Transcatheter closure of residual atrial septal defect following implantation of buttoned device

Transcatheter occlusion of complex atrial septal defects

Percutaneous device occlusion of secundum atrial septal defects (ASDs) is becoming an accepted alternative to surgical closure. This method allows us to evaluate patients with complex conditions for treatment. From a total of 70 patients with ASD evaluated for percutaneous closure, we selected for analysis 28 who had complex conditions. The mean age was 36+/-23 yr (range, 4-72). Six had heart failure, and of these six, three had atrial fibrillation. At cardiac catheterization, the pulmonary pressure was 47+/-24 mm Hg, and the QP/QS was 1.7+/-0.4; two patients had bidirectional shunt and systemic pulmonary pressure. Two patients received a buttoned device and 26 an Amplatzer septal occluder. The groups of patients with complex conditions were separated into the following groups. Group I (n = 4) underwent combined treatment of associated anomalies. Two patients had pulmonary stenosis, one had mitral stenosis, and one had an aortic root-left atrium fistula. They were treated in or during with the same procedure by combined transcatheter techniques (balloon valvuloplasty and fistula occlusion) before ASD occlusion. Group II (n = 9) had multiple defects (cribiform or two separate holes). They were treated with a single device in five instances and with two separate devices in four cases. Group III (n = 14) had large (32+/-3 mm) single defects. Nine of them underwent successful implantation using a device 33+/-3 mm in diameter; in the remaining five patients the device was removed because of instability. Group IV (n = 3) had residual defects after previous partial device occlusion. All three defects were successfully occluded with a second device. No movement or interference with the first device was observed. Group V (n = 6) had severe pulmonary hypertension (86+/-16 mm Hg). Immediately after ASD occlusion we observed significant relief in these patients (67+/-14 mm Hg; P<0.01). There were no major complications; all 23 patients with successful implants were discharged without symptoms 2-7 days later; one patient with atrial fibrillation recovered sinus rhythm. The follow-up (8+/-5 mo) Doppler echo study showed complete ASD occlusion in 22 patients and a peak pulmonary pressure of 30+/-14 mm Hg. We conclude that transcatheter occlusion of ASDs is an effective and safe treatment for patients with complex anatomic or physiopathologic conditions, as evaluated by short-term follow-up.

Comparison of the Sideris and Amplatzer septal occlusion devices

The results of transcatheter atrial septal defect (ASD) occlusion with 2 different devices (Sideris adjustable buttoned device vs Amplatzer Septal Occluder) were compared in 2 consecutive series of patients. Comparative outcomes were assessed by whether a device was implanted or not, by complications and fluoroscopy time of implantation, and by the incidence of residual shunting on transthoracic echocardiography at follow-up. The patient and defect characteristics were similar in both groups. Twenty-eight of 33 Sideris devices and 37 of 39 Amplatzer devices were implanted. The fluoroscopy time for the Amplatzer implants was 13.4 minutes (range 8 to 41) compared with 23.7 minutes (range 11 to 60.6) for the Sideris implants (p <0.001). The complete occlusion rate for the Amplatzer device was 93% compared with 44% for the Sideris device at 1 year (p <0.001). In conclusion, the Amplatzer device produces higher occlusion rates of ASDs with shorter fluoroscopy times.

Intermediate-term results of Phase I Food and Drug Administration Trials of buttoned device occlusion of secundum atrial septal defects

OBJECTIVES

This study was conducted to evaluate the intermediate-term results of the multi-institutional U.S. trial of the buttoned device for transcatheter closure of atrial septal defects (ASDs).

BACKGROUND

The trial was conducted in three centers (University of Arizona, University of Michigan and University of Wisconsin) under a Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved clinical trial with investigational device exemption. Only short-term follow-up is known.

METHODS

All 46 patients who had successful implantation of the device were prospectively followed up. Patients were evaluated at 1, 6 and 12 months after device occlusion and yearly thereafter.

RESULTS

This cohort was followed up from 51 to 68 months (mean 60.8, median 62). Patient ages ranged from 1 to 62 years (median 4); weights ranged from 10 to 105 kg (median 18); and stretched ASD sizes were 14 +/- 4 mm (left to right shunts) and 10 +/- 3 mm (right to left shunts). Of the 46 patients, 45 (98%) had effective occlusion of their ASD, and 34 (74%) had complete ASD closure. The incidence of residual shunts decreased from 65% (30 of 46 patients) at 1 month after device placement to 27% (12 of 45 patients) at last follow-up. All residual shunts were quantitated as trivial. Only two patients (4%) required reintervention for significant residual defects. There were no cases of endocarditis or thromboembolism in 224 patient-years of follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

In up to 5.5 years of follow-up, the buttoned device provided effective closure in 98% of patients in whom the device was successfully implanted. The incidence of residual shunts decreased during follow-up, and no instances of endocarditis or thromboembolism were observed.