Thrombosis of a patent foramen ovale closure device: thrombolytic management

Successful treatment of acute device thrombosis of patent foramen ovale with slow infusion of low-dose thrombolytic therapy

Background

Percutaneous closure of patent foramen ovale (PFO) is used in selected individuals to eliminate the risk of recurrent cerebral embolism due to paradoxical embolization. Although device thrombosis is rare, it can cause serious complications. Herein, we report a 40-year-old woman who developed acute PFO closure device-associated thrombus and was subsequently treated with slow infusion of low-dose tissue plasminogen activator (t-PA) (25 mg/6 h).

Case summary

A 40-year-old woman was admitted to the hospital because of an cerebrovascular accident (CVA). Computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging of the brain demonstrated the presence of an ischaemic lesion in the right cerebellar infarct. Since no pathological finding was detected that could cause CVA, it was considered that there might be paradoxical embolism due to PFO. Percutaneous PFO closure was decided by the heart and brain team. The occluder was implanted under transoesophageal echocardiography (TEE) and fluoroscopy guidance. Although activated clotting time was 250 s, hypermobile acute thrombus measuring 11 × 5 mm was seen on the left atrial side of the PFO device. Slow infusion of low-dose t-PA treatment was given. As soon as after a single-dose t-PA, control TEE was performed and it was seen that almost the entire thrombus was lysed. The patient did not have any complications during the treatment period.

Discussion

Acute PFO device thrombosis is a rare but important complication. If there is no contraindication for lytic treatment in acutely developing large PFO device thrombosis, slow infusion of low-dose t-PA may be useful.

Case report: Early thrombosis in left atrial during transcatheter closure of ASD in a child with favorable outcome after use of GPIIb/IIIa receptor antagonist and heparin

Background

Acute thrombus in atrial septal defect occluders is a rare complication that requires aggressive, effective, and safe management. Tirofiban, a platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor antagonist, is widely used for the management of thromboembolic diseases, such as coronary heart disease and stroke. To date, there is no report using the GPIIb/IIIa receptor antagonist tirofiban for the management of ASD closure-related thrombosis in children.

Case presentation

Herein, we reported a case of a 5-year-old girl with ASD who presented with acute thrombus on the left disc of the occluder device immediately after transcatheter closure of ASD. The thrombus was successfully dissolved 24 h after a combined infusion of heparin and tirofiban, followed by 1 months of aspirin and clopidogrel and 5 months of aspirin alone. No thromboembolism or hemorrhage events occurred during follow-up for more than 2 years.

Conclusion

The continuous infusion of GPIIb/IIIa receptor antagonist tirofiban combined with heparin may have beneficial effects for the management of thrombosis during ASD closure procedure.

Antithrombotic/Antiplatelet Treatment in Transcatheter Structural Cardiac Interventions-PFO/ASD/LAA Occluder and Interatrial Shunt Devices

Transcatheter interventions enable safe and efficient treatment of various structural heart diseases. However, therapy does not finished with the end of the procedure. Device thrombosis is a possible serious complication. Therefore, careful patient management should include optimal antiplatelet or antithrombotic medication to enhance safe and complete endothelial coverage of the implanted device. In case of thrombus formation careful diagnostic evaluation and prompt treatment is crucial. This paper provides an update to current knowledge and understanding of prevention and management of device related thrombosis.

Transcatheter interatrial septal defect closure in a large cohort: midterm follow-up results

OBJECTIVES

We evaluated immediate and midterm results of transcatheter closure of atrial septal defects (ASDs) and patent foramen ovale (PFO) using various closure devices.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study included four hundred fourteen patients (one hundred eighty-two men, two hundred thirty-two women; mean age 39 ± 12.3 years; range 17-67 years) who underwent transcatheter closure of secundum ASD (n = 193) or PFO (n = 221). All the patients were evaluated by transthoracic echocardiography and transesophageal echocardiography before the procedure. Transcatheter closure was performed by using Amplatzer (n = 184), Occlutech Figulla (n = 209), or BioSTAR (n = 21) devices. Closure of ASDs was performed under general anesthesia with transesophageal echocardiography guidance, and closure of PFOs was performed under local anesthesia with transthoracic echocardiography guidance. Follow-up controls were at 1, 6, and 12 months and annually thereafter. The median follow-up periods of ASD and PFO patients were 43 and 30 months.

RESULTS

The mean device size was 19.3 ± 6.2 mm for ASD patients and 24.6 ± 2.6 mm for PFO patients. The mean procedural and fluoroscopy times were 22.3 ± 4.7 and 4.1 ± 1.9 minutes for ASD closure and 12.4 ± 3.2 and 3.1 ± 1.2 minutes for PFO closure, respectively. Procedural device embolization occurred in only two patients (0.48%). During follow-up, recurrent embolic events occurred in four patients (1.8%) after PFO closure, and no residual shunts were seen after ASD closure. Device thrombosis developed in two ASD patients during the procedure and in one PFO patient at 12th month of the follow-up (0.72%).

CONCLUSION

Transcatheter closure of PFOs and secundum-type ASDs using the Amplatzer, Occlutech Figulla, and BioSTAR devices is an efficacious and safe therapeutic option.

Influence of PFO Anatomy on Successful Transcatheter Closure

Patent foramen ovale (PFO) is considered a risk factor for serious clinical syndromes, the most important of which is cryptogenic stroke in the setting of paradoxic embolism. The safety and feasibility of transcatheter PFO closure have been addressed in several studies; this procedure is performed worldwide with excellent results. Variations in the atrial septal configuration and PFO are frequent and have an impact on the technical aspects and success in transcatheter PFO closure. To minimize the rate of complications of percutaneous closure of PFO, patients must be carefully selected on the basis of morphology and location of the interatrial defect.

Thrombus formation after left atrial appendage exclusion using an Amplatzer cardiac plug device

The feasibility and safety of left atrial appendage closure with the Amplatzer cardiac plug (AGA Medical Corp., Minneapolis, MN) have been recently published; no thrombus formation on the device surface has been reported previously. We describe a case of a 66-year-old man with permanent atrial fibrillation, previous stroke, and contraindication for long-term oral anticoagulant therapy. A 22-mm ACP device was deployed successfully without complications. The patient was discharged on acetyl salicylic acid 100 mg and clopidogrel 75 mg daily. After 4 weeks, the patient was admitted for a lower gastrointestinal bleeding and clopidogrel was stopped. A 3-month follow-up echocardiogram confirmed the exclusion of the LAA but it demonstrated the presence of a thrombus on the atrial surface of the device. It was decided to keep the patient on acetyl salicylic acid 100 mg with the addition of enoxaparin 60 mg bid. Transesophageal echocardiogram demonstrated total resolution of the thrombus after 2 months.

Pulmonary embolism: a late complication of a correctly positioned occluder device for patent foramen ovale

We describe a patient with pulmonary embolism originating from right atrial thrombosis that developed at least 18 months after patent foramen ovale (PFO) device implantation. On surgical inspection, the PFO device was found to be correctly positioned, stable and well endothelialized. We then hypothesize that current smoker status, double antiplatelet regimen discontinuation and mild hyperhomocysteinaemia may have had a role in determining this severe, unexpected and late complication in this patient.

Thrombosis after septal closure device placement: a review of the current literature

Thrombus formation has been described for all types of commercially available transcatheter septal occlusion devices. Most reports have been single-institution case studies. Screening for hypercoagulable conditions prior to device placement and anticoagulation after device deployment has been variable. The objective of this study was to synthesize the current experience with device thrombosis; the Medline database from 1980 until 2004 was searched. Seventeen articles identified 54 unique patients with device thrombosis. Thrombus developed on eight different types of transcatheter devices. All commercially available devices had at least one reported case of thrombosis. Patient mean age was 44.2 +/- 9.8 years. Thrombosis was diagnosed at a mean of 5 months after device deployment. Prior to device placement, 12 patients had normal coagulation evaluations and 5 had coagulopathies. For 37 patients, no mention was made in the report of coagulation studies. Prior to device thrombosis, 26 patients received aspirin and clopidogrel, 15 patients received aspirin alone, 8 received warfarin, 2 heparin alone, 1 aspirin and warfarin. One patient with hemophilia A received no anticoagulation and in one case treatment prior to thrombosis was not reported. After device thrombosis, 35 patients were treated with warfarin with thrombus resolution, 2 had successful lytic therapy, 1 was treated with heparin alone. Sixteen patients had surgical explantation of the device. Septal occlusion device thrombosis is rare. All types of commercially available devices have been associated with thrombosis. All patients should have early (< or = 3 months) echocardiographic surveillance for device thrombosis. Thorough coagulation evaluation is imperative prior to transcatheter device placement.

Surgical Closure of Combined Symptomatic Patent Foramen Ovale and Atrial Septum Aneurysm for Prevention of Recurrent Cerebral Emboli

BACKGROUND

Patients with patent foramen ovale (PFO) have an undefined but certainly considerable risk of repeated cerebral ischemia due to paradoxical embolism. Especially, if a cerebrovascular event has already occurred and the combination with an atrial septum aneurysm (ASA) is present this risk increases tremendously. The aim of this study was to demonstrate that surgical closure of PFO in combination with an ASA is safe and useful in preventing recurrent strokes.

METHODS

Ten patients with previous cerebral ischemia, proven by CT or MRI, and PFO in combination with an ASA were prospectively scheduled for surgical closure. Patients with extracardiac sources of embolic disease were excluded from this study. However, one patient suffered from a hypercoagulability syndrome.

RESULTS

All patients (mean age 35.5 +/- 19.1 years) underwent direct suture of the PFO and plication of the ASA with the aid of cardiopulmonary bypass and cardioplegic arrest (n = 3) or ventricular fibrillation (n = 7). Mean operation time was 123.1 +/- 20.2 minutes; mean bypass time was 34.5 +/- 9.9 minutes. There was no mortality or significant postoperative morbidity. Mean hospital stay was 5.1 +/- 1.5 days. During a follow-up of >4 years, no recurrent stroke or transient ischemic attack occurred and no patient received anticoagulation therapy.

CONCLUSION

Our data suggest that surgical closure of PFO in combination with ASA in patients with previous stroke is safe and efficacious to prevent recurrent strokes and avoids lifelong anticoagulation.

Hematologic ramifications of patent foramen ovale--role of hypercoagulable state

This article discusses the ramifications of a hypercoagulable state in patients with a patent foramen ovale.

Approaches to correct device malposition in percutaneous PFO closure: Anatomical and technical implications

We describe three patients with initial failure of transcatheter patent foramen ovale closure. Two patients had residual defects successfully closed during the initial session, and one patient had a persistent shunt, which was corrected at a later time. Anatomical and technical considerations and the role of intracardiac ultrasound are discussed.

Successful treatment of left atrial disk thrombus on an Amplatzer atrial septal defect occluder with abciximab and heparin

Acute device thrombosis is a rare but important complication after transcatheter atrial septal defect closure. In this case a mobile thrombus was noted on the left side of an Amplatzer atrial septal occluder after device release in a 12 year old boy with an uncomplicated atrial septal defect. The thrombus was successfully treated with an infusion of heparin and the glycoprotein IIa/IIIb receptor antagonist abciximab. Transoesophageal ultrasound performed the following day showed complete resolution of the clot. There are no reports to guide treatment of acute thrombosis in this setting. This combination of treatments was effective without complication in this case.

Large left atrial thrombus formation despite warfarin therapy after device closure of a patent foramen ovale

Appropriate anticoagulation after transcatheter device placement is controversial. Patients with no history of thromboembolism or neurologic event typically receive antiplatelet therapy for several months while the device endothelializes. For patients with a history of stroke, there are no established guidelines for postdevice anticoagulation. Most patients receive warfarin, antiplatelet therapy, or a combination. Thrombus formation after transcatheter device placement has been reported for most commercially available devices. We describe a patient who developed a left atrial thrombus after closure of a patent foramen ovale with a CardioSEAL device. The patient had a normal hypercoaguable laboratory evaluation prior to device placement. Thrombosis occurred despite warfarin therapy before and after device placement. The patient's international normalized ratio was checked every 2 weeks after device placement and ranged between 2.0 and 2.8. She had no clinical arrhythmia during this time period. The left atrial thrombus was detected on routine follow-up transthoracic echocardiogram performed 6 months after device deployment. A subsequent transesophageal echocardiogram demonstrated no residual shunt, appropriate positioning of the device, flat against the septum, and a 1 x 2 cm thrombus attached to the superior and posterior left atrial arm near the junction with the native septum. A fluoroscopic image demonstrated no arm fractures. The device and thrombus were subsequently removed at surgery without complication. This case is perplexing in that the patient received appropriate anticoagulation had a negative hypercoaguable work-up, no residual shunt, and a well-positioned device.

Antiphospholipid antibodies are common in patients referred for percutaneous patent foramen ovale closure

Very little is known about any interaction between patent foramen ovale (PFO) and various hypercoagulable disorders that have been associated with cryptogenic stroke. Percutaneous PFO closure for secondary prevention of paradoxical thromboembolization is receiving increasing attention. Hypercoagulability may affect the potential risks and expected benefits of percutaneous PFO closure. Consecutive patients undergoing percutaneous PFO closure at a single center were screened for the presence of antiphospholipid antibodies, elevated lipoprotein(a), hyperhomocysteinemia, and dysfibrinogenemia. Sixteen of 34 patients (47%) with complete arterial hypercoagulability screening had laboratory evidence of arterial hypercoagulability. Thirteen of these patients (38%) had antiphospholipid antibodies. Antiphospholipid antibodies appear to be common in patients referred for percutaneous PFO closure for secondary prevention of systemic thromboembolic events. Thorough testing based on established recommendations is warranted. Further studies are needed regarding the interaction between PFO and various hypercoagulable disorders that have been associated with cryptogenic stroke.