Effect of exercise on indices of valvular aortic stenosis

Abnormal ventricular repolarization in long QT syndrome carriers is related to short left ventricular filling time and attenuated stroke volume response during exercise

BACKGROUND

Long QT syndrome (LQTS) carriers are characterized by abnormal ventricular repolarization, prolonged systole, and mechanical dispersion. Prolonged left ventricular (LV) systole has been shown to result in disproportionate shortening of LV filling in other conditions. The aim of this study was to assess LV filling, diastolic function, and stroke volume (SV) response to dynamic exercise, in a group of LQTS carriers.

METHODS

Forty-seven LQTS carriers (45 ± 15 years, 20 symptomatic) and 35 healthy individuals underwent bicycle stress echocardiogram. Electrocardiographic and echocardiographic measurements were obtained at rest, peak exercise, and 4 minutes into recovery.

RESULTS

Long QT syndrome carriers and controls did not differ in age, gender, heart rate, QRS duration, or LV ejection fraction. At rest, LQTS carriers had longer QTc and shorter filling time (FT). At peak exercise, QTc increased and remained longer than controls at recovery. A negative correlation was found between QTc and FT (r = -.398, P = .001) with greater fall in FT in LQTS carriers than in controls at peak exercise (-23% ± 10 vs +2% ± 3, P < .0001). FT correlated with SV (r = +.27, P = .001), which increased more in controls than in LQTS carriers (+32% ± 4 vs +2% ± 1, P < .05). These differences were more pronounced in symptomatic LQTS carriers who had shorter FT and smaller SV at peak exercise and during recovery compared to asymptomatics (P < .05).

CONCLUSIONS

Long QT syndrome carriers have longer QTc, but also shorter FT. These disturbances worsen at peak exercise (particularly in symptomatics) compromising LV filling and SV, hence a potential pathomechanism for adverse events.

Impact of blood pressure on the Doppler echocardiographic assessment of severity of aortic stenosis

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the impact of blood pressure (BP) on the Doppler echocardiographic (Doppler-echo) evaluation of severity of aortic stenosis (AS).

METHODS

Handgrip exercise or phenylephrine infusion was used to increase BP in 22 patients with AS. Indices of AS severity (mean pressure gradient (DeltaP(mean)), aortic valve area (AVA), valve resistance, percentage left ventricular stroke work loss (% LVSW loss) and the energy loss coefficient (ELCo)) were measured at baseline, peak BP intervention and recovery.

RESULTS

From baseline to peak intervention, mean (SD) BP increased (99 (8) vs 121 (10) mm Hg, p<0.001), systemic vascular resistance (SVR) increased (1294 (264) vs 1552 (372) dynexs/cm(5), p<0.001) and mean (SD) transvalvular flow rate (Q(mean)) decreased (323 (67) vs 306 (66) ml/s, p = 0.02). There was no change in DeltaP(mean) (36 (13) vs 36 (14) mm Hg, p = NS). However, there was a decrease in AVA (1.15 (0.32) vs 1.09 (0.33) cm(2), p = 0.02) and ELCo (1.32 (0.40) vs 1.24 (0.42) cm(2), p = 0.04), and an increase in valve resistance (153 (63) vs 164 (74) dynexs/cm(5), p = 0.02), suggesting a more severe valve stenosis. In contrast, % LVSW loss decreased (19.8 (6) vs 16.5 (6)%, p<0.001), suggesting a less severe valve stenosis. There was an inverse relationship between the change in mean BP and AVA (r = -0.34, p = 0.02); however, only the change in Q(mean) was an independent predictor of the change in AVA (r = 0.81, p<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Acute BP elevation due to increased SVR can affect the Doppler-echo evaluation of AS severity. However, the impact of BP on the assessment of AS severity depends primarily on the associated change in Q(mean), rather than on an independent effect of SVR or arterial compliance, and can result in a valve appearing either more or less stenotic depending on the direction and magnitude of the change in Q(mean).

Hemodynamic stability of valve area, valve resistance, and stroke work loss in aortic stenosis: a comparative analysis

BACKGROUND

Although aortic valve area (AVA) has provided the standard index for assessing aortic stenosis severity, valve resistance and percent left ventricular stroke work (%LVSW) loss have been proposed as alternative flow independent indices of stenosis severity that may provide a more stable measure under diverse hemodynamic conditions. In 30 patients with moderate or severe aortic stenosis (AVA < or = 1.2 cm(2)), Doppler echocardiography indices of AVA, valve resistance, and %LVSW loss were measured at multiple transvalvular flow rates during dobutamine infusions (0-10 microg/kg/min) to compare their hemodynamic stability.

RESULTS

From baseline to maximum dobutamine dose in the 30 patients, transvalvular flow rate increased 43% and resulted in a 42% increase in mean transvalvular pressure gradient, a 15% increase in Doppler AVA, and a 26% increase in %LVSW loss. Group mean valve resistance did not change for the total cohort. For individual patients, AVA and %LVSW loss demonstrated a linear relationship with transvalvular flow (median r = 0.74 and 0.84, respectively). In contrast, both flow-mediated increases and decreases in valve resistance were observed in individual patients, resulting in the apparent stability of the group mean valve resistance in the total cohort. For individual patients, Doppler AVA and valve resistance demonstrated comparable stability in response to changes in hemodynamic conditions and were significantly more stable than mean transvalvular pressure gradient and %LVSW loss.

CONCLUSION

Doppler AVA and valve resistance provide stenotic indices of equivalent hemodynamic stability. However, transvalvular flow has a predictable directional effect on AVA and an unpredictable directional effect on valve resistance, potentially limiting valve resistance as a measure of hemodynamic severity.

Stress Echocardiography in Aortic Stenosis: Insights into Valve Mechanics and Hemodynamics

Stress interventions have been classically combined with cardiac catheterization recordings to understand the hemodynamic principles of valvular stenosis. Indices of aortic stenosis such as pressure gradient and valve area were based on simple hydraulic principles and have proved to be clinically useful for patient management during a number of decades. With the advent of Doppler echocardiography, these hemodynamic indices can be readily obtained noninvasively. Abundant evidence obtained using exercise and pharmacological stress echocardiography has demonstrated that the assumptions of classic hemodynamic models of aortic stenosis were wrong. Consequently, it is recognized that conventional indices may be misleading indicators of aortic stenosis significance in particular clinical situations. To improve diagnostic accuracy, several alternative hemodynamic models have been developed in the past few years, including valve resistance and left ventricular stroke work loss, among others. Nevertheless, these more-accurate indices should be obtainable noninvasively and need to demonstrate greater diagnostic and prognostic power than conventional indices; preliminary data suggest such superiority. Stress echocardiography is well established as the tool of choice for testing hypothesis and physical models of cardiac valve function. Although the final role of alternative indices is not yet well established, the new insights into valvular hemodynamics provided by this technique may change the clinical assessment of aortic stenosis.

Planimetry and transthoracic two-dimensional echocardiography in noninvasive assessment of aortic valve area in patients with valvular aortic stenosis

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to evaluate the reliability of transthoracic two-dimensional echocardiography in measuring aortic valve area (AVA) by planimetry.

BACKGROUND

Planimetry of AVA using two-dimensional transesophageal echocardiographic images has been reported to be a reliable method for measuring AVA in patients with aortic stenosis. Recent advances in resolution of two-dimensional echocardiography permit direct visualization of an aortic valve orifice from the transthoracic approach more easily than before.

METHODS

Forty-two adult patients with valvular aortic stenosis were examined. A parasternal short-axis view of the aortic valve was obtained with transthoracic two-dimensional echocardiography. AVA was measured directly by planimetry of the inner leaflet edges at the time of maximal opening in early systole. AVA was also measured by planimetry using transesophageal echocardiography, by the continuity equation and by cardiac catheterization (Gorlin formula).

RESULTS

In 32 (76%) of the 42 study patients, AVA could be detected by using the transthoracic planimetry method. There were good correlations between results of transthoracic two-dimensional echocardiographic planimetry and the continuity equation (y = 0.90x + 0.09, r = 0.90, p < 0.001, SEE = 0.09 cm2), transesophageal echocardiographic planimetry (y = 1.05x - 0.02, r = 0.98, p < 0.001, SEE = 0.04 cm2) and the Gorlin formula (y = 1.02x + 0.05, r = 0.89, p < 0.001, SEE = 0.10 cm2).

CONCLUSIONS

Transthoracic two-dimensional echocardiography provides a feasible and reliable method in measuring AVA in patients with aortic stenosis.

Prospective study of asymptomatic valvular aortic stenosis. Clinical, echocardiographic, and exercise predictors of outcome

BACKGROUND

Only limited data on the rate of hemodynamic progression and predictors of outcome in asymptomatic patients with valvular aortic stenosis (AS) are available.

METHODS AND RESULTS

In 123 adults (mean age, 63 +/- 16 years) with asymptomatic AS, annual clinical, echocardiographic, and exercise data were obtained prospectively (mean follow-up of 2.5 +/- 1.4 years). Aortic jet velocity increased by 0.32 +/- 0.34 m/s per year and mean gradient by 7 +/- 7 mm Hg per year; valve area decreased by 0.12 +/- 0.19 cm2 per year. Kaplan-Meier event-free survival, with end points defined as death (n = 8) or aortic valve surgery (n = 48), was 93 +/- 5% at 1 year, 62 +/- 8% at 3 years, and 26 +/- 10% at 5 years. Univariate predictors of outcome included baseline jet velocity, mean gradient, valve area, and the rate of increase in jet velocity (all P < or = .001) but not age, sex, or cause of AS. Those with an end point had a smaller exercise increase in valve area, blood pressure, and cardiac output and a greater exercise decrease in stroke volume. Multivariate predictors of outcome were jet velocity at baseline (P < .0001), the rate of change in jet velocity (P < .0001), and functional status score (P = .002). The likelihood of remaining alive without valve replacement at 2 years was only 21 +/- 18% for a jet velocity at entry > 4.0 m/s, compared with 66 +/- 13% for a velocity of 3.0 to 4.0 m/s and 84 +/- 16% for a jet velocity < 3.0 m/s (P < .0001).

CONCLUSIONS

In adults with asymptomatic AS, the rate of hemodynamic progression and clinical outcome are predicted by jet velocity, the rate of change in jet velocity, and functional status.

Percutaneous transvenous mitral balloon valvuloplasty alone in patients with combined aortic and mitral stenosis

To investigate the feasibility of percutaneous transvenous balloon dilatation of the mitral valve in patients with combined aortic and mitral stenosis, 12 patients were studied by echocardiography and catheterization before and after mitral valvuloplasty. Aortic stenosis was defined from prevalvuloplasty catheterization study as a transaortic pressure gradient of more than 25 mm Hg. All 12 patients underwent transvenous balloon mitral valvuloplasty successfully. Immediately after the procedure, all patients experienced improvement in clinical symptoms and in hemodynamic variables. Mitral valve areas were significantly increased from 0.78 +/- 0.18 to 1.73 +/- 0.21 cm2 (P < 0.0001) by planimetry method. Cardiac output was significantly increased from 3.6 +/- 0.1 to 4.2 +/- 0.5 L/min (P = 0.01). Mean transaortic flow rate increased 33% (from 198 +/- 68 to 254 +/- 41 mL/s, P = 0.002). Mean pressure gradient across the aortic valve after mitral valvuloplasty was not significantly increased, from 34 +/- 7 to 37 +/- 13 mm Hg. Aortic valve areas, derived from the Gorlin formula, were significantly increased from 0.57 +/- 0.12 to 0.73 +/- 0.14 cm2 (P = 0.006) after mitral valvuloplasty. However, continuity equation-derived aortic valve area was independent of increasing flow rate after mitral valvuloplasty from 1.29 +/- 0.35 to 1.30 +/- 0.29 cm2. During follow-up with a mean of twenty four +/- fourteen months, 8 patients were in New York Heart association functional class I, 3 in class II, and 1 in class IV who received pericardiotomy owing to constrictive pericarditis without aortic valve replacement. In conclusion, mitral valvuloplasty alone may be safe and effective in alleviating symptoms in mitral stenosis patients with transaortic pressure gradient > 25 mm Hg. Continuity equation-derived aortic valve areas seem to be flow independent in evaluation of aortic stenosis and are important for decision making.

Effects of increasing flow rate on aortic stenotic indices: evidence from percutaneous transvenous balloon dilatation of the mitral valve in patients with combined aortic and mitral stenosis

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the effects of transvalvar flow rate on aortic valve resistance and valve area after percutaneous transvenous balloon dilatation of the mitral valve in a homogeneous group of patients with rheumatic heart disease.

DESIGN

Retrospective analysis of 12 patients with combined aortic and mitral stenosis who had undergone balloon dilatation of the mitral valve over a period of 9 years.

SETTING

Tertiary referral centre.

PATIENTS

Twelve (8 women, 4 men; mean (SD) age 37 (9) of 227 consecutive patients with critical mitral stenosis undergoing transvenous balloon dilation of the mitral valve in the centre also had aortic stenosis, defined as a transaortic pressure gradient of more than 25 mm Hg measured at a catheterisation study before valvuloplasty.

INTERVENTIONS

Echocardiographic variables (mitral valve area measured by the pressure half-time method and planimetry, and the aortic valve area derived from the continuity equation) and haemodynamic measurements (cardiac output, left ventricular mean systolic pressure, aortic mean pressure, transaortic valve pressure gradient, mitral valve and aortic valve areas derived from the Gorlin formula, and aortic valve resistance) were assessed before and after transvenous balloon dilatation of the mitral valve. Follow up catheterisation to measure haemodynamic variables was performed one week after mitral valvuloplasty.

RESULTS

Mean transaortic flow rate increased 33% after mitral valvuloplasty (from 198 (68) to 254 (41) ml/s, P = 0.002). Aortic valve areas derived from the Gorlin formula were significantly increased from 0.57 (0.12) to 0.73 (0.14) cm2 (P = 0.006) after mitral valvuloplasty. However, aortic valve area and valve resistance derived from the continuity equation were independent of the increase in flow rate after mitral valvuloplasty (from 1.29 (0.35) to 1.30 (0.29) cm2 and from 317 (65) to 259 (75) dyn.s.cm-5, both P = NS).

CONCLUSION

The Gorlin-derived aortic valve area tends to be flow-dependent, and continuity equation-derived aortic valve area and catheterisation-derived valve resistance seem to be less flow-dependent. In patients with combined mitral and aortic stenosis, these flow-independent indices are important for decision-making.

Effects of dobutamine on Doppler echocardiographic indexes of aortic stenosis

OBJECTIVES

This study sought to assess the diagnostic implications of the flow dependence of Doppler echocardiographic indexes of aortic valve stenosis.

BACKGROUND

Although valve area has been shown to change with alterations in flow rate, the diagnostic consequences of this phenomenon remain unknown. Valve resistance has been suggested as a more stable index for evaluating aortic stenosis.

METHODS

A low dose dobutamine protocol was performed in 35 patients with aortic stenosis. Hemodynamic indexes were obtained by Doppler echocardiography at baseline and at each dobutamine dose.

RESULTS

As a result of the shortening of the systolic ejection period, flow increased from (mean +/- SD) 164 +/- 48 to 229 +/- 102 ml/s (p < 0.0001). At peak flow, valve area increased by 28% (from 0.5 +/- 0.2 to 0.6 +/- 0.3 cm2, p < 0.0001), whereas valve resistance decreased by 4% (from 498 +/- 252 to 459 +/- 222 dynes.s.cm-5, p = 0.04). This observed change in resistance was smaller than that for valve area (p < 0.01). The flow dependence of valve area varied among individual patients (p < 0.0001). Multivariate analysis identified calcific degenerative etiology (beta 0.29, p = 0.002), left ventricular velocity of fiber shortening (beta 0.22, p = 0.01), baseline flow (beta -0.28, p = 0.04) and amount of flow increased induced by dobutamine (beta 0.90, p < 0.0001) as factors related to valve area flow dependence.

CONCLUSIONS

Although all Doppler echocardiographic indexes of aortic stenosis are affected by flow, valve resistance is more stable than valve area under dobutamine-induced hemodynamic changes. Baseline valve area may be unreliable in patients with calcific degenerative aortic stenosis and low output states.

Changes in effective aortic valve area during ejection in adults with aortic stenosis

Measurements of valve orifice area in aortic stenosis are based on the assumption that orifice area remains constant throughout ejection and is independent of transvalvular gradients and flow. Recent studies, however, have suggested that the calculated valve area of calcific aortic stenosis may change in different flow conditions. Therefore, we tested the hypothesis that in vivo effective orifice area of a stenotic aortic valve changes continuously during ejection, which would make a single area measurement a potentially inadequate indicator of the severity of the stenosis. Doppler measurements of flow velocity in the ascending aorta and in the left ventricular outflow tract at peak velocity, at half-peak velocity during acceleration (midacceleration), and at half-peak velocity during deceleration (mid-deceleration) were obtained in 26 patients with aortic stenosis (mean gradient 50 +/- 19 mm Hg and effective aortic orifice are 0.7 +/- 0.3 dcm2) and in 14 normal subjects of similar age and gender, to calculate instantaneous effective aortic orifice area at midacceleration, at peak velocity and at mid-deceleration. In the 26 patients with aortic stenosis, aortic valve area at midacceleration was 84 +/- 15% of valve area at peak velocity (p < 0.0001), and valve area at mid-deceleration was 113 +/- 17% of that measured at peak velocity (p < 0.01). Conversely, in normal subjects, aortic valve area remained constant during ejection and was 97 +/- 5% and 99 +/- 6% of valve area at peak velocity, respectively, at midacceleration and mid-deceleration (p > 0.05). In addition, in patients with aortic stenosis the percentage of change in effective aortic valve area from midacceleration to mid-deceleration varied widely, from -17% to +49% (mean change +26 +/- 14%). There was no relation between percentage of change in effective valve area and mean transaortic gradient (r = 0.05; p = 0.30) or effective valve area at peak velocity (r = -0.11; p = 0.14). Our results indicate that effective aortic valve area continues to change during ejection in patients with aortic stenosis, and that the magnitude of this change is independent of the usual indexes of severity of the stenosis. Conversely, effective aortic valve area remains constant during ejection in normal subjects.

Hemodynamic assessment of patients with low-flow, low-gradient valvular aortic stenosis

In aortic stenosis (AS), conventional indexes of severity vary with changes in transvalvular flow. It is important to determine the true severity of obstruction because AS in the presence of low cardiac output and low gradient is associated with high mortality during aortic valve replacement. This study compares 3 indexes of stenosis severity at different transvalvular flow rates in patients with low-flow, low-gradient critical AS. Eight patients with critical AS (valve area < or = 0.7 cm2), low cardiac output (< 4.0 L/min), and low mean transvalvular gradient (< or = 40 mm Hg) underwent hemodynamic assessment at baseline, after transvalvular flow was augmented with dobutamine, and after the valve opening was increased with percutaneous balloon aortic valvuloplasty. Severity of obstruction was assessed using 3 different measures: Gorlin formula calculated valve area, valvular resistance, and percentage left ventricular stroke work loss. Dobutamine infusion increased cardiac output by 35% and mean transvalvular gradient by 27%. The mean Gorlin formula calculated aortic valve area increased from 0.5 to 0.6 cm2 (p = 0.002). Percentage left ventricular stroke work loss increased from 23% to 28% (p = 0.03). Valve resistance was unchanged by dobutamine (350 to 310 dynes X sec X cm(-5); p = NS). Balloon valvuloplasty increased cardiac output 13% and decreased the gradient 31%; this resulted in an increase in the calculated valve area from 0.6 to 0.9 cm2 (p = 0.001). Percentage left ventricular stroke work loss decreased from 28% to 20% (p = 0.002), and valve resistance decreased from 310 to 181 dynes X sec X cm(-5) (p = 0.001) after valvuloplasty. We conclude that in patients with low-flow, low-gradient critical AS, valve resistance is the most flow-independent measure of severity of stenosis. All measures improve with percutaneous balloon aortic valvuloplasty.

Flow dependence of the aortic valve area in patients with aortic stenosis: assessment by application of the continuity equation

It has been argued that the aortic valve area (AVA) in patients with aortic stenosis increases with flow. Others, however, have attributed the apparent increase to flow dependence of the empiric constant in the Gorlin formula. We examined the changes in AVA during changes in transvalvular flow induced by dipyridamole infusion in 34 patients with aortic stenosis. Two-dimensional and Doppler echocardiography was used and AVA was calculated according to the continuity equation, which does not include empiric constants. Flow increased in 29, decreased in four, and was unchanged in one patient. There was a linear correlation between percent change in flow and percent change in AVA: delta AVA% = 1.1 + delta flow%. 0.56 (r = 0.72; p < 0.001) In conclusion, AVA was found to be flow dependent. The magnitude of change in AVA observed by noninvasive recordings agrees with previous invasive studies according to the Gorlin formula.

Valvular and systemic arterial hemodynamics in aortic valve stenosis. A model-based approach

BACKGROUND

Assessment of the severity of a stenotic aortic valve has been confounded by reports of flow dependence of stenosis severity. We hypothesized that the pressure gradient at the stenotic aortic valve would be dependent on the characteristics of the arterial circulation. Therefore, clinically useful measures of the severity of aortic valve stenosis may have to take this dependence into account.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We developed an analog model of the systemic arterial circulation in the presence of a stenotic aortic valve. The model clearly describes the dependence of stenosis severity (described by coefficients A and B) on the resistive and capacitive properties of the arterial system. We used high-fidelity pressure recordings obtained at the time of diagnostic cardiac catheterizations and found that a highly significant relation between the measured mean transvalvular gradient and that predicted by the model was demonstrated both at rest (r2 = .90) and with exercise (r2 = .80). Furthermore, the relative constancy of stenosis coefficients A and B was validated.

CONCLUSIONS

Transvalvular hemodynamics in patients with aortic valve stenosis are dependent on the properties of the arterial system. The current model describes such behavior, correctly predicts the transvalvular gradient from model parameters, and may be useful in the assessment of stenosis severity under various clinical and physiological conditions.

Flow dependence of measures of aortic stenosis severity during exercise

OBJECTIVES

This study was designed to investigate the effect of altering transvalvular volume flow rate on indexes of aortic stenosis severity (valve area, valve resistance, percent left ventricular stroke work loss) derived by using Doppler echocardiography.

BACKGROUND

Assessment of hemodynamic severity in aortic stenosis has been limited by the absence of an index that is independent of transvalvular flow rate. The traditional measurement of valve area by the Gorlin equation has been shown to vary with alterations in transvalvular flow. Recently, valve resistance and percent stroke work loss have been proposed as indexes that are relatively independent of flow. Although typically derived with invasive measurements, valve resistance and percent stroke work loss (in addition to continuity equation valve area) can be determined noninvasively with Doppler echocardiography.

METHODS

We performed 110 symptom-limited exercise studies in 66 asymptomatic patients with valvular aortic stenosis. Continuity equation valve area, valve resistance (the ratio between mean transvalvular pressure gradient and mean flow rate) and the steady component of percent stroke work loss (the ratio between mean transvalvular pressure gradient and left ventricular systolic pressure) were assessed by Doppler echocardiography at rest and immediately after exercise.

RESULTS

Mean transvalvular volume flow rate increased 24% (from [mean +/- SD] 319 +/- 80 to 400 +/- 140 ml/s, p < 0.0001); mean pressure gradient increased 36% (from 30 +/- 14 to 41 +/- 18 mm Hg, p < 0.0001); continuity equation aortic valve area increased 14% (from 1.38 +/- 0.50 to 1.58 +/- 0.69 cm2, p < 0.0001); valve resistance increased 13% (from 137 +/- 81 to 155 +/- 97 dynes.s.cm-5, p < 0.0001); and percent stroke work loss increased 17% (from 17.4 +/- 6.9% to 20.3 +/- 8.5%, p < 0.0001). The effects of flow on valve area, valve resistance and percent stroke work loss were independent of the presence of an aortic valve area < or = or > 1.0 cm2 or reduced transvalvular flow rate (rest cardiac output < 4.5 liters/min).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with asymptomatic aortic stenosis, Doppler echocardiographic measures of valve area, valve resistance and percent stroke work loss are flow dependent. Flow dependence is observed with valve area < or = or > 1.0 cm2 and in the presence of both normal and low transvalvular flow states. The potential effects of transvalvular flow should be considered when interpreting Doppler measures of aortic stenosis severity.

Dependence of Gorlin formula and continuity equation valve areas on transvalvular volume flow rate in valvular aortic stenosis

BACKGROUND

Valve areas derived by the Gorlin formula have been observed to vary with transvalvular volume flow rate. Continuity equation valve areas calculated from Doppler-echo data have become a widely used alternate index of stenosis severity, but it is unclear whether continuity equation valve areas also vary with volume flow rate. This study was designed to investigate the effects of changing transvalvular volume flow rate on aortic valve areas calculated using both the Gorlin formula and the continuity equation in a model of chronic valvular aortic stenosis.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Using a canine model of chronic valvular aortic stenosis in which anatomy and hemodynamics are similar to those of degenerative aortic stenosis, each subject (n = 8) underwent three studies at 2-week intervals. In each study, transvalvular volume flow rates were altered with saline or dobutamine infusion (mean, 10.3 +/- 5.1 flow rates per study). Simultaneous measurements were made of hemodynamics using micromanometer-tipped catheters, of ascending aortic instantaneous volume flow rate using a transit-time flowmeter, and of left ventricular outflow and aortic jet velocity curves using Doppler echocardiography. Valve areas were calculated from the invasive data by the Gorlin equation and from the Doppler-echo data by the continuity equation. In the 24 studies, mean transit-time transvalvular volume flow rate ranged from 80 +/- 33 to 153 +/- 49 mL/min (P < .0001). Comparing minimum to maximum mean volume flow rates, the Gorlin valve area changed from 0.54 +/- 0.22 cm2 to 0.68 +/- 0.21 cm2 (P < .0001), and the continuity equation valve area changed from 0.57 +/- 0.18 cm2 to 0.70 +/- 0.20 cm2 (P < .0001). A strong linear relation was observed between Gorlin valve area and mean transit-time volume flow rate for each study (median, r = .88), but the slope of this relation varied between studies. The Doppler-echo continuity equation valve area had a weaker linear relation with transit-time volume flow rate for each study (median, r = .51).

CONCLUSIONS

In this model of chronic valvular aortic stenosis, both Gorlin and continuity equation valve areas were flow-dependent indices of stenosis severity and demonstrated linear relations with transvalvular volume flow rate. The changes in calculated valve area that occur with changes in transvalvular volume flow should be considered when measures of valve area are used to assess the hemodynamic severity of valvular aortic stenosis.

Simplified method for calculating aortic valve resistance: correlation with valve area and standard formula

Aortic valve resistance (AVR) is a useful index to assess the severity of aortic stenosis. This study compared the standard method to calculate AVR with a simplified method based on the conventional approach for measuring vascular resistance: AVR = (peak-to-peak transaortic pressure gradient/(cardiac output*2.5))*80, where 80 is a conversion factor and 2.5 assumes that the systolic ejection period comprises 40% of the R-R cycle. We compared the standard AVR, the simplified AVR, and the Gorlin-derived value area in 118 patients with pure or dominant aortic stenosis. There was a strong linear correlation between the standard and simplified AVR (r = 0.96, p < .0001). There was a curvilinear relation between the aortic valve area and AVR (r = 0.92, p < .001). In 48 patients with aortic valve area > or = 0.7 cm2, the AVR was < 300 dynes-sec-cm-5 in 45 patients (94%) by the standard method and in 42 patients (88%) by the simplified method (p = NS). In conclusion, our method for measuring AVR is accurate and simpler than the standard method.