Use of statins prior to percutaneous coronary intervention reduces myonecrosis and improves clinical outcome

Reduction of No Reflow with a Loading Dose of Atorvastatin before Primary Angioplasty in Patients with Acute ST Myocardial Infarction

BACKGROUND

No reflow defined as an altered myocardial reperfusion and failure at microvascular level is a frequent complication in acute myocardial infarction that attenuates beneficial effect of reperfusion therapy leading to poor outcomes. There is not enough evidence to support that previous use of statins improves coronary flow in patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).

AIM OF STUDY

To determine if a loading dose of 80 mg of atorvastatin before primary angioplasty reduces the frequency of no reflow, hs-CRP, IL6 intracoronary levels, and major combined cardiovascular events at 30 d.

METHODS

In this controlled clinical trial, we randomly assigned 103 adult patients within the 12 h of acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) to receive 80 mg of atorvastatin additional to standard treatment (AST) before performing primary PCI versus standard treatment (ST) alone. The primary outcomes were the occurrence of no reflow and high sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) and interleukin 6 levels and secondary outcomes were major adverse cardiovascular events at 30 d.

RESULTS

103 patients were analyzed, 49 (48%) received AST, 54 (52%) ST. Frequency of no reflow among groups was 27 vs. 63% respectively, p ≤0.0001. hs-CRP level was 2.69 mg/dL for AST vs. 2.2 mg/dL in ST, meanwhile IL-6 levels were 5.2 pg/mL vs. 6.35 pg/mL respectively, p = ns. Cox regression model demonstrated that the treatment assigned is an independent predictor for no reflow occurrence (HR 0.34 95%, CI 0.18-0.61, p ≤0.001).

CONCLUSION

The administration of a loading dose of 80 mg atorvastatin before primary PCI is an effective strategy for prevention of no reflow improving also clinical outcomes and free survival rate for the presentation of major adverse cardiovascular events at 30 d.

Preprocedural statin therapy, inflammation, and myocardial injury in low-risk stable coronary artery disease patients submitted to coronary stent implantation

OBJECTIVE

Evaluate if statin therapy prior to elective coronary stent implantation (CSI) reduces the plasma levels of markers of inflammation and of myocardial necrosis in low-risk stable coronary artery disease patients (CAD).

BACKGROUND

The elevation of markers of inflammation and of myocardial necrosis after percutaneous coronary intervention may interfere with clinical outcome. Among acute coronary syndrome patients, statins improve clinical outcomes when used before CSI-mostly due to reduction of CSI-related myocardial infarction. However, little is known concerning preprocedural statin therapy on the reduction of these markers in stable patients at low-risk.

METHODS

In this prospective, observational study, 100 patients (n = 50 on statin therapy vs. n = 50 not on statin) with stable coronary artery disease underwent elective CSI. Inflammatory (C-reactive protein [CRP], interleukin [IL]-6, tumor necrosis factor-α and matrix metalloproteinase-9) and myocardial necrosis markers (troponin I and CK-MB) were determined before and 24 hr after CSI.

RESULTS

All patients presented a significant increase of CRP and IL-6 after CSI. However, this increase was attenuated in patients on statin therapy prior to CSI than those without statin therapy: 75% vs. 150% (P < 0.001) and 192% vs. 300% (P < 0.01). The other pro-inflammatory markers were similar for both sets of patients. Troponin I and CK-MB did not change after CSI regardless of previous statin therapy or not.

CONCLUSIONS

Pretreatment with statin attenuates procedural inflammation, denoted by markedly lower increases of CRP and IL-6 levels, in elective CSI within low-risk stable CAD patients. Periprocedural myocardial injury was irrelevant and was not affected by preprocedural statin therapy in this population.

Effects of atorvastatin loading prior to primary percutaneous coronary intervention on endothelial function and inflammatory factors in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction

Previous studies have demonstrated the beneficial effect of statin loading prior to elective and early percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), in which the 'pleiotropic effects' of statins may contribute to these clinical benefits. The aim of the present study was to examine the potential effects of atorvastatin loading prior to primary PCI on coronary endothelial function and inflammatory factors in patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). A total of 60 patients with STEMI were randomized into three groups: Loading dose (80 mg atorvastatin prior to PCI; n=20), regular dose (20 mg atorvastatin prior to PCI; n=20) and control (without atorvastatin prior to PCI; n=20). The plasma samples were collected prior to, and immediately, 6 and 24 h after PCI in all the patients. The plasma concentrations of endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS), nitric oxide (NO), interleukin-6 (IL-6), tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) and intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM-1) were examined using ELISA. The plasma eNOS levels immediately and 24 h after PCI were significantly higher in the regular dose group compared with the other groups. However, there were no significant differences in the plasma eNOS concentration prior to and 6 h after PCI, or in the plasma NO concentration at any of the time-points among the three groups. The plasma IL-6 levels prior to PCI were significantly lower in the loading dose group compared with the other groups; however, there were no significant differences in the plasma concentration of IL-6 following PCI or in the concentrations of TNF-α and ICAM-1 at any of the time-points among the three groups. In conclusion, atorvastatin loading in patients with STEMI undergoing primary PCI may not have protective effects on endothelial function and the inflammatory reaction.

Protective role of statins in patients with acute coronary syndrome aged ≥ 75 years with low LDL-C who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention

The effect of statins in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) at advanced age with lower low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) remains unknown. We evaluated the effect of statins in 220 Chinese patients with ACS aged ≥ 75 years with low LDL-C undergoing PCI. Biomarkers were measured before and 6 hours after PCI, and patients were followed up for 1 year. Biomarkers in the statin group at 6 hours post-PCI were lower than controls (creatine kinase-myocardial band 14.2 ± 5.78 vs 47.3 ± 16.4 IU/L, P = .03; cardiac troponin I 0.36 ± 0.12 vs 1.33 ± 0.47 ng/mL, P = .01; and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein 7.6 ± 4.3 vs 13.6 ± 4.5 mg/L, P = .001, respectively). Significant differences were found in major adverse cardiac events at 1 year (P = .02-.01), while target lesion revascularization alone was less at 3 months between the 2 groups (P = .03). This study demonstrates that elderly patients with ACS having low LDL-C benefit from statins regardless of type, dosage, and duration of statin administration prior to PCI.

Effect of statin pretreatment on myocardial perfusion in patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

To achieve sufficient myocardial perfusion in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients receiving primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI), many adjunctive therapies have been proposed. Previous trials have reported variances in myocardial perfusion improvement for statin pretreatment, which made it inconvincible to confirm the beneficial effects of statins. Therefore, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine whether statin pretreatment was effective in improving myocardial perfusion.

HYPOTHESIS

Statin pretreatment could improve myocardial perfusion in STEMI patients undergoing PPCI.

METHODS

We searched the PubMed, Web of Knowledge, and the Cochrane Library databases for studies evaluating the impact of statin pretreatment on myocardial perfusion in STEMI patients receiving PPCI.

RESULTS

Twelve trials were finally included in our meta-analysis. There were no significant differences in patients' baseline characteristics between the statin pretreatment and control groups. Overall pooled analysis showed that patients in the statin pretreatment groups had significantly better epicardial coronary blood flow (measured by Thrombosis in Myocardial Infarction [TIMI] grade, odds ratio [OR]: 0.49, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.28 to 0.84; measured by corrected TIMI frame count, mean difference: -5.63; 95% CI: -9.66 to -1.6). A trend toward myocardial tissue level perfusion improvement was seen in the statin pretreatment arm rather than the control arm (measured by myocardial blush grade, OR: 0.74; 95% CI: 0.50 to 1.09).

CONCLUSIONS

This present meta-analysis suggests that statin pretreatment might be effective in improving myocardial perfusion in STEMI patients.

Statin treatment before percutaneous cononary intervention

Treatment with 3-hydroxy-3-methyl glutaryl coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase inhibitors (statins) improves short-and-long term prognosis in high-risk patients with stable coronary artery disease and in those with acute coronary syndrome and their use is strongly recommended for secondary prevention. Moreover, recent data suggest that statin pre-treatment is associated with a better short- and long-term outcome in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. Current guidelines for coronary revascularization recommend the use of high-dose of statins before percutaneous coronary intervention to reduce the risk of periprocedural myocardial infarction in statin naïve patients (class IIa A) and in those on chronic statin therapy (class IIa B). However, the beneficial clinical effects elicited by statins in patients undergoing coronary angioplasty may arise not only from a cardiac protection against periprocedural myocardial injury but also from a renal protection against acute kidney injury caused by iodinated contrast media. Actually, statins exert multiple non-lipid lowering (pleiotropic) effects, including improved endothelial function, reduced inflammatory and immuno-modulatory processes, oxidative stress and platelet adhesion, that may contribute to both cardio- and nephro-protection even in the short-term.

Oxidative stress and pathological changes after coronary artery interventions

Oxidative stress greatly influences the pathogenesis of various cardiovascular disorders. Coronary interventions, including balloon angioplasty and coronary stent implantation, are associated with increased vascular levels of reactive oxygen species in conjunction with altered endothelial cell and smooth muscle cell function. These alterations potentially lead to restenosis, thrombosis, or endothelial dysfunction in the treated artery. Therefore, the understanding of the pathophysiological role of reactive oxygen species (ROS) generated during or after coronary interventions, or both, is essential to improve the success rate of these procedures. Superoxide O2(·-) anions, whether derived from uncoupled endothelial nitric oxide synthase, nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate oxidase, xanthine oxidase, or mitochondria, are among the most harmful ROS. O2(·-) can scavenge nitric oxide, modify proteins and nucleotides, and induce proinflammatory signaling, which may lead to greater ROS production. Current innovations in stent technologies, including biodegradable stents, nitric oxide donor-coated stents, and a new generation of drug-eluting stents, therefore address persistent oxidative stress and reduced nitric oxide bioavailability after percutaneous coronary interventions. This review discusses the molecular mechanisms of ROS generation after coronary interventions, the related pathological events-including restenosis, endothelial dysfunction, and stent thrombosis-and possible therapeutic ways forward.

Impact of low levels of vascular endothelial growth factor after myocardial infarction on 6-month clinical outcome. Results from the Nagoya Acute Myocardial Infarction Study

BACKGROUND

Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) is induced by myocardial ischemia and is thought to facilitate cardiovascular repair after acute myocardial infarction (AMI). However, the association between the plasma VEGF levels and clinical outcome in AMI patients is unclear.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We evaluated 879 AMI patients undergoing successful primary revascularization within 24h of symptom onset. The patients were classified into 3 groups according to tertiles of plasma VEGF levels at 7 days after the onset of AMI. Major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCE), defined as cardiac death, recurrent acute coronary syndrome, hospital readmission for heart failure, or stroke, were assessed during the 6-month follow-up period. The incidence of MACCE was the least frequent in the middle tertile. Compared to the middle tertile, patients in the low tertile were at a significantly higher risk for MACCE even after adjusting for baseline characteristics (hazard ratio [HR] 2.67, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.18-6.06, P=0.019). An absence of statin treatment before onset and a younger age (HR 0.54, 0.87; 95%CI 0.33-0.90, 0.76-0.99; P=0.017, 0.037; respectively) were significantly associated with low VEGF.

CONCLUSIONS

Low plasma VEGF levels at 7 days after the onset of AMI were associated with a significantly increased risk for MACCE during 6 months of follow-up.

Do statins have a role in reduction/prevention of post-PCI restenosis?

The pathophysiology of post-PCI restenosis involves neointimal formation that consists of three phases: thrombosis (within 24 h), recruitment (3-8 days), and proliferation, which starts on day 8 of PCI. Various factors suggested to be predictors/risks for restenosis include C-reactive protein (CRP), inflammatory mediators (cytokines and adhesion molecules), oxygen radicals, advanced glycation end products (AGEs) and their receptors (RAGE), and soluble RAGE (sRAGE). The earlier noted factors produce thrombogenesis, vascular smooth muscle cell proliferation, and extracellular matrix formation. Statins have pleiotropic effects. Besides lowering serum cholesterol, they have various other biological effects including antiinflammatory, antithrombotic, CRP-lowering, antioxidant, antimitotic, and inhibition of smooth muscle cell proliferation. They inhibit matrix metalloproteinase and cyclooxygenase-2, lower AGEs, decrease expression of RAGE and increase levels of serum sRAGE. They also increase the synthesis of nitric oxide (NO) by increasing endothelial NO synthase expression and activity. Preprocedural statin therapy is known to reduce peri- and post-PCI myonecrosis and reduce the need for repeat revascularization. There is evidence that statin-eluting stents inhibit in-stent restenosis in animal models. It is concluded that because of the above attributes of statins, they are suitable candidates for reduction of post-PCI restenosis and post-PCI myonecrosis. The future directions for the use of statins in reduction of post-PCI restenosis and myonecrosis have been discussed.

Effect of previous statin therapy in patients with acute coronary syndrome and percutaneous coronary intervention

Background and Objectives

Statin therapy after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has been associated with reduced major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE). However, it has been less clear as to whether statin therapy before acute coronary syndrome (ACS) is beneficial. We studied the effect of previous statin therapy, initiated ≥1 month before PCI, on the outcome of patients with ACS who had undergone early invasive strategies.

Subjects and Methods

We stratified 479 consecutive patients with ACS who had undergone PCI, according to preprocedural statin administration as follows: previous statin-treated patients (statin group, n=237) and statin-naive patients (control group, n=242). The incidence of periprocedural myocardial infarction (MI) and in-hospital MACE was assessed.

Results

The incidence of Braunwald class III angina and MI presentation were significantly lower in the statin group than in the control group. Angiographic and procedural characteristics were similar between the two groups; however, slow/no reflow phenomenon occurred more frequently in the control group. After PCI, the incidence of periprocedural MI was higher in the control group than in the statin group (6.6% vs. 2.1%, p=0.016). Multivariate analysis revealed that no prior use of statin {odds ratio (OR)=2.8; 95% confidence interval (CI)=1.1-7.2; p=0.038), procedural complication (OR=4.0; 95% CI=1.5-10.5; p=0.004), stent overlap (OR=4.7; 95% CI=1.3-16.4; p=0.015), and old age (OR=3.2; 95% CI=1.2-8.0; p=0.016) were independent predictors for in-hospital MACE.

Conclusion

Previous statin therapy before ACS was associated with milder clinical presentation and lower incidence of in-hospital MACE after early invasive strategies. The beneficial outcome is attributable to a significant reduction in periprocedural MI after PCI.

Statins: cardiovascular risk reduction in percutaneous coronary intervention-basic and clinical evidence of hyperacute use of statins

Reduction of LDL-cholesterol concentration in serum, blocking the isoprenylation of GTPases and the activation of myocyte-protective enzyme systems are three mechanisms that currently explain the lipid and non-lipid effects of statins. However, the decrease of LDL-cholesterol, the reduction of inflammation biomarkers and even the atheroregresion, as surrogate effects to the mechanisms of action of statins would be irrelevant if not accompanied by a significant decrease in the incidence of cardiovascular events. Statins like no other pharmacological group have proven to reduce the incidence of cardiovascular events and prolong life in any clinical scenario. This article review the basic and clinical evidence that support a new indication for HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors "pharmacological myocardial preconditioning before anticipated ischemia" or hyperacute use of statins in subjects with any coronary syndrome eligible for elective, semi-urgent or primary percutaneous coronary intervention: ARMYDA-Original, NAPLES I-II, ARMYDA-ACS, ARMYDA-RECAPTURE, Non-STEMI-Korean, Korean-STEMI trials.

Statin loading before percutaneous coronary intervention: proposed mechanisms and applications

Statin therapy reduces the risk of cardiovascular events in patients with coronary artery disease. Recent in vitro and in vivo studies demonstrated a LDL-independent action of these class of drugs, which appears in modulating endothelial function, inflammation and thrombosis. Periprocedural myocardial infarction and contrast-induced nephropathy after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), associated with worse outcome on long-term follow-up, are both complications related to inflammatory pathogenetic mechanisms. Randomized studies demonstrated a beneficial effect of short-term statin pretreatment in reducing periprocedural cardiac marker release in patients undergoing PCI. Statin therapy before elective PCI reduces periprocedural myocardial infarction in patients with stable angina. Furthermore, an acute loading with a high dose of atorvastatin prevents myocardial damage in patients with acute coronary syndromes undergoing early PCI (<48 h). In patients already on chronic statin therapy, a reload with high-dose statins was associated with a significant improvement on 30-day major adverse cardiac event rates. Furthermore, statin therapy at the time of PCI significantly decreased the incidence of contrast-induced nephropathy. This evidence suggests an ‘upstream administration’ of short-term, high-dose statins in all patients undergoing PCI.

Efficacy of high-dose atorvastatin loading before primary percutaneous coronary intervention in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: the STATIN STEMI trial

OBJECTIVES

This study sought to determine the efficacy of high-dose atorvastatin in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).

BACKGROUND

Previous randomized trials have demonstrated that statin pre-treatment reduced major adverse cardiac events (MACEs) in patients with stable angina pectoris and acute coronary syndrome. However, no randomized studies have been carried out with STEMI patients in a primary PCI setting.

METHODS

A total 171 patients with STEMI were randomized to 80-mg atorvastatin (n = 86) or 10-mg atorvastatin (n = 85) arms for pre-treatment before PCI. All patients were prescribed clopidogrel (600 mg) before PCI. After PCI, both groups were treated with atorvastatin (10 mg). The primary end point was 30-day incidence of MACE including death, nonfatal MI, and target vessel revascularization. Secondary end points included corrected thrombolysis in myocardial infarction frame count, myocardial blush grade, and ST-segment resolution at 90 min after PCI.

RESULTS

MACE occurred in 5 (5.8%) and 9 (10.6%) patients in the 80-mg and 10-mg atorvastatin pre-treatment arms, respectively (p = 0.26). Corrected thrombolysis in myocardial infarction frame count was lower in the 80-mg atorvastatin arm (26.9 +/- 12.3 vs. 34.1 +/- 19.0, p = 0.01). Myocardial blush grade and ST-segment resolution were also higher in the 80-mg atorvastatin arm (2.2 +/- 0.8 vs. 1.9 +/- 0.8, p = 0.02 and 61.8 +/- 26.2 vs. 50.6 +/- 25.8%, p = 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

High-dose atorvastatin pre-treatment before PCI did not show a significant reduction of MACEs compared with low-dose atorvastatin but did show improved immediate coronary flow after primary PCI. High-dose atorvastatin may produce an optimal result for STEMI patients undergoing PCI by improving microvascular myocardial perfusion. (Efficacy of High-Dose AtorvaSTATIN Loading Before Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction [STATIN STEMI]; NCT00808717).

Effect of statins pretreatment on periprocedural myocardial infarction in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Periprocedural myocardial injury remains the most common complication associated with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Previous studies have demonstrated that even a small elevation of cardiac enzymes is associated with higher risk of mortality during follow-up.

OBJECTIVE

We performed a meta-analysis based on all currently available randomized controlled trials (RCT) to evaluate the beneficial effects of hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA reductase inhibitors (statins) given before PCI on preventing periprocedural myocardial infarction (MI).

METHODS

The published literature was scanned by formal searches of electronic databases (PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials) and conference proceedings up through August 2009. RCTs were eligible for inclusion if they compared preprocedural statins versus placebo treatment in patients not taking statins previously but scheduled for PCI and had the data of periprocedural MI reported by the trial investigators.

RESULTS

Prespecified criteria were met by 6 RCTs involving 2,088 patients. During the periprocedural period, 81 of 1,051 patients (7.7%) in the statins pretreatment group developed periprocedural MI, significantly less than 147 of 1,037 (14.2%) patients assigned to the control group (OR 0.51, 95% CI 0.38-0.67; P< 0.001). During 1-month follow-up, only 4 deaths, 7 non-periprocedural Q-wave MIs, and 4 revascularizations occurred in all 2,088 enrolled patients. The composite of death, MI, or target vessel revascularization at 1 month, essentially driven by periprocedural MI, was reported in 8.0% in the statins pretreatment group and 15.3% in the control group (OR 0.48, 95% CI 0.36-0.64; P< 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

This meta-analysis supports the effectiveness of statins pretreatment on reducing the rate of periprocedural MI in patients undergoing PCI.

Coronary microembolization: from bedside to bench and back to bedside

Coronary microembolization from the erosion or rupture of a vulnerable atherosclerotic plaque occurs spontaneously in acute coronary syndromes and iatrogenically during percutaneous coronary interventions. Typical consequences of coronary microembolization are microinfarcts with an inflammatory response, contractile dysfunction, and reduced coronary reserve. Apart from transient elevations of creatine kinase and troponin, microemboli can be visualized by intracoronary Doppler and the resulting microinfarcts by late-enhancement nuclear magnetic resonance. Statins, antiplatelet agents, and coronary vasodilators protect against microembolization and microinfarction when started before percutaneous coronary interventions. Distal protection devices can retrieve atherothrombotic debris and prevent its embolization into the microcirculation, but their effect on clinical outcome has been disappointing so far, except for saphenous vein bypass grafts. Devices for aspiration of thrombi and thrombus-derived vasoconstrictor, thrombogenic, and inflammatory substances, however, reduce thrombus burden, improve perfusion, and provide protection in patients with acute myocardial infarction.

Effect of two-day atorvastatin pretreatment on the incidence of periprocedural myocardial infarction following elective percutaneous coronary intervention: a single-center, prospective, and randomized study

Both randomized and observational studies have suggested that pretreatment with statins may reduce the incidence of periprocedural myocardial infarction (PMI) in patients with stable angina during elective percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). The purpose of this randomized study (Clinical Trial Registration No. NCT00469326) was to investigate the effect of 2-day atorvastatin therapy on the incidence of PMI in patients with stable angina pectoris undergoing elective PCI. A total of 200 patients with stable angina pectoris who were not taking statins and who had been referred for PCI were enrolled and randomized (ratio 1:1) to a 2-day pretreatment regimen with atorvastatin 80 mg/day and subsequent PCI or immediate PCI. The serum concentration of creatine kinase-MB mass and troponin I were measured before and 16 to 24 hours after PCI. The incidence of PMI was assessed using established criteria. Of the patients, 10% in the atorvastatin group and 12% in the control group had a postprocedural creatine kinase-MB mass elevation > or =3 times the upper limit of normal (p = 0.65). The incidence of PMI as determined by the postinterventional release of troponin I > or =3 times the upper limit of normal was 17% in the atorvastatin group and 16% in the control group (p = 0.85). The median creatine kinase-MB mass peak after PCI was 1.46 ng/ml (interquartile range 0.83 to 2.52) in the atorvastatin group and 1.40 ng/ml (interquartile range 0.90 to 2.54) in the control group (p = 0.70). The median peak troponin I level after PCI was 0.100 ng/ml (0.096 to 0.385) in the atorvastatin group and 0.100 ng/ml (0.60 to 0.262) in the control group (p = 0.54). On multivariate analysis, the only independent predictor of PMI was patient age (odds ratio 1.09, 95% confidence interval 1.025 to 1.159, p = 0.006). In conclusion, in the present study 2-day pre-PCI therapy with atorvastatin did not reduce the occurrence of PMI in patients with stable angina pectoris undergoing elective PCI.

[Statin in prevention of periprocedural myonecrosis after percutaneous coronary angioplasty: systematic review and meta-analysis]

Postprocedural myocardial necrosis as indicated by biomarkers increase is frequent after percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) in up to 40% of cases. Pretreatment by statin could reduce the occurrence of those periprocedural myonecrosis. Medline and Cochrane Database screenings allow us to select articles published until March 2007. Sixteen prospective and retrospective studies have been identified in relation with the impact of statin pretreatment on periprocedural myonecrosis or morbimortality outcomes in patients who underwent PCI. Among selected studies, 12 provide the rate of periprocedural myocardial infarction. The relative risk (RR) of periprocedural myocardial necrosis in patients pretreated with statin was 0.50 (95% CI: 0.40-0.63). Among the 5409 patients with clinical follow-up ensured until six months, the RR of death in patients pretreated with statin before the PCI was 0.64 (95% CI: 0.44-0.93). Significant heterogeneity was observed in the results. In sensitivity analysis, stable and unstable patients were compared with similar RR reduction of periprocedural myonecrosis in favour of patients receiving statin before PCI. In the present meta-analysis, we confirm that statin pretreatment before PCI is able to reduce periprocedural myonecrosis and suggest a potential impact on six months survival of patients.

Review: Percutaneous coronary interventions and statins therapy

Statins exert a number of beneficial effects on endothelial function and atherosclerotic plaque, modulating oxidative stress and inflammation, with subsequent, well documented, primary and secondary prevention of coronary artery disease. Periprocedural myocardial infarction and contrast induced nephropathy, after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), are associated with a worse outcome on long term follow-up. In the ARMYDA study, pretreatment with statins before elective PCI reduces periprocedural myocardial infarction in patients with stable angina. Moreover, the ARMYDA ACS was the first randomized, prospective trial that demonstrated that an acute loading with a high dose of atorvastatin prevents myocardial damage in patients with unstable syndromes undergoing early ( <48 hours) coronary angiography and consequent angioplasty. Statins could also have beneficial effects by reducing expression of adhesion molecules in endothelial cells (ICAM-1 and E-Selectin) as demonstrated in the ARMYDA-CAMS study. Furthermore, patients receiving statins at the time of procedure show a significantly reduced incidence of contrast-induced nephropathy. All this evidence may strongly influence the clinical practice of an interventional cardiologist.

Effect of statin therapy before Q-wave myocardial infarction on myocardial perfusion

Recent studies emphasized the non-lipid-lowering effects of hydroxymethylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitors on endothelial function, inflammation, and platelet activation in patients with stable atherosclerosis. This study sought to evaluate the impact of statin pretreatment in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) on level of systemic inflammation and myocardial perfusion. A total of 253 consecutive patients undergoing primary angioplasty on a native vessel within 12 hours of AMI were divided into a group with statin pretreatment (n = 86) and control patients (n = 167). Angiographic myocardial blush grade (MBG) after revascularization of the infarct-related artery was determined to evaluate myocardial perfusion. Statin pretreatment was associated with a lower frequency of increased C-reactive protein (>or=5 mg/L) on admission compared with the control group (48% vs 64%; p = 0.019). The frequency of normal perfusion (MBG 3) was higher in the statin-pretreatment group than the control group (45% vs 26%, respectively; p <0.001). Statin pretreatment was an independent predictor of normal myocardial perfusion (MBG 3; odds ratio 2.53, 95% confidence interval 1.15 to 9.53, p = 0.022) in addition to age <or=70 years and C-reactive protein <5 mg/L. In conclusion, statin pretreatment in patients with AMI was associated with decreased systemic inflammation and better perfusion after primary angioplasty of the infarct-related artery.

Meta-analysis of published reports on the effect of statin treatment before percutaneous coronary intervention on periprocedural myonecrosis

Myonecrosis, manifested by an increase in cardiac markers, may occur in up to 50% of patients undergoing elective percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). The degree of periprocedural myonecrosis, measured by the peak creatine kinase-MB fraction, has been associated with incidence of adverse clinical outcomes. Therefore, strategies to decrease myonecrosis may translate into a decrease in mortality. We evaluated the efficacy of statin pretreatment in decreasing the incidence of myonecrosis after PCI on the basis of results of published studies. A systematic search of the PubMed database from its inception to October 2006 and from the references of identified studies was performed. Only studies with concurrent control groups were included. Information on baseline characteristics of included patients and clinical outcomes was independently extracted by 2 investigators. A random effects model was used to pool odds ratios of the incidence of periprocedural myonecrosis in statin-treated patients versus controls. A total of 9 trials was included in the analysis, 2 randomized trials (n = 604) and 7 retrospective cohort studies (n = 4,751), which assessed the impact of statin pretreatment on periprocedural myonecrosis. During this period, 196 of 2,149 patients (9%) in the statin-treated group compared with 455 of 2,602 (17.5%) in the control group (odds ratio 0.45, 95% confidence interval 0.33 to 0.62, p <0.01) developed myonecrosis. In conclusion, based on existing evidence, routine pretreatment with statins may decrease the risk of postprocedure myonecrosis. Large randomized controlled trials addressing the dose, duration, and type of statin on periprocedural myonecrosis are necessary before recommending routine use of statins to prevent myonecrosis in the elective PCI setting.

Pretreatment with statins may reduce cardiovascular morbidity and mortality after elective surgery and percutaneous coronary intervention: clinical evidence and possible underlying mechanisms

After Murry et al (Circulation 1986;74:1124) described ischemic preconditioning in 1986, numerous pharmacologic agents with effects simulating ischemic preconditioning have been identified. With the exception of beta-blockers, most such agents have no proven clinical benefit in the setting of myocardial ischemia. The 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitors (statins) have been consistently demonstrated to reduce myocardial injury, morbidity, and mortality in the clinical setting, both perioperatively and after percutaneous coronary intervention. Although the precise mechanism underlying their additional protective effect is not yet fully understood, it appears to be immediate in action and independent of cholesterol lowering. Experimental data from several animal models of ischemia and reperfusion have demonstrated an infarct size reduction with prior statin administration. At the cellular level, statins activate the phosphoinositol-3 kinase and Akt signaling cascade. Statins also increase expression and activity of endothelial nitric oxide synthase, inducible nitric oxide synthase, ecto-5'-nucleotidase, cyclooxygenase-2, and other prostaglandin synthesis pathway enzymes. However, when given by oral route to animals, relatively high dose of statins is needed to exert maximal protective effect. Understanding the underlying mechanism may enable to maximize the protective effect by using drug combination with synergistic activity and to avoid medications that may interfere with the protective effect of statins (ie, selective and nonselective cyclooxygenase-2 inhibition). Future clinical applications include preoperative and periprocedural risk reduction.

Does pravastatin therapy affect cardiac enzyme levels after percutaneous coronary intervention?

Serum cardiac enzyme elevation after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), a relatively common complication, is a prognostic determinant of long-term outcome in patients who undergo these procedures. Statins are postulated to reduce such complications. This study investigated the short-term effects of pravastatin on serum creatine kinase myocardial isoform (CK-MB) and serum cardiac troponin I (cTpI) levels after elective PCI. Of 93 patients studied, 72 (77.4%) were men, and 21 (22.6%) were women (mean age, 58.9+/-11.0 y). Patients were randomly divided into 3 groups before they underwent elective PCI. Preoperatively, group 1 patients (n=30) received pravastatin 10 mg/d, and group 2 patients (n=29) received pravastatin 40 mg/d. Control group patients (n=34) received no lipid-lowering medication. Serum CK-MB and serum cTpI levels were measured preoperatively and then again at 6, 24, and 36 h postoperatively. Demographic features of patients and characteristics of the PCI procedure, including number of vessels/lesions and duration and number of inflations, did not differ among groups (P>.05). Mean serum CK-MB and serum cTpI levels were significantly increased after PCI in all patients (P<.001). When compared with control group patients, those given pravastatin did not experience significantly lowered postprocedural serum CK-MB or serum cTpI levels (P>.05). Preprocedural pravastatin therapy at dosages of 10 mg/d and 40 mg/d seems inadequate for preventing serum cardiac enzyme elevations during short-term follow-up after PCI. Additional research on this topic is recommended.

Atorvastatin Pretreatment Improves Outcomes in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndromes Undergoing Early Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

OBJECTIVES

This study sought to investigate potential protective effects of atorvastatin in patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).

BACKGROUND

Randomized studies have shown that pretreatment with atorvastatin may reduce periprocedural myocardial infarction in patients with stable angina during elective PCI; however, this therapy has not been tested in patients with ACS.

METHODS

A total of 171 patients with non-ST-segment elevation ACS were randomized to pretreatment with atorvastatin (80 mg 12 h before PCI, with a further 40-mg preprocedure dose [n = 86]) or placebo (n = 85). All patients were given a clopidogrel 600-mg loading dose. All patients received long-term atorvastatin treatment thereafter (40 mg/day). The main end point of the trial was a 30-day incidence of major adverse cardiac events (death, myocardial infarction, or unplanned revascularization).

RESULTS

The primary end point occurred in 5% of patients in the atorvastatin arm and in 17% of those in the placebo arm (p = 0.01); this difference was mostly driven by reduction of myocardial infarction incidence (5% vs. 15%; p = 0.04). Postprocedural elevation of creatine kinase-MB and troponin-I was also significantly lower in the atorvastatin group (7% vs. 27%, p = 0.001 and 41% vs. 58%, p = 0.039, respectively). At multivariable analysis, pretreatment with atorvastatin conferred an 88% risk reduction of 30-day major adverse cardiac events (odds ratio 0.12, 95% confidence interval 0.05 to 0.50; p = 0.004).

CONCLUSIONS

The ARMYDA-ACS trial indicates that even short-term pretreatment with atorvastatin may improve outcomes in patients with ACS undergoing early invasive strategy. These findings may support routine use of high-dose statins before intervention in patients with ACS.

Relation of preprocedural statin therapy to in-hospital procedural complications following percutaneous coronary interventions in patients with hyperlipidemia

We investigated whether the observed protective effect of hyperlipidemia is stronger in patients who take statins and, if so, whether that effect is likely due to patient characteristics associated with statin use. In-hospital complications and long-term outcomes of patients with hyperlipidemia (cholesterol level > or = 240 mg/dl) undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) on statins (group Ia, n = 2,052) and not on statins (group Ib, n = 1,650) were compared with 726 patients with lower cholesterol levels (group II). Despite a higher prevalence of co-morbidities and worse angiographic characteristics in patients with hyperlipidemia, patients in group Ia had significantly lower in-hospital mortality (0% vs 2% in the other 2 groups, p < 0.001), a lower increase in the postprocedure creatine kinase-MB fraction (14% vs 27% in group Ib and 28% in group II, p < 0.001), and fewer PCI complications (15% vs 30% in groups Ib and II, p < 0.001). After adjustment, patients in group Ia had a significant decrease in complications (odds ratio 0.72, 95% confidence interval 0.65 to 0.92, p = 0.009). In contrast, those in group Ib had outcomes similar to those of patients with lower cholesterol. After application of propensity analysis to adjust for the likelihood of receiving statins based on clinical, angiographic, and procedural characteristics, group Ia had fewer in-hospital complications (odds ratio 0.75, 95% confidence interval 0.62 to 0.90, p = 0.002) and lower in-hospital mortality (odds ratio 0.32, 95% confidence interval 0.12 to 0.84, p = 0.021). After successful PCI, overall survival after dismissal and survival free of myocardial infarction and target vessel revascularization were similar. In conclusion, hyperlipidemia per se is not associated with lower in-hospital complications after PCI. The benefit is largely limited to patients on statin treatment.

Peri-procedural myocardial injury: 2005 update

During the past three decades, percutaneous coronary intervention has become one of the cardinal treatment strategies for stenotic coronary artery disease. Technical advances, including the introduction of new devices such as stents, have expanded the interventional capabilities of balloon angioplasty. At the same time, there has been a decline in the rate of major adverse cardiac events, including Q-wave acute myocardial infarction, emergency coronary artery bypass grafting, and cardiac death. Despite these advances, the incidence of post-procedural cardiac marker elevation has not substantially decreased since the first serial assessment 20 years ago. As of now, these post-procedural cardiac marker elevations are considered to represent peri-procedural myocardial injury (PMI) with worse long-term outcome potential. Recent progress has been made for the identification of two main PMI patterns, one near the intervention site (proximal type, PMI type I) and one in the distal perfusion territory of the treated coronary artery (distal type, PMI type II) as well as for preventive strategies. Integrating these new developments into the wealth of clinical information on this topic, this review aims at giving a current perspective on the entity of PMI.

Percutaneous coronary interventions for coronary artery disease: the long and short of optimizing medical therapy

Atherosclerosis is a dynamic process and timely introduction of pharmacological treatment can have a significant bearing on the patient's health and outcome. In addition to treating the culprit lesion mechanically, admission for percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) for coronary artery disease (CAD) gives an opportunity for the interventional cardiologist to optimize medical therapy. The aim of this review is to provide an overview of the current medical literature pertaining to cardiovascular (CV) risk reduction and vascular event prevention in the setting of PCI, with emphasis on antiplatelet therapies, beta-blockers, HMG-Co A reductase inhibitors (statins) and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, with regard to therapy optimization during PCI and for chronic CAD. We discuss the effects of these oral therapies in reducing ischaemic events, thus augmenting the benefits of PCI, as well as preventing recurrent CV events after the procedure.