Transcatheter closure of multiple interatrial communications

Interatrial Communications: Prevalence and Subtypes in 12,385 Newborns-a Copenhagen Baby Heart Study

The prevalence of interatrial communications in newborns, i.e., patent foramen ovale or atrial septal defect, was previously reported to be between 24 and 92%, but the area has been impeded by lack of a universal classification method. A recently published novel echocardiographic diagnostic algorithm for systematic classification of interatrial communications had inter-and intraobserver agreements superior to standard expert assessment. This study aimed to determine the prevalence of subtypes of interatrial communications on transthoracic echocardiography in newborns. Echocardiograms of newborns aged 0-30 days were prospectively collected in the population-based cohort study Copenhagen Baby Heart Study in 2017-2018 and analyzed according to the new diagnostic algorithm, classifying interatrial communications into three subtypes of patent foramen ovale and three subtypes of atrial septal defects. Echocardiograms from 15,801 newborns were analyzed; 3416 (21.6%) were excluded due to suboptimal image quality or severe structural heart disease (n = 3), leaving 12,385 newborns (aged 12 [interquartile range 8; 15] days, 48.2% female) included in the study. An interatrial communication was detected in 9766 (78.9%) newborns. According to the algorithm, 9029 (72.9%) had a patent foramen ovale, while 737 (6.0%) fulfilled criteria for an atrial septal defect, further divided into subtypes. An interatrial communication was seen on echocardiography in almost 80% of newborns aged 0-30 days. Patent foramen ovale was 12 times more frequent than atrial septal defects. The observed prevalence of atrial septal defects was higher than previously reported. Follow up studies could distinguish which interatrial communications require follow-up or intervention. ClinicalTrial.gov, NCT02753348, posted April 27, 2016, [ https://classic.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02753348 ].

Can Artificial Intelligence Revolutionize the Diagnosis and Management of the Atrial Septal Defect in Children?

Atrial septal defects (ASDs) present a significant healthcare challenge, demanding accurate and timely diagnosis and precise management to ensure optimal patient outcomes. Artificial intelligence (AI) applications in healthcare are rapidly evolving, offering promise for enhanced medical decision-making and patient care. In the context of cardiology, the integration of AI promises to provide more efficient and accurate diagnosis and personalized treatment strategies for ASD patients. In interventional cardiology, sometimes the lack of precise measurement of the cardiac rims evaluated by transthoracic echocardiography combined with the floppy aspect of the rims can mislead and result in complications. AI software can be created to generate responses for difficult tasks, like which device is the most suitable for different shapes and dimensions to prevent embolization or erosion. This paper reviews the current state of AI in healthcare and its applications in cardiology, emphasizing the specific opportunities and challenges in applying AI to ASD diagnosis and management. By exploring the capabilities and limitations of AI in ASD diagnosis and management. This paper highlights the evolution of medical practice towards a more AI-augmented future, demonstrating the capacity of AI to unlock new possibilities for healthcare professionals and patients alike.

Balloon Interrogation of Intervening Tissue: A Novel Method to Decide Strategy for Closing Multiple Atrial Septal Defects

BACKGROUND

Two separate ostium secundum atrial septal defects are a challenging substrate for device closure due to lack of a well-described strategy or an adequately evaluated protocol.

METHODS

This is a prospective study comprising 20 patients with 2 atrial septal defects who underwent device closure. All of them underwent balloon interrogation (BI) of the intervening tissue to decide 1- versus 2-device strategy. During BI, if the flow through both the defects could be stopped completely implying adequate mobility of the separating tissue, a single device strategy was used. The size of the device in this subset was determined by BI diameter. In case the flow persisted, 2 devices were used to close the defects separately.

RESULTS

The mean age was 24±17 years. The main defect size was (mean 14.5 mm±SD 2.69 mm), whereas the second defect measured (mean 8.5±SD 3.02 mm). The tissue separating the 2 defects was measured (mean 6.1±SD 2.6 mm). In 15 of them, based on the BI results, a single device was used successfully to close both the defects without a residual shunt. In the remaining 5 patients, 2 devices were used. There were no complications during the procedure or at follow-up period of 41.9±16.9 months.

CONCLUSIONS

BI in patients with 2 atrial septal defects is helpful in defining 1- versus 2-device strategies and in choosing the size of the device to be used. Nearly 3/4 of the patients may get away with a single device for closing both the defects successfully thereby decreasing the cost and complexity of the procedure.

Transcatheter closure of fenestrated atrial septal aneurysm in children: Feasibility and long-term results

BACKGROUND

To date, extensive experience in transcatheter closure of fenestrated atrial septal aneurysm (ASA) in the pediatric population is limited.

METHODS

To report on procedural feasibility, efficacy, and long-term outcome, we enrolled all children submitted to an attempt of transcatheter closure of fenestrated ASA at two, large volume, pediatric cardiology units (Naples and Massa, Italy) between April 2000 to May 2020.

RESULTS

This retrospective study included 139 patients (median age 9 years [range 2-18] and weight 36 kg [range 10-102]); 19 (13.7%) children were ≤20 kg (range 10-20) and 14 (10.1%) were ≤5 years old. Single perforation was observed in 28 patients (20.1%), while 111 patients (79.9%) had multifenestrated ASA. The median size of the main defect was 15 mm (range 6-34) and 25 patients (18%) had a defect ≥20 mm. The procedural success rate was 99% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 94.9-99.8) using a single device in 75 (69%), two devices in 31 (28%), and three devices in 3 (3%) cases. Early minor adverse events (AEs) occurred in four patients (2.8%). Late minor AEs were recorded in one patient (0.7%) over a median follow-up of 5 years ([range 0-18 years; total 890.2 person-years, and with 30 patients (22%) followed ≥10 years). Neither mortality nor major AEs were recorded. Freedom from AEs was 99.1% at 10-15 years (95% CI: 93.5-99.8%), without any difference according to atrial septum anatomy or patient age and weight.

CONCLUSION

Transcatheter closure of fenestrated ASA is technically feasible and effective in children with excellent long-term outcomes.

Transcatheter closure of multiple secundum atrial septal defects using multiple occluder devices: A comparative experience between pediatric and adult patients

Background:

Device closure of multiple atrial septal defects (MASDs) is frequently done using a single centrally deployed septal or cribriform occluder, but multiple devices are needed for large defects separated more than 6 mm. There is a concern about complications while using multiple devices, especially in children.

Methods:

Patients who received multiple devices for closure of MASD were grouped according to their age and analyzed for procedural techniques, immediate and late complications. MASDs closed by a single device were not included. Balloon sizing was done when echocardiographic images were suboptimal before simultaneous device deployment through two venous accesses or sequential deployment through one access. Duration and number of antiplatelet drugs and residual flows were analyzed on follow-up.

Results:

Twenty-five patients received multiple devices. Balloon interrogation was performed in 16/18 adults but only in 2/7 children. Device size was 2–5 mm larger than echocardiographic defect size or equal to balloon waist. There were no procedural failures; 7/25 showed small postprocedural residual flows. Complications including embolization in one, arrhythmia in one, and cobra deformity in two were managed successfully. On a median follow-up of 5.5 years (1–12 years), residual flows disappeared in 4/7 and there were no major late complications.

Conclusions:

Use of multiple devices for closing MASD is feasible with good technical success. Echocardiography and balloon interrogation are the keys for success. Simultaneous deployment is often needed and sequential delivery is feasible rarely if the defects are far apart. Minor residual leaks are common but improve on follow-up. There are no significant new complications on long-term follow-up.

Transcatheter closure of fenestrated atrial septal aneurysm: feasibility and long-term results

AIM

To report on the feasibility, efficacy and long-term outcome of transcatheter closure of fenestrated Atrial Septal Aneurysm (ASA).

METHODS

Between April 2000 and May 2020, 568 patients with fenestrated ASA underwent transcatheter closure at two large-volume Pediatric Cardiology and GUCH Units (Naples and Massa, Italy). Procedural indications were cardiac volume overload in 223 patients (39%) or prophylaxis of paradoxical embolization in 345 patients (61%). Patients' median age and weight were 42 years (range 19-52) and 66 kg (range 54-79), respectively. One-hundred and thirty-nine patients (25%) were younger than 18 years.

RESULTS

Single fenestration was found in 311 patients (55%) (Group 1), whereas 257 patients (45%) had multifenestrated ASA (Group 2). The procedure was successful in all but seven patients (1.2%). In Group 1, closure was achieved with a single device. In Group 2, one device was used in 168 patients (67%), two devices in 74 patients (28%), three devices in 12 patients (5%), and four devices in 1 patient (0.3%). The early complication rate was 3%, without any difference according to anatomy or patient's age. At discharge, complete shunt closure was higher in Group 1 (92% vs. 72%, P < 0.0001), without any difference between groups at the last follow-up evaluation (100% vs. 99%, P = 0.12). Procedural safety was persistent during the long-term follow-up (mean 7.2 ± 5.4, range 0-19 years): freedom from adverse events was 97% at 10-15 years. Seventeen patients (3%) were submitted to reintervention, mostly as prophylaxis of paradoxical embolization.

CONCLUSION

Transcatheter closure of perforated ASA is technically feasible in a high percentage of cases, with excellent long-term outcomes.

Migraine and atrial fibrillation: a systematic review

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Patients with migraine are at increased risk of stroke. The aim was to systematically review the current literature on the association between migraine and atrial fibrillation, which is a relevant risk factor for stroke.

METHODS

PubMed was searched for 'migraine' AND 'atrial fibrillation' and selected original investigations on the association of migraine and atrial fibrillation for our analysis. Articles without original data, such as guidelines, narrative reviews, editorials and others, were excluded.

RESULTS

In all, 109 publications were found. Twenty-two were included and analysed for this review. The population-based Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities study showed a significant association of migraine with visual aura and incident atrial fibrillation (hazard ratio 1.30, 95% confidence interval 1.03-1.62, p = 0.02), but not for migraine without aura, compared to non-headache persons after multivariable adjustment for vascular risk factors. An even larger population-based study in Denmark confirmed this association (odds ratio 1.25, 95% confidence interval 1.16-1.36). Studies investigating patients with ischaemic stroke and migraine are methodologically insufficient and provide contradictory results. Ablation therapy for atrial fibrillation in patients with migraine might reduce migraine attacks, but transient post-ablation new-onset migraine-like headaches in persons without a history of migraine have also been reported.

CONCLUSION

Population-based studies indicate a significant association of migraine with aura and atrial fibrillation. In practical terms, screening for atrial fibrillation in patients who have a long history of migraine might be reasonable, whereas in patients with stroke or other disorders and migraine extensive screening for atrial fibrillation should be performed as in all patients without migraine.

Individualized Experience With Percutaneous Transcatheter Closure of Multiple Atrial Septal Defects: A Single-Center Study

Multiple atrial septal defects (ASDs) are one type of secundum ASD, most of which have an atrial septal aneurysm or long interdefect distance. In our retrospective single-center study, we reviewed different closure strategies for multiple ASDs. We analyzed 50 patients who underwent percutaneous transcatheter closure from May 2011 to July 2019. Information on the patients' characteristics, operation procedure, occluder selection, and complications was collected. According to the feature of the defects and device choice, multiple ASDs were divided into five groups. A successful operation was achieved in every patient. A total of 50 patients were implanted with 58 devices, with 26 patients implanted with a single standard ASD occluder (ASDO); six patients were implanted with double standard ASDOs, and only one patient was implanted with three standard ASDOs. There were 17 patients whose closure was made using the small-waist–big-edge ASDO. Seventy-six percent of the patients (38/50) had an immediate residual shunt. During the mean follow-up of 25.76 ± 22.53 months, the complete closure rate was 92%. Except for two patients with a transient atrioventricular block, individualized experience with percutaneous transcatheter closure for multiple ASDs was effective in a single-center study. After a mid- to long-term follow-up, the multiple ASDOs and small-waist–big-edge ASDO had no serious adverse events or complications.

Trans-catheter atrial septal defect closure with the new GORE® Cardioform ASD occluder: First European experience

BACKGROUND

This perspective, observational study evaluated safety and efficacy of the GORE® Cardioform ASD Occluder (WL Gore & Associates, Flagstaff, AZ), compliant and potentially innovative prosthesis recently approved for closure of ostium secundum atrial septal defects (ASD).

METHODS

Between January and June 2020, 43 unselected patients with -significant ASD were submitted to trans-catheter closure with GORE® Cardioform ASD Occluder at two high-volume Italian Pediatric Cardiology centers. Primary endpoints were procedural success and safety. Secondary endpoints were closure rate and clinical safety at 1-month follow-up.

RESULTS

Patients' age and weight were 8.2 ± 3.9 years (range 3-21, median 9.9) and 29.6 ± 15.3 kg (range 16-57, median 33.3), respectively. ASD diameter was 16.6 ± 4.5 mm (median 10), resulting in QP/QS of 1.7 ± 0.7 (median 1.6). Seventeen pts. (39.5%) were considered "surgical" candidates due to challenging septum morphology, ASD rim deficiency or ASD diameter/patient weight ratio ≥ 1.2. Device placement was successfully achieved in all but one patient (97.7%), in whom it embolized early after deployment, resulting in rescue surgical repair. No cross-over with different devices was recorded. Median procedure and fluoroscopy times were 40 and 6.8 min, respectively. Major adverse events were recorded in 7.0% (3 pts). Complete closure rate was 78.5% at discharge, rising to 92.9% (39/42 pts) at 1 month evaluation, without cardiac or extra-cardiac adverse events. "Challenging" procedures were more time-consuming but as effective and safe as the "simple" ones.

CONCLUSIONS

The GORE® Cardioform ASD Occluder device was highly effective and versatile in closure of ASDs with different anatomy and size, even in challenging settings.

New solution for old challenge: Device closure of non-centrally positioned atrial septal defect

Multiple interatrial defects, termed fenestrated ASDs that require closure are not uncommon. The problem arises when a centrally located defect or a patent foramen oval (PFO) is associated with another peripherally located defect. In cases like this, all attempts at crossing the true defect might totally fail or might be difficult because the wire or the catheter crosses the central defect repeatedly despite the use of a sizing balloon. In order to overcome such an issue, we introduce a new technique by which not only the procedure and the fluoroscopy time will be reduced, but also it ceases the mistakes about the number of defects, their size and location.

Comparison of Transcatheter Atrial Septal Defect Closure in Children, Adolescents and adults: Differences, Challenges and Short-, Mid- and Long-Term Results

Background and Objectives

This study aims to compare the characteristics, effectiveness and results of transcatheter closure of atrial septal defect between children, adolescents, and adults.

Subjects and Methods

In this study, 683 patients who underwent atrial septal defect closure in the last 10 years were divided into three groups: children (age <12), adolescents (age 12 to 16), and adults (age >16) as group 1, group 2 and group 3, respectively.

Results

The average defect size and incidence of complex atrial septal defect were higher in group 3 (p=0.0001 and 0.03 respectively). While the average size of the devic was higher in adults (22.6±6.4 mm vs. 18.5±4.9 mm; p=0.0001), the ratio of the device size/total septum was higher in both children and adolescents (Group 1 and 2). In the child and adolescent groups and patients with only complex atrial septal defect, the use of techniques, other than standard deployment, was similar in all three groups (p=0.86 and 0.41, respectively). The ratio of the residual shunt was similar in all three groups. Major complications were seen in 5 cases (4 cases with migration, and 1 case with dislocation) in group 3 and 1 case (migration) in group 1.

Conclusion

Depending on the complexity of the defect and age of the patient, transcatheter closure of atrial septal defect might have certain difficulties and complications. Patients must be evaluated in detail to avoid major complications and possible problems during the procedure.

Simultaneous Transcatheter Closure of Multiple Atrial Septal Defects Using Dual Amplatzer Septal Occluder Devices

BACKGROUND

Transcatheter closure has been a recognised treatment strategy for multiple atrial septal defects (mASDs). This study aimed to examine the feasibility, effectiveness, and safety of transcatheter closure of mASDs using dual Amplatzer septal occluder (ASO) devices.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 34 patients who underwent transcatheter closure of mASDs using dual ASO devices from April 2005 to December 2014.

RESULTS

Eight men and 26 women who successfully underwent transcatheter closure of mASDs were included. Ten (29.4%) patients had 3 defects or more. The mean diameters of the larger and smaller defects were 14.0±3.9 mm (8-20 mm) and 9.1±2.6 mm (4-15 mm), respectively. The mean diameters of the larger and smaller devices were 22.2±4.8 mm (13-30 mm) and 17.3±4.1 mm (10-26 mm), respectively. Devices were deployed by the "sandwiches" technique or an interleaved pattern. Immediately after the procedure, 23 (67.6%) patients had complete closure and 11 patients had a residual shunt (6 trivial, 3 small, 1 moderate, 1 large). During the 6 months of follow-up, 30 (88.2%) patients had complete closure of the shunt and 4 patients had a residual shunt (1 large, 3 small). Complications included 2 cases of pericardial effusion, which disappeared at 3 months.

CONCLUSIONS

Simultaneous device implantation in transcatheter closure of mASDs is feasible and effective. The incidence rate of residual shunts is slightly high in the short term, but tends to decrease during mid-term follow-up.

Fenestrated atrial septal defect percutaneously occluded by a single device: procedural and financial considerations

A 45-year-old patient presented with a cerebrovascular attack and was subsequently found to have a multi-fenestrated atrial septal defect. Various therapeutic options for percutaneous transcatheter closure with their respective benefits and flaws are discussed, as well as procedural and financial considerations. The decision making process leading to a successful result using a single occlusive device is presented, alongside a review of the literature.