On-line quantitative coronary analysis in clinical practice: one step closer to reality?

A deterministic approach to automated stenosis quantification

We developed a new approach to quantitative coronary angiography (QCA), which overcomes several limitations of available programs, such as dependence on operator input; limited tracking ability; fixed correction of the point spread function (PSF); and different calibration on empty vs. contrast-filled catheters. The program (Intelligent Images QCA, version 1.4) provides absolute reproducibility by deterministic, operator-independent identification of the skeleton and the edges of the coronary tree. The algorithm works as follows: application of a matched filter to emphasize selectively the coronary arteries; adaptive threshold binarization; binary thinning and skeletonization; perpendicular resampling with sub-pixel interpolation; derivative filtering; minimal cost edge detection; and automatic identification and quantification of the stenosis. Operator's interaction is restricted to definition of a region of interest; editing of either skeleton or edges is not allowed. PSF correction is fine-tuned to the actual frequency response of the imaging chain by calibration on a contrast-filled conical lucite phantom. Catheter calibration is carried out by a second derivative-based edge detection much less sensitive to the presence of contrast. In vitro phantom analysis (0. 5 to 5.0 mm) showed accuracy of 0.028-0.031 mm and precision of 0. 054-0.062 mm on nonmagnified images from the angio TV chain and the cine projector, respectively. In vivo evaluation on a series of consecutive diagnostic angiograms yielded correct contour detection of 70/73 stenoses (96%); interobserver intraframe MLD variability 0. 00 mm; correct tracking of catheter edges 100%; interobserver variation coefficient of catheter calibration 3.3%; and mean difference of calibration factor on contrast-filled vs. empty catheters 2.7%. This new approach significantly improves reproducibility with respect to conventional QCA, maintaining high accuracy, precision, and applicability. Cathet. Cardiovasc. Intervent. 48:435-445, 1999.

[Reliability of digital coronary quantification in a hemodynamic laboratory. Comparison with a film-based system]

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Quantitative coronary angiography can be performed in two ways: on-line during catheterism, and off-line once the procedure is finished. Consequently, several studies have been published comparing both systems. Nevertheless, none of them has compared the measurements made off-line with those acquired on-line by the hemodynamist in charge of procedure. The objective of this study was to compare the measurements made on-line by the hemodynamist involved in the procedure with a digital system (DCI) with those obtained off-line by an independent and alien observer to the procedure by using film-based system (CMS).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Forty coronary lesions suitable for quantification were measured in a prospective fashion. They came from follow-up angiograms. Either balloon or stent were used in the previous angioplasty. Stenoses were assessed on-line and off-line by using the most severe view as judged by the hemodynamist.

RESULTS

No significant differences were found for obstruction diameter, reference diameter nor percent diameter stenosis. Pearson's correlation coefficient values (r), intraclass correlation coefficient (ri), regression line equation and mean of signed differences with their standard deviations are showed: a) obstruction diameter: r = 0.83, ri = 0.83, DCI = 0.42 + 0.76 x CMS, -0.01 +/- 0.42 mm; b) reference diameter: r = 0.72, ri = 0.69, DCI = 1.29 + 0.61 x CMS, 0.003 +/- 0.38 mm, y c) percent diameter stenosis: r = 0.86, ri = 0.86, DCI = 10.05 + 0.77 x CMS, 1.19 +/- 10.75%.

CONCLUSIONS

We attained good concordance between both quantification systems under clinical conditions. In our opinion these results support the use of on-line quantification as a reliable tool for clinical decision making in the catheterization laboratory.

Which variable of stenosis severity best describes the significance of an isolated left anterior descending coronary artery lesion? Correlation between quantitative coronary angiography, intracoronary Doppler measurements and high dose dipyridamole echocardiography

OBJECTIVES

This study sought to investigate the angiographic or intracoronary Doppler variables of stenosis severity that best correlate with the results of dipyridamole echocardiography.

BACKGROUND

Quantitative coronary angiography and intracoronary Doppler flow velocity assessments are the commonly used techniques for the objective identification of significant coronary artery stenosis.

METHODS

Thirty patients with an isolated lesion of the left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD) were studied by means of on-line quantitative coronary arteriography, intracoronary Doppler flow velocity measurements and dipyridamole echocardiography 6 months after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. The quantitative arteriographic analyses were performed on-line; post-stenotic Doppler flow velocities were measured at baseline and after adenosine infusion. Angiographic and Doppler measurements were compared with the corresponding dipyridamole echocardiographic data and analyzed by discriminant analysis.

RESULTS

The dipyridamole echocardiographic response was positive in 11 patients (37%). The best cutoff values for predicting an abnormal echocardiographic response were 1) stenotic flow reserve of 2.8 (p = 0.0001); 2) 59% diameter stenosis (p = 0.0001); 3) minimal lumen diameter of 1.35 mm (p = 0.001); 4) coronary flow reserve of 2.0 (p = 0.0002); and 5) maximal peak velocity of 60 cm/s during hyperemia (p = 0.04). Multivariate analysis identified stenotic flow reserve as the only independent predictor of ischemia during dipyridamole echocardiography.

CONCLUSIONS

Stenotic flow reserve is the variable that best describes the functional significance of an isolated LAD lesion, and a value of 2.8 is the best predictor of a positive dipyridamole echocardiographic response. Furthermore, angiographic variables of stenosis severity relate to echocardiographic test results better than intracoronary Doppler variables.

Parameters that influence accuracy and precision of quantitative coronary arteriography

The limited resolution of any imaging system causes edge blurring of objects acquired with X-ray. In digital angiography, this effect combined with noise gives rise to systematic and random errors in the determination of vessel dimensions. The influence of bandwidth limitation on the estimation of tube diameter is established by a theoretical approach: it leads to over and underestimations of catheter and vessel diameter dimensions. Therefore a correction is proposed that counterbalances the point spread function (PSF) offset. The residual inaccuracy and the variability of measurement of phantom tubes are analyzed and evaluated in controlled conditions. Some of the parameters which govern their extent are identified: field-of-view, catheter size, concentration of contrast agent.