Eosinophilic tissue response several weeks after sirolimus-eluting cypher stent implantation within a bare metal stent in a coronary saphenous vein graft

In-stent restenosis exacerbated by drug-induced severe eosinophilia after second-generation drug-eluting stent implantation

Patient: Male, 83

Final Diagnosis: In-stent restenosis

Symptoms: Chest discomfort

Medication: —

Clinical Procedure: Cardiac catheterization

Specialty: Cardiology

Paclitaxel-eluting stents reduce neointimal hyperplasia compared to bare metal stents in saphenous vein grafts: intravascular ultrasonography analysis of the SOS (Stenting of Saphenous Vein Grafts) trial

AIMS

To compare the intravascular ultrasonography (IVUS) findings between saphenous vein grafts (SVG) treated with paclitaxel-eluting stents (PES) vs. bare metal stents (BMS) in the Stenting Of Saphenous Vein Grafts (SOS) trial.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Of the 80 SOS trial patients, 38 had both baseline and follow-up IVUS examination and were included in this substudy: 17 patients received 28 BMS in 26 lesions and 21 patients received 30 PES in 28 lesions. Quantitative IVUS analysis was performed to determine the volume of in-stent neointimal hyperplasia (NIH) - defined as the difference between stent volume and lumen volume in the stented segments. Baseline characteristics were similar between patients who did and did not undergo baseline and follow-up IVUS. Patients receiving BMS and PES had similar stent and lumen volumes immediately after stenting. At 12-month follow-up, compared to BMS, PES-treated lesions had significantly less NIH volume (3.4 vs. 21.9 mm³, p<0.001) and neointima hyperplasia progression (1.6 vs. 17.1 mm³, p<0.001). No significant differences were seen in the 5 mm segment proximal and distal to the stent.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared to BMS, use of PES in SVG lesions is associated with significantly lower NIH formation, which may help explain the improved clinical outcomes with PES in these lesions.

Eosinophil cationic protein and clinical outcome after bare metal stent implantation

OBJECTIVE

we assessed the association between baseline eosinophil cationic protein (ECP) levels, a sensitive marker of eosinophil activation, and clinical outcome in patients undergoing bare metal stent (BMS) implantation.

METHODS

basal ECP levels were measured in 110 patients (69±11 years, 88 men) undergoing BMS implantation. Major adverse cardiac events (MACEs), defined as cardiac death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, or clinically-driven target lesion revascularization, were registered at 24-month follow-up.

RESULTS

eighteen (16.4%) patients had MACEs and showed higher ECP levels compared with those without MACEs [20.1 (9.8-47.3) vs. 9.5 (5.0-27.2) g/L, p=0.02]. At follow-up, ECP level>11 g/L was the only significant predictor of MACEs (HR 3.5, 95% CI 1.1-10.4, p=0.03).

CONCLUSION

basal ECP levels are associated with MACEs after BMS implantation, suggesting that an allergic-mediated inflammation against the metal could explain some adverse reactions occurring after coronary stenting.