Real-time evaluation of the hemodynamic effects of atrial septal defect closure in adults with left ventricular dysfunction

Temporary balloon occlusion test can overestimate the risk of acute pulmonary edema after transcatheter atrial septal defect closure

BACKGROUND

Atrial septal defect (ASD) closure can cause acute pulmonary edema. Before transcatheter closure is performed, temporary balloon occlusion test (BOT) is recommended in patients with left ventricular dysfunction to predict the risk of pulmonary edema. However, the accuracy of BOT has not been verified. This study aimed to compare hemodynamic differences between BOT and transcatheter closure.

METHODS

A total of 42 patients with a single ASD over age 18 years who underwent BOT before transcatheter ASD closure between October 2010 and May 2020 were analyzed. Pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP) was measured using a Swan-Ganz catheter placed in the pulmonary artery at baseline, after 10 min of BOT, and after transcatheter closure. Amplatzer septal occluder was used for all transcatheter closures.

RESULTS

Mean patient age was 64 ± 18 years (range, 18-78). Mean ASD diameter and pulmonary to systemic flow ratio were 18 ± 5 and 2.8 ± 1.0 mm, respectively. Mean PCWP at baseline, during BOT, and after transcatheter closure was 8.9 ± 2.9, 13.5 ± 4.2, and 9.5 ± 2.6 mmHg, respectively. The difference between BOT and after transcatheter closure values was significant (p < 0.001). During BOT, PCWP increased ≥18 mmHg in 7 patients, whereas after ASD closure, PCWP was <18 mmHg in all 7 and none developed acute pulmonary edema.

CONCLUSION

Temporary balloon occlusion of an ASD and transcatheter ASD closure result in different hemodynamic change. BOT overestimates increase of PCWP after transcatheter ASD closure and requires careful interpretation. Well-designed, larger studies in higher-risk patients are warranted to verify the clinical implications of BOT in more detail.

Comparison of the Change in Diastolic Dysfunction after Transcatheter Atrial Septal Defect Closure between Asymptomatic Younger and Older Age Groups

Transcatheter device closure of a secundum atrial septal defect (ASD) is followed by a noticeable change in the left atrium (LA) and left ventricle (LV) over a long-term follow-up. This study aimed to assess the remodeling of the atrial and ventricular myocardium with respect to diastolic function in adult ASD patients. Around 38 asymptomatic patients (age: 48.6 ± 17.1 years, range: 23–69 years) diagnosed with ASD during routine health check-up and who underwent ASD device closure with the Amplatzer septal occluder were included in this retrospective study, and their medical records (containing echocardiographic data) were reviewed. The defect size was 21.77 + 6.79 mm, while the balloon measurement of the defect was 24.29 ± 6.64 mm. The patients were divided into two groups, namely, Group I (with 18 patients aged <50 years [mean: 33.06 ± 9.43 years] and Group II (with 20 patients aged ≥50 years [mean: 62.55 ± 7.54 years]). Comparison of echocardiographic data collected before closure and at a follow-up 2 years later revealed significant differences between pre-closure and post-closure states in the left ventricular end-diastolic dimension (40.76 ± 3.28 vs. 43.39 ± 3.52), left ventricular mass (99.64 ± 28.81 vs. 116.57 ± 32.03), and right ventricular pressure (36.88 ± 12.20 vs. 31.81 ± 11.11). Tissue Doppler measurements were significantly decreased 2 years after closure, while the post-closure E/E’ was higher than the pre-closure E/E’ (11.58 ± 4.80 vs. 8.79 + 3.19, p < 0.005). In both groups, mitral A and tissue Doppler E’, A’, and S’ values decreased post-closure, while the E/E’ was higher in Group II than in Group I at both pre-closure and long-term follow-up measurements (pre-closure: 9.60 ± 5.15 vs. 7.41 ± 1.42, p < 0.003; post-closure: 13.03 + 4.05 vs. 10.49 ± 3.95, p < 0.02). The LA size and LV function exhibited recognizable remodeling after transcatheter ASD closure. Because the LV preload elevation (i.e., E/E’) after ASD closure can be pronounced in older patients, caution should be provided more in older patients than in younger patients. Hence, it may be beneficial to close the ASD at an earlier age in adults even after a late diagnosis; a relatively younger age may be more suited for adaptation to the remodeling process to protect the myocardial function. Careful consideration should be given to the previous underloaded left heart after long-term closure.