The impact of chronic kidney disease severity on clinical outcomes after current generation drug-eluting stent implantation for left main distal bifurcation lesions: the Milan and New-Tokyo registry

Objectives. The impact of chronic kidney disease (CKD) on clinical outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for unprotected left main distal bifurcation lesions (ULMD) is not fully understood in current generation drug eluting stent (cDES) era. We assessed clinical outcomes after PCI using cDES for ULMD according to CKD severity based on estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). Design. We identified 720 consecutive patients who underwent PCI using cDES for ULMD at three high volume centers between January 2005 and December 2015. We divided those patients to the following five groups according to eGFR. Each group was defined as follows: no CKD (60 mL/min/1.73 m² ≤ eGFR), mild CKD (45 ≤ eGFR < 60 mL/min/1.73 m²), moderate CKD (30 ≤ eGFR < 45 mL/min/1.73 m²), severe CKD (15 ≤ eGFR < 30 mL/min/1.73 m²) and hemodialysis (HD). The primary endpoint was target lesion failure (TLF) at 3 years. TLF was defined as a composite of cardiac death, target lesion revascularization (TLR) and myocardial infarction (MI). Results. TLF occurred more frequently in severe CKD and HD group compared with other three groups. Conclusions. The patients who have severe CKD or are on HD, were extremely associated with worse clinical outcomes after PCI for ULMD even with cDES.

Usefulness of the Finet law to guide stent size selection in ostial left main stenting: Comparison with standard angiographic estimation

BACKGROUNDS

Intravascular ultrasound has been suggested to optimize stent diameter and length in Left Main (LM) procedures, but in the real-world ostial LM stenting is often accomplished with angiography only guidance. The Finet law which regulates the fractal geometry of human bifurcation has the potential to increase the accuracy of stent-sizing. To retrospectively evaluating the impact on outcomes of the addition of Finet Law to standard quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) in guiding stent selection of ostial LM stenting compared to standard angiography estimation.

METHODS

We retrospectively evaluated the clinical and instrumental records of patients with isolated ostial LM disease and bypass surgery contraindications or refusal as determined by the local Heart Team who received stenting from 1 January 2012 to 1 January 2017 at Rovigo General Hospital. Patients were discrimined on the basis of the addition to QCA angiographic evaluation of the Finet-law.

RESULTS

Seventy-three patients (45 males, mean age 69.9 ± 10.9 years old) ostial LM stenting, 36 patients using QCA and Finet law (QCA-Finet) and 37 using standard QCA angiographic (QCA-angio) evaluation of the vessel diameter. By QCA, vessel size, mean stent diameter at implantation and after post-dilatation were clearly bigger in the QCA+ Finet than QCA-angio (4.4 ± 0.8 and 3.8 ± 0.7, p < 0.001). At a mean follow-up of 5.0 ± 0.4 years, cardiovascular mortality and cardiovascular events incidence were higher in QCA-angio compared to QCA+Finet group of patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study suggested that adding the Finet law to standard angiography estimation of the LM stent size may improve long-term outcomes.

Propensity score matched all comers population treated with ultra-thin strut bare metal and sirolimus-probucol coated drug-eluting stents of identical stent architecture

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to compare the safety and efficacy of a polymer-free sirolimus coated, ultrathin strut drug eluting stent (PF-SES) to its uncoated bare-metal stent (BMS) platform of identical stent architecture.

BACKGROUND

Recently published randomized trials comparing BMS to DES with a focus on shortened dual-antiplatelet therapy reported incidences of stent thrombosis (ST) and bleeding complications (LEADERS FREE) in favor of drug eluting stents (DES).

METHODS

Data of previously published large-sale, international, single-armed, multicenter, observational studies of ultra-thin PF-SES, and BMS were propensity score (PS) matched for selected lesion morphological and cardiovascular risk factors to compare target lesion revascularization (TLR), myocardial infarction, cardiac death, major adverse cardiac events (MACE), bleeding complications and ST rates. Primary endpoint in both studies was TLR at 9 months.

RESULTS

At 9 months the rates of TLR was significantly lower in the PF-SES group as compared with patients treated with the BMS analogue of identical stent design (1.4% vs. 4.6%, P = 0.005). Likewise the 9-month MACE rates were lower in the PF-SES group (3.2% vs. 8.7%, P = 0.001) whereas there were no differences in the accumulated ST rates (0.5% vs. 1.5%, P = 0.109). Overall accumulated bleeding incidences (BARC 1-5) were not significantly different between PF-SES and BMS patients (1.8% vs. 2.7%, p = 0.388).

CONCLUSIONS

PF-SES are superior over analogue BMS of identical stent architecture in daily clinical routine with lower rates of TLR and MACE in a PS-matched, unselected patient population without differences in accumulated ST rates and bleeding frequencies given the currently favored postprocedural comedication (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT02629575).

Percutaneous coronary intervention for coronary bifurcation disease: 11th consensus document from the European Bifurcation Club

Coronary bifurcations are involved in 15-20% of all percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) and remain one of the most challenging lesions in interventional cardiology in terms of procedural success rate as well as long-term cardiac events. The optimal management of bifurcation lesions is, despite a fast growing body of scientific literature, the subject of considerable debate. The European Bifurcation Club (EBC) was initiated in 2004 to support a continuous overview of the field, and aims to facilitate a scientific discussion and an exchange of ideas on the management of bifurcation disease. The EBC hosts an annual, compact meeting, dedicated to bifurcations, which brings together physicians, engineers, biologists, physicists, epidemiologists and statisticians for detailed discussions. Every meeting is finalised with a consensus statement which reflects the unique opportunity of combining the opinions of interventional cardiologists with the opinions of a large variety of other scientists on bifurcation management. The present 11th EBC consensus document represents the summary of the up-to-date EBC consensus and recommendations. It points to the fact that there is a multitude of strategies and approaches to bifurcation stenting within the provisional strategy and in the different two-stent strategies. The main EBC recommendation for PCI of bifurcation lesions remains to use main vessel (MV) stenting with a proximal optimisation technique (POT) and provisional side branch (SB) stenting as a preferred approach. The consensus document covers a moving target. Much more scientific work is needed in non-left main (LM) and LM bifurcation lesions for continuous improvement of the outcome of our patients.