Coronary complications of percutaneous coronary intervention: A practical approach to the management of abrupt closure

Comparison of invasive blood pressure monitoring versus normal non-invasive blood pressure monitoring in ST-elevation myocardial infarction patients with percutaneous coronary intervention

BACKGROUND

Hypotension post percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) causes stent thrombosis and reduced coronary perfusion, which aggravate myocardial ischemia and lead to patient death. Therefore, the accuracy and timeliness of blood pressure monitoring (BPM) are crucial for the nursing of patients post PCI. However, it is still controversial whether invasive blood pressure monitoring (IBPM) or non-invasive blood pressure monitoring (NIBPM) should be used for patients post PCI, and the magnitude of their assistance for patients' recovery remains unclear.

METHODS

A randomized controlled trial was performed in this study. 126 ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients post PCI were recruited and randomly divided into two groups (NIBPM group n = 63; IBPM group n = 63).

RESULTS

Clinical characteristics and physiological outcomes of participants received different BPM methods were collected and analyzed to compare the effects of these two methods on the nursing of PCI patients. Compared to NIBPM group, IBPM assisted to shorten the time of myocardial ischemia, promote coronary reperfusion, reduce the occurrence of cardiovascular disease and other complications, and ultimately reduce the mortality of patients post PCI.

CONCLUSION

The application of IBPM contributed to reduce the occurrence of complications, shorten the time of vascular reperfusion, and guide treatment of clinicians in time.

Bailout bypass surgery for complications of coronary interventions

BACKGROUND

Mechanical complications of percutaneous coronary interventions are treated percutaneously in most cases. If the rescue intervention is unsuccessful, bailout bypass surgery is necessary to restore the coronary flow. The surgical risk in these cases is higher than that of patients operated on for other indications. The aim of our study was to characterize patients who underwent surgical treatment at our institution and to compare their long-term outcomes with patients who underwent emergency bypass surgery for other indications.

METHODS

We analyzed 707 consecutive patients who underwent isolated emergency bypass surgery at our institution from 2007 to 2015. In 44 of these cases, the surgery was necessitated by mechanical complications of percutaneous coronary interventions. There were 31 coronary dissections, 5 entrapped guidewires, and 8 coronary perforations. We compared patients in these three groups with one another. Follow-up was performed to assess long-term outcomes.

RESULTS

The median age of the cohort was 68 years (range 59-75 years), and 36 (81.8%) patients presented in cardiogenic shock. Thirty-seven (84.1%) patients had history of a percutaneous coronary intervention. The courses were typical for bypass patients. The long-term survival was similar in all three subgroups (p = 0.16). The survival profiles within our sample did not differ significantly from that in patients who underwent emergency bypass surgery for other indications.

CONCLUSIONS

Surgical risk and short- and long-term outcomes of patients undergoing emergency bypass surgery due to mechanical complications of percutaneous coronary interventions are similar to those of patients receiving the same surgery for other indications.

A Practical Approach to the Management of Complications During Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Percutaneous coronary intervention relieves symptoms in patients with chronic ischemic heart disease resistant to optimal medical therapy and alters the natural history of acute coronary syndromes. However, adverse procedural outcomes may occur during the intervention. Knowledge of possible complications and their timely management are essential for the practicing cardiologist and can be life-saving for the patient. In this review, the authors summarize potential complications of percutaneous coronary intervention focusing on their practical management.

Outcome after coronary bypass grafting for coronary complications following coronary angiography

BACKGROUND

Coronary complications during coronary angiography or intervention (percutaneous coronary intervention [PCI]) are uncommon. However, PCI-related coronary artery perforation, dissection, or acute occlusion frequently result in myocardial ischemia followed by hemodynamic instability and need of urgent coronary artery bypass grafting (coronary artery bypass grafting [CABG]). This single-center study aimed to investigate clinical outcomes of patients undergoing urgent CABG after life-threatening PCI complications.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Data were retrospectively obtained using our institutional patient database. All patients admitted for urgent CABG following PCI-related complications from April 2010 to June 2015 were included into this study. Univariate analysis was performed to identify possible predictors for cardiac mortality.

RESULTS

From a total of 821 urgent CABG patients, 52 patients (6.3%, 66.4 ± 9.4 years) underwent CABG for coronary complication following PCI. Logistic EuroSCORE was 21.8 ± 15.0%. At admission, 22 of 52 (42%) presented in cardiogenic shock, and 24 of 52 (46%) had significant electrocardiogram alterations indicating ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Surgical revascularization was performed by targeting the injured coronary vessel with additional revascularization of other compromised vessels as indicated (mean number of grafts 2.4 ± 0.8). In-hospital cardiac mortality of the patient cohort was 13.5% (7/52) with 15.4% (8/52) in-hospital all-cause mortality. Preoperative resuscitation, cardiogenic shock, and STEMI were predictors for in-hospital cardiac mortality (P < 0.05) in univariate analysis. In contrast, noncardiac comorbidities, type of PCI complication, and localization of the culprit lesion were not associated to increased mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

Emergent or urgent CABG for treatment of acute coronary complications following PCI is feasible and has acceptable clinical results that worsen in the presence of STEMI, cardiogenic shock, or resuscitation. Because preoperative status is crucial for clinical outcomes in these patients, immediate transfer to cardiac surgery is necessary.

Complications of coronary intervention: abrupt closure, dissection, perforation

The introduction of drug-eluting stents (DESs) and superior anticoagulation has successfully improved the safety and patency rates of complex percutaneous coronary interventions (PCIs). The evolving techniques of contemporary PCI have been unable to completely eliminate coronary injury and mechanical complications. Primary causes for abrupt closure include dissection, thrombus formation and acute stent thrombosis. Initial treatment for abrupt closure includes balloon redilatation, optimisation of activated clotting time (ACT) and deployment of stent to stabilise a dissection. Coronary perforation is one of the most challenging and feared complications of PCI. It is most frequently due to distal wire or balloon/stent oversizing and should be fixed with balloon occlusion. Covered stent may be needed for large perforation in major proximal vessels. Perforations in small or distal vessels not resolving with balloon occlusion may be managed by coil or Gelfoam embolisation. Referral to emergency coronary artery bypass surgery (CABG) should be an option in case perforations do not seal.