Comparison of in vivo acute stent recoil between the bioabsorbable everolimus-eluting coronary stent and the everolimus-eluting cobalt chromium coronary stent: Insights from the ABSORB and SPIRIT trials

Long-term intracoronary imaging and physiological measurements of bioresorbable scaffolds and untreated atherosclerotic plaques

BACKGROUND

Bioresorbable scaffolds (BRS) provide the prospect of restoring the anatomic and physiologic characteristics of the vascular wall.

OBJECTIVE

This study sought to examine the long-term outcomes of BRS-based coronary intervention in a young population with diffuse and severe coronary atherosclerotic disease (CAD) and to compare the long-term evolution of treated segments versus the natural progression of untreated non-flow limiting stenoses.

METHODS

Observational, single-center cohort study that prospectively included patients that underwent percutaneous coronary intervention with implantation of ABSORB BRS (Abbott Vascular). The clinical endpoint was the incidence of device-oriented composite endpoint (DoCE) up to 5 years follow-up. A subgroup of patients with baseline intracoronary imaging assessment of long lesions and/or multivessel disease underwent elective angiographic (70 patients, 129 lesions) and intracoronary imaging (55 patients, 102 lesions) follow-up. Paired intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) and quantitative flow reserve (QFR) were analyzed.

RESULTS

Between 2012 and 2017, 159 patients (mean age 54.0 ± 11.1) with native CAD were treated with BRS on 247 lesions. Patients were mainly at their first cardiac event, mostly acute coronary syndromes (86.5%). At the median follow-up time of 56 months [41-65], DoCE occurred in 15/159 (9.4%) patients, while non-target vessel-oriented composite endpoint occurred in 16 patients (10.4%). A significant atherosclerotic progression was detected on residual non-flow limiting plaques as per IVUS and QFR assessment, while no significant change was detected in the treated segment.

CONCLUSIONS

Mild-to-moderate asymptomatic CAD progressed significantly at 5-year despite OMT. BRS-treated segments had a less aggressive progression at 5-year despite more severe and symptomatic CAD at baseline.

Safety and efficacy of a novel 3D-printed bioresorbable sirolimus-eluting scaffold in a porcine model

Background

The effect of 3D-printed bioresorbable vascular scaffolds (BRS) in coronary heart disease has not been clarified.

Aims

We aimed to compare the safety and efficacy of 3D-printed BRS with that of metallic sirolimus-eluting stents (SES).

Methods

Thirty-two BRS and 32 SES were implanted into 64 porcine coronary arteries. Quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) and optical coherence tomography (OCT) were performed at 14, 28, 97, and 189 days post-implantation. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and histopathological analyses were performed at each assessment.

Results

All stents/scaffolds were successfully implanted. All animals survived for the duration of the study. QCA showed the two devices had a similar stent/scaffold-to-artery ratio and acute percent recoil. OCT showed the lumen area (LA) and scaffold/stent area (SA) of the BRS were significantly smaller than those of the SES at 14 and 28 days post-implantation (14-day LA: BRS vs SES 4.52±0.41 mm2 vs 5.69±1.11 mm2; p=0.03; 14-day SA: BRS vs SES 4.99±0.45 mm2 vs 6.11±1.06 mm2; p=0.03; 28-day LA: BRS vs SES 2.93±1.03 mm2 vs 4.82±0.74 mm2; p=0.003; 28-day SA: BRS vs SES 3.86±0.98 mm2 vs 5.75±0.71 mm2; p=0.03). Both the LA and SA of the BRS increased over time and were similar to those of the SES at the 97-day and 189-day assessments. SEM and histomorphological analyses showed no significant between-group differences in endothelialisation at each assessment.

Conclusions

The novel 3D-printed BRS showed safety and efficacy similar to that of SES in a porcine model. The BRS also showed a long-term positive remodelling effect.

Predictors and outcomes of acute recoil after ultrathin bioresorbable polymer sirolimus-eluting stents implantation: an intravascular ultrasound in native coronary arteries

BACKGROUND

Ultrathin bioresorbable polymer sirolimus-eluting stents (BP-SESs) may easily lead to acute recoil. This study investigated acute recoil after BP-SES implantation on the basis of intravascular ultrasound (IVUS).

METHODS

We enrolled 40 consecutive stents. Absolute acute recoil by quantitative coronary angiography was defined as the difference between the mean diameter of the last inflated balloon (X) and mean lumen diameter of the BP-SES immediately after balloon deflation (Y). Percent (%) acute recoil was defined as (X-Y)×100/X. IVUS was performed within the culprit lesion. Plaque eccentricity, % plaque burden and calcification grade score were assessed using IVUS. Calcification grade was scored on the basis of quadrants. On the basis of the median acute recoil value of 5.0%, the stents were divided into two groups: low (LAR, n = 20) and high % acute recoil (HAR, n = 20).

RESULTS

Mean % acute recoil was 5.8 ± 5.3%. Plaque eccentricity, % plaque burden and stent/artery ratio were significantly higher in the HAR group than in the LAR group. Significant differences in % acute recoil were not observed regarding the types of stent diameter. In multivariate logistic regression and multiple linear regression analysis, plaque eccentricity and % plaque burden in the culprit plaque were significant positive predictors for the occurrence of % acute recoil. No significant differences, including clinical outcomes, were found between both groups at follow-up.

CONCLUSION

Acute recoil of BP-SESs may be influenced by an eccentric plaque with a large burden, which did not affect long-term outcomes. However, the present study might suggest the proper strategy (e.g. a more exhaustive plaque preparation) before BP-SES implantation in a case with these IVUS characteristics.

PALMAZ–SCHATZ STENT-OPENING MECHANICS USING A SIMPLE APPROACH INVOLVING THE BALLOON–STENT AND STENT–ARTERY CONTACT PROBLEM: APPLICATION TO BIOPOLYMER STENTS

We used the finite element method-based toolbox COMSOL Multiphysics to address the important question of biopolymer coronary stent mechanics. We evaluated the diameter of the stent, the immediate elastic recoil, the dogboning and the foreshortening during deployment while using an idealized model that took into account the presence of the balloon and the coronary artery wall (equivalent pressure hypothesis). We validated our model using the well-known mechanics of the Palmaz–Schatz metal stent and acquired new data concerning a poly-L-lactic acid (PLLA) stent and some other biodegradable co-polymer-based stents. The elastic recoil was relatively high (26.1% to 31.1% depending on the biopolymer used) when taking into account the presence of both the balloon and artery. The dogboning varied from 31% to 46% for the polymer stents and was 62% for the metal stent, suggesting that less arterial damage could be expected with biopolymer stents. Various strut thicknesses were tested for the PLLA stent (114, 180 and 250[Formula: see text][Formula: see text]m) and no significant improvement in elastic recoil was observed. We concluded that the stent geometry has a greater impact on the scaffolding role of the structure than the strut thickness, or even the mechanical properties of the stent.

Routine use of optical coherence tomography in bioresorbable vascular scaffold implantation: insights on technique optimization and long-term outcomes

BACKGROUND

Data from prior studies have shown increased risk of adverse outcomes with bioresorbable vascular scaffolds (BVS) compared with drug-eluting stents.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to study the long-term outcomes with routine use of optical coherence tomography (OCT) for optimization of BVS implantation.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Clinical, procedural, and outcome data were collected for all patients who received ABSORB BVS between February 2014 and March 2016 in our tertiary center (n=86). Preimplantation and postimplantation OCT was performed in all cases. Outcomes of interest included acute device success and long-term clinical outcomes including cardiac mortality, target vessel myocardial infarction, ischemia-driven target lesion revascularization, and scaffold thrombosis.

RESULTS

A total of 86 patients were included (106 lesions, 115 BVS implanted). Mean age was 59.5±10.9 years, with 66% men. Mean lesion length was 25.2±15.6 mm and mean reference vessel diameter was 3.42±0.45 mm. Type B2/C accounted for 40% of the lesions. All scaffold implantations followed the predilation, proper sizing, and postdilation strategy. Of the 115 scaffolds analyzed, 11 (9.5%) required further intervention based on prespecified OCT endpoints. On multivariate regression analysis, complex coronary lesion (type B2/C) was the single independent predictor of OCT use in scaffold optimization (odds ratio=6.3, 95% confidence interval: 1.3-7.8, P=0.02). At a mean follow-up duration of 31±7.1 months, no cases of cardiac mortality, target vessel myocardial infarction, ischemia-driven target lesion revascularization, or scaffold thrombosis were reported.

CONCLUSION

Operators may consider OCT use for optimization of BVS implantation particularly in patients with complex coronary lesions.

The evolution of coronary stents

INTRODUCTION

Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is 40 years old this year. From its humble beginnings of experimental work, PCI has transitioned over years with coronary artery stenting now a standard medical procedure performed throughout the world. Areas covered: The conversion from plain old balloon angioplasty (POBA) to the present era of drug eluting stents (DES) has been driven by many technological advances and large bodies of clinical trial evidence. The journey to present day practice has seen many setbacks, such as acute vessel closure with POBA; rates of instant restenosis with bare metal stents (BMS) and more recently, high rates of stent thrombosis with bioabsorbable platforms. This work discusses POBA, why there was a need for BMS, the use of inhibiting drugs to create 1^st generation DES, the change of components to 2^nd generation DES, the use of absorbable drug reservoirs and platforms, and possible future directions with Prohealing Endothelial Progenitor Cell Capture Stents. Expert commentary: This paper reviews the evolution from the original pioneering work to modern day practice, highlighting landmark trials that changed practice. Modern day contemporary practice is now very safe based on the latest drug eluting stents and supported by large datasets.

Undesired Outcomes of the Catania Stent Compared to the Xience Stent in Patients Undergoing Angioplasty: A Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial

Background

The present study tries to compare the unintended outcomes of the Catania stent versus Xience stent in patients undergoing angioplasty.

Materials and Methods

In a three month, follow-up, double-blinded, randomized controlled trial, 83 patients undergoing angioplasty, who met the inclusion criteria were entered into the study. After randomization 43 patients were treated with the Xience stent and 40 patients with the Catania stent. Stent-related outcomes such as Cardiac and Non-Cardiovascular Death, Myocardial Infarction (MI), Target Lesion Revascularization (TLR), Stent Thrombosis (ST), Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting (CABG), Peripheral vasculopathy, and Cerebral Vascular Accident (CVA) were compared between the groups.

Results

There was no statistically significant difference in the incidence rate of complications and clinical outcomes between the two treatment groups (P > 0.05). The incidence of MI, TLR, CABG operation, peripheral vasculopathy, or CVA was not observed in any patient and there was no statistically difference in mortality (4.7% vs. 2.5%; P = 0.527) and stent thrombosis (2.3% vs. 2.5%; P = 0.735).

Conclusion

All in all, the present study could not find the significant differences between the Catania stent and Xience stent in terms of clinical outcomes during the follow-up period.

Impact of calcium on procedural and clinical outcomes in lesions treated with bioresorbable vascular scaffolds - A prospective BRS registry study

BACKGROUND

There is limited data on the impact of calcium (Ca) on acute procedural and clinical outcomes in patients with lesions treated with bioresorbable vascular scaffolds (BRS). We sought to evaluate the effect of calcium on procedural and clinical outcomes in a 'real world' population.

METHODS

Clinical outcomes were compared between patients with at least 1 moderately or heavily calcified lesion (Ca) and patients with no/mild calcified lesions (non-Ca) enrolled in our institutional BRS registry.

RESULTS

455 patients (N) with 548 lesions (L) treated with 735 BRS were studied. Patients in the Ca group (N=160, L=200) had more complex (AHA B2/C lesion: 69.0% in Ca vs 14.9% in non-Ca, p<0.001) and significantly longer lesions (27.80±15.27 vs 19.48±9.92mm, p<0.001). Overall device success rate was 99.1% with no significant differences between the groups. Despite more aggressive lesion preparation and postdilation compared to non Ca, acute lumen gain was significantly less in Ca lesions (1.50±0.66 vs 1.62±0.69mm, p=0.040) with lower final MLD (2.28±0.41 vs 2.36±0.43, p=0.046). There were no significant differences in all-cause mortality, total definite scaffold thrombosis (ST), target lesion revascularization and myocardial infarction between the 2 groups. Late ST was more frequent in the Ca group compared to non Ca group (late ST: 2.1 vs 0%, p=0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

Clinical outcomes after BRS implantation in calcified and non-calcified lesions were similar. A remarkable difference in timing of thrombosis was observed, with an increased rate of late thrombosis in calcified lesions.

Current status and future direction of biodegradable metallic and polymeric vascular scaffolds for next-generation stents

Because of the increasing incidence of coronary artery disease, the importance of cardiovascular stents has continuously increased as a treatment of this disease. Biodegradable scaffolds fabricated from polymers and metals have emerged as promising materials for vascular stents because of their biodegradability. Although such stent framework materials have shown good clinical efficacy, it is difficult to decide whether polymers or metals are better vascular scaffolds because their properties are different. Therefore, there are still obstacles in the development of biodegradable vascular scaffolds in terms of improving clinical efficacy. This review analyzes the pros and cons of current stent materials with respect to five key factors for next-generation stent and discusses methods of improvement. Furthermore, we discuss biodegradable electronic stents with electrical conductivity, which has been considered unimportant until now, and highlight electrical conductivity as a key factor in the development of next-generation stents.

Conformability in everolimus-eluting bioresorbable scaffolds compared with metal platform coronary stents in long lesions

The aim of this study was to determine if there are significant differences in curvature of the treated vessel after the deployment of a polymeric BRS or MPS in long lesions. The impact of long polymeric bioresorbable scaffolds (BRS) compared with metallic platform stents (MPS) on vessel curvature is unknown. This retrospective study compares 32 patients who received a single everolimus-eluting BRS with 32 patients treated with a single MPS of 28 mm. Quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) was used to evaluate curvature of the treatment and peri-treatment region before and after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Baseline demographic and angiographic characteristics were similar between the BRS and MPS groups. Pretreatment lesion length was 22.19 versus 20.38 mm in the BRS and MPS groups respectively (p = 0.803). After treatment, there was a decrease in median diastolic curvature in the MPS group (from 0.257 to 0.199 cm^-1, p = 0.001). A similar trend was observed in the BRS group but did not reach statistical significance (median diastolic curvature from 0.305 to 0.283 cm^-1, p = 0.056). Median Percentage relative change in diastolic curvature was lower in the BRS group compared with the MPS group (BRS vs. MPS: 7.48 vs. 29.4%, p = 0.013). By univariate analysis, use of MPS was an independent predictor of change in diastolic curvature (p = 0.022). In the deployment of long coronary scaffolds/stents (28 mm in length), BRS provides better conformability compared with MPS.

Is bioresorbable vascular scaffold acute recoil affected by baseline renal function and scaffold selection?

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the present study was to investigate the relationship between glomerular filtration rate (GFR) and acute post-scaffold recoil (PSR) in patients undergoing bioresorbable scaffold (BVS) implantation.

METHODS

We included 130 patients who underwent everolimus-eluting BVS device (Absorb BVS; Abbott Vascular, Santa Clara, CA, USA) or the novolimus-eluting BVS device (Elixir Medical Corporation) implantations for single or multi-vessel disease. Clinical, angiographic variables and procedural characteristics were defined and pre-procedural GFR was calculated for each patient. Post-procedural angiographic parameters of each patient were analyzed. Primary objective of the study was to evaluate the effect of GFR on angiographic outcomes after BVS implantation while secondary objective was to compare post-procedural angiographic results between the two BVS device groups.

RESULTS

Baseline clinical characteristics and angiographic parameters were similar between the two BVS groups. Post-procedural angiographic analysis revealed significantly lower PSR in the DESolve group than the Absorb group (0.10±0.04 vs. 0.13±0.05, p: 0.003). When PSR in the whole study population was evaluated, it was positively correlated with age, tortuosity , calcification and PBR as there was a negative correlation between GFR. Besides GFR were found to be independent predictors for PSR in all groups and the whole study population.

CONCLUSION

In patients undergoing BVS implantation, pre-procedural low GFR is associated with increased post-procedural PSR. Calcification, age, PBR, dyslipidemia and tortuosity are other independent risk factors for PSR. DESolve has lower PSR when compared with Absorb.

Bioresorbable Scaffolds: Current Evidences in the Treatment of Coronary Artery Disease

Percutaneous coronary revascularization strategies have gradually progressed over a period of last few decades. The advent of newer generation drug-eluting stents has significantly improved the outcomes of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI) by substantially reducing in-stent restenosis and stent thrombosis. However, vascular inflammation, restenosis, thrombosis, and neoatherosclerosis due to the permanent presence of a metallic foreign body within the artery limit their usage in complex Coronary Artery Disease (CAD). Bioresorbable Scaffolds (BRS) represent a novel approach in coronary stent technology. Complete resorption of the scaffold liberates the treated vessel from its cage and restores pulsatility, cyclical strain, physiological shear stress, and mechanotransduction. In this review article, we describe the advances in this rapidly evolving technology, present the evidence from the pre-clinical and clinical evaluation of these devices, and provide an overview of the ongoing clinical trials that were designed to examine the effectiveness of BRS in the clinical setting.

A review of bioresorbable scaffolds: hype or hope?

In the field of percutaneous coronary intervention, the evolution of coronary metal stents has been well established for the past three decades, but research on bioresorbable scaffolds has only gained momentum in the recent past. Although second-generation drug-eluting metal stents are the gold standard for the treatment of obstructive coronary artery disease, a few drawbacks exist. The development of bioresorbable scaffolds is an attempt to overcome the limitations of metal stents. This review highlights the rationale for the bioresorbable scaffold, its properties and potential applications. It also focuses on the current evidence and concerns regarding the application of the bioresorbable scaffold in day-to-day practice.

First-generation paclitaxel- vs. second-generation zotarolimus-eluting stents in small coronary arteries: the BASKET-SMALL Pilot Study

Introduction

Event rates after percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) are higher in small than large coronary vessels but may vary between different drug-eluting stent (DES) types.

Aim

To assess the efficacy of two different DES in small vessel disease.

Material and methods

Patients with small vessel PCI were randomised 1 : 1 to a first-generation paclitaxel- vs. a second-generation zotarolimus-eluting stent. The primary endpoint was a composite of cardiac death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, and target vessel revascularisation after 2 years.

Results

Overall, 191 patients were enrolled: 100 with a paclitaxel- and 91 with a zotarolimus-eluting stent. Baseline characteristics were similar in both groups. After 2 years, rates of the primary endpoint were numerically higher for zotarolimus- than paclitaxel-eluting stents (9.9% vs. 5.0%, hazard ratio 2.09, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.7–6.2, p = 0.19), which was mainly driven by higher rates of target vessel revascularisation (6.6% vs. 2.0%, hazard ratio 3.39, 95% CI: 0.68–16.78, p = 0.14). Based on this, a total of 1,019 patients would be necessary to demonstrate at least non-inferiority between the DES used.

Conclusions

In this pilot study, paclitaxel-eluting stents had a favourable efficacy profile in small vessel disease, although the numbers were too small to draw final conclusions. Based on the prohibitively high sample size for a randomized controlled trial between DES, other treatment options should be considered.

Predictors of acute scaffold recoil after implantation of the everolimus-eluting bioresorbable scaffold: an optical coherence tomography assessment in native coronary arteries

This study investigated the predictors of acute recoil after implantation of everolimus-eluting BRS based on optical coherence tomography (OCT). Thirty-nine patients (56 scaffolds) were enrolled. Acute absolute recoil by quantitative coronary angiography was defined as the difference between the mean diameter of the last inflated balloon (X) and the mean lumen diameter of BRS immediately after balloon deflation (Y). Acute percent recoil was defined as (X - Y) × 100/X. Plaque eccentricity (PE) and plaque composition (PC) were assessed by OCT. PC was classified into two different types: calcific (score = 1), fibrous and lipid (score = 0). Based on the mean acute scaffold recoil value of the present study, scaffolds were divided into two groups: the low acute recoil group (LAR, n = 34) and the high acute recoil group (HAR, n = 22). Acute percent and absolute recoil were 6.4 ± 3.0 % and 0.19 ± 0.11 mm. PE, PC score and scaffold/artery ratio were significantly higher in HAR than in LAR. In multivariate logistic regression analysis, PE > 1.49, PC score (score 1) and scaffold/artery ratio >1.07 were significant positive predictors for the occurrence of acute scaffold recoil (OR 10.7, 95 % CI 2.2-51.4, p < 0.01; OR 5.6, 95 % CI 1.9-22.0, p = 0.04; OR 12.4, 95 % CI 2.6-65.4, p < 0.01, respectively). Acute recoil of BRS is influenced by BRS sizing as well as OCT-derived plaque characteristics.

Bioresorbable vascular scaffolds - basic concepts and clinical outcome

The introduction of percutaneous treatment of coronary artery stenosis with balloon angioplasty was the first revolution in interventional cardiology; the advent of metallic coronary stents (bare and drug-eluting) marked the second and third revolutions. However, the latest generation of drug-eluting stents is limited by several factors. Permanent vessel caging impairs arterial physiology, and the incidence of very late stent thrombosis - although lower with the second generation than with the first generation of drug-eluting stents - remains a major concern. This complication is mainly related to the presence of permanent metallic implants, chronic degeneration triggered by an inflammatory response to the coating polymer, and/or adverse effects of antiproliferative drugs on endothelial regeneration. In 2011, self-degrading coronary stents - the bioresorbable vascular scaffolds (BVS) - were introduced into clinical practice, showing good short-term results owing to their adequate strength. The advantage of these devices is the transient nature of vascular scaffolding, which avoids permanent vessel caging. In this Review, we summarize the latest research on BVS, with a particular emphasis on the implantation technique (which is different from that used with metallic stents) to outline the concept that BVS deployment methods have a major effect on procedural success and prognosis of patients with coronary artery stenosis. Furthermore, the clinical outcome of BVS in randomized clinical trials and in phase IV studies are discussed in different pathophysiological settings, such as stable or acute coronary disease. Finally, all the available data on the safety profile of BVS regarding scaffold thrombosis are discussed.

Optical Coherence Tomography Findings in Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffolds Thrombosis

BACKGROUND

Everolimus-eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffolds have been developed to improve late outcomes after coronary interventions. However, recent registries raised concerns regarding an increased incidence of scaffold thrombosis (ScT). The mechanism of ScT remains unknown.

METHODS AND RESULTS

The present study investigated angiographic and optical coherence tomography findings in patients experiencing ScT. Fifteen ScT (14 patients, 79% male, age 59±10 years) occurred at a median of 16 days (25%-75% interquartile range: 1-263 days) after implantation. Early ScT (<30 days) occurred in 8 cases (53%). Possible causal factors in these patients included insufficient platelet inhibition in 2 cases and procedural factors (scaffold underexpansion, undersizing, or geographical miss) in 4 cases. No obvious cause could be found in 2 early ScT. In late (>1 month) and very late (>1 year) ScT (respectively, 5 and 2 cases), 5 scaffolds showed intimal neovessels or marked peristrut low-intensity areas. Scaffold fractures were additionally found in 2 patients, and scaffold collapse was found in 1 patient with very late ScT. Extensive strut malapposition was the presumed cause for ScT in 1 case. One scaffold did not show any morphological abnormality. Thrombectomy specimens were analyzed in 3 patients and did not demonstrate increased numbers of inflammatory cells.

CONCLUSIONS

The mechanisms of early ScT seem to be similar to metallic stents (mechanical and inadequate antiplatelet therapy). The predominant finding in late and very late ScT is peristrut low-intensity area.

"Assessment of effectiveness and security in high pressure postdilatation of bioresorbable vascular scaffolds during percutaneous coronary intervention. Study in a contemporary, non-selected cohort of Spanish patients"

OBJECTIVES

To determine security and benefits of high pressure postdilatation (HPP) of bioresorbable vascular scaffolds (BVS) in percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of complex lesions whatever its indication is.

BACKGROUND

Acute scaffold disruption has been proposed as the main limitation of BVS when they are overexpanded. However, clinical implications of this disarray are not yet clear and more evidence is needed.

METHODS

A total of 25 BVS were deployed during PCI of 14 complex lesions after mandatory predilatation. In all cases HPP was performed with NC balloon in a 1:1 relation to the artery. After that, optical coherence tomography (OCT) analyses were performed.

RESULTS

Mean and maximal postdilatation pressure were 17±3.80 and 20 atmospheres (atm) respectively. Postdilatation balloon/scaffold diameter ratio was 1.01. A total of 39,590 struts were analyzed. Mean, minimal and maximal scaffold diameter were respectively: 3.09±0.34mm, 2.88±0.31mm and 3.31±0.40mm. Mean eccentricity index was 0.13±0.05. ISA percentage was 1.42% with a total of 564 malapposed struts. 89 struts were identified as disrupted, which represents a percentage of disrupted struts of 0.22%. At 30days, none of our patients died, suffered from stroke, stent thrombosis or needed target lesion revascularization (TLR).

CONCLUSIONS

NC balloon HPP of BVS at more than 17atm (up to 20atm) is safe during PCI and allows to achieve better angiographic and clinical results.

In vitro performance investigation of bioresorbable scaffolds - Standard tests for vascular stents and beyond

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE

Biodegradable polymers are the main materials for coronary scaffolds. Magnesium has been investigated as a potential alternative and was successfully tested in human clinical trials. However, it is still challenging to achieve mechanical parameters comparative to permanent bare metal (BMS) and drug-eluting stents (DES). As such, in vitro tests are required to assess mechanical parameters correlated to the safety and efficacy of the device.

METHODS/MATERIALS

In vitro bench tests evaluate scaffold profiles, length, deliverability, expansion behavior including acute elastic and time-dependent recoil, bending stiffness and radial strength. The Absorb GT1 (Abbott Vascular, Temecula, CA), DESolve (Elixir Medical Corporation, Sunnyvale, CA) and the Magmaris (BIOTRONIK AG, Bülach, Switzerland) that was previously tested in the BIOSOLVE II study, were tested.

RESULTS

Crimped profiles were 1.38±0.01mm (Absorb GT1), 1.39±0.01mm (DESolve) and 1.44±0.00mm (Magmaris) enabling 6F compatibility. Trackability was measured depending on stiffness and force transmission (pushability). Acute elastic recoil was measured at free expansion and within a mock vessel, respectively, yielding results of 5.86±0.76 and 5.22±0.38% (Absorb), 7.85±3.45 and 9.42±0.21% (DESolve) and 5.57±0.72 and 4.94±0.31% (Magmaris). Time-dependent recoil (after 1h) was observed for the Absorb and DESolve scaffolds but not for the Magmaris. The self-correcting wall apposition behavior of the DESolve did not prevent time-dependent recoil under vessel loading.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of the suggested test methods allow assessment of technical feasibility based on objective mechanical data and highlight the main differences between polymeric and metallic bioresorbable scaffolds.

Bioresorbable scaffold - A magic bullet for the treatment of coronary artery disease?

Today, drug-eluting metal stents are considered the gold standard for interventional treatment of coronary artery disease. While providing inhibition of neointimal hyperplasia, drug-eluting metal stents have many limitations such as the risk of late and very late stent thrombosis, restriction of vascular vasomotion and chronic local inflammatory reaction due to permanent implantation of a 'metallic cage', recognized as a foreign body. Bioresorbable scaffold stents (BRS) are a new solution, which is trying to overcome the limitation of the 'metallic cage'. This structure provides short-term scaffolding of the vessel and then disappears, leaving nothing behind. The purpose of this review is to present the theoretical rationale for the use of BRS and to outline the clinical outcomes associated with their use in terms of data obtained from RCTs, clinical trials, registries and real life use. We have also tried to answer all questions on this intervention based on available data, with a focus on ABSORB BVS (Abbott Vascular, Santa Clara, USA). We consider that this new technology can be the "magic bullet" to treat coronary artery disease.

Bioresorbable scaffolds: a new paradigm in percutaneous coronary intervention

Numerous advances and innovative therapies have been introduced in interventional cardiology over the recent years, since the first introduction of balloon angioplasty, but bioresorbable scaffold is certainly one of the most exciting and attracting one. Despite the fact that the metallic drug-eluting stents have significantly diminished the re-stenosis ratio, they have considerable limitations including the hypersensitivity reaction to the polymer that can cause local inflammation, the risk of neo-atherosclerotic lesion formation which can lead to late stent failure as well as the fact that they may preclude surgical revascularization and distort vessel physiology. Bioresorbable scaffolds overcome these limitations as they have the ability to dissolve after providing temporary scaffolding which safeguards vessel patency. In this article we review the recent developments in the field and provide an overview of the devices and the evidence that support their efficacy in the treatment of CAD. Currently 3 devices are CE marked and in clinical use. Additional 24 companies are developing these kind of coronary devices. Most frequently used material is PLLA followed by magnesium.

Successful technical and clinical outcome using a second generation balloon expandable coronary stent for transplant renal artery stenosis: Our experience

Transplant renal artery stenosis (TRAS) is a vascular complication frequently seen because of increase in the number of renal transplantations. Early diagnosis and management is essential to optimize a proper graft function. Currently, the endovascular treatment of TRAS using angioplasty and/or stenting is considered the treatment of choice with the advantage that it does not preclude subsequent surgical correction. Treatment of TRAS with the use of stents, particularly in tortuous transplant renal anatomy presents a unique challenge to an interventional radiologist. In this study, we present three cases from our practice highlighting the use of a balloon-expandable Multi-Link RX Ultra coronary stent system (Abbott Laboratories, Abbott Park, Illinois, USA) for treating high grade focal stenosis along very tortuous renal arterial segments. Cobalt-Chromium alloy stent scaffold provides excellent radial force, whereas the flexible stent design conforms to the vessel course allowing for optimal stent alignment.

Absorb bioresorbable vascular scaffold: What have we learned after 5 years of clinical experience?

Bioresorbable scaffolds have the potential to introduce a paradigm shift in interventional cardiology, a true anatomical and functional "vascular restoration" instead of an artificial stiff tube encased by persistent metallic foreign body. Early clinical studies using the first commercially available drug-eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffold (BVS) reported very promising safety and efficacy outcomes, comparable to best-in-class second-generation drug-eluting metal stent. To date, more than 60,000 Absorb BVSs have been implanted with only the interim analysis of one randomized trial (ABSORB II RCT) available. Recent registries have challenged the initial claim that BVS is immune from Scaffold Thrombosis (ST). However, suboptimal device expansion and insufficient intracoronary imaging guidance can explain higher than expected ST, especially in complex lesions. The aim of this review article is to critically evaluate the results of the available Absorb BVS studies and discuss the lessons learned to optimize lesion selection and implantation technique of such devices.

Current status of clinically available bioresorbable scaffolds in percutaneous coronary interventions

Drug-eluting stents (DES) are widely used as first choice devices in percutaneous coronary interventions. However, certain concerns are associated with the use of DES, i.e. delayed arterial healing with a subsequent risk of neo-atherosclerosis, late stent thrombosis and hypersensitivity reactions to the DES polymer. Bioresorbable vascular scaffolds are the next step in percutaneous coronary interventions introducing the concept of supporting the natural healing process following initial intervention without leaving any foreign body materials resulting in late adverse events. The first-generation devices have shown encouraging results in multiple studies of selected patients up to the point of full bioresorption, supporting the introduction in regular patient care. During its introduction in daily clinical practice outside the previously selected patient groups, a careful approach should be followed in which outcome is continuously monitored.

Current status of bioresorbable scaffolds in the treatment of coronary artery disease

State-of-the-art drug-eluting metal stents are the gold standard for interventional treatment of coronary artery disease. Although they overcome some disadvantages and limitations of plain balloon angioplasty and bare-metal stents, some limitations apply, most notably a chronic local inflammatory reaction due to permanent implantation of a foreign body, restriction of vascular vasomotion due to a metal cage, and the risk of late and very late stent thrombosis. The development of biodegradable scaffolds is a new approach that attempts to circumvent these drawbacks. These devices provide short-term scaffolding of the vessel and then dissolve, which should theoretically circumvent the side effects of metal drug-eluting stents. Various types of these bioresorbable scaffolds are currently under clinical evaluation. This review discusses different concepts of bioresorbable scaffolds with respect to material, design, and drug elution and presents the most recent evidence.

ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction – ideal scenario for bioresorbable vascular scaffold implantation?

Bioresorbable vascular scaffolds (BVS) represent a breakthrough technology for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). In this context, because of the unique properties of bioresorbable devices, ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) may represent the ideal scenario for BVS implantation. Consistently, 57% of physicians declare they currently use BVS in this group of patients. However, continuous and growing evidence on the good performance of these devices has been actually shown only in small studies with short- and mid-term follow-up. For these reasons, we need data from sufficiently large observational studies, with long-term follow-up, to confirm that BVS can deliver the same results as 2nd-generation drug-eluting stents when using an appropriate implantation technique. In this review, we discuss the potential advantages of BVS implantation in STEMI patients, together with the most recent evidence from clinical studies, highlighting safety and procedural concerns.

A bioresorbable everolimus-eluting scaffold versus a metallic everolimus-eluting stent for ischaemic heart disease caused by de-novo native coronary artery lesions (ABSORB II): an interim 1-year analysis of clinical and procedural secondary outcomes from a randomised controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Despite rapid dissemination of an everolimus-eluting bioresorbable scaffold for treatment for coronary artery disease, no data from comparisons with its metallic stent counterpart are available. In a randomised controlled trial we aimed to compare an everolimus-eluting bioresorbable scaffold with an everolimus-eluting metallic stent. Here we report secondary clinical and procedural outcomes after 1 year of follow-up.

METHODS

In a single-blind, multicentre, randomised trial, we enrolled eligible patients aged 18-85 years with evidence of myocardial ischaemia and one or two de-novo native lesions in different epicardial vessels. We randomly assigned patients in a 2:1 ratio to receive treatment with an everolimus-eluting bioresorbable scaffold (Absorb, Abbott Vascular, Santa Clara, CA, USA) or treatment with an everolimus-eluting metallic stent (Xience, Abbott Vascular, Santa Clara, CA, USA). Randomisation was stratified by diabetes status and number of planned target lesions. The co-primary endpoints of this study are vasomotion (change in mean lumen diameter before and after nitrate administration at 3 years) and difference between minimum lumen diameter (after nitrate administration) after the index procedure and at 3 years. Secondary endpoints were procedural performance assessed by quantitative angiography and intravascular ultrasound; composite clinical endpoints based on death, myocardial infarction, and coronary revascularisation; device and procedural success; and angina status assessed by the Seattle Angina Questionnaire and exercise testing at 6 and 12 months. Cumulative angina rate based on adverse event reporting was analysed post hoc. This trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01425281.

FINDINGS

Between Nov 28, 2011, and June 4, 2013, we enrolled 501 patients and randomly assigned them to the bioresorbable scaffold group (335 patients, 364 lesions) or the metallic stent group (166 patients, 182 lesions). Dilatation pressure and balloon diameter at the highest pressure during implantation or postdilatation were higher and larger in the metallic stent group, whereas the acute recoil post implantation was similar (0.19 mm for both, p=0.85). Acute lumen gain was lower for the bioresorbable scaffold by quantitative coronary angiography (1.15 mm vs 1.46 mm, p<0.0001) and quantitative intravascular ultrasound (2.85 mm(2)vs 3.60 mm(2), p<0.0001), resulting in a smaller lumen diameter or area post procedure. At 1 year, however, cumulative rates of first new or worsening angina from adverse event reporting were lower (72 patients [22%] in the bioresorbable scaffold group vs 50 [30%] in the metallic stent group, p=0.04), whereas performance during maximum exercise and angina status by SAQ were similar. The 1-year composite device orientated endpoint was similar between the bioresorbable scaffold and metallic stent groups (16 patients [5%] vs five patients [3%], p=0.35). Three patients in the bioresorbable scaffold group had definite or probable scaffold thromboses (one definite acute, one definite sub-acute, and one probable late), compared with no patients in the metallic stent group. There were 17 (5%) major cardiac adverse events in the bioresorbable scaffold group compared with five (3%) events in the metallic stent group, with the most common adverse events being myocardial infarction (15 cases [4%] vs two cases [1%], respectively) and clinically indicated target-lesion revascularisation (four cases [1%] vs three cases [2%], respectively).

INTERPRETATION

The everolimus-eluting bioresorbable scaffold showed similar 1-year composite secondary clinical outcomes to the everolimus-eluting metallic stent.

FUNDING

Abbott Vascular.

Dynamics of vessel wall changes following the implantation of the absorb everolimus-eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffold: a multi-imaging modality study at 6, 12, 24 and 36 months

AIMS

To assess observations with multimodality imaging of the Absorb bioresorbable everolimus-eluting vascular scaffold performed in two consecutive cohorts of patients who were serially investigated either at 6 and 24 months or at 12 and 36 months.

METHODS AND RESULTS

In the ABSORB multicentre single-arm trial, 45 patients (cohort B1) and 56 patients (cohort B2) underwent serial invasive imaging, specifically quantitative coronary angiography (QCA), intravascular ultrasound (IVUS), radiofrequency backscattering (IVUS-VH) and optical coherence tomography (OCT). Between one and three years, late luminal loss remained unchanged (6 months: 0.19 mm, 1 year: 0.27 mm, 2 years: 0.27 mm, 3 years: 0.29 mm) and the in-segment angiographic restenosis rate for the entire cohort B (n=101) at three years was 6%. On IVUS, mean lumen, scaffold, plaque and vessel area showed enlargement up to two years. Mean lumen and scaffold area remained stable between two and three years whereas significant reduction in plaque behind the struts occurred with a trend toward adaptive restrictive remodelling of EEM. Hyperechogenicity of the vessel wall, a surrogate of the bioresorption process, decreased from 23.1% to 10.4% with a reduction of radiofrequency backscattering for dense calcium and necrotic core. At three years, the count of strut cores detected on OCT increased significantly, probably reflecting the dismantling of the scaffold; 98% of struts were covered. In the entire cohort B (n=101), the three-year major adverse cardiac event rate was 10.0% without any scaffold thrombosis.

CONCLUSIONS

The current investigation demonstrated the dynamics of vessel wall changes after implantation of a bioresorbable scaffold, resulting at three years in stable luminal dimensions, a low restenosis rate and a low clinical major adverse cardiac events rate.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION INFORMATION

http://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00856856.

Preventable effects of bare-metal stent on restenosis after everolimus-eluting stent deployment

This case report describes a patient who underwent implantation of a bare-metal stent (BMS) for the treatment of everolimus-eluting stent (EES) restenosis caused by chronic stent recoil, and the BMS successfully escaped from duplicate restenosis and target lesion revascularization (TLR).

Feasibility of second-generation bioresorbable vascular scaffold implantation in complex anatomical and clinical scenarios

Background

Bioresorbable vascular scaffolds (BVS) have become an emerging tool to treat coronary artery disease. However, the current use of BVS is still widely restricted to stable patients and non-complex lesions. In real-world practice patients are far more complex than those with simple type A lesions and the extended use of BVS to complex lesions and high-risk patients needs to be evaluated. Therefore, we sought to investigate the feasibility and performance of BVS in a broad spectrum of patients.

Methods

106 patients underwent in total 193 BVS implantations. We assessed the device-related (cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction, ischemia-driven target lesion revascularization) and patient-related (all-cause death, any reinfarction and any revascularization) composite outcomes.

Results

90 % of patients (n = 95) had at least one of the following characteristics: >65 years (35 %), ACS (42 %), tortuous vessels (13 %), calcified (17 %) or thrombotic lesions (12 %), lesions defined as AHA type B2/C (42 %), bifurcations (16 %), chronic total occlusions (9 %) or restenosis (14 %). There was no evidence of significant edge dissection, huge thrombus load or incidence of scaffold dislodgement or scaffold disruption in optical coherence tomography pullbacks. Out of 10,157 struts evaluated within 1,117 cross-sections, 302 were classified as malapposed (2.9 %). During a mean follow-up of 147 ± 119 days the rate of device-related events was 2.0 %, whereas patient-related composite events occurred in 6.1 %.

Conclusions

Our results strongly suggest that BVS implantation is feasible in a wide spectrum of patients and complex anatomy of coronary lesions. Long-term outcome of BVS should be further investigated in unrestricted settings in randomized controlled trials.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s00392-014-0757-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Five-year clinical and functional multislice computed tomography angiographic results after coronary implantation of the fully resorbable polymeric everolimus-eluting scaffold in patients with de novo coronary artery disease: the ABSORB cohort A trial

OBJECTIVES

This study sought to demonstrate the 5-year clinical and functional multislice computed tomography angiographic results after implantation of the fully resorbable everolimus-eluting scaffold (Absorb BVS, Abbott Vascular, Santa Clara, California).

BACKGROUND

Multimodality imaging of the first-in-humans trial using a ABSORB BVS scaffold demonstrated at 2 years the bioresorption of the device while preventing restenosis. However, the long-term safety and efficacy of this therapy remain to be documented.

METHODS

In the ABSORB cohort A trial (ABSORB Clinical Investigation, Cohort A [ABSORB A] Everolimus-Eluting Coronary Stent System Clinical Investigation), 30 patients with a single de novo coronary artery lesion were treated with the fully resorbable everolimus-eluting Absorb scaffold at 4 centers. As an optional investigation in 3 of the 4 centers, the patients underwent multislice computed tomography (MSCT) angiography at 18 months and 5 years. Acquired MSCT data were analyzed at an independent core laboratory (Cardialysis, Rotterdam, the Netherlands) for quantitative analysis of lumen dimensions and was further processed for calculation of fractional flow reserve (FFR) at another independent core laboratory (Heart Flow, Redwood City, California).

RESULTS

Five-year clinical follow-up is available for 29 patients. One patient withdrew consent after 6 months, but the vital status of this patient remains available. At 46 days, 1 patient experienced a single episode of chest pain and underwent a target lesion revascularization with a slight troponin increase after the procedure. At 5 years, the ischemia-driven major adverse cardiac event rate of 3.4% remained unchanged. Clopidogrel was discontinued in all but 1 patient. Scaffold thrombosis was not observed in any patient. Two noncardiac deaths were reported, 1 caused by duodenal perforation and the other from Hodgkin's disease. At 5 years, 18 patients underwent MSCT angiography. All scaffolds were patent, with a median minimal lumen area of 3.25 mm(2) (interquartile range: 2.20 to 4.30). Noninvasive FFR analysis was feasible in 13 of 18 scans, which yielded a median distal FFR of 0.86 (interquartile range: 0.82 to 0.94).

CONCLUSIONS

The low event rate at 5 years suggests sustained safety after the implantation of a fully bioresorbable Absorb everolimus-eluting scaffold. Noninvasive assessment of the coronary artery with an option of functional assessment could be an alternative to invasive imaging after treatment of coronary narrowing with such a polymeric bioresorbable scaffold. (ABSORB Clinical Investigation, Cohort A [ABSORB A] Everolimus-Eluting Coronary Stent System Clinical Investigation [ABSORB]; NCT00300131).

Bioabsorbable stent quo vadis: a case for nano-theranostics

Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is one of the most commonly performed invasive medical procedures in medicine today. Since the first coronary balloon angioplasty in 1977, interventional cardiology has seen a wide array of developments in PCI. Bare metal stents (BMS) were soon superseded by the revolutionary drug-eluting stents (DES), which aimed to address the issue of restenosis found with BMS. However, evidence began to mount against DES, with late-stent thrombosis (ST) rates being higher than that of BMS. The bioabsorbable stent may be a promising alternative, providing vessel patency and support for the necessary time required and thereafter degrade into safe non-toxic compounds which are reabsorbed by the body. This temporary presence provides no triggers for ST, which is brought about by non-endothelialized stent struts and drug polymers remaining in vivo for extended periods of time. Likewise, nano-theranostics incorporated into a bioabsorbable stent of the future may provide an incredibly valuable single platform offering both therapeutic and diagnostic capabilities. Such a stent may allow delivery of therapeutic particles to specific sites thus keeping potential toxicity to a minimum, improved ease of tracking delivery in vivo by embedding imaging agents, controlled rate of therapy release and protection of the implanted therapy. Indeed, nanocarriers may allow an increased therapeutic index as well as offer novel post-stent implantation imaging and diagnostic methods for atherosclerosis, restenosis and thrombosis. It is envisioned that a nano-theranostic stent may well form the cornerstone of future stent designs in clinical practice.