Treatment of unstable angina pectoris with percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA)

[Therapy of cardiogenic shock : A success story of German cardiology]

In contrast to the situation in the 1960s and 1970s, the mortality risk for patients with myocardial infarction has been clearly reduced, particularly for those with myocardial infarction with cardiogenic shock (MICS). Approximately 5‑10 % of patients with a myocardial infarction are affected by a MICS and the mortality risk is between 30 % and 50 %. The primary percutaneous coronary intervention with stent implantation should be carried out as quickly as possible in order to reduce the mortality to around 20 %. This article gives an overview of the currently available options for conservative and fibrinolytic treatment of MICS, of the interventional treatment of cardiogenic shock in the era of intravenous and intracoronary infarct treatment as well as without thrombolysis. In addition, the currently available mechanical support systems and the possibilities for surveillance and monitoring of patients are presented.

Drug-eluting stents versus bare-metal stents for acute coronary syndrome

BACKGROUND

Approximately 3.7 million people died from acute coronary syndrome worldwide in 2012. Acute coronary syndrome, also known as myocardial infarction or unstable angina pectoris, is caused by a sudden blockage of the blood supplied to the heart muscle. Percutaneous coronary intervention is often used for acute coronary syndrome, but previous systematic reviews on the effects of drug-eluting stents compared with bare-metal stents have shown conflicting results with regard to myocardial infarction; have not fully taken account of the risk of random and systematic errors; and have not included all relevant randomised clinical trials.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the benefits and harms of drug-eluting stents versus bare-metal stents in people with acute coronary syndrome.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, Embase, LILACS, SCI-EXPANDED, and BIOSIS from their inception to January 2017. We also searched two clinical trials registers, the European Medicines Agency and the US Food and Drug Administration databases, and pharmaceutical company websites. In addition, we searched the reference lists of review articles and relevant trials.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised clinical trials assessing the effects of drug-eluting stents versus bare-metal stents for acute coronary syndrome. We included trials irrespective of publication type, status, date, or language.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We followed our published protocol and the methodological recommendations of Cochrane. Two review authors independently extracted data. We assessed the risks of systematic error by bias domains. We conducted Trial Sequential Analyses to control the risks of random errors. Our primary outcomes were all-cause mortality, major cardiovascular events, serious adverse events, and quality of life. Our secondary outcomes were angina, cardiovascular mortality, and myocardial infarction. Our primary assessment time point was at maximum follow-up. We assessed the quality of the evidence by the GRADE approach.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 25 trials randomising a total of 12,503 participants. All trials were at high risk of bias, and the quality of evidence according to GRADE was low to very low. We included 22 trials where the participants presented with ST-elevation myocardial infarction, 1 trial where participants presented with non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction, and 2 trials where participants presented with a mix of acute coronary syndromes.Meta-analyses at maximum follow-up showed no evidence of a difference when comparing drug-eluting stents with bare-metal stents on the risk of all-cause mortality or major cardiovascular events. The absolute risk of death was 6.97% in the drug-eluting stents group compared with 7.74% in the bare-metal stents group based on the risk ratio (RR) of 0.90 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.78 to 1.03, 11,250 participants, 21 trials/22 comparisons, low-quality evidence). The absolute risk of a major cardiovascular event was 6.36% in the drug-eluting stents group compared with 6.63% in the bare-metal stents group based on the RR of 0.96 (95% CI 0.83 to 1.11, 10,939 participants, 19 trials/20 comparisons, very low-quality evidence). The results of Trial Sequential Analysis showed that we did not have sufficient information to confirm or reject our anticipated risk ratio reduction of 10% on either all-cause mortality or major cardiovascular events at maximum follow-up.Meta-analyses at maximum follow-up showed evidence of a benefit when comparing drug-eluting stents with bare-metal stents on the risk of a serious adverse event. The absolute risk of a serious adverse event was 18.04% in the drug-eluting stents group compared with 23.01% in the bare-metal stents group based on the RR of 0.80 (95% CI 0.74 to 0.86, 11,724 participants, 22 trials/23 comparisons, low-quality evidence), and Trial Sequential Analysis confirmed this result. When assessing each specific type of adverse event included in the serious adverse event outcome separately, the majority of the events were target vessel revascularisation. When target vessel revascularisation was analysed separately, meta-analysis showed evidence of a benefit of drug-eluting stents, and Trial Sequential Analysis confirmed this result.Meta-analyses at maximum follow-up showed no evidence of a difference when comparing drug-eluting stents with bare-metal stents on the risk of cardiovascular mortality (RR 0.91, 95% CI 0.76 to 1.09, 9248 participants, 14 trials/15 comparisons, very low-quality evidence) or myocardial infarction (RR 0.98, 95% CI 0.82 to 1.18, 10,217 participants, 18 trials/19 comparisons, very low-quality evidence). The results of the Trial Sequential Analysis showed that we had insufficient information to confirm or reject our anticipated risk ratio reduction of 10% on cardiovascular mortality and myocardial infarction.No trials reported results on quality of life or angina.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

The current evidence suggests that drug-eluting stents may lead to fewer serious adverse events compared with bare-metal stents without increasing the risk of all-cause mortality or major cardiovascular events. However, our Trial Sequential Analysis showed that there currently was not enough information to assess a risk ratio reduction of 10% for all-cause mortality, major cardiovascular events, cardiovascular mortality, or myocardial infarction, and there were no data on quality of life or angina. The evidence in this review was of low to very low quality, and the true result may depart substantially from the results presented in this review.More randomised clinical trials with low risk of bias and low risks of random errors are needed if the benefits and harms of drug-eluting stents for acute coronary syndrome are to be assessed properly. More data are needed on the outcomes all-cause mortality, major cardiovascular events, quality of life, and angina to reduce the risk of random error.

Unstable Angina Pectoris: An Interventional Approach to Management

The therapy of unstable angina has changed consider ably in the last 15 years. An improved understanding of the pathophysiology has led to many of the changes. Thrombus, platelet activation, progression of athero sclerosis, and coronary vasospasm all appear to have a role. Initial management in unstable angina should begin with aggressive medical therapy with nitrates, calcium antagonists, beta blockers, and aspirin. In patients who are refractory to aggressive medical management, early cardiac catheterization and coronary arteriography is in dicated. The literature appears to confirm that patients with unstable angina who are stabilized with aggressive medical therapy fare as well as those treated with emer gency bypass surgery. Percutaneous transluminal coro nary angioplasty (PTCA) is the treatment of choice in medically refractory unstable angina patients with single-vessel coronary disease.

New approaches include culprit lesion angioplasty, thrombolytic therapy, coronary sinus retroperfusion, and new catheter-based revascularization methods such as intracoronary stents, laser methods and atherectomy. Culprit lesion angioplasty involves angioplasty of only the angina-producing artery in patients with multivessel coronary disease. Early data suggest that this may be an effective short-term alternative to multivessel PTCA or bypass surgery. Recent data also suggest a beneficial role for thrombolytic therapy and synchronized coronary si nus retroperfusion with arterial blood in patients with unstable angina. New catheter-based approaches are in the early stages of development, and their eventual role in the treatment of coronary artery disease and unstable angina remains to be elucidated.

Transluminal coronary angioplasty--state of the art 1984

Since its introduction in 1977 by Grüntzig, percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) has been increasingly applied to the treatment of coronary artery disease manifested by symptomatic ischemia. Initially only recommended for proximal short stenoses of one major coronary artery, the indication for PTCA has gradually been enlarged. Today even distally situated coronary stenoses in more than one vessel can be dilated successfully by using a steerable system. In experienced hands, an immediate improvement can be achieved in about 90% of the patients. In the realm of cost and morbidity PTCA offers obvious advantages over bypass surgery. However, indications for PTCA are more restricted than those for bypass surgery, specially in multi-vessel disease where the application of PTCA is still controversial. Moreover, long-term results are less favourable after PTCA since 25-30% of the patients show a recurrence within 6 to 12 months. Although PTCA will not replace coronary bypass surgery, it is already established as an alternative and complementary method for coronary revascularization.

Silicon carbide-coated stents in patients with acute coronary syndrome

Silicon carbide (aSIC-C) is a stent coating with antithrombogenic as well as anti-inflammatory properties as compared with uncoated stainless steal based on in vitro and in vivo studies. This study investigated the potential of this coating in patients with unstable angina. At 38 study sites, 485 patients were randomized to an aSIC-C (n = 238) or a conventional stainless steal stent (n = 247). Patient were classified according to angina at rest within last 48 hr to Braunwald in class IIB (= 314) and IIIB (n = 171). The primary endpoint was a combination of death, myocardial infarction, or ischemia-driven target vessel revascularization at 6 months. Complications of procedures performed at 0.4 +/- 1.1 days after admission occurred at lower rates than previously reported in this high-risk population, but the primary endpoint was not different between the study groups. Only in Braunwald class IIIB patients did the primary endpoint occur less frequently in patients with an aSIC-C stent as compared to patients with a conventional stent (5.8% vs. 15.3%; P = 0.049). At 9-month follow-up, the level of difference was maintained, but statistical significance was lost. Quantitative angiography revealed no significant difference between the stents in the subgroups. This study suggests that aSIC-C stents exert clinically measurable effects in patients with unstable angina with recent symptoms at rest. This coating deserves further clinical investigation and may serve as platform for antiproliferative drugs.

Coronary microembolization--its role in acute coronary syndromes and interventions

The diagnosis coronary artery disease is classically based on patient's symptoms and morphology, as analyzed by angiography. The importance of risk factors for the development of coronary atherosclerosis and disturbance of coronary vasomotion is clearly established. However, microembolization of the coronary circulation has also to be taken into account. Microembolization may occur as a single or as multiple, repetitive events, and it may induce inflammatory responses. Spontaneous microembolization may occur, when the fibrous cap of an atheroma or fibroatheroma (Stary i.v. and Va) ruptures and the lipid pool with or without additional thrombus formation is washed out of the atheroma into the microcirculation. Such events with progressive thrombus formation are known as cyclic flow variations. Plaque rupture occurs more frequently than previously assumed, i.e. in 9% of patients without known heart disease suffering a traffic accident and in 22% of patients with hypertension and diabetes. Also, in patients dying from sudden death microembolization is frequently found. Patients with stable and unstable angina show not only signs of coronary plaque rupture and thrombus formation, but also microemboli and microinfarcts, the only difference between those with stable and unstable angina being the number of events. Appreciation of microembolization may help to better understand the pathogenesis of ischemic cardiomyopathy, diabetic cardiomyopathy and acute coronary syndromes, in particular in patients with normal coronary angiograms, but plaque rupture detected by intravascular ultrasound. Also, the benefit from glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor antagonist is better understood, when not only the prevention of thrombus formation in the epicardial atherosclerotic plaque, but also that of microemboli is taken into account. Microembolization also occurs during PTCA, inducing elevations of troponin T and I and elevations of the ST segment in the EKG. Elevated baseline coronary blood flow velocity, as a potential consequence of reactive hyperemia in myocardium surrounding areas of microembolization, is more frequent in patients with high frequency rotablation than in patients with stenting and in patients with PTCA. The hypothesis of iafrogenic microembolization during coronary interventions is now supported by the use of aspiration and filtration devices, where particles with a size of up to 700 microns have been retrieved. In the experiment, microembolization is characterized by perfusion-contraction mismatch, as the proportionate reduction of flow and function seen with an epicardial stenosis is lost and replaced by contractile dysfunction in the absence of reduced flow. The analysis of the coronary microcirculation, in addition to that of the morphology and function of epicardial coronary arteries, and in particular appreciation of the concept of microembolization will further improve the understanding of the pathophysiology and clinical symptoms of coronary artery disease.

Subacute thrombotic complications after intracoronary implantation of Palmaz-Schatz stents

Despite excellent results as a bail-out procedure for the management of abrupt closure after balloon angioplasty and the potential beneficial effects on restenosis after angioplasty, intracoronary stenting is limited, especially by subacute stent thrombosis. In 100 consecutive patients with intracoronary implantation of 118 Palmaz-Schatz stents, 10 patients (10%) developed subacute stent thrombosis during their hospital course 3 to 9 days after implantation. Therapy included intravenous thrombolysis, mechanical recanalization by balloon angioplasty, and emergency bypass surgery. Although successful recanalization was maintained in eight of nine nonsurgically treated patients within 2 hours after the onset of symptoms, seven patients developed myocardial infarction, with two patients having Q wave myocardial infarction and five patients having non-Q wave myocardial infarction. By univariate analysis, several variables could be identified as risk factors for the development of subacute stent thrombosis: bail-out implantations (odds ratio: 6.42; 95% confidence interval: 1.53 to 26.38; p = 0.007), unstable angina (12.32; 1.50 to 101.37; p = 0.006), long (5.44; 1.31 to 22.65; p = 0.015) and complex (type C) lesions (8.17; 1.93 to 34.50; p = 0.002) with large plaque areas (9.85; 1.96 to 44.51; p = 0.002), symptomatic postangioplasty dissections (4.36; 1.10 to 16.90; p = 0.029), incomplete wrapping of the dissection after stenting (6.50; 1.10 to 42.30; p = 0.039), and vessel irregularities distal to the stented segment (21.70; 4.12 to 113.18; p < 0.001). These variables, except the variable large plaque area, were confirmed as independent predictors of subacute stent thrombosis by a stepwise multivariate logistic regression analysis.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Short and long term results after intracoronary stenting in human coronary arteries: monocentre experience with the balloon-expandable Palmaz-Schatz stent

OBJECTIVE

Intracoronary stenting was designed to overcome acute complications after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty and to achieve a reduced rate of restenosis, both of which are major limitations of this well accepted method for treating coronary heart disease. This report describes the experience at one centre with the implantation of balloon-expandable Palmaz-Schatz stents and focuses on device related complications and the short and long term angiographic outcome.

DESIGN

A retrospective data analysis.

PATIENTS

Stenting was attempted in 50 patients. Restenosis after an initially successful angioplasty procedure, inadequate postangioplasty results, saphenous coronary bypass stenoses, and bail-out situations were regarded as indications.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES AND RESULTS

In 49 of 50 attempted patients 61 stents (1-4 per patient) were implanted. Delivery problems occurred in three patients and were successfully overcome in two patients. Bail-out situations were successfully managed in 16 patients. Complications included acute thrombus formation within the stent immediately after implantation in one patient, which was successfully treated by thrombolysis. One patient was sent for bypass surgery the day after implantation; another died 10 days after implantation for unknown reasons. Subacute stent thrombosis occurred in seven patients 5-9 days after implantation and was successfully treated by thrombolysis or balloon angioplasty in five patients. Bleeding complications occurred in nine patients, five of whom required blood transfusions. Angiography showed long term vessel patency after 4-6 months in 31 (76%) of the 41 patients who were followed up, restenosis in six (14%), and reocclusion in four (10%). Late restenosis or reocclusion was found in five (15%) of 33 patients with a single stent in contrast to five (63%) of eight patients with multiple stents.

CONCLUSIONS

Balloon-expandable intracoronary stenting is a feasible method for treating the acute complications of balloon angioplasty. It reduced the rate of restenosis for single stent implantation. Subacute thrombotic events must be regarded as previously unknown and serious complications.

Results of intracoronary stents for management of coronary dissection after balloon angioplasty

Dissections after coronary balloon angioplasty are risk factors for acute or subacute vessel closures. Intracoronary stenting was developed to avoid these complications by pressing the intimal and medial flaps against the vessel wall, thus reducing the risk of acute thrombosis. A total of 22 stents were implanted into the coronary arteries of 15 patients with dissections after balloon angioplasty causing angina pectoris or ischemic electrocardiographic changes. Stent delivery was successful in all cases. In 1 patient acute stent thrombosis was documented and treated successfully by thrombolytic therapy. Another patient underwent coronary artery bypass surgery 24 hours later because of persisting angina. Angiograms after 24 hours documented vessel patency in the remaining 14 patients. Late control angiograms after 4 to 6 months were obtained in 12 of 14 patients. Vessel patency without significant restenosis was observed in 8 patients, restenosis in 3 and reocclusion in 1 patient. All 3 patients with multiple stent implantation had restenosis (n = 2) or reocclusion (n = 1), compared with 1 patient with single stent implantation. Thus, intracoronary stenting appears to be a secure and effective method of handling bailout situations caused by dissection after balloon angioplasty, with good long-term results when only a single stent is implanted.

Higher recurrence rate after coronary angioplasty in unstable angina pectoris

PURPOSE

Recurrent stenosis after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) is a significant problem, requiring repeat dilation in about one-third of all treated patients. Various clinical and procedure-related predictors have been proposed. Between 1983 and 1987, 257 patients underwent 322 procedures, where 380 stenoses were attempted. Indications were: stable angina pectoris 73%, unstable angina pectoris 22%, other indication 5%. The primary success rate was defined as a less than 50% remaining postprocedure stenosis.

FINDINGS

Repeat angiograms were done for 88% of the initially successful cases, either six months after PTCA or if there was a clinical recurrence. Restenosis was defined as a recurrence of a more than 50% diameter stenosis. The restenosis rate was 33% and was significantly higher (p less than 0.05) for unstable (46%) than for stable angina pectoris (29%). There was a nonsignificant tendency to a higher restenosis rate in the left anterior descending artery than in the other coronary vessels.

IMPLICATIONS

The increased restenosis rate seen after PTCA for unstable angina pectoris could be caused by a higher activity in systems affecting the proliferative processes in the smooth muscle cells of the arterial wall, which is thought to form the pathophysiologic basis for restenosis after PTCA.

Analysis of risk factors for restenosis after PTCA

To identify risk factors for restenosis, we evaluated data in 473 patients with single-vessel percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) and control angiography after 6 months. Restenosis, defined as (1) loss greater than 50% of the initial gain, and (2) stenosis greater than 50% was found in 138 patients (29.2%). Univariate analysis revealed eight factors related to restenosis: (1) duration of symptoms less than 1 month (P = 0.005), (2) unstable angina (P = 0.004), (3) high-grade stenosis before PTCA (P = 0.014), (4) large residual stenosis after PTCA (P = 0.001), (5) insufficient improvement of stenosis (P = 0.042), (6) prolonged single inflation time (P = 0.017), (7) prolonged total inflation time (P = 0.055), and (8) low inflation pressure (P = 0.028). Multivariate analysis revealed four factors significantly related to restenosis: (1) large residual stenosis after PTCA (P = 0.0001), (2) prolonged single inflation time (P = 0.0047), (3) unstable angina (P = 0.0127), and (4) high-grade stenosis before PTCA (P = 0.0179). Modification of procedural factors might be helpful to reduce the risk of restenosis after successful PTCA.

Coronary revascularization after intravenous tissue plasminogen activator for unstable angina pectoris: results of a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial

To determine the role of intravenous tissue plasminogen activator (t-PA) in unstable angina, it was compared with placebo in a randomized, double-blind trial. Forty patients with angina at rest and provocable ischemia (pacing induced) had baseline coronary angiography, study drug infusion and then repeat angiography at 20 +/- 9 hours. All patients received diltiazem, nitrates, beta blockers, aspirin and intravenous heparin. During study drug infusion (150 mg over 8 hours), refractory ischemia necessitating emergency bypass surgery (CABG) or coronary angioplasty (PTCA) occurred in 4 of 20 t-PA patients compared with 1 of 20 placebo patients (p = 0.21). Before discharge, revascularization for persistent, provocable ischemia and a residual stenosis greater than or equal to 60% was as follows: t-PA patients, 8 PTCA and 7 CABG; placebo patients, 11 PTCA and 8 CABG (p = 0.39). Quantitative angiographic percent diameter stenosis of the culprit artery at baseline and follow-up was: t-PA 71 +/- 17 and 63 +/- 22; placebo 70 +/- 19 and 67 +/- 22 (difference not significant). However, 3 t-PA patients compared with no placebo patients demonstrated an insignificant (less than 60% diameter) residual stenosis and averted PTCA (p = 0.14). There were no complications of PTCA in the 8 t-PA patients; in contrast, 3 of 11 placebo patients had abrupt closure, necessitating emergency CABG in 2 (p = 0.23). Thus, intravenous t-PA in unstable angina can eliminate the need for PTCA in a few patients, does not appear to decrease the overall or emergency rate of revascularization procedures and may facilitate the safety of PTCA.

Results of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty for angina pectoris early after acute myocardial infarction

Between May 1980 and July 1985, 70 patients underwent percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) for angina occurring 24 hours after and within 30 days of acute myocardial infarction (32 with Q-wave infarction and 38 with non-Q-wave infarction). One-vessel disease was present in 42 (60%) and multivessel in 28 (40%); the mean ejection fraction was 0.56 (greater than or equal to 0.50 in 77% of patients). PTCA was successful in 56 patients (80%) and after introduction of steerable dilating systems in February 1983 this rate became 86%. The success rate for complete occlusions was 76%. The interval from myocardial infarction to PTCA was similar in patients with successful dilation (12.7 +/- 8.1 days) and those without (13.4 +/- 8.0 days). PTCA failed in 14 patients (20%); 8 underwent emergency coronary artery bypass for acute occlusion and 4 of 6 patients whose lesions could not be crossed had elective bypass surgery. There was 1 operative death. No patient sustained a Q-wave infarction. Three patients had non-Q-wave infarctions after technically successful PTCAs. Mean follow-up was 27 months (6 to 67 months). Of the 56 patients successfully dilated, 14 (25%) had 15 cardiac events during follow-up: death (1), non-Q-wave infarction (2), repeat PTCA (7), coronary bypass (4) and recurrence of severe angina (1). The cumulative mortality was 3% and the reinfarction rate was 7% (no Q-wave reinfarctions). Forty-two (60%) of the 70 patients were free of complicating events acutely and during follow-up.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty of one vessel for refractory unstable angina pectoris: efficacy in single and multivessel disease

Forty patients with unstable angina refractory to medical treatment had one vessel percutaneous transluminal angioplasty to the most stenotic lesion in a major coronary artery. The procedure was successful in 35 patients, and the remaining five patients underwent emergency coronary artery bypass graft surgery. The initial success rate (84%) for the 16 patients with single or the 19 patients with multivessel disease (90%) was similar. At early follow up (average nine days) all patients with successful angioplasty remained symptomatically improved; 10 patients (83%) with single and 10 patients (63%) with multivessel disease had negative treadmill stress tests. Five of six cardiac events occurred within the intermediate (average 11 months) follow up period; two patients had recurrent refractory unstable angina, two had angioplasty for progression of disease in a vessel not previously treated by angioplasty, and one had bypass graft surgery. During late (average 26 months) follow up one patient had a non-fatal myocardial infarction while seven patients (58%) with single vessel disease and nine patients (75%) with multivessel disease had negative stress tests; 29 of 40 patients showed long term improvement.

Angiographic occurrence and clinical correlates of intraluminal coronary artery thrombus: role of unstable angina

The importance of intraluminal coronary artery thrombus in acute myocardial infarction is now recognized. Coronary thrombi, however, may be important in ischemic syndromes other than infarction. The coronary angiograms of 268 consecutive patients undergoing diagnostic angiography were prospectively examined for intracoronary thrombus and form the basis of this study. Of these patients, 29 (11%) (25 men and 4 women) met the criteria for coronary artery thrombus. Of the 29 patients with thrombus, 24 (83%) had unstable angina before angiography. The five remaining patients with thrombus had had a transmural myocardial infarction 3 to 18 months before cardiac catheterization. In 21 patients, the thrombus was distal to a significant stenosis; in 8 it was proximal to or at the site of a significant stenosis. Coronary artery thrombus was identified in 24 (35%) of 67 patients with unstable angina compared with only 5 (2.5%) of 201 patients with stable angina (p less than 0.0001).

Sequential intervention procedures after intracoronary thrombolysis; balloon dilatation, bypass surgery, and medical treatment

After successful intracoronary thrombolysis of an acute myocardial infarction in 145 patients subsequent intervention procedures were evaluated. In 48 of 62 patients (43%), percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty was performed successfully (success rate 77%), 41 patients (28%) were operated on and 56 patients (39%) were treated only medically. During the hospital phase in the angioplasty group, 4 reinfarctions were noted and 3 repeat angioplasties were required, while 41 of the 48 successfully treated patients (85.4%) remained clinically stable. In the surgical group, one cardiac failure occurred, while 40 patients (97.6%) were without cardiac event. In the medical group, 5 patients died (8.9%), 8 patients (14.3%) had a reinfarction, and 76.8% were clinically stable. During the follow-up period in the surgical group of 6 months 37 patients (90.2%) were clinically stable, all in functional classes I and II. In the angioplasty group 33 patients were stable (68.8%), and in the medical group 26 patients were stable (46.6%). In the whole group of 145 patients the hospital mortality together with that in the 6 months follow-up period was 9.7% with a reinfarction rate of 22.8%.

Role of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty in the treatment of unstable angina. Report from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Percutaneous Transluminal Coronary Angioplasty and Coronary Artery Surgery Study Registries

The acute and long-term consequences of PTCA performed in patients with unstable angina was determined in 442 patients with 1-vessel CAD who were enrolled in the NHLBI PTCA Registry. These patients were compared with 214 similar patients in the PTCA Registry with stable angina and with 330 patients with unstable angina from the NHLBI CASS Registry who underwent CABG. The 3 groups had similar baseline characteristics. The immediate angiographic success after PTCA was not different between patients with stable and those with unstable angina. The in-hospital mortality rate was 0.9% for the PTCA group with unstable angina and 0.47% for the PTCA group with stable angina. The combined 18-month mortality and MI rate was low in both groups (10.8 and 9.5%, respectively). No differences were observed in the mortality and MI rates between patients with unstable angina treated surgically or with PTCA. Both revascularization procedures markedly reduced symptoms of angina. Ninety-two percent of the PTCA group reported improvement in their angina, whereas 80% of the surgical group had a reduction in angina (p less than 0.05). The results from this observational study suggest that PTCA can be performed as safely and successfully in patients with unstable angina as in those with stable angina. PTCA compares favorably with CABG in patients with unstable angina in that the procedure is associated with low mortality and morbidity rates, while marked improvement in symptoms can be expected. Thus, PTCA could be considered an alternative to CABG in patients with unstable angina who have the appropriate anatomic characteristics.

Percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty in patients with stable and unstable angina pectoris: analysis of early and late results

Percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) was performed in 50 patients with stable and in 50 patients with unstable angina pectoris, each patient showing an isolated stenosis of more than 80% of the cross-sectional area of a single coronary artery. The technical success rate was 66% in the stable groups (26 of 37 patients [70%] with left anterior descending artery [LAD], 7 of 12 patients [58%] with right coronary artery [RCA]) and 74% in the unstable group (27 of 34 patients [79%] with LAD, 10 of 15 patients [67%] with (RCA). The increase in stenotic area in the unstable group exceeding that in the stable group for LAD stenoses (41.5 +/- 15.1% vs 32.3 +/- 14.5%, p less than 0.03), while in RCA stenoses the results in the stable group were better (45.1 +/- 17.6% vs 32.7 +/- 12.3%, n.s.). One acute vessel occlusion necessitating an emergency bypass operation occurred in each group (2%). The patient in the stable group died (total mortality rate 1%). Sixty-three of the successfully treated patients were routinely restudied 6 months later. According to clinical symptoms, 23% of the stable and 36% of the unstable group were in functional classes III and IV. From the anatomical viewpoint, a restenosis (greater than 85%) was found in 17% of the stable and in 24% of the unstable group. A further spontaneous decrease (greater than 10%) of the vessel obstruction was found in 47% of the stable group and in 12% of the unstable group.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty immediately after intracoronary streptolysis of transmural myocardial infarction

Percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) was performed in 21 patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) treated by intracoronary infusion of streptokinase within 8 hours after the onset of symptoms. Streptolysis therapy began a mean of 3.6 +/- 1.2 hours (+/- SD) after the onset of symptoms. The vessel was occluded in 14 patients and highly stenosed in seven. After the infusion of 67,300 +/- 63,200 IU of streptokinase over 26.1 +/- 21.5 minutes, patency of the occluded vessels was reached. PTCA as performed 20-60 minutes after the end of streptokinase treatment in 19 patients and 24 and 31 hours after treatment in two patients. The dilation was successful in 17 patients (81%). The degree of vessel obstruction was reduced from 90.2 +/- 7.3% to 58.6 +/- 19.5% (area method) and from 71.4 +/- 12.4% to 39.2 +/- 19.7% (diameter method). The improvement was 31.5 +/- 18.4% and 32.2 +/- 19.3%, respectively. No reocclusion was induced by PTCA. Twenty patients were discharged. One died during hospitalization; at autopsy, the treated vessel was still patent. During the follow-up period, two reinfarctions and one asymptomatic reocclusion occurred. The clinical findings during the hospital course and the follow-up period were compared with those of a control group of 18 patients with AMI and comparable coronary stenoses who were treated only with streptokinase infusion. Four of these patients had a reinfarction during the hospital course, and three died during the follow-up period. PTCA can be performed safely and successfully immediately after intracoronary infusion of streptokinase in patients with AMI. By reducing the subtotal stenosis, this treatment contributes to the reperfusion of the ischemic myocardium, diminishes the risk of a reocclusion and seems to improve the prognosis.