Combined right transradial coronary angiography and selective carotid angiography: safety and feasibility in unselected patients

The 'Trawl Fishing' Technique: A Quick Engagement of the Left Common Carotid Artery With the Simmons Catheter During Carotid Artery Stenting From the Right Radial Approach

BACKGROUND

Transradial approach for carotid artery stenting (TRCAS) is an established technique in specific anatomies potentially associated with high periprocedural event rate from femoral catheterization. The engagement of left common carotid artery originating from the aortic arch is the most challenging scenario requiring specific catheters and techniques.

METHODS

Among 542 consecutive TRCAS 66 had left, non-bovine carotid stenosis as the target vessel. We retrospectively compared the feasibility, safety, efficacy, fluoroscopy time and radiation exposure of two different techniques, the standard (ST) and the 'trawl-fishing' (TFT), to engage the LCCA with the 5F, 125 cm-long Simmons-2 catheter.

RESULTS

The ST was initially used in 20 patients with a technical success of 85 % (17/20). In the following 46 patients, the TFT was successfully tested first as bailout after ST failure in 12 cases and as first option in the remaining 34 patients. Full technical success was obtained in all patients at the first attempt. No MACCEs or vascular complications occurred in all patients. Fluoroscopy time and radiation exposure were significantly lower with the TFT vs. ST (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

TFT represents a definite improvement in the technique of LCCA engagement during TRCAS.

Efficacy and Safety of "Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Angiography" with Right Transradial Access versus Left Transradial Access and Femoral Access: a Retrospective Comparative Study

Objective

Over the past 10 years, the rate of patients who have undergone coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery has increased twofold in cases of coronary angiography. Today, transradial access is the first choice for coronary angiography. We aimed to compare the efficacy and reliability of radial versus femoral access for coronary angiography in post-CABG surgery in this study.

Methods

Data from 442 patients who underwent post-CABG surgery between 2012-2017 were retrospectively compared. The right radial route was used in 120 cases, the left radial route in 148, and femoral route in 174. These three pathways were compared in terms of procedure time and fluoroscopy time, efficacy, and complication development. Comparisons among the three groups were performed with Bonferroni test for continuous variables and chi-square or Fisher's exact test for nominal variables as a binary.

Results

Comparison results indicate that femoral access was better than left radial access and the left radial access was better than right radial access in terms of fluoroscopy time (10.71±1.65, 10.94±1.25, 16.12±5.28 min, P<0.001) and total procedure time (17.28±1.68, 17.68±2.34, 23.04±5.84 min, P<0.001). The left radial pathway was the most effective way of viewing left internal mammary artery (LIMA). No statistically significant differences were found among the three groups in other graft visualizations, all minor complications, total procedure and fluoroscopy time "Except LIMA imaging". Mortality due to processing was not observed in all three groups.

Conclusion

The left radial route is preferred over right radial access for post-CABG angiography because the left radial pathway is close to the LIMA and is similar to the femoral pathway. In LIMA graft imaging, right radial access is a reliable route, even though it is not as effective as other pathways. We hope that the right radial pathway will improve with physician experience and innovations.

Effectiveness of a handmade "New Carotid Catheter" in transradial carotid angiography: A comparison with conventional multipurpose catheters

OBJECTIVE

The incidence and severity of carotid atherosclerosis increases in proportion with coronary artery disease and its severity. A special catheter specifically used for transradial carotid angiography has not yet been marketed. In this study, we investigate the feasibility and safety of our carotid catheter, which was made by reshaping currently available catheters.

METHODS

Between 2010 and 2017, a total of 921 patients with indications for carotid angiography were identified after angiographic examinations and included in the study. Carotid angiography was performed in 403 patients (female, n = 161) using the 3.5 JL catheter, while in 518 (female, n = 207) patients, new catheters were employed. The new catheter was shaped like a hook in the laboratory with a heat gun. Demographic information and angiographic data from the patients in both groups were retrospectively analyzed.

RESULTS

The baseline characteristics of both groups were comparable. When compared with the use of a 3.5 JL catheter, right transradial carotid angiographies performed with our new handmade catheter resulted in lesser amounts of opaque material used (55 mL vs 66 mL, P < 0.001) and shorter total fluoroscopy time, (3.60 ± 1.85 min vs 3.14 ± 1.55 min, P < 0.001). The handmade catheter also resulted in a higher success rate of selective visualization (97% vs 40%, P < 0.001). Rates of minor complication were comparable between the two catheters (6.5% vs 6.6% P = 234). Neither permanent damage nor morbidity or mortality was observed in either arm.

DISCUSSION

Currently available catheters and methods are inadequate for routine transradial carotid angiography. For routine transradial carotid angiography, innovatively designed catheters are required. The catheter we developed for transradial carotid angiography was more successful than the conventional catheter in obtaining satisfactory images. High quality images can be obtained with the newly designed catheters.

CONCLUSION

Transradial carotid angiography can be performed using our newly developed carotid catheter. The carotid arteries of patients with widespread coronary artery disease can be visualized, while asymptomatic patients carrying a high risk of stroke can be treated, preventing potential stroke occurrence. In a larger-scale comparative study, the favorable contributions of routine use of the new method and a decreased frequency of stroke may be demonstrated.

The feasibility of bypass graft angiography by right radial access

Background and Objectives

Left transradial coronary angiography may result in damage of both radial arteries in patients who experienced right radial access. In some patients, the left radial artery has been used as a graft. We investigated whether graft angiography using right radial access is feasible in patients with bypass surgery to preserve the left radial artery as a future graft.

Subjects and Methods

A total of 109 consecutive patients with bypass surgery who had undergone right radial access underwent graft angiography via the same access.

Results

Sixteen (15%) patients were excluded because of the presence of a severely tortuous right subclavian artery. Bypass graft angiography via right radial or brachial access was completed successfully in 90 (97%) out of 93 patients. In 3 (3%) of patients, femoral access was needed to complete the angiography. Saphenous vein grafts were cannulated selectively in 150 (90%) of 167 grafts with satisfactory image quality and not found even on the aortogram in the other 17 (10%) grafts. Ninety-two (89%) out of 103 left mammary grafts were cannulated selectively or semi-selectively using a modified Simmons catheter, resulting in satisfactory image quality. The other 11 (11%) grafts were visualized non-selectively using a Judkins Left catheter, and resulting in acceptable image quality in 10 (91%) grafts. There were no procedure-related complications.

Conclusion

Graft angiography via right radial access can be performed reliably in most patients that lack severe subclavian tortuosity.

Transradial approach for carotid artery stenting: A feasibility study

BACKGROUND

Carotid artery stenting (CAS) has become accepted as an alternative to carotid endarterectomy for revascularization of the internal carotid artery (ICA) among high risk patients. CAS from the femoral approach can be problematic due to access site complications as well as technical difficulties related to peripheral vascular disease (PVD) and/or anatomical variations of the aortic arch. The purpose of the present study is to evaluate the feasibility of the radial artery as an alternative approach for CAS.

METHODS

Forty-two patients (mean age 71 +/- 1, 26 male) underwent CAS. All had a CA stenosis greater than 80% and comorbid conditions increasing the risk of carotid endarterectomy. The target common carotid artery (CCA) was initially cannulated via the radial artery using a 5F Simmons 1 diagnostic catheter which was then advanced to the external CA (ECA) over an extra support 0.014" coronary guidewire. After removing the coronary guidewire, a 0.035" guidewire was advanced into the ECA, and the Simmons 1 was exchanged for a 5F or 6F shuttle sheath and positioned in the distal CCA. In four patients with a bovine aortic arch, the left CCA was accessed with a 5F Amplatz R2 catheter which was then exchanged for a shuttle sheath over a 0.035" guidewire. CAS was performed using standard techniques with weight-based bivalirudin for anticoagulation.

RESULTS

CAS was successful in 35/42 (83%) patients, including 28/29 (97%) right CA, 4/5 (80%) bovine left CA, 7/13 (54%) left CA. Mean interventional time was 30 +/- 3 minutes. The sheath was removed immediately after the procedure. There were no radial access site complications. One patient sustained a stroke 24 hrs after the procedure with complete resolution of symptoms (Mean NIH stroke scale 2.0 +/- 0.3 before, 1.9 +/- 0.3 after). Median hospital stay was 2 +/- 0.6 days. Inadequate catheter support at the origin of the CCA was the technical cause of failure in the seven unsuccessful cases.

CONCLUSION

CAS using the transradial approach appears to be safe and technically feasible. The technique may be particularly useful in patients with right ICA lesions and severe PVD or unfavorable arch anatomy, and among patients with a bovine aortic arch.

Screening angiography of supraaortic vessels performed by invasive cardiologists at the time of cardiac catheterization: indications and results

An aging population makes multiple vascular distributions more likely in patients arriving at the cath lab for coronary artery angiography or complete cardiac catheterization. Whether or not screening angiography of supraaortic vessels can be performed at the time of cardiac catheterization by the invasive cardiologist is still debatable. We sought to determine safety and utility of performing angiography of supraaortic vessels during cardiac catheterization. Medical records of all patients undergoing combined coronary and noncoronary angiography between May 1998 and December 2002 was retrospectively reviewed. One hundred and forty patients (80 males, mean age 67.8 +/- 5.4 years) underwent combined cardiac catheterization and angiography of supraaortic vessels. Carotid artery angiography was performed at the same time of cardiac catheterization in 62 patients and subclavian artery angiography in the other 78 patients. Significant findings were reported in 32 (22.8%) patients. Complications included 1 transient ischemic attack and 2 carotid spasm resolved with nitrates infusion. In most cases the same standard catheters used during coronary angiography were used also for noncoronary angiography (119 patients, 85%). The incidence of significant angiographic findings and the relatively frequent association of CAD with supraaortic vessel atherosclerosis supports combined cardiac catheterization and angiography of supraaortic arteries but only in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease.

Evidence against the widespread use of angiography of noncoronary arteries during coronary artery angiography and cardiac catheterization

PURPOSE

Although the most widely used screening techniques for extracardiac atherosclerotic distributions are noninvasive, in patients undergoing coronary arteriography, the question as to whether angiography of extracardiac arteries at the time of cardiac catheterization is really effective or if it should be considered malpractice is still open. We sought to determine the safety and real usefulness of angiography of extracardiac arteries performed by trained invasive cardiologists during cardiac catheterization.

METHODS

Medical records of all patients undergoing combined coronary and noncoronary angiography between May 1998 and December 2002 were retrospectively reviewed. Moderate to severe arterial stenosis (>50% stenosis), vessel occlusion, aneurysmal, or severe ectasia were noted as significant angiographic findings.

RESULTS

Two hundred and seventy patients (165 males, mean age = 67.7+/-9.2 years, mean serum creatinine = 1.1+/-0.8 mg/dl) underwent combined cardiac catheterization and angiography of extracardiac arteries following specific indications. Significant findings were reported in 66 (24.4%) patients. Logistic regression analyses revealed three-vessel coronary artery disease [CAD; odds ratio (OR)=9.917; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 2.2 to 43.8; P = .002) and hypercholesterolemia (OR = 2.851; 95% CI=1.03 to 7.9; P = .044) to be independent predictors of extracardiac atherosclerotic involvement. Complications rate was negligible. The detection of significant angiographic findings led to endovascular treatment in 37.8% and surgical vascular repair in 33.3% of cases.

CONCLUSIONS

Angiography of extracardiac arteries at the time of coronary angiography appears justified only in patients with specific indications, multivessel CAD, and hypercholesterolemia.

Routine transradial access for conventional cerebral angiography: a single operator's experience of its feasibility and safety

The purpose of this study is to describe a single operator's experience with the feasibility and safety of transradial access in conventional cerebral angiography. 153 patients were enrolled consecutively. Among them, 20 patients were not suitable for transradial access. A Simmons catheter was used. Haemostasis was achieved using a compressive dressing of the wrist. We analysed the success rates of the arterial puncture and the successful catheterization rate for each supra-aortic vessel as well as all complications. The arterial access was successful in 96.3%. The supra-aortic vessels were catheterized with success rates of 99.2% (127/128) for the left subclavian artery and 100% for the other arteries. The mean procedure time was 19.3 min (range 10-55 min). Haemostasis was successfully achieved in every case. The most frequent complication was arm pain which occurred in 37 patients (28.9%). In conclusion, transradial selective cerebral angiography with a reversed-angle catheter is technically feasible and safe. It might be helpful in imaging follow-up of patients with arterial stenting or coil embolisation of the cerebral aneurysms. Modification of the catheter design is required to improve the selectivity of the supra-aortic branches.

Prevalence and clinical predictors of severe tortuosity of right subclavian artery in patients undergoing transradial coronary angiography

We investigated the prevalence and clinical predictors of severe tortuosity of the right subclavian artery (RSA) in 2,341 consecutive patients who underwent transradial coronary angiography as well as the feasibility and safety of a technique to complete transradial catheterization. Severe tortuosity of the RSA was seen in approximately 10% of these patients, and clinical predictors included systemic hypertension, female gender, older age, nonsmoker, short stature, and high body mass index. Guidewire replacement with a stiff guidewire is reliable and safe for completing transradial angiography in most patients with a tortuous RSA.