent strut. In conclusion, when compared with stainless steel, both PLA and hepa-P(CL95/L-LA5)-PLA appear hemocompatible as intravascular stent materials.

SCAI statement on ad hoc versus the separate performance of diagnostic cardiac catheterization and coronary intervention

Coronary intervention may be combined with diagnostic cardiac catheterization or performed separately. In the early years of angioplasty, performing these procedures separately was standard practice. Gradually, ad hoc intervention (performing diagnostic angiography and coronary intervention within the same session) has become more common, largely because of its convenience for patients and efficiency for physicians. However, the safety and potential cost savings of this approach remain uncertain. Criteria for the appropriate use of ad hoc intervention have not been established. Ad hoc intervention is reasonable for many, but not appropriate for all patients and should not be considered standard therapy. This document updates an earlier review of this topic and provides suggestions for the use of ad hoc intervention as a routine strategy.

Evaluation of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association and the Society for Coronary Angiography and Interventions lesion classification system in the current "stent era" of coronary interventions (from the ACC-National Cardiovascular Data Registry)

In 1988 American College of Cardiology (ACC)/American Heart Association (AHA) Guidelines for Coronary Angioplasty proposed a lesion classification system to stratify lesions by difficulty and risk to better understand the outcomes of coronary interventions. It was a 3-level (A, B, and C) classification based on 11 lesion characteristics. A modification, dividing the intermediate B category into B1 and B2, is also in common use. Recently, a simplification of this classification was evaluated using the large Society for Cardiac Angiography and Interventions (SCAI) Registry (SCAI I = non-C/patent; SCAI II = C/patent; SCAI III = non-C/occluded; SCAI IV = C/occluded). The lesion classification systems were evaluated in 61,926 patients from the ACC National Cardiovascular Data Registry who underwent single-vessel percutaneous coronary intervention between January 1998 and September 2000. Stents were placed in 74.5% of patients. Logistic models for lesion success and complications were constructed and compared. The c statistic for success using the ACC/AHA original classification system was 0.69, 0.71 for the modified ACC/AHA system, and 0.75 for the SCAI classification. The range of complication and success rates was greater using the SCAI models, and the logistic models for success and complication were more robust for the SCAI system. Thus, in the large ACC-National Cardiovascular Data Registry, with a high percentage of stent usage, the simpler SCAI lesion classification provided better discrimination for success and complications than the more complex ACC/AHA lesion classification system-original or modified.