Complete atrioventricular block during cardiac catheterization: two cases reports in patients without pre-existing conduction abnormalities

Intra-procedural arrhythmia during cardiac catheterization: A systematic review of literature

BACKGROUND

Cardiac catheterization is among the most performed medical procedures in the modern era. There were sporadic reports indicating that cardiac arrhythmias are common during cardiac catheterization, and there are risks of developing serious and potentially life-threatening arrhythmias, such as sustained ventricular tachycardia (VT), ventricular fibrillation (VF) and high-grade conduction disturbances such as complete heart block (CHB), requiring immediate interventions. However, there is lack of systematic overview of these conditions.

AIM

To systematically review existing literature and gain better understanding of the incidence of cardiac arrhythmias during cardiac catheterization, and their impact on outcomes, as well as potential approaches to minimize this risk.

METHODS

We applied a combination of terms potentially used in reports describing various cardiac arrhythmias during common cardiac catheterization procedures to systematically search PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane databases, as well as references of full-length articles.

RESULTS

During right heart catheterization (RHC), the incidence of atrial arrhythmias (premature atrial complexes, atrial fibrillation and flutter) was low (< 1%); these arrhythmias were usually transient and self-limited. RHC associated with the development of a new RBBB at a rate of 0.1%-0.3% in individuals with normal conduction system but up to 6.3% in individuals with pre-existing left bundle branch block. These patients may require temporary pacing due to transient CHB. Isolated premature ventricular complexes or non-sustained VT are common during RHC (up to 20% of cases). Sustained ventricular arrhythmias (VT and/or VF) requiring either withdrawal of catheter or cardioversion occurred infrequently (1%-1.3%). During left heart catheterizations (LHC), the incidence of ventricular arrhythmias has declined significantly over the last few decades, from 1.1% historically to 0.1% currently. The overall reported rate of VT/VF in diagnostic LHC and coronary angiography is 0.8%. The risk of VT/VF was higher during percutaneous coronary interventions for stable coronary artery disease (1.1%) and even higher for patients with acute myocardial infarctions (4.1%-4.3%). Intravenous adenosine and papaverine bolus for fractional flow reserve measurement, as well as intracoronary imaging using optical coherence tomography have been reported to induce VF. Although uncommon, LHC and coronary angiography were also reported to induce conduction disturbances including CHB.

CONCLUSION

Cardiac arrhythmias are common and potentially serious complications of cardiac catheterization procedures, and it demands constant vigilance and readiness to intervene during procedures.

Complete heart block complicating retrograde left ventricular catheterization: case report and review

Complete heart block (CHB) following retrograde left ventricular catheterization is uncommon. We report a case of transient CHB in a patient with severe aortic stenosis and bifascicular block on the baseline surface electrocardiogram during retrograde left ventricular catheterization. The block resolved spontaneously without sequelae. A review of the literature using MedLine was performed and recommendations for temporary and permanent pacing are outlined.

Complete heart block complicating retrograde left-heart catheterization of patients with cardiac allografts

The development of complete heart block during left-sided cardiac catheterization is an uncommon event. We describe three cases of complete heart block complicating left-sided cardiac catheterization of patients with cardiac allografts. Review of the cases performed at our institution suggests that complete heart block during left-sided catheterization may be more common in patients with cardiac allografts.

Coronary and left ventricular pacing as standby in invasive cardiology

Coronary pacing using as unipolar negative electrode a guidewire placed in a coronary branch was tested in 349 sites of 300 consecutive patients undergoing coronary angioplasty. It was possible for 339 sites (97%). The threshold currents ranged from 1 to 15 (mean +/- standard deviation 3.4 +/- 2.4) mA. Side effects were seen in 13 patients (4%): 6 (2%) had transient coronary spasm, 4 (1%) had diaphragmatic stimulation, and 3 (1%) had stinging pain at the skin electrode. Of the 10 cases with pacing failure, left ventricular pacing was successfully tested in 5 by introducing the coronary wire or another wire into the left ventricle. It yielded a threshold of 2-8 (3.2 +/- 2.7) mA. Therapeutic pacing for significant bradycardia was required in 7 patients (2%). It was successful in all. Coronary or left ventricular pacing appears to be a simple and reliable temporary measure. When there is no wire in the coronary artery or for diagnostic catheterization, left ventricular pacing can be done using the same setup and any type of guidewire.