Nonselective preoperative digital subtraction angiography of internal mammary arteries

Prevalence of left internal mammary artery disease in patients undergoing coronary angiography for suspected coronary artery disease: A meta-analysis and meta-regression study

Left internal mammary artery (LIMA) to bypass left anterior descending artery has demonstrated to improve survival in multivessel coronary artery disease, but its routine angiography during index coronary angiography is seldom performed as LIMA is rarely diseased. A systematic literature review and meta-analysis was conducted using PubMed and Cochrane databases selecting the studies reporting prevalence of LIMA disease among patients undergoing coronary angiography and considered for CABG. Meta-regression analysis was performed to evaluate the prevalence of LIMA disease and the relative predictive value of canonical risk factors. After scrimmage, 9 studies for a total of 1365 patients were included. LIMA disease prevalence was 1.8 % (95 % CI; 1.2 %-2.8 %) in the entire cohort, whereas we reported a rate of subclavian artery disease of 7.6 % (95 % CI, 6-9.9 %). At univariate meta-regression analysis, only age (p = 0.031) and smoking habit (p = 0.035) were directly correlated with LIMA disease. In conclusion, LIMA angiographic assessment might be considered in selected patients that could undergo CABG, during index coronary angiography. However, prospective studies are needed to better evaluate the safety of routine selective LIMA angiography prior to CABG and whether the practice is associated with improved clinical outcomes among those individuals.

Vascular profile of patients with multivessel coronary artery disease

PURPOSE

Early and accurate diagnosis of peripheral atherosclerosis is of paramount importance for global management of patients with known coronary artery disease (CAD). We sought to retrospectively evaluate the clinical relevance of significant subclavian artery stenosis (SAS) and abdominal vessel stenosis or aneurysm (AVA) in patients undergoing coronary angiography.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

Medical records of consecutive patients underwent coronary angiography at two public institutions over a 12-month period were evaluated. Angiographic results of patients underwent coincident diagnostic abdominal aorta angiography to evaluate abdominal vessels or subclavian angiography on the basis of clinical and angiographic criteria were analyzed.

RESULTS

During the study period, 724 consecutive patients (535 males, mean age 68.1+/-11 years) were enrolled (Table 2): a significant atherosclerotic disease of at least one arterial segments were observed in 198 patients (27.3%). Angiographically significant SAS was observed in 18/220 patients (8.1%) undergoing concomitant subclavian artery angiography and candidates to coronary surgery using the internal mammary artery. Ten patients with subclavian artery stenosis and upper limb ischemia underwent subclavian artery angioplasty and stenting and bypass surgery using LIMA. AVA were reported in 180 (35.7%) of 504 consecutive patients: renal artery stenosis was found in 13.1% of cases (66 patients), aortoiliac artery disease in 13.7 % (69 patients), and aortic aneurismal disease in 8.9% (45 patients). Logistic regression analyses revealed > or =3-vessel CAD (odds ratio [OR] 9.917, p=0.002), age>60 years old (OR 3.817, p=0.036), > or =3 risk factors (OR 2.8, p=0.048) as independent predictors of SAS and AVA.

CONCLUSION

Patients with multivessel CAD are frequently aged, have an high risk profile and multiple vascular atherosclerotic distributions, suggesting the usefulness of a more global and comprehensive cardiovascular approach.

Malpractice in Invasive Cardiology: Is Angiography of Abdominal Aorta or Subclavian Artery Appropriate in Patients Undergoing Coronary Angiography?

BACKGROUND

Identification of peripheral vascular disease by angiography in patients undergoing coronary angiography may be considered as malpractice but sometimes seems to be justified under clear entry criteria. The present mata-analysis is aimed to analyze the appropriateness and results of screening angiography of subclavian or abdominal aorta performed at the time of coronary angiography.

METHODS

A search of published literature for peripheral angiography in patients undergoing coronary angiography over the last 10 years was performed using the MEDLINE database. No language restriction was employed. Only studies enrolling more than 100 patients for abdominal aortography and 50 patients for subclavian/internal mammary artery angiography were considered. Reference lists from identified studies were also reviewed to identify other potentially relevant references.

RESULTS

Twenty-nine studies were retrieved: 8 articles about subclavian artery (SA) and internal mammary (IMA) angiography and 21 about renal (RA) and aortoiliac (AOI) angiography. The total number of patients enrolled was 27,936. Nine studies out of 29 were prospective. Defined entry criteria were reported in 24 out of 29 studies. Significant SA and IMA stenosis were reported in 5.5 and 9% of patients, respectively. RA stenosis >50% was present in 12.7% of patients with CAD. Finally, undetected AOI disease was reported in 35.5% of patients undergoing coronary angiography. Mean complication rate was 0.8 +/- 0.6%. Predictors of SA and IMA stenosis were unclear. Age, multi-risk profile, multi-vessel CAD, history of PVD or carotid disease, severe hypertension, unexplained renal dysfunction or decreased creatinine clearance have been reported most frequently as predictors of RA and AOI disease in patients undergoing coronary angiography.

CONCLUSIONS

Consistent evidence of appropriateness of renal angiography in selected patients undergoing coronary angiography have been produced in literature. IMA and AOI angiography seem to be not justified unless they are part of SA in patients scheduled for arterial conduit with brachial differential pressure, thoracic irradiation or surgery, or of abdominal angiography to detect RA stenosis in laboratories with radiological digital peripheral equipment.

Bilateral selective internal mammary artery angiography via right radial approach: clinical experience with newly designed Yumiko catheter

The radial artery has been increasingly used as a primary access site for coronary angiography and intervention. But the technique for internal mammary artery (IMA) visualization via the right radial artery has not been well described. Therefore, the study was conducted to investigate the feasibility, safety, and adequacy of selective bilateral IMA angiography via the right radial artery using the recently developed Yumiko catheter. From November 1999 to October 2000, both IMA angiographies were undertaken immediately following the diagnostic coronary angiogram taken from right transradial approach in 114 patients. IMA angiography was successfully obtained in 99% (113/114) patients. For left IMA angiography, 73 (64%), 28 (25%), and 12 (11%) imagings were obtained in a selective, a semiselective, and a nonselective way, respectively. After initial periods of 33 left-IMA-only imaging, right IMA angiography was obtained in 81 patients (phase 2). Selective right IMA imaging was done in 73 (90%), semiselective in 6, and nonselective in 2 patients. The reasons for failure of selective or semiselective visualization were severe vascular tortuosity, far distal anatomical origin of left IMA and ulcerative plaque, or acutely angled left subclavian artery. The feasibility and safety of selective and semiselective bilateral IMA angiography were demonstrated using a 5 Fr Yumiko catheter from the right radial approach. Cathet Cardiovasc Intervent 2001;54:19-24.

Internal mammary arteriography without selective cannulation using a new balloon occlusion catheter

Internal mammary artery (IMA) angiography can be difficult and time-consuming. We evaluated a custom designed balloon-tipped catheter, a Berman catheter (Arrow International, Reading, PA) modified by creating an end-hole to allow passage of a wire through the central lumen, for imaging the IMA without selective cannulation. We compared ease of use, procedure time, and image quality of the new catheter with the standard selective catheter technique. Thirty-six patients with IMA grafts were randomly assigned to imaging with either the study catheter or a standard catheter. Image quality, graded from poor to excellent, time to catheter placement in the subclavian artery (TIME 1), time to initial IMA angiography (TIME 2), and the difference between these two (TIME 3) were recorded. TIME 3 defined the time required to find and seat the catheter at the IMA site. The image quality was good or excellent in all but one patient. This one patient, randomized to the standard catheter technique, had poor image quality with the selective catheter. However, exchange for the study catheter resulted in excellent image quality. There was no difference in TIME 1 (P = 0.57) or TIME 2 (P = 0.55) between the two techniques. There was a significant difference in TIME 3 (P = 0.05) favoring the study catheter. There were no complication using either technique and the total contrast volume used was not significantly different between the two techniques (P = 0.32). We conclude that a new catheter technique for imaging the IMA without selective cannulation is safe, fast, easy to use, and may offer particular advantage in patients whose internal mammary artery is difficult to access.

Internal mammary artery angiography should be a routine component of diagnostic coronary angiography

Left internal mammary artery (LIMA) angiography was performed with diagnostic coronary angiography in 130 cases for which the coronary findings made use of the LIMA as a bypass graft a consideration. In 98% of the cases the approach to LIMA angiography was femoral with a 5F LIMA catheter first directed into the proximal subclavian and then advanced over a guidewire placed into the distal subclavian well beyond the origin of the LIMA. After withdrawing the wire the catheter was brought proximally to selectively cannulate and visualize the LIMA with nonionic contrast media. The only complication was a single transient occipital visual field loss. LIMA caliber too narrow to permit use as a graft was found twice, LIMA occlusion unrelated to prior surgery was found once, and LIMA occlusion related to prior surgery was found twice. Subclavian and/or vertebral stenosis was present five times. Large proximal branches of the LIMA best identified prior to surgery were present 12 times. Based on this experience, LIMA angiography 1) can be performed safely with a high degree of success, 2) demonstrates significant findings in 15% of cases, and 3) should therefore be performed whenever coronary angiographic findings make it appropriate to consider LIMA to coronary artery bypass grafting.