Transcatheter closure of double atrial septal defects with a single Amplatzer device

Can Artificial Intelligence Revolutionize the Diagnosis and Management of the Atrial Septal Defect in Children?

Atrial septal defects (ASDs) present a significant healthcare challenge, demanding accurate and timely diagnosis and precise management to ensure optimal patient outcomes. Artificial intelligence (AI) applications in healthcare are rapidly evolving, offering promise for enhanced medical decision-making and patient care. In the context of cardiology, the integration of AI promises to provide more efficient and accurate diagnosis and personalized treatment strategies for ASD patients. In interventional cardiology, sometimes the lack of precise measurement of the cardiac rims evaluated by transthoracic echocardiography combined with the floppy aspect of the rims can mislead and result in complications. AI software can be created to generate responses for difficult tasks, like which device is the most suitable for different shapes and dimensions to prevent embolization or erosion. This paper reviews the current state of AI in healthcare and its applications in cardiology, emphasizing the specific opportunities and challenges in applying AI to ASD diagnosis and management. By exploring the capabilities and limitations of AI in ASD diagnosis and management. This paper highlights the evolution of medical practice towards a more AI-augmented future, demonstrating the capacity of AI to unlock new possibilities for healthcare professionals and patients alike.

Balloon Interrogation of Intervening Tissue: A Novel Method to Decide Strategy for Closing Multiple Atrial Septal Defects

BACKGROUND

Two separate ostium secundum atrial septal defects are a challenging substrate for device closure due to lack of a well-described strategy or an adequately evaluated protocol.

METHODS

This is a prospective study comprising 20 patients with 2 atrial septal defects who underwent device closure. All of them underwent balloon interrogation (BI) of the intervening tissue to decide 1- versus 2-device strategy. During BI, if the flow through both the defects could be stopped completely implying adequate mobility of the separating tissue, a single device strategy was used. The size of the device in this subset was determined by BI diameter. In case the flow persisted, 2 devices were used to close the defects separately.

RESULTS

The mean age was 24±17 years. The main defect size was (mean 14.5 mm±SD 2.69 mm), whereas the second defect measured (mean 8.5±SD 3.02 mm). The tissue separating the 2 defects was measured (mean 6.1±SD 2.6 mm). In 15 of them, based on the BI results, a single device was used successfully to close both the defects without a residual shunt. In the remaining 5 patients, 2 devices were used. There were no complications during the procedure or at follow-up period of 41.9±16.9 months.

CONCLUSIONS

BI in patients with 2 atrial septal defects is helpful in defining 1- versus 2-device strategies and in choosing the size of the device to be used. Nearly 3/4 of the patients may get away with a single device for closing both the defects successfully thereby decreasing the cost and complexity of the procedure.

Role of Echocardiography in the Diagnosis and Interventional Management of Atrial Septal Defects

This review centers on the usefulness of echo-Doppler studies in the diagnosis of ostium secundum atrial septal defects (ASDs) and in their management, both in children and adults. Transthoracic echocardiography can easily identify the secundum ASDs and also differentiate secundum ASDs from other kinds of ASDs, such as ostium primum ASD, sinus venosus ASD and coronary sinus ASD, as well as patent foramen ovale. Preliminary selection of patients for device occlusion can be made by transthoracic echocardiograms while final selection is based on transesophageal (TEE) or intracardiac (ICE) echocardiographic studies with optional balloon sizing of ASDs. TEE and ICE are extremely valuable in guiding device implantation and in evaluating the position of the device following its implantation. Echo-Doppler evaluation during follow-up is also useful in documenting improvements in ventricular size and function, in assessing the device position, in detecting residual shunts, and in identifying rare device-related complications. Examples of echo images under each section are presented. The reasons why echo-Doppler is very valuable in diagnosing and managing ASDs are extensively discussed.

Intracardiac Echocardiogram: Feasibility, Efficacy, and Safety for Guidance of Transcatheter Multiple Atrial Septal Defects Closure

We aimed to determine the feasibility, efficacy, success, and safety of intracardiac echocardiography (ICE) in transcatheter multiple atrial septal defect (ASD) closure. Of 185 patients with multiple ASDs who underwent transcatheter closure, 140 (76%) patients who weighed <30kg with a narrow distance between defects or in whom single device closure was anticipated were guided by ICE and 45 patients were guided by three-dimensional (3D) transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) with or without ICE. Patients in the ICE group were relatively younger and weighed less than those in the 3D TEE group (p < 0.0001). The ratio of the distance between defects >7 mm was high, and more cases required ≥2 devices in the 3D TEE group than those in the ICE group (p < 0.0001). All patients in the 3D TEE group and seven patients (5%) in the ICE group were operated on under general anesthesia (p < 0.0001). The fluoroscopic time was shorter in the ICE group (13.98 ± 6.24 min vs. 24.86 ± 16.47 min, p = 0.0005). No difference in the complete closure rate and complications was observed. ICE-guided transcatheter and 3D TEE were feasible, safe, and effective in successful multiple ASD device closures, especially for young children and patients at high risk under general anesthesia.

Transcatheter closure of fenestrated atrial septal aneurysm in children: Feasibility and long-term results

BACKGROUND

To date, extensive experience in transcatheter closure of fenestrated atrial septal aneurysm (ASA) in the pediatric population is limited.

METHODS

To report on procedural feasibility, efficacy, and long-term outcome, we enrolled all children submitted to an attempt of transcatheter closure of fenestrated ASA at two, large volume, pediatric cardiology units (Naples and Massa, Italy) between April 2000 to May 2020.

RESULTS

This retrospective study included 139 patients (median age 9 years [range 2-18] and weight 36 kg [range 10-102]); 19 (13.7%) children were ≤20 kg (range 10-20) and 14 (10.1%) were ≤5 years old. Single perforation was observed in 28 patients (20.1%), while 111 patients (79.9%) had multifenestrated ASA. The median size of the main defect was 15 mm (range 6-34) and 25 patients (18%) had a defect ≥20 mm. The procedural success rate was 99% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 94.9-99.8) using a single device in 75 (69%), two devices in 31 (28%), and three devices in 3 (3%) cases. Early minor adverse events (AEs) occurred in four patients (2.8%). Late minor AEs were recorded in one patient (0.7%) over a median follow-up of 5 years ([range 0-18 years; total 890.2 person-years, and with 30 patients (22%) followed ≥10 years). Neither mortality nor major AEs were recorded. Freedom from AEs was 99.1% at 10-15 years (95% CI: 93.5-99.8%), without any difference according to atrial septum anatomy or patient age and weight.

CONCLUSION

Transcatheter closure of fenestrated ASA is technically feasible and effective in children with excellent long-term outcomes.

Transcatheter closure of multiple secundum atrial septal defects using multiple occluder devices: A comparative experience between pediatric and adult patients

Background:

Device closure of multiple atrial septal defects (MASDs) is frequently done using a single centrally deployed septal or cribriform occluder, but multiple devices are needed for large defects separated more than 6 mm. There is a concern about complications while using multiple devices, especially in children.

Methods:

Patients who received multiple devices for closure of MASD were grouped according to their age and analyzed for procedural techniques, immediate and late complications. MASDs closed by a single device were not included. Balloon sizing was done when echocardiographic images were suboptimal before simultaneous device deployment through two venous accesses or sequential deployment through one access. Duration and number of antiplatelet drugs and residual flows were analyzed on follow-up.

Results:

Twenty-five patients received multiple devices. Balloon interrogation was performed in 16/18 adults but only in 2/7 children. Device size was 2–5 mm larger than echocardiographic defect size or equal to balloon waist. There were no procedural failures; 7/25 showed small postprocedural residual flows. Complications including embolization in one, arrhythmia in one, and cobra deformity in two were managed successfully. On a median follow-up of 5.5 years (1–12 years), residual flows disappeared in 4/7 and there were no major late complications.

Conclusions:

Use of multiple devices for closing MASD is feasible with good technical success. Echocardiography and balloon interrogation are the keys for success. Simultaneous deployment is often needed and sequential delivery is feasible rarely if the defects are far apart. Minor residual leaks are common but improve on follow-up. There are no significant new complications on long-term follow-up.

Transcatheter closure of fenestrated atrial septal aneurysm: feasibility and long-term results

AIM

To report on the feasibility, efficacy and long-term outcome of transcatheter closure of fenestrated Atrial Septal Aneurysm (ASA).

METHODS

Between April 2000 and May 2020, 568 patients with fenestrated ASA underwent transcatheter closure at two large-volume Pediatric Cardiology and GUCH Units (Naples and Massa, Italy). Procedural indications were cardiac volume overload in 223 patients (39%) or prophylaxis of paradoxical embolization in 345 patients (61%). Patients' median age and weight were 42 years (range 19-52) and 66 kg (range 54-79), respectively. One-hundred and thirty-nine patients (25%) were younger than 18 years.

RESULTS

Single fenestration was found in 311 patients (55%) (Group 1), whereas 257 patients (45%) had multifenestrated ASA (Group 2). The procedure was successful in all but seven patients (1.2%). In Group 1, closure was achieved with a single device. In Group 2, one device was used in 168 patients (67%), two devices in 74 patients (28%), three devices in 12 patients (5%), and four devices in 1 patient (0.3%). The early complication rate was 3%, without any difference according to anatomy or patient's age. At discharge, complete shunt closure was higher in Group 1 (92% vs. 72%, P < 0.0001), without any difference between groups at the last follow-up evaluation (100% vs. 99%, P = 0.12). Procedural safety was persistent during the long-term follow-up (mean 7.2 ± 5.4, range 0-19 years): freedom from adverse events was 97% at 10-15 years. Seventeen patients (3%) were submitted to reintervention, mostly as prophylaxis of paradoxical embolization.

CONCLUSION

Transcatheter closure of perforated ASA is technically feasible in a high percentage of cases, with excellent long-term outcomes.

Use of cribriform amplatzer septal occluder in the pediatric population: Feasibility, safety, and technical considerations

Purpose :

Fenestrated atrial septal defects (F-ASDs) in the pediatric population pose a challenge for transcatheter device closure since multiple devices are not preferred in small hearts. Oversizing the Amplatzer Septal Occluder (ASO) to cover the surrounding fenestrations usually distorts the central waist as well as the disc profile and often defeats the purpose. This is a retrospective observational study with an aim to assess the feasibility and safety of cribriform ASO in closing F-ASDs in small children.

Methods:

Sixteen children with F-ASD who underwent device closure with cribriform ASO were included in the study. The fenestrated septal length (FSL) and the total septal length (TSL) were measured on transesophageal echocardiogram. A device size which was 1.5–2 times the FSL but smaller than the TSL was selected. The defect was closed with a device passed through a relatively centrally placed smaller fenestration.

Results:

The median age of the cohort was 5 years (2.5–10.5). Majority (14/16) required 25 or 30 mm cribriform ASO. Aneurysmal interatrial septum was seen in most of our patients (11/15). All the patients had successful device implantation. Complete closure of the defect was seen in 11 patients while 5 patients had insignificant residual shunt at a median follow-up of 40 months (1–60 months). There were no other complications.

Conclusions:

Cribriform ASO can be used safely and effectively in closing F-ASDs in children. Deployment of the device through a small central hole allows covering maximum fenestrations and gives more stability to the device. Residual shunts, although not infrequent, are insignificant.

Individualized Experience With Percutaneous Transcatheter Closure of Multiple Atrial Septal Defects: A Single-Center Study

Multiple atrial septal defects (ASDs) are one type of secundum ASD, most of which have an atrial septal aneurysm or long interdefect distance. In our retrospective single-center study, we reviewed different closure strategies for multiple ASDs. We analyzed 50 patients who underwent percutaneous transcatheter closure from May 2011 to July 2019. Information on the patients' characteristics, operation procedure, occluder selection, and complications was collected. According to the feature of the defects and device choice, multiple ASDs were divided into five groups. A successful operation was achieved in every patient. A total of 50 patients were implanted with 58 devices, with 26 patients implanted with a single standard ASD occluder (ASDO); six patients were implanted with double standard ASDOs, and only one patient was implanted with three standard ASDOs. There were 17 patients whose closure was made using the small-waist–big-edge ASDO. Seventy-six percent of the patients (38/50) had an immediate residual shunt. During the mean follow-up of 25.76 ± 22.53 months, the complete closure rate was 92%. Except for two patients with a transient atrioventricular block, individualized experience with percutaneous transcatheter closure for multiple ASDs was effective in a single-center study. After a mid- to long-term follow-up, the multiple ASDOs and small-waist–big-edge ASDO had no serious adverse events or complications.

Personalized Three-Dimensional Printing and Echoguided Procedure Facilitate Single Device Closure for Multiple Atrial Septal Defects

Background

To evaluate the feasibility of using a single device to close multiple atrial septal defects (ASDs) under the guidance of transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) and with the aid of three-dimensional (3D) printing models.

Methods

Sixty-two patients with multiple ASDs were retrospectively analyzed. Thirty of these patients underwent TTE-guided closure (3D printing and TTE group) after a simulation of occlusion in 3D printing models. The remaining 32 patients underwent ASD closure under fluoroscopic guidance (conventional group). Closure status was assessed immediately and at 6 months after device closure.

Results

Successful transcatheter closure with a single device was achieved in 26 patients in the 3D printing and TTE group and 27 patients in the conventional group. Gender, age [18.8 ± 15.9 (3–51) years in the 3D printing and TTE group; 14.0 ± 11.6 (3–50) years in the conventional group], mean maximum distance between defects, prevalence of 3 atrial defects and large defect distance (defined as distance ≥7 mm), and occluder size used were similarly distributed between groups. However, the 3D printing and TTE group had lower frequency of occluder replacement (3.8% vs 59.3%, p < 0.0001), prevalence of mild residual shunts (defined as <5 mm) immediately (19.2% vs 44.4%, p < 0.05) and at 6 months (7.7% vs 29.6%, p < 0.05) after the procedure, and cost (32960.8 ± 2018.7 CNY vs 41019.9 ± 13758.2 CNY, p < 0.01).

Conclusion

The combination of the 3D printing technology and ultrasound-guided interventional procedure provides a reliable new therapeutic approach for multiple ASDs, especially for challenging cases with large defect distance.

Transcatheter closure of atrial septal defect: principles and available devices

There has been a remarkable improvement in the treatment strategy of secundum atrial septal defect (ASD) over the last few decades. Indebted to the improvement in device technology and procedural techniques, transcatheter closure of ASD is currently accepted as the treatment of choice in most patients with secundum ASD. Recent generation devices enable easy and safe deployment of device with the properties of adequate flexibility, re-capturability and repositioning. Use of biocompatible materials with improved device design and refined equipment finish may promote re-endothelialization and reduce potential damage to nearby structures. Most of currently available devices show excellent efficacy and comparable outcome with its own advantages and disadvantages. In addition to improvement of device properties and performance, there has been distinct improvement in procedural technique from numerous experiences of device closure of ASD. Nowadays there are well established principles regarding patient selection, pre-procedural evaluation, step-by-step details of procedure as well as post-procedural follow-up. However, an operator may encounter pitfalls in closing complex lesions such as large defect, rim deficiencies and multiple defects, so every operator has to be familiar with each available device, general principle as well as special issues for complex lesions.

Simultaneous Transcatheter Closure of Multiple Atrial Septal Defects Using Dual Amplatzer Septal Occluder Devices

BACKGROUND

Transcatheter closure has been a recognised treatment strategy for multiple atrial septal defects (mASDs). This study aimed to examine the feasibility, effectiveness, and safety of transcatheter closure of mASDs using dual Amplatzer septal occluder (ASO) devices.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 34 patients who underwent transcatheter closure of mASDs using dual ASO devices from April 2005 to December 2014.

RESULTS

Eight men and 26 women who successfully underwent transcatheter closure of mASDs were included. Ten (29.4%) patients had 3 defects or more. The mean diameters of the larger and smaller defects were 14.0±3.9 mm (8-20 mm) and 9.1±2.6 mm (4-15 mm), respectively. The mean diameters of the larger and smaller devices were 22.2±4.8 mm (13-30 mm) and 17.3±4.1 mm (10-26 mm), respectively. Devices were deployed by the "sandwiches" technique or an interleaved pattern. Immediately after the procedure, 23 (67.6%) patients had complete closure and 11 patients had a residual shunt (6 trivial, 3 small, 1 moderate, 1 large). During the 6 months of follow-up, 30 (88.2%) patients had complete closure of the shunt and 4 patients had a residual shunt (1 large, 3 small). Complications included 2 cases of pericardial effusion, which disappeared at 3 months.

CONCLUSIONS

Simultaneous device implantation in transcatheter closure of mASDs is feasible and effective. The incidence rate of residual shunts is slightly high in the short term, but tends to decrease during mid-term follow-up.

Transcatheter closure of atrial septal defects

Transcatheter closure of atrial septal defects has evolved significantly over the last 20 years. Transcatheter closure has replaced surgical closure for the treatment of most secundum atrial septal defectsat the current time. A major reason for this is the lower morbidity of transcatheter closure procedures. Several closure devices have come into clinical use. The Amplatzer septal occluder (AGA Medical Co.) currently has the largest reported experience and subsequently the best-established safety and efficacy features. Clinically challenging situations, such as larger atrial septal defects, atrial septal defects with deficient rims and multiple atrial septal defects, are increasingly being addressed using the transcatheter approach, with improved results. The incidence of most complications has significantly reduced over time, and serious side effects are relatively uncommon. In this review, the literature is summarized regarding the current role of transcatheter closure, the evolution of the different available devices for clinical use and the complications that occur with their use. A comparison is also made with surgical closure techniques.

Fenestrated atrial septal defect percutaneously occluded by a single device: procedural and financial considerations

A 45-year-old patient presented with a cerebrovascular attack and was subsequently found to have a multi-fenestrated atrial septal defect. Various therapeutic options for percutaneous transcatheter closure with their respective benefits and flaws are discussed, as well as procedural and financial considerations. The decision making process leading to a successful result using a single occlusive device is presented, alongside a review of the literature.

Clinical advantage of real-time three-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography for transcatheter closure of multiple atrial septal defects

This study sought to evaluate the usefulness of real-time three-dimensional (3D) transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) to guide the repair of multiple atrial septal defects (ASDs). Of 212 consecutive patients with secundum ASD who were scheduled for transcatheter closure of their ASDs, 27 had multiple ASDs. These patients underwent two-dimensional (2D) transthoracic echocardiography, 2D TEE, and 3D TEE. Overall, 18 patients had two defects, and 9 patients had three or more defects. The latter group included three patients with multi-fenestrated defects. Optimal 3D images were obtained in 93 % of the patients. In patients with two defects, information on the positional relation of the defects was obtained using 2D TEE and 3D TEE in 71 and 94 % of patients, respectively (P = 0.22). The positional relations of the defects could not be evaluated with 2D TEE in patients with three or more defects, whereas it could be evaluated with 3D TEE in all of these patients (0 vs. 100 %, P = 0.008). In all patients, 3D TEE proved superior to 2D TEE for providing sufficient information (96 vs. 48 %, P = 0.002). Procedural success was obtained in 26 patients (96.3 %), without complications. Transcatheter closure of multiple ASDs under 3D TEE guidance is effective and safe. Real-time 3D TEE can provide useful information regarding complex ASD morphology. It can thus contribute to developing a successful treatment strategy, especially in patients with three or more defects.

Transcatheter closure of multiple interatrial communications

OBJECTIVES

We sought to examine acute and midterm results of closure of multiple interatrial communications with staged device deployment and to review the relevant literature.

BACKGROUND

Information about percutaneous methods of closure for multiple defects is limited.

METHODS

We treated 148 patients with multiple defects. Of these, 88 had a relevant left to right shunt ("LRS"), 52 had a presumed paradoxical embolism ("PPE"), five had both (LRS and PPE), and one patient, respectively, had migraine, decompression sickness, and a right to left shunt. After implantation of the first device, closure of additional septal defects was attempted only if indicated clinically.

RESULTS

Ninety-four patients received a single device and 53 more than one. In four patients, surgical defect closure followed. At the end of follow-up (FU; mean 4.5 ± 3.4 years), complete closure of all defects occurred in 67.6% (62.1% for LRS, 76.5% for PPE). Clinical success (small or trivial residual shunt) was achieved in 86.9% (83.9% for LRS, 90.2% for PPE). Complications included pericardial effusions in 2.7%, recurrent thromboembolic events in 4.8%, and new onset of atrial fibrillation in 10.1%. In a significant number of patients with multiple defects, after single device implantation, the likelihood of complete closure increased with FU time (26% complete closure at 1 month vs. 78% at 24 months).

CONCLUSION

Percutaneous closure of multiple interatrial communications is feasible and safe. Importantly, many residual defects close without further intervention at FU. Therefore, staged device delivery is an alternative to simultaneous device implantation, possibly requiring fewer and smaller second devices.

Percutaneous closure of multiple defects of the atrial septum: procedural results and long-term follow-up

BACKGROUND

The percutaneous closure of single atrial septal defect (ASD) is a valid alternative to surgery.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the feasibility of percutaneous treatment of multiple ASDs.

METHODS

Between 1998 and 2007, 165 out of 1280 consecutive patients undergoing ASD percutaneous closure at our institution showed multiple defects that were classified in four categories: double atrial septal defects (d-ASD), multifenestrated atrial septal defects (f-ASD), multifenestrated defects with no signs of right heart overload (f-PFO), and complex cases (c-ASD). The following end points were taken into consideration: (1) immediate procedural success; (2) long term safety and efficacy. In this study, up to 81% of multiple ASDs were suitable for percutaneous closure.

RESULTS

Multiple device implantations were required in 47% of cases, especially in patients with d-ASD and c-ASD. Complication rate, residual shunt, and long term outcome were comparable among the four different categories. In particular, at long term follow-up (6 +/- 2 years) no patient required further surgical or percutaneous treatment and complete closure was confirmed in 99% of cases.

CONCLUSIONS

Percutaneous closure of multiple ASDs is feasible and associated with a good outcome. A thorough identification and analysis of morphological aspects are mandatory in order to select the appropriate device and the optimal strategy.

Comparison of Clinical Outcomes and Cost Between Surgical and Transcatheter Device Closure of Atrial Septal Defects in Singapore Children

Introduction: With advances in interventional catheterisation, transcatheter device closure of atrial septal defect (ASD) is now a feasible option to open heart surgery, especially in patients with isolated ASD. We aim to compare the outcomes, benefits and costs between device closure versus standard open-heart surgery for ASD in Singapore. Materials and Methods: This is a comparative study between 2 cohorts with isolated secundum ASDs who underwent closure of ASD either by surgery or device, at the Department of Paediatrics, National University Hospital (NUH). The clinical outcomes, complications, length of stay and total costs incurred were compared. Results: Surgical patients were at slightly greater risk of developing complications (RR=1.33; 95% CI, 0.30 to 5.95) than the device group. The median length of inpatient stay for the surgical group was significantly longer than that for the device group. Seventy percent of the patients in the device group did not need to be in ICU while 40% of patients in the surgery group stayed 2 or at least 3 days in ICU (P <0.001). The mean cost per successful procedure was $1511 (95% CI, -352 to 3375) higher for the device group patients despite a shorter length of stay in hospital. Conclusions: We concluded that transcatheter device closure is an effective and safe alternative to surgery in the treatment of suitable ASDs. Despite the high cost of the device, direct and indirect benefits for the patients and their families, who undergo device occlusion include less morbidity, better cosmesis, shorter length of stay in hospital, faster recovery and shorter time taken to resume normal activities. Key words: Amplatzer, ASD, Cost, Device occlusion, Interventional cardiology

Transcatheter closure of atrial septal defects with multiple devices in adults: procedural and clinical outcomes

OBJECTIVE

This study reports the procedural, short and medium term outcomes in patients receiving multiple implants for device closure of secundum atrial septal defects (ASD).

DESIGN AND SETTING

From the database of the Toronto Congenital Cardiac Centre, 36 consecutive patients (mean age 46+/-15 years; 23 females) received >1 implant for closure of an interatrial communication. Short term (mean 97+/-77 days) and medium term (mean 2.5+/-1.4 years) follow-up data were analyzed. Procedures were performed under intracardiac echo (ICE) and fluoroscopic guidance.

RESULTS

The Amplatzer Septal Occluder (ASO) was implanted in all except one. Thirty-one patients had 2, and 4 patients, 3 ASO devices. There were no major adverse events at implantation or on follow-up. Patients with >NYHA class I symptoms fell from 44% to 6% (p<0.05) at 3 months. Right ventricular (RV) systolic pressure fell from 39+/-7 to 32+/-4 mm Hg in the short term (p<0.05), and to 30+/-4 mm Hg in the medium term (p<0.05, compared to baseline) and RV diameters fell from 48+/-5 to 40+/-5 (p<0.05) in the short term and to 38+/-8 mm (p=ns) in the medium term. Small residual leaks were present in 22% at 3 months and 12% (p<0.05) at 1 year.

CONCLUSION

Multiple ASD device implants can be safely employed with excellent outcomes. Significant reductions in RV pressure and diameter occur in the short term with a continued trend to benefit.

Cribriform amplatzer device closure of fenestrated atrial septal defects: feasibility and technical aspects

Fenestrated atrial septal defects (F-ASDs) may pose a challenge to device closure; recently, a cribriform device with a minimal connecting intrawaist diameter and large, equal left- and right-sided discs has been designed to cover more than one adjacent defect. This study demonstrates the feasibility and technical aspects of closing F-ASDs using this new device. Sixteen patients between August 2003 and January 2006 were included in this study. The inclusion criterion was the presence of a F-ASD diagnosed by transesophageal echocardiography. One of the three available cribriform ASD device sizes (18, 25, or 35 mm) was implanted. Patients were followed for at least 1 year after the procedure. Thirteen patients had successful cribriform ASD device implantation (median age and weight, 12.5 years and 36 kg, respectively). Ten patients (62%) had an associated atrial septal aneurysm. The mean procedure time was 75.6 +/- 28.5 min and the mean fluoroscopy time 14.8 +/- 6.3 min. The RVEDD was significantly reduced, from a mean of 24.2 mm to 21.0 (p < 0.05). One patient developed atrial tachycardia requiring cardioversion during the procedure. There were no embolic events, heart block, or mortality. Complete closure was 10 of 13 (77 %) the next day and 12 of 13 (92%) at 6 and 12 months. We conclude that the cribriform Amplatzer device can be successfully and safely used in patients with F-ASDs. Complete closure may take up to 6 months.

Intraoperative device closure of secundum atrial septal defect with a right anterior minithoracotomy in 100 patients

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to report our experience using intraoperative device closure of secundum atrial septal defects and to evaluate the feasibility and clinical outcome of this technique.

METHODS

One hundred patients with secundum atrial septal defects (mean age, 29 +/- 16 years; age range, 5-71 years; mean weight, 54 +/- 18 kg; weight range, 16-94 kg) underwent intraoperative device closure through a right minithoracotomy without cardiopulmonary bypass and fluoroscopy. A 2.5- to 3-cm parasternal or submammary incision was made in the right third or fourth intercostal space. Exposed with a miniretractor, a specially designed plastic sheath loaded with the device was inserted through the purse-string sutures placed on the right atrium. Under transesophageal echocardiographic guidance, it was advanced through the atrial septal defect into the left atrium, and the device was deployed in place.

RESULTS

The procedure was successful in all patients, including 5 patients with double atrial septal defects. The maximum diameter of the atrial septal defect ranged from 5 to 37 mm (mean, 21 +/- 7 mm). There were 61 patients with an atrial septal defect diameter of more than 20 mm, 16 of them with a diameter of more than 30 mm. The mean size of implanted devices was 25 +/- 7 mm (range, 8-36 mm). Residual shunts were found in 9 (9%) patients immediately after the operation. The complete occlusion rate was 95% at discharge, 99% at the 3-month follow-up, and 100% at the 1-year follow-up. There were no other late complications during the follow-up period.

CONCLUSIONS

Intraoperative device closure is a safe, cost-effective, cosmetic, and less-invasive operation of most secundum atrial septal defects. Follow-up results are encouraging. It can be considered an acceptable alternative to transcatheter closure or surgical repair.

Transcatheter closure of complex atrial septal defects: feasibility and mid-term results

OBJECTIVE

Transcatheter closure of atrial septal defects (ASDs) is currently a reliable alternative to surgery, even though challenging in the case of complex septal anatomy. The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility and mid-term results of percutaneous closure of complex ASDs in a tertiary referral centre compared with simple ASD closure.

METHODS

Between April 2000 and November 2004, 209 patients were submitted to transcatheter ASD closure; 83 patients (39.7%) presented with a complex defect (large ASDs with a deficient rim or a multifenestrated/aneurysmal septum) and were treated using different devices tailored to the atrial septal anatomy.

RESULTS

The transcatheter procedure was successful in 72 patients (86.8%), using a single device in 69 patients and two devices in the remaining three patients. Overall, 71 Amplatzer septal occluders, two multifenestrated Amplatzer septal occluders and two Cardioseal/Starflex devices were used. Procedural and fluoroscopy times were 141 +/- 45 min and 28 +/- 22 min, respectively (P < 0.0001 vs. simple ASD closure for both comparisons). Procedure-related complications were recorded in nine patients (12.5%) (P < 0.01 vs. simple ASD closure). One patient required surgical repair of a femoral arteriovenous fistula and another developed mitral valve dysfunction. Immediate ASD occlusion was recorded in 59.7% of patients, reaching 95.9% at the last follow-up control (P = NS vs. simple ASD closure for both comparisons).

CONCLUSIONS

Percutaneous closure of complex ASDs may be considered technically feasible, relatively safe and highly effective, although the procedure is still significantly more demanding than transcatheter closure of simple ASDs.