Pooled Analysis of the CONFIRM Registries

Purpose: To compare the acute procedure and angiographic outcomes of peripheral artery disease (PAD) patients treated with orbital atherectomy stratified by gender. Methods: The CONFIRM I, II, and III registries are US multicenter, nonrandomized, all-comers registries of PAD patients who were treated with orbital atherectomy. All patients with gender specified in the registry database were included in the current analysis, which compared the final residual stenosis achieved after atherectomy and the rate of acute complications in female and male patients. The 3 registries included 3131 patients with 4761 lesions: 1261 women (mean age 73.2±10.7 years) with 1874 lesions and 1870 men (mean age 70.4±10.2) with 2887 lesions. Results: The women were older (p<0.001) and had a higher but nonsignificant prevalence of critical limb ischemia (p=0.075). After treatment, the final residual stenosis in women vs. men was 9%±11% vs. 11%±11%, respectively (p<0.001). Women had a higher rate of all types of dissection (13.3% vs. 9.9%, p<0.001). However, both genders had similar rates of flow-limiting dissections (1.6% vs. 1.4%, p=0.61), perforation, slow flow, vessel closure, spasm, embolism, and thrombus formation. Conclusion: The gender analysis of the CONFIRM registries revealed that there was successful lesion modification with orbital atherectomy in both men and women; however, women had a higher rate of dissection (all types). This difference is likely because of the older age and higher percentage of critical limb ischemia in women in this cohort. These results, however, suggest that additional studies should be completed to further understand the increased risks for women vs. men during endovascular procedures.

Pooled analysis of the CONFIRM registries: safety outcomes in diabetic patients treated with orbital atherectomy for peripheral artery disease

PURPOSE

To compare the acute outcomes of orbital atherectomy treatment in diabetic vs. non-diabetic patients with peripheral artery disease (PAD).

METHODS

The CONFIRM registry series contained 1842 diabetic patients (1111 men; mean age 70.6±10.2 years) with 2819 lesions and 1247 non-diabetic patients (732 men; mean age 72.9±10.7 years) with 1885 lesions. The composite rate of procedure-related complications, including dissection, perforation, slow flow, vessel closure, spasm, embolism, and thrombus formation, was analyzed for the diabetic and non-diabetic groups.

RESULTS

Diabetics were younger but had a higher prevalence of coronary artery disease (p<0.001), renal disease (p<0.001), hypertension (p<0.001), hyperlipidemia (p<0.001), and lower ankle-brachial index scores (p=0.007). Diabetics had more severe PAD (Rutherford category 4-6; p<0.001), longer lesions (p<0.001), more infrapopliteal lesions (58% vs. 46%, p<0.001), and more lesions with severe and moderate calcium (86% vs. 78%, p<0.001). Diabetic and non-diabetic patients had the same (21.8%) composite rate of procedure-related complications, as well as similar rates of dissection (11.4% vs. 10.8%, p=0.68), embolism (2.2% vs. 2.4%, p=0.67), and thrombus formation (1.3% vs. 1.1%, p=0.75). However, diabetics had lower rates of perforation (0.5% vs. 1.1%, p=0.03) and spasm (5.5% vs. 7.6%, p=0.005), but a higher rate of slow flow (5.0% vs. 3.5%, p=0.02) and a tendency toward increased vessel closure (1.7% vs. 0.9%, p=0.06).

CONCLUSION

Plaque modification with orbital atherectomy resulted in similar low procedure-related complication rates in both the diabetic and non-diabetic groups, despite diabetics having more unfavorable baseline clinical and lesion characteristics. This study suggests that orbital atherectomy is a safe and effective treatment modality in both the diabetic and the non-diabetic populations.